Socialism

Short description: Sociopolitical economic philosophy and system

Part of a series on

Socialism

Development

* Age of the Enlightenment
* French Revolution
* History of socialism
* Revolutions of 1848
* Socialist calculation debate
* Socialist economics

Ideas

* Calculation in kind
* Collective ownership
* Cooperative
* Common ownership
* Commune (model of government)
* Economic democracy
* Economic planning
* Equal opportunity
* Free association
* Freed market
* Industrial democracy
* Input–output model
* Internationalism
* Labor-time calculation
* Labour voucher
* Material balance planning
* Organizational self-management
* Peer‑to‑peer economics
* Production for use
* Sharing economy
* Social dividend
* Social ownership
* Socialism in one country
* Socialist mode of production
* To each according to his contribution/needs
* Workplace democracy

Models

* Communalism
* Participatory economics
* Democratic confederalism
* Market economy
* Market socialism
* Lange model
* Mutualism
* Socialist market economy
* Socialist-oriented market
* Planned economy
* Decentralized planning
* Inclusive Democracy
* OGAS
* Project Cybersyn
* Soviet-type
* Social ecology

Variants

* 21st-century
* African
* Arab
* Agrarian
* Anarchism
* Authoritarian
* Blanquism
* Chinese
* Communism
* Democratic
* Ethical
* Ecological
* Feminist
* Fourierism
* Free-market
* Gandhian
* Guild
* Laissez-faire
* Liberal
* Libertarian
* Marhaenism
* Marxism
* Municipal
* Nationalist
* Owenism
* Reformist
* Religious
* Revolutionary
* Ricardian
* Saint-Simonianism
* Scientific
* Social democracy
* State
* Syndicalism
* Third World
* Utopian
* Zionist

By country

* Australia
* Bangladesh
* Brazil
* Canada
* China
* Communist China
* Nationalist China
* Estonia
* Greece
* Hong Kong
* India
* Iran
* Italy
* Netherlands
* New Zealand
* Pakistan
* Sri Lanka
* Tunisia
* United Kingdom
* United States
* Vietnam

People

* More
* Hall
* Saint-Simon
* Babeuf
* Owen
* Fourier
* Thompson
* Hodgskin
* Cabet
* Enfantin
* Proudhon
* Blanc
* Herzen
* Bakunin
* Marx
* Barmby
* Engels
* Lassalle
* Morris
* Jones
* Kropotkin
* Bernstein
* Malatesta
* Taylor
* Lavrov
* Lenin
* Jaurès
* Plekhanov
* Dewey
* Barone
* Kautsky
* Du Bois
* Goldman
* Luxemburg
* Blum
* Tawney
* Russell
* Neurath
* Pannekoek
* Recabarren
* Einstein
* Trotsky
* Keller
* Attlee
* Polanyi
* Makhno
* Cole
* Nagy
* Gerhardsen
* Orwell
* Dougals
* Senghor
* Erlander
* Allende
* Kreisky
* Mitterrand
* Nasser
* Mandela
* Bookcin
* Dubček
* Zinn
* Castoriadis
* Thompson
* Manley
* Chomsky
* King
* Pertini
* Craxi
* Layton
* West
* Sanders
* Ali
* Öcalan
* Žižek
* Hedges
* Corbyn
* Varoufakis

Organizations

* First International
* Second International
* Third International
* Fourth International
* Fifth International
* Labour and
Socialist International
* Socialist International
* World Federation of Democratic
Youth
* International Union of Socialist
Youth
* World Socialist Movement
* International Committee of the
Fourth International
* Progressive Alliance

Related topics

* Anarchism
* Capitalism
* Communist society
* Criticism of capitalism
* Criticism of socialism
* Economic calculation problem
* Economic system
* French Left
* Left-libertarianism
* Libertarianism
* List of socialists
* List of socialist economists
* Marxist philosophy
* Nanosocialism
* Progressivism
* Socialism and LGBT rights
* Socialist calculation debate
* Socialist Party
* Socialist state
* Types of socialism

*   *   *

* v
* t
* e

Part of the Politics series

Party politics
Political spectrum
|  Left-wing

*     * Far-left
* Centre-left

Centre

*     * Centre-left
* Radical centre
* Centre-right

Right-wing

*     * Centre-right
* Far-right

Party platform

* Anarchist
* Communist
* Socialist
* Social-democratic
* Progressive
* Liberal
* Libertarian
* Republican
* Syncretic
* Democrat
* Populist
* Globalist
* Internationalist
* Environmentalist
* Green
* Third Way
* Conservative
* Royalist
* Monarchist
* Nationalist
* Statist
* Capitalist
* Fascist
* Imperialist

Party organization

* Cadre party
* Cartel party
* Catch-all party
* Entrepreneurial party
* Mass party

Party Leadership

* Party Leader
* Party Secretary
* Party Chair
* Party spokesperson

Party system

* Non-partisan
* One-party

* Dominant-party
* Two-party
* Multi-party

Coalition

* Ruling party
* Opposition party
* Hung parliament
* Confidence and supply
* Minority government
* Majority government
* Rainbow coalition
* Grand coalition
* Full coalition

* National unity government

Lists

* Ruling parties by country
* Political parties by region
* Political ideologies

Politics portal

* v
* t
* e

Part of a series on

Economic systems

By ideology

* Anarchist
* Capitalist
* Corporate
* Dirigist
* Laissez-faire
* Mercantilist
* Neo-mercantilist
* Protectionist
* Social market
* State capitalist
* Democratic
* Fascist
* Feminist
* Georgist
* Green
* Religious
* Christian
* Islamic
* Socialist
* Market socialist
* Mutualist
* Participatory
* Socialist market
* Socialist oriented market
* Syndicalist
* Social credit
* Traditionalist
* Communalist
* Corporatist
* Distributist
* Feudalism

By coordination

* Closed (autarky)
* Decentralized
* Digital
* Dual
* Gift
* Informal
* Market
* Mixed
* Natural
* Open
* Planned
* Robinson Crusoe
* Subsistence
* Underground
* Vertical archipelago
* Virtual

By regional model

* Asian
* East Asian
* Chinese
* Singaporean
* European
* Anglo-Saxon
* German
* Nordic
* Rhenish
* Soviet

* Latin America
* Socialism of the 21st century

Sectors

* Common ownership
* Private
* Public
* Voluntary

Property types

* Collective ownership
* Commons
* Private property
* State ownership
* Social ownership

Transition

* Collectivization
* Communization
* Corporatization
* Demutualization
* Deregulation
* Expropriation
* Financialization
* Liberalization
* Marketization
* Municipalization
* Mutualization
* Nationalization
* Privatization
* Socialization

Coordination

* Barter
* Market
* Free
* Open
* Regulated
* Planning
* In kind
* Cybernetics
* Indicative
* Material balancing
* Price
* Self-managed
* Peer-to-peer
* Sharing
* Open access

Other types

* Commons-based peer production
* Expeditionary
* Hunter-gatherer
* Inclusive Democracy
* Information
* Manorialism
* Newly industrialized
* Palace
* Plantation
* Plutonomy
* Post-capitalist
* Post-industrial
* Post-scarcity
* Resource-based
* Token
* Traditional
* Transition
* World

* v
* t
* e

Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems[1] characterised by social ownership of the means of production,[2] as opposed to private ownership.[3][4][5] It describes the economic, political, and social theories and movements associated with the implementation of such systems.[6] Social ownership can take various forms including: public, community, collective, cooperative,[7][8][9] or employee.[10][11] No single definition encapsulates the many types of socialism,[12] but social ownership is the common element.[4][13] Traditionally, socialism is on the left-wing of the political spectrum.[14] Types of socialism vary based on the role of markets and planning in resource allocation, the structure of management in organizations, and different approaches from below or from above. Some socialists favour a party, state, or technocratic-driven approach, while others disagree on whether government is the correct vehicle for change.[15][16]

Socialist systems divide into non-market and market forms.[17] Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets with integrated economic planning and engineering, or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism.[18] A non-market socialist system seeks to eliminate the perceived inefficiencies, irrationalities, unpredictability, and crises that socialists traditionally associate with capital accumulation and the profit system.[19] Market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend.[20][21][22]

Socialist parties and ideas remain a political force with varying degrees of power and influence, heading national governments in several countries. Socialist politics have been internationalist and nationalist; organised through political parties and opposed to party politics; at times overlapping with trade unions and other times independent and critical of them, and present in industrialised and developing nations.[23]

Social democracy originated within the socialist movement,[24] supporting economic and social interventions to promote social justice.[25][26] While retaining socialism as a long-term goal,[27] in the post-war period social democracy embraced a mixed economy based on Keynesianism within a predominantly developed capitalist market economy and liberal democratic polity that expands state intervention to include income redistribution, regulation, and a welfare state.[28] Economic democracy proposes a sort of market socialism, with more democratic control of companies, investments and natural resources.[29]

The socialist political movement includes political philosophies that originated in the revolutionary movements of the mid-to-late 18th century and out of concern for the social problems that socialists associated with capitalism.[12] By the late 19th century, after the work of Karl Marx and his collaborator Friedrich Engels, socialism had come to signify anti-capitalism and advocacy for a post-capitalist system based on some form of social ownership of the means of production.[30][31] By the early 1920s, communism and social democracy had become the two dominant political tendencies within the international socialist movement,[32] with socialism itself becoming the most influential secular movement of the 20th century.[33] Many socialists also adopted the causes of other social movements, such as feminism, environmentalism, and progressivism.[34]

While the emergence of the Soviet Union as the world's first nominally socialist state led to socialism's widespread association with the Soviet economic model, several scholars posit that in practice, the model functioned as a form of state capitalism.[35][36][37] Several academics, political commentators, and scholars have noted that some Western European countries have been governed by socialist parties or have mixed economies that are sometimes called "democratic socialist".[38][39] Following the revolutions of 1989, many of these countries have moved away from socialism as a neoliberal consensus replaced the social democratic consensus in the advanced capitalist world,[40] while many former socialist politicians and political parties embraced "Third Way" politics, remaining committed to equality and welfare, while abandoning public ownership and class-based politics.[41] Socialism experienced a resurgence in popularity in the 2010s, most prominently in the form of democratic socialism.[42][43]

## Contents

* 1 Etymology
* 2 History
* 2.1 Early socialism
* 2.1.1 Paris Commune
* 2.2 First International
* 2.3 Second International
* 2.4 Early 20th century
* 2.4.1 Russian Revolution
* 2.4.2 Third International and the revolutionary wave
* 2.4.3 4th World Congress of the Communist International
* 2.4.4 The Second International and the Two-and-a-Half International
* 2.5 From the Great Depression to the World War
* 2.5.1 Spanish Civil War
* 2.6 Mid-20th century
* 2.6.1 Post-World War II
* 2.6.2 Nordic countries
* 2.6.3 Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
* 2.6.4 Asia, Africa, and Latin America
* 2.6.5 New Left
* 2.6.6 Protests of 1968
* 2.7 Late 20th century
* 2.8 Early 21st century
* 3 Social and political theory
* 3.1 Criticism of capitalism
* 3.2 Marxism
* 3.3 Role of the state
* 3.4 Utopian versus scientific
* 3.5 Reform versus revolution
* 4 Economics
* 4.1 Planned economy
* 4.2 Self-managed economy
* 4.3 State-directed economy
* 4.4 Market socialism
* 5 Politics
* 5.1 Anarchism
* 5.2 Democratic socialism and social democracy
* 5.3 Ethical and liberal socialism
* 5.4 Leninism and precedents
* 5.5 Libertarian socialism
* 5.6 Religious socialism
* 5.7 Social movements
* 5.8 Syndicalism
* 6 Public views
* 7 Criticism
* 8 See also
* 9 References
* 9.1 Bibliography
* 10 Further reading
* 11 External links

## Etymology

For Andrew Vincent, "[t]he word 'socialism' finds its root in the Latin sociare, which means to combine or to share. The related, more technical term in Roman and then medieval law was societas. This latter word could mean companionship and fellowship as well as the more legalistic idea of a consensual contract between freemen".[44]

Utopian socialist pamphlet of Rudolf Sutermeister

Initial use of socialism was claimed by Pierre Leroux, who alleged he first used the term in the Parisian journal Le Globe in 1832.[45][46] Leroux was a follower of Henri de Saint-Simon, one of the founders of what would later be labelled utopian socialism. Socialism contrasted with the liberal doctrine of individualism that emphasized the moral worth of the individual while stressing that people act or should act as if they are in isolation from one another. The original utopian socialists condemned this doctrine of individualism for failing to address social concerns during the Industrial Revolution, including poverty, oppression, and vast wealth inequality. They viewed their society as harming community life by basing society on competition. They presented socialism as an alternative to liberal individualism based on the shared ownership of resources.[47] Saint-Simon proposed economic planning, scientific administration and the application of scientific understanding to the organisation of society. By contrast, Robert Owen proposed to organise production and ownership via cooperatives.[47][48] Socialism is also attributed in France to Marie Roch Louis Reybaud while in Britain it is attributed to Owen, who became one of the fathers of the cooperative movement.[49][50]

The definition and usage of socialism settled by the 1860s, replacing associationist, co-operative, mutualist and collectivist that had been used as synonyms while communism fell out of use during this period.[51] An early distinction between communism and socialism was that the latter aimed to only socialise production while the former aimed to socialise both production and consumption (in the form of free access to final goods).[52] By 1888, Marxists employed socialism in place of communism as the latter had come to be considered an old-fashioned synonym for socialism. It was not until after the Bolshevik Revolution that socialism was appropriated by Vladimir Lenin to mean a stage between capitalism and communism. He used it to defend the Bolshevik program from Marxist criticism that Russia's productive forces were not sufficiently developed for communism.[53] The distinction between communism and socialism became salient in 1918 after the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party renamed itself to the All-Russian Communist Party, interpreting communism specifically to mean socialists who supported the politics and theories of Bolshevism, Leninism and later that of Marxism–Leninism,[54] although communist parties continued to describe themselves as socialists dedicated to socialism.[55] According to The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx, "Marx used many terms to refer to a post-capitalist society—positive humanism, socialism, communism, realm of free individuality, free association of producers, etc. He used these terms completely interchangeably. The notion that 'socialism' and 'communism' are distinct historical stages is alien to his work and only entered the lexicon of Marxism after his death".[56]

In Christian Europe, communists were believed to have adopted atheism. In Protestant England, communism was too close to the Roman Catholic communion rite, hence socialist was the preferred term.[57] Engels wrote that in 1848, when The Communist Manifesto was published, socialism was respectable in Europe while communism was not. The Owenites in England and the Fourierists in France were considered respectable socialists while working-class movements that "proclaimed the necessity of total social change" denoted themselves communists.[58] This branch of socialism produced the communist work of Étienne Cabet in France and Wilhelm Weitling in Germany.[59] British moral philosopher John Stuart Mill discussed a form of economic socialism within a liberal context that would later be known as liberal socialism. In later editions of his Principles of Political Economy (1848), Mill posited that "as far as economic theory was concerned, there is nothing in principle in economic theory that precludes an economic order based on socialist policies"[60][61] and promoted substituting capitalist businesses with worker cooperatives.[62] While democrats looked to the Revolutions of 1848 as a democratic revolution which in the long run ensured liberty, equality, and fraternity, Marxists denounced it as a betrayal of working-class ideals by a bourgeoisie indifferent to the proletariat.[63]

## History

Main article: Social:History of socialism

### Early socialism

Charles Fourier, influential early French socialist thinker

Socialist models and ideas espousing common or public ownership have existed since antiquity. The economy of the 3rd century BCE Mauryan Empire of India, an absolute monarchy, has been described by some scholars as "a socialized monarchy" and "a sort of state socialism" due to "nationalisation of industries".[64][65] Other scholars have suggested that elements of socialist thought were present in the politics of classical Greek philosophers Plato[66] and Aristotle.[67] Mazdak the Younger (died c. 524 or 528 CE), a Persian communal proto-socialist,[68] instituted communal possessions and advocated the public good. Abu Dharr al-Ghifari, a Companion of Muhammad, is credited by multiple authors as a principal antecedent of Islamic socialism.[69][70] The teachings of Jesus are frequently described as socialist, especially by Christian socialists.[71] However, both socialists and non-socialists have disputed claims of Jesus being a socialist.[72][73] In the Bible, Acts 4:32–35 records that the first Jewish Christian communities were organized along the principles of common ownership and redistribution of goods,[74] although the pattern soon disappears from church history except within monasticism. Christian socialism was one of the founding threads of the British Labour Party and is claimed to begin with the uprising of Wat Tyler and John Ball in the 14th century CE.[75] After the French Revolution , activists and theorists such as François-Noël Babeuf, Étienne-Gabriel Morelly, Philippe Buonarroti and Auguste Blanqui influenced the early French labour and socialist movements.[76] In Britain, Thomas Paine proposed a detailed plan to tax property owners to pay for the needs of the poor in Agrarian Justice[77] while Charles Hall wrote The Effects of Civilization on the People in European States, denouncing capitalism's effects on the poor of his time.[78] This work influenced the utopian schemes of Thomas Spence.[79]

The first self-conscious socialist movements developed in the 1820s and 1830s. Groups such as the Fourierists, Owenites and Saint-Simonians provided a series of analyses and interpretations of society. Especially the Owenites overlapped with other working-class movements such as the Chartists in the United Kingdom.[80] This was also the first time that the term socialism itself applies in a fashion recognisably similar to its modern meaning; the word was first used in 1827 in the London Cooperative Magazine in the UK and later in 1832 in the French periodical Le Globe.[81] An earlier usage of the word socialism appears in the Italian language in 1803, but not with the modern meaning of the term.[82]

The Chartists gathered significant numbers around the People's Charter of 1838 which sought democratic reforms focused on the extension of suffrage to all male adults. Leaders in the movement called for a more equitable distribution of income and better living conditions for the working classes. The first trade unions and consumer cooperative societies followed the Chartist movement.[83] Pierre-Joseph Proudhon proposed his philosophy of mutualism in which "everyone had an equal claim, either alone or as part of a small cooperative, to possess and use land and other resources as needed to make a living".[41] Other currents inspired Christian socialism "often in Britain and then usually coming out of left liberal politics and a romantic anti-industrialism"[76] which produced theorists such as Edward Bellamy, Charles Kingsley and Frederick Denison Maurice.[84]

The first advocates of socialism favoured social levelling in order to create a meritocratic or technocratic society based on individual talent.[85] Henri de Saint-Simon was fascinated by the potential of science and technology and advocated a socialist society that would eliminate the disorderly aspects of capitalism based on equal opportunities.[86][unreliable source?] He sought a society in which each person was ranked according to his or her capacities and rewarded according to his or her work.[85] His key focus was on administrative efficiency and industrialism and a belief that science was essential to progress.[87] This was accompanied by a desire for a rationally organised economy based on planning and geared towards large-scale scientific and material progress.[85]

West European social critics, including Louis Blanc, Charles Fourier, Charles Hall, Robert Owen, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Saint-Simon were the first modern socialists who criticised the poverty and inequality of the Industrial Revolution. They advocated reform, Owen advocating the transformation of society to small communities without private property. Owen's contribution to modern socialism was his claim that individual actions and characteristics were largely determined by their social environment.[87] On the other hand, Fourier advocated Phalanstères (communities that respected individual desires, including sexual preferences), affinities and creativity and saw that work has to be made enjoyable for people.[88] Owen and Fourier's ideas were practiced in intentional communities around Europe and North America in the mid-19th century.

#### Paris Commune

The celebration of the election of the Commune on 28 March 1871—the Paris Commune was a major early implementation of socialist ideas.

The Paris Commune was a government that ruled Paris from 18 March (formally, from 28 March) to 28 May 1871. The Commune was the result of an uprising in Paris after France was defeated in the Franco-Prussian War. The Commune elections were held on 26 March. They elected a Commune council of 92 members, one member for each 20,000 residents.[89]

Because the Commune was able to meet on fewer than 60 days in total, only a few decrees were actually implemented. These included the separation of church and state; the remission of rents owed for the period of the siege (during which payment had been suspended); the abolition of night work in the hundreds of Paris bakeries; the granting of pensions to the unmarried companions and children of National Guards killed on active service; and the free return of all workmen's tools and household items valued up to 20 francs that had been pledged during the siege.[90]

### First International

Main article: Organization:International Workingmen's Association

Mikhail Bakunin speaking to members of the International Workingmen's Association at the Basel Congress in 1869 Karl Marx in 1875

In 1864, the First International was founded in London. It united diverse revolutionary currents, including socialists such as the French followers of Proudhon,[91] Blanquists, Philadelphes, English trade unionists and social democrats. In 1865 and 1866, it held a preliminary conference and had its first congress in Geneva, respectively. Due to their wide variety of philosophies, conflict immediately erupted. The first objections to Marx came from the mutualists who opposed state socialism. Shortly after Mikhail Bakunin and his followers joined in 1868, the First International became polarised into camps headed by Marx and Bakunin.[92] The clearest differences between the groups emerged over their proposed strategies for achieving their visions. The First International became the first major international forum for the promulgation of socialist ideas.

Bakunin's followers were called collectivists and sought to collectivise ownership of the means of production while retaining payment proportional to the amount and kind of labour of each individual. Like Proudhonists, they asserted the right of each individual to the product of his labour and to be remunerated for his particular contribution to production. By contrast, anarcho-communists sought collective ownership of both the means and the products of labour. As Errico Malatesta put it, "instead of running the risk of making a confusion in trying to distinguish what you and I each do, let us all work and put everything in common. In this way each will give to society all that his strength permits until enough is produced for every one; and each will take all that he needs, limiting his needs only in those things of which there is not yet plenty for every one".[93] Anarcho-communism as a coherent economic-political philosophy was first formulated in the Italian section of the First International by Malatesta, Carlo Cafiero, Emilio Covelli, Andrea Costa and other ex-Mazzinian republicans.[94] Out of respect for Bakunin, they did not make their differences with collectivist anarchism explicit until after his death.[95]

Syndicalism emerged in France inspired in part by Proudhon and later by Pelloutier and Georges Sorel.[96] It developed at the end of the 19th century out of the French trade-union movement (syndicat is the French word for trade union). It was a significant force in Italy and Spain in the early 20th century until it was crushed by the fascist regimes in those countries. In the United States, syndicalism appeared in the guise of the Industrial Workers of the World, or "Wobblies", founded in 1905.[96] Syndicalism is an economic system that organises industries into confederations (syndicates)[97] and the economy is managed by negotiation between specialists and worker representatives of each field, comprising multiple non-competitive categorised units.[98] Syndicalism is a form of communism and economic corporatism, but also refers to the political movement and tactics used to bring about this type of system. An influential anarchist movement based on syndicalist ideas is anarcho-syndicalism.[99] The International Workers Association is an international anarcho-syndicalist federation of various labour unions.

The Fabian Society is a British socialist organisation established to advance socialism via gradualist and reformist means.[100] The society laid many foundations of the Labour Party and subsequently affected the policies of states emerging from the decolonisation of the British Empire, most notably India and Singapore. Originally, the Fabian Society was committed to the establishment of a socialist economy, alongside a commitment to British imperialism as a progressive and modernising force.[101] Later, the society functioned primarily as a think tank and is one of fifteen socialist societies affiliated with the Labour Party. Similar societies exist in Australia (the Australian Fabian Society), in Canada (the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation and the now disbanded League for Social Reconstruction) and in New Zealand.

Guild socialism is a political movement advocating workers' control of industry through the medium of trade-related guilds "in an implied contractual relationship with the public".[102] It originated in the United Kingdom and was at its most influential in the first quarter of the 20th century. Inspired by medieval guilds, theorists such as Samuel George Hobson and G. D. H. Cole advocated the public ownership of industries and their workforces' organisation into guilds, each of which under the democratic control of its trade union. Guild socialists were less inclined than Fabians to invest power in a state.[96] At some point, like the American Knights of Labor, guild socialism wanted to abolish the wage system.[103]

### Second International

Main article: Organization:Second International

As the ideas of Marx and Engels gained acceptance, particularly in central Europe, socialists sought to unite in an international organisation. In 1889 (the centennial of the French Revolution), the Second International was founded, with 384 delegates from twenty countries representing about 300 labour and socialist organisations.[104] Engels was elected honorary president at the third congress in 1893. Anarchists were banned, mainly due to pressure from Marxists.[105] It has been argued that at some point the Second International turned "into a battleground over the issue of libertarian versus authoritarian socialism. Not only did they effectively present themselves as champions of minority rights; they also provoked the German Marxists into demonstrating a dictatorial intolerance which was a factor in preventing the British labour movement from following the Marxist direction indicated by such leaders as H. M. Hyndman".[105]

Reformism arose as an alternative to revolution. Eduard Bernstein was a leading social democrat in Germany who proposed the concept of evolutionary socialism. Revolutionary socialists quickly targeted reformism: Rosa Luxemburg condemned Bernstein's Evolutionary Socialism in her 1900 essay Social Reform or Revolution? Revolutionary socialism encompasses multiple social and political movements that may define "revolution" differently. The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) became the largest and most powerful socialist party in Europe, despite working illegally until the anti-socialist laws were dropped in 1890. In the 1893 elections, it gained 1,787,000 votes, a quarter of the total votes cast, according to Engels. In 1895, the year of his death, Engels emphasised The Communist Manifesto's emphasis on winning, as a first step, the "battle of democracy".[106]

In South America, the Socialist Party of Argentina was established in the 1890s led by Juan B. Justo and Nicolás Repetto, among others. It was the first mass party in the country and in Latin America. The party affiliated itself with the Second International.[107]

### Early 20th century

For four months in 1904, Australian Labor Party leader Chris Watson was the Prime Minister of the country. Watson thus became the head of the world's first socialist or social democratic parliamentary government.[108] Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey argues that the Labor Party was not socialist at all in the 1890s, and that socialist and collectivist elements only made their way in the party's platform in the early 20th century.[109]

In 1909, the first Kibbutz was established in Palestine[110] by Russian Jewish Immigrants. The Kibbutz Movement expanded through the 20th century following a doctrine of Zionist socialism.[111] The British Labour Party first won seats in the House of Commons in 1902.

Antonio Gramsci, member of the Italian Socialist Party and later leader and theorist of the Communist Party of Italy

By 1917, the patriotism of World War I changed into political radicalism in Australia, most of Europe and the United States. Other socialist parties from around the world who were beginning to gain importance in their national politics in the early 20th century included the Italian Socialist Party, the French Section of the Workers' International, the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party, the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party and the Socialist Party in Argentina, the Socialist Workers' Party in Chile and the Socialist Party of America in the United States.

#### Russian Revolution

In February 1917, a revolution occurred in Russia. Workers, soldiers and peasants established soviets (councils), the monarchy fell and a provisional government convened pending the election of a constituent assembly. In April of that year, Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik faction of socialists in Russia and known for his profound and controversial expansions of Marxism, was allowed to cross Germany to return from exile in Switzerland.

Lenin had published essays on his analysis of imperialism, the monopoly and globalisation phase of capitalism, as well as analyses on social conditions. He observed that as capitalism had further developed in Europe and America, the workers remained unable to gain class consciousness so long as they were too busy working to pay their expenses. He therefore proposed that the social revolution would require the leadership of a vanguard party of class-conscious revolutionaries from the educated and politically active part of the population.[112]

Upon arriving in Petrograd, Lenin declared that the revolution in Russia had only begun, and that the next step was for the workers' soviets to take full authority. He issued a thesis outlining the Bolshevik programme, including rejection of any legitimacy in the provisional government and advocacy for state power to be administered through the soviets. The Bolsheviks became the most influential force. On 7 November, the capitol of the provisional government was stormed by Bolshevik Red Guards in what later was officially known in the Soviet Union as the Great October Socialist Revolution. The provisional government ended and the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic—the world's first constitutionally socialist state—was established. On 25 January 1918, Lenin declared "Long live the world socialist revolution!" at the Petrograd Soviet[113] and proposed an immediate armistice on all fronts and transferred the land of the landed proprietors, the crown and the monasteries to the peasant committees without compensation.[114]

Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union and the leader of the Bolshevik party.

Leon Trotsky, founder of the Red Army and a key figure in the October Revolution.

The day after assuming executive power on 25 January, Lenin wrote Draft Regulations on Workers' Control, which granted workers control of businesses with more than five workers and office employees and access to all books, documents and stocks and whose decisions were to be "binding upon the owners of the enterprises".[115] Governing through the elected soviets and in alliance with the peasant-based Left Socialist-Revolutionaries, the Bolshevik government began nationalising banks and industry; and disavowed the national debts of the deposed Romanov royal régime. It sued for peace, withdrawing from World War I and convoked a Constituent Assembly in which the peasant Socialist-Revolutionary Party (SR) won a majority.[116] Lenin's government also instituted a number of progressive measures such as universal education, universal healthcare and equal rights for women.[117][118]

The Constituent Assembly elected SR leader Victor Chernov President of a Russian republic, but rejected the Bolshevik proposal that it endorse the Soviet decrees on land, peace and workers' control and acknowledge the power of the Soviets of Workers', Soldiers' and Peasants' Deputies. The next day, the Bolsheviks declared that the assembly was elected on outdated party lists[119] and the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the Soviets dissolved it.[120][121] In March 1919, world communist parties formed Comintern (also known as the Third International) at a meeting in Moscow.[122]

In the interwar period, Soviet Union experienced two major famines.[undue weight? - discuss] The First famine occurred in 1921–1922 with death estimates varying between 1 and 10 million dead. It was caused by a combination of factors – severe drought and failed harvests, continuous war since 1914, forced collectivisation of farms and requisition of grain and seed from peasants (preventing the sowing of crops) by the Soviet authorities, and an economic blockade of the Soviet Union by the Allies. The experience with the famine led Lenin to replace war communism with the New Economic Policy (NEP) in 1921 to alleviate the extreme shortages.[123] Under the NEP, private ownership was allowed for small and medium-sized enterprises. While large industry remained state controlled.

