1911 Canadian federal election

* * *

| <- 1908 | September 21, 1911 | 1917 ->

|
|

<- outgoing members

elected members ->

* * *

221 seats in the House of Commons
111 seats needed for a majority
Turnout| 70.2%[1] ( 0.1 pp)
|  | First party  | Second party

|
|

|  |
Leader  | Robert Borden | Wilfrid Laurier
Party  | Conservative | Liberal
Leader since  | 1901  | 1887
Leader's seat  | Halifax | Soulanges
Quebec East[a]
Last election  | 85 seats, 46.2%  | 133 seats, 48.9%
Seats won  | 132 | 85
Seat change  |  47  |  48
Popular vote  | 632,539 | 596,871
Percentage  | 48.56% | 45.82%
Swing  |  2.35 pp |  3.05 pp

* * *

* * *

The Canadian parliament after the 1911 election

* * *

| Prime Minister before election

Wilfrid Laurier
Liberal

| Prime Minister after election

Robert Borden
Conservative

|

The 1911 Canadian federal election was held on September 21, 1911, to elect members of the House of Commons of Canada of the 12th Parliament of Canada.

The central issue was Liberal support for a proposed agreement with the United States president William Howard Taft to lower tariffs. The Conservative Party denounced it with claims it would weaken ties with Britain, hurt the Canadian economy and Canadian identity, and lead to American annexation of Canada. The idea of a Canadian Navy was also an issue.

The Conservatives won, and Robert Borden became the eighth prime minister. The election ended 15 years of government by the Liberal Party of Wilfrid Laurier.

## Navy

[edit]

The Liberal government was caught up in a debate over the naval arms race between the British Empire and Germany. Laurier attempted a compromise by starting up the Canadian Navy (now the Royal Canadian Navy) but failed to appease either the French-Canadians or English-Canadians: the former refused giving any aid, and the latter suggested sending money directly to Britain. After the election, the Conservatives drew up a bill for naval contributions to the British, but it was held up by a lengthy Liberal filibuster before it was passed in the House of Commons by invoking closure, only to be defeated by the Liberal-controlled Senate.

## Ties to Britain

[edit]

Many English Canadians in British Columbia and the Maritimes felt that Laurier was abandoning Canada's traditional links to their mother country, Great Britain. On the other side, the Quebec nationalist Henri Bourassa, who had earlier quit the Liberal Party over what he considered the government's pro-British policies, campaigned against Laurier in the province. Ironically, Bourassa's attacks on Laurier in Quebec aided in the election of the Conservatives, who held policies that were more staunchly imperialist than those of the Liberals.

In mid-1910, Laurier had attempted to kill the naval issue, which was setting English-Canadians against French-Canadians by opening talks for a reciprocity treaty with the United States. He believed that an economically favourable treaty would appeal to most Canadians and have the additional benefit of dividing the Conservatives between the western wing of the party, which had long wanted free trade with the United States, and the eastern wing, which was more hostile to Continentalism.[2]

In January 1911, Laurier and US President William Howard Taft announced that they signed a reciprocity agreement, which they decided to pass by concurrent legislation rather than a formal treaty, as would normally have been the case.[2] As such, the reciprocity agreement had to be ratified by both houses of the US Congress rather than just the US Senate, which Laurier would later regret.

## Ties to United States

[edit]

The base of Liberal support shifted to Western Canada, which sought markets for its agricultural products. The party had long been a proponent of free trade with the United States.[2] The protected manufacturing businesses of Central Canada were strongly against the idea. The Liberals, who by ideology and history had strongly supported free trade, decided to make the issue the central plank of their re-election strategy, and they negotiated a free trade agreement in natural products with the United States.

### Clark speech

[edit]

Allen argues that two speeches by American politicians gave the Conservatives the ammunition needed to arouse anti-American, pro-British sentiments, which provided the winning votes. The Speaker of the US House of Representatives was a Democrat, Champ Clark, and he declared, on the floor of the House, "I look forward to the time when the American flag will fly over every square foot of British North America up to the North Pole. The people of Canada are of our blood and language."[3] Clark went on to suggest in his speech that reciprocity agreement was the first step towards the end of Canada, a speech that was greeted with "prolonged applause" according to the Congressional Record.[4] The Washington Post reported, "Evidently, then, the Democrats generally approved of Mr. Clark's annexation sentiments and voted for the reciprocity bill because, among other things, it improves the prospect of annexation."[4]

The Chicago Tribune, in an editorial, condemned Clark and warned that Clark's speech might have fatally damaged the reciprocity agreement in Canada and stated, "He lets his imagination run wild like a Missouri mule on a rampage. Remarks about the absorption of one country by another grate harshly on the ears of the smaller."[4]

A Republican Representative, William Stiles Bennet, a member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, introduced a resolution that asked the Taft administration to begin talks with Britain on how the United States might best annex Canada. Taft rejected the proposal and asked the committee to take a vote on the resolution, which only Bennett supported, but the Conservatives now had more ammunition.[5] Since Bennett, a strong protectionist, had been an opponent of the reciprocity agreement, the Canadian historian Chantal Allen suggested that Bennett had introduced his resolution deliberately to inflame Canadian opinion against the reciprocity agreement.[5] Clark's speech had already provoked massive outrage in Canada. Bennett's resolution was taken by many Canadians as more proof that the Conservatives were right that the reciprocity agreement would result in the US annexing Canada.[5]

The Washington Post noted that the effect of Clark's speech and Bennett's resolution in Canada had "roused the opponents of reciprocity in and out of Parliament to the highest pitch of excitement they have yet reached".[6] The Montreal Daily Star, English Canada's most widely read newspaper and had supported the Liberals and reciprocity, now did a volte-face and turned against the reciprocity agreement. In an editorial, it wrote, "None of us realized the inward meaning of the shrewdly framed offer of the long headed American government when we first saw it. It was as cunning a trap as ever laid. The master bargainers of Washington have not lost their skill."[7]

### Anti-Americanism

[edit]

Contemporary accounts mentioned in the aftermath of Clark's speech that anti-Americanism was at an all-time high in Canada.[7] Many American newspapers advised their readers that if they visited Canada, they should not identify themselves as American, or they could become the objects of abuse and hatred from the Canadians.[7] The New York Times, in a July 1911 report stated that Laurier was "having the fight of his career to carry reciprocity at all".[8] One Conservative MP compared the relationship of Finance Minister William Stevens Fielding and Taft to Samson and Delilah, with Fielding having "succumbed to the Presidential blandishments."[8]

When the reciprocity agreement was submitted by Laurier to the House of Commons for ratification by Parliament, the Conservatives waged a vigorous filibuster against the reciprocity agreement on the floor of the House.[8] Although the Liberals still had two years left in their mandate, they decided to call an election to settle the issue after it had aroused controversy, and Laurier was unable to break the filibuster.[8]

Borden largely ran on a platform of opposing the reciprocity agreement under the grounds that it would "Americanize" Canada and claimed that there was a secret plan on the part of the Taft administration to annex Canada, with the reciprocity agreement being only the first step.[9] In his first speech given in London, Borden declared, "It is beyond doubt that the leading public men of the United States, its leading press, and the mass of its people believe annexation of the Dominion to be the ultimate, inevitable, and desirable result of this proposition, and for that reason support it."[9]

To support his claims, the Conservatives produced thousands of pamphlets reproducing the speeches of Clark and Bennett, which encouraged a massive burst of anti-Americanism that was sweeping across English Canada in 1911.[9]

One American newspaper wrote that the Conservatives were portraying the Americans as "a corrupt, bragging, boodle-hunting and negro lynching crowd from which Canadian workingmen and the Canadian land of milk and honey must be saved."[9] On 7 September 1911, the Montreal Star published a front-page appeal to all Canadians by the popular British poet Rudyard Kipling, who had been asked by his friend, Max Aitken, to write something for the Conservatives.[10] Kipling wrote in his appeal to Canadians, "It is her own soul that Canada risks today. Once that soul is pawned for any consideration, Canada must inevitably conform to the commercial, legal, financial, social and ethical standards which will be imposed on her by the sheer admitted weight of the United States."[10] Kipling's appeal attracted much media attention in English Canada and was reprinted over the next week, in every English newspaper in Canada.[10]

## Immigration

[edit]

In British Columbia, the Conservative Party ran on the slogan "A White Canada" by playing to the fears of British Columbians who resented the increasing presence of cheap Asian labour and the resulting depression in wages.[11]

## Results

[edit]

The campaign went badly for the Liberals, however. The powerful manufacturing interests of Toronto and Montreal switched their allegiance and financing to the Conservatives, who argued that free trade would undermine Canadian sovereignty and lead to a slow annexation of Canada by the US. In an editorial after Borden's victory, the Los Angeles Times wrote: "Their ballots have consigned to everlasting flames the bogy of annexation by the United States which Champ Clark called from the deeps. It was not really a wraith of anything that existed on this side of the line. It was a pumpkin scarehead with blazing eyes, a crooked slit for a nose, and a hideous grinning mouth which the fun-loving Champ placed upon a pole along with the Stars and Stripes, the while he carried terror to loyal Canuck hearts by his derisive shout of annexation."[12]

Dow Grass of Deer Island was arrested for tampering with ballot boxes leading to the Sunbury—Queen's riding's invalidation of results.[13]

The election is often compared to the 1988 federal election, which was also fought over free trade, but the positions of the two parties were now reversed, with the Liberals against the Conservatives' trade proposals.

The Conservatives dominated in Ontario, British Columbia and Manitoba. They also made significant gains in Quebec and Atlantic Canada, although the Liberals still won pluralities in both regions. The Liberals continued to dominate in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where free trade was extremely popular. Notably, this remains the most recent federal election where the Liberals would win the most seats in Alberta (although most Albertan Liberals supported the Borden-led Unionist government during the First World War).

### National results

[edit]

Party  | Party leader  | # of
candidates  | Seats  | Popular vote

|
|
|
|

1908 | Elected  | Change  | #  | %  | Change
| Conservative 1 | Robert Borden | 208  | 82  | 131 | +59.8%  | 625,697  | 48.03%  | +3.08pp
| Liberal-Conservative | 2  | 3  | 1 | -66.7%  | 6,842  | 0.53%  | -0.74pp
| Liberal 2 | Wilfrid Laurier | 214  | 133  | 85  | -36.1%  | 596,871  | 45.82%  | -3.05pp
| Independent Conservative  | 3  | \-  | 3 |  | 12,499  | 0.96%  | +0.50pp
| Labour |  | 3  | 1  | 1 | \-  | 12,101  | 0.93%  | +0.04pp
| Unknown  | 10  | \-  | \-  | \-  | 25,857  | 1.98%  | +0.83pp
| Independent  | 12  | 1  | \-  | -100%  | 10,346  | 0.79%  | -0.65pp
| Socialist |  | 6  | \-  | \-  | \-  | 4,574  | 0.35%  | -0.17pp
| Nationalist Conservative 3 |  | 2  | *  | \-  | *  | 4,399  | 0.34%  | *
| Nationalist  |  | 1  | *  | \-  | *  | 3,533  | 0.27%  | *
Total | 461 | 220 | 221 | +0.5% | 1,302,719 | 100% |
Sources: http://www.elections.ca \-- History of Federal Ridings since 1867

Notes:

* Party did not nominate candidates in the previous election.

