Concentrated disadvantage

Short description: Sociological term based on socioeconomic status of neighborhoods

Sociology

* History
* Outline
* Portal:Society
* By country

Main theories

* Conflict theory
* Structural functionalism
* Symbolic interactionism
* Critical theory
* Positivism
* Social change
* Social constructionism

Methods

* Quantitative
* Qualitative
* Comparative
* Computational
* Ethnographic
* Conversation analysis
* Historical
* Interview
* Mathematical
* Network analysis
* Survey

Major subfields

* Criminology
* Culture
* Demography
* Development
* Deviance
* Economic
* Education
* Environmental
* Family
* Feminist
* Gender
* Health
* Immigration
* Industrial
* Inequality
* Knowledge
* Law
* Literature
* Medical
* Military
* Organizational
* Political
* Race and ethnicity
* Religion
* Rural
* Science
* Social movements
* Social psychology in sociology
* Stratification
* Technology
* Terrorism
* Urban

Browse

* Bibliography
* Index
* Journals
* Organizations
* People
* Timeline

* v
* t
* e

A concentrated disadvantage is a sociological term for the cumulative, spatially clustered presence of multiple forms of socioeconomic hardship within a neighborhood or small geographic area. It captures not just poverty, but the intensity and co-occurrence of structural conditions—such as joblessness, reliance on public assistance, family instability, and demographic isolation—that become mutually reinforcing when they are geographically concentrated. It is structural and rooted in macroeconomic and demographic forces and policies. Importantly, disadvantage is concentrated in space and produces neighborhood-level effects. Its spatial clustering shapes local institutions, social networks, collective efficacy, and exposure to violence. The neighborhood, not the individual household, is the unit where disadvantage accumulates and operates.

William Julius Wilson (especially in The Truly Disadvantaged, 1987) laid the theoretical foundation by describing how economic restructuring and racial segregation produced high-poverty, highly isolated neighborhoods.[1] Robert J. Sampson, along with collaborators such as Stephen Raudenbush and Jeffrey Morenoff, formalized the term in empirical research. In their 1997–2001 studies,[2][3][4] they operationalized an index of concentrated disadvantage using census measures like poverty rate, unemployment, single-parent households, and public assistance.

Concentrated disadvantage is one of several structural indices used to capture the socioeconomic conditions of neighborhoods; it is often examined alongside related measures such as concentrated affluence, residential stability, and immigrant concentration. Researchers also employ broader inequality metrics—most notably the Index of Concentration at the Extremes, which reflects the spatial separation of affluence and deprivation.[5][6] Together, these indices describe complementary dimensions of neighborhood structure and context, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of how place-based conditions shape social, economic, and health outcomes.

## Contents

* 1 Associations and effects
* 2 Measurement
* 3 See also
* 4 References

## Associations and effects

A substantial body of research documents links between concentrated disadvantage and a range of negative outcomes. It is essential, however, to interpret these associations with the structural nature of disadvantage in mind: these patterns arise from macro-level forces and neighborhood conditions shaped by policy, segregation, and economic change—not from the individual behaviors or characteristics of residents.

Residents of neighborhoods characterized by concentrated disadvantage experience worse physical and mental health across the life course, including higher rates of chronic disease, infant mortality, and physiological stress.[7][8] These health disparities reflect both material hardship and the cumulative biological strain associated with living in persistently deprived environments.

