Science of team science

Short description: Field of scientific philosophy and methodology

This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. (September 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

Science of Team Science (SciTS) is a field of methodology focused on understanding and improving cross-disciplinary collaboration in research. The field encompasses conceptual and methodological strategies to understand how scientific teams can be organized to work more effectively.[1] SciTS initiatives aim to understand and manage factors that affect collaborative science and evaluate its outcomes.[2][3][4]

## Contents

* 1 History
* 2 Methods
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 Further reading
* 6 External links

## History

Since the 1990s, interest and large-scale funding for team-based research initiatives have increased, driven by efforts to tackle complex problems through cross-disciplinary collaboration.[2][5][6][7] Some argue that this trend reflects the growing recognition that addressing multifaceted challenges, such as climate change and public health issues, benefit from partnerships among scientists and practitioners from diverse fields.[5][6][8] One SciTS literature review highlighted team science as essential to inter-professional collaborative research[9] and called for its integration into health professions education and clinical practice at the University of Minnesota's NCIPE.

The interdisciplinary nature of SciTS initially emerged from practical concerns raised by funding agencies, which sought to assess the performance of Team Science, understand its added value, evaluate the return on investment in large research initiatives, and inform science policy.[2] The term "science of team science" was first introduced in October 2006 at a conference titled The Science of Team Science: Assessing the Value of Transdisciplinary Research, hosted by the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.[10] The SciTS field was further advanced in a supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine published in July 2008. Two years later, the First Annual International Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference was held on April 22–24, 2010, in Chicago, Illinois, organized by the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute.

In 2013, the National Academy of Sciences established a National Research Council Committee on the Science of Team Science to evaluate the current state of knowledge and practice in SciTS.[11] A committee report was later published in 2015.[12]

In 2023, Patrick Forscher and colleagues published a review identifying the benefits of big team science, noting that innovations facilitate the collection of larger samples and support efforts toward reproducibility and generalizability.[13][14] However, concerns exist that Team Science could increasingly influence funding priorities, potentially shifting emphasis from applied science to more theoretical research areas, as well as leading to unsuccessful large-scale projects.[15] Forscher's recommendations included creating an advisory board and structured bylaws, formalizing feedback mechanisms from contributors, engaging in mentoring, and separating idea generation from project implementation.[14]

## Methods

The definition of a successful team may vary, depending on stakeholders.[2] SciTS uses both qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the antecedent conditions, collaborative processes, and outcomes associated with team science, as well as the organizational, social, and political context that influences team science.[2]

A 2018 review of literature on SciTS published between 2006 and 2016 identified 109 articles. It reported that 75% of these articles used pre-existing data (e.g., archival data), 62% used bibliometrics, over 40% used surveys, and over 10% used interview and observational data.[16]

## See also

* Integrative learning
* Interactional expertise
* Interdisciplinarity
* Multidisciplinary
* Multidimensional network
* Transdisciplinary
* Global brain

## References

1. ↑ "About INSciTS". https://www.inscits.org/about-us.
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Stokols, Daniel; Hall, Kara L.; Taylor, Brandie K.; Moser, Richard P. (2008). "The Science of Team Science". American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2): S77–S89. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002. ISSN 0749-3797. PMID 18619407. https://webfiles.uci.edu/dstokols/Pubs/AJPM-Science of Team Science Intro.pdf?uniq=-ftp6c5. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
3. ↑ Stokols, Daniel; Misra, Shalini; Moser, Richard P.; Hall, Kara L.; Taylor, Brandie K. (2008). "The Ecology of Team Science". American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2): S96–S115. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003. ISSN 0749-3797. PMID 18619410. https://webfiles.uci.edu/dstokols/Pubs/AJPM-Ecology of Team Science.pdf?uniq=-ftp6bz. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
4. ↑ "System". http://thescienceofteams.com/index.php/tsot/system.
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Wuchty S; Jones BF; Uzzi B (2007). "The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.". Science 316 (5827): 1036–9. doi:10.1126/science.1136099. PMID 17431139. Bibcode: 2007Sci...316.1036W.
6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Jones BF; Wuchty S; Uzzi B (2008). "Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.". Science 322 (5905): 1259–62. doi:10.1126/science.1158357. PMID 18845711. Bibcode: 2008Sci...322.1259J.
7. ↑ Alessandroni, Nicolás; Altschul, Drew; Bazhydai, Marina; Byers-Heinlein, Krista; Elsherif, Mahmoud; Gjoneska, Biljana; Huber, Ludwig; Mazza, Valeria et al. (2024). "Comparative Cognition Needs Big Team Science: How Large-Scale Collaborations Will Unlock the Future of the Field". Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 19: 67–72. doi:10.3819/CCBR.2024.190001. http://comparative-cognition-and-behavior-reviews.org/vol19_alessandroni_et_al/.
8. ↑ Vlasceanu, Madalina; Doell, Kimberly C.; Bak-Coleman, Joseph B.; Todorova, Boryana; Berkebile-Weinberg, Michael M.; Grayson, Samantha J.; Patel, Yash; Goldwert, Danielle et al. (2024-02-09). "Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries" (in en). Science Advances 10 (6). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj5778. ISSN 2375-2548. PMID 38324680. Bibcode: 2024SciA...10J5778V.
9. ↑ Little, Meg M.; St Hill, Catherine A.; Ware, Kenric B.; Swanoski, Michael T.; Chapman, Scott A.; Lutfiyya, M. Nawal; Cerra, Frank B. (2017). "Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: A systematic review of the science of team science literature". Journal of Investigative Medicine 65 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1136/jim-2016-000216. ISSN 1081-5589. PMC 5284346. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/team-science-as-interprofessional-collaborative-research-practice.
10. ↑ "Science of Team Science". http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/scienceteam/index.html.
11. ↑ "The Science of Team Science". 2013-01-11. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BBCSS/CurrentProjects/DBASSE_080231.
12. ↑ Committee on the Science of Team Science; Board On Behavioral, Cognitive; Division of Behavioral Social Sciences Education; National Research, Council; Cooke, N. J.; Hilton, M. L. (2015-07-15). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/19007. ISBN 978-0-309-31682-8.
13. ↑ Köhler, Tine; Cortina, Jose M. (February 2021). "Play It Again, Sam! An Analysis of Constructive Replication in the Organizational Sciences" (in en). Journal of Management 47 (2): 488–518. doi:10.1177/0149206319843985. ISSN 0149-2063. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206319843985.
14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Forscher, Patrick S.; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan; Coles, Nicholas A.; Silan, Miguel Alejandro; Dutra, Natália; Basnight-Brown, Dana; IJzerman, Hans (May 2023). "The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science" (in en). Perspectives on Psychological Science 18 (3): 607–623. doi:10.1177/17456916221082970. ISSN 1745-6916. PMID 36190899. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916221082970.
15. ↑ Kreamer, Liana M.; Cobb, Haley R.; Castille, Christopher; Cogswell, Joshua (2024-02-01). "Big team science initiatives: A catalyst for trustworthy advancements in IO psychology". Acta Psychologica 242. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104101. ISSN 0001-6918. PMID 38064907.
16. ↑ Love, Hannah B.; Fosdick, Bailey K.; Cross, Jennifer E.; Suter, Meghan; Egan, Dinaida; Tofany, Elizabeth; Fisher, Ellen R. (2022-10-14). "Towards understanding the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful collaborations: a case-based team science study" (in en). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01388-x. ISSN 2662-9992. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01388-x.