1 One Conservative candidate was acclaimed in Ontario.

2 One Liberal candidate was acclaimed in Ontario, and two Liberals were acclaimed in Quebec.

### Results by province

[edit]

Party name  | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | YK | Total

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

| Conservative | Seats:  | 7  | 1  | 1  | 8  | 71  | 26  | 5  | 9  | 2  | 1  | 131
| Popular vote (%):  | 58.7  | 38.5  | 39.0  | 51.9  | 53.5  | 44.1  | 43.6  | 44.5  | 51.1  | 60.8  | 48.0
| Liberal | Seats:  | \-  | 6  | 9  | 2  | 13  | 36  | 8  | 9  | 2  | \-  | 85
| Vote (%):  | 37.7  | 53.3  | 59.4  | 44.8  | 41.2  | 44.6  | 47.7  | 55.2  | 48.9  | 39.2  | 45.8
| Independent Conservative  | Seats:  |  |  |  |  | 1  | 2  |  |  |  |  | 3
| Vote (%):  |  |  |  |  | 1.5  | 1.6  |  |  |  |  | 1.0
| Labour | Seats:  |  |  |  |  | \-  | 1  |  |  |  |  | 1
| Vote (%):  |  |  |  |  | 0.1  | 3.6  |  |  |  |  | 0.9
| Liberal-Conservative | Seats:  |  | \-  |  |  | 1  |  |  |  |  |  | 1
| Vote (%):  |  | 4.1  |  |  | 0.8  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.5
Total Seats | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 86 | 65 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 221
Parties that won no seats:
| Unknown  | Vote (%):  |  | 1.0  |  |  | 2.1  | 2.6  | 8.7  |  |  |  | 2.0
| Independent  | Vote (%):  |  | 3.1  | 1.6  | 0.3  | 0.5  | 1.2  |  | 0.3  |  |  | 0.8
| Socialist | Vote (%):  | 3.7  |  |  | 3.0  | 0.2  | 0.1  |  |  |  |  | 0.4
| Nationalist Conservative | Vote (%):  |  |  |  |  | 0.3  | 1.0  |  |  |  |  | 0.3
| Nationalist  | Vote (%):  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.1  |  |  |  |  | 0.3

## Detailed analysis

[edit]

### Synopsis of results

[edit]

