Uterine cancer surgery

Uterine cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Differentiating Uterine cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Staging

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Uterine cancer surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Uterine cancer surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Uterine cancer surgery

CDC on Uterine cancer surgery

Uterine cancer surgery in the news

Blogs on Uterine cancer surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Uterine cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Uterine cancer surgery

Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing. Preoperative evaluation should include a complete medical history and physical examination, pelvic examination and rectal examination with stool guaiac test, chest X-ray, complete blood count, and blood chemistry tests, including liver function tests.

Total extrafascial hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy with pelvic or para-aortic lymph node dissection is standard procedure. Abdominal hysterectomy is recommended over vaginal hysterectomy because it affords the opportunity to examine and obtain washings of the abdominal cavity to detect any further evidence of cancer. Complete removal of omentum is warranted for serous or clear cell variety. If a surgeon happens to palpate and find enlarged pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes, then their sampling or removal is required.

In the operating room, the dissected uterine specimen must be grossly visualized to look for myometrial invasion. In multicenter series of 403 patients who underwent TAH-BSO, the sensitivity , specificity, positive and negative predictive value of gross assessment of myometrial invasion was found to be 73, 93, 85 and 86% respectively. Frozen section of area of invasion is a good practice but it has not shown consistent results.

### When to resect lymph nodes?[edit | edit source]

If the following are present-

* Serous, clear cell or high grade tumor.
* Myometrial invasion >50%
* Large tumor ,i.e >2cm in diameter.

### Pelvic lymph node dissection[edit | edit source]

Removal of nodes from distal half of each of common iliac artery, proximal half of external iliac artery and vein and distal half of obturator fat pad.

### Para-aortic lymph node dissection[edit | edit source]

Removal of nodes from distal inferior vena cava. These lymph nodes may be positive even if pelvic are not. Hence there has been some survival benefit in females with immediate or high risk disease from dissection of para-aortic group.

It is still controversial whether to go for just lymph node sampling or dissection. Even if the surgeon does sampling, it has to be done from multiple sites of lymph node groups draining the uterus. It is vital for surgical staging purposes to have atleast lymph node sampling done during surgery, if not dissection.

Risk of lymphedema increases as more lymph nodes are resected (>10 is associated with a risk of lymphedema of 3-10%). So, it is logical to have risk versus benefit assessment before going for dissection.

Lymphovascular invasion predicts well whether the cancer has spread to the parametrium or not. Earlier, the spread of endometrial cancer to the cervix was considered to be a sign of parametrial extension and patients had undergone radical hysterectomy. With this knowledge, one can now have simple hysterectomy in stage II cancer.

### Newer surgical approaches[edit | edit source]

* Laparoscopy- There are fewer intra-operative complications and shorter duration of hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible. However, it is a lengthy procedure, it is difficult to resect para-aortic nodes and effectiveness does not significantly differ when compared to surgery.

* Robot-assisted laparoscopy — There is less chance of hemorrhage compared to laparotomy and laparoscopy. It suffers a similar setback as laparoscopy in operation time being longer than laparotomy.

## References[edit | edit source]

Template:WikiDoc Sources