A second major famine occurred in 1930–1933, resulting in millions of deaths.

The Soviet economy was the modern world's first centrally planned economy. It adopted state ownership of industry managed through Gosplan (the State Planning Commission), Gosbank (the State Bank) and the Gossnab (State Commission for Materials and Equipment Supply). Economic planning was conducted through serial Five-Year Plans. The emphasis was on development of heavy industry at expense of agriculture. Rapid industrialization served two purposes: to bring largely agrarian societies into the modern age, and to establish a politically loyal working class. Modernization brought about a general increase in the standard of living in the 1950s and 60's.[124]

#### Third International and the revolutionary wave

Main articles: Organization:Communist International and Social:Revolutions of 1917–1923

Rosa Luxemburg, prominent Marxist revolutionary and martyr of the German Spartacist uprising in 1919

The Bolshevik Russian Revolution of January 1918 launched Communist parties in many countries and a wave of revolutions until the mid-1920s. Few communists doubted that the Russian experience depended on successful, working-class socialist revolutions in developed capitalist countries.[125][126] In 1919, Lenin and Leon Trotsky organised the world's Communist parties into an international association of workers—the Communist International (Comintern), also called the Third International.

The Russian Revolution influenced uprisings in other countries. The German Revolution of 1918–1919 replaced Germany's imperial government with a republic. The revolution lasted from November 1918 until the establishment of the Weimar Republic in August 1919. It included an episode known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic[127][128][129][130] and the Spartacist uprising. A short lived Hungarian Soviet Republic was set up in Hungary March 21 to August 1, 1919. It was led by Béla Kun.[131][132][133][page needed] It instituted a Red Terror.[134][page needed] After the regime was put down, an even more brutal White Terror followed. Kun managed to escape to the Soviet Union, where he co-led murder of tens of thousands of White Russians.[135][136] He was killed in the 1930 Soviet purges.[137][138]

In Italy, the events known as the Biennio Rosso[139][140] were characterised by mass strikes, worker demonstrations and self-management experiments through land and factory occupations. In Turin and Milan, workers' councils were formed and many factory occupations took place led by anarcho-syndicalists organised around the Unione Sindacale Italiana.[141]

There was a short-lived Persian Socialist Soviet Republic in 1920–21. Patagonia Rebelde was a syndicalist-led revolution in Argentina lasting for a year and a half from in 1920–21. The anarchist-led Guangzhou City Commune in China lasted six years from 1921. In 1924, the Mongolian People's Republic was established and was ruled by the Mongolian People's Party. The Shinmin Prefecture in Manchuria lasted two years from 1929. Many of these revolutions initiated societies and economic models that have been described as socialist.[142]

#### 4th World Congress of the Communist International

In 1922, the fourth congress of the Communist International took up the policy of the united front. It urged communists to work with rank-and-file social democrats while remaining critical of their leaders. They criticised those leaders for betraying the working class by supporting the capitalists' war efforts. The social democrats pointed to the dislocation caused by revolution and later the growing authoritarianism of the communist parties. The Labour Party rejected the Communist Party of Great Britain's application to affiliate to them in 1920.

On seeing the Soviet State's growing coercive power in 1923, a dying Lenin said Russia had reverted to "a bourgeois tsarist machine ... barely varnished with socialism".[143] After Lenin's death in January 1924, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union—then increasingly under the control of Joseph Stalin —rejected the theory that socialism could not be built solely in the Soviet Union in favour of the concept of socialism in one country. Stalin developed a bureaucratic and totalitarian government, which was condemned by democratic socialists and anarchists for undermining the Revolution's ideals.[144][145]

The Russian Revolution and its aftermath motivated national Communist parties elsewhere that gained political and social influence, such as those in France, the United States, Italy, China, Mexico, Brazil, Chile. and Indonesia.

Left-wing groups which did not agree to the centralisation and abandonment of the soviets by the Bolshevik Party (see anti-Stalinist left) led left-wing uprisings against the Bolsheviks. Such groups included Socialist Revolutionaries,[146] Left Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks and anarchists.[147] Within this left-wing discontent, the most large-scale events were the Kronstadt rebellion[148][149][150] and the Makhnovist movement.[151][152][153]

#### The Second International and the Two-and-a-Half International

The International Socialist Commission (ISC, also known as Berne International) was formed in February 1919 at a meeting in Bern by parties that wanted to resurrect the Second International.[154] Centrist socialist parties which did not want to be a part of the resurrected Second International (ISC) or Comintern formed the International Working Union of Socialist Parties (IWUSP, also known as Vienna International, Vienna Union, or Two-and-a-Half International) on 27 February 1921 at a conference in Vienna.[155] The ISC and the IWUSP joined to form the Labour and Socialist International (LSI) in May 1923 at a meeting in Hamburg.[156]

### From the Great Depression to the World War

The 1920s and 1930s were marked by an increasing divergence between democratic and reformists socialists (mainly affiliated with the Labour and Socialist International) and revolutionary socialists (mainly affiliated with the Communist International), but also by tension within the Communist movement between the dominant Stalinists and dissidents such as Trotsky's followers in the Left Opposition. Trotsky's Fourth International was established in France in 1938 when Trotskyists argued that the Comintern or Third International had become irretrievably "lost to Stalinism" and thus incapable of leading the working class to power.[157]

#### Spanish Civil War

FAI militia during the Spanish Revolution in 1936

In the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), socialists (including the democratic socialist Spanish Socialist Workers' Party and the Marxist Workers' Party of Marxist Unification) participated on the Republican side, loyal to the left-leaning Popular Front government of the Second Spanish Republic, in alliance with anarchists of the communist and syndicalist variety and supported by the socialist Workers' General Union.[158]

The Spanish Revolution of 1936 was a workers' social revolution during the war, that is often seen as a model of socialism from below.[159][160] An anarchist-inspired movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of Barcelona and of large areas of rural Spain where they collectivised the land.[161] The Spanish Revolution was a workers' social revolution that began with the Spanish Civil War in 1936 and resulted in the widespread implementation of anarchist and more broadly libertarian socialist organisational principles in some areas for two to three years, primarily Catalonia, Aragon, Andalusia and parts of Levante. Much of Spain's economy came under worker control. In anarchist strongholds like Catalonia the figure was as high as 75%, but lower in areas with heavy Communist Party influence, which actively resisted attempts at collectivisation. Factories were run through worker committees, agrarian areas became collectivised and run as libertarian communes. Anarchist historian Sam Dolgoff estimated that about eight million people participated directly or indirectly in the Spanish Revolution.[162]

### Mid-20th century

#### Post-World War II

Main articles: History:Cold War and Social:Post-war consensus

The rise of Nazism and the start of World War II led to the dissolution of the LSI in 1940. After the War, the Socialist International was formed in Frankfurt in July 1951 as its successor.[163]

After World War II, social democratic governments introduced social reform and wealth redistribution via welfare and taxation. Social democratic parties dominated post-war politics in countries such as France, Italy, Czechoslovakia, Belgium and Norway . At one point, France claimed to be the world's most state-controlled capitalist country. It nationalised public utilities including Charbonnages de France (CDF), Électricité de France (EDF), Gaz de France (GDF), Air France, Banque de France and Régie Nationale des Usines Renault.[164]

In 1945, the British Labour Party led by Clement Attlee was elected based on a radical socialist programme. The Labour government nationalised industries including mines, gas, coal, electricity, rail, iron, steel and the Bank of England. British Petroleum was officially nationalised in 1951.[165] Anthony Crosland said that in 1956 25% of British industry was nationalised and that public employees, including those in nationalised industries, constituted a similar proportion of the country's workers.[166] The Labour Governments of 1964–1970 and 1974–1979 intervened further.[167] It re-nationalised British Steel (1967) after the Conservatives had denationalised it and nationalised British Leyland (1976).[168] The National Health Service provided taxpayer-funded health care to everyone, free at the point of service.[169] Working-class housing was provided in council housing estates and university education became available via a school grant system.[170]

#### Nordic countries

Einar Gerhardsen, Prime Minister of Norway for the Labour Party

During most of the post-war era, Sweden was governed by the Swedish Social Democratic Party largely in cooperation with trade unions and industry.[171] The party held power from 1936 to 1976, 1982 to 1991, 1994 to 2006 and 2014 to 2022, most often in minority governments. Party leader Tage Erlander led the government from 1946 to 1969, the longest uninterrupted parliamentary government. These governments substantially expanded the welfare state.[172] Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme identified as a "democratic socialist"[173] and was described as a "revolutionary reformist".[174]

The Norwegian Labour Party was established in 1887 and was largely a trade union federation. The party did not proclaim a socialist agenda, elevating universal suffrage and dissolution of the union with Sweden as its top priorities. In 1899, the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions separated from the Labour Party. Around the time of the Russian Revolution, the Labour Party moved to the left and joined the Communist International from 1919 through 1923. Thereafter, the party still regarded itself as revolutionary, but the party's left-wing broke away and established the Communist Party of Norway while the Labour Party gradually adopted a reformist line around 1930. In 1935, Johan Nygaardsvold established a coalition that lasted until 1945.[175]

From 1946 to 1962, the Norwegian Labour Party held an absolute majority in the parliament led by Einar Gerhardsen, who remained Prime Minister for seventeen years. Although the party abandoned most of its pre-war socialist ideas, the welfare state was expanded under Gerhardsen to ensure the universal provision of basic human rights and stabilise the economy.[176] In the 1945 Norwegian parliamentary election, the Communist Party took 12% of the votes, but it largely vanished during the Cold War.[177] In the 1950s, popular socialism emerged in Nordic countries. It placed itself between communism and social democracy.[178] In the early 1960s, the Socialist Left Party challenged the Labour Party from the left.[175] Also in the 1960s, Gerhardsen established a planning agency and tried to establish a planned economy.[176] In the 1970s, a more radical socialist party, the Worker's Communist Party (AKP), broke from the Socialist Left Party and had notable influence in student associations and some trade unions. The AKP identified with Communist China and Albania rather than the Soviet Union.[179]

Olof Palme, Prime Minister of Sweden for the Swedish Social Democratic Party

In countries such as Sweden, the Rehn–Meidner model[180] allowed capitalists owning productive and efficient firms to retain profits at the expense of the firms' workers, exacerbating inequality and causing workers to agitate for a share of the profits in the 1970s. At that time, women working in the state sector began to demand better wages. Rudolf Meidner established a study committee that came up with a 1976 proposal to transfer excess profits into worker-controlled investment funds, with the intention that firms would create jobs and pay higher wages rather than reward company owners and managers.[87] Capitalists immediately labeled this proposal as socialism and launched an unprecedented opposition—including calling off the class compromise established in the 1938 Saltsjöbaden Agreement.[181] Social democratic parties are some of the oldest such parties and operate in all Nordic countries. Countries or political systems that have long been dominated by social democratic parties are often labelled social democratic.[182][183] Those countries fit the social democratic type of "high socialism" which is described as favouring "a high level of decommodification and a low degree of stratification".[184]

The Nordic model is a form of economic-political system common to the Nordic countries (Denmark , Finland , Iceland, Norway and Sweden). It has three main ingredients, namely peaceful, institutionalised negotiation between employers and trade unions; active, predictable and measured macroeconomic policy; and universal welfare and free education. The welfare system is governmental in Norway and Sweden whereas trade unions play a greater role in Denmark, Finland and Iceland.[185][186][187][188] The Nordic universal welfare model is often labelled social democratic and contrasted with the selective continental model and the residual Anglo-American model.[189] Major reforms in the Nordic countries are the results of consensus and compromise across the political spectrum. Key reforms were implemented under social democratic cabinets in Denmark, Norway and Sweden while centre-right parties dominated during the implementation of the model in Finland and Iceland. Since World War II, Nordic countries have largely maintained a social democratic mixed economy, characterised by labour force participation, gender equality, egalitarian and universal benefits, redistribution of wealth and expansionary fiscal policy.[176][185][190] In 2015, then-Prime Minister of Denmark Lars Løkke Rasmussen denied that Denmark is socialist, saying "I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy".[191]

In Norway, the first mandatory social insurances were introduced by conservative cabinets in 1895 (Francis Hagerups's cabinet) and 1911 (Konow's Cabinet). During the 1930s, the Labour Party adopted the conservatives' welfare state project. After World War II, all political parties agreed that the welfare state should be expanded. Universal social security (Folketrygden) was introduced by the conservative Borten's Cabinet.[192][193] Norway's economy is open to the international or European market for most products and services, joining the European Union's internal market in 1994 through European Economic Area. Some of the mixed economy institutions from the post-war period were relaxed by the conservative cabinet of the 1980s and the finance market was deregulated.[194] Within the Varieties of Capitalism-framework, Finland, Norway and Sweden are identified as coordinated market economies.[195]

#### Soviet Union and Eastern Europe

The Soviet era saw competition between the Soviet-led Eastern Bloc and the United States-led Western Bloc. The Soviet system was seen as a rival of and a threat to Western capitalism for most of the 20th century.[196][page needed]

The Eastern Bloc was the group of Communist states of Central and Eastern Europe, including the Soviet Union and the countries of the Warsaw Pact,[197][198][199] including Poland, the German Democratic Republic, the Hungary, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Albania, and initially Yugoslavia. In the Informbiro period from 1948, Yugoslavia under Josip Broz Tito pursued a different, more decentralised form of state socialism than the rest of the Eastern Bloc, known as Socialist self-management.

The Hungarian Revolution of 1956, a spontaneous nationwide revolt against the Communist government brutally suppressed by Soviet forces, and USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev's denunciation of the excesses of Stalin's regime during the Twentieth Communist Party Congress the same year[200] produced disunity within Western European Communist parties,[201][202][203][204] leading to the emergence of the New Left (see below). Over a decade later, Czechoslovakia under Alexander Dubček also attempted to pursue a more democratic model of state socialism, under the name "Socialism with a human face", during the Prague Spring; this was also brutally suppressed by the Soviet Union.

#### Asia, Africa, and Latin America

In the post-war years, socialism became increasingly influential in many then-developing countries. Embracing Third World socialism, countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America often nationalised industries. During India's freedom movement and fight for independence, many figures in the left-wing faction of the Indian National Congress organised themselves as the Congress Socialist Party. Their politics and those of the early and intermediate periods of Jayaprakash Narayan's career combined a commitment to the socialist transformation of society with a principled opposition to the one-party authoritarianism they perceived in the Stalinist model.[205]

The Chinese Communist Revolution was the second stage in the Chinese Civil War, which ended with the establishment of the People's Republic of China led by the Chinese Communist Party. The then-Chinese Kuomintang Party in the 1920s incorporated Chinese socialism as part of its ideology.[206][207] Between 1958 and 1962 during the Great Leap Forward in the People's Republic of China, some 30 million people starved to death[208] and at least 45 million died overall.[209]

The emergence of this new political entity in the frame of the Cold War was complex and painful. Several tentative efforts were made to organise newly independent states to establish a common front to limit the United States' and the Soviet Union's influence on them. This led to the Sino-Soviet split. The Non-Aligned Movement gathered around the figures of Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Sukarno of Indonesia, Josip Broz Tito of Yugoslavia and Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. After the 1954 Geneva Conference which ended the French war in Vietnam, the 1955 Bandung Conference gathered Nasser, Nehru, Tito, Sukarno and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai.[210] As many African countries gained independence during the 1960s, some of them rejected capitalism in favour of African socialism as defined by Julius Nyerere of Tanzania, Léopold Senghor of Senegal, Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana and Sékou Touré of Guinea.[211]

The Cuban Revolution (1953–1959) was an armed revolt conducted by Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement and its allies against the government of Fulgencio Batista. Castro's government eventually adopted socialism and the communist ideology, becoming the Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965.[212][213][214]

In Indonesia in the mid-1960s, a coup attempt blamed on the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) was countered by an anti-communist purge led by Suharto, which mainly targeted the growing influence of the PKI and other leftist groups, with significant support from the United States, which culminated in the overthrow of Sukarno.[215] These events resulted not only in the total destruction of the PKI but also the political left in Indonesia, and paved the way for a major shift in the balance of power in Southeast Asia towards the West, a significant turning point in the global Cold War.[216][217][218]

#### New Left

Main article: Social:New Left

The New Left was a term used mainly in the United Kingdom and United States in reference to activists, educators and others in the 1960s and 1970s who sought to implement a broad range of reforms on issues such as gay rights, abortion, gender roles and drugs[219] in contrast to earlier leftist or Marxist movements that had taken a more vanguardist approach to social justice and focused mostly on labour unionisation and questions of social class.[220][221][222] The New Left rejected involvement with the labour movement and Marxism's historical theory of class struggle.[223]

In the United States, the New Left was associated with the Hippie movement and anti-war college campus protest movements as well as the black liberation movements such as the Black Panther Party.[224] While initially formed in opposition to the "Old Left" Democratic Party, groups composing the New Left gradually became central players in the Democratic coalition.[219]

#### Protests of 1968

The protests of 1968 represented a worldwide escalation of social conflicts, predominantly characterised by popular rebellions against military, capitalist and bureaucratic elites who responded with an escalation of political repression. These protests marked a turning point for the civil rights movement in the United States which produced revolutionary movements like the Black Panther Party. The prominent civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. organised the "Poor People's Campaign" to address issues of economic justice,[225] while personally showing sympathy with democratic socialism.[226] In reaction to the Tet Offensive, protests also sparked a broad movement in opposition to the Vietnam War all over the United States and even into London, Paris, Berlin and Rome. In 1968, the International of Anarchist Federations was founded during a conference held in Carrara by the three existing European federations of France, the Italian and the Iberian Anarchist Federation as well as the Bulgarian federation in French exile.

Mass socialist movements grew not only in the United States, but also in most European countries. In many other capitalist countries, struggles against dictatorships, state repression and colonisation were also marked by protests in 1968, such as the Tlatelolco massacre in Mexico City and the escalation of guerrilla warfare against the military dictatorship in Brazil.

Countries governed by Communist parties saw protests against bureaucratic and military elites too. In Eastern Europe, widespread protests escalated particularly in the Prague Spring in Czechoslovakia. In response, Soviet Union occupied Czechoslovakia. The occupation was denounced by the Italian and French[227] Communist parties and the Communist Party of Finland, but defended by the Portuguese Communist Party secretary-general Álvaro Cunhal[228] the Communist Party of Luxembourg[227] and conservative factions of the Communist Party of Greece.[227]

In the Chinese Cultural Revolution, a socio-political youth movement mobilised against "bourgeois" elements which were seen to be infiltrating the government and society at large, aiming to restore capitalism. This movement motivated Maoism-inspired movements around the world in the context of the Sino-Soviet split.

### Late 20th century

Salvador Allende, President of Chile and member of the Socialist Party of Chile, whose presidency and life were ended by a CIA-backed military coup[229]

In the 1960s, a socialist tendency within the Latin American Catholic church appeared and was known as liberation theology[230][231] It motivated the Colombian priest Camilo Torres Restrepo to enter the ELN guerrilla. In Chile, Salvador Allende, a physician and candidate for the Socialist Party of Chile, was elected president in 1970. In 1973, his government was ousted by the United States-backed military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, which lasted until the late 1980s.[232] In Jamaica, the democratic socialist[233] Michael Manley served as the fourth Prime Minister of Jamaica from 1972 to 1980 and from 1989 to 1992. According to opinion polls, he remains one of Jamaica's most popular Prime Ministers since independence.[234]

The Nicaraguan Revolution encompassed the rising opposition to the Somoza dictatorship in the 1960s and 1970s, the campaign led by the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) to violently oust the dictatorship in 1978–1979, the subsequent efforts of the FSLN to govern Nicaragua from 1979 until 1990[235] and the socialist measures which included wide-scale agrarian reform[236][237] and educational programs.[238] The People's Revolutionary Government was proclaimed on 13 March 1979 in Grenada which was overthrown by armed forces of the United States in 1983. The Salvadoran Civil War (1979–1992) was a conflict between the military-led government of El Salvador and the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN), a coalition or umbrella organisation of five socialist guerrilla groups. A coup on 15 October 1979 led to the killings of anti-coup protesters by the government as well as anti-disorder protesters by the guerrillas and is widely seen as the tipping point towards the civil war.[239]

In 1976, the word socialist was added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd amendment Act during the Emergency, implying both social and economic equality.[240]

In 1982, the newly elected French socialist government of François Mitterrand nationalised parts of a few key industries, including banks and insurance companies.[241] Eurocommunism was a trend in the 1970s and 1980s in various Western European Communist parties to develop a theory and practice of social transformation that was more relevant for a Western European country and less aligned to the influence or control of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Outside Western Europe, it is sometimes called neocommunism.[242]

Some Communist parties with strong popular support, notably the Italian Communist Party (PCI) and the Communist Party of Spain (PCE). adopted Eurocommunism most enthusiastically and the Communist Party of Finland was dominated by Eurocommunists. The French Communist Party (PCF) and many smaller parties strongly opposed Eurocommunism and stayed aligned with the Communist Party of the Soviet Union until the end of the Soviet Union. Also emerging from the Communist movement but moving in a more left-wing direction, in Italy Autonomia Operaia was particularly active from 1976 to 1978; it took an important role in the autonomist movement in the 1970s, alongside earlier organisations such as Potere Operaio (created after May 1968) and Lotta Continua, promoting a radical form of socialism based on working class self-activity rather than vanguard parties and state planning.[243][244]

Until its 1976 Geneva Congress, the Socialist International (SI) had few members outside Europe and no formal involvement with Latin America.[245] In the late 1970s and in the 1980s, the SI had extensive contacts and discussion with the two powers of the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union, about east–west relations and arms control, and admitted as member parties the Nicaraguan FSLN, the left-wing Puerto Rican Independence Party, as well as former Communist parties such as the Democratic Party of the Left of Italy and the Front for the Liberation of Mozambique (FRELIMO). The SI aided social democratic parties in re-establishing themselves when dictatorship gave way to democracy in Portugal (1974) and Spain (1975).

After Mao Zedong's death in 1976 and the arrest of the faction known as the Gang of Four, who were blamed for the excesses of the Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping took power and led the People's Republic of China to significant economic reforms. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) loosened governmental control over citizens' personal lives and the communes were disbanded in favour of private land leases, thus China's transition from a planned economy to a mixed economy named as "socialism with Chinese characteristics"[246] which maintained state ownership rights over land, state or cooperative ownership of much of the heavy industrial and manufacturing sectors and state influence in the banking and financial sectors. China adopted its current constitution on 4 December 1982. Chinese Communist Party General Secretary Jiang Zemin, Premiers Li Peng and Zhu Rongji led the nation in the 1990s. Under their administration, China sustained an average annual gross domestic product growth rate of 11.2%.[247][better source needed] At the Sixth National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam in December 1986, reformist politicians replaced the "old guard" government with new leadership.[248][249] The reformers were led by 71-year-old Nguyen Van Linh, who became the party's new general secretary.[248][249] Linh and the reformers implemented a series of free market reforms—known as Đổi Mới ("Renovation")—which carefully managed the transition from a planned economy to a "socialist-oriented market economy".[250][251]

Mikhail Gorbachev, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (1985–1991)

The Soviet Union experienced continued increases in mortality rate (particularly among men) as far back as 1965.[252][better source needed] Mikhail Gorbachev wished to move the Soviet Union towards of Nordic-style social democracy, calling it "a socialist beacon for all mankind".[253][254] Prior to its dissolution in 1991, the economy of the Soviet Union was by some measures the second largest in the world after the United States.[255][256][257] However, the economy was also beset by economic stagnation, an inflationary spiral, shortages of consumer goods, and fiscal mismanagement.[256] With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the economic integration of the Soviet republics was dissolved and overall industrial activity and economic productivity declined substantially.[258]

A lasting legacy of Communism in Soviet Union remains in the physical infrastructure created during decades of combined industrial production practices, and widespread environmental destruction.[259] The transition to capitalist market economies in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc was accompanied by Washington Consensus-inspired "shock therapy",[260] advocated by Western institutions and economists with the intent to replace state socialism with capitalism and integrate these countries into the capitalist western world.[261]

Following a transition to free-market capitalism, there was initially a steep fall in the standard of living. Post-Communist Russia experienced rising economic inequality and poverty[262][263] a surge in excess mortality amongst men,[261][252][264] and a decline in life expectancy,[265] which was accompanied by the entrenchment of a newly established business oligarchy.[262] By contrast, the Central European states of the former Eastern Bloc–Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia–showed healthy increases in life expectancy from the 1990s onward, compared to nearly thirty years of stagnation under socialism.[266][267][268][269] Bulgaria and Romania followed this trend after the introduction of more serious economic reforms in the late 1990s.[270][271] The right-libertarian think tank Cato Institute has stated that the analyses done of post-communist countries in the 1990s were "premature" and "that early and rapid reformers by far outperformed gradual reformers" on GDP per capita, the United Nations Human Development Index, political freedom, and developed better institutions. The institute also stated that the process of privatization in Russia was "deeply flawed" due to Russia's reforms being "far less rapid" than those of Central Europe and the Baltic states.[272]

The average post-Communist country had returned to 1989 levels of per-capita GDP by 2005,[273] and as of 2015, some countries were still behind that.[274] Several scholars state that the negative economic developments in post-Communist countries after the fall of Communism led to increased nationalist sentiment and nostalgia for the Communist era.[275][276][277] In 2011, The Guardian published an analysis of the former Soviet countries twenty years after the fall of the USSR. They found that "GDP fell as much as 50 percent in the 1990s in some republics... as capital flight, industrial collapse, hyperinflation and tax avoidance took their toll," but that there was a rebound in the 2000s, and by 2010 "some economies were five times as big as they were in 1991." Life expectancy has grown since 1991 in some of the countries, but fallen in others; likewise, some held free and fair elections, while others remained authoritarian.[278] By 2019, the majority of people in most Eastern European countries approved of the shift to multiparty democracy and a market economy, with approval being highest among residents of Poland and residents in the territory of what was once East Germany, and disapproval being the highest among residents of Russia and Ukraine . In addition, 61 per cent said that standards of living were now higher than they had been under Communism, while only 31 per cent said that they were worse, with the remaining 8 per cent saying that they did not know or that standards of living had not changed.[279]

Many social democratic parties, particularly after the Cold War, adopted neoliberal market policies including privatisation, deregulation and financialisation. They abandoned their pursuit of moderate socialism in favour of economic liberalism.[280] By the 1980s, with the rise of conservative neoliberal politicians such as Ronald Reagan in the United States, Margaret Thatcher in Britain, Brian Mulroney in Canada and Augusto Pinochet in Chile, the Western welfare state was dismantled from within, but state support for the corporate sector was maintained.[281] In the United Kingdom, Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock expelled some Trotskyist members and refused to support the 1984–1985 miners' strike over pit closures. In 1989, the 18th Congress of the SI adopted a new Declaration of Principles, stating: "Democratic socialism is an international movement for freedom, social justice, and solidarity. Its goal is to achieve a peaceful world where these basic values can be enhanced and where each individual can live a meaningful life with the full development of his or her personality and talents, and with the guarantee of human and civil rights in a democratic framework of society."[282]

In the 1990s, the British Labour Party under Tony Blair enacted policies based on the free-market economy to deliver public services via the private finance initiative. Influential in these policies was the idea of a Third Way between Old Left state socialism and New Right market capitalism, and a re-evaluation of welfare state policies.[283][284][285] In 1995, the Labour Party re-defined its stance on socialism by re-wording Clause IV of its constitution, defining socialism in ethical terms and removing all references to public, direct worker or municipal ownership of the means of production. The Labour Party stated: "The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that, by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create, for each of us, the means to realise our true potential, and, for all of us, a community in which power, wealth, and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few."[286] Left-wing critics of the Third Way argued that it reduced equality to an equal opportunity to compete in an economy in which the rich were growing richer and the poor were becoming more disadvantaged, which the leftists argue is not socialist.[41]

Starting in the late 20th century, the development of a post-industrial economy in which information and knowledge matter more than material production and labor raised doubts about the continued relevance of socialism, since socialism emerged in response to industrialization under capitalism.[41] Several scholars argued that socialism was dead in the immediate aftermath of the end of the Cold War. German sociologist and liberal politician Ralf Dahrendorf declared that "socialism is dead, and none of its variants can be revived for a world awakening from the double nightmare of Stalinism and Brezhnevism." Andre Gorz, a left-wing philosopher, also declared that "As a system, socialism is dead. As a movement and an organized political force, it is on its last legs. All the goals it once proclaimed are out of date."[287] American economist Robert Heilbroner wrote that "Less than seventy-five years after it officially began, the contest between capitalism and socialism is over: capitalism has won."[42] However there was also a counter-argument put forward by the socialist political scholars Antonio Negri and Felix Guattari, who argued that "whether perestroika succeeds in the present form or in a second wave that will inevitably follow, whether the Russian empire endures or not – these are all problems that concern only the Soviets," arguing that the role of socialism in global politics was not tied to the fate of the Soviet Union.[288]

### Early 21st century

Socialism across the world.
Top-left: a picture of the red flags found by the Monument to the People's Heroes, China.
Top-right: a demonstration in Austin, Texas, US by the Democratic Socialists of America.
Bottom-left: a demonstration by the Portuguese Socialist Youth.
Bottom-right: a rally for abortion rights in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia being led by members of the Victorian Socialists.

In 1990, the São Paulo Forum was launched by the Workers' Party (Brazil), linking left-wing socialist parties in Latin America. Its members were associated with the Pink tide of left-wing governments on the continent in the early 21st century. Member parties ruling countries included the Front for Victory in Argentina, the PAIS Alliance in Ecuador, Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front in El Salvador, Peru Wins in Peru, and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela, whose leader Hugo Chávez initiated what he called "Socialism of the 21st century".

