1971 NCAA University Division baseball rankings

1971 NCAA University Division baseball season

Tournament
College World Series
Champions| USC
Runners-up| Tulsa
MOP| Jerry Tabb (Tulsa)
Seasons

← 1970

1972 →

The following poll makes up the 1971 NCAA University Division baseball rankings. Collegiate Baseball Newspaper published its first human poll of the top 20 teams in college baseball in 1959, and expanded to rank the top 30 teams in 1961.

## Collegiate Baseball

[edit]

Currently, only the final poll from the 1971 season is available.[1][2]

Rank  | Team

|

1  | USC
2  | Southern Illinois
3  | Tulsa
4  | Texas–Pan American
5  | BYU
6  | Harvard
7  | Mississippi State
8  | Seton Hall
9  | Santa Clara
10  | Georgia Tech
11  | Ohio
12  | Miami (Fla.)
13  | Cincinnati
14  | Michigan State
15  | Gonzaga
16  | Iowa State
17  | Texas
18  | Arizona State
19  | Washington State
20  | UMass
21  | San Jose State
22  | Maryland
23  | Florida State
24  | South Alabama
25  | Iona
26  | Buffalo
27  | St. Joseph's (Pa.)
28  | Penn State
29  | Miami (Ohio)
30  | Oklahoma

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "1971 NCAA DIV I Final Poll". Collegiate Baseball. Archived from the original on December 15, 2010. Retrieved July 8, 2012.
2. ^ "Division I Baseball Records" (PDF). NCAA. p. 38. Retrieved July 8, 2012.

* v
* t
* e

NCAA Division I baseball rankings

1950s–1960s|

* 1950 · 1951 · 1952 · 1953 · 1954 · 1955 · 1956 · 1957 · 1958 · 1959
* 1960
* 1961
* 1962
* 1963
* 1964
* 1965
* 1966
* 1967
* 1968
* 1969

1970s–1980s|

* 1970
* 1971
* 1972
* 1973
* 1974
* 1975
* 1976
* 1977
* 1978
* 1979
* 1980
* 1981
* 1982
* 1983
* 1984
* 1985
* 1986
* 1987
* 1988
* 1989

1990s–2000s|

* 1990
* 1991
* 1992
* 1993
* 1994
* 1995
* 1996
* 1997
* 1998
* 1999
* 2000
* 2001
* 2002
* 2003
* 2004
* 2005
* 2006
* 2007
* 2008
* 2009

2010s–2020s|

* 2010
* 2011
* 2012
* 2013
* 2014
* 2015
* 2016
* 2017
* 2018
* 2019
* 2020
* 2021
* 2022
* 2023
* 2024

Polls|

* Coaches Poll
* Baseball America
* Collegiate Baseball
* NCBWA

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template