Concentrated disadvantage has been found to be positively related to homicide rates and reduces probability of high school completion.[9][10] A positive association between concentrated disadvantage and rates of violence more generally has also been found; this relationship is mediated primarily by collective efficacy.[2] Neighborhood disadvantage is consistently linked to increased police contact, arrest, and incarceration, even after accounting for individual factors.[11][12] These patterns reflect both elevated exposure to crime and heightened surveillance and control in disadvantaged communities.[3] There is also evidence that juvenile court officials perceive more disadvantaged neighborhoods as more dangerous, and so are less likely to release youth from such neighborhoods into their communities.[13]

Child development is enhanced the most in neighborhoods with approximately equal amounts of concentrated disadvantage and affluence.[14] Children growing up in disadvantaged neighborhoods tend to exhibit lower academic achievement, reduced school readiness, and higher dropout rates.[15][16][17] Longitudinal evidence shows that sustained exposure to such environments can have lasting effects on cognitive development and educational attainment.[18]

Long-term studies show that children raised in neighborhoods with concentrated disadvantage experience reduced upward mobility and poorer adult outcomes, including lower earnings and greater criminal justice involvement.[19][20] These effects accumulate across generations, reinforcing persistent spatial inequality.[21]

## Measurement

Concentrated disadvantage is typically measured using composite indices derived from neighborhood-level census variables. There is no single universal formula for concentrated disadvantage and different studies use slightly different sets of census variables.

Sampson and colleagues[2] developed an index where concentrated disadvantage is calculated based on five metrics. These metrics are:

1. Percent of individuals below the poverty line
2. Percent of individuals on public assistance
3. Percent female-headed households,
4. Percent unemployed, and
5. Percent less than age 18.[22]

Other researchers use a related but expanded set of indicators—such as welfare receipt, poverty, unemployment, female-headed households, racial composition, and the density of children—to capture the structural features of neighborhood disadvantage.[23][24] Not all scholars include racial composition because it can confound race with structural disadvantage.