Many mainstream democratic socialist and social democratic parties continued to drift right-wards. On the right of the socialist movement, the Progressive Alliance was founded in 2013 by current or former members of the Socialist International. The organisation states the aim of becoming the global network of "the progressive, democratic, social-democratic, socialist and labour movement".[289][290] Mainstream social democratic and socialist parties are also networked in Europe in the Party of European Socialists formed in 1992. Many of these parties lost large parts of their electoral base in the early 21st century. This phenomenon is known as Pasokification[291][292] from the Greek party PASOK, which saw a declining share of the vote in national elections—from 43.9% in 2009 to 13.2% in May 2012, to 12.3% in June 2012 and 4.7% in 2015—due to its poor handling of the Greek government-debt crisis and implementation of harsh austerity measures.[293][294]

In Europe, the share of votes for such socialist parties was at its 70-year lowest in 2015. For example, the Socialist Party, after winning the 2012 French presidential election, rapidly lost its vote share, the Social Democratic Party of Germany's fortunes declined rapidly from 2005 to 2019, and outside Europe the Israeli Labor Party fell from being the dominant force in Israeli politics to 4.43% of the vote in the April 2019 Israeli legislative election, and the Peruvian Aprista Party went from ruling party in 2011 to a minor party. The decline of these mainstream parties opened space for more radical and populist left parties in some countries, such as Spain's Podemos, Greece's Syriza (in government, 2015–19), Germany's Die Linke, and France's La France Insoumise. In other countries, left-wing revivals have taken place within mainstream democratic socialist and centrist parties, as with Jeremy Corbyn in the United Kingdom and Bernie Sanders in the United States.[42] Few of these radical left parties have won national government in Europe, while some more mainstream socialist parties have managed to, such as Portugal's Socialist Party.[295]

Bhaskar Sunkara, the founding editor of the American socialist magazine Jacobin, argued that the appeal of socialism persists due to the inequality and "tremendous suffering" under current global capitalism, the use of wage labor "which rests on the exploitation and domination of humans by other humans," and ecological crises, such as climate change.[287] In contrast, Mark J. Perry of the conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI) argued that despite socialism's resurgence, it is still "a flawed system based on completely faulty principles that aren't consistent with human behavior and can't nurture the human spirit.", adding that "While it promised prosperity, equality, and security, it delivered poverty, misery, and tyranny."[296] Some in the scientific community have suggested that a contemporary radical response to social and ecological problems could be seen in the emergence of movements associated with degrowth, eco-socialism and eco-anarchism.[297][298]

## Social and political theory

Main article: Social:Types of socialism

Early socialist thought took influences from a diverse range of philosophies such as civic republicanism, Enlightenment rationalism, romanticism, forms of materialism, Christianity (both Catholic and Protestant), natural law and natural rights theory, utilitarianism and liberal political economy.[299] Another philosophical basis for a great deal of early socialism was the emergence of positivism during the European Enlightenment. Positivism held that both the natural and social worlds could be understood through scientific knowledge and be analysed using scientific methods.

Claude Henri de Rouvroy, comte de Saint-Simon, early French socialist

The fundamental objective of socialism is to attain an advanced level of material production and therefore greater productivity, efficiency and rationality as compared to capitalism and all previous systems, under the view that an expansion of human productive capability is the basis for the extension of freedom and equality in society.[300] Many forms of socialist theory hold that human behaviour is largely shaped by the social environment. In particular, socialism holds that social mores, values, cultural traits and economic practices are social creations and not the result of an immutable natural law.[301][302] The object of their critique is thus not human avarice or human consciousness, but the material conditions and man-made social systems (i.e. the economic structure of society) which give rise to observed social problems and inefficiencies. Bertrand Russell, often considered to be the father of analytic philosophy, identified as a socialist. Russell opposed the class struggle aspects of Marxism, viewing socialism solely as an adjustment of economic relations to accommodate modern machine production to benefit all of humanity through the progressive reduction of necessary work time.[303]

Socialists view creativity as an essential aspect of human nature and define freedom as a state of being where individuals are able to express their creativity unhindered by constraints of both material scarcity and coercive social institutions.[304] The socialist concept of individuality is intertwined with the concept of individual creative expression. Karl Marx believed that expansion of the productive forces and technology was the basis for the expansion of human freedom and that socialism, being a system that is consistent with modern developments in technology, would enable the flourishing of "free individualities" through the progressive reduction of necessary labour time. The reduction of necessary labour time to a minimum would grant individuals the opportunity to pursue the development of their true individuality and creativity.[305]

### Criticism of capitalism

Main articles: Social:Anti-capitalism and Philosophy:Criticism of capitalism

Socialists argue that the accumulation of capital generates waste through externalities that require costly corrective regulatory measures. They also point out that this process generates wasteful industries and practices that exist only to generate sufficient demand for products such as high-pressure advertisement to be sold at a profit, thereby creating rather than satisfying economic demand.[306][307] Socialists argue that capitalism consists of irrational activity, such as the purchasing of commodities only to sell at a later time when their price appreciates, rather than for consumption, even if the commodity cannot be sold at a profit to individuals in need and therefore a crucial criticism often made by socialists is that "making money", or accumulation of capital, does not correspond to the satisfaction of demand (the production of use-values).[306] The fundamental criterion for economic activity in capitalism is the accumulation of capital for reinvestment in production, but this spurs the development of new, non-productive industries that do not produce use-value and only exist to keep the accumulation process afloat (otherwise the system goes into crisis), such as the spread of the financial industry, contributing to the formation of economic bubbles.[308] Such accumulation and reinvestment, when it demands a constant rate of profit, causes problems if the earnings in the rest of society do not increase in proportion.[309]

Socialists view private property relations as limiting the potential of productive forces in the economy. According to socialists, private property becomes obsolete when it concentrates into centralised, socialised institutions based on private appropriation of revenue—but based on cooperative work and internal planning in allocation of inputs—until the role of the capitalist becomes redundant.[310] With no need for capital accumulation and a class of owners, private property in the means of production is perceived as being an outdated form of economic organisation that should be replaced by a free association of individuals based on public or common ownership of these socialised assets.[311][312] Private ownership imposes constraints on planning, leading to uncoordinated economic decisions that result in business fluctuations, unemployment and a tremendous waste of material resources during crisis of overproduction.[313]

Excessive disparities in income distribution lead to social instability and require costly corrective measures in the form of redistributive taxation, which incurs heavy administrative costs while weakening the incentive to work, inviting dishonesty and increasing the likelihood of tax evasion while (the corrective measures) reduce the overall efficiency of the market economy.[314] These corrective policies limit the incentive system of the market by providing things such as minimum wages, unemployment insurance, taxing profits and reducing the reserve army of labour, resulting in reduced incentives for capitalists to invest in more production. In essence, social welfare policies cripple capitalism and its incentive system and are thus unsustainable in the long run.[315] Marxists argue that the establishment of a socialist mode of production is the only way to overcome these deficiencies. Socialists and specifically Marxian socialists argue that the inherent conflict of interests between the working class and capital prevent optimal use of available human resources and leads to contradictory interest groups (labour and business) striving to influence the state to intervene in the economy in their favour at the expense of overall economic efficiency. Early socialists (utopian socialists and Ricardian socialists) criticised capitalism for concentrating power and wealth within a small segment of society.[316] In addition, they complained that capitalism does not use available technology and resources to their maximum potential in the interests of the public.[312]

### Marxism

Main article: Philosophy:Marxism

At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or—this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms—with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure.[317]

—Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels argued that socialism would emerge from historical necessity as capitalism rendered itself obsolete and unsustainable from increasing internal contradictions emerging from the development of the productive forces and technology. It was these advances in the productive forces combined with the old social relations of production of capitalism that would generate contradictions, leading to working-class consciousness.[318]

The writings of Karl Marx provided the basis for the development of Marxist political theory and Marxian economics.

Marx and Engels held the view that the consciousness of those who earn a wage or salary (the working class in the broadest Marxist sense) would be moulded by their conditions of wage slavery, leading to a tendency to seek their freedom or emancipation by overthrowing ownership of the means of production by capitalists and consequently, overthrowing the state that upheld this economic order. For Marx and Engels, conditions determine consciousness and ending the role of the capitalist class leads eventually to a classless society in which the state would wither away.

Marx and Engels used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably, but many later Marxists defined socialism as a specific historical phase that would displace capitalism and precede communism.[53][56]

The major characteristics of socialism (particularly as conceived by Marx and Engels after the Paris Commune of 1871) are that the proletariat would control the means of production through a workers' state erected by the workers in their interests.

For orthodox Marxists, socialism is the lower stage of communism based on the principle of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution" while upper stage communism is based on the principle of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need", the upper stage becoming possible only after the socialist stage further develops economic efficiency and the automation of production has led to a superabundance of goods and services.[319][320] Marx argued that the material productive forces (in industry and commerce) brought into existence by capitalism predicated a cooperative society since production had become a mass social, collective activity of the working class to create commodities but with private ownership (the relations of production or property relations). This conflict between collective effort in large factories and private ownership would bring about a conscious desire in the working class to establish collective ownership commensurate with the collective efforts their daily experience.[317]

### Role of the state

Socialists have taken different perspectives on the state and the role it should play in revolutionary struggles, in constructing socialism and within an established socialist economy.

In the 19th century, the philosophy of state socialism was first explicitly expounded by the German political philosopher Ferdinand Lassalle. In contrast to Karl Marx's perspective of the state, Lassalle rejected the concept of the state as a class-based power structure whose main function was to preserve existing class structures. Lassalle also rejected the Marxist view that the state was destined to "wither away". Lassalle considered the state to be an entity independent of class allegiances and an instrument of justice that would therefore be essential for achieving socialism.[321]

Preceding the Bolshevik-led revolution in Russia, many socialists including reformists, orthodox Marxist currents such as council communism, anarchists and libertarian socialists criticised the idea of using the state to conduct central planning and own the means of production as a way to establish socialism. Following the victory of Leninism in Russia, the idea of "state socialism" spread rapidly throughout the socialist movement and eventually state socialism came to be identified with the Soviet economic model.[322]

Joseph Schumpeter rejected the association of socialism and social ownership with state ownership over the means of production because the state as it exists in its current form is a product of capitalist society and cannot be transplanted to a different institutional framework. Schumpeter argued that there would be different institutions within socialism than those that exist within modern capitalism, just as feudalism had its own distinct and unique institutional forms. The state, along with concepts like property and taxation, were concepts exclusive to commercial society (capitalism) and attempting to place them within the context of a future socialist society would amount to a distortion of these concepts by using them out of context.[323]

### Utopian versus scientific

Main articles: Social:Scientific socialism and Philosophy:Utopian socialism

Utopian socialism is a term used to define the first currents of modern socialist thought as exemplified by the work of Henri de Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier and Robert Owen which inspired Karl Marx and other early socialists.[324] Visions of imaginary ideal societies, which competed with revolutionary social democratic movements, were viewed as not being grounded in the material conditions of society and as reactionary.[325] Although it is technically possible for any set of ideas or any person living at any time in history to be a utopian socialist, the term is most often applied to those socialists who lived in the first quarter of the 19th century who were ascribed the label "utopian" by later socialists as a negative term to imply naivete and dismiss their ideas as fanciful or unrealistic.[87]

Religious sects whose members live communally such as the Hutterites are not usually called "utopian socialists", although their way of living is a prime example. They have been categorised as religious socialists by some. Similarly, modern intentional communities based on socialist ideas could also be categorised as "utopian socialist". For Marxists, the development of capitalism in Western Europe provided a material basis for the possibility of bringing about socialism because according to The Communist Manifesto "[w]hat the bourgeoisie produces above all is its own grave diggers",[326] namely the working class, which must become conscious of the historical objectives set it by society.

### Reform versus revolution

Main articles: Social:Reformism and Social:Revolutionary socialism

Revolutionary socialists believe that a social revolution is necessary to effect structural changes to the socioeconomic structure of society. Among revolutionary socialists there are differences in strategy, theory and the definition of revolution. Orthodox Marxists and left communists take an impossibilist stance, believing that revolution should be spontaneous as a result of contradictions in society due to technological changes in the productive forces. Lenin theorised that under capitalism the workers cannot achieve class consciousness beyond organising into trade unions and making demands of the capitalists. Therefore, Leninists argue that it is historically necessary for a vanguard of class conscious revolutionaries to take a central role in coordinating the social revolution to overthrow the capitalist state and eventually the institution of the state altogether.[327] Revolution is not necessarily defined by revolutionary socialists as violent insurrection,[328] but as a complete dismantling and rapid transformation of all areas of class society led by the majority of the masses: the working class.

Reformism is generally associated with social democracy and gradualist democratic socialism. Reformism is the belief that socialists should stand in parliamentary elections within capitalist society and if elected use the machinery of government to pass political and social reforms for the purposes of ameliorating the instabilities and inequities of capitalism. Within socialism, reformism is used in two different ways. One has no intention of bringing about socialism or fundamental economic change to society and is used to oppose such structural changes. The other is based on the assumption that while reforms are not socialist in themselves, they can help rally supporters to the cause of revolution by popularizing the cause of socialism to the working class.[329]

The debate on the ability for social democratic reformism to lead to a socialist transformation of society is over a century old. Reformism is criticized for being paradoxical as it seeks to overcome the existing economic system of capitalism while trying to improve the conditions of capitalism, thereby making it appear more tolerable to society. According to Rosa Luxemburg, capitalism is not overthrown, "but is on the contrary strengthened by the development of social reforms".[330] In a similar vein, Stan Parker of the Socialist Party of Great Britain argues that reforms are a diversion of energy for socialists and are limited because they must adhere to the logic of capitalism.[329] French social theorist Andre Gorz criticized reformism by advocating a third alternative to reformism and social revolution that he called "non-reformist reforms", specifically focused on structural changes to capitalism as opposed to reforms to improve living conditions within capitalism or to prop it up through economic interventions.[331]

## Economics

Main article: Social:Socialist economics

Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter)

—Albert Einstein, "Why Socialism?", 1949

Albert Einstein advocated for a socialist planned economy with his 1949 article "Why Socialism?"

Socialist economics starts from the premise that "individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one another. Furthermore, everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and everyone who contributes to the production of a good is entitled to a share in it. Society as whole, therefore, should own or at least control property for the benefit of all its members".[96]

The original conception of socialism was an economic system whereby production was organised in a way to directly produce goods and services for their utility (or use-value in classical and Marxian economics), with the direct allocation of resources in terms of physical units as opposed to financial calculation and the economic laws of capitalism (see law of value), often entailing the end of capitalistic economic categories such as rent, interest, profit and money.[332] In a fully developed socialist economy, production and balancing factor inputs with outputs becomes a technical process to be undertaken by engineers.[333]

Market socialism refers to an array of different economic theories and systems that use the market mechanism to organise production and to allocate factor inputs among socially owned enterprises, with the economic surplus (profits) accruing to society in a social dividend as opposed to private capital owners.[334] Variations of market socialism include libertarian proposals such as mutualism, based on classical economics, and neoclassical economic models such as the Lange Model. Some economists, such as Joseph Stiglitz, Mancur Olson, and others not specifically advancing anti-socialists positions have shown that prevailing economic models upon which such democratic or market socialism models might be based have logical flaws or unworkable presuppositions.[335][336] These criticisms have been incorporated into the models of market socialism developed by John Roemer and Nicholas Vrousalis.[337][338][when?]

The ownership of the means of production can be based on direct ownership by the users of the productive property through worker cooperative; or commonly owned by all of society with management and control delegated to those who operate/use the means of production; or public ownership by a state apparatus. Public ownership may refer to the creation of state-owned enterprises, nationalisation, municipalisation or autonomous collective institutions. Some socialists feel that in a socialist economy, at least the "commanding heights" of the economy must be publicly owned.[339] Economic liberals and right libertarians view private ownership of the means of production and the market exchange as natural entities or moral rights which are central to their conceptions of freedom and liberty and view the economic dynamics of capitalism as immutable and absolute, therefore they perceive public ownership of the means of production, cooperatives and economic planning as infringements upon liberty.[340][341]

Management and control over the activities of enterprises are based on self-management and self-governance, with equal power-relations in the workplace to maximise occupational autonomy. A socialist form of organisation would eliminate controlling hierarchies so that only a hierarchy based on technical knowledge in the workplace remains. Every member would have decision-making power in the firm and would be able to participate in establishing its overall policy objectives. The policies/goals would be carried out by the technical specialists that form the coordinating hierarchy of the firm, who would establish plans or directives for the work community to accomplish these goals:[342][343]

The role and use of money in a hypothetical socialist economy is a contested issue. Nineteenth century socialists including Karl Marx, Robert Owen, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and John Stuart Mill advocated various forms of labour vouchers or labour credits, which like money would be used to acquire articles of consumption, but unlike money they are unable to become capital and would not be used to allocate resources within the production process. Bolshevik revolutionary Leon Trotsky argued that money could not be arbitrarily abolished following a socialist revolution. Money had to exhaust its "historic mission", meaning it would have to be used until its function became redundant, eventually being transformed into bookkeeping receipts for statisticians and only in the more distant future would money not be required for even that role.[344]

### Planned economy

Main article: Social:Planned economy

A planned economy is a type of economy consisting of a mixture of public ownership of the means of production and the coordination of production and distribution through economic planning. A planned economy can be either decentralised or centralised. Enrico Barone provided a comprehensive theoretical framework for a planned socialist economy. In his model, assuming perfect computation techniques, simultaneous equations relating inputs and outputs to ratios of equivalence would provide appropriate valuations to balance supply and demand.[345]

The most prominent example of a planned economy was the economic system of the Soviet Union and as such the centralised-planned economic model is usually associated with the communist states of the 20th century, where it was combined with a single-party political system. In a centrally planned economy, decisions regarding the quantity of goods and services to be produced are planned in advance by a planning agency (see also the analysis of Soviet-type economic planning). The economic systems of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc are further classified as "command economies", which are defined as systems where economic coordination is undertaken by commands, directives and production targets.[346] Studies by economists of various political persuasions on the actual functioning of the Soviet economy indicate that it was not actually a planned economy. Instead of conscious planning, the Soviet economy was based on a process whereby the plan was modified by localised agents and the original plans went largely unfulfilled. Planning agencies, ministries and enterprises all adapted and bargained with each other during the formulation of the plan as opposed to following a plan passed down from a higher authority, leading some economists to suggest that planning did not actually take place within the Soviet economy and that a better description would be an "administered" or "managed" economy.[347]

Although central planning was largely supported by Marxist–Leninists, some factions within the Soviet Union before the rise of Stalinism held positions contrary to central planning. Leon Trotsky rejected central planning in favour of decentralised planning. He argued that central planners, regardless of their intellectual capacity, would be unable to coordinate effectively all economic activity within an economy because they operated without the input and tacit knowledge embodied by the participation of the millions of people in the economy. As a result, central planners would be unable to respond to local economic conditions.[348] State socialism is unfeasible in this view because information cannot be aggregated by a central body and effectively used to formulate a plan for an entire economy, because doing so would result in distorted or absent price signals.[349]

### Self-managed economy

Socialism, you see, is a bird with two wings. The definition is 'social ownership and democratic control of the instruments and means of production.'[350]

—Upton Sinclair

A self-managed, decentralised economy is based on autonomous self-regulating economic units and a decentralised mechanism of resource allocation and decision-making. This model has found support in notable classical and neoclassical economists including Alfred Marshall, John Stuart Mill and Jaroslav Vanek. There are numerous variations of self-management, including labour-managed firms and worker-managed firms. The goals of self-management are to eliminate exploitation and reduce alienation.[351] Guild socialism is a political movement advocating workers' control of industry through the medium of trade-related guilds "in an implied contractual relationship with the public".[352] It originated in the United Kingdom and was at its most influential in the first quarter of the 20th century.[352] It was strongly associated with G. D. H. Cole and influenced by the ideas of William Morris.

Project Cybersyn was an early form of computational economic planning.

One such system is the cooperative economy, a largely free market economy in which workers manage the firms and democratically determine remuneration levels and labour divisions. Productive resources would be legally owned by the cooperative and rented to the workers, who would enjoy usufruct rights.[353] Another form of decentralised planning is the use of cybernetics, or the use of computers to manage the allocation of economic inputs. The socialist-run government of Salvador Allende in Chile experimented with Project Cybersyn, a real-time information bridge between the government, state enterprises and consumers.[354] Another, more recent variant is participatory economics, wherein the economy is planned by decentralised councils of workers and consumers. Workers would be remunerated solely according to effort and sacrifice, so that those engaged in dangerous, uncomfortable and strenuous work would receive the highest incomes and could thereby work less.[355] A contemporary model for a self-managed, non-market socialism is Pat Devine's model of negotiated coordination. Negotiated coordination is based upon social ownership by those affected by the use of the assets involved, with decisions made by those at the most localised level of production.[356]

Michel Bauwens identifies the emergence of the open software movement and peer-to-peer production as a new alternative mode of production to the capitalist economy and centrally planned economy that is based on collaborative self-management, common ownership of resources and the production of use-values through the free cooperation of producers who have access to distributed capital.[357]

Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism which advocates the abolition of the state, private property and capitalism in favour of common ownership of the means of production.[358][359] Anarcho-syndicalism was practised in Catalonia and other places in the Spanish Revolution during the Spanish Civil War. Sam Dolgoff estimated that about eight million people participated directly or at least indirectly in the Spanish Revolution.[360]

The economy of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia established a system based on market-based allocation, social ownership of the means of production and self-management within firms. This system substituted Yugoslavia's Soviet-type central planning with a decentralised, self-managed system after reforms in 1953.[361]

The Marxian economist Richard D. Wolff argues that "re-organising production so that workers become collectively self-directed at their work-sites" not only moves society beyond both capitalism and state socialism of the last century, but would also mark another milestone in human history, similar to earlier transitions out of slavery and feudalism.[362] As an example, Wolff claims that Mondragon is "a stunningly successful alternative to the capitalist organisation of production".[363]

### State-directed economy

Main article: Philosophy:State socialism

State socialism can be used to classify any variety of socialist philosophies that advocates the ownership of the means of production by the state apparatus, either as a transitional stage between capitalism and socialism, or as an end-goal in itself. Typically, it refers to a form of technocratic management, whereby technical specialists administer or manage economic enterprises on behalf of society and the public interest instead of workers' councils or workplace democracy.

A state-directed economy may refer to a type of mixed economy consisting of public ownership over large industries, as promoted by various Social democratic political parties during the 20th century. This ideology influenced the policies of the British Labour Party during Clement Attlee's administration. In the biography of the 1945 United Kingdom Labour Party Prime Minister Clement Attlee, Francis Beckett states: "[T]he government ... wanted what would become known as a mixed economy."[364]

Nationalisation in the United Kingdom was achieved through compulsory purchase of the industry (i.e. with compensation). British Aerospace was a combination of major aircraft companies British Aircraft Corporation, Hawker Siddeley and others. British Shipbuilders was a combination of the major shipbuilding companies including Cammell Laird, Govan Shipbuilders, Swan Hunter and Yarrow Shipbuilders, whereas the nationalisation of the coal mines in 1947 created a coal board charged with running the coal industry commercially so as to be able to meet the interest payable on the bonds which the former mine owners' shares had been converted into.[365][366]

### Market socialism

Main article: Social:Market socialism

Market socialism consists of publicly owned or cooperatively owned enterprises operating in a market economy. It is a system that uses the market and monetary prices for the allocation and accounting of the means of production, thereby retaining the process of capital accumulation. The profit generated would be used to directly remunerate employees, collectively sustain the enterprise or finance public institutions.[367] In state-oriented forms of market socialism, in which state enterprises attempt to maximise profit, the profits can be used to fund government programs and services through a social dividend, eliminating or greatly diminishing the need for various forms of taxation that exist in capitalist systems. Neoclassical economist Léon Walras believed that a socialist economy based on state ownership of land and natural resources would provide a means of public finance to make income taxes unnecessary.[368] Yugoslavia implemented a market socialist economy based on cooperatives and worker self-management.[369] Some of the economic reforms introduced during the Prague Spring by Alexander Dubček, the leader of Czechoslovakia, included elements of market socialism.[370]

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, main theorist of mutualism and influential French socialist thinker

Mutualism is an economic theory and anarchist school of thought that advocates a society where each person might possess a means of production, either individually or collectively, with trade representing equivalent amounts of labour in the free market.[371] Integral to the scheme was the establishment of a mutual-credit bank that would lend to producers at a minimal interest rate, just high enough to cover administration.[372] Mutualism is based on a labour theory of value that holds that when labour or its product is sold, in exchange it ought to receive goods or services embodying "the amount of labour necessary to produce an article of exactly similar and equal utility".[373]

The current economic system in China is formally referred to as a socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics. It combines a large state sector that comprises the commanding heights of the economy, which are guaranteed their public ownership status by law,[374] with a private sector mainly engaged in commodity production and light industry responsible from anywhere between 33%[375] to over 70% of GDP generated in 2005.[376] Although there has been a rapid expansion of private-sector activity since the 1980s, privatisation of state assets was virtually halted and were partially reversed in 2005.[377] The current Chinese economy consists of 150 corporatised state-owned enterprises that report directly to China's central government.[378] By 2008, these state-owned corporations had become increasingly dynamic and generated large increases in revenue for the state,[379][380] resulting in a state-sector led recovery during the 2009 financial crises while accounting for most of China's economic growth.[381] The Chinese economic model is widely cited as a contemporary form of state capitalism, the major difference between Western capitalism and the Chinese model being the degree of state-ownership of shares in publicly listed corporations. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam has adopted a similar model after the Doi Moi economic renovation but slightly differs from the Chinese model in that the Vietnamese government retains firm control over the state sector and strategic industries, but allows for private-sector activity in commodity production.[382]

## Politics

Socialists in Union Square, New York City on May Day 1912

While major socialist political movements include anarchism, communism, the labour movement, Marxism, social democracy, and syndicalism, independent socialist theorists, utopian socialist authors, and academic supporters of socialism may not be represented in these movements. Some political groups have called themselves socialist while holding views that some consider antithetical to socialism. Socialist has been used by members of the political right as an epithet, including against individuals who do not consider themselves to be socialists and against policies that are not considered socialist by their proponents. While there are many variations of socialism, and there is no single definition encapsulating all of socialism, there have been common elements identified by scholars.[383]

In his Dictionary of Socialism (1924), Angelo S. Rappoport analysed forty definitions of socialism to conclude that common elements of socialism include general criticism of the social effects of private ownership and control of capital—as being the cause of poverty, low wages, unemployment, economic and social inequality and a lack of economic security; a general view that the solution to these problems is a form of collective control over the means of production, distribution and exchange (the degree and means of control vary among socialist movements); an agreement that the outcome of this collective control should be a society based upon social justice, including social equality, economic protection of people and should provide a more satisfying life for most people.[384]

In The Concepts of Socialism (1975), Bhikhu Parekh identifies four core principles of socialism and particularly socialist society, namely sociality, social responsibility, cooperation and planning.[385] In his study Ideologies and Political Theory (1996), Michael Freeden states that all socialists share five themes: the first is that socialism posits that society is more than a mere collection of individuals; second, that it considers human welfare a desirable objective; third, that it considers humans by nature to be active and productive; fourth, it holds the belief of human equality; and fifth, that history is progressive and will create positive change on the condition that humans work to achieve such change.[385]

### Anarchism

Main article: Social:Anarchism

Anarchism advocates stateless societies often defined as self-governed voluntary institutions,[386][387][388][389] but that several authors have defined as more specific institutions based on non-hierarchical free associations.[390][391][392][393] While anarchism holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary or harmful,[394][395] it is not the central aspect.[396] Anarchism entails opposing authority or hierarchical organisation in the conduct of human relations, including the state system.[390][397][398][399][400] Mutualists support market socialism, collectivist anarchists favour workers cooperatives and salaries based on the amount of time contributed to production, anarcho-communists advocate a direct transition from capitalism to libertarian communism and a gift economy and anarcho-syndicalists prefer workers' direct action and the general strike.[401]

The authoritarian–libertarian struggles and disputes within the socialist movement go back to the First International and the expulsion in 1872 of the anarchists, who went on to lead the Anti-authoritarian International and then founded their own libertarian international, the Anarchist St. Imier International.[402] In 1888, the individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker, who proclaimed himself to be an anarchistic socialist and libertarian socialist in opposition to the authoritarian state socialism and the compulsory communism, included the full text of a "Socialistic Letter" by Ernest Lesigne[403] in his essay on "State Socialism and Anarchism". According to Lesigne, there are two types of socialism: "One is dictatorial, the other libertarian".[404] Tucker's two socialisms were the authoritarian state socialism which he associated to the Marxist school and the libertarian anarchist socialism, or simply anarchism, that he advocated. Tucker noted that the fact that the authoritarian "State Socialism has overshadowed other forms of Socialism gives it no right to a monopoly of the Socialistic idea".[405] According to Tucker, what those two schools of socialism had in common was the labor theory of value and the ends, by which anarchism pursued different means.[406]

According to anarchists such as the authors of An Anarchist FAQ, anarchism is one of the many traditions of socialism. For anarchists and other anti-authoritarian socialists, socialism "can only mean a classless and anti-authoritarian (i.e. libertarian) society in which people manage their own affairs, either as individuals or as part of a group (depending on the situation). In other words, it implies self-management in all aspects of life", including at the workplace.[401] Michael Newman includes anarchism as one of many socialist traditions.[87] Peter Marshall argues that "[i]n general anarchism is closer to socialism than liberalism. ... Anarchism finds itself largely in the socialist camp, but it also has outriders in liberalism. It cannot be reduced to socialism, and is best seen as a separate and distinctive doctrine."[407]

