Right of conquest

Short description: Concept in political science

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article or section appears to be slanted towards recent events. Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and add more content related to non-recent events. (July 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

(Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Part of a series on

War

History

* Prehistoric
* Ancient
* Post-classical

* Early modern

* Late modern
* industrial
* fourth-gen

Battlespace

* Air
* Cyber
* Information
* Space

* Land

* Cold-region
* Desert
* Jungle
* Mountain
* Urban

* Sea

* Amphibious
* Blue
* Brown
* Green
* Surface
* Underwater

Weapons

* Armor
* Artillery
* Biological
* Cavalry
* Chemical
* Conventional
* Cyber
* Denial
* Disinformation
* Electronic
* Infantry
* Lawfare
* Music
* Nuclear
* Psychological
* Unconventional
* Refugees as weapons

Tactics

* Aerial
* Battle
* Cavalry
* Charge
* Counterattack
* Counter-insurgency
* Cover
* Defeat in detail
* Foxhole
* Guerrilla
* Morale
* Rapid dominance
* Siege
* Swarming
* Tactical objective
* Target saturation
* Trench
* Withdrawal

Operational

* Blitzkrieg
* Deep operation
* Maneuver
* Operational manoeuvre group

Strategy

* Attrition
* Defence in depth
* Counter-offensive
* Fabian
* Mosaic
* Deception
* Defensive
* Goal
* Naval
* Offensive
* Scorched earth

Grand strategy

* Containment
* Economic
* Limited
* Science
* Philosophy
* Political
* Religious
* Strategic
* Technology
* Theater
* Theory
* Total war

Organization

* Command and control
* Doctrine
* Engineers
* Intelligence
* Ranks
* Technology and equipment

Personnel

* Military recruitment
* Conscription
* Recruit training
* Military specialism
* Women in the military
* Children in the military
* Transgender people and military service
* Sexual harassment in the military
* Conscientious objection
* Counter recruitment

Logistics

* Military–industrial complex
* Arms industry
* Materiel
* Supply chain management

Related

* Demilitarisation
* Asymmetric warfare
* Broken-Backed War Theory
* Court-martial
* Cold war
* Deterrence theory
* Horses in warfare
* Irregular warfare
* Law of war
* Mercenary
* Military campaign
* Military operation
* Network-centric warfare
* Operations research
* Principles of war
* Proxy war
* Security dilemma
* Tripwire force
* War crime
* War film
* War game
* War novel
* Wartime sexual violence
* Women in war
* World war
* Colonial war
* Endemic warfare
* Lanchester's laws

Lists

* Battles
* Military occupations
* Military tactics
* Operations
* Sieges
* War crimes
* Wars
* Weapons
* Writers

* v
* t
* e

Property law

Part of the common law series
Types

* Real property
* Personal property
* Community property
* Unowned property

Acquisition

* Gift
* Adverse possession
* Deed
* Conquest
* Discovery
* Accession
* Lost, mislaid, and abandoned property
* Treasure trove
* Bailment
* License
* Alienation

Estates in land

* Allodial title
* Fee simple
* Fee tail

Life estate
* Defeasible estate
* Future interest
* remainder
* Concurrent estate
* Leasehold estate
* Condominiums
* Real estate

Conveyancing

* Bona fide purchaser
* Torrens title

Strata title
* Deeds registration
* Estoppel by deed
* Quitclaim deed
* Mortgage
* Equitable conversion
* Action to quiet title
* Escheat

Future use control

* Restraint on alienation
* Rule against perpetuities
* Rule in Shelley's Case
* Doctrine of worthier title

Nonpossessory interest

* Lien
* Easement
* Profit
* Usufruct
* Covenant
* Equitable servitude

Related topics

* Fixtures
* Waste
* Partition
* Practicing without a license

Property rights
* Mineral rights
* Water rights
* prior appropriation
* riparian
* Lateral and subjacent support
* Assignment
* Nemo dat
* Quicquid plantatur
* Conflict of property laws
* Blackacre
* Security deposit

