Ransom theory of atonement

Short description: Concept in Christian theology

This page is about the doctrine that Jesus Christ's sacrifice was a ransom. For the general concept of atonement in Christianity, see Atonement in Christianity.

Template:Atonement in Christianity

The ransom theory of atonement is a theory in Christian theology as to how the process of Atonement in Christianity had happened. It therefore accounts for the meaning and effect of the death of Jesus Christ. It is one of a number of historical theories, and was mostly popular between the 4th and 11th centuries, with little support in recent times. It originated in the early Church, particularly in the work of Origen. The theory teaches that the death of Christ was a ransom sacrifice, usually said to have been paid to Satan, in satisfaction for the bondage and debt on the souls of humanity as a result of inherited sin.[1]

## Contents

* 1 New Testament on ransom
* 2 Theological views of Christ as ransom
* 3 In the Eastern Church
* 4 In the Roman Catholic Church
* 5 Protestantism
* 5.1 Lutheranism
* 5.2 Adventism
* 6 References
* 7 Sources

## New Testament on ransom

In Matthew 20:28, Jesus says "the Son of Man...came...to give his life as a ransom for many."[2] 1 Timothy 2:6 states that Jesus "gave himself as ransom for all."[3]

## Theological views of Christ as ransom

The ransom view can be summarized as follows:

> Essentially, this theory claimed that Adam and Eve sold humanity over to the Devil at the time of the Fall; hence, it required that God pay the Devil a ransom to free us from the Devil's clutches. God, however, tricked the Devil into accepting Christ's death as a ransom, for the Devil did not realize that Christ could not be held in the bonds of death. Once the Devil accepted Christ's death as a ransom, this theory concluded, justice was satisfied and God was able to free us from Satan's grip.

> - Robin Collins, Understanding Atonement: A New and Orthodox Theory[1]

St. Augustine wrote the following to explain the theory:

> The Redeemer came and the deceiver was overcome. What did our Redeemer do to our Captor? In payment for us He set the trap, His Cross, with His blood for bait. He [Satan] could indeed shed that blood; but he deserved not to drink it. By shedding the blood of One who was not his debtor, he was forced to release his debtors

> - Doctrine of the Atonement, Catholic Encyclopedia[4]

However, Augustine's own stance on the issue is not entirely clear; his writings support both the ransom theory and the recapitulation theory of atonement at different times, perhaps indicating that he perceived both theories as compatible with each other.[5]

"Redeeming" in this case literally means "buying back," and the ransoming of war captives from slavery was a common practice in the era. The theory was also based in part on Mark 10:45 and 1 Timothy 2:5-6, where Jesus and Paul mentioned the word "ransom" in the context of atonement. There were some who held different positions, however. The commentary on Romans attributed to Pelagius (who was declared a heretic, though for his view of grace, not his view of atonement) gives a description of the atonement which states that a person's sins have "sold them to death," and not to the devil, and that these sins alienate them from God, until Jesus, dying, ransomed people from death.[6]

Writing in the 4th century, St. Athanasius of Alexandria proposed a theory of the atonement which similarly states that sin bears the consequence of death, that God warned Adam about this, and so, to remain consistent with Himself must have Jesus die as Man's perfect prototype, or let humankind die mired in sin. This has some similarity to the satisfaction view, although Athanasius emphasized the fact that this death is effective because of our unity with Christ, rather than emphasizing a legal substitution or transfer of merits and that when Jesus descended into hades (variously, the underworld or hell, the abode of the dead) he eliminated death with his own death, since the power of death cannot hold God, Who is Life, captive.[7]

Anselm, an 11th-century scholastic theologian and second Archbishop of Canterbury after the Norman conquest, argued against the then-current version of the ransom view, saying that Satan, being himself a rebel and outlaw, could never have a just claim against human beings.[1] The Catholic Encyclopedia calls the idea that God must pay the Devil a ransom "certainly startling, if not revolting."[8] Philosopher and theologian Keith Ward, among others, pointed out that, under the ransom view, not only was God a debtor but a deceiver as well, since God only pretended to pay the debt.[9]

Others, such as Gustaf Aulén, have suggested that the meaning of the ransom theory should not be taken in terms of a business transaction (who receives payment), but rather as the emancipation of human beings from the bondage of sin and death. Aulén's book, Christus Victor, maintained that the Early Church view had been mischaracterized, and proposed a re-evaluated Ransom Theory as a superior alternative to Satisfaction Theory.

Anselm himself went on to explicate the satisfaction view of atonement, now espoused by the Roman Catholic Church.