### Democratic socialism and social democracy

Main articles: Social:Democratic socialism and Philosophy:Social democracy

You can't talk about ending the slums without first saying profit must be taken out of slums. You're really tampering and getting on dangerous ground because you are messing with folk then. You are messing with captains of industry. Now this means that we are treading in difficult water, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong with capitalism. There must be a better distribution of wealth, and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism.[408][409]

—Martin Luther King Jr., 1966

Democratic socialism represents any socialist movement that seeks to establish an economy based on economic democracy by and for the working class. Democratic socialism is difficult to define and groups of scholars have radically different definitions for the term. Some definitions simply refer to all forms of socialism that follow an electoral, reformist or evolutionary path to socialism rather than a revolutionary one.[410] According to Christopher Pierson, "[i]f the contrast which 1989 highlights is not that between socialism in the East and liberal democracy in the West, the latter must be recognised to have been shaped, reformed and compromised by a century of social democratic pressure". Pierson further claims that "social democratic and socialist parties within the constitutional arena in the West have almost always been involved in a politics of compromise with existing capitalist institutions (to whatever far distant prize its eyes might from time to time have been lifted)". For Pierson, "if advocates of the death of socialism accept that social democrats belong within the socialist camp, as I think they must, then the contrast between socialism (in all its variants) and liberal democracy must collapse. For actually existing liberal democracy is, in substantial part, a product of socialist (social democratic) forces".[411]

Social democracy is a socialist tradition of political thought.[412][413] Many social democrats refer to themselves as socialists or democratic socialists and some such as Tony Blair employ these terms interchangeably.[414][415][416] Others found "clear differences" between the three terms and prefer to describe their own political beliefs by using the term social democracy.[417] The two main directions were to establish democratic socialism or to build first a welfare state within the capitalist system. The first variant advances democratic socialism through reformist and gradualist methods.[418] In the second variant, social democracy is a policy regime involving a welfare state, collective bargaining schemes, support for publicly financed public services and a mixed economy. It is often used in this manner to refer to Western and Northern Europe during the later half of the 20th century.[419][420] It was described by Jerry Mander as "hybrid economics", an active collaboration of capitalist and socialist visions.[421] Some studies and surveys indicate that people tend to live happier and healthier lives in social democratic societies rather than neoliberal ones.[422][423][424][425]

Eduard Bernstein

Social democrats advocate a peaceful, evolutionary transition of the economy to socialism through progressive social reform.[426][427] It asserts that the only acceptable constitutional form of government is representative democracy under the rule of law.[428] It promotes extending democratic decision-making beyond political democracy to include economic democracy to guarantee employees and other economic stakeholders sufficient rights of co-determination.[428] It supports a mixed economy that opposes inequality, poverty and oppression while rejecting both a totally unregulated market economy or a fully planned economy.[429] Common social democratic policies include universal social rights and universally accessible public services such as education, health care, workers' compensation and other services, including child care and elder care.[430] Social democracy supports the trade union labour movement and supports collective bargaining rights for workers.[431] Most social democratic parties are affiliated with the Socialist International.[418]

Modern democratic socialism is a broad political movement that seeks to promote the ideals of socialism within the context of a democratic system. Some democratic socialists support social democracy as a temporary measure to reform the current system while others reject reformism in favour of more revolutionary methods. Modern social democracy emphasises a program of gradual legislative modification of capitalism to make it more equitable and humane while the theoretical end goal of building a socialist society is relegated to the indefinite future. According to Sheri Berman, Marxism is loosely held to be valuable for its emphasis on changing the world for a more just, better future.[432]

The two movements are widely similar both in terminology and in ideology, although there are a few key differences. The major difference between social democracy and democratic socialism is the object of their politics in that contemporary social democrats support a welfare state and unemployment insurance as well as other practical, progressive reforms of capitalism and are more concerned to administrate and humanise it. On the other hand, democratic socialists seek to replace capitalism with a socialist economic system, arguing that any attempt to humanise capitalism through regulations and welfare policies would distort the market and create economic contradictions.[433]

### Ethical and liberal socialism

Main articles: Philosophy:Ethical socialism and Philosophy:Liberal socialism

R. H. Tawney, founder of ethical socialism

Ethical socialism appeals to socialism on ethical and moral grounds as opposed to economic, egoistic, and consumeristic grounds. It emphasizes the need for a morally conscious economy based upon the principles of altruism, cooperation, and social justice while opposing possessive individualism.[434] Ethical socialism has been the official philosophy of mainstream socialist parties.[435]

Liberal socialism incorporates liberal principles to socialism.[436] It has been compared to post-war social democracy[437] for its support of a mixed economy that includes both public and private capital goods.[438][439] While democratic socialism and social democracy are anti-capitalist positions insofar as criticism of capitalism is linked to the private ownership of the means of production,[384] liberal socialism identifies artificial and legalistic monopolies to be the fault of capitalism[440] and opposes an entirely unregulated market economy.[441] It considers both liberty and social equality to be compatible and mutually dependent.[436]

Principles that can be described as ethical or liberal socialist have been based upon or developed by philosophers such as John Stuart Mill, Eduard Bernstein, John Dewey, Carlo Rosselli, Norberto Bobbio, and Chantal Mouffe.[442] Other important liberal socialist figures include Guido Calogero, Piero Gobetti, Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, John Maynard Keynes and R. H. Tawney.[441] Liberal socialism has been particularly prominent in British and Italian politics.[441]

### Leninism and precedents

Main articles: Social:Authoritarian socialism, Social:Blanquism, Social:Leninism, Social:Trotskyism, and Marxism–Social:Leninism

Russian revolutionary, politician, and political theorist Vladimir Lenin in 1920

Blanquism is a conception of revolution named for Louis Auguste Blanqui. It holds that socialist revolution should be carried out by a relatively small group of highly organised and secretive conspirators.[443] Upon seizing power, the revolutionaries introduce socialism.[444] Rosa Luxemburg and Eduard Bernstein[445] criticised Lenin, stating that his conception of revolution was elitist and Blanquist.[446] Marxism–Leninism combines Marx's scientific socialist concepts and Lenin's anti-imperialism, democratic centralism and vanguardism.[447]

Hal Draper defined socialism from above as the philosophy which employs an elite administration to run the socialist state. The other side of socialism is a more democratic socialism from below.[448] The idea of socialism from above is much more frequently discussed in elite circles than socialism from below—even if that is the Marxist ideal—because it is more practical.[449] Draper viewed socialism from below as being the purer, more Marxist version of socialism.[450] According to Draper, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were devoutly opposed to any socialist institution that was "conducive to superstitious authoritarianism". Draper makes the argument that this division echoes the division between "reformist or revolutionary, peaceful or violent, democratic or authoritarian, etc." and further identifies six major varieties of socialism from above, among them "Philanthropism", "Elitism", "Pannism", "Communism", "Permeationism" and "Socialism-from-Outside".[451]

According to Arthur Lipow, Marx and Engels were "the founders of modern revolutionary democratic socialism", described as a form of "socialism from below" that is "based on a mass working-class movement, fighting from below for the extension of democracy and human freedom". This type of socialism is contrasted to that of the "authoritarian, anti-democratic creed" and "the various totalitarian collectivist ideologies which claim the title of socialism" as well as "the many varieties of 'socialism from above' which have led in the twentieth century to movements and state forms in which a despotic 'new class' rules over a statified economy in the name of socialism", a division that "runs through the history of the socialist movement". Lipow identifies Bellamyism and Stalinism as two prominent authoritarian socialist currents within the history of the socialist movement.[452]

### Libertarian socialism

Main article: Philosophy:Libertarian socialism

The first anarchist journal to use the term libertarian was Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement Social, published in New York City between 1858 and 1861 by French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque,[453] the first recorded person to describe himself as libertarian.[454]

Libertarian socialism, sometimes called left-libertarianism,[455][456] social anarchism[457][458] and socialist libertarianism,[459] is an anti-authoritarian, anti-statist and libertarian[460] tradition within socialism that rejects centralised state ownership and control[461] including criticism of wage labour relationships (wage slavery)[462] as well as the state itself.[463] It emphasises workers' self-management and decentralised structures of political organisation.[463][464] Libertarian socialism asserts that a society based on freedom and equality can be achieved through abolishing authoritarian institutions that control production.[465] Libertarian socialists generally prefer direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as libertarian municipalism, citizens' assemblies, trade unions and workers' councils.[466][467]

Anarcho-syndicalist Gaston Leval explained:

> We therefore foresee a Society in which all activities will be coordinated, a structure that has, at the same time, sufficient flexibility to permit the greatest possible autonomy for social life, or for the life of each enterprise, and enough cohesiveness to prevent all disorder. ... In a well-organised society, all of these things must be systematically accomplished by means of parallel federations, vertically united at the highest levels, constituting one vast organism in which all economic functions will be performed in solidarity with all others and that will permanently preserve the necessary cohesion".[468]

All of this is typically done within a general call for libertarian[469] and voluntary free associations[470] through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.[471][472][398]

As part of the larger socialist movement, it seeks to distinguish itself from Bolshevism, Leninism and Marxism–Leninism as well as social democracy.[473] Past and present political philosophies and movements commonly described as libertarian socialist include anarchism (anarcho-communism, anarcho-syndicalism,[citation needed] collectivist anarchism, individualist anarchism[474][475][476] and mutualism),[477] autonomism, Communalism, participism, libertarian Marxism (council communism and Luxemburgism),[478][479] revolutionary syndicalism and utopian socialism (Fourierism).[480]

### Religious socialism

Main article: Social:Religious socialism

Christian socialism is a broad concept involving an intertwining of Christian religion with socialism.[481]

Arabic letters "Lam" and "Alif" reading "Lā" (Arabic for "No!") are a symbol of Islamic Socialism in Turkey.

Islamic socialism is a more spiritual form of socialism. Muslim socialists believe that the teachings of the Quran and Muhammad are not only compatible with, but actively promoting the principles of equality and public ownership, drawing inspiration from the early Medina welfare state he established. Muslim socialists are more conservative than their Western contemporaries and find their roots in anti-imperialism, anti-colonialism[482][483] and sometimes, if in an Arab speaking country, Arab nationalism. Islamic socialists believe in deriving legitimacy from political mandate as opposed to religious texts.

### Social movements

Main articles: Social:Eco-socialism, Social:Socialism and LGBT rights, and Social:Socialist feminism

Socialist feminist Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg in 1910

Socialist feminism is a branch of feminism that argues that liberation can only be achieved by working to end both economic and cultural sources of women's oppression.[484] Marxist feminism's foundation was laid by Engels in The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884). August Bebel's Woman under Socialism (1879), is the "single work dealing with sexuality most widely read by rank-and-file members of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD)".[485] In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, both Clara Zetkin and Eleanor Marx were against the demonisation of men and supported a proletariat revolution that would overcome as many male-female inequalities as possible.[486] As their movement already had the most radical demands in women's equality, most Marxist leaders, including Clara Zetkin[487][488] and Alexandra Kollontai,[489][490] counterposed Marxism against liberal feminism rather than trying to combine them. Anarcha-feminism began with late 19th- and early 20th-century authors and theorists such as anarchist feminists Goldman and Voltairine de Cleyre[491] In the Spanish Civil War, an anarcha-feminist group, Mujeres Libres ("Free Women") linked to the Federación Anarquista Ibérica, organised to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas.[492] In 1972, the Chicago Women's Liberation Union published "Socialist Feminism: A Strategy for the Women's Movement", which is believed to be the first published use of the term "socialist feminism".[493]

Edward Carpenter, philosopher and activist who was instrumental in the foundation of the Fabian Society and the Labour Party as well as in the early LGBTI western movements

Many socialists were early advocates of LGBT rights. For early socialist Charles Fourier, true freedom could only occur without suppressing passions, as the suppression of passions is not only destructive to the individual, but to society as a whole. Writing before the advent of the term "homosexuality", Fourier recognised that both men and women have a wide range of sexual needs and preferences which may change throughout their lives, including same-sex sexuality and androgénité. He argued that all sexual expressions should be enjoyed as long as people are not abused and that "affirming one's difference" can actually enhance social integration.[494][495] In Oscar Wilde's The Soul of Man Under Socialism, he advocates an egalitarian society where wealth is shared by all, while warning of the dangers of social systems that crush individuality.[496] Edward Carpenter actively campaigned for homosexual rights. His work The Intermediate Sex: A Study of Some Transitional Types of Men and Women was a 1908 book arguing for gay liberation.[497] who was an influential personality in the foundation of the Fabian Society and the Labour Party. After the Russian Revolution under the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky, the Soviet Union abolished previous laws against homosexuality.[498] Harry Hay was an early leader in the American LGBT rights movement as well as a member of the Communist Party USA. He is known for his involvement in the founding of gay organisations, including the Mattachine Society, the first sustained gay rights group in the United States which in its early days reflected a strong Marxist influence. The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality reports that "[a]s Marxists the founders of the group believed that the injustice and oppression which they suffered stemmed from relationships deeply embedded in the structure of American society".[499] Emerging from events such as the May 1968 insurrection in France, the anti-Vietnam war movement in the US and the Stonewall riots of 1969, militant gay liberation organisations began to spring up around the world. Many sprang from left radicalism more than established homophile groups,[500] although the Gay Liberation Front took an anti-capitalist stance and attacked the nuclear family and traditional gender roles.[501]

Eco-socialism is a political strain merging aspects of socialism, Marxism or libertarian socialism with green politics, ecology and alter-globalisation. Eco-socialists generally claim that the expansion of the capitalist system is the cause of social exclusion, poverty, war and environmental degradation through globalisation and imperialism under the supervision of repressive states and transnational structures.[502] Contrary to the depiction of Karl Marx by some environmentalists,[503] social ecologists[504] and fellow socialists[505] as a productivist who favoured the domination of nature, eco-socialists revisited Marx's writings and believe that he "was a main originator of the ecological world-view".[506] Marx discussed a "metabolic rift" between man and nature, stating that "private ownership of the globe by single individuals will appear quite absurd as private ownership of one man by another" and his observation that a society must "hand it [the planet] down to succeeding generations in an improved condition".[507] English socialist William Morris is credited with developing principles of what was later called eco-socialism.[508] During the 1880s and 1890s, Morris promoted his ideas within the Social Democratic Federation and Socialist League.[509] Green anarchism blends anarchism with environmental issues. An important early influence was Henry David Thoreau and his book Walden[510] as well as Élisée Reclus.[511][512]

In the late 19th century, anarcho-naturism fused anarchism and naturist philosophies within individualist anarchist circles in France, Spain, Cuba[513] and Portugal.[514] Murray Bookchin's first book Our Synthetic Environment[515] was followed by his essay "Ecology and Revolutionary Thought" which introduced ecology as a concept in radical politics.[516] In the 1970s, Barry Commoner, claimed that capitalist technologies were chiefly responsible for environmental degradation as opposed to population pressures.[517] In the 1990s socialist/feminists Mary Mellor[518] and Ariel Salleh[519] adopt an eco-socialist paradigm. An "environmentalism of the poor" combining ecological awareness and social justice has also become prominent.[520] Pepper critiqued the current approach of many within green politics, particularly deep ecologists.[521]

### Syndicalism

Main article: Social:Syndicalism

Syndicalism operates through industrial trade unions. It rejects state socialism and the use of establishment politics. Syndicalists reject state power in favour of strategies such as the general strike. Syndicalists advocate a socialist economy based on federated unions or syndicates of workers who own and manage the means of production. Some Marxist currents advocate syndicalism, such as De Leonism. Anarcho-syndicalism views syndicalism as a method for workers in capitalist society to gain control of an economy. The Spanish Revolution was largely orchestrated by the anarcho-syndicalist trade union CNT.[522] The International Workers' Association is an international federation of anarcho-syndicalist labour unions and initiatives.[523]

## Public views

A multitude of polls have found significant levels of support for socialism among modern populations.[524][525]

A 2018 IPSOS poll found that 50% of the respondents globally strongly or somewhat agreed that present socialist values were of great value for societal progress. In China this was 84%, India 72%, Malaysia 62%, Turkey 62%, South Africa 57%, Brazil 57%, Russia 55%, Spain 54%, Argentina 52%, Mexico 51%, Saudi Arabia 51%, Sweden 49%, Canada 49%, Great Britain 49%, Australia 49%, Poland 48%, Chile 48%, South Korea 48%, Peru 48%, Italy 47%, Serbia 47%, Germany 45%, Belgium 44%, Romania 40%, United States 39%, France 31%, Hungary 28% and Japan 21%.[526]

A 2021 survey conducted by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) found that 67% of young British (16-24) respondents wanted to live in a socialist economic system and 75% agreed with the view that climate change was a specifically capitalist problem.[527]

A 2021 Axios poll found that 51% of 18-34 US adults had a positive view of socialism and 41% of Americans more generally had a positive view compared to 52% of those who viewing socialism more negatively.[528]

In 2023, the Fraser Institute published findings which found that 42% of Canadians viewed socialism as the ideal system compared to 43% of British respondents, 40% Australian respondents and 31% American respondents. Overall support for socialism ranged from 50% of Canadians 18-24 year olds to 28% of Canadians over 55.[529]

## Criticism

Main article: Social:Criticism of socialism

L–R: Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, economists belonging to the Chicago and Austrian schools of economics and critics of socialism in the 20th century

According to analytical Marxist sociologist Erik Olin Wright, "The Right condemned socialism as violating individual rights to private property and unleashing monstrous forms of state oppression", while "the Left saw it as opening up new vistas of social equality, genuine freedom and the development of human potentials."[530]

Because of socialism's many varieties, most critiques have focused on a specific approach. Proponents of one approach typically criticise others. Socialism has been criticised in terms of its models of economic organization as well as its political and social implications. Other critiques are directed at the socialist movement, parties, or existing states.

Some forms of criticism occupy theoretical grounds, such as in the economic calculation problem presented by proponents of the Austrian School as part of the socialist calculation debate, while others support their criticism by examining historical attempts to establish socialist societies. The economic calculation problem concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system.[531][532][533] Central planning is also criticized by elements of the radical left. Libertarian socialist economist Robin Hahnel notes that even if central planning overcame its inherent inhibitions of incentives and innovation, it would nevertheless be unable to maximize economic democracy and self-management, which he believes are concepts that are more intellectually coherent, consistent and just than mainstream notions of economic freedom.[534]

Economic liberals and right-libertarians argue that private ownership of the means of production and market exchange are natural entities or moral rights which are central to freedom and liberty and argue that the economic dynamics of capitalism are immutable and absolute. As such, they also argue that public ownership of the means of production and economic planning are infringements upon liberty.[535][536]

Critics of socialism have argued that in any society where everyone holds equal wealth, there can be no material incentive to work because one does not receive rewards for a work well done. They further argue that incentives increase productivity for all people and that the loss of those effects would lead to stagnation. Some critics of socialism argue that income sharing reduces individual incentives to work and therefore incomes should be individualized as much as possible.[537]

Some philosophers have also criticized the aims of socialism, arguing that equality erodes away at individual diversities and that the establishment of an equal society would have to entail strong coercion.[538]

Milton Friedman argued that the absence of private economic activity would enable political leaders to grant themselves coercive powers, powers that, under a capitalist system, would instead be granted by a capitalist class, which Friedman found preferable.[539]

Many commentators on the political right point to the mass killings under communist regimes, claiming them as an indictment of socialism.[540][541][542] Opponents of this view, including supporters of socialism, state that these killings were aberrations caused by specific authoritarian regimes, and not caused by socialism itself, and draw comparisons to killings and excess deaths under colonialism and anti-communist authoritarian governments.[543]

## See also

* Anarchism and socialism
* Critique of work
* List of socialist parties with national parliamentary representation
* List of communist ideologies
* List of socialist songs
* List of socialist states
* Paris Commune
* Socialist democracy
* Scientific socialism
* Marxian critique of political economy
* Why Socialism? – an article written by Albert Einstein
* Zenitism