## See also

* Concentrated poverty

## References

1. ↑ "Wilson, William Julius: The Truly Disadvantaged", Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory (2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.), 2010, ISBN 978-1-4129-5918-6, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959193.n282, retrieved 2025-12-05
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Sampson, Robert J.; Raudenbush, Stephen W.; Earls, Felton (1997-08-15). "Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy" (in en). Science 277 (5328): 918–924. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 9252316.
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Sampson, Robert J.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. (November 1999). "Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods". American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 603–651. doi:10.1086/210356. ISSN 0002-9602. https://doi.org/10.1086/210356.
4. ↑ Sampson, Robert J.; Morenoff, Jeffrey D.; Gannon-Rowley, Thomas (August 2002). "Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research". Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 443–478. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114. ISSN 0360-0572. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114.
5. ↑ "The Prodigal Paradigm Returns: Ecology Comes Back to Sociology", Does It Take A Village? (Psychology Press): pp. 53–60, 2001-01-01, ISBN 978-1-4106-0014-1, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600141-10, retrieved 2025-12-05
6. ↑ Krieger, Nancy; Waterman, Pamela D.; Spasojevic, Jasmina; Li, Wenhui; Maduro, Gil; Van Wye, Gretchen (February 2016). "Public Health Monitoring of Privilege and Deprivation With the Index of Concentration at the Extremes". American Journal of Public Health 106 (2): 256–263. doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302955. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 4815605. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302955.
7. ↑ Krieger, Nancy; Chen, Jarvis T.; Waterman, Pamela D.; Rehkopf, David H.; Subramanian, S. V. (October 2003). "Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Monitoring Socioeconomic Gradients in Health: A Comparison of Area-Based Socioeconomic Measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project". American Journal of Public Health 93 (10): 1655–1671. doi:10.2105/ajph.93.10.1655. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 1448030. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.10.1655.
8. ↑ Gustafsson, Per E.; San Sebastian, Miguel; Janlert, Urban; Theorell, Töres; Westerlund, Hugo; Hammarström, Anne (May 2014). "Life-Course Accumulation of Neighborhood Disadvantage and Allostatic Load: Empirical Integration of Three Social Determinants of Health Frameworks". American Journal of Public Health 104 (5): 904–910. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301707. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 3987591. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301707.
9. ↑ Wodtke, Geoffrey T.; Harding, David J.; Elwert, Felix (2011-10-01). "Neighborhood Effects in Temporal Perspective: The Impact of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on High School Graduation" (in en). American Sociological Review 76 (5): 713–736. doi:10.1177/0003122411420816. ISSN 0003-1224. PMID 22879678.
10. ↑ Becker, Jacob H. (2016-03-01). "The Dynamics of Neighborhood Structural Conditions: The Effects of Concentrated Disadvantage on Homicide over Time and Space" (in en). City & Community 15 (1): 64–82. doi:10.1111/cico.12152. ISSN 1540-6040.
11. ↑ Sampson, Robert J.; Loeffler, Charles (July 2010). "Punishment's place: the local concentration of mass incarceration". Daedalus 139 (3): 20–31. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00020. ISSN 0011-5266. PMC 3043762. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00020.
12. ↑ Kirk, David S.; Papachristos, Andrew V. (November 2011). "Cultural Mechanisms and the Persistence of Neighborhood Violence". American Journal of Sociology 116 (4): 1190–1233. doi:10.1086/655754. ISSN 0002-9602. https://doi.org/10.1086/655754.
13. ↑ Rodriguez, Nancy (2013-05-01). "Concentrated Disadvantage and the Incarceration of Youth: Examining How Context Affects Juvenile Justice" (in en). Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 50 (2): 189–215. doi:10.1177/0022427811425538. ISSN 0022-4278.
14. ↑ Carpiano, Richard M.; Lloyd, Jennifer E. V.; Hertzman, Clyde (2009-08-01). "Concentrated affluence, concentrated disadvantage, and children's readiness for school: A population-based, multi-level investigation". Social Science & Medicine 69 (3): 420–432. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.028. PMID 19540643.
15. ↑ Wodtke, Geoffrey T.; Harding, David J.; Elwert, Felix (2011-09-20). "Neighborhood Effects in Temporal Perspective". American Sociological Review 76 (5): 713–736. doi:10.1177/0003122411420816. ISSN 0003-1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420816.
16. ↑ Leventhal, Tama; Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (2000). "The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes.". Psychological Bulletin 126 (2): 309–337. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.2.309. ISSN 0033-2909. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.2.309.
17. ↑ Wodtke, Geoffrey T.; Yildirim, Ugur; Harding, David J.; Elwert, Felix (2023-03-01). "Are Neighborhood Effects Explained by Differences in School Quality?". American Journal of Sociology 128 (5): 1472–1528. doi:10.1086/724279. ISSN 0002-9602. https://doi.org/10.1086/724279.
18. ↑ Sampson, Robert J.; Sharkey, Patrick; Raudenbush, Stephen W. (2008-01-22). "Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (3): 845–852. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710189104. ISSN 0027-8424. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710189104.
19. ↑ Sharkey, Patrick (2013). Stuck in Place. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-92425-0. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924267.001.0001.
20. ↑ Chetty, Raj; Hendren, Nathaniel; Katz, Lawrence F. (2016-04-01). "The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment". American Economic Review 106 (4): 855–902. doi:10.1257/aer.20150572. ISSN 0002-8282. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572.
21. ↑ Chetty, Raj; Hendren, Nathaniel (December 2016). ﻿The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I: Childhood Exposure Effects﻿ (Report). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23001.
22. ↑ "Life Course Indicator: Concentrated Disadvantage". http://www.amchp.org/programsandtopics/data-assessment/LifeCourseIndicatorDocuments/LC-06_ConcentratedDisad_Final-4-24-2014.pdf.
23. ↑ Krivo, L. J.; Peterson, R. D. (1996-12-01). "Extremely Disadvantaged Neighborhoods and Urban Crime" (in en). Social Forces 75 (2): 619–648. doi:10.1093/sf/75.2.619. ISSN 0037-7732. https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/sf/75.2.619.
24. ↑ Sampson, Robert J.; Sharkey, Patrick; Raudenbush, Stephen W. (2008-01-22). "Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (3): 845–852. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710189104. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 18093915.

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated disadvantage. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Concentrated_disadvantage&oldid=4234254"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template