1911 Canadian federal election – synopsis of riding results[14][15] Electoral district  | Winning party  | Votes

|
|

Province  | Name  | 1908 | 1st
place  | Votes  | Share  | Margin
#  | Margin
%  | 2nd
place  | Con | Lib-Con | Ind-Con | Nat-Con | Lib | Lab | Soc | Nat | Ind | Total
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
AB | Calgary |  | Con |  | Con | 7,671 | 58.15% | 2,866 | 21.73% |  | Lib | 7,671 | – | – | – | 4,805 | – | – | – | 716 | 13,192
AB | Edmonton |  | Lib |  | Lib | 7,070 | 56.76% | 2,238 | 17.97% |  | Con | 4,832 | – | – | – | 7,070 | – | – | – | 555 | 12,457
AB | Macleod |  | Lib-Con |  | Lib | 3,660 | 49.44% | 819 | 11.06% |  | Lib-Con | – | 2,841 | – | – | 3,660 | – | – | – | 902 | 7,403
AB | Medicine Hat |  | Con |  | Lib | 6,330 | 56.49% | 1,455 | 12.99% |  | Con | 4,875 | – | – | – | 6,330 | – | – | – | – | 11,205
AB | Red Deer |  | Lib |  | Lib | 6,711 | 63.35% | 2,829 | 26.71% |  | Con | 3,882 | – | – | – | 6,711 | – | – | – | – | 10,593
AB | Strathcona |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,396 | 65.26% | 2,524 | 30.53% |  | Con | 2,872 | – | – | – | 5,396 | – | – | – | – | 8,268
AB | Victoria |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,225 | 48.53% | 523 | 7.87% |  | Con | 2,702 | – | – | – | 3,225 | – | – | – | 719 | 6,646
BC | Comox—Atlin |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,810 | 52.74% | 188 | 5.48% |  | Lib | 1,810 | – | – | – | 1,622 | – | – | – | – | 3,432
BC | Kootenay |  | Con |  | Con | 4,113 | 57.51% | 1,074 | 15.02% |  | Lib | 4,113 | – | – | – | 3,039 | – | – | – | – | 7,152
BC | Nanaimo |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,438 | 58.21% | 688 | 16.43% |  | Lib | 2,438 | – | – | – | 1,750 | – | – | – | – | 4,188
BC | New Westminster |  | Con |  | Con | 3,542 | 65.70% | 1,693 | 31.40% |  | Lib | 3,542 | – | – | – | 1,849 | – | – | – | – | 5,391
BC | Vancouver City |  | Con |  | Con | 6,902 | 58.72% | 3,106 | 26.43% |  | Lib | 6,902 | – | – | – | 3,796 | – | 1,056 | – | – | 11,754
BC | Victoria City |  | Con |  | Con | 2,816 | 51.78% | 484 | 8.90% |  | Lib | 2,816 | – | – | – | 2,332 | – | 290 | – | – | 5,438
BC | Yale—Cariboo |  | Con |  | Con | 3,851 | 63.56% | 1,889 | 31.18% |  | Lib | 3,851 | – | – | – | 1,962 | – | 246 | – | – | 6,059
MB | Brandon |  | Lib |  | Con | 4,436 | 55.41% | 866 | 10.82% |  | Lib | 4,436 | – | – | – | 3,570 | – | – | – | – | 8,006
MB | Dauphin |  | Con |  | Lib | 3,674 | 55.67% | 748 | 11.33% |  | Con | 2,926 | – | – | – | 3,674 | – | – | – | – | 6,600
MB | Lisgar |  | Con |  | Con | 1,692 | 50.30% | 20 | 0.59% |  | Lib | 1,692 | – | – | – | 1,672 | – | – | – | – | 3,364
MB | Macdonald |  | Con |  | Con | 2,956 | 51.40% | 161 | 2.80% |  | Lib | 2,956 | – | – | – | 2,795 | – | – | – | – | 5,751
MB | Marquette |  | Con |  | Con | 3,409 | 50.94% | 126 | 1.88% |  | Lib | 3,409 | – | – | – | 3,283 | – | – | – | – | 6,692
MB | Portage la Prairie |  | Con |  | Con | 3,267 | 55.76% | 675 | 11.52% |  | Lib | 3,267 | – | – | – | 2,592 | – | – | – | – | 5,859
MB | Provencher |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,049 | 53.33% | 381 | 6.66% |  | Con | 2,668 | – | – | – | 3,049 | – | – | – | – | 5,717
MB | Selkirk |  | Con |  | Con | 3,098 | 48.84% | 87 | 1.37% |  | Lib | 3,098 | – | – | – | 3,011 | – | – | – | 234 | 6,343
MB | Souris |  | Con |  | Con | 3,150 | 50.51% | 64 | 1.03% |  | Lib | 3,150 | – | – | – | 3,086 | – | – | – | – | 6,236
MB | Winnipeg |  | Con |  | Con | 12,754 | 55.15% | 4,705 | 20.34% |  | Lib | 12,754 | – | – | – | 8,049 | – | 2,325 | – | – | 23,128
NB | Carleton |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,614 | 50.11% | 11 | 0.21% |  | Con | 2,603 | – | – | – | 2,614 | – | – | – | – | 5,217
NB | Charlotte |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,685 | 51.89% | 196 | 3.79% |  | Lib | 2,685 | – | – | – | 2,489 | – | – | – | – | 5,174
NB | Gloucester |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,172 | 59.27% | 992 | 18.54% |  | Con | 2,180 | – | – | – | 3,172 | – | – | – | – | 5,352
NB | Kent |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,334 | 52.30% | 205 | 4.59% |  | Lib | 2,334 | – | – | – | 2,129 | – | – | – | – | 4,463
NB | King's and Albert |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,734 | 52.33% | 332 | 4.65% |  | Lib | 3,734 | – | – | – | 3,402 | – | – | – | – | 7,136
NB | Northumberland |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,128 | 53.34% | 392 | 6.68% |  | Con | 2,736 | – | – | – | 3,128 | – | – | – | – | 5,864
NB | Restigouche |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,512 | 56.38% | 342 | 12.75% |  | Con | 1,170 | – | – | – | 1,512 | – | – | – | – | 2,682
NB | City and County of St. John |  | Lib |  | Con | 5,491 | 50.51% | 110 | 1.01% |  | Lib | 5,491[a 1] | – | – | – | 5,381 | – | – | – | – | 10,872
NB | City of St. John |  | Con |  | Lib | 4,360 | 50.38% | 65 | 0.75% |  | Con | 4,295 | – | – | – | 4,360[a 1] | – | – | – | – | 8,655
NB | Sunbury—Queen's |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,020 | 50.12% | 10 | 0.25% |  | Con | 2,010 | – | – | – | 2,020 | – | – | – | – | 4,030
NB | Victoria |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,059 | 73.36% | 1,948 | 46.71% |  | Con | 1,111 | – | – | – | 3,059 | – | – | – | – | 4,170
NB | Westmorland |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,452 | 50.36% | 64 | 0.72% |  | Ind | – | – | – | – | 4,452 | – | – | – | 4,388 | 8,840
NB | York |  | Con |  | Con | 4,143 | 62.61% | 1,669 | 25.22% |  | Ind | 4,143 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,474 | 6,617
NS | Annapolis |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,131 | 50.15% | 13 | 0.31% |  | Lib | 2,131 | – | – | – | 2,118 | – | – | – | – | 4,249
NS | Antigonish |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,468 | 59.80% | 481 | 19.59% |  | Con | 987 | – | – | – | 1,468 | – | – | – | – | 2,455
NS | Cape Breton South |  | Lib-Con |  | Lib | 5,069 | 49.42% | 104 | 1.01% |  | Lib | – | – | – | – | 10,034[a 2] | – | – | – | 223 | 10,257
NS | Colchester |  | Con |  | Con | 2,847 | 56.38% | 644 | 12.75% |  | Lib | 2,847 | – | – | – | 2,203 | – | – | – | – | 5,050
NS | Cumberland |  | Con |  | Con | 4,780 | 51.83% | 338 | 3.67% |  | Lib | 4,780 | – | – | – | 4,442 | – | – | – | – | 9,222
NS | Digby |  | Con |  | Con | 2,126 | 53.26% | 260 | 6.51% |  | Lib | 2,126 | – | – | – | 1,866 | – | – | – | – | 3,992
NS | Guysborough |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,043 | 54.58% | 343 | 9.16% |  | Con | 1,700 | – | – | – | 2,043 | – | – | – | – | 3,743
NS | Halifax |  | Con |  | Con | 13,827 | 50.00% | 2 | 0.01% |  | Lib | 13,827 | – | – | – | 13,825 | – | – | – | – | 27,652
NS | Hants |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,191 | 51.00% | 86 | 2.00% |  | Lib | 2,191 | – | – | – | 2,105 | – | – | – | – | 4,296
NS | Inverness |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,928 | 58.84% | 1,008 | 20.26% |  | Con | 1,920 | – | – | – | 2,928 | – | – | – | 128 | 4,976
NS | Kings |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,474 | 51.57% | 151 | 3.15% |  | Lib | 2,474 | – | – | – | 2,323 | – | – | – | – | 4,797
NS | Lunenburg |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,645 | 52.96% | 408 | 5.93% |  | Lib | 3,645 | – | – | – | 3,237 | – | – | – | – | 6,882
NS | North Cape Breton and Victoria |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,418 | 54.94% | 615 | 9.89% |  | Con | 2,803 | – | – | – | 3,418 | – | – | – | – | 6,221
NS | Pictou |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,221 | 51.74% | 284 | 3.48% |  | Con | 3,937 | – | – | – | 4,221 | – | – | – | – | 8,158
NS | Richmond |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,268 | 56.33% | 285 | 12.66% |  | Con | 983 | – | – | – | 1,268 | – | – | – | – | 2,251
NS | Shelburne and Queen's |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,678 | 51.43% | 149 | 2.86% |  | Lib | 2,678 | – | – | – | 2,529 | – | – | – | – | 5,207
NS | Yarmouth |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,399 | 66.38% | 1,184 | 32.76% |  | Con | 1,215 | – | – | – | 2,399 | – | – | – | – | 3,614
ON | Algoma East |  | Con |  | Con | 3,898 | 51.20% | 182 | 2.39% |  | Lib | 3,898 | – | – | – | 3,716 | – | – | – | – | 7,614
ON | Algoma West |  | Con |  | Con | 2,738 | 55.67% | 558 | 11.35% |  | Lib | 2,738 | – | – | – | 2,180 | – | – | – | – | 4,918
ON | Brant |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,795 | 51.86% | 129 | 3.73% |  | Lib | 1,795 | – | – | – | 1,666 | – | – | – | – | 3,461
ON | Brantford |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,159 | 56.42% | 719 | 12.84% |  | Lib | 3,159 | – | – | – | 2,440 | – | – | – | – | 5,599
ON | Brockville |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,251 | 51.26% | 111 | 2.53% |  | Lib | 2,251 | – | – | – | 2,140 | – | – | – | – | 4,391
ON | Bruce North |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,526 | 50.82% | 82 | 1.65% |  | Lib | 2,526 | – | – | – | 2,444 | – | – | – | – | 4,970
ON | Bruce South |  | Con |  | Con | 2,878 | 50.91% | 103 | 1.82% |  | Lib | 2,878 | – | – | – | 2,775 | – | – | – | – | 5,653
ON | Carleton |  | Con |  | Con | 2,616 | 66.14% | 1,277 | 32.29% |  | Lib | 2,616 | – | – | – | 1,339 | – | – | – | – | 3,955
ON | Dufferin |  | Con |  | Con | 2,496 | 70.65% | 1,459 | 41.30% |  | Lib | 2,496 | – | – | – | 1,037 | – | – | – | – | 3,533
ON | Dundas |  | Con |  | Con | 2,262 | 58.30% | 644 | 16.60% |  | Lib | 2,262 | – | – | – | 1,618 | – | – | – | – | 3,880
ON | Durham |  | Con |  | Con | 3,291 | 56.18% | 724 | 12.36% |  | Lib | 3,291 | – | – | – | 2,567 | – | – | – | – | 5,858
ON | Elgin East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,313 | 54.66% | 394 | 9.31% |  | Lib | 2,313 | – | – | – | 1,919 | – | – | – | – | 4,232
ON | Elgin West |  | Con |  | Con | 3,629 | 57.05% | 897 | 14.10% |  | Lib | 3,629 | – | – | – | 2,732 | – | – | – | – | 6,361
ON | Essex North |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,616 | 51.25% | 176 | 2.49% |  | Lib | 3,616 | – | – | – | 3,440 | – | – | – | – | 7,056
ON | Essex South |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,946 | 51.77% | 201 | 3.53% |  | Con | 2,745 | – | – | – | 2,946 | – | – | – | – | 5,691
ON | Frontenac |  | Con |  | Con | 2,629 | 59.68% | 853 | 19.36% |  | Lib | 2,629 | – | – | – | 1,776 | – | – | – | – | 4,405
ON | Glengarry |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,175 | 52.74% | 226 | 5.48% |  | Con | 1,949 | – | – | – | 2,175 | – | – | – | – | 4,124
ON | Grenville |  | Con |  | Con | 2,286 | 62.48% | 913 | 24.95% |  | Ind | 2,286 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,373[a 3] | 3,659
ON | Grey East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,560 | 63.44% | 1,085 | 26.89% |  | Lib | 2,560 | – | – | – | 1,475 | – | – | – | – | 4,035
ON | Grey North |  | Con |  | Con | 3,326 | 52.79% | 352 | 5.59% |  | Lib | 3,326 | – | – | – | 2,974 | – | – | – | – | 6,300
ON | Grey South |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,139 | 50.57% | 48 | 1.13% |  | Lib | 2,139 | – | – | – | 2,091 | – | – | – | – | 4,230
ON | Haldimand |  | Con |  | Con | 2,817 | 56.85% | 679 | 13.70% |  | Lib | 2,817 | – | – | – | 2,138 | – | – | – | – | 4,955
ON | Halton |  | Con |  | Con | 2,618 | 54.35% | 419 | 8.70% |  | Lib | 2,618 | – | – | – | 2,199 | – | – | – | – | 4,817
ON | Hamilton East |  | Con |  | Con | 4,981 | 67.43% | 2,575 | 34.86% |  | Lib | 4,981 | – | – | – | 2,406 | – | – | – | – | 7,387
ON | Hamilton West |  | Con |  | Con | 4,390 | 58.67% | 1,820 | 24.33% |  | Lib | 4,390 | – | – | – | 2,570 | – | – | – | 522 | 7,482
ON | Hastings East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,899 | 61.26% | 1,066 | 22.53% |  | Lib | 2,899 | – | – | – | 1,833 | – | – | – | – | 4,732
ON | Hastings West |  | Con |  | Con | 3,623 | 66.17% | 1,771 | 32.35% |  | Lib | 3,623 | – | – | – | 1,852 | – | – | – | – | 5,475
ON | Huron East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,020 | 52.58% | 198 | 5.15% |  | Lib | 2,020 | – | – | – | 1,822 | – | – | – | – | 3,842
ON | Huron South |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,360 | 51.24% | 114 | 2.48% |  | Lib | 2,360 | – | – | – | 2,246 | – | – | – | – | 4,606
ON | Huron West |  | Con |  | Con | 2,024 | 52.26% | 175 | 4.52% |  | Lib | 2,024 | – | – | – | 1,849 | – | – | – | – | 3,873
ON | Kent East |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,604 | 52.87% | 283 | 5.75% |  | Con | 2,321 | – | – | – | 2,604 | – | – | – | – | 4,925
ON | Kent West |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,671 | 50.45% | 66 | 0.91% |  | Con | 3,605 | – | – | – | 3,671 | – | – | – | – | 7,276
ON | Kingston |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,322 | 54.01% | 345 | 8.03% |  | Lib | 2,322 | – | – | – | 1,977 | – | – | – | – | 4,299
ON | Lambton East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,720 | 54.99% | 494 | 9.99% |  | Lib | 2,720 | – | – | – | 2,226 | – | – | – | – | 4,946
ON | Lambton West |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,139 | 50.72% | 89 | 1.44% |  | Con | 3,050 | – | – | – | 3,139 | – | – | – | – | 6,189
ON | Lanark North |  | Con |  | Con | 1,613 | 53.78% | 227 | 7.57% |  | Lib | 1,613 | – | – | – | 1,386 | – | – | – | – | 2,999
ON | Lanark South |  | Con |  | Con | 2,234 | 67.68% | 1,167 | 35.35% |  | Lib | 2,234 | – | – | – | 1,067 | – | – | – | – | 3,301
ON | Leeds |  | Con |  | Con | 2,392 | 62.23% | 940 | 24.45% |  | Lib | 2,392 | – | – | – | 1,452 | – | – | – | – | 3,844
ON | Lennox and Addington |  | Con |  | Con | 2,580 | 56.41% | 586 | 12.81% |  | Lib | 2,580 | – | – | – | 1,994 | – | – | – | – | 4,574
ON | Lincoln |  | Con |  | Con | 4,576 | 60.22% | 1,553 | 20.44% |  | Lib | 4,576 | – | – | – | 3,023 | – | – | – | – | 7,599
ON | London |  | Con |  | Con | 5,263 | 61.09% | 1,911 | 22.18% |  | Ind | 5,263 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,352 | 8,615
ON | Middlesex East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,477 | 57.70% | 661 | 15.40% |  | Lib | 2,477 | – | – | – | 1,816 | – | – | – | – | 4,293
ON | Middlesex North |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,768 | 50.76% | 53 | 1.52% |  | Lib | 1,768 | – | – | – | 1,715 | – | – | – | – | 3,483
ON | Middlesex West |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,883 | 51.80% | 131 | 3.60% |  | Con | 1,752 | – | – | – | 1,883 | – | – | – | – | 3,635
ON | Muskoka |  | Con |  | Con | 2,282 | 64.39% | 1,020 | 28.78% |  | Lib | 2,282 | – | – | – | 1,262 | – | – | – | – | 3,544
ON | Nipissing |  | Con |  | Con | 5,872 | 52.43% | 545 | 4.87% |  | Lib | 5,872 | – | – | – | 5,327 | – | – | – | – | 11,199
ON | Norfolk |  | Con |  | Lib | 3,179 | 50.95% | 118 | 1.89% |  | Con | 3,061 | – | – | – | 3,179 | – | – | – | – | 6,240
ON | Northumberland East |  | Con |  | Con | 2,518 | 54.21% | 391 | 8.42% |  | Lib | 2,518 | – | – | – | 2,127 | – | – | – | – | 4,645
ON | Northumberland West |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,426 | 50.11% | 6 | 0.21% |  | Lib | 1,426 | – | – | – | 1,420 | – | – | – | – | 2,846
ON | Ontario North |  | Con |  | Con | 2,130 | 57.54% | 558 | 15.07% |  | Lib | 2,130 | – | – | – | 1,572 | – | – | – | – | 3,702
ON | Ontario South |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,917 | 53.39% | 370 | 6.77% |  | Lib | 2,917 | – | – | – | 2,547 | – | – | – | – | 5,464
ON | Ottawa (City of) |  | Lib |  | Con | 13,954 | 51.38% | 1,048 | 3.86% |  | Lib | 13,954 | – | – | – | 12,906 | – | 298 | – | – | 27,158
ON | Oxford North |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,898 | 52.68% | 295 | 5.36% |  | Con | 2,603 | – | – | – | 2,898 | – | – | – | – | 5,501
ON | Oxford South |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,503 | 50.24% | 24 | 0.48% |  | Lib | 2,503 | – | – | – | 2,479 | – | – | – | – | 4,982