## References

1. ↑ Busky (2000), p. 2: "Socialism may be defined as movements for social ownership and control of the economy. It is this idea that is the common element found in the many forms of socialism."
2. ↑
* Busky (2000), p. 2: "Socialism may be defined as movements for social ownership and control of the economy. It is this idea that is the common element found in the many forms of socialism."
* Arnold (1994), pp. 7–8: "What else does a socialist economic system involve? Those who favor socialism generally speak of social ownership, social control, or socialization of the means of production as the distinctive positive feature of a socialist economic system."
* Horvat (2000), pp. 1515–1516: "Just as private ownership defines capitalism, social ownership defines socialism. The essential characteristic of socialism in theory is that it destroys social hierarchies, and therefore leads to a politically and economically egalitarian society. Two closely related consequences follow. First, every individual is entitled to an equal ownership share that earns an aliquot part of the total social dividend... Second, in order to eliminate social hierarchy in the workplace, enterprises are run by those employed, and not by the representatives of private or state capital. Thus, the well-known historical tendency of the divorce between ownership and management is brought to an end. The society—i.e. every individual equally—owns capital and those who work are entitled to manage their own economic affairs."
* Rosser & Barkley (2003), p. 53: "Socialism is an economic system characterised by state or collective ownership of the means of production, land, and capital.";
* Badie, Berg-Schlosser & Morlino (2011), p. 2456: "Socialist systems are those regimes based on the economic and political theory of socialism, which advocates public ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources."
* Zimbalist, Sherman & Brown (1988), p. 7: "Pure socialism is defined as a system wherein all of the means of production are owned and run by the government and/or cooperative, nonprofit groups."
* Brus (2015), p. 87: "This alteration in the relationship between economy and politics is evident in the very definition of a socialist economic system. The basic characteristic of such a system is generally reckoned to be the predominance of the social ownership of the means of production."
* Hastings, Adrian; Mason, Alistair; Pyper, Hugh (2000). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. p. 677. ISBN 978-0198600244. https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast/page/677. "Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one...Nevertheless, socialism has throughout its history been inseparable from some form of common ownership. By its very nature it involves the abolition of private ownership of capital; bringing the means of production, distribution, and exchange into public ownership and control is central to its philosophy. It is difficult to see how it can survive, in theory or practice, without this central idea."
3. ↑ Horvat (2000), pp. 1515–1516.
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Arnold (1994), pp. 7–8.
5. ↑ Hastings, Adrian; Mason, Alistair; Pyper, Hugh (2000). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. p. 677. ISBN 978-0198600244. https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast/page/677. "Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one...Nevertheless, socialism has throughout its history been inseparable from some form of common ownership. By its very nature it involves the abolition of private ownership of capital; bringing the means of production, distribution, and exchange into public ownership and control is central to its philosophy. It is difficult to see how it can survive, in theory or practice, without this central idea."
6. ↑ "Socialism". http://www.thefreedictionary.com/socialism. "2. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) any of various social or political theories or movements in which the common welfare is to be achieved through the establishment of a socialist economic system."
7. ↑ Sherman, Howard J.; Zimbalist, Andrew (1988). Comparing Economic Systems: A Political-Economic Approach. Harcourt College Pub. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-15-512403-5. https://archive.org/details/comparingeconomi0000zimb_q8i6/page/7. "Pure socialism is defined as a system wherein all of the means of production are owned and run by the government and/or cooperative, nonprofit groups."
8. ↑ Rosser, Mariana V.; Rosser, J. Barkley (23 July 2003). Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. MIT Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-262-18234-8. https://archive.org/details/comparativeecono00jrjb. "Socialism is an economic system characterised by state or collective ownership of the means of production, land, and capital."
9. ↑ Badie, Berg-Schlosser & Morlino (2011), p. 2456: "Socialist systems are those regimes based on the economic and political theory of socialism, which advocates public ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources."
10. ↑ Horvat (2000), pp. 1515–1516: "Just as private ownership defines capitalism, social ownership defines socialism. The essential characteristic of socialism in theory is that it destroys social hierarchies, and therefore leads to a politically and economically egalitarian society. Two closely related consequences follow. First, every individual is entitled to an equal ownership share that earns an aliquot part of the total social dividend...Second, in order to eliminate social hierarchy in the workplace, enterprises are run by those employed, and not by the representatives of private or state capital. Thus, the well-known historical tendency of the divorce between ownership and management is brought to an end. The society—i.e. every individual equally—owns capital and those who work are entitled to manage their own economic affairs."
11. ↑ O'Hara, Phillip (2003). Encyclopedia of Political Economy. 2. Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-0415241878. "In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity."
12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 1.
13. ↑ Hastings, Adrian; Mason, Alistair; Pyper, Hugh (2000). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. p. 677. ISBN 978-0198600244. https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast/page/677. "Socialists have always recognised that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one ... Nevertheless, socialism has throughout its history been inseparable from some form of common ownership. By its very nature it involves the abolition of private ownership of capital; bringing the means of production, distribution, and exchange into public ownership and control is central to its philosophy. It is difficult to see how it can survive, in theory or practice, without this central idea."
14. ↑ "Left". Encyclopædia Britannica. 15 April 2009. https://www.britannica.com/topic/left. Retrieved 22 May 2022. "Socialism is the standard leftist ideology in most countries of the world; ... .".
15. ↑ Nove, Alec (2008). "Socialism". Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000173. "A society may be defined as socialist if the major part of the means of production of goods and services is in some sense socially owned and operated, by state, socialised or cooperative enterprises. The practical issues of socialism comprise the relationships between management and workforce within the enterprise, the interrelationships between production units (plan versus markets), and, if the state owns and operates any part of the economy, who controls it and how."
16. ↑ Docherty, James C.; Lamb, Peter, eds (2006). Historical Dictionary of Socialism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements. 73 (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-0810855601.
17. ↑ Kolb, Robert (2007). Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, First Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc. p. 1345. ISBN 978-1412916523. "There are many forms of socialism, all of which eliminate private ownership of capital and replace it with collective ownership. These many forms, all focused on advancing distributive justice for long-term social welfare, can be divided into two broad types of socialism: nonmarket and market."
18. ↑ Bockman (2011), p. 20: "socialism would function without capitalist economic categories—such as money, prices, interest, profits and rent—and thus would function according to laws other than those described by current economic science. While some socialists recognised the need for money and prices at least during the transition from capitalism to socialism, socialists more commonly believed that the socialist economy would soon administratively mobilise the economy in physical units without the use of prices or money."; Steele (1999), pp. 175–177: "Especially before the 1930s, many socialists and anti-socialists implicitly accepted some form of the following for the incompatibility of state-owned industry and factor markets. A market transaction is an exchange of property titles between two independent transactors. Thus internal market exchanges cease when all of industry is brought into the ownership of a single entity, whether the state or some other organization, ... the discussion applies equally to any form of social or community ownership, where the owning entity is conceived as a single organization or administration."; Arneson (1992): "Marxian socialism is often identified with the call to organize economic activity on a nonmarket basis."; Schweickart et al. (1998), pp. 61–63: "More fundamentally, a socialist society must be one in which the economy is run on the principle of the direct satisfaction of human needs. ... Exchange-value, prices and so money are goals in themselves in a capitalist society or in any market. There is no necessary connection between the accumulation of capital or sums of money and human welfare. Under conditions of backwardness, the spur of money and the accumulation of wealth has led to a massive growth in industry and technology ... . It seems an odd argument to say that a capitalist will only be efficient in producing use-value of a good quality when trying to make more money than the next capitalist. It would seem easier to rely on the planning of use-values in a rational way, which because there is no duplication, would be produced more cheaply and be of a higher quality."
19. ↑ Nove (1991), p. 13: "Under socialism, by definition, it (private property and factor markets) would be eliminated. There would then be something like 'scientific management', 'the science of socially organized production', but it would not be economics."; Kotz (2006): "This understanding of socialism was held not just by revolutionary Marxist socialists but also by evolutionary socialists, Christian socialists, and even anarchists. At that time, there was also wide agreement about the basic institutions of the future socialist system: public ownership instead of private ownership of the means of production, economic planning instead of market forces, production for use instead of for profit."; Weisskopf (1992): "Socialism has historically been committed to the improvement of people's material standards of living. Indeed, in earlier days many socialists saw the promotion of improving material living standards as the primary basis for socialism's claim to superiority over capitalism, for socialism was to overcome the irrationality and inefficiency seen as endemic to a capitalist system of economic organization."; Prychitko (2002), p. 12: "Socialism is a system based upon de facto public or social ownership of the means of production, the abolition of a hierarchical division of labor in the enterprise, a consciously organized social division of labor. Under socialism, money, competitive pricing, and profit-loss accounting would be destroyed."
20. ↑ Marangos, John (2004). "Social Dividend versus Basic Income Guarantee in Market Socialism". International Journal of Political Economy (Taylor & Francis) 34 (3): 20–40. doi:10.1080/08911916.2004.11042930.
21. ↑ O'Hara, Phillip (2000). Encyclopedia of Political Economy. 2. Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-0415241878. "Market socialism is the general designation for a number of models of economic systems. On the one hand, the market mechanism is utilized to distribute economic output, to organize production and to allocate factor inputs. On the other hand, the economic surplus accrues to society at large rather than to a class of private (capitalist) owners, through some form of collective, public or social ownership of capital."
22. ↑ Pierson, Christopher (1995). Socialism After Communism: The New Market Socialism. Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0271-014784. "At the heart of the market socialist model is the abolition of the large-scale private ownership of capital and its replacement by some form of 'social ownership'. Even the most conservative accounts of market socialism insist that this abolition of large-scale holdings of private capital is essential. This requirement is fully consistent with the market socialists' general claim that the vices of market capitalism lie not with the institutions of the market but with (the consequences of) the private ownership of capital ... ."
23. ↑ Newman (2005), p. 2: "In fact, socialism has been both centralist and local; organized from above and built from below; visionary and pragmatic; revolutionary and reformist; anti-state and statist; internationalist and nationalist; harnessed to political parties and shunning them; an outgrowth of trade unionism and independent of it; a feature of rich industrialized countries and poor peasant-based communities."
24. ↑ Ely, Richard T. (1883). French and German Socialism in Modern Times. New York: Harper and Brothers. pp. 204–205. "Social democrats forms the extreme wing of the socialists ... inclined to lay so much stress on equality of enjoyment, regardless of the value of one's labor, that they might, perhaps, more properly be called communists. ... They have two distinguishing characteristics. The vast majority of them are laborers, and, as a rule, they expect the violent overthrow of existing institutions by revolution to precede the introduction of the socialistic state. I would not, by any means, say that they are all revolutionists, but the most of them undoubtedly are. ... The most general demands of the social democrats are the following: The state should exist exclusively for the laborers; land and capital must become collective property, and production be carried on unitedly. Private competition, in the ordinary sense of the term, is to cease."
25. ↑ Merkel, Wolfgang; Petring, Alexander; Henkes, Christian; Egle, Christoph (2008). Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform. Routledge Research in Comparative Politics. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415438209.
26. ↑ Heywood, Andrew (2012). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (5th ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 128. ISBN 978-0230367258. "Social democracy is an ideological stance that supports a broad balance between market capitalism, on the one hand, and state intervention, on the other hand. Being based on a compromise between the market and the state, social democracy lacks a systematic underlying theory and is, arguably, inherently vague. It is nevertheless associated with the following views: (1) capitalism is the only reliable means of generating wealth, but it is a morally defective means of distributing wealth because of its tendency towards poverty and inequality; (2) the defects of the capitalist system can be rectified through economic and social intervention, the state being the custodian of the public interest ... ."
27. ↑ Roemer (1994), pp. 25–27: "The long term and the short term."; Berman (1998), p. 57: "Over the long term, however, democratizing Sweden's political system was seen to be important not merely as a means but also as an end in itself. Achieving democracy was crucial not only because it would increase the power of the SAP in the Swedish political system but also because it was the form socialism would take once it arrived. Political, economic, and social equality went hand in hand, according to the SAP, and were all equally important characteristics of the future socialist society."; Busky (2000), pp. 7–8; Bailey (2009), p. 77: "... Giorgio Napolitano launched a medium-term programme, 'which tended to justify the governmental deflationary policies, and asked for the understanding of the workers, since any economic recovery would be linked with the long-term goal of an advance towards democratic socialism'"; Lamb (2015), p. 415
28. ↑ Badie, Berg-Schlosser & Morlino (2011), p. 2423: "Social democracy refers to a political tendency resting on three fundamental features: (1) democracy (e.g., equal rights to vote and form parties), (2) an economy partly regulated by the state (e.g., through Keynesianism), and (3) a welfare state offering social support to those in need (e.g., equal rights to education, health service, employment and pensions)."
29. ↑ Smith, J. W. (2005). Economic Democracy: The Political Struggle for the 21st century. Radford: Institute for Economic Democracy Press. ISBN 1933567-015.
30. ↑ Gasper, Phillip (2005). The Communist Manifesto: A Road Map to History's Most Important Political Document. Haymarket Books. p. 24. ISBN 978-1931859257. "As the nineteenth century progressed, 'socialist' came to signify not only concern with the social question, but opposition to capitalism and support for some form of social ownership."
31. ↑ Giddens, Anthony (1998). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics (1998 ed.). Cambridge, England, UK: Polity Press. pp. 71.
32. ↑ Newman (2005), p. 5: "Chapter 1 looks at the foundations of the doctrine by examining the contribution made by various traditions of socialism in the period between the early 19th century and the aftermath of the First World War. The two forms that emerged as dominant by the early 1920s were social democracy and communism."
33. ↑ Kurian, George Thomas, ed (2011). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. pp. 1554.
34. ↑ Sheldon, Garrett Ward (2001). Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Facts on File. Inc.. pp. 280.
35. ↑ Chomsky, Noam (Spring–Summer 1986). "The Soviet Union Versus Socialism". Our Generation. https://chomsky.info/1986____/. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
36. ↑ Howard, M. C.; King, J. E. (2001). "State Capitalism' in the Soviet Union". History of Economics Review 34 (1): 110–126. doi:10.1080/10370196.2001.11733360. http://www.hetsa.org.au/pdf/34-A-08.pdf. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
37. ↑ Fitzgibbons, Daniel J. (11 October 2002). "USSR strayed from communism, say Economics professors". University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/pubaffs/chronicle/archives/02/10-11/economics.html. See also Wolff, Richard D. (27 June 2015). "Socialism Means Abolishing the Distinction Between Bosses and Employees". https://truthout.org/articles/socialism-means-abolishing-the-distinction-between-bosses-and-employees/.
38. ↑ Barrett (1978): "If we were to extend the definition of socialism to include Labor Britain or socialist Sweden, there would be no difficulty in refuting the connection between capitalism and democracy."; Heilbroner (1991), pp. 96–110; Kendall (2011), pp. 125–127: "Sweden, Great Britain, and France have mixed economies, sometimes referred to as democratic socialism—an economic and political system that combines private ownership of some of the means of production, governmental distribution of some essential goods and services, and free elections. For example, government ownership in Sweden is limited primarily to railroads, mineral resources, a public bank, and liquor and tobacco operations."; Li (2015), pp. 60–69: "The scholars in camp of democratic socialism believe that China should draw on the Sweden experience, which is suitable not only for the West but also for China. In the post-Mao China, the Chinese intellectuals are confronted with a variety of models. The liberals favor the American model and share the view that the Soviet model has become archaic and should be totally abandoned. Meanwhile, democratic socialism in Sweden provided an alternative model. Its sustained economic development and extensive welfare programs fascinated many. Numerous scholars within the democratic socialist camp argue that China should model itself politically and economically on Sweden, which is viewed as more genuinely socialist than China. There is a growing consensus among them that in the Nordic countries the welfare state has been extraordinarily successful in eliminating poverty."
39. ↑ Sanandaji (2021): "Nordic nations—and especially Sweden—did embrace socialism between around 1970 and 1990. During the past 30 years, however, both conservative and social democratic-led governments have moved toward the center."
40. ↑ Sanandaji (2021); Caulcutt (2022); Krause-Jackson (2019); Best et al. (2011), p. xviii
41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 "socialism". 29 May 2023. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism.
42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Judis, John B. (2019-11-20). "The Socialist Revival" (in en-US). https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/11/the-socialist-revival/.
43. ↑ Cassidy, John (2019-06-18). "Why Socialism Is Back" (in en-US). The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/why-socialism-is-back. Retrieved 2023-06-26.
44. ↑ Vincent, Andrew (2010). Modern Political Ideologies. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 83. ISBN 978-1405154956.
45. ↑ "socialism (n.)". Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com/word/socialism.
46. ↑ Kołakowski, Leszek (2005). Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders, the Golden Age, the Breakdown. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 151. ISBN 978-0393-060546. https://books.google.com/books?id=qUCxpznbkaoC.
47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 Perry, Marvin; Chase, Myrna; Jacob, Margaret; Jacob, James R. (2009). Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society – From 1600. 2 (Ninth ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. p. 540. ISBN 9781305445499. OCLC 1289795802.
48. ↑ Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2013). The Global Economy and its Economic Systems. South-Western College Publishing. p. 159. ISBN 978-1285-05535-0. "Socialist writers of the nineteenth century proposed socialist arrangements for sharing as a response to the inequality and poverty of the industrial revolution. English socialist Robert Owen proposed that ownership and production take place in cooperatives, where all members shared equally. French socialist Henri Saint-Simon proposed to the contrary: socialism meant solving economic problems by means of state administration and planning, and taking advantage of new advances in science."
49. ↑ .
50. ↑ Russell, Bertrand (1972). A History of Western Philosophy. Touchstone. pp. 781.
51. ↑ Williams, Raymond (1983). "Socialism". Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition. Oxford University Press. p. 288. ISBN 978-0195204698. https://archive.org/details/keywordsvocabula00willrich/page/288. "Modern usage began to settle from the 1860s, and in spite of the earlier variations and distinctions it was socialist and socialism which came through as the predominant words ... Communist, in spite of the distinction that had been made in the 1840s, was very much less used, and parties in the Marxist tradition took some variant of social and socialist as titles."
52. ↑ Steele, David (1992). From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. Open Court Publishing Company. p. 43. ISBN 978-0875484495. "One widespread distinction was that socialism socialised production only while communism socialised production and consumption."
53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 Steele, David (1992). From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. Open Court Publishing Company. pp. 44–45. ISBN 978-0875484495. "By 1888, the term 'socialism' was in general use among Marxists, who had dropped 'communism', now considered an old fashioned term meaning the same as 'socialism'. ... At the turn of the century, Marxists called themselves socialists. ... The definition of socialism and communism as successive stages was introduced into Marxist theory by Lenin in 1917. ... the new distinction was helpful to Lenin in defending his party against the traditional Marxist criticism that Russia was too backward for a socialist revolution."
54. ↑ Busky (2000), p. 9: "In a modern sense of the word, communism refers to the ideology of Marxism–Leninism."
55. ↑ Williams, Raymond (1983). "Socialism". Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (revised ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0195204698. https://archive.org/details/keywordsvocabula00willrich/page/289. "The decisive distinction between socialist and communist, as in one sense these terms are now ordinarily used, came with the renaming, in 1918, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks) as the All-Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks). From that time on, a distinction of socialist from communist, often with supporting definitions such as social democrat or democratic socialist, became widely current, although it is significant that all communist parties, in line with earlier usage, continued to describe themselves as socialist and dedicated to socialism."
56. ↑ 56.0 56.1 Hudis, Peter; Vidal, Matt; Smith, Tony et al., eds (September 2018 – June 2019). "Marx's Concept of Socialism". The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695545.001.0001. ISBN 978-019-0695545. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695545.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190695545-e-50.
57. ↑ Williams, Raymond (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Fontana Books. ISBN 978-0-006334798.
58. ↑ Engels, Friedrich (2002). Preface to the 1888 English Edition of the Communist Manifesto. Penguin Books. pp. 202.
59. ↑ Todorova, Maria (2020). The Lost World of Socialists at Europe's Margins: Imagining Utopia, 1870s–1920s (hardcover ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1350150331.
60. ↑ Wilson, Fred (2007). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
61. ↑ Baum, Bruce (2007). "J. S. Mill and Liberal Socialism". in Urbanati, Nadia; Zacharas, Alex. J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. "Mill, in contrast, advances a form of liberal democratic socialism for the enlargement of freedom as well as to realise social and distributive justice. He offers a powerful account of economic injustice and justice that is centered on his understanding of freedom and its conditions."
62. ↑ Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, IV.7.21. John Stuart Mill: Political Economy, IV.7.21. "The form of association, however, which if mankind continue to improve, must be expected in the end to predominate, is not that which can exist between a capitalist as chief, and work-people without a voice in the management, but the association of the labourers themselves on terms of equality, collectively owning the capital with which they carry on their operations, and working under managers elected and removable by themselves."
63. ↑ Gildea, Robert. "1848 in European Collective Memory". in Evans; Strandmann. The Revolutions in Europe, 1848–1849. pp. 207–235.
64. ↑ Boesche, Roger (2003). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lexington Books. p. 67. ISBN 978-07391-06075. https://books.google.com/books?id=K85NA7Rg67wC&pg=PA67.
65. ↑ Mookerji, Radhakumud. Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 102. "Kautiliya polity was based on a considerable amount of socialism and nationalisation of industries."
66. ↑ Taylor, A.E. (2001). Plato: The Man and His Work. Dover. pp. 276–277.
67. ↑ Ross, W. D.. Aristotle (6 ed.). pp. 257.
68. ↑ A Short History of the World. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1974.
69. ↑ Esposito (1995), p. 19; Oxford Islamic Studies Online; Hanna & Gardner (1969), pp. 273–274; Hanna (1969), pp. 275–286
70. ↑ And Once Again Abu Dharr. http://www.iranchamber.com/personalities/ashariati/works/once_again_abu_dhar1.php. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
71. ↑ Eagleton, Terry (2007). Fraser, Giles. ed. The Gospels: Jesus Christ. Verso Books. ISBN 9781844671762.
72. ↑ Salter, Alexander William (21 April 2022). "Opinion | Jesus a Socialist? That's a Myth" (in en-US). https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-jesus-socialism-acts-new-testament-christianity-catholic-protestant-marx-communism-st-paul-11650575604.
73. ↑ Walden, Daniel (5 September 2020). "Was Jesus A Socialist?" (in en). Current Affairs. ISSN 2471-2647. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2020/09/was-jesus-a-socialist.
74. ↑ Acts 4:32–35: "32Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. 33With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. 34There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. 35They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need."
75. ↑ Routledge, Paul (21 May 1994). "Labour revives faith in Christian Socialism". The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/labour-revives-faith-in-christian-socialism-1437750.html.
76. ↑ 76.0 76.1 Kurian, Thomas, ed (2011). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. p. 1555.
77. ↑ Paine, Thomas (2004). Common sense [with] Agrarian justice. Penguin Books. pp. 92–93. ISBN 0141018909.
78. ↑ Blaug, Mark (1986). Who's Who in Economics: A Biographical Dictionary of Major Economists 1700–1986. The MIT Press. p. 358. ISBN 978-0262-022569.
79. ↑ Bonnett, Alastair (2007). "The Other Rights of Man: The Revolutionary Plan of Thomas Spence". History Today 57 (9): 42–48.
80. ↑ Vincent, Andrew (2010). Modern political ideologies. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 88.
81. ↑ Jitendra, Uttam (2005). "Socialism". in Carlisle, Rodney P.. Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left. SAGE Publications. pp. 399–403. ISBN 1412904099.
82. ↑ Cole, G. D. H. (1953). Socialist Thought: The Forerunners. Macmillan & Co. pp. 1.
83. ↑ Brandal, Bratberg & Thorsen (2013), p. 20.
84. ↑ "Socialism". Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 29 May 2023. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism. "The origins of socialism as a political movement lie in the Industrial Revolution.".
85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 85.2 "Adam Smith". Fsmitha.com. http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h44-ph.html.
86. ↑ "2: Birth of the Socialist Idea". Anu.edu.au. http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/contemp/pamsetc/socfrombel/sfb_2.htm.
87. ↑ 87.0 87.1 87.2 87.3 87.4 Newman (2005).
88. ↑ Bey, Hakim. The Lemonade Ocean & Modern Times A Position Paper. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hakim-bey-the-lemonade-ocean-modern-times. "In Fourier's system of Harmony all creative activity including industry, craft, agriculture, etc. will arise from liberated passion—this is the famous theory of "attractive labour." Fourier sexualises work itself—the life of the Phalanstery is a continual orgy of intense feeling, intellection, & activity, a society of lovers & wild enthusiasts....The Harmonian does not live with some 1600 people under one roof because of compulsion or altruism, but because of the sheer pleasure of all the social, sexual, economic, "gastrosophic," cultural, & creative relations this association allows & encourages."
89. ↑ Rougerie, Jacques (2014) (in fr). La Commune de Paris. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. ISBN 978-213-0620785.
90. ↑ Milza, Pierre (in fr). La Commune.
91. ↑ Blin, Arnaud (2007). The History of Terrorism. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 116. ISBN 978-0520247093. https://archive.org/details/historyofterrori00grar/page/116.
92. ↑ Woodcock (1962), p. 243: "It is unnecessary to repeat the accounts of the Geneva and Hague Congresses of the International in which the issues between Marx and Bakunin were fought out and the organisation itself split apart into the dying Marxist rump centered around the New York General Council and the anti-authoritarian majority centred around the Bakuninist Jura Federation. But it is desirable to consider some of the factors underlying the final emergence of a predominantly anarchist International in 1872."
93. ↑ Malatesta, Errico. "A Talk About Anarchist Communism Between Two Workers". http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_Archives/malatesta/MalatestaATAC.html.
94. ↑ Pernicone, Nunzio (2009). Italian Anarchism 1864–1892. AK Press. pp. 111–113.
95. ↑ Guillaume, James (1971). "Michael Bakunin – A Biographical Sketch". in Dolgoff, Sam. Bakunin on Anarchy. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/guillaume/works/bakunin.htm.
96. ↑ 96.0 96.1 96.2 96.3 "Socialism". 29 May 2023. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism.
97. ↑ "Syndicalism – Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary". http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/syndicalism.
98. ↑ Wiarda, Howard J. (1996). Corporatism and comparative politics. M. E. Sharpe. pp. 65–66, 156.
99. ↑ Rocker, Rudolf (2004). Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory and Practice. AK Press. pp. 73.
100. ↑ Cole, Margaret (1961). The Story of Fabian Socialism. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-08047-00917. https://archive.org/details/storyoffabiansoc0000cole.
101. ↑ Discovering Imperialism: Social Democracy to World War I. 25 November 2011. p. 249. "the pro-imperialist majority, led by Sidney Webb and George Bernard Shaw, advanced an intellectual justification for central control by the British Empire, arguing that existing institutions should simply work more 'efficiently'."
102. ↑ "Guild Socialism". 8 June 2023. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/248652/Guild-Socialism.
103. ↑ Hewes, Amy (1922). "Guild Socialism: A Two Years' Test". The American Economic Review 12 (2): 209–237. ISSN 0002-8282.
104. ↑ "Second (Socialist) International (1889–1923) organizational history". Marxists Internet Archive. http://www.marxisthistory.org/subject/usa/eam/secondinternational.html.
105. ↑ 105.0 105.1 Woodcock (1962), pp. 263–264.
106. ↑ Marx, Engels, Communist Manifesto, Selected Works, p. 52
107. ↑ Rubio, José Luis (1971) (in es). Las internacionales obreras en América. Madrid: Graficas Reunidas. p. 49.
108. ↑ Rhodes, Campbell (30 April 2013). "A perfect picture of the statesman: John Christian Watson". Museum of Australian Democracy. https://moadoph.gov.au/blog/a-perfect-picture-of-the-statesman-john-christian-watson/.
109. ↑ Blainey, Geoffrey (2000). A shorter history of Australia. Milsons Point, N.S.W.: Vintage Books. pp. 125–126. ISBN 174051033X. https://archive.org/details/shorterhistoryof0000blai/page/263.
110. ↑ "Adult Children of the Dream". 5 June 2010. http://www.jpost.com/Jerusalem-Report/Adult-Children-of-the-Dream.
111. ↑ Docherty, James C. (1997). Historical dictionary of socialism. London: The Scarecrow Press Inc.. p. 144.
112. ↑ Balaam, David N.; Veseth, Michael (2001). "Commanding Heights: Lenin's Critique of Global Capitalism". PBS. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/ess_leninscritique.html.
113. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1964). "Meeting of the Petrograd Soviet of workers and soldiers' deputies 25 January 1918". Collected Works. 26. Lawrence & Wishart. p. 239.
114. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1964). "To workers Soldiers and Peasants". Collected Works. 26. Lawrence & Wishart. p. 247.
115. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1964). Collected Works. 26. Lawrence & Wishart. pp. 264–265.
116. ↑ Caplan, Brian. "Lenin and the First Communist Revolutions, IV". George Mason University. http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/his1d.htm.
117. ↑ Adams, Katherine H.; Keene, Michael L. (10 January 2014) (in en). After the Vote Was Won: The Later Achievements of Fifteen Suffragists. McFarland. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-7864-5647-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=oyaxYvSG6gAC&dq=lenin+universal+literacy+after+the+vote+was+won&pg=PA109.
118. ↑ Ugri͡umov, Aleksandr Leontʹevich (1976) (in en). Lenin's Plan for Building Socialism in the USSR, 1917–1925. Novosti Press Agency Publishing House. p. 48. https://books.google.com/books?id=gXknAQAAMAAJ&q=lenin+universal+literacy.
119. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1964). "Declaration of the RSDLP (Bolsheviks) group at the Constituent Assembly meeting 5 January 1918". Collected Works. 26. Lawrence & Wishart. p. 429.
120. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1964). "Draft Decree on the Dissolution of the Constituent Assembly". Collected Works. 26. Lawrence & Wishart. p. 434.
121. ↑ Payne, Robert. The Life and Death of Lenin. Grafton. pp. 425–440.
122. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 77.
123. ↑ "Famine in Russia, 1921–1922". https://warwick.ac.uk/services/library/mrc/archives_online/digital/russia/famine/.
124. ↑ Ther, Philipp (2016). Europe since 1989: A History. Princeton University Press. p. 132. ISBN 978-0691167374. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/10812.html. "Stalinist regimes aimed to catapult the predominantly agrarian societies into the modern age by swift industrialization. At the same time, they hoped to produce politically loyal working classes by mass employment in large state industries. Steelworks were built in Eisenhüttenstadt (GDR), Nowa Huta (Poland), Košice (Slovakia), and Miskolc (Hungary), as were various mechanical engineering and chemical combines and other industrial sites. As a result of communist modernization, living standards in Eastern Europe rose. Planned economies, moreover, meant that wages, salaries, and the prices of consumer goods were fixed. Although the communists were not able to cancel out all regional differences, they succeeded in creating largely egalitarian societies."
125. ↑ Bertil, Hessel (1980). "Introduction". Theses, Resolutions and Manifestos of the first four congresses of the Third International. Ink Links. p. xiii.
126. ↑ "We have always proclaimed, and repeated, this elementary truth of Marxism, that the victory of socialism requires the joint efforts of workers in a number of advanced countries." Lenin, Sochineniya (Works), 5th ed. Vol. XLIV, p. 418, February 1922. (Quoted by Mosche Lewin in Lenin's Last Struggle, p. 4. Pluto (1975))
127. ↑ "The Munich Soviet (or "Council Republic") of 1919 exhibited certain features of the TAZ, even though—like most revolutions—its stated goals were not exactly "temporary". Gustav Landauer's participation as Minister of Culture, along with Silvio Gesell as Minister of Economics and other anti-authoritarian and extreme libertarian socialists such as the poet/playwrights Erich Mühsam and Ernst Toller, and Ret Marut (the novelist B. Traven), gave the Soviet a distinct anarchist flavor." Hakim Bey. "T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism"
128. ↑ Gaab, Jeffrey S. (2006). Munich: Hofbräuhaus & History: Beer, Culture, & Politics. Peter Lang. p. 59. ISBN 978-0820486062. https://books.google.com/books?id=-X4jgPG0360C&pg=PA58.
129. ↑ Taylor, Edumund (1963). The Fall of the Dynasties: The Collapse of Old Order. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. 365.
130. ↑ Werner, Paul; Frölich, Paul (in de). Die Bayerische Räterepublik. Tatsachen und Kritik. p. 144.
131. ↑ Janos, Andrew C. & Slottman, William (editors) Revolution in perspective: essays on the Hungarian Soviet Republic of 1919, Center for Slavic and East European Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1971.
132. ↑ Goldstone, Jack A. (2015). The Encyclopedia of Political Revolutions. Routledge. pp. 227. ISBN 978-1135937584.
133. ↑ Sugar, Peter F.; Hanák, Péter; Frank, Tibor (1994). A History of Hungary. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0253208675.
134. ↑ Werth, Nicolas; Bartosek, Karel; Panne, Jean-Louis; Margolin, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Courtois, Stephane (1999). Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674076087.
135. ↑ Rayfield, Donald (2004). Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him. New York: Random House. p. 83.
136. ↑ "Complete Destruction of National Groups as Groups – The Crimean Turks". http://www.iccrimea.org/historical/crimeanturks.html.
137. ↑ Borsányi, The Life of a Communist Revolutionary; pp. x, 436.
138. ↑ "New information about death of Bela Kun," from BBC transmission of Hungarian Telegraph Agency in English, 14 February 1989
139. ↑ Brunella Dalla Casa, Composizione di classe, rivendicazioni e professionalità nelle lotte del "biennio rosso" a Bologna, in: AA. VV, Bologna 1920; le origini del fascismo, a cura di Luciano Casali, Cappelli, Bologna 1982, p. 179.
140. ↑ "1918–1921: The Italian factory occupations and Biennio Rosso". http://libcom.org/history/articles/italy-factory-occupations-1920.
141. ↑ The Unione Sindacale Italiana "grew to 800,000 members and the influence of the Italian Anarchist Union (20,000 members plus Umanita Nova, its daily paper) grew accordingly ... Anarchists were the first to suggest occupying workplaces." "1918–1921: The Italian factory occupations – Biennio Rosso"
142. ↑ Cartography of Revolutionary Anarchism. 2012. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/michael-schmidt-cartography-of-revolutionary-anarchism?v=1617967506. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
143. ↑ Serge, Victor. From Lenin to Stalin. p. 55.
144. ↑ Serge, Victor. From Lenin to Stalin. p. 52.
145. ↑ Brinton, Maurice (1975). "The Bolsheviks and Workers' Control 1917–1921: The State and Counter-revolution". Solidarity. http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/russia/sp001861/bolintro.html.
146. ↑ Carr, E. H. (1985). The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923. W. W. Norton & Company.
147. ↑ Avrich, Paul (July 1968). "Russian Anarchists and the Civil War". Russian Review (Blackwell Publishing) 27 (3): 296–306. doi:10.2307/127258.
148. ↑ Guttridge, Leonard F. (2006). Mutiny: A History of Naval Insurrection. Naval Institute Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-1591143482. https://books.google.com/books?id=Hk9-IMRGtbcC&pg=PA174.
149. ↑ Smele, Jonathan (2006). The Russian Revolution and Civil War 1917–1921: An Annotated Bibliography. Continuum. p. 336. ISBN 978-1591143482. https://books.google.com/books?id=XN1k1M2I060C&pg=PA628.
150. ↑ Avrich, Paul (1970). Kronstadt 1921. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691-087214.
151. ↑ Noel-Schwartz, Heather. The Makhnovists & The Russian Revolution – Organization, Peasantry and Anarchism. Archived on Internet Archive. Accessed October 2010.
152. ↑ Marshall, Peter (2010). Demanding the Impossible. PM Press. p. 473.
153. ↑ Skirda, Alexandre (2004). Nestor Makhno: Anarchy's Cossack. AK Press. p. 34.
154. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 52.
155. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 177.
156. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 197.