Presently the "ransom-to-Satan" view of atonement, literally interpreted, is not widely accepted in the West,[10][11] except by some Anabaptist peace churches[12] and a few figures in the Word of Faith movement, such as Kenneth Copeland.[13]

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops comments on Matthew 20:28 that the word ransom "does not necessarily express the idea of liberation by payment of some price. The cognate verb is used frequently in the LXX of God’s liberating Israel from Egypt or from Babylonia after the Exile; see Ex 6:6; 15:13; Ps 77:16 (76 LXX); Is 43:1; 44:22."[14]

## In the Eastern Church

Template:Origenism

Origen of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, and Augustine of Hippo taught views in line with the standard Ransom theory and the Liturgy of St. Basil the Great (celebrated ten times annually in the Byzantine Rite) speaks of Christ as a ransom unto death, other Church Fathers such as Gregory the Theologian vigorously denied that Christ was ransomed to Satan or any evil power, though he does not by any means deny that Christ was a ransom.[15] In his Catechetical Orations, Cyril of Jerusalem suggests Christ's ransom was in fact paid to God the Father.

## In the Roman Catholic Church

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, an authoritative summary of official Roman Catholic teaching, describes the ransom paid by Christ at Calvary as a "mystery of universal redemption", but does not make any indication regarding to whom it was paid, or even that it was paid to any particular being at all.[16]

## Protestantism

The alternative view arising in the Reformation, and argued by prominent reformers like Luther and Calvin, is penal substitution.

### Lutheranism

Gustaf Aulén (1879-1977), a Swedish bishop in the Lutheran Church of Sweden, reinterpreted the ransom theory as a victory of Christ over the powers of evil, instead of as a ransom.[17]

### Adventism

In Adventism, all of humankind is considered to have inherited sin and death as a result of Adam's sin in the Garden of Eden. In this view, God's divine law requires that only the sacrificial death of a perfect human can atone for Adamic sin. Faith in the ransom of Jesus Christ--the Last Adam--is regarded as the only way to atone for sin and escape death. Jehovah's Witnesses[18] and the Seventh-day Adventist Church[19] are among the denominations that hold to this view.

## References

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Collins 1995
2. ↑ "Matthew 20:28 - A Mother's Request". https://biblehub.com/matthew/20-28.htm.
3. ↑ "1 Timothy 2:6 - A Call to Prayer". https://biblehub.com/1_timothy/2-6.htm.
4. ↑ Doctrine of the Atonement. The Catholic Encyclopedia
5. ↑ Michael Green, ‘‘The Empty Cross of Jesus’’ (Eastbourne: Kingsway, 2004; first published 1984), p. 67
6. ↑ Pelagius 1993
7. ↑ Athanasius 2011, Sections 4-6
8. ↑ Kent 1907
9. ↑ Ward, Keith (2004). What the Bible Really Teaches: A Challenge for Fundamentalists. SPCK.
10. ↑ Kelly, J. N. D. (2000). Early Christian Doctrines. A&C Black.
11. ↑ Olson, Roger E. (1999). The Story of Christian Theology. InterVarsity Press.
12. ↑ Weaver, J. Denny (2001). The Nonviolent Atonement. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co..
13. ↑ Believer's Voice of Victory. Kenneth Copeland Ministries. 1991.
14. ↑ "Matthew, CHAPTER 20 | USCCB" (in en). https://bible.usccb.org/bible/matthew/20.
15. ↑ Romanides 2002
16. ↑ Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 601.
17. ↑ Pugh 2015, p. 8.
18. ↑ What Does the Bible Really Teach?. Watch Tower Society. pp. 47-56. http://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/bible-teach/the-ransom-gods-greatest-gift.
19. ↑ Seventh-day Adventists Believe.... pp. 112-113. http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/27/27-09.htm.

## Sources

Primary sources

* Anselm (8 May 2008), "Cur Deus Homo", Anselm of Canterbury, Translated by Brian Davies & G R Evans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 260–356, ISBN 978-0-19-954008-2, https://books.google.com/books?id=jFKZKwAACAAJ, retrieved 2013-09-08
* Athanasius (1 December 2011), On the Incarnation, Translated by John Behr, Yonkers: St Vladimirs Seminary Press, ISBN 978-0-88141-409-7, https://books.google.com/books?id=zLaVpwAACAAJ, retrieved 2013-09-08
* Pelagius (1993), Pelagius's Commentary on St Paul's Epistle to the Romans, Translated by Theodore De Bruyn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-814399-4, https://books.google.com/books?id=rvnYAAAAMAAJ, retrieved 2013-09-08

Secondary sources

* Collins, Robin (1995), Understanding Atonement: A New and Orthodox Theory, Grantham: Messiah College, http://home.messiah.edu/~rcollins/Philosophical Theology/Atonement/AT7.HTM, retrieved 2013-09-08
* Hopko, Thomas (1972), The Orthodox Faith: Doctrine, 1, Department of Religious Education, The Orthodox Church in America, ISBN 978-0-86642-036-5, http://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/doctrine/the-symbol-of-faith/redemption, retrieved 2013-09-08
* Kent, William (1907), "Doctrine of the Atonement", The Catholic Encyclopedia, 2, New York: Robert Appleton Company, http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02055a.htm, retrieved 2013-09-08
* Pugh, Ben (2015), Atonement Theories: A Way through the Maze, James Clarke & Co
* Romanides, John (2002), The Ancestral Sin, Translated by George Gabriel, Zephyr Pub., ISBN 978-0-9707303-1-2, https://books.google.com/books?id=TttVAAAAYAAJ, retrieved 2013-09-08