ON | Parry Sound |  | Con |  | Con | 2,976 | 60.81% | 1,058 | 21.62% |  | Lib | 2,976 | – | – | – | 1,918 | – | – | – | – | 4,894
ON | Peel |  | Con |  | Con | 2,656 | 53.16% | 316 | 6.33% |  | Lib | 2,656 | – | – | – | 2,340 | – | – | – | – | 4,996
ON | Perth North |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,741 | 53.56% | 497 | 7.12% |  | Lib | 3,741 | – | – | – | 3,244 | – | – | – | – | 6,985
ON | Perth South |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,303 | 50.91% | 82 | 1.81% |  | Lib | 2,303 | – | – | – | 2,221 | – | – | – | – | 4,524
ON | Peterborough East |  | Con |  | Con | 1,992 | 58.74% | 593 | 17.49% |  | Lib | 1,992 | – | – | – | 1,399 | – | – | – | – | 3,391
ON | Peterborough West |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,944 | 50.36% | 42 | 0.72% |  | Lib | 2,944 | – | – | – | 2,902 | – | – | – | – | 5,846
ON | Prescott |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,532 | 67.48% | 1,312 | 34.97% |  | Nat-Con | – | – | – | 1,220[a 4] | 2,532 | – | – | – | – | 3,752
ON | Prince Edward |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,304 | 53.23% | 280 | 6.47% |  | Lib | 2,304 | – | – | – | 2,024 | – | – | – | – | 4,328
ON | Renfrew North |  | Con |  | Con | 2,573 | 57.98% | 708 | 15.95% |  | Lib | 2,573 | – | – | – | 1,865 | – | – | – | – | 4,438
ON | Renfrew South |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,687 | 56.51% | 619 | 13.02% |  | Con | 2,068 | – | – | – | 2,687 | – | – | – | – | 4,755
ON | Russell |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,812 | 57.34% | 976 | 14.68% |  | Con | 2,836 | – | – | – | 3,812 | – | – | – | – | 6,648
ON | Simcoe East |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,315 | 53.78% | 466 | 7.56% |  | Lib | 3,315 | – | – | – | 2,849 | – | – | – | – | 6,164
ON | Simcoe North |  | Con |  | Con | 2,648 | 51.68% | 172 | 3.36% |  | Lib | 2,648 | – | – | – | 2,476 | – | – | – | – | 5,124
ON | Simcoe South |  | Con |  | Con | 3,278 | 66.71% | 1,642 | 33.41% |  | Lib | 3,278 | – | – | – | 1,636 | – | – | – | – | 4,914
ON | Stormont |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,539 | 51.32% | 131 | 2.65% |  | Lib | 2,539 | – | – | – | 2,408 | – | – | – | – | 4,947
ON | Thunder Bay and Rainy River[a 5] |  | Lib |  | Con | acclaimed
ON | Toronto Centre |  | Con |  | Con | 5,156 | 63.26% | 2,162 | 26.53% |  | Lib | 5,156 | – | – | – | 2,994 | – | – | – | – | 8,150
ON | Toronto East |  | Ind |  | Con | 7,082 | 60.51% | 4,801 | 41.02% |  | Ind | 7,082 | – | – | – | 1,878 | 463 | – | – | 2,281 | 11,704
ON | Toronto North |  | Con |  | Con | 6,474 | 67.22% | 3,317 | 34.44% |  | Lib | 6,474 | – | – | – | 3,157 | – | – | – | – | 9,631
ON | Toronto South |  | Con |  | Con | 4,473 | 67.95% | 2,363 | 35.90% |  | Lib | 4,473 | – | – | – | 2,110 | – | – | – | – | 6,583
ON | Toronto West |  | Con |  | Con | 11,442 | 76.90% | 8,005 | 53.80% |  | Lib | 11,442 | – | – | – | 3,437 | – | – | – | – | 14,879
ON | Victoria |  | Lib-Con |  | Lib-Con | 4,001 | 59.65% | 1,294 | 19.29% |  | Ind | – | 4,001 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,707 | 6,708
ON | Waterloo North |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,774 | 52.18% | 315 | 4.36% |  | Lib | 3,774 | – | – | – | 3,459 | – | – | – | – | 7,233
ON | Waterloo South |  | Con |  | Con | 3,492 | 56.96% | 853 | 13.91% |  | Lib | 3,492 | – | – | – | 2,639 | – | – | – | – | 6,131
ON | Welland |  | Lib |  | Lib | acclaimed
ON | Wellington North |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,530 | 50.25% | 25 | 0.50% |  | Lib | 2,530 | – | – | – | 2,505 | – | – | – | – | 5,035
ON | Wellington South |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,368 | 55.10% | 624 | 10.21% |  | Con | 2,744 | – | – | – | 3,368 | – | – | – | – | 6,112
ON | Wentworth |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,832 | 56.59% | 893 | 13.19% |  | Lib | 3,832 | – | – | – | 2,939 | – | – | – | – | 6,771
ON | York Centre |  | Con |  | Con | 2,838 | 54.94% | 510 | 9.87% |  | Lib | 2,838 | – | – | – | 2,328 | – | – | – | – | 5,166
ON | York North |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,730 | 50.55% | 59 | 1.09% |  | Lib | 2,730 | – | – | – | 2,671 | – | – | – | – | 5,401
ON | York South |  | Ind-Con |  | Ind-Con | 7,194 | 79.10% | 5,293 | 58.20% |  | Ind | – | – | 7,194 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,901 | 9,095
PE | King's |  | Con |  | Lib | 2,538 | 50.14% | 14 | 0.28% |  | Con | 2,524 | – | – | – | 2,538 | – | – | – | – | 5,062
PE | Prince |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,529 | 50.83% | 115 | 1.66% |  | Con | 3,414 | – | – | – | 3,529 | – | – | – | – | 6,943
PE | Queen's |  | Lib |  | Con | 8,700 | 52.31% | 769 | 4.62% |  | Lib | 8,700 | – | – | – | 7,931 | – | – | – | – | 16,631
QC | Argenteuil |  | Con |  | Con | 1,824 | 59.78% | 597 | 19.57% |  | Lib | 1,824 | – | – | – | 1,227 | – | – | – | – | 3,051
QC | Bagot |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,845 | 51.32% | 95 | 2.64% |  | Con | 1,750 | – | – | – | 1,845 | – | – | – | – | 3,595
QC | Beauce |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,823 | 58.23% | 1,364 | 16.47% |  | Con | 3,459 | – | – | – | 4,823[a 6] | – | – | – | – | 8,282
QC | Beauharnois |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,876 | 50.36% | 27 | 0.72% |  | Con | 3,725[a 7] | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,725
QC | Bellechasse |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,742 | 50.67% | 46 | 1.34% |  | Lib | 1,742 | – | – | – | 1,696 | – | – | – | – | 3,438
QC | Berthier |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,638 | 45.09% | 26 | 0.72% |  | Lib | 1,638 | – | – | – | 1,612 | – | – | – | 383 | 3,633
QC | Bonaventure |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,444 | 63.66% | 1,049 | 27.32% |  | Con | 1,395 | – | – | – | 2,444 | – | – | – | – | 3,839
QC | Brome |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,520 | 50.40% | 24 | 0.80% |  | Lib | 1,520 | – | – | – | 1,496 | – | – | – | – | 3,016
QC | Chambly—Verchères |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,712 | 51.29% | 136 | 2.57% |  | Lib | 2,712 | – | – | – | 2,576 | – | – | – | – | 5,288
QC | Champlain |  | Con |  | Con | 3,811 | 52.53% | 367 | 5.06% |  | Lib | 3,811 | – | – | – | 3,444 | – | – | – | – | 7,255
QC | Charlevoix |  | Con |  | Con | 2,020 | 59.80% | 662 | 19.60% |  | Lib | 2,020[a 8] | – | – | – | 1,358 | – | – | – | – | 3,378
QC | Châteauguay |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,281 | 50.79% | 40 | 1.59% |  | Con | 1,241 | – | – | – | 1,281 | – | – | – | – | 2,522
QC | Chicoutimi—Saguenay |  | Con |  | Ind-Con | 3,798 | 38.59% | 1,275 | 12.96% |  | Lib | – | – | 3,798 | – | 2,523 | – | – | – | 3,520 | 9,841
QC | Compton |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,953 | 50.65% | 76 | 1.30% |  | Lib | 2,953 | – | – | – | 2,877 | – | – | – | – | 5,830
QC | Dorchester |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,506 | 53.66% | 342 | 7.32% |  | Lib | 2,506 | – | – | – | 2,164 | – | – | – | – | 4,670
QC | Drummond—Arthabaska |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,800 | 51.82% | 267 | 3.64% |  | Nat | – | – | – | – | 3,800 | – | – | 3,533 | – | 7,333
QC | Gaspé |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,470 | 56.52% | 570 | 13.04% |  | Lib | 2,470 | – | – | – | 1,900[a 9] | – | – | – | – | 4,370
QC | Hochelaga |  | Lib |  | Con | 7,178 | 55.29% | 1,373 | 10.58% |  | Ind | 7,178 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5,805 | 12,983
QC | Huntingdon |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,318 | 52.93% | 146 | 5.86% |  | Con | 1,172 | – | – | – | 1,318 | – | – | – | – | 2,490
QC | Jacques Cartier |  | Con |  | Con | 5,782 | 56.55% | 1,340 | 13.11% |  | Lib | 5,782 | – | – | – | 4,442 | – | – | – | – | 10,224
QC | Joliette |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,239 | 50.75% | 66 | 1.50% |  | Lib | 2,239 | – | – | – | 2,173 | – | – | – | – | 4,412
QC | Kamouraska |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,840 | 51.20% | 86 | 2.39% |  | Con | 1,754 | – | – | – | 1,840 | – | – | – | – | 3,594
QC | L'Assomption |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,508 | 55.50% | 299 | 11.00% |  | Con | 1,209 | – | – | – | 1,508 | – | – | – | – | 2,717
QC | L'Islet |  | Con |  | Con | 1,578 | 57.97% | 434 | 15.94% |  | Lib | 1,578 | – | – | – | 1,144 | – | – | – | – | 2,722
QC | Labelle |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,902 | 50.73% | 84 | 1.47% |  | Lib | 2,902 | – | – | – | 2,818 | – | – | – | – | 5,720
QC | Laprairie—Napierville |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,795 | 52.47% | 169 | 4.94% |  | Con | 1,626 | – | – | – | 1,795 | – | – | – | – | 3,421
QC | Laval |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,648 | 51.95% | 199 | 3.90% |  | Con | 2,449 | – | – | – | 2,648 | – | – | – | – | 5,097
QC | Lévis |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,800 | 58.69% | 829 | 17.38% |  | Con | 1,971 | – | – | – | 2,800 | – | – | – | – | 4,771
QC | Lotbinière |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,870 | 55.16% | 350 | 10.32% |  | Con | 1,520 | – | – | – | 1,870 | – | – | – | – | 3,390
QC | Maisonneuve |  | Labour |  | Labour | 11,538 | 55.24% | 2,189 | 10.48% |  | Con | 9,349 | – | – | – | – | 11,538 | – | – | – | 20,887
QC | Maskinongé |  | Lib |  | Ind-Con | 1,507 | 51.88% | 109 | 3.75% |  | Lib | – | – | 1,507 | – | 1,398 | – | – | – | – | 2,905
QC | Mégantic |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,986 | 53.27% | 367 | 6.55% |  | Ind | – | – | – | – | 2,986 | – | – | – | 2,619 | 5,605
QC | Missisquoi |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,002 | 52.66% | 202 | 5.31% |  | Con | 1,800 | – | – | – | 2,002 | – | – | – | – | 3,802
QC | Montcalm |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,432 | 51.03% | 58 | 2.07% |  | Con | 1,374 | – | – | – | 1,432[a 10] | – | – | – | – | 2,806
QC | Montmagny |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,653 | 55.45% | 325 | 10.90% |  | Lib | 1,653 | – | – | – | 1,328[a 6] | – | – | – | – | 2,981
QC | Montmorency |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,359 | 51.26% | 67 | 2.53% |  | Lib | 1,359[a 8] | – | – | – | 1,292 | – | – | – | – | 2,651
QC | Nicolet |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,805 | 50.76% | 84 | 1.52% |  | Lib | 2,805 | – | – | – | 2,721 | – | – | – | – | 5,526
QC | Pontiac |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,059 | 44.59% | 666 | 14.42% |  | Lib | 2,059 | – | – | – | 2,559[a 11] | – | – | – | – | 4,618
QC | Portneuf |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,868 | 57.67% | 763 | 15.34% |  | Con | 2,105 | – | – | – | 2,868 | – | – | – | – | 4,973
QC | Quebec County |  | Lib |  | Con | 2,295 | 50.53% | 48 | 1.06% |  | Lib | 2,295 | – | – | – | 2,247 | – | – | – | – | 4,542
QC | Quebec East |  | Lib |  | Lib | acclaimed
QC | Quebec West |  | Con |  | Lib | 1,219 | 51.94% | 91 | 3.88% |  | Con | 1,128 | – | – | – | 1,219 | – | – | – | – | 2,347
QC | Quebec-Centre |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,122 | 58.12% | 593 | 16.24% |  | Con | 1,529 | – | – | – | 2,122 | – | – | – | – | 3,651
QC | Richelieu |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,373 | 59.15% | 734 | 18.30% |  | Con | 1,639 | – | – | – | 2,373 | – | – | – | – | 4,012
QC | Richmond—Wolfe |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,855 | 53.80% | 544 | 7.59% |  | Con | 3,311 | – | – | – | 3,855 | – | – | – | – | 7,166
QC | Rimouski |  | Lib |  | Con | 4,179 | 52.73% | 432 | 5.45% |  | Lib | 4,179 | – | – | – | 3,747 | – | – | – | – | 7,926
QC | Rouville |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,467 | 55.23% | 278 | 10.47% |  | Con | 1,189 | – | – | – | 1,467[a 9] | – | – | – | – | 2,656
QC | Shefford |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,271 | 50.29% | 26 | 0.58% |  | Con | 2,245 | – | – | – | 2,271 | – | – | – | – | 4,516
QC | Town of Sherbrooke |  | Con |  | Lib | 2,321 | 50.42% | 39 | 0.85% |  | Con | 2,282 | – | – | – | 2,321 | – | – | – | – | 4,603
QC | Soulanges |  | Con |  | Lib | 1,045 | 53.64% | 142 | 7.29% |  | Con | 903 | – | – | – | 1,045[a 12] | – | – | – | – | 1,948
QC | St. Anne |  | Con |  | Con | 3,319 | 56.40% | 753 | 12.80% |  | Lib | 3,319 | – | – | – | 2,566 | – | – | – | – | 5,885
QC | St. Antoine |  | Con |  | Con | 4,677 | 63.68% | 2,009 | 27.35% |  | Lib | 4,677 | – | – | – | 2,668 | – | – | – | – | 7,345
QC | St. Hyacinthe |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,295 | 51.57% | 140 | 3.15% |  | Con | 2,155 | – | – | – | 2,295 | – | – | – | – | 4,450
QC | St. James |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,653 | 59.41% | 1,474 | 18.82% |  | Nat-Con | – | – | – | 3,179 | 4,653 | – | – | – | – | 7,832
QC | St. Johns—Iberville |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,638 | 78.35% | 1,909 | 56.70% |  | Con | 729 | – | – | – | 2,638 | – | – | – | – | 3,367
QC | St. Lawrence |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,469 | 54.18% | 1,048 | 12.70% |  | Con | 3,421 | – | – | – | 4,469 | – | 359 | – | – | 8,249
QC | St. Mary |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,089 | 62.82% | 2,177 | 26.87% |  | Con | 2,912 | – | – | – | 5,089 | 100 | – | – | – | 8,101
QC | Stanstead |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,310 | 52.31% | 204 | 4.62% |  | Con | 2,106 | – | – | – | 2,310 | – | – | – | – | 4,416
QC | Témiscouata |  | Lib |  | Lib | 2,913 | 51.89% | 212 | 3.78% |  | Con | 2,701 | – | – | – | 2,913 | – | – | – | – | 5,614
QC | Terrebonne |  | Con |  | Con | 2,727 | 56.48% | 626 | 12.97% |  | Lib | 2,727 | – | – | – | 2,101 | – | – | – | – | 4,828
QC | Three Rivers and St. Maurice |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,155 | 50.07% | 9 | 0.14% |  | Con | 3,146 | – | – | – | 3,155 | – | – | – | – | 6,301
QC | Two Mountains |  | Lib |  | Lib | acclaimed
QC | Vaudreuil |  | Lib |  | Lib | 1,345 | 54.34% | 215 | 8.69% |  | Con | 1,130 | – | – | – | 1,345 | – | – | – | – | 2,475
QC | Wright |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,003 | 58.68% | 1,184 | 17.36% |  | Con | 2,819 | – | – | – | 4,003 | – | – | – | – | 6,822
QC | Yamaska |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,870 | 51.28% | 93 | 2.55% |  | Lib | 1,870 | – | – | – | 1,777 | – | – | – | – | 3,647
SK | Assiniboia |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,804 | 61.86% | 2,226 | 23.73% |  | Con | 3,578 | – | – | – | 5,804 | – | – | – | – | 9,382
SK | Battleford |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,453 | 60.76% | 1,931 | 21.52% |  | Con | 3,522 | – | – | – | 5,453 | – | – | – | – | 8,975
SK | Humboldt |  | Lib |  | Lib | 7,265 | 71.14% | 4,318 | 42.28% |  | Con | 2,947 | – | – | – | 7,265 | – | – | – | – | 10,212
SK | Mackenzie |  | Lib |  | Lib | 4,090 | 70.17% | 2,351 | 40.33% |  | Con | 1,739 | – | – | – | 4,090 | – | – | – | – | 5,829
SK | Moose Jaw |  | Lib |  | Lib | 8,285 | 58.19% | 2,332 | 16.38% |  | Con | 5,953 | – | – | – | 8,285 | – | – | – | – | 14,238
SK | Prince Albert |  | Lib |  | Con | 3,316 | 52.83% | 355 | 5.66% |  | Lib | 3,316 | – | – | – | 2,961 | – | – | – | – | 6,277
SK | Qu'Appelle |  | Con |  | Lib | 4,298 | 52.59% | 424 | 5.19% |  | Con | 3,874 | – | – | – | 4,298 | – | – | – | – | 8,172
SK | Regina |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,811 | 54.63% | 1,730 | 16.26% |  | Con | 4,081 | – | – | – | 5,811 | – | – | – | 745 | 10,637
SK | Saltcoats |  | Lib |  | Lib | 3,619 | 65.17% | 1,685 | 30.34% |  | Con | 1,934 | – | – | – | 3,619 | – | – | – | – | 5,553
SK | Saskatoon |  | Lib |  | Lib | 5,328 | 54.70% | 1,572 | 16.14% |  | Con | 3,756 | – | – | – | 5,328 | – | – | – | 656 | 9,740
Terr | Yukon |  | Lib |  | Con | 1,285 | 60.79% | 456 | 21.57% |  | Lib | 1,285 | – | – | – | 829 | – | – | – | – | 2,114