157. ↑ Trotsky, Leon (1938). "The Transitional Program". http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1938/tp/index.htm.
158. ↑ Beevor, Antony (2006). The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. 46. ISBN 978-0297848325.
159. ↑ Prichard, Alex (2012). Libertarian socialism: politics in black and red. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0230280373. OCLC 792880396.
160. ↑ Ness, Immanuel (2011). Ours to master and to own: workers' councils from the commune to the present. Chicago, Ill: Haymarket Books. ISBN 978-1608461196. OCLC 754714826.
161. ↑ Bolloten, Burnett (1984). The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution. University of North Carolina Press. p. 1107. ISBN 978-0807819067.
162. ↑ Dolgoff, Sam (1974). The Anarchist Collectives Workers' Self-management in the Spanish Revolution 1936–1939 (1st ed.). Free Life Editions. pp. 6–7.
163. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 320.
164. ↑ "Les trente glorieuses: 1945–1975" (in fr). Sund.ac.uk. http://www.sund.ac.uk/~os0tmc/contem/trente1.htm.
165. ↑ "Nationalisation of Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, 1951". Yourarchives.nationalarchives.gov.uk. 11 June 2007. http://yourarchives.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php?title=Nationalisation_of_Anglo-Iranian_Oil_Company,_1951.
166. ↑ Crosland, Anthony (2006). The Future of Socialism. Constable. pp. 9, 89.
167. ↑ Toye, R. (2002). "The New Commanding Height: Labour Party Policy on North Sea Oil and Gas, 1964–74". Contemporary British History 16 (1): 89–118. doi:10.1080/713999440.
168. ↑ "UK steel: EEF". UK steel. 12 September 2013. http://www.uksteel.org.uk/history.htm.
169. ↑ Bevan, Aneurin (1961). In Place of Fear (2nd ed.). MacGibbon and Kee. pp. 104.
170. ↑ Beckett (2007), p. 247.
171. ↑ Steinmo, Sven (1 September 2002). "Globalization and Taxation: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State". Political Insight 35 (7). doi:10.1177/0010414002035007004.
172. ↑ Giverholt, Helge (19 November 2018), "Tage Erlander" (in no), Store norske leksikon, http://snl.no/Tage_Erlander, retrieved 30 November 2019, "Erlander satt lenger som statsminister enn noen annen i et parlamentarisk system, og han mer enn noen annen politiker preget Sveriges utvikling de første tiårene etter andre verdenskrig. Spesielt er hans navn knyttet til utviklingen av det moderne velferdssamfunnet og Sveriges nøytralitet i etterkrigstiden."
173. ↑ Palme, Olof (1982). "Därför är jag demokratisk socialist". Speech at the 1982 congress of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.
174. ↑ Linderborg, Åsa (28 February 2006). "Detta borde vara vårt arv" (in sv). Aftonbladet. http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/kultur/story/0,2789,785030,00.html.
175. ↑ 175.0 175.1 Tvedt, Knut Are; Bull, Edvard; Garvik, Olav (14 September 2019), "Arbeiderpartiet" (in no), Store norske leksikon, http://snl.no/Arbeiderpartiet, retrieved 30 November 2019
176. ↑ 176.0 176.1 176.2 Esping-Andersen, G. (1991). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
177. ↑ "Norges Kommunistiske Parti" (in nb). Store norske leksikon. 21 July 2021. https://snl.no/Norges_Kommunistiske_Parti.
178. ↑ Fog, Mogens; Kragh, Jens, Larsen, Aksel, Moltke, Kai; Petersen, Gert (1977). Folkesocialisme. SP Forl.
179. ↑ "Arbeidernes Kommunistparti" ["Workers' Communist Party"]. Store norske leksikon (in Norwegian). Retrieved 5 August 2020.
180. ↑ Schmitt, John; Zipperer, Ben (2006). "Is the U.S. a Good Model for Reducing Social Exclusion in Europe?". The Post-autistic Economics Review. 40 (1).
181. ↑ Berman, Sheri (2006). The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. ↑ "Sosialdemokratiske partier" (in no), Store norske leksikon, 26 November 2018, http://snl.no/sosialdemokratiske_partier, retrieved 30 November 2019
183. ↑ Thorsen, Dag Einar (29 June 2019), "sosialdemokrati" (in no), Store norske leksikon, http://snl.no/sosialdemokrati, retrieved 30 November 2019, "Det forekommer også at land eller politiske systemer omtales som sosialdemokratiske, dersom slike partier har vært toneangivende i politikkutformingen over lengre tid."
184. ↑ Ferragina, Emanuele; Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (October 2011). "Welfare Regime Debate: Past, Present, Futures?". Policy and Politics (Policy Press) 39 (4): 583–611. doi:10.1332/030557311X603592. http://www.louischauvel.org/Welfare_regime_debate.pdf. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
185. ↑ 185.0 185.1 Dølvik, Jon Erik; Fløtten, Tone; Hippe, Jon M.; Jordfald, Bård (2014). "Den nordiske modellen mot 2030. Et nytt kapittel?Fafo-rapport 2014:46" (in nb-no). Fafo. https://www.fafo.no/index.php/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/item/den-nordiske-modellen-mot-2030-et-nytt-kapittel.
186. ↑ Brandal, Bratberg & Thorsen (2013).
187. ↑ Moene, Karl Ove; Wallerstein, Michael (2006). "Social democracy as a development strategy". in Bardhan, Pranab K.; Bowles, Samuel; Wallerstein, Michael. Globalization and egalitarian redistribution. pp. 148–168.
188. ↑ Byrkjeflot, Haldor (2001). "The Nordic model of democracy and management." The democratic challenge to capitalism: Management and democracy in the Nordic countries. pp. 19–45.
189. ↑ Jespersen, Kaj Pinholt (2019) (in Danish). Temaer til samfundsfag (1st ed.). Copenhagen: Columbus. pp. 49–54. ISBN 978-87-7970-505-0.
190. ↑ Hernes, Gudmund (1978): "Makt, blandingsøkonomi og blandingsadministrasjon". In Gudmund Hernes, ed., Forhandlingsøkonomi og blandingsadministrasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
191. ↑ "Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist" (in en-US). 2015-11-01. https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist/.
192. ↑ Mæland, John Gunnar; Hatland, Aksel; Pedersen, Axel West (14 October 2019), "folketrygden" (in nb), Store norske leksikon, http://snl.no/folketrygden, retrieved 19 August 2020
193. ↑ Jenssen, Dag (2005). "Fra union til sosialdemokrati" (in no). Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 22 (4): 459–463. doi:10.18261/ISSN1504-3053-2005-04-11. ISSN 1504-3053. https://www.idunn.no/nnt/2005/04/boker.
194. ↑ Mjøset, Lars; Cappelen, Ådne (2011). "The Integration of the Norwegian Oil Economy into the World Economy". The Nordic Varieties of Capitalism. Comparative Social Research. 28. pp. 167–263. doi:10.1108/S0195-6310(2011)0000028008. ISBN 978-0857247773. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0195-6310(2011)0000028008/full/html.
195. ↑ Hall, Peter A.; Gingerich, Daniel W. (2009). "Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis". British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 449–482. doi:10.1017/S0007123409000672. ISSN 0007-1234. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4481421.
196. ↑ Georgakas, Dan (1992). "The Hollywood Blacklist". Encyclopedia of the American Left (paperback ed.). Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0252062506.
197. ↑ Hirsch, Donald; Kett, Joseph F.; Trefil, James S. (2002), The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 316, ISBN 978-0618226474, https://archive.org/details/newdictionaryofc00hirs/page/316, "Eastern Bloc. The name applied to the former communist states of eastern Europe, including Yugoslavia and Albania, as well as the countries of the Warsaw Pact"
198. ↑ Satyendra, Kush (2003), Encyclopaedic dictionary of political science, Sarup & Sons, p. 65, ISBN 978-817890-0711, "the countries of Eastern Europe under communism"
199. ↑ Compare Janzen, Jörg; Taraschewski, Thomas (2009). Shahshahānī, Suhaylā. ed. Cities of Pilgrimage. Iuaes-series. 4. Münster: LIT Verlag. p. 190. ISBN 978-3825816186. https://books.google.com/books?id=0T7DAJqAN7wC. Retrieved 21 December 2012. "Until 1990, despite being a formally independent state, Mongolia had de facto been an integral part of the Soviet dominated Eastern Bloc."
200. ↑ John Rettie, "The day Khrushchev denounced Stalin", BBC, 18 February 2006.
201. ↑ Within the Italian Communist Party (PCI) a split ensued: most ordinary members and the Party leadership, including Palmiro Togliatti and Giorgio Napolitano, regarded the Hungarian insurgents as counter-revolutionaries, as reported in l'Unità, the official PCI newspaper. The following are references in English on the conflicting positions of l'Unità, Antonio Giolitti and party boss Palmiro Togliatti, Giuseppe Di Vittorio and Pietro Nenni.
202. ↑ Giuseppe Di Vittorio (chief of the Communist trade union CGIL) repudiated the leadership position as did the prominent party members Antonio Giolitti, Loris Fortuna and many other influential communist intellectuals, who later were expelled or left the party. Pietro Nenni, the national secretary of the Italian Socialist Party, a close ally of the PCI, opposed the Soviet intervention as well. Napolitano, elected in 2006 as President of the Italian Republic, wrote in his 2005 political autobiography that he regretted his justification of Soviet action in Hungary and that at the time he believed in party unity and the international leadership of Soviet communism. See Napolitano, Giorgio (2005) (in it). Dal Pci al socialismo europeo. Un'autobiografia politica (From the Communist Party to European Socialism. A political autobiography). Laterza. ISBN 978-8842077152.
203. ↑ Within the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB), dissent that began with the repudiation of Stalin by John Saville and E.P. Thompson, influential historians and members of the Communist Party Historians Group, culminated in a loss of thousands of party members as events unfolded in Hungary. Peter Fryer, correspondent for the CPGB newspaper The Daily Worker, reported accurately on the violent suppression of the uprising, but his dispatches were heavily censored; Fryer resigned from the paper upon his return, and was later expelled from the Communist Party. Fryer, Peter (1957). Hungarian Tragedy. London: D. Dobson. Chapter 9 (The Second Soviet Intervention). ASIN B0007J7674.
204. ↑ In France, moderate Communists, such as historian Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, resigned, questioning the policy of supporting Soviet actions by the French Communist Party. The French anarchist philosopher and writer Albert Camus wrote an open letter, The Blood of the Hungarians, criticising the West's lack of action. Even Jean-Paul Sartre, still a determined Communist Party member, criticised the Soviets in his article Le Fantôme de Staline, in Situations VII. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1956), L'intellectuel et les communistes français Script error: The function "in_lang" does not exist. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}] Le Web de l'Humanite, 21 June 2005. Retrieved 24 October 2006.
205. ↑ Appadorai, A. (1968). "Recent Socialist Thought in India". The Review of Politics 30 (3): 349–362. doi:10.1017/S0034670500041024.
206. ↑ Dirlik, Arif (2005). The Marxism in the Chinese revolution. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 20. ISBN 978-074253069-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=S-aGLEtx7AYC&pg=PA20.
207. ↑ ((School of Politics and International Relations, University of Southern California, Von KleinSmid Institute of International Affairs)) (1988). Studies in Comparative Communism. 21. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 134. https://books.google.com/books?id=VHnmAAAAMAAJ.
208. ↑ Smil, V. (1999). "China's great famine: 40 years later". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 319 (7225): 1619–1621. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1619. PMID 10600969.
209. ↑ Dikötter, Frank. Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–62. Walker & Company, 2010. p. xii ("at least 45 million people died unnecessarily") p. xiii ("6 to 8 percent of the victims were tortured to death or summarily killed—amounting to at least 2.5 million people.") p. 333 ("a minimum of 45 million excess deaths"). ISBN 0802777686.
210. ↑ "Non-Aligned Movement | Definition, Mission, & Facts" (in en). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Non-Aligned-Movement.
211. ↑ Friedland, William; Rosberg, Carl Jr. (1964). African Socialism. California: Stanford University Press. p. 3.
212. ↑ Raz, Guy (1 January 2009). "Cuba Marks 50 Years Since 'Triumphant Revolution'". NPR. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98937598&t=1633972357243.
213. ↑ "Cuba: Constitución". http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Cuba/vigente.html#mozTocId561012.
214. ↑ Luebbers, Matthias (2009). "Cuba y el Socialismo". El comunismo cubano y su desarrollo dependiente. GRIN Verlag. p. 3. ISBN 9783640336272. https://books.google.com/books?id=9GaUqqsXR7UC. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
215. ↑ Robinson (2018), p. 203: "... a US Embassy official in Jakarta, Robert Martens, had supplied the Indonesian Army with lists containing the names of thousands of PKI officials in the months after the alleged coup attempt. According to the journalist Kathy Kadane, 'As many as 5,000 names were furnished over a period of months to the Army there, and the Americans later checked off the names of those who had been killed or captured.' Despite Martens later denials of any such intent, these actions almost certainly aided in the death or detention of many innocent people. They also sent a powerful message that the US government agreed with and supported the army's campaign against the PKI, even as that campaign took its terrible toll in human lives."; Roosa (2006); Simpson (2010), p. 193: "Washington did everything in its power to encourage and facilitate the army-led massacre of alleged PKI members, and U.S. officials worried only that the killing of the party's unarmed supporters might not go far enough, permitting Sukarno to return to power and frustrate the [Johnson] Administration's emerging plans for a post-Sukarno Indonesia."; Aarons (2007), pp. 80–81; Bevins (2020), pp. 238–240
216. ↑ Farid, Hilmar (2005). "Indonesia's original sin: mass killings and capitalist expansion, 1965–66". Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 6 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/1462394042000326879.
217. ↑ Robinson (2018), p. 177.
218. ↑ Bevins, Vincent (20 October 2017). "What the United States Did in Indonesia". The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/the-indonesia-documents-and-the-us-agenda/543534/.
219. ↑ 219.0 219.1 Carmines, Edward G., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 1997. "Issue Evolution in Postwar American Politics." In Byron Shafer, ed., Present Discontents. NJ:Chatham House Publishers.
220. ↑ Kaufman, Cynthia (2003). Ideas for Action: Relevant Theory for Radical Change. South End Press. p. 275. ISBN 978-0896086937. https://books.google.com/books?id=3nJUwFqRLTwC&pg=PA275.
221. ↑ Gitlin, Todd (2001). "The Left's Lost Universalism". in Melzer, Arthur M.; Weinberger, Jerry; Zinman, M. Richard. Politics at the Turn of the Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 3–26.
222. ↑ Farred, Grant (2000). "Endgame Identity? Mapping the New Left Roots of Identity Politics". New Literary History 31 (4): 627–648. doi:10.1353/nlh.2000.0045.
223. ↑ Coker, Jeffrey W. (2002). Confronting American Labor: The New Left Dilemma. University of Missouri Press.
224. ↑ Pearson, Hugh (1994). The Shadow of the Panther: Huey Newton and the Price of Black Power in America. Perseus Books. p. 152. ISBN 978-0201483413.
225. ↑ Isserman, Maurice (2001). The Other American: The Life of Michael Harrington. Public Affairs. p. 281. ISBN 978-158648-0363. https://archive.org/details/otheramericanlif0000isse/page/281.
226. ↑ "There must be a better distribution of wealth, and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism."Franklin, Robert Michael (1990). Liberating Visions: Human Fulfillment and Social Justice in African-American Thought. Fortress Press. p. 125. ISBN 978-080062392-0.
227. ↑ 227.0 227.1 227.2 Devlin, Kevin. "Western CPs Condemn Invasion, Hail Prague Spring". Blinken Open Society Archives. https://catalog.osaarchivum.org/catalog/osa:08b8f6ba-5995-4e41-9f9c-093e944891d2.
228. ↑ Andrew, Mitrokhin (2005), p. 444
229. ↑ Harvey, David (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0199283279. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/a-brief-history-of-neoliberalism-9780199283279?cc=us&lang=en&.
230. ↑ Richard P. McBrien, Catholicism (HarperCollins, 1994), chapter IV.
231. ↑ "Socialism" at Encyclopedia Britannica Online. "One manifestation of this connection was liberation theology—sometimes characterised as an attempt to marry Marx and Jesus—which emerged among Roman Catholic theologians in Latin America in the 1960s."
232. ↑ "Profile of Salvador Allende". BBC. 8 September 2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3089846.stm.
233. ↑ Buddan, Robert (8 March 2009). "Michael Manley: nation-builder". Jamaica Gleaner. http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20090308/focus/focus4.html.
234. ↑ "Where Would Jamaica Be Without Michael Manley?". 12 August 2012. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120812/focus/focus6.html.
235. ↑ Louis Proyect, Nicaragua, discusses, among other things, the reforms and the degree to which socialism was intended or achieved.
236. ↑ Solá Monserrat, Roser (1989). Agrarian Productive Structure in Nicaragua. pp. 69 and ss.
237. ↑ Louis Proyect, Nicaragua, about 4/5 of the way down.
238. ↑ B. Arrien, Juan. "Literacy in Nicaragua". UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001459/145937e.pdf.
239. ↑ Wood, Elizabeth (2003). Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
240. ↑ "The Constitution (Amendment)". http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend42.htm.
241. ↑ James C. Docherty. Historical dictionary of socialism. The Scarecrow Press Inc. London 1997. pp. 181–182
242. ↑ Webster, Dictionary. "Definition of Eurocommunism". Webster's Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eurocommunism.
243. ↑ Virno, Paolo; Hardt, Michael (2006). Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0816649242. https://books.google.com/books?id=AQumJdO6AgIC&pg=PT254.
244. ↑ Sylvere Lotringer & Christian Marazzi ed. Autonomia: Post-Political Politics], New York: Semiotext(e), 1980, 2007
245. ↑ The Dictionary of Contemporary Politics of South America, Routledge, 1989
246. ↑ Hart-Landsberg, Martin; and Burkett, Paul. "China and Socialism: Market Reforms and Class Struggle". Monthly Review. Retrieved 30 October 2008.
247. ↑ China's Average Economic Growth in 90s Ranked 1st in World. People's Daily. 1 March 2000. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
248. ↑ 248.0 248.1 Stowe, Judy (28 April 1998). "Obituary: Nguyen Van Linh". The Independent (London). p. 20.
249. ↑ 249.0 249.1 Ackland, Len (20 March 1988). "Long after U.S. war, Vietnam is still a mess". St. Petersburg Times (Florida). p. 2-D.
250. ↑ Murray, Geoffrey (1997). Vietnam: Dawn of a New Market. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 24–25. ISBN 031217392X.
251. ↑ Loan, Hoang Thi Bich (18 April 2007). "Consistently pursuing the socialist orientation in developing the market economy in Vietnam". Communist Review (TạpchíCộngsản.org.vn). http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/details_e.asp?Object=29152838&News_ID=18459436.
252. ↑ 252.0 252.1 DaVanzo, Julie; Grammich, Clifford A. (1 January 2001). ﻿Russia's Mortality Crisis: Drinking, Disease, and Deteriorating Health Care﻿ (Report). https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5056.html.
253. ↑ Klein, Naomi (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Picador. pp. 276. ISBN 978-0312427993.
254. ↑ Whyman, Philip; Baimbridge, Mark; Mullen, Andrew (2012). The Political Economy of the European Social Model. Routledge Studies in the European Economy. Routledge. pp. 108. ISBN 978-0415476294. "In short, Gorbachev aimed to lead the Soviet Union towards the Scandinavian social democratic model."
255. ↑ "1990 CIA World Factbook". Central Intelligence Agency. http://www.umsl.edu/services/govdocs/wofact90/world12.txt.
256. ↑ 256.0 256.1 Ray, Michael. "Why Did the Soviet Union Collapse?". https://www.britannica.com/story/why-did-the-soviet-union-collapse.
257. ↑ Parket, Richard (June 1990). "Inside the Collapsing Soviet Economy". The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1990/06/inside-the-collapsing-soviet-economy/303870/. "The peculiar fact is that the Soviet Union produces an enormous abundance of goods. When you look at primary production (in what is still the world's second largest economy), the Soviets come out first globally year after year in things like oil, natural gas, iron ore, and steel.".
258. ↑ Oldfield, J.D. (2000). "Structural economic change and the natural environment in the Russian Federation". Post-Communist Economies 12 (1): 77–90. doi:10.1080/14631370050002684.
259. ↑ Peterson, D. J. (1993). Troubled Lands: The Legacy of Soviet Environmental Destruction (A Rand Research Study). Westview Press. ISBN 978-0813316741. https://archive.org/details/troubledlandsleg00pete. Retrieved 3 April 2016.
260. ↑ Appel, Hilary; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2018). From Triumph to Crisis: Neoliberal Economic Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-1108435055. https://books.google.com/books?id=PHhTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3.
261. ↑ 261.0 261.1 Ghodsee, Kristen; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2021). Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 195–196. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197549230.001.0001. ISBN 978-0197549247. "In the mortality belt of the European former Soviet Union, an aggressive health policy intervention might have prevented tens of thousands of excess deaths, or at least generated a different perception of Western intentions. Instead, Western self-congratulatory triumphalism, the political priority to irreversibly destroy the communist system, and the desire to integrate East European economies into the capitalist world at any cost took precedence."
262. ↑ 262.0 262.1 Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press. pp. 51, 222–223. ISBN 978-0691165028. "Following the dissolution of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and then of the Soviet Union itself in late 1991, exploding poverty drove the surge in income inequality: within three years, the proportion of people living in poverty had tripled to more than a third of Russia's population. By the time of the financial crisis of 1998, their share had grown to almost 60 per cent. Yet over the longer term, rising inequality has been boosted by the decompression of wage incomes, much of it resulting from growing regional variation. Strongly disproportionate income growth in Moscow and in oil-and-gas-rich parts of the country point to the successful capture of rents by those in the highest income-brackets. Wealth concentration at the very top had been made possible by the transfer of state assets to private owners."
263. ↑ Mattei, Clara E. (2022). The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism. University of Chicago Press. pp. 301–302. ISBN 978-0226818399. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo181707138.html. "If, in 1987–1988, 2 percent of the Russian people lived in poverty (i.e., survived on less than $4 a day), by 1993–1995 the number reached 50 percent: in just seven years half the Russian population became destitute."
264. ↑ See:
* Privatisation 'raised death rate'. BBC, 15 January 2009. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
* Rosefielde, Steven (2001). "Premature Deaths: Russia's Radical Economic Transition in Soviet Perspective". Europe-Asia Studies 53 (8): 1159–1176. doi:10.1080/09668130120093174.
* Vlassov, Vasiliy; Vishnevsky, Anatoly (11 April 2017). "Privatisation and mortality in Russia". Public Health (The Lancet) 2 (5): e207–e208. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30071-3. PMID 29253482.
* Azarova, Aytalina; Irdam, Darja; Gugushvili, Alexi; Fazekas, Mihaly (11 April 2017). "The effect of rapid privatisation on mortality in mono-industrial towns in post-Soviet Russia: a retrospective cohort study". Public Health (The Lancet) 2 (5): e231–e238. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30072-5. PMID 28626827.
* Popov, Vladimir (5 June 2018). "Mortality and life expectancy in post-communist countries". https://doc-research.org/2018/06/mortality-life-expectancy-post-communist/.
* "Final Report Summary – PRIVMORT (The Impact of Privatization on the Mortality Crisis in Eastern Europe)". 31 August 2017. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/269036/reporting. "(...) we believe the findings provide strong evidence for the hypothesis that rapid privatisation contributed to elevated levels of working age male mortality."
265. ↑ Ghodsee (2017), pp. 63–64.
266. ↑ Hauck, Owen (2 February 2016). "Average Life Expectancy in Post-Communist Countries—Progress Varies 25 Years after Communism". https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/average-life-expectancy-post-communist-countries-progress-varies-25-years-after.
267. ↑ Gerry, Christopher J.; Raskina, Yulia; Tsyplakova, Daria (November 2018). "Convergence or Divergence? Life Expectancy Patterns in Post-communist Countries, 1959–2010". Social Indicators Research 140 (1): 309–332. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1764-4. PMID 30464360.
268. ↑ Safaei, Jalil (31 August 2011). "Post-Communist Health Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe". Economics Research International 2012: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2012/137412.
269. ↑ Mackenbach, Johan (December 2012). "2008 Political conditions and life expectancy in Europe, 1900-2008". Social Science and Medicine. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234823288.
270. ↑ Dolea, C.; Nolte, E.; McKee, M. (2002). "Changing life expectancy in Romania after the transition". Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 56 (6): 444–449. doi:10.1136/jech.56.6.444. PMID 12011202. PMC 1732171. https://jech.bmj.com/content/56/6/444. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
271. ↑ Chavez, Lesly Allyn (June 2014). "The Effects of Communism on Romania's Population". https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335675821.
272. ↑ Havrylyshyn, Oleh; Meng, Xiaofan; Tupy, Marian L. (12 July 2016). "25 Years of Reforms in Ex-Communist Countries". https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/25-years-reforms-ex-communist-countries-fast-extensive-reforms-led-higher-growth#introduction.
273. ↑ Appel, Hilary; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2018). From Triumph to Crisis: Neoliberal Economic Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge University Press. p. 36. ISBN 978-1108435055. https://books.google.com/books?id=PHhTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36.
274. ↑ Milanović, Branko (2015). "After the Wall Fell: The Poor Balance Sheet of the Transition to Capitalism". Challenge 58 (2): 135–138. doi:10.1080/05775132.2015.1012402. "So, what is the balance sheet of transition? Only three or at most five or six countries could be said to be on the road to becoming a part of the rich and (relatively) stable capitalist world. Many of the other countries are falling behind, and some are so far behind that they cannot aspire to go back to the point where they were when the Wall fell for several decades.".
275. ↑ Ghodsee (2017), pp. xix–xx, 134, 197–200.
276. ↑ Ghodsee & Sehon (2018).
277. ↑ "Confidence in Democracy and Capitalism Wanes in Former Soviet Union". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. 5 December 2011. http://www.pewglobal.org/2011/12/05/confidence-in-democracy-and-capitalism-wanes-in-former-soviet-union/.
278. ↑ "End of the USSR: visualising how the former Soviet countries are doing, 20 years on | Russia | The Guardian". https://amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/aug/17/ussr-soviet-countries-data.
279. ↑ Mitchell, Travis (15 October 2019). "European Public Opinion Three Decades After the Fall of Communism" (in en-US). https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/15/european-public-opinion-three-decades-after-the-fall-of-communism/.
280. ↑ Gerstle, Gary (2022). The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era. Oxford University Press. p. 148. ISBN 978-0197519646. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-neoliberal-order-9780197519646?cc=us&lang=en&. "These parties had themselves once been socialist. But by the 1990s they were increasingly reformist and technocratic in orientation, seen as maintainers of the status quo and no longer able to inspire the masses with dreams of secular emancipation, as parties of the left had been doing for 200 years since the French Revolution."
281. ↑ Teeple, Gary (2000). Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform: Into the Twenty-first Century. University of Toronto Press. p. 47. ISBN 978-155193-0268. http://www.utppublishing.com/Globalization-and-the-Decline-of-Social-Reform-Into-the-Twenty-First-Century.html.
282. ↑ "Socialist International – Progressive Politics for a Fairer World". http://www.socialistinternational.org/4Principles/dofpeng2.html.
283. ↑ Lewis, Jane; Surender, Rebecca (2004). Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way?. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–4, 16.
284. ↑ "All aboard the Third Way". BBC News. 19 March 1999. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/298465.stm.
285. ↑ Tansey, Stephen D.; Jackson, Nigel A. (2008). Politics: the basics (Fourth ed.). Oxon; New York: Routledge. p. 97.
286. ↑ "Labour Party Clause Four". Labour. 30 October 2008. http://www.labour.org.uk/labour_policies.
287. ↑ 287.0 287.1 Sunkara, Bhaskar (1 May 2019). "This May Day, let's hope democratic socialism makes a comeback" (in en-GB). The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/01/this-may-day-lets-hope-democratic-socialism-makes-a-comeback.
288. ↑ Negri, Antonio; Guattari, Felix (1990). Communists Like Us. New York: Semiotext(e). pp. 173. ISBN 978-0936756219. "It is because of this subject with whom we identify that the events of the East pertain to us. Whether Gorbachev mains in power or is removed by Ligachev, whether perestroika succeeds in the present form or in a second wave that will inevitably follow, whether the Russian empire endures or not – these are all problems that concern only the Soviets."
289. ↑ "Basic document | Progressive Alliance". Progressive-alliance.info. http://progressive-alliance.info/basic-document/.
290. ↑ "A Progressive Network for the 21st Century". http://www.spd.de/scalableImageBlob/84620/data/20121217_progressive_alliance_abschlussstatement-data.pdf.
291. ↑ "Why Labour is obsessed with Greek politics". The Economist. 30 June 2018. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/06/30/why-labour-is-obsessed-with-greek-politics.
292. ↑ Henley, Jon. "2017 and the curious demise of Europe's centre-left" (in en-GB). The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2017/dec/29/2017-and-the-curious-demise-of-europes-centre-left.
293. ↑ Younge, Gary (22 May 2017). "Jeremy Corbyn has defied his critics to become Labour's best hope of survival". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/22/jeremy-corbyn-labour-anti-austerity-manifesto.
294. ↑ Lowen, Mark (5 April 2013). "How Greece's once-mighty Pasok party fell from grace". BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22025714.
295. ↑ "Rose thou art sick". The Economist. 2 April 2016. ISSN 0013-0613. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/04/02/rose-thou-art-sick.
296. ↑ Perry, Mark (2016-03-22). "Why Socialism Always Fails" (in en-US). https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/why-socialism-always-fails/.
297. ↑ Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence". Nature Communications 11 (3107): 3107. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMID 32561753. Bibcode: 2020NatCo..11.3107W.
298. ↑ Hickel, Jason et al. (December 12, 2022). "Degrowth can work — here's how science can help". Nature 612 (7940): 400–403. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-04412-x. PMID 36510013. Bibcode: 2022Natur.612..400H.
299. ↑ Andrew Vincent. Modern political ideologies. Wiley-Blackwell publishing. 2010. pp. 87–88
300. ↑ Socialism and the Market: The Socialist Calculation Debate Revisited. Routledge Library of 20th Century Economics, 2000. p. 12. ISBN 978-0415195867.
301. ↑ Claessens, August (2009). The logic of socialism. Kessinger Publishing, LLC. p. 15. ISBN 978-1104238407. "The individual is largely a product of his environment and much of his conduct and behavior is the reflex of getting a living in a particular stage of society."
302. ↑ Ferri, Enrico, "Socialism and Modern Science", in Evolution and Socialism (1912), p. 79. "Upon what point are orthodox political economy and socialism in absolute conflict? Political economy has held and holds that the economic laws governing the production and distribution of wealth which it has established are natural laws ... not in the sense that they are laws naturally determined by the condition of the social organism (which would be correct), but that they are absolute laws, that is to say that they apply to humanity at all times and in all places, and consequently, that they are immutable in their principal points, though they may be subject to modification in details. Scientific socialism holds, the contrary, that the laws established by classical political economy, since the time of Adam Smith, are laws peculiar to the present period in the history of civilized humanity, and that they are, consequently, laws essentially relative to the period of their analysis and discovery."
303. ↑ Russell, Bertrand (1932). "In Praise of Idleness". http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html.
304. ↑ Bhargava. Political Theory: An Introduction. Pearson Education India, 2008. p. 249.
305. ↑ Marx, Karl (1857–1861). "The Grundrisse". http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch14.htm. "The free development of individualities, and hence not the reduction of necessary labour time so as to posit surplus labour, but rather the general reduction of the necessary labour of society to a minimum, which then corresponds to the artistic, scientific etc. development of the individuals in the time set free, and with the means created, for all of them."
306. ↑ 306.0 306.1 "Let's produce for use, not profit". Socialist Party of Great Britain. May 2010. http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/may10/page23.html.
307. ↑ Magdoff, Fred; Yates, Michael D. (November 2009). "What Needs To Be Done: A Socialist View". Monthly Review. http://www.monthlyreview.org/091109magdoff-yates.php. Retrieved 23 February 2014.
308. ↑ Wolff, Richard D. (29 June 2009). "Economic Crisis from a Socialist Perspective | Professor Richard D. Wolff". Rdwolff.com. http://www.rdwolff.com/content/economic-crisis-socialist-perspective.
309. ↑ Warren, Chris (December 2022). "What is capitalism". Australian Socialist 28 (2/3). ISSN 1327-7723. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.818838886883514.
310. ↑ Engels, Friedrich. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch03.htm. Retrieved 30 October 2010. "The bourgeoisie demonstrated to be a superfluous class. All its social functions are now performed by salaried employees."
311. ↑ Horvat (1982), pp. 15–20, 1: Capitalism, The General Pattern of Capitalist Development.
312. ↑ 312.0 312.1 Wishart, Lawrence (1968). Marx and Engels Selected Works. pp. 40. "Capitalist property relations put a "fetter" on the productive forces"
313. ↑ Horvat (1982), p. 197.
314. ↑ Horvat (1982), pp. 197–198.
315. ↑ Schweickart et al. (1998), pp. 60–61.
316. ↑ "Socialism | Definition, History, Types, Examples, & Facts | Britannica". Britannica. 2009. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism. Retrieved 14 October 2009. "Socialists complain that capitalism necessarily leads to unfair and exploitative concentrations of wealth and power in the hands of the relative few who emerge victorious from free-market competition—people who then use their wealth and power to reinforce their dominance in society.".
317. ↑ 317.0 317.1 Marx, Karl (1859). "Preface". A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.
318. ↑ Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2004). "Marx's Theory of Change". Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century. George Hoffman. p. 62. ISBN 0618261818.
319. ↑ Schaff, Kory (2001). Philosophy and the Problems of Work: A Reader. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 224. ISBN 978-07425-07951.
320. ↑ Walicki, Andrzej (1995). Marxism and the leap to the kingdom of freedom: the rise and fall of the Communist utopia. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0804723848.
321. ↑ Berlau (1949), p. 21.
322. ↑ Screpanti, Ernesto; Zamagni, Stefano (2005). An Outline on the History of Economic Thought (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 295. "It should not be forgotten, however, that in the period of the Second International, some of the reformist currents of Marxism, as well as some of the extreme left-wing ones, not to speak of the anarchist groups, had already criticised the view that State ownership and central planning is the best road to socialism. But with the victory of Leninism in Russia, all dissent was silenced, and socialism became identified with 'democratic centralism', 'central planning', and State ownership of the means of production."
323. ↑ Schumpeter, Joseph (2008). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper Perennial. p. 169. ISBN 978-0-06156161-0. "But there are still others (concepts and institutions) which by virtue of their nature cannot stand transplantation and always carry the flavor of a particular institutional framework. It is extremely dangerous, in fact it amounts to a distortion of historical description, to use them beyond the social world or culture whose denizens they are. Now ownership or property—also, so I believe, taxation—are such denizens of the world of commercial society, exactly as knights and fiefs are denizens of the feudal world. But so is the state (a denizen of commercial society)."
324. ↑ "Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism". PBS. https://www.pbs.org/heavenonearth/synopsis.html.
325. ↑ Draper, Hal (1990). Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution, Volume IV: Critique of Other Socialisms. New York: Monthly Review Press. pp. 1–21. ISBN 978-0853457985.
326. ↑ Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto.
327. ↑ Workers Revolutionary Group. "The Leninist Concept of the Revolutionary Vanguard Party". http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/socialistvoice/partyPR46.html.
328. ↑ Schaff, Adam (April–June 1973). "Marxist Theory on Revolution and Violence". Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (2): 263–270. doi:10.2307/2708729.
329. ↑ 329.0 329.1 Parker, Stan (March 2002). "Reformism – or socialism?". Socialist Standard. http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2000s/2002/no-1171-march-2002/reformism-or-socialism.
330. ↑ Hallas, Duncan (January 1973). "Do We Support Reformist Demands?". Controversy: Do We Support Reformist Demands?. International Socialism. http://www.marxists.org/archive/hallas/works/1973/01/reform.htm.
331. ↑ Clifton, Lois (November 2011). "Do we need reform of revolution?". Socialist Review. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/do-we-need-reform-or-revolution.
332. ↑ Bockman (2011), p. 20: "According to nineteenth-century socialist views, socialism would function without capitalist economic categories—such as money, prices, interest, profits and rent—and thus would function according to laws other than those described by current economic science. While some socialists recognised the need for money and prices at least during the transition from capitalism to socialism, socialists more commonly believed that the socialist economy would soon administratively mobilise the economy in physical units without the use of prices or money."
333. ↑ Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2004). "Socialist Economy". Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century (Seventh ed.). George Hoffman. p. 117. ISBN 978-0618261819. "In such a setting, information problems are not serious, and engineers rather than economists can resolve the issue of factor proportions."
334. ↑ O'Hara, Phillip (2003). Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2. Routledge. p. 70. ISBN 978-0415241878. "Market socialism is a general designation for a number of models of economic systems. On the one hand, the market mechanism is utilised to distribute economic output, to organise production and to allocate factor inputs. On the other hand, the economic surplus accrues to society at large rather than to a class of private (capitalist) owners, through some form of collective, public or social ownership of capital."
335. ↑ Stiglitz, Joseph (1996). Whither Socialism?. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262691826. "."
336. ↑ Olson, Jr., Mancur (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press. Description, Table of Contents, and preview.
337. ↑ Roemer, John E. (1985). "Should Marxists be Interested in Exploitation". Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (1): 30–65.
338. ↑ Vrousalis, Nicholas (2023). Exploitation as Domination: What Makes Capitalism Unjust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19286-769-8. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/exploitation-as-domination-9780192867698?cc=us&lang=en&. Retrieved 9 March 2023.
339. ↑ "Excerpt from Commanding Heights". https://www.amazon.com/dp/product-description/068483569X.
340. ↑ "On Milton Friedman, MGR & Annaism". Sangam.org. http://www.sangam.org/taraki/articles/2006/11-25_Friedman_MGR.php?uid=2075.
341. ↑ Bellamy, Richard (2003). The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0521563543. https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory00ball.
342. ↑ Horvat (1982), p. 197: "The sandglass (socialist) model is based on the observation that there are two fundamentally different spheres of activity or decision making. The first is concerned with value judgments, and consequently each individual counts as one in this sphere. In the second, technical decisions are made on the basis of technical competence and expertise. The decisions of the first sphere are policy directives; those of the second, technical directives. The former are based on political authority as exercised by all members of the organisation; the latter, on professional authority specific to each member and growing out of the division of labour. Such an organisation involves a clearly defined coordinating hierarchy but eliminates a power hierarchy."
343. ↑ Horvat (1982), p. 197 "The sandglass (socialist) model is based on the observation that there are two fundamentally different spheres of activity or decision making. The first is concerned with value judgments, and consequently each individual counts as one in this sphere. In the second, technical decisions are made on the basis of technical competence and expertise. The decisions of the first sphere are policy directives; those of the second, technical directives. The former are based on political authority as exercised by all members of the organisation; the latter, on professional authority specific to each member and growing out of the division of labour. Such an organisation involves a clearly defined coordinating hierarchy but eliminates a power hierarchy."