* v
* t
* e

Adam and Eve

Source|

* Genesis creation narrative in the Book of Genesis
* Adam
* Eve

Offspring|

* Cain and Abel
* Aclima
* Seth
* Awan
* Azura

Television|

* "Probe 7, Over and Out" (1963)

Film|

* Mama's Affair (1921)
* Good Morning, Eve! (1934)
* The Broken Jug (1937)
* The Original Sin (1948)
* The Private Lives of Adam and Eve (1960)
* El pecado de Adán y Eva (1969)
* La Biblia en pasta (1984)
* The Annunciation (1984)
* Adipapam (1988)
* Adam (1992)
* Babs (2000)
* The Last Eve (2005)
* Year One (2009)
* The Tragedy of Man (2011)
* Adam and Dog (2011)
* Tropico (2013)

Plays|

* Le Jeu d'Adam (12th century)
* The Broken Jug (1808)
* The Tragedy of Man (1861)
* The Creation of the World and Other Business (1972)

Musicals|

* The Apple Tree (1966)
* Dude (1972)
* Up from Paradise (1973)
* Children of Eden (1991)

Compositions|

* The Creation (1798)
* structure
* La mort d'Adam (1809)
* Ève (1875)
* Genesis Suite (1945)
* Lilith (2001)

Literature|

* Apocalypse of Adam
* Book of Moses
* Book of Abraham
* Books of Adam
* Book of the Penitence of Adam
* Cave of Treasures
* "El y Ella"
* Genesis A and Genesis B
* Harrowing of Hell
* Life of Adam and Eve
* Testament of Adam
* Testimony of Truth (3rd century)
* Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan (6th century)
* "Old Saxon Genesis" (9th century)
* "Adam lay ybounden" (15th century)
* Paradise Lost (1667)
* Le Dernier Homme (1805)
* Extracts from Adam's Diary (1904)
* Eve's Diary (1905)
* The Book of Genesis (2009)
* The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve (2017)

Art|

* Bernward Doors (1015)
* Tapestry of Creation (11th century)
* Expulsion from the Garden of Eden (1425)
* Vienna Diptych (15th century)
* The Last Judgment (1482)
* The Garden of Earthly Delights (1504)
* Adam and Eve (1507)
* Paradise and Hell (1510)
* The Creation of Adam (1512)
* The Haywain Triptych (1516)
* Eve, the Serpent and Death (1510s or 1520s)
* Adam and Eve (1528)
* The Fall of Man (1550)
* The Garden of Eden with the Fall of Man (1617)
* The Fall of Man (1628)
* The Four Seasons (1660s)
* The Koren Picture-Bible (1692–1696)
* Paradise Lost (19th century)
* Expulsion from the Garden of Eden (1828)
* The First Mourning (1888)
* Adam and Eve (1905)
* Eve (1931)
* Adam and Eve (1932)
* The Serpent Chooses Adam and Eve (1958)

Songs|

* "Dese Bones G'wine Rise Again"
* "Adam-ondi-Ahman" (1835)
* "Forbidden Fruit" (1915)
* "The Garden of Eden" (1956)
* "Let's Give Adam and Eve Another Chance" (1970)
* "Man Gave Names to All the Animals" (1979)

Albums|

* The Cainian Chronicle (1996)
* Visions of Eden (2006)
* Snakes for the Divine (2010)

Other cultures|

* Adam–God doctrine
* Adam and Eve (LDS Church)
* Adam in Islam
* Adam in rabbinic literature
* Al-A'raf
* Book of Moses
* Endowment
* Manu (Hinduism)
* Mashya and Mashyana
* Serpent seed
* Tree of Jiva and Atman
* Tree of life (Quran)
* Our Lady of Endor Coven

Geography|

* Adam-ondi-Ahman
* Tomb of Eve

Biology|

* Mitochondrial Eve
* Y-chromosomal Adam
* The Real Eve

Story within a story|

* Doraemon: Nobita's Diary on the Creation of the World
* Island of Love
* The Visitors

Games|

* Demon: The Fallen (2002)

Related theology|

* Fall of man
* Original sin
* Garden of Eden
* Tree of the knowledge of good and evil
* Serpents in the Bible
* Forbidden fruit
* Apple
* Fig leaf
* Figs in the Bible
* Adam's ale
* Adamic language
* Camael
* Protevangelium
* Rosh Hashanah
* Seed of the woman
* Shamsiel
* Lilith
* Tree of life
* Allegorical interpretations of Genesis

Other|

* Pre-Adamite
* Generations of Adam
* Cave of the Patriarchs
* "In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela"
* "Simpsons Bible Stories"
* Second Time Lucky
* Adam and Eve cylinder seal
* Timeline of Genesis patriarchs
* Genealogies of Genesis
* Carnal knowledge
* Legend of the Rood
* Ystorya Adaf
* Ransom theory of atonement

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ransom theory of atonement. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Religion:Ransom_theory_of_atonement&oldid=4168462"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template