1. ^ a b William Pugsley and John Waterhouse Daniel swapped seats.
2. ^ James William Maddin previously campaigned as a Liberal-Conservative, but lost in 1911 as a Liberal. William F. Carroll was the winning Liberal candidate.
3. ^ Samuel John Martin campaigned as a Liberal in 1908.
4. ^ Eugène-Grégoire Quesnel campaigned as an Independent in 1908.
5. ^ Election had been postponed to October 12.
6. ^ a b Henri Sévérin Béland, incumbent in Beauce, campaigned in both Beauce (won) and Montmagny (lost).
7. ^ Louis-Joseph Papineau, previously elected as a Liberal in 1908, was reelected as a Conservative in 1911. The other Conservative candidate, Joseph-Gédéon-Horace Bergeron, had been previously elected to the House of Commons.
8. ^ a b Rodolphe Forget, incumbent in Charlevoix, campaigned and won in both Charlevoix and Montmorency.
9. ^ a b Rodolphe Lemieux, incumbent in Gaspé, campaigned in Gaspé (lost) and Rouville (won).
10. ^ David Arthur Lafortune was originally elected as an Independent Liberal in a 1909 byelection.
11. ^ George Frederick Hodgins, the Liberal incumbent, came in at 3rd place.
12. ^ Wilfrid Laurier was also acclaimed in Quebec East.