Other common law areas

* Contract law
* Tort law
* Wills, trusts and estates
* Criminal law
* Evidence

* * *

Higher category: Law and Common law

* v
* t
* e

The right of conquest is a claimed right of ownership to land acquired through possession by force of arms. Once recognized as a principle of international law, the right of conquest declined during the 20th century, particularly following World War II, the Nuremberg principles, and the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations (UN), which prohibited the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of states.[1] Since the Charter came into effect, states using military force have commonly justified their actions as self-defense or collective defense.[2]

## Contents

* 1 History and arguments
* 2 Conquest and military occupation
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 4.1 Works cited

## History and arguments

Proponents[who?] state that the right of conquest acknowledges the status quo and that denial of the right is meaningless unless one is able and willing to use military force to oppose it.[citation needed] Further, the right was traditionally accepted because the conquering force, being by definition stronger than any lawfully entitled governance which it may have replaced, was, therefore, more likely to secure peace and stability for the people, and so the right of conquest legitimizes the conqueror towards that end.[citation needed]

The completion of the colonial conquest of much of the world (see New Imperialism), the devastation of World War I and World War II, and the alignment of both the United States and the Soviet Union with the principle of self-determination led to the abandonment of the right of conquest in formal international law.[citation needed] The 1928 Kellogg–Briand Pact, the post-1945 Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials, the UN Charter, and the UN's role in decolonization contributed to the progressive dismantling of this principle. The UN Charter guarantees the "territorial integrity" of member states, but enforcement difficulties in the 21st century[3] have lead to contentious debate over the possible re-emergence of the right of conquest in international law.[4]

## Conquest and military occupation

Until 1945, the disposition of territory acquired under the principle of conquest had to be conducted according to the existing laws of war. This meant that there had to be military occupation followed by a peace settlement, and there was no reasonable chance of the defeated sovereign regaining the land. While a formal peace treaty "makes good any defects in title",[5] it was not required. Recognition by the losing party was not a requirement: "the right of acquisition vested by conquest did not depend on the consent of the dispossessed state".[6] However, the alternative was annexation (in part or in whole), which, if protested as unlawful, a peace treaty was the only means to legitimize conquest in a time of war.Template:Awk Essentially, conquest itself was a legal act of extinguishing the legal rights of other states without their consent. Under this framework, it is notable that conquest and subsequent occupation outside of war were illegal.[6]

In the post–World War II era, not all wars involving territorial acquisitions ended in a peace treaty. For example, the fighting in the Korean War paused with an armistice, without any peace treaty covering it. As of 2026[update], North Korea is still technically at war with South Korea and the United States.[7]

## See also

* Colonialism
* Conquest
* Debellatio
* Discovery doctrine
* Fait accompli
* Franz Oppenheimer's "conquest theory" of the state
* Imperialism
* Invasion
* Jungle justice
* Just war theory
* Mandate of Heaven
* Manifest destiny
* Might makes right
* Prize (law)
* Prize of war
* Realism (international relations)
* Revanchism
* Responsibility to protect
* Roerich Pact
* Status quo ante bellum
* Survival of the fittest
* Uti possidetis
* Vae victis
* War of aggression
* War trophy

## References

1. ↑ "Charter of the United Nations". United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text.
2. ↑ Silke Marie Christiansen (2016). Climate Conflicts – A Case of International Environmental and Humanitarian Law. Springer. p. 153. ISBN 9783319279459. https://books.google.com/books?id=BKcqDAAAQBAJ.
3. ↑ Jeria, Michelle Bachelet (2016). "The Challenges to International Law in the 21st Century" (in en). Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 110: 3–11. doi:10.1017/S0272503700102435. ISSN 0272-5037. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-asil-annual-meeting/article/abs/challenges-to-international-law-in-the-21st-century/B4EC8B1CF5B483DB5368FF77F44452CE.
4. ↑ Mulligan, Michael (2020). "The Re-Emergence of Conquest: International Law and the Legitimate Use of Force". Liverpool Law Review 41 (3): 293–313. doi:10.1007/s10991-020-09250-3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10991-020-09250-3. Retrieved 2026-05-12.
5. ↑ Korman 1996, p. 127.
6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Korman 1996, p. 128.
7. ↑ "The Korean War never technically ended. Here's why.". June 24, 2020. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/why-korean-war-never-technically-ended.

### Works cited

* Korman, Sharon (1996). The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-828007-6.

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right of conquest. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Right_of_conquest&oldid=4426269"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template