344. ↑ Trotsky, Leon (1936). "4: The Struggle for Productivity of Labor". The Revolution Betrayed. http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1936/revbet/ch04.htm. "Having lost its ability to bring happiness or trample men in the dust, money will turn into mere bookkeeping receipts for the convenience of statisticians and for planning purposes. In the still more distant future, probably these receipts will not be needed."
345. ↑ Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2004). Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century (Seventh ed.). George Hoffman. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-0618261819.
346. ↑ Ericson, Richard E.. "Command Economy". http://econ.la.psu.edu/~bickes/rickcommand.pdf.
347. ↑ Nove (1991), p. 78 "Several authors of the most diverse political views have stated that there is in fact no planning in the Soviet Union: Eugene Zaleski, J. Wilhelm, Hillel Ticktin. They all in their very different ways note the fact that plans are often (usually) unfulfilled, that information flows are distorted, that plan-instructions are the subject of bargaining, that there are many distortions and inconsistencies, indeed that (as many sources attest) plans are frequently altered within the period to which they are supposed to apply ... ."
348. ↑ Trotsky, Leon (1972). Writings of Leon Trotsky, 1932–33. Pathfinder Press. p. 96. ISBN 9780873482288. Trotsky.
349. ↑ Hayek, F. A. (1935). "The Nature and History of the Problem". in Hayek, F. A.. Collectivist Economic Planning. pp. 1–40. , and Hayek, F. A. (1935). "The Present State of the Debate". in Hayek, F. A.. Collectivist Economic Planning. pp. 201–243.
350. ↑ Sinclair (1918).
351. ↑ O'Hara, Phillip (2003). Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2. Routledge. pp. 8–9. ISBN 978-0415241878. "One finds favorable opinions of cooperatives also among other great economists of the past, such as, for example, John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall...In eliminating the domination of capital over labour, firms run by workers eliminate capitalist exploitation and reduce alienation."
352. ↑ 352.0 352.1 "Guild Socialism". Britannica.com. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/248652/Guild-Socialism. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
353. ↑ Vanek, Jaroslav, The Participatory Economy (Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press, 1971).
354. ↑ "CYBERSYN/Cybernetic Synergy". Cybersyn.cl. http://www.cybersyn.cl/ingles/cybersyn/cybernet.html.
355. ↑ Albert, Michael; Hahnel, Robin (1991). The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.
356. ↑ "Participatory Planning Through Negotiated Coordination". http://gesd.free.fr/devine.pdf.
357. ↑ "The Political Economy of Peer Production". CTheory. 12 January 2005. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499.
358. ↑ Mayne, Alan James (1999). From Politics Past to Politics Future: An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 131. ISBN 978-027596151-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=6MkTz6Rq7wUC&pg=PA131.
359. ↑ Anarchism for Know-It-Alls. Filiquarian Publishing. 2008. ISBN 978-1599862187. https://books.google.com/books?id=jeiudz5sBV4C&pg=PA14. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
360. ↑ Dolgoff, S. (1974), The Anarchist Collectives: Workers' Self-Management in the Spanish Revolution, Free Life Editions, ISBN 978-0914156-031
361. ↑ Estrin, Saul (1991). "Yugoslavia: The Case of Self-Managing Market Socialism". Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (4): 187–194. doi:10.1257/jep.5.4.187.
362. ↑ Wollf, Richard (2012). Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism. Haymarket Books. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-1608462476. http://www.democracyatwork.info/. "The disappearances of slaves and masters and lords and serfs would now be replicated by the disappearance of capitalists and workers. Such oppositional categories would no longer apply to the relationships of production, Instead, workers would become their own collective bosses. The two categories—employer and employee—would be integrated in the same individuals."
363. ↑ Wollf, Richard (24 June 2012). "Yes, there is an alternative to capitalism: Mondragon shows the way". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/24/alternative-capitalism-mondragon.
364. ↑ Beckett (2007).
365. ↑ The Strike Weapon: Lessons of the Miners' Strike. London: Socialist Party of Great Britain. 1985. http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pdf/ms.pdf. Retrieved 28 April 2007.
366. ↑ Hardcastle, Edgar (1947). "The Nationalisation of the Railways". Socialist Standard 43 (1). http://www.marxists.org/archive/hardcastle/1947/02/railways.htm. Retrieved 28 April 2007.
367. ↑ Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2003). "Marx's Theory of Change". Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century. George Hoffman. p. 142. ISBN 0618261818. "It is an economic system that combines social ownership of capital with market allocation of capital...The state owns the means of production, and returns accrue to society at large."
368. ↑ Bockman (2011), p. 21 "For Walras, socialism would provide the necessary institutions for free competition and social justice. Socialism, in Walras's view, entailed state ownership of land and natural resources and the abolition of income taxes. As owner of land and natural resources, the state could then lease these resources to many individuals and groups, which would eliminate monopolies and thus enable free competition. The leasing of land and natural resources would also provide enough state revenue to make income taxes unnecessary, allowing a worker to invest his savings and become 'an owner or capitalist at the same time that he remains a worker."
369. ↑ Estrin, Saul (1991). "Yugoslavia: The Case of Self-Managing Market Socialism". Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (4): 187–194. doi:10.1257/jep.5.4.187.
370. ↑ Golan, Galia (1971). Reform Rule in Czechoslovakia: The Dubcek Era 1968–1969. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521085861.
371. ↑ "Introduction". Mutualist.org. http://www.mutualist.org/.
372. ↑ Miller, David (1987). "Mutualism". The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Blackwell Publishing. p. 11.
373. ↑ Tandy, Francis D. (1896). "6, paragraph 15". Voluntary Socialism.
374. ↑ "China names key industries for absolute state control". 19 December 2006. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-12/19/content_762056.htm.
375. ↑ "China has socialist market economy in place". People's Daily Online. 13 July 2005. http://english.people.com.cn/200507/13/eng20050713_195876.html.
376. ↑ "China and the OECD". May 2006. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/3/36174313.pdf.
377. ↑ Talent, Jim. "10 China Myths for the New Decade | The Heritage Foundation". Heritage.org. http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/01/10-China-Myths-for-the-New-Decade#_ftn23.
378. ↑ "Reassessing China's State-Owned Enterprises". Forbes. 8 July 2008. https://www.forbes.com/2008/07/08/china-enterprises-state-lead-cx_jrw_0708mckinsey.html.
379. ↑ "InfoViewer: China's champions: Why state ownership is no longer proving a dead hand". Us.ft.com. 28 August 2003. http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto031620081407384075.
380. ↑ "Today's State-Owned Enterprises of China". http://ufirc.ou.edu/publications/Enterprises of China.pdf.
381. ↑ "China grows faster amid worries". BBC News. 16 July 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8153138.stm.
382. ↑ "VN Embassy: Socialist-oriented market economy: concept and development soluti". Vietnamembassy-usa.org. 17 November 2003. http://www.vietnamembassy-usa.org/news/story.php?d=20031117235404.
383. ↑ Lamb & Docherty (2006), pp. 1–3.
384. ↑ 384.0 384.1 Lamb & Docherty (2006), pp. 1–2.
385. ↑ 385.0 385.1 Lamb & Docherty (2006), p. 2.
386. ↑ Woodcock, George. "Anarchism". The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "Anarchism, a social philosophy that rejects authoritarian government and maintains that voluntary institutions are best suited to express man's natural social tendencies.".
387. ↑ "In a society developed on these lines, the voluntary associations which already now begin to cover all the fields of human activity would take a still greater extension so as to substitute themselves for the state in all its functions." Peter Kropotkin. "Anarchism" from the Encyclopædia Britannica Peter Kropotkin. "Anarchism" from the Encyclopædia Britannica]
388. ↑ "Anarchism". The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. 2005. pp. 14. "Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable.".
389. ↑ Sheehan, Sean (2004). Anarchism. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.. pp. 85.
390. ↑ 390.0 390.1 "IAF principles". International of Anarchist Federations. http://www.iaf-ifa.org/principles/english.html. "The IAF – IFA fights for : the abolition of all forms of authority whether economical, political, social, religious, cultural or sexual."
391. ↑ Suissa, Judith (2006). Anarchism and Education: a Philosophical Perspective. New York: Routledge. pp. 7. "as many anarchists have stressed, it is not government as such that they find objectionable, but the hierarchical forms of government associated with the nation state."
392. ↑ Kropotkin, Peter. Anarchism: its philosophy and ideal. http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Petr_Kropotkin__Anarchism__its_philosophy_and_ideal.html. "That is why Anarchy, when it works to destroy authority in all its aspects, when it demands the abrogation of laws and the abolition of the mechanism that serves to impose them, when it refuses all hierarchical organisation and preaches free agreement—at the same time strives to maintain and enlarge the precious kernel of social customs without which no human or animal society can exist."
393. ↑ "B.1 Why are anarchists against authority and hierarchy?". An Anarchist FAQ. http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/The_Anarchist_FAQ_Editorial_Collective__An_Anarchist_FAQ__03_17_.html#toc2. "anarchists are opposed to irrational (e.g., illegitimate) authority, in other words, hierarchy—hierarchy being the institutionalisation of authority within a society."
394. ↑ Malatesta, Errico. "Towards Anarchism". Man!. OCLC 3930443. http://www.marxists.org/archive/malatesta/1930s/xx/toanarchy.htm. Agrell, Siri (14 May 2007). "Working for The Man". The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070514.wxlanarchist14/BNStory/lifeWork/home/. Retrieved 14 April 2008. "Anarchism". Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service. 2006. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9117285. "Anarchism". The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: 14. 2005. "Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable.". The following sources cite anarchism as a political philosophy: McLaughlin (2007), p. 59; Johnston, R. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. p. 24. ISBN 978-0631205616.
395. ↑ Slevin, Carl (2003). "Anarchism". in McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair. Anarchism. Oxford University Press.
396. ↑ McLaughlin (2007), p. 28"Anarchists do reject the state, as we will see. But to claim that this central aspect of anarchism is definitive is to sell anarchism short."
397. ↑ Brown, L. Susan (2002). "Anarchism as a Political Philosophy of Existential Individualism: Implications for Feminism". The Politics of Individualism: Liberalism, Liberal Feminism and Anarchism. Black Rose Books Ltd. Publishing. p. 106.
398. ↑ 398.0 398.1 McLaughlin (2007), p. 1"Authority is defined in terms of the right to exercise social control (as explored in the "sociology of power") and the correlative duty to obey (as explored in the "philosophy of practical reason"). Anarchism is distinguished, philosophically, by its scepticism towards such moral relations—by its questioning of the claims made for such normative power—and, practically, by its challenge to those "authoritative" powers which cannot justify their claims and which are therefore deemed illegitimate or without moral foundation."
399. ↑ Individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker defined anarchism as opposition to authority as follows "They found that they must turn either to the right or to the left,—follow either the path of Authority or the path of Liberty. Marx went one way; Warren and Proudhon the other. Thus were born State Socialism and Anarchism ... Authority, takes many shapes, but, broadly speaking, her enemies divide themselves into three classes: first, those who abhor her both as a means and as an end of progress, opposing her openly, avowedly, sincerely, consistently, universally; second, those who profess to believe in her as a means of progress, but who accept her only so far as they think she will subserve their own selfish interests, denying her and her blessings to the rest of the world; third, those who distrust her as a means of progress, believing in her only as an end to be obtained by first trampling upon, violating, and outraging her. These three phases of opposition to Liberty are met in almost every sphere of thought and human activity. Good representatives of the first are seen in the Catholic Church and the Russian autocracy; of the second, in the Protestant Church and the Manchester school of politics and political economy; of the third, in the atheism of Gambetta and the socialism of Karl Marx." Benjamin Tucker. Individual Liberty.
400. ↑ Anarchist historian George Woodcock report of Mikhail Bakunin's anti-authoritarianism and shows opposition to both state and non-state forms of authority as follows: "All anarchists deny authority; many of them fight against it." (p. 9) ... Bakunin did not convert the League's central committee to his full program, but he did persuade them to accept a remarkably radical recommendation to the Bern Congress of September 1868, demanding economic equality and implicitly attacking authority in both Church and State."
401. ↑ 401.0 401.1 McKay, Iain, ed (2008). An Anarchist FAQ. I. Stirling: AK Press. ISBN 978-1902593906. OCLC 182529204.
402. ↑ Hahnel, Robin (2005). Economic Justice and Democracy. Routledge Press. p. 138. ISBN 0415933447.
403. ↑ Lesigne (1887). "Socialistic Letters" . Le Radical. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
404. ↑ Tucker, Benjamin (1911) [1888]. State Socialism and Anarchism: How Far They Agree and Wherein They Differ. Fifield.
405. ↑ Tucker, Benjamin (1893). Instead of a Book by a Man Too Busy to Write One. pp. 363–364.
406. ↑ Brown, Susan Love (1997). "The Free Market as Salvation from Government". In Carrier, James G., ed. Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture. Berg Publishers. p. 107. ISBN 978-1859731499.
407. ↑ Marshall, Peter (1992). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: HarperCollins. p. 641. ISBN 978-0002178556.
408. ↑ Franklin, Robert Michael (1990). Liberating Visions: Human Fulfillment and Social Justice in African-American Thought. Fortress Press. p. 125. ISBN 978-0800623920.
409. ↑ Osagyefo Uhuru Sekou (20 January 2014). The radical gospel of Martin Luther King. Al Jazeera America. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
410. ↑ This definition is captured in this statement by Anthony Crosland, who "argued that the socialisms of the pre-war world (not just that of the Marxists, but of the democratic socialists too) were now increasingly irrelevant". Pierson, Chris (June 2005). "Lost property: What the Third Way lacks". Journal of Political Ideologies 10 (2): 145–63. doi:10.1080/13569310500097265. Other texts which use the terms democratic socialism in this way include Malcolm Hamilton Democratic Socialism in Britain and Sweden (St Martin's Press 1989).
411. ↑ Pierson, Christopher (1995). Socialism After Communism: The New Market Socialism. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0271014791.
412. ↑ Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (1999). Contemporary Political Ideologies (2nd ed.). London: Continuum. pp. 80–103. ISBN 978-1855676053.
413. ↑ Newman (2005), p. 5.
414. ↑ Raza, Syed Ali. Social Democratic System. Global Peace Trust. p. 86. ISBN 978-9699757006. https://books.google.com/books?id=q07jeo_wrk4C&pg=PA86.
415. ↑ O'Reilly, David (2007). The New Progressive Dilemma: Australia and Tony Blair's Legacy. Springer. p. 91. ISBN 978-0230625471. https://books.google.com/books?id=Ai2BDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91.
416. ↑ Gage, Beverly (17 July 2018). "America Can Never Sort Out Whether 'Socialism' Is Marginal or Rising". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/magazine/america-can-never-sort-out-whether-socialism-is-marginal-or-rising.html.
417. ↑ Brandal, Bratberg & Thorsen (2013), p. 7.
418. ↑ 418.0 418.1 Busky (2000), p. 8.
419. ↑ Sejersted, Francis (2011). The age of social democracy: Norway and Sweden in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691147741. OCLC 762965992.
420. ↑ Foundations of social democracy, 2004. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, p. 8, November 2009.
421. ↑ Mander, Jerry (2012). The Capitalism Papers: Fatal Flaws of an Obsolete System. Counterpoint. pp. 213–217. ISBN 978-1582437170. https://archive.org/details/capitalismpapers0000mand/page/213.
422. ↑ Eskow, Richard (15 October 2014). "New Study Finds Big Government Makes People Happy, "Free Markets" Don't". https://ourfuture.org/20141015/new-study-finds-big-government-makes-people-happy-free-markets-dont.
423. ↑ Radcliff, Benjamin (25 September 2013). "Opinion: Social safety net makes people happier". https://www.cnn.com/2013/09/25/opinion/radcliff-politics-of-happiness/index.html.
424. ↑ "World's Happiest Countries? Social Democracies". https://www.commondreams.org/further/2009/05/11/worlds-happiest-countries-social-democracies.
425. ↑ Sullivan, Dylan; Hickel, Jason (2023). "Capitalism and extreme poverty: A global analysis of real wages, human height, and mortality since the long 16th century". World Development 161: 106026. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106026. "...amongst the developed capitalist countries, the social democracies with generous welfare states (i.e., Scandinavia) have superior health outcomes to neo-liberal states like the US. Poverty alleviation and gains in human health have historically been linked to socialist political movements and public action, not to capitalism.".
426. ↑ "Social democracy". Britannica.com. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551073/social-democracy. Retrieved 12 October 2013.
427. ↑ Newman (2005), p. 74.
428. ↑ 428.0 428.1 Meyer (2013), p. 91.
429. ↑ Colby, Ira Christopher (2013). Dulmus, Catherine N.; Sowers, Karen M.. eds. Connecting social welfare policy to fields of practice. John Wiley & Sons. p. 29. ISBN 978-1118177006. OCLC 827894277.
430. ↑ Meyer (2013), p. 137.
431. ↑ Upchurch, Martin (2016). The crisis of social democratic trade unionism in Western Europe: the search for alternatives. Routledge. p. 51. ISBN 978-1315615141. OCLC 948604973.
432. ↑ Berman, Sheri (2006). The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. p. 153. ISBN 978-0521817998.
433. ↑ Schweickart, David (2006). "Democratic Socialism". http://orion.it.luc.edu/~dschwei/demsoc.htm. "Social democrats supported and tried to strengthen the basic institutions of the welfare state—pensions for all, public health care, public education, unemployment insurance. They supported and tried to strengthen the labour movement. The latter, as socialists, argued that capitalism could never be sufficiently humanised, and that trying to suppress the economic contradictions in one area would only see them emerge in a different guise elsewhere. (E.g., if you push unemployment too low, you'll get inflation; if job security is too strong, labour discipline breaks down; etc.)"
434. ↑ Thompson (2006), pp. 52, 58–59.
435. ↑ Orlow (2000), p. 190; Tansey & Jackson (2008), p. 97.
436. ↑ 436.0 436.1 Gaus & Kukathas (2004), p. 420.
437. ↑ Adams, Ian (1998). Ideology and Politics in Britain Today. Manchester University Press. p. 127. ISBN 978-0719050565. https://books.google.com/books?id=_7t714alm68C&pg=PA127.
438. ↑ Pugliese, Stanislao G. (1999). Carlo Rosselli: socialist heretic and antifascist exile. Harvard University Press. p. 99. OCLC 1029276342.
439. ↑ Thompson, Noel W. (2006). Political economy and the Labour Party: the economics of democratic socialism 1884–2005. Routledge. pp. 60–61. OCLC 300363066.
440. ↑ Bartlett, Roland W. (1970). The success of modern private enterprise. The Interstate Printers and Publishers. p. 32. OCLC 878037469. "Liberal socialism, for example, is unequivocally in favour of the free market economy and of freedom of action for the individual and recognises in legalistic and artificial monopolies the real evils of capitalism."
441. ↑ 441.0 441.1 441.2 Bastow, Steve (2003). Third way discourse: European ideologies in the twentieth century. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0748615601. OCLC 899035345.
442. ↑ Urbinati, Nadia; Zakaras, Alex (2007). J.S. Mill's political thought: a bicentennial reassessment. Cambridge University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-0511274725. OCLC 252535635.
443. ↑ "Definition of Blanquism". WisdomSupreme.com. http://www.wisdomsupreme.com/dictionary/blanquism.php.
444. ↑ "entry for Blanquism". http://www.newyouth.com/archives/theory/glossary/b.html#Blanquism.
445. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1917). "The Vulgarisation of Marxism by Opportunists". The State and Revolution. http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch06.htm#s2.
446. ↑ Rosa Luxemburg as part of a longer section on Blanquism in her Organizational Questions of the Russian Social Democracy (later published as Leninism or Marxism?), writes: "For Lenin, the difference between the Social democracy and Blanquism is reduced to the observation that in place of a handful of conspirators we have a class-conscious proletariat. He forgets that this difference implies a complete revision of our ideas on organisation and, therefore, an entirely different conception of centralism and the relations existing between the party and the struggle itself. Blanquism did not count on the direct action of the working class. It, therefore, did not need to organise the people for the revolution. The people were expected to play their part only at the moment of revolution. Preparation for the revolution concerned only the little group of revolutionists armed for the coup. Indeed, to assure the success of the revolutionary conspiracy, it was considered wiser to keep the mass at some distance from the conspirators. Rosa Luxemburg, Leninism or Marxism? , Marx.org , last retrieved 25 April 2007
447. ↑ Marxism–Leninism. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company.
448. ↑ Draper, Hal (1970). Two Souls of Socialism (revised ed.). Highland Park, Michigan: International Socialists. http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/contemp/pamsetc/twosouls/twosouls.htm. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
449. ↑ Young, James D. (1988). Socialism Since 1889: A Biographical History. Totowa: Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 978-0389208136.
450. ↑ Young, James D. (1988). Socialism Since 1889: A Biographical History. Totowa: Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 978-0389208136.
451. ↑ Draper, Hal (1970). Two Souls of Socialism (revised ed.). Highland Park, Michigan: International Socialists. http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/contemp/pamsetc/twosouls/twosouls.htm. Retrieved 20 January 2016. "We have mentioned several cases of this conviction that socialism is the business of a new ruling minority, non-capitalist in nature and therefore guaranteed pure, imposing its own domination either temporarily (for a mere historical era) or even permanently. In either case, this new ruling class is likely to see its goal as an Education Dictatorship over the masses—to Do Them Good, of course—the dictatorship being exercised by an elite party which suppresses all control from below, or by benevolent despots or Savior-Leaders of some kind, or by Shaw's "Supermen," by eugenic manipulators, by Proudhon's "anarchist" managers or Saint-Simon's technocrats or their more modern equivalents—with up-to-date terms and new verbal screens which can be hailed as fresh social theory as against "nineteenth-century Marxism."
452. ↑ Lipow, Arthur (1991). Authoritarian Socialism in America: Edward Bellamy and the Nationalist Movement. University of California Press. pp. 1. ISBN 978-0520075436.
453. ↑ "150 years of Libertarian". http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/The_Anarchist_FAQ_Editorial_Collective__150_years_of_Libertarian.html.
454. ↑ Joseph Déjacque, De l'être-humain mâle et femelle – Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque (in French)
455. ↑ Bookchin, Murray; Biehl, Janet (1997). The Murray Bookchin Reader. Cassell. p. 170. ISBN 0304338737.
456. ↑ Hicks, Steven V.; Shannon, Daniel E. (2003). The American journal of economics and sociology. Blackwell Publishing. p. 612.
457. ↑ Ostergaard, Geoffrey (1991). "Anarchism". Anarchism. Blackwell Publishing. p. 21.
458. ↑ Chomsky, Noam (2004). Language and Politics. In Otero, Carlos Peregrín. AK Press. p. 739
459. ↑ Miller, Wilbur R. (2012). The social history of crime and punishment in America. An encyclopedia. 5 vols. London: SAGE Publications. p. 1007. ISBN 1412988764. "There exist three major camps in libertarian thought: right-libertarianism, socialist libertarianism, and ..."
460. ↑ "It implies a classless and anti-authoritarian (i.e. libertarian) society in which people manage their own affairs" I.1 Isn't libertarian socialism an oxymoron? at An Anarchist FAQ
461. ↑ "unlike other socialists, they tend to see (to various different degrees, depending on the thinker) to be skeptical of centralised state intervention as the solution to capitalist exploitation..." Roderick T. Long. "Toward a libertarian theory of class." Social Philosophy and Policy. Volume 15. Issue 02. Summer 1998. Pg. 305
462. ↑ "Therefore, rather than being an oxymoron, "libertarian socialism" indicates that true socialism must be libertarian and that a libertarian who is not a socialist is a phoney. As true socialists oppose wage labour, they must also oppose the state for the same reasons. Similarly, libertarians must oppose wage labour for the same reasons they must oppose the state." "I1. Isn't libertarian socialism an oxymoron". . In An Anarchist FAQ.
463. ↑ 463.0 463.1 "So, libertarian socialism rejects the idea of state ownership and control of the economy, along with the state as such. Through workers' self-management it proposes to bring an end to authority, exploitation, and hierarchy in production." "I1. Isn't libertarian socialism an oxymoron" in An Anarchist FAQ
464. ↑ " ...preferring a system of popular self governance via networks of decentralized, local voluntary, participatory, cooperative associations. Roderick T. Long. "Toward a libertarian theory of class." Social Philosophy and Policy. Volume 15. Issue 02. Summer 1998. Pg. 305
465. ↑ Mendes, Silva. Socialismo Libertário ou Anarchismo Vol. 1 (1896): "Society should be free through mankind's spontaneous federative affiliation to life, based on the community of land and tools of the trade; meaning: Anarchy will be equality by abolition of private property (while retaining respect for personal property) and liberty by abolition of authority".
466. ↑ "...preferring a system of popular self governance via networks of decentralized, local, voluntary, participatory, cooperative associations-sometimes as a complement to and check on state power..."
467. ↑ Rocker, Rudolf (2004). Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory and Practice. AK Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-1902593920.
468. ↑ Leval, Gaston (1959). "Libertarian Socialism: A Practical Outline". Libcom.org. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
469. ↑ Long, Roderick T. (Summer 1998). "Toward a libertarian theory of class". Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (2): 305. doi:10.1017/S0265052500002028. "LibSoc share with LibCap an aversion to any interference to freedom of thought, expression or choice of lifestyle.".
470. ↑ "What is implied by the term 'libertarian socialism'?: The idea that socialism is first and foremost about freedom and therefore about overcoming the domination, repression, and alienation that block the free flow of human creativity, thought, and action...An approach to socialism that incorporates cultural revolution, women's and children's liberation, and the critique and transformation of daily life, as well as the more traditional concerns of socialist politics. A politics that is completely revolutionary because it seeks to transform all of reality. We do not think that capturing the economy and the state lead automatically to the transformation of the rest of social being, nor do we equate liberation with changing our life-styles and our heads. Capitalism is a total system that invades all areas of life: socialism must be the overcoming of capitalist reality in its entirety, or it is nothing." "What is Libertarian Socialism?" by Ulli Diemer. Volume 2, Number 1 (Summer 1997 issue) of The Red Menace.
471. ↑ Goldman, Emma. "What it Really Stands for Anarchy". Anarchism and Other Essays. "Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations."
472. ↑ "The Soviet Union Versus Socialism". http://chomsky.info/1986____/. "Libertarian socialism, furthermore, does not limit its aims to democratic control by producers over production, but seeks to abolish all forms of domination and hierarchy in every aspect of social and personal life, an unending struggle, since progress in achieving a more just society will lead to new insight and understanding of forms of oppression that may be concealed in traditional practice and consciousness."
473. ↑ O'Neil, John (1998). The Market: Ethics, knowledge and politics. Routledge. p. 3. "It is forgotten that the early defenders of commercial society like [Adam] Smith were as much concerned with criticising the associational blocks to mobile labour represented by guilds as they were to the activities of the state. The history of socialist thought includes a long associational and anti-statist tradition prior to the political victory of the Bolshevism in the east and varieties of Fabianism in the west."
474. ↑ "(Benjamin) Tucker referred to himself many times as a socialist and considered his philosophy to be "Anarchistic socialism." An Anarchist FAQ by Various Authors
475. ↑ French individualist anarchist Émile Armand shows clearly opposition to capitalism and centralised economies when he said that the individualist anarchist "inwardly he remains refractory—fatally refractory—morally, intellectually, economically (The capitalist economy and the directed economy, the speculators and the fabricators of single are equally repugnant to him.)""Anarchist Individualism as a Life and Activity" by Emile Armand
476. ↑ Anarchist Peter Sabatini reports that in the United States "of early to mid-19th century, there appeared an array of communal and "utopian" counterculture groups (including the so-called free love movement). William Godwin's anarchism exerted an ideological influence on some of this, but more so the socialism of Robert Owen and Charles Fourier. After success of his British venture, Owen himself established a cooperative community within the United States at New Harmony, Indiana during 1825. One member of this commune was Josiah Warren (1798–1874), considered to be the first individualist anarchist"Peter Sabatini. "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy"
477. ↑ "A.4. Are Mutalists Socialists?". http://www.mutualist.org/id32.html.
478. ↑ Bookchin, Murray. Ghost of Anarcho-Syndicalism.
479. ↑ Graham, Robert. The General Idea of Proudhon's Revolution.
480. ↑ Kent Bromley, in his preface to Peter Kropotkin's book The Conquest of Bread, considered early French utopian socialist Charles Fourier to be the founder of the libertarian branch of socialist thought, as opposed to the authoritarian socialist ideas of [François-Noël] Babeuf and [Philippe] Buonarroti." Kropotkin, Peter. The Conquest of Bread, preface by Kent Bromley, New York and London, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1906.
481. ↑ Leech, Kenneth (2000). "Socialism". in Hastings, Adrian; Mason, Alistair; Pyper, Hugh. The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 676–678. ISBN 978-0-19-860024-4. https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hast. Retrieved 8 August 2018.
482. ↑ Reid, Donald M. (1974). "The Syrian Christians and Early Socialism in the Arab World". International Journal of Middle East Studies 5 (2): 177–193. doi:10.1017/S0020743800027811.
483. ↑ Paracha, Nadeem F. (21 February 2013). "Islamic Socialism: A history from left to right". https://www.dawn.com/news/787645/islamic-socialism-a-history-from-left-to-right.
484. ↑ "What is Socialist Feminism? – The Feminist eZine". http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/modern/Socialist-Feminism.html.
485. ↑ "Acknowledgments". Journal of Homosexuality 45 (2–4): xxvii–xxviii. 23 September 2003. doi:10.1300/j082v45n02_a. ISSN 0091-8369.
486. ↑ Stokes, John (2000). Eleanor Marx (1855–1898): Life, Work, Contacts. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0754601135.
487. ↑ "Clara Zetkin: On a Bourgeois Feminist Petition". https://www.marxists.org/archive/draper/1976/women/3-zetkin.html.
488. ↑ "Clara Zetkin: Lenin on the Women's Question". https://www.marxists.org/archive/zetkin/1920/lenin/zetkin1.htm.
489. ↑ "The Social Basis of the Woman Question by Alexandra Kollontai 1909". https://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/1909/social-basis.htm.
490. ↑ "Women Workers Struggle For Their Rights by Alexandra Kollontai 1919". https://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/1919/women-workers/ch01.htm.
491. ↑ Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne, ed (2012). Quiet rumours: an anarcha-feminist reader. AK Press/Dark Star. p. 9. ISBN 978-1849351034. OCLC 835894204.
492. ↑ Ackelsberg, Martha A. (2005). Free Women of Spain: Anarchism and the Struggle for the Emancipation of Women. AK Press. ISBN 1902593960. OCLC 884001264.
493. ↑ Davenport, Sue; Strobel, Margaret (1999). "The Chicago Women's Liberation Union: An Introduction". University of Illinois. http://www.uic.edu/orgs/cwluherstory/CWLUAbout/abdoc1.html.
494. ↑ Desbazeille, Michèle Madonna (1990). "Le Nouveau Monde amoureux de Charles Fourier: une écriture passionnée de la rencontre" (in fr). Romantisme 20 (68): 97–110. doi:10.3406/roman.1990.6129. ISSN 0048-8593.
495. ↑ Fourier, Charles (1967) (in fr). Le Nouveau Monde amoureux. Paris: Éditions Anthropos. pp. 389, 391, 429, 458, 459, 462, and 463.
496. ↑ McKenna, Neil (2009). The Secret Life of Oscar Wilde. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0786734924. https://books.google.com/books?id=giD2qu4C-sUC. According to McKenna, Wilde was part of a secret organisation that aimed to legalise homosexuality, and was known among the group as a leader of "the Cause".
497. ↑ Flood, Michael (2013). International encyclopedia of men and masculinities. Routledge. p. 315. ISBN 978-0415864541. OCLC 897581763.
498. ↑ Russell, Paul (2002). The Gay 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Gay Men and Lesbians, Past and Present. Kensington Publishing Corporation. p. 124. ISBN 978-0758201003. https://books.google.com/books?id=jACXalmJ3nEC&pg=PA124.
499. ↑ "Mattachine Society at Dynes, Wayne R. (ed.)". http://williamapercy.com/wiki/images/Mattachine.pdf.
500. ↑ Gay movement boosted by '79 march on Washington , Lou Chabarro 2004 for the Washington Blade.
501. ↑ "Gay Liberation Front: Manifesto. London". 1978. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/glf-london.html.
502. ↑ Kovel, J.; Löwy, M. (2001). An ecosocialist manifesto. http://environment-ecology.com/political-ecology/436-an-ecosocialist-manifesto.html.
503. ↑ Eckersley, Robyn (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0791410134. https://books.google.com/books?id=KLr7Y-mQiRQC.
504. ↑ Clark, John P. (1984). The Anarchist Moment: Reflections on Culture, Nature, and Power. Black Rose Books. ISBN 978-0920057087. https://books.google.com/books?id=hcIgAQAAIAAJ.
505. ↑ Benton, Ted (1996). The greening of Marxism. The Guilford Press. ISBN 1572301198. OCLC 468837567.
506. ↑ Kovel, Joel (2013). The Enemy of Nature: the End of Capitalism or the End of the World?. Zed Books. ISBN 978-1848136595. OCLC 960164995.
507. ↑ Marx, Karl (1981). Capital: a critique of political economy. 3. Penguin in association with New Left Review. ISBN 0140221166. OCLC 24235898.
508. ↑ Wall, Derek (2010). The no-nonsense guide to green politics. New Internationalist. ISBN 978-1906523589. OCLC 776590485.
509. ↑ "Green Left". http://www.greenleft.org.uk.
510. ↑ Diez, Xavier (26 May 2006). "La Insumisión voluntaria. El Anarquismo individualista Español durante la Dictadura i la Segunda República (1923–1938)" (in es). http://www.acracia.org/xdiez.html. "Su obra más representativa es Walden, aparecida en 1854, aunque redactada entre 1845 y 1847, cuando Thoreau decide instalarse en el aislamiento de una cabaña en el bosque, y vivir en íntimo contacto con la naturaleza, en una vida de soledad y sobriedad. De esta experiencia, su filosofía trata de transmitirnos la idea que resulta necesario un retorno respetuoso a la naturaleza, y que la felicidad es sobre todo fruto de la riqueza interior y de la armonía de los individuos con el entorno natural. Muchos han visto en Thoreau a uno de los precursores del ecologismo y del anarquismo primitivista representado en la actualidad por John Zerzan. Para George Woodcock, esta actitud puede estar también motivada por una cierta idea de resistencia al progreso y de rechazo al materialismo creciente que caracteriza la sociedad norteamericana de mediados de siglo XIX."
511. ↑ "Naturists: The first naturists & the naturist culture – Natustar". http://www.natustar.com/uk/naturism-begin.html.
512. ↑ "A.3 What types of anarchism are there?". http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secA3.html#seca33.
513. ↑ "R.A. Forum > SHAFFER, Kirwin R. Anarchism and countercultural politics in early twentieth-century Cuba". http://raforum.info/spip.php?article3061&lang=fr.
514. ↑ "La Insumisión voluntaria. El Anarquismo individualista Español durante la Dictadura i la Segunda República (1923–1938) by Xavier Diez" (in es). http://www.acracia.org/xdiez.html.
515. ↑ Biehl, Janet. "A Short Biography of Murray Bookchin by Janet Biehl". Dwardmac.pitzer.edu. http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bookchin/bio1.html.
516. ↑ Bookchin, Murray (16 June 2004). "Ecology and Revolution". Dwardmac.pitzer.edu. http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bookchin/ecologyandrev.html.
517. ↑ Commoner, Barry (2020). The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. Courier Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0486846248. OCLC 1141422712.
518. ↑ Mellor, Mary (1992). Breaking the boundaries: towards a feminist green socialism. Virago Press. ISBN 1853812005. OCLC 728578769.
519. ↑ Salleh, Ariel (2017). Ecofeminism as politics: nature, Marx and the postmodern. Zed Books. ISBN 978-1786990976. OCLC 951936453.
520. ↑ Guha, Ramachandra (2013). Varieties of Environmentalism Essays North and South. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1134173341. OCLC 964049036.
521. ↑ Pepper, David (2002). Eco-Socialism. doi:10.4324/9780203423363. ISBN 978-0203423363.
522. ↑ Dolgoff, Sam (1974). The Anarchist Collectives Workers' Self-management in the Spanish Revolution 1936–1939 (1st ed.). Free Life Editions.
523. ↑ Hargis, Mike (2002). "No Human Being is Illegal: International Workers' Association Conference on Immigration". Anarcho-Syndicalist Review (33): 10.
524. ↑ "The value of socialism: Global IPSOS poll (2018)". https://www.ipsos.com/en-za/value-socialism-global-ipsos-poll.
525. ↑ Stancil, Kenny (26 June 2021). "Socialism Is Gaining Popularity, Poll Shows". https://truthout.org/articles/socialism-is-gaining-popularity-poll-shows/.
526. ↑ "IPSOS - Global Socialism Survey 2018". https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-05/global_socialism_survey-ipsos.pdf.
527. ↑ 67 per cent of young Brits want a socialist economic system, finds new poll. https://iea.org.uk/media/67-per-cent-of-young-brits-want-a-socialist-economic-system-finds-new-poll/.
528. ↑ "Axios|SurveyMonkey Poll: Capitalism and Socialism (2021)". https://uk.surveymonkey.com/curiosity/axios-capitalism-update/.
529. ↑ "Four in 10 Canadians prefer socialism but not higher taxes to pay for it: op-ed" (in en). 23 February 2023. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/four-in-10-canadians-prefer-socialism-but-not-higher-taxes-to-pay-for-it.
530. ↑ Wright, Erik Olin (15 January 2012). "Toward a Social Socialism" (in en-US). https://thepointmag.com/politics/toward-a-social-socialism/.
531. ↑ Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E., eds (1987). "Socialist Calculation Debate". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 685–692. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1570. ISBN 9781349951215. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2070-1. Retrieved 2 February 2013. .
532. ↑ Biddle, Jeff; Samuels, Warren; Davis, John (2006). A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 319. "What became known as the socialist calculation debate started when von Mises (1935 [1920]) launched a critique of socialism."
533. ↑ Levy, David M.; Peart, Sandra J. (2008). "Socialist calculation debate". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Second ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
534. ↑ Hahnel, Robin (2002). The ABC's of Political Economy. Pluto Press. p. 262.
535. ↑ "On Milton Friedman, MGR & Annaism". Sangam.org. http://www.sangam.org/taraki/articles/2006/11-25_Friedman_MGR.php?uid=2075.
536. ↑ Bellamy, Richard (2003). The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0521563543.
537. ↑ Acs, Zoltan J.; Young, Bernard (1999). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy. University of Michigan Press. p. 47.
538. ↑ Peter, Self (1995). "Socialism". in Goodin, Robert E.; Pettit, Philip. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Blackwell Publishing. p. 339. "Extreme equality overlooks the diversity of individual talents, tastes and needs, and save in a utopian society of unselfish individuals would entail strong coercion; but even short of this goal, there is the problem of giving reasonable recognition to different individual needs, tastes (for work or leisure) and talents. It is true therefore that beyond some point the pursuit of equality runs into controversial or contradictory criteria of need or merit."
539. ↑ Bellamy, Richard (2003). The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0521563543.
540. ↑ Piereson, James. "Socialism as a hate crime" (in en). https://newcriterion.com/blogs/dispatch/socialism-as-a-hate-crime-9746.
541. ↑ Engel-DiMauro (2021), pp. 1–17.
542. ↑ Satter, David (6 November 2017). "100 Years of Communism—and 100 Million Dead" (in en-US). The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810.
543. ↑ Bevins (2020), pp. 238–240; Ghodsee & Sehon (2018); Engel-DiMauro (2021), pp. 1–17; Sullivan & Hickel (2022)