= open seat
= winning candidate was in previous House
= not incumbent; was previously elected as an MP
= incumbent had switched allegiance
= incumbency arose from byelection gain
= previously incumbent in another riding
= other incumbents renominated
= campaigned in two ridings
= Previously a member of one of the provincial/territorial legislatures
= multiple candidates
= two-member districts
= overlapping districts
= election postponed to a later date
Results - multiple-member ridings  Name  | MPs  | 1908  | 1911  | Notes

|
|
|
|

Halifax  | 2 |

| Robert Borden reelected; Alexander Kenneth Maclean won a seat for the Liberals.
Ottawa (City of)  | 2 |

| Harold McGiverin defeated; Albert Allard chose not to stand for reelection.
Queen's  | 2 |

| Both incumbents defeated.

### Comparative analysis for ridings (1911 vs 1908)

[edit]

Summary of riding results by vote share for winning candidate and swing (vs 1908)[14][15] Riding and winning party  | Vote share[a 1] | Swing[a 2]

|
|

%  | Change (pp)  | To  | Change (pp)
|  |  |  |  |  |  |
AB | Calgary |  | Con | Hold | 58.15 | 8.49 |  | 8.49

| Con | 6.71 |  | 6.71

AB | Edmonton |  | Lib | Hold | 56.76 | -7.53 |

|  | Con | -5.31 |

AB | Macleod |  | Lib | Gain | 49.44 | 7.09 |  | 7.09

| Lib | -7.88 |

AB | Medicine Hat |  | Lib | Gain | 56.49 | 9.70 |  | 9.7

| Lib | -9.70 |

AB | Red Deer |  | Lib | Hold | 63.35 | 11.41 |  | 11.41

| Lib | 11.41 |  | 11.41

AB | Strathcona |  | Lib | Hold | 65.26 | 15.12 |  | 15.12

| Lib | 6.84 |  | 6.84

AB | Victoria |  | Lib | Hold | 48.53 | -5.23 |

|  | Lib | 0.18 |  | 0.18

BC | Comox—Atlin |  | Con | Gain | 52.74 | acclamation in 1908
BC | Kootenay |  | Con | Hold | 57.51 | 10.54 |  | 10.54