## Further reading

* Azoulay P, Joshua S, Zivin JW (2010). "Superstar Extinction". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 125 (2): 549–589.
* Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S (2010). "Collaboration and team science: a field guide" (PDF). Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health. Accessed May 28, 2010.
* Börner, Katy; Dall'Asta, Luca; Ke, Weimao; Vespignani, Alessandro (2005). "Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams". Complexity 10 (4): 57–67. doi:10.1002/cplx.20078. ISSN 1076-2787. Bibcode: 2005Cmplx..10d..57B. http://cns.iu.edu/images/pub/2005-borner-studglob.pdf.
* Contractor, Noshir (2009). "The Emergence of Multidimensional Networks". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (3): 743–747. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01465.x. ISSN 1083-6101.
* Cummings JN. "A socio-technical framework for identifying team science collaborations that could benefit from cyberinfrastructure". VOSS: National Science Foundation; 2009.
* Patel MM, Moseley TW, Nia ES, Perez F, Kapoor MM, Whitman GJ. "Team Science: A Practical Approach to Starting Collaborative Projects." J Breast Imaging. 2021 Jun 16;3(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab034. PMID: 34805982; PMCID: PMC8599160.
* Stokols D, Taylor B, Hall K, Moser R (2006). "The science of team science: an overview of the field" (PDF). Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute. Accessed May 28, 2010.
* Rhoten D (2007). The dawn of networked science. The Chronicle Review. 54. Accessed May 28, 2010.

## External links

* Annual International Science of Team Science Conference
* National Cancer Institute Science of Team Science website

* v
* t
* e

Science and technology studies

Economics|

* Economics of science
* Economics of scientific knowledge

History|

* History and philosophy of science
* History of science
* and technology
* History of technology

Philosophy|

* Anthropocene
* Antipositivism
* Empiricism
* Fuzzy logic
* Neo-Luddism
* Philosophy of science
* Philosophy of social science
* Philosophy of technology
* Positivism
* Postpositivism
* Religion and science
* Scientism
* Social constructivism
* Social epistemology
* Transhumanism

Sociology|

* Actor–network theory
* Social
* construction of technology
* shaping of technology
* Sociology of knowledge
* scientific
* Sociology of scientific ignorance
* Sociology of the history of science
* Sociotechnology
* Strong programme

Science
studies|

* Antiscience
* Bibliometrics
* Boundary-work
* Consilience
* Criticism of science
* Demarcation problem
* Double hermeneutic
* Logology
* Mapping controversies
* Metascience
* Paradigm shift
* Pseudoscience
* Psychology of science
* Science
* citizen
* communication
* education
* normal
* post-normal
* rhetoric
* wars
* Scientific
* community
* consensus
* controversy
* dissent
* enterprise
* literacy
* method
* misconduct
* priority
* skepticism
* Scientocracy
* Scientometrics
* Team science
* Traditional knowledge
* ecological
* Unity of science
* Women in science
* STEM

Technology
studies|

* Co-production
* Cyborg anthropology
* Dematerialization
* Digital anthropology
* Digital media use and mental health
* Early adopter
* Hype cycle
* Innovation
* diffusion
* disruptive
* linear model
* system
* user
* Leapfrogging
* Normalization process theory
* Reverse salient
* Skunkworks project
* Sociotechnical system
* Technical change
* Technocracy
* Technoscience
* feminist
* Technological
* change
* convergence
* determinism
* revolution
* transitions
* Technology
* and society
* criticism of
* dynamics
* theories of
* transfer
* Engineering studies
* Women in engineering

Policy|

* Academic freedom
* Digital divide
* Evidence-based policy
* Factor 10
* Funding of science
* Science policy
* history of
* science of
* Politicization of science
* Regulation of science
* Research ethics
* Right to science
* Socio-scientific issues
* Technology assessment
* Technology policy
* Transition management

* Portals
* Science
* History of science
* Technology
* Category
* Associations
* Journals
* Scholars

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science of team science. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Science_of_team_science&oldid=4158200"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template