### Bibliography

* Aarons, Mark (2007). "Justice Betrayed: Post-1945 Responses to Genocide". in Blumenthal, David A.; McCormack, Timothy L. H.. The Legacy of Nuremberg: Civilising Influence or Institutionalised Vengeance? (International Humanitarian Law). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-9004156913. https://books.google.com/books?id=dg0hWswKgTIC&pg=PA69.
* Arneson, Richard J. (April 1992). "Is Socialism Dead? A Comment on Market Socialism and Basic Income Capitalism". Ethics 102 (3): 485–511. doi:10.1086/293421.
* Arnold, N. Scott (1994). The Philosophy and Economics of Market Socialism: A Critical Study. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195088274. https://archive.org/details/philosophyeconom00arno.
* Badie, Bertrand; Berg-Schlosser, Dirk; Morlino, Leonardo, eds (2011). International Encyclopedia of Political Science. SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412994163. ISBN 978-1-4129-5963-6.
* Bailey, David J. (2009). The Political Economy of European Social Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach. Routledge. ISBN 978-04156-04253.
* Barrett, William, ed (1 April 1978). "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy: A Symposium". Commentary. https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/capitalism-socialism-and-democracy/. Retrieved 14 June 2020.
* Beckett, Francis (2007). Clem Attlee. Politico's. ISBN 978-1842751923.
* Berlau, A. Joseph (1949). The German Social Democratic Party, 1914–1921. New York: Columbia University Press.
* Berman, Sheri (1998). The Social Democratic Moment. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-067444261-0.
* Best, Steven; Kahn, Richard; Nocella II, Anthony J. et al., eds (2011). "Introduction: Pathologies of Power and the Rise of the Global Industrial Complex". The Global Industrial Complex: Systems of Domination. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0739136980.
* Bevins, Vincent (2020). The Jakarta Method: Washington's Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped Our World. PublicAffairs. pp. 238–240. ISBN 978-1541742406.
* Bockman, Johanna (2011). Markets in the name of Socialism: The Left-Wing origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0804775663.
* Brandal, Nik; Bratberg, Øivind; Thorsen, Dag Einar (2013). The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN 978-1137013262.
* Brus, Wlodzimierz (2015). The Economics and Politics of Socialism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415866477.
* Busky, Donald F. (2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. ISBN 978-0275968861.
* Caulcutt, Clea (13 January 2022). "The end of the French left" (in en-US). POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/christiane-taubira-last-resort-savior-france-left-tatters/.
* Engel-DiMauro, Salvatore (2 January 2021). "Anti-Communism and the Hundreds of Millions of Victims of Capitalism". Capitalism Nature Socialism 32 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/10455752.2021.1875603. ISSN 1045-5752.
* Esposito, John L. (1995). Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0195066135. OCLC 94030758. https://archive.org/details/oxfordencycloped01espo/page/19.
* Gaus, Gerald F.; Kukathas, Chandran (2004). Handbook of Political Theory. Sage. ISBN 978-0761967873.
* Ghodsee, Kristen (2017). Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0822369493. https://www.dukeupress.edu/red-hangover.
* Ghodsee, Kristen R.; Sehon, Scott (22 March 2018). "Anti-anti-communism". https://aeon.co/essays/the-merits-of-taking-an-anti-anti-communism-stance. "A 2009 poll in eight east European countries asked if the economic situation for ordinary people was 'better, worse or about the same as it was under communism'. The results stunned observers: 72 per cent of Hungarians, and 62 per cent of both Ukrainians and Bulgarians believed that most people were worse off after 1989. In no country did more than 47 per cent of those surveyed agree that their lives improved after the advent of free markets. Subsequent polls and qualitative research across Russia and eastern Europe confirm the persistence of these sentiments as popular discontent with the failed promises of free-market prosperity has grown, especially among older people."
* Hanna, Sami A.; Gardner, George H. (1969). Arab Socialism: A Documentary Survey. Leiden: E.J. Brill. pp. 273–274. https://books.google.com/books?id=zsoUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA273.
* Hanna, Sami A. (1969). "al-Takaful al-Ijtimai and Islamic Socialism". The Muslim World 59 (3–4): 275–286. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.1969.tb02639.x. http://www.financeinislam.com/article/1_37/1/309.
* Heilbroner, Robert L. (1991). "From Sweden to Socialism: A Small Symposium on Big Questions". Dissident. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/from-sweden-to-socialism-social-democracy-symposium. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
* Horvat, Branko (1982). The Political Economy of Socialism.
* Horvat, Branko (2000). "Social ownership". in Michie, Jonathan. Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences. 1. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 1515–1516. ISBN 978-1135932268. https://books.google.com/books?id=ip_IAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1516. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
* Kendall, Diana (2011). Sociology in Our Time: The Essentials. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1111305505.
* Kotz, David M. (December 2006). "Socialism and Capitalism: Are They Qualitatively Different Socioeconomic Systems?". University of Massachusetts. http://people.umass.edu/dmkotz/Soc_and_Cap_Diff_Syst_06_12.pdf.
* Krause-Jackson, Flavia (28 December 2019). "Socialism declining in Europe as populism support grows" (in en). The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/socialism-europe-parties-populism-corbyn-left-wing-francois-holland-snp-a9262656.html.
* Lamb, Peter; Docherty, J. C. (2006). Historical Dictionary of Socialism (2nd ed.). Lanham: The Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0810855601.
* Lamb, Peter (2015). Historical Dictionary of Socialism (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1442258266.
* Li, He (2015). Political Thought and China's Transformation: Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao China. Springer. ISBN 978-1137427816.
* McLaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 9780754661962. https://books.google.com/books?id=kkj5i3CeGbQC.
* Meyer, Thomas (2013). The Theory of Social Democracy. Wiley. ISBN 978-0745673523. OCLC 843638352.
* Newman, Michael (2005). Socialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0192804310.
* Nove, Alexander (1991). The Economics of Feasible Socialism Revisited. Routledge. ISBN 9780044460152.
* Orlow, Dietrich (2000). Common Destiny: A Comparative History of the Dutch, French, and German Social Democratic Parties, 1945–1969. New York City: Berghahn Books. ISBN 9781571811851.
* "Abu Dharr al-Ghifari". Oxford University. http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e30?_hi=0&_pos=5.
* Prychitko, David L. (2002). Markets, Planning, and Democracy: Essays After the Collapse of Communism. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1840645194.
* Robinson, Geoffrey B. (2018). The Killing Season: A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965–66. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1400888863. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11135.html. Retrieved 1 August 2018.
* Roemer, John E. (1994). A Future for Socialism. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-067433946-0.
* Roosa, John (2006). Pretext for Mass Murder: 30 September Movement and Suharto's Coup d'État in Indonesia. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0299220341.
* Rosser, Marina V.; Barkley, J. Jr. (2003). Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. MIT Press. pp. 53. ISBN 978-0262182348. https://archive.org/details/comparativeecono00jrjb.
* Sanandaji, Nima (27 October 2021). "Nordic Countries Aren't Actually Socialist" (in en-US). https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/27/nordic-countries-not-socialist-denmark-norway-sweden-centrist/.
* Schweickart, David; Lawler, James; Ticktin, Hillel; Ollman, Bertell (1998). "The Difference Between Marxism and Market Socialism". Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415919678.
* Simpson, Bradley (2010). Economists with Guns: Authoritarian Development and U.S.–Indonesian Relations, 1960–1968. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0804771825.
* Sinclair, Upton (1918). Upton Sinclair's: A Monthly Magazine: for Social Justice, by Peaceful Means If Possible. https://books.google.com/books?id=i0w9AQAAMAAJ.
* Steele, David Ramsay (1999). From Marx to Mises: Post Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. Open Court. ISBN 978-0875484495.
* Sullivan, Dylan; Hickel, Jason (2 December 2022). "How British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years". Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/12/2/how-british-colonial-policy-killed-100-million-indians. "While the precise number of deaths is sensitive to the assumptions we make about baseline mortality, it is clear that somewhere in the vicinity of 100 million people died prematurely at the height of British colonialism. This is among the largest policy-induced mortality crises in human history. It is larger than the combined number of deaths that occurred during all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, North Korea, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, and Mengistu’s Ethiopia."
* Weisskopf, Thomas E. (1992). "Toward a Socialism for the Future, in the Wake of the Demise of the Socialism of the Past". Review of Radical Political Economics 24 (3–4): 1–28. doi:10.1177/048661349202400302.
* Woodcock, George (1962). Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.
* Zimbalist, Andrew; Sherman, Howard J.; Brown, Stuart (1988). Comparing Economic Systems: A Political-Economic Approach. Harcourt College Pub. p. 7. ISBN 978-0155124035. https://archive.org/details/comparingeconomi0000zimb_q8i6/page/7.

## Further reading

* Bellarmine, Robert (1902). "Socialism.". Sermons from the Latins. Benziger Brothers.
* Cohen, Gerald (2009). Why Not Socialism?. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691143613.
* Cole, G. D. H. (2003). History of Socialist Thought, in 7 volumes (reprint ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 140390264X.
* Cole, George Douglas Howard (1922). "Socialism". in Chisholm, Hugh. Encyclopædia Britannica (12th ed.). London & New York.
* Ellman, Michael (2014). Socialist Planning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1107427327. http://www.cambridge.org/US/academic/subjects/economics/economics-general-interest/socialist-planning-3rd-edition.
* Frank, Peter; McAloon, Jim (2016). Labour: The New Zealand Labour Party, 1916–2016. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press. ISBN 978-1776560745. https://vup.victoria.ac.nz/brands/Peter-Franks-&-Jim-McAloon.html. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
* Fried, Albert; Sanders, Ronald, eds (1964). Socialist Thought: A Documentary History. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
* Ghodsee, Kristen (2018). Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-1568588902.
* Harrington, Michael (1972). Socialism. New York: Bantam.
* Harrington, Michael (2011). Socialism: Past and Future. Arcade Publishing. ISBN 978-1611453355.
* Hayes, Carlton J. H. (1917). "The History of German Socialism Reconsidered". American Historical Review 23 (1): 62–101. doi:10.2307/1837686.
* Heilbroner, Robert (2008). Henderson, David R.. ed. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. pp. 466–468. ISBN 978-0865976665. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Socialism.html.
* Imlay, Talbot (2018). The Practice of Socialist Internationalism: European Socialists and International Politics, 1914–1960. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199641048.001.0001. ISBN 9780191774317.
* Itoh, Makoto (1995). Political Economy of Socialism. London: Macmillan. ISBN 0333553373.
* Kitching, Gavin (1983). Rethinking Socialism. Meuthen. ISBN 978-0416358407. https://archive.org/details/rethinkingsocial0000kitc.
* Oskar, Lange (1938). On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
* Lebowitz, Michael (2006). "Build It Now: Socialism for the 21st century". Monthly Review Press. ISBN 1583671455. http://www.monthlyreview.org/builditnow.htm.
* Lichtheim, George (1970). A Short History of Socialism. Praeger Publishers.
* Maass, Alan (2010). The Case for Socialism (Updated ed.). Haymarket Books. ISBN 978-1608460731.
* Marx & Engels, Selected works in one volume, Lawrence and Wishart (1968) ISBN 978-0853151814.
* Muravchik, Joshua (2002). Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism. San Francisco: Encounter Books. ISBN 1893554457. https://www.pbs.org/heavenonearth/resources.html.
* Navarro, V. (1992). "Has socialism failed? An analysis of health indicators under socialism". International Journal of Health Services 23 (2): 583–601. doi:10.2190/B2TP-3R5M-Q7UP-DUA2. PMID 1399170.
* Bertell Ollman, ed., Market Socialism: The Debate among Socialists, Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0415919673.
* Leo Panitch, Renewing Socialism: Democracy, Strategy, and Imagination. ISBN 0813398215.
* Emile Perreau-Saussine, What remains of socialism?, in Patrick Riordan (dir.), Values in Public life: aspects of common goods (Berlin, LIT Verlag, 2007), pp. 11–34.
* Piketty, Thomas (2021). Time for Socialism: Dispatches from a World on Fire, 2016–2021. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300259667. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300259667/time-socialism.
* Pipes, Richard (2000). Property and Freedom. Vintage. ISBN 0375704477.
* Prychitko, David L. (2008). Hamowy, Ronald. ed. The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 474–476. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n290. ISBN 978-1412965804. https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/libertarianism/n290.xml.
* Rubel, Maximilien; Crump, John (8 August 1987). Non-Market Socialism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. St. Martin's Press. ISBN 0312005245.
* Sassoon, Donald (1998). One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. New Press. ISBN 1565844866.
* Sunkara, Bhaskar, ed (2016). The ABCs of Socialism. Verso Books. ISBN 978-1784787264.
* Verdery, Katherine (1996). What Was Socialism, What Comes Next. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 069101132X.
* Webb, Sidney (1889). "The Basis of Socialism – Historic". Library of Economics and Liberty. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1889webb.asp.
* Weinstein, James (2003). Long Detour: The History and Future of the American Left (hardcover ed.). Westview Press. ISBN 0813341043.
* Wilberg, Peter (2003). Deep Socialism: A New Manifesto of Marxist Ethics and Economics. New Gnosis Publications. ISBN 1904519024. http://www.newgnosis.co.uk/deep.html.

## External links

* Socialism – entry at Britannica.com
* Socialism at Curlie
* "Socialism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/socialis/.
* Cuban Socialism from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives.
* Kirkup (1875–1889). "Socialism". Encyclopædia Britannica. XXII (9th ed.).
* "Socialism". New International Encyclopedia. 1905.
* Cole, G. D. H. (1922). "Socialism". Encyclopædia Britannica (12th ed.).

#invoke:Navbox

Template:Navboxes #invoke:subject bar

Template:Sourceattribution

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Socialism&oldid=1012391"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template
*[c.]: circa