| Con | 0.44 |  | 0.44

BC | Nanaimo |  | Con | Gain | 58.21 | 25.98 |  | 25.98

| Con | -10.13 |

BC | New Westminster |  | Con | Hold | 65.70 | 7.21 |  | 7.21

| Con | 7.21 |  | 7.21

BC | Vancouver City |  | Con | Hold | 58.72 | 16.61 |  | 16.61

| Con | 6.00 |  | 6

BC | Victoria City |  | Con | Hold | 51.78 | 1.63 |  | 1.63

| Con | 4.30 |  | 4.3

BC | Yale—Cariboo |  | Con | Hold | 63.56 | 10.42 |  | 10.42

| Con | 8.64 |  | 8.64

MB | Brandon |  | Con | Gain | 55.41 | 6.59 |  | 6.59

| Con | -5.89 |

MB | Dauphin |  | Lib | Gain | 55.67 | 7.42 |  | 7.42

| Lib | -7.42 |

MB | Lisgar |  | Con | Hold | 50.30 | -1.24 |

|  | Lib | -1.24 |

MB | Macdonald |  | Con | Hold | 51.40 | -3.93 |

|  | Lib | -3.93 |

MB | Marquette |  | Con | Hold | 50.94 | -3.81 |

|  | Lib | -3.81 |

MB | Portage la Prairie |  | Con | Hold | 55.76 | 3.69 |  | 3.69

| Con | 3.69 |  | 3.69

MB | Provencher |  | Lib | Hold | 53.33 | -1.29 |

|  | Con | -1.29 |

MB | Selkirk |  | Con | Hold | 48.84 | -2.03 |

|  | Lib | -0.18 |

MB | Souris |  | Con | Hold | 50.51 | -7.16 |

|  | Lib | -7.16 |

MB | Winnipeg |  | Con | Hold | 55.15 | 5.03 |  | 5.03

| Con | 4.39 |  | 4.39

NB | Carleton |  | Lib | Hold | 50.11 | -1.37 |

|  | Con | -1.37 |

NB | Charlotte |  | Con | Gain | 51.89 | 3.82 |  | 3.82

| Con | -3.82 |

NB | Gloucester |  | Lib | Hold | 59.27 | 4.06 |  | 4.06

| Lib | 4.06 |  | 4.06

NB | Kent |  | Con | Gain | 52.30 | 10.40 |  | 10.4

| Con | -10.40 |

NB | King's and Albert |  | Con | Gain | 52.33 | 4.93 |  | 4.93

| Con | -4.93 |

NB | Northumberland |  | Lib | Hold | 53.34 | -5.63 |

|  | Con | -5.63 |

NB | Restigouche |  | Lib | Hold | 56.38 | 3.58 |  | 3.58

| Lib | 3.58 |  | 3.58

NB | City and County of St. John |  | Con | Gain | 50.51 | 2.83 |  | 2.83

| Con | -2.83 |

NB | City of St. John |  | Lib | Gain | 50.38 | 1.49 |  | 1.49

| Lib | -1.49 |

NB | Sunbury—Queen's |  | Lib | Hold | 50.12 | -0.55 |

|  | Con | -0.55 |

NB | Victoria |  | Lib | Hold | 73.36 | -4.84 |

|  | Lib | 7.38 |  | 7.38

NB | Westmorland |  | Lib | Hold | 50.36 | -7.59 |

|  | N/A[a 3]
NB | York |  | Con | Hold | 62.61 | 5.86 |  | 5.86

| N/A[a 3]
NS | Annapolis |  | Con | Gain | 50.15 | 2.77 |  | 2.77

| Con | -2.77 |

NS | Antigonish |  | Lib | Hold | 59.80 | 9.41 |  | 9.41

| Lib | 9.41 |  | 9.41

NS | Cape Breton South |  | Lib | Gain | 49.42 | 0.56 |  | 0.56

| Lib | -1.65 |

NS | Colchester |  | Con | Hold | 56.38 | 5.30 |  | 5.3

| Con | 5.30 |  | 5.3

NS | Cumberland |  | Con | Hold | 51.83 | -0.86 |

|  | Lib | -0.86 |

NS | Digby |  | Con | Hold | 53.26 | 1.34 |  | 1.34

| Con | 1.34 |  | 1.34

NS | Guysborough |  | Lib | Hold | 54.58 | 1.88 |  | 1.88

| Lib | 1.88 |  | 1.88

NS | Halifax |  | Con | Hold | 50.00 | -2.61 |

|  | Lib | -2.61 |

NS | Hants |  | Con | Gain | 51.00 | 2.60 |  | 2.6

| Con | -2.60 |

NS | Inverness |  | Lib | Hold | 58.84 | -5.95 |

|  | Con | -4.67 |

NS | Kings |  | Con | Gain | 51.57 | 7.06 |  | 7.06

| Con | -7.06 |

NS | Lunenburg |  | Con | Gain | 52.96 | 4.43 |  | 4.43

| Con | -4.43 |

NS | North Cape Breton and Victoria |  | Lib | Hold | 54.94 | 4.79 |  | 4.79

| Lib | 4.79 |  | 4.79

NS | Pictou |  | Lib | Hold | 51.74 | -0.04 |

|  | Con | -0.04 |

NS | Richmond |  | Lib | Hold | 56.33 | 1.15 |  | 1.15

| Lib | 1.15 |  | 1.15

NS | Shelburne and Queen's |  | Con | Gain | 51.43 | 5.12 |  | 5.12

| Con | -5.12 |

NS | Yarmouth |  | Lib | Hold | 66.38 | 5.14 |  | 5.14

| Lib | 5.14 |  | 5.14

ON | Algoma East |  | Con | Hold | 51.20 | 0.83 |  | 0.83

| Con | 0.83 |  | 0.83

ON | Algoma West |  | Con | Hold | 55.67 | 3.03 |  | 3.03

| Con | 3.03 |  | 3.03

ON | Brant |  | Con | Gain | 51.86 | 5.52 |  | 5.52

| Con | -5.52 |

ON | Brantford |  | Con | Gain | 56.42 | 8.30 |  | 8.3

| Con | -8.30 |

ON | Brockville |  | Con | Gain | 51.26 | 3.00 |  | 3

| Con | -3.00 |

ON | Bruce North |  | Con | Gain | 50.82 | N/A[a 4] | Con | -4.08 |

ON | Bruce South |  | Con | Hold | 50.91 | -0.75 |

|  | Lib | -0.75 |

ON | Carleton |  | Con | Hold | 66.14 | -1.14 |

|  | Con | 6.77 |  | 6.77

ON | Dufferin |  | Con | Hold | 70.65 | -3.11 |

|  | Lib | -3.11 |

ON | Dundas |  | Con | Hold | 58.30 | 2.76 |  | 2.76

| Con | 2.76 |  | 2.76

ON | Durham |  | Con | Hold | 56.18 | 1.12 |  | 1.12

| Con | 1.12 |  | 1.12

ON | Elgin East |  | Con | Hold | 54.66 | 1.77 |  | 1.77

| Con | 1.77 |  | 1.77

ON | Elgin West |  | Con | Hold | 57.05 | 2.73 |  | 2.73

| Con | 2.73 |  | 2.73

ON | Essex North |  | Con | Gain | 51.25 | 5.84 |  | 5.84

| Con | -5.84 |

ON | Essex South |  | Lib | Hold | 51.77 | -4.31 |

|  | Con | -4.31 |

ON | Frontenac |  | Con | Hold | 59.68 | 4.47 |  | 4.47

| N/A[a 3]
ON | Glengarry |  | Lib | Hold | 52.74 | -1.05 |

|  | Con | -1.05 |

ON | Grenville |  | Con | Hold | 62.48 | 4.78 |  | 4.78

| Con | 4.78 |  | 4.78

ON | Grey East |  | Con | Hold | 63.44 | -2.09 |

|  | Lib | -2.09 |

ON | Grey North |  | Con | Hold | 52.79 | 1.51 |  | 1.51

| Con | 1.51 |  | 1.51

ON | Grey South |  | Con | Gain | 50.57 | 1.55 |  | 1.55

| Con | -1.55 |

ON | Haldimand |  | Con | Hold | 56.85 | 4.41 |  | 4.41

| Con | 4.41 |  | 4.41

ON | Halton |  | Con | Hold | 54.35 | 2.06 |  | 2.06

| Con | 2.06 |  | 2.06

ON | Hamilton East |  | Con | Hold | 67.43 | 19.28 |  | 19.28

| Con | 8.57 |  | 8.57

ON | Hamilton West |  | Con | Hold | 58.67 | 5.56 |  | 5.56

| Con | 9.05 |  | 9.05

ON | Hastings East |  | Con | Hold | 61.26 | -4.08 |

|  | Lib | -4.08 |

ON | Hastings West |  | Con | Hold | 66.17 | 5.73 |  | 5.73

| Con | 5.73 |  | 5.73

ON | Huron East |  | Con | Hold | 52.58 | 1.61 |  | 1.61

| Con | 1.61 |  | 1.61

ON | Huron South |  | Con | Gain | 51.24 | 2.77 |  | 2.77

| Con | -2.77 |

ON | Huron West |  | Con | Hold | 52.26 | 1.52 |  | 1.52

| Con | 1.52 |  | 1.52

ON | Kent East |  | Lib | Hold | 52.87 | -1.77 |

|  | Con | -1.77 |

ON | Kent West |  | Lib | Hold | 50.45 | -0.09 |

|  | Con | -0.09 |

ON | Kingston |  | Con | Gain | 54.01 | 8.27 |  | 8.27

| Con | -8.27 |

ON | Lambton East |  | Con | Hold | 54.99 | 0.72 |  | 0.72

| Con | 0.72 |  | 0.72

ON | Lambton West |  | Lib | Hold | 50.72 | -0.45 |

|  | Con | -0.45 |

ON | Lanark North |  | Con | Hold | 53.78 | 3.69 |  | 3.69

| Con | 3.69 |  | 3.69

ON | Lanark South |  | Con | Hold | 67.68 | 6.70 |  | 6.7

| Con | 6.70 |  | 6.7

ON | Leeds |  | Con | Hold | 62.23 | 0.03 |  | 0.03

| Con | 0.03 |  | 0.03

ON | Lennox and Addington |  | Con | Hold | 56.41 | 4.78 |  | 4.78

| Con | 4.78 |  | 4.78

ON | Lincoln |  | Con | Hold | 60.22 | 8.55 |  | 8.55

| Con | 8.55 |  | 8.55

ON | London |  | Con | Hold | 61.09 | 3.11 |  | 3.11

| Con | 3.11 |  | 3.11

ON | Middlesex East |  | Con | Hold | 57.70 | 4.93 |  | 4.93

| Con | 4.93 |  | 4.93

ON | Middlesex North |  | Con | Gain | 50.76 | 1.63 |  | 1.63

| Con | -1.63 |

ON | Middlesex West |  | Lib | Hold | 51.80 | 1.64 |  | 1.64

| Lib | 1.64 |  | 1.64

ON | Muskoka |  | Con | Hold | 64.39 | 4.90 |  | 4.9

| Con | 4.90 |  | 4.9

ON | Nipissing |  | Con | Hold | 52.43 | 2.31 |  | 2.31

| Con | 2.31 |  | 2.31

ON | Norfolk |  | Lib | Gain | 50.95 | 4.23 |  | 4.23

| Lib | -4.23 |

ON | Northumberland East |  | Con | Hold | 54.21 | 2.12 |  | 2.12

| Con | 2.12 |  | 2.12

ON | Northumberland West |  | Con | Gain | 50.11 | 2.47 |  | 2.47

| Con | -2.47 |

ON | Ontario North |  | Con | Hold | 57.54 | 5.16 |  | 5.16

| Con | 5.16 |  | 5.16

ON | Ontario South |  | Con | Gain | 53.39 | 5.54 |  | 5.54

| Con | -5.54 |

ON | Ottawa (City of) |  | Con | Gain | 51.38 | 3.64 |  | 3.64

| Con | -4.19 |

ON | Oxford North |  | Lib | Hold | 52.68 | 1.49 |  | 1.49

| Lib | 1.49 |  | 1.49

ON | Oxford South |  | Con | Gain | 50.24 | 1.11 |  | 1.11

| Con | -1.11 |

ON | Parry Sound |  | Con | Hold | 60.81 | 2.94 |  | 2.94

| Con | 2.94 |  | 2.94

ON | Peel |  | Con | Hold | 53.16 | 0.40 |  | 0.4

| Con | 0.40 |  | 0.4

ON | Perth North |  | Con | Gain | 53.56 | 3.85 |  | 3.85

| Con | -3.85 |

ON | Perth South |  | Con | Gain | 50.91 | 1.21 |  | 1.21

| Con | -1.21 |

ON | Peterborough East |  | Con | Hold | 58.74 | 3.23 |  | 3.23

| Con | 3.23 |  | 3.23

ON | Peterborough West |  | Con | Gain | 50.36 | 3.46 |  | 3.46

| Con | -3.46 |

ON | Prescott |  | Lib | Hold | 67.48 | -2.77 |

|  | Nat-Con | -2.77 |

ON | Prince Edward |  | Con | Gain | 53.23 | 4.74 |  | 4.74

| Con | -4.74 |

ON | Renfrew North |  | Con | Hold | 57.98 | 1.15 |  | 1.15

| Con | 1.15 |  | 1.15

ON | Renfrew South |  | Lib | Hold | 56.51 | -0.75 |

|  | Con | -0.75 |

ON | Russell |  | Lib | Hold | 57.34 | -2.07 |

|  | Con | -2.07 |

ON | Simcoe East |  | Con | Gain | 53.78 | 5.79 |  | 5.79

| Con | -5.79 |

ON | Simcoe North |  | Con | Hold | 51.68 | 1.21 |  | 1.21

| Con | 1.21 |  | 1.21

ON | Simcoe South |  | Con | Hold | 66.71 | -1.82 |

|  | Lib | -1.82 |

ON | Stormont |  | Con | Gain | 51.32 | 11.26 |  | 11.26

| Con | -4.77 |

ON | Thunder Bay and Rainy River |  | Con | Gain | acclaimed
ON | Toronto Centre |  | Con | Hold | 63.26 | 11.88 |  | 11.88

| Con | 11.88 |  | 11.88

ON | Toronto East |  | Con | Gain | 60.51 | 15.95 |  | 15.95

| Con | -25.95 |

ON | Toronto North |  | Con | Hold | 67.22 | 14.91 |  | 14.91

| Con | 14.91 |  | 14.91

ON | Toronto South |  | Con | Hold | 67.95 | 6.27 |  | 6.27

| N/A[a 3]
ON | Toronto West |  | Con | Hold | 76.90 | 10.54 |  | 10.54

| N/A[a 3]
ON | Victoria |  | Lib-Con | Hold | 59.65 | 2.81 |  | 2.81

| Lib-Con | 4.35 |  | 4.35

ON | Waterloo North |  | Con | Gain | 52.18 | 4.50 |  | 4.5

| Con | -4.13 |

ON | Waterloo South |  | Con | Hold | 56.96 | 5.24 |  | 5.24

| Con | 5.24 |  | 5.24

ON | Welland |  | Lib | Hold | acclaimed
ON | Wellington North |  | Con | Gain | 50.25 | 1.05 |  | 1.05

| Con | -1.05 |

ON | Wellington South |  | Lib | Hold | 55.10 | 0.13 |  | 0.13

| Lib | 0.13 |  | 0.13

ON | Wentworth |  | Con | Gain | 56.59 | 9.35 |  | 9.35

| Con | -9.35 |

ON | York Centre |  | Con | Hold | 54.94 | 4.50 |  | 4.5

| Con | 4.50 |  | 4.5

ON | York North |  | Con | Gain | 50.55 | 3.38 |  | 3.38

| Con | -3.38 |

ON | York South |  | Ind-Con | Hold | 79.10 | acclamation in 1908
PE | King's |  | Lib | Gain | 50.14 | 1.90 |  | 1.9

| Lib | -1.90 |

PE | Prince |  | Lib | Hold | 50.83 | -0.36 |

|  | Con | -0.36 |

PE | Queen's |  | Con | Gain | 52.31 | 2.99 |  | 2.99

| Con | -2.99 |

QC | Argenteuil |  | Con | Hold | 59.78 | 5.34 |  | 5.34

| Con | 5.34 |  | 5.34

QC | Bagot |  | Lib | Hold | 51.32 | -3.53 |

|  | Con | -3.53 |

QC | Beauce |  | Lib | Hold | 58.23 | -37.47 |

|  | Con | -37.47 |

QC | Beauharnois |  | Con | Gain | 50.36 | 0.76 |  | 0.76

| Con | -25.58 |

QC | Bellechasse |  | Con | Gain | 50.67 | 26.69 |  | 26.69

| Con | -26.69 |

QC | Berthier |  | Con | Gain | 45.09 | -1.14 |

|  | Con | -4.13 |

QC | Bonaventure |  | Lib | Hold | 63.66 | -4.09 |

|  | Con | -4.09 |

QC | Brome |  | Con | Gain | 50.40 | 8.52 |  | 8.52

| Con | -7.89 |

QC | Chambly—Verchères |  | Con | Gain | 51.29 | 11.24 |  | 11.24

| Con | -11.24 |

QC | Champlain |  | Con | Hold | 52.53 | 1.82 |  | 1.82

| Con | 1.82 |  | 1.82

QC | Charlevoix |  | Con | Hold | 59.80 | 6.94 |  | 6.94

| Con | 6.94 |  | 6.94

QC | Châteauguay |  | Lib | Hold | 50.79 | -5.33 |

|  | Con | -5.33 |

QC | Chicoutimi—Saguenay |  | Ind-Con | Gain | 38.59 | N/A[a 4] | Ind | -11.61 |

QC | Compton |  | Con | Gain | 50.65 | 3.96 |  | 3.96

| Con | -3.96 |

QC | Dorchester |  | Con | Gain | 53.66 | 5.70 |  | 5.7

| Con | -5.70 |

QC | Drummond—Arthabaska |  | Lib | Hold | 51.82 | -4.43 |

|  | N/A[a 3]
QC | Gaspé |  | Con | Gain | 56.52 | 34.84 |  | 34.84

| Con | -34.84 |

QC | Hochelaga |  | Con | Gain | 55.29 | 6.30 |  | 6.3

| Con | -28.66 |

QC | Huntingdon |  | Lib | Hold | 52.93 | 1.33 |  | 1.33

| Lib | 1.33 |  | 1.33

QC | Jacques Cartier |  | Con | Hold | 56.55 | -0.10 |

|  | Lib | -0.10 |

QC | Joliette |  | Con | Gain | 50.75 | 4.74 |  | 4.74

| Con | -4.74 |

QC | Kamouraska |  | Lib | Hold | 51.20 | -3.41 |

|  | Con | -3.41 |

QC | L'Assomption |  | Lib | Hold | 55.50 | -6.30 |

|  | Con | -6.30 |

QC | L'Islet |  | Con | Hold | 57.97 | 4.72 |  | 4.72

| Con | 4.72 |  | 4.72

QC | Labelle |  | Con | Gain | 50.73 | 15.24 |  | 15.24

| Con | -15.24 |

QC | Laprairie—Napierville |  | Lib | Hold | 52.47 | -3.08 |

|  | Con | -3.08 |

QC | Laval |  | Lib | Hold | 51.95 | 1.15 |  | 1.15

| Lib | 1.15 |  | 1.15

QC | Lévis |  | Lib | Hold | 58.69 | -4.00 |

|  | N/A[a 3]
QC | Lotbinière |  | Lib | Hold | 55.16 | -6.07 |

|  | Con | -6.07 |

QC | Maisonneuve |  | Labour | Hold | 55.24 | -16.23 |

|  | N/A[a 3]
QC | Maskinongé |  | Ind-Con | Gain | 51.88 | N/A[a 5]
QC | Mégantic |  | Lib | Hold | 53.27 | -0.94 |

|  | N/A[a 3]
QC | Missisquoi |  | Lib | Hold | 52.66 | 3.08 |  | 3.08

| Lib | 2.42 |  | 2.42

QC | Montcalm |  | Lib | Hold | 51.03 | -2.24 |

|  | Con | -2.24 |

QC | Montmagny |  | Con | Gain | 55.45 | 8.47 |  | 8.47

| Con | -8.47 |

QC | Montmorency |  | Con | Gain | 51.26 | 7.66 |  | 7.66

| Con | -7.66 |

QC | Nicolet |  | Con | Gain | 50.76 | 7.74 |  | 7.74

| Con | -7.74 |

QC | Pontiac |  | Con | Gain | 44.59 | 3.15 |  | 3.15

| Con | -15.78 |

QC | Portneuf |  | Lib | Hold | 57.67 | 0.70 |  | 0.7

| Con | -0.78 |

QC | Quebec County |  | Con | Gain | 50.53 | N/A[a 6]
QC | Quebec East |  | Lib | Hold | acclaimed
QC | Quebec West |  | Lib | Gain | 51.94 | 2.18 |  | 2.18

| Lib | -2.18 |

QC | Quebec-Centre |  | Lib | Hold | 58.12 | -6.23 |

|  | Con | -6.23 |

QC | Richelieu |  | Lib | Hold | 59.15 | -3.88 |

|  | Con | -3.88 |

QC | Richmond—Wolfe |  | Lib | Hold | 53.80 | -2.18 |

|  | Con | -2.18 |

QC | Rimouski |  | Con | Gain | 52.73 | 7.00 |  | 7

| Con | -7.00 |

QC | Rouville |  | Lib | Hold | 55.23 | acclamation in 1908
QC | Shefford |  | Lib | Hold | 50.29 | -3.03 |

|  | Con | -3.03 |

QC | Town of Sherbrooke |  | Lib | Gain | 50.42 | 2.18 |  | 2.18

| Lib | -2.18 |

QC | Soulanges |  | Lib | Gain | 53.64 | 5.09 |  | 5.09

| Lib | -5.09 |

QC | St. Anne |  | Con | Hold | 56.40 | 5.78 |  | 5.78

| Con | 5.78 |  | 5.78

QC | St. Antoine |  | Con | Hold | 63.68 | 6.74 |  | 6.74

| Con | 6.74 |  | 6.74

QC | St. Hyacinthe |  | Lib | Hold | 51.57 | -5.23 |

|  | Con | -5.23 |

QC | St. James |  | Lib | Hold | 59.41 | -2.40 |

|  | Nat-Con | -2.40 |

QC | St. Johns—Iberville |  | Lib | Hold | 78.35 | -16.51 |

|  | Con | -16.51 |

QC | St. Lawrence |  | Lib | Hold | 54.18 | -0.98 |

|  | Con | -0.24 |

QC | St. Mary |  | Lib | Hold | 62.82 | 5.79 |  | 5.79

| Lib | 6.40 |  | 6.4

QC | Stanstead |  | Lib | Hold | 52.31 | 0.40 |  | 0.4

| Lib | 0.40 |  | 0.4

QC | Témiscouata |  | Lib | Hold | 51.89 | -4.28 |

|  | Con | -4.28 |

QC | Terrebonne |  | Con | Hold | 56.48 | 5.71 |  | 5.71

| Con | 5.71 |  | 5.71

QC | Three Rivers and St. Maurice |  | Lib | Hold | 50.07 | -13.83 |

|  | Con | -13.83 |

QC | Two Mountains |  | Lib | Hold | acclaimed
QC | Vaudreuil |  | Lib | Hold | 54.34 | -13.91 |

|  | Con | -13.91 |

QC | Wright |  | Lib | Hold | 58.68 | 3.13 |  | 3.13

| Lib | 3.13 |  | 3.13

QC | Yamaska |  | Con | Gain | 51.28 | 2.50 |  | 2.5

| Con | -2.50 |

SK | Assiniboia |  | Lib | Hold | 61.86 | 8.53 |  | 8.53

| Lib | 8.53 |  | 8.53

SK | Battleford |  | Lib | Hold | 60.76 | 0.34 |  | 0.34

| Lib | 0.34 |  | 0.34

SK | Humboldt |  | Lib | Hold | 71.14 | 8.98 |  | 8.98

| Lib | 8.98 |  | 8.98

SK | Mackenzie |  | Lib | Hold | 70.17 | 4.50 |  | 4.5

| Lib | 4.50 |  | 4.5

SK | Moose Jaw |  | Lib | Hold | 58.19 | 0.20 |  | 0.2

| Lib | 0.20 |  | 0.2

SK | Prince Albert |  | Con | Gain | 52.83 | 6.09 |  | 6.09

| Con | -5.16 |

SK | Qu'Appelle |  | Lib | Gain | 52.59 | 2.94 |  | 2.94

| Lib | -2.94 |

SK | Regina |  | Lib | Hold | 54.63 | -0.21 |

|  | Lib | 3.29 |  | 3.29

SK | Saltcoats |  | Lib | Hold | 65.17 | 11.66 |  | 11.66

| Lib | 7.97 |  | 7.97

SK | Saskatoon |  | Lib | Hold | 54.70 | -8.00 |

|  | Con | -4.63 |

Terr | Yukon |  | Con | Gain | 60.79 | 50.03 |  | 50.03

| N/A[a 3]

1. ^ Share won by winning candidate, with difference noted from share achieved by the same party in 1908.
2. ^ Positive indicates improvement to standing of party winning in 1908; negative points to 2020's second-place party being swung to.
3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j 2nd place finisher in 1908 did not contest the 1911 election.
4. ^ a b Winning party did not field a candidate inn 1908.
5. ^ Hormidas Mayrand (Liberal) win in 1908 and lost in 1911 (both were two-way contests). Opponents in each election were of different affiliations.
6. ^ Liberal candidate won in 1908 but lost in 1911. There were also two Independent Liberal candidates in 1908, while the Conservatives fielded a candidate only in 1911.

## See also

[edit]

* Canada portal
* Politics portal

* List of Canadian federal general elections
* List of political parties in Canada
* 11th Canadian Parliament
* 1988 Canadian federal election (Canada-US relations elections)
* 2025 Canadian federal election (Canada-US relations elections)

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ Laurier was elected in both Soulanges and Quebec East, and chose to serve concurrently as the Member of Parliament for both.

## References

[edit]

* Argyle, Ray. Turning Points : The Campaigns that Changed Canada : 2004 and before (2004) online

pp. 117–154.

* Brown, Robert Craig. Robert Laird Borden: A Biography (1975), the major scholarly biography
* Brown, Robert Craig, and Ramsay Cook. Canada: 1896–1921 (1974)
* Dafoe John W. Clifford Sifton in Relation to His Times. Toronto, 1931.
* Dafoe John W. Laurier: a Study in Canadian Politics. Toronto, 1922.
* Dutil, Patrice A.; MacKenzie, David (2011). Canada 1911: The Decisive Election that Shaped the Country. Toronto: Dundurn. ISBN 978-1-55488-947-1.
* Ellis, L. Ethan. Reciprocity, 1911: A Study in Canadian-American Relations (1939) online
* Hopkins, J. Castell (1912). The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1911. Toronto: The Annual Review Publishing Company.
* Johnston, Richard; Percy, Michael B. (1980). "Reciprocity, Imperial Sentiment, and Party Politics in the 1911 Election". Canadian Journal of Political Science. 13 (4): 711–729\. doi:10.1017/S0008423900034004. S2CID 154189040.
* Neatby, H. Blair (1973). Clippingdale, Richard T (ed.). Laurier and a Liberal Quebec. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1w1vn9k. ISBN 9780773595354.
* MacQuarrie, Heath (1959). "Robert Borden and the Election of 1911". The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 25 (3): 271–286\. doi:10.2307/138903. JSTOR 138903.
* Porritt Edward. Sixty Years of Protection in Canada, 1846–1907: Where Industry Leans on the Politicians. (London, 1908) online
* Potter, Simon J. (2004). "The Imperial Significance of the Canadian–American Reciprocity Proposals of 1911". The Historical Journal. 47: 81–100\. doi:10.1017/S0018246X03003522. S2CID 159586052.
* Stevens, Paul D. The 1911 General Election: A Study in Canadian Politics (Toronto: Copp Clark, 1970)

### Primary sources

[edit]

* Borden, Robert. Robert Laird Borden: His Memoirs edited and with an introduction by Henry Borden
* Harpell, James J., Canadian National Economy: the Cause of High Prices and Their Effect upon the Country. Toronto, 1911.

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ "Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums". Retrieved March 10, 2019.
2. ^ a b c "1911 Federal Election in Canada". Mapleleafweb. Archived from the original on August 13, 2013. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
3. ^ Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabasca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 p. 17.
4. ^ a b c Allan, Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media p. 18.
5. ^ a b c Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 18.
6. ^ Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 pages 18–19.
7. ^ a b c Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 19.
8. ^ a b c d Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 25.
9. ^ a b c d Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 26.
10. ^ a b c MacKenzie, David & Dutil, Patrice Canada 1911: The Decisive Election that Shaped the Country, Toronto: Dundurn, 2011 page 211.
11. ^ Last Steps to Freedom by John Boyko pg.46
12. ^ Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 29.
13. ^ "Found Some Queer Things: The Sunbury-Queen's Election was apparently very crooked, The Montreal Gazette · Sep 27, 1911
14. ^ a b "General Election (1908-10-26)". lop.parl.ca. Library of Parliament. Retrieved May 1, 2025.
15. ^ a b "General Election (1911-09-21)". lop.parl.ca. Library of Parliament. Retrieved May 1, 2025.

## See also

[edit]

* 12th Canadian Parliament

* v
* t
* e

1911 Canadian federal election

* Outgoing: Liberal majority
* Result: Conservative majority

* Conservative (Robert Borden)
* Labour Party of Canada
* Liberal (Wilfrid Laurier)
* Socialist (E.T. Kingsley)

Bold indicates parties with members elected to the House of Commons.

* MPs who stood down
* MPs who lost their seat
* Results overview
* Results by riding

* v
* t
* e

Federal elections and referendums in Canada

General elections|

* 1867
* 1872
* 1874
* 1878
* 1882
* 1887
* 1891
* 1896
* 1900
* 1904
* 1908
* 1911
* 1917
* 1921
* 1925
* 1926
* 1930
* 1935
* 1940
* 1945
* 1949
* 1953
* 1957
* 1958
* 1962
* 1963
* 1965
* 1968
* 1972
* 1974
* 1979
* 1980
* 1984
* 1988
* 1993
* 1997
* 2000
* 2004
* 2006
* 2008
* 2011
* 2015
* 2019
* 2021
* 2025
* Next

By-elections|

* 1st (1867–1872)
* 2nd (1873–1874)
* 3rd (1874–1878)
* 4th (1879–1882)
* 5th (1883–1887)
* 6th (1887–1891)
* 7th (1891–1896)
* 8th (1896–1900)
* 9th (1901–1904)
* 10th (1905–1908)
* 11th (1909–1911)
* 12th (1911–1917)
* 13th (1918–1921)
* 14th (1921–1925)
* 15th (1926)
* 16th (1926–1930)
* 17th (1930–1935)
* 18th (1936–1940)
* 19th (1940–1945)
* 20th (1945–1949)
* 21st (1949–1953)
* 22nd (1953–1957)
* 23rd (1957–1958)
* 24th (1958–1962)
* 25th (1962–1963)
* 26th (1963–1965)
* 27th (1965–1968)
* 28th (1968–1972)
* 29th (1973–1974; no by-elections)
* 30th (1974–1979)
* 31st (1979)
* 32nd (1980–1984)
* 33rd (1984–1988)
* 34th (1988–1993)
* 35th (1994–1997)
* 36th (1997–2000)
* 37th (2000–2004)
* 38th (2004–2006)
* 39th (2006–2008)
* 40th (2008–2011)
* 41st (2011–2015)
* 42nd (2015–2019)
* 43rd (2019–2021)
* 44th (2021–2025)
* 45th (2025–present)

Referendums|

* 1898
* 1942
* 1992

* Federal political parties
* Federal electoral districts
* Historical federal electoral districts

*[Lib-Con]: Liberal-Conservative
*[Ind-Con]: Independent Conservative
*[Nat-Con]: Nationalist Conservative
*[Nat]: Nationalist
*[Ind]: Independent or unknown
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template