2008 Colorado Amendment 47

Amendment 47

* * *

|  | November 4, 2008 |

|
|

* * *

Prohibition on Mandatory Labor Union Membership and Dues

Results

Choice

| Votes  | %

|
|

Yes  | 1,003,056  | 43.89%
No  | 1,282,501 | 56.11%
Total votes | 2,285,557 | 100.00%

* * *

For

50–60%

Against

70–80%

60–70%

50–60%

|

Elections in Colorado

Federal government

|  Presidential elections

* 1876
* 1880
* 1884
* 1888
* 1892
* 1896
* 1900
* 1904
* 1908
* 1912
* 1916
* 1920
* 1924
* 1928
* 1932
* 1936
* 1940
* 1944
* 1948
* 1952
* 1956
* 1960
* 1964
* 1968
* 1972
* 1976
* 1980
* 1984
* 1988
* 1992
* 1996
* 2000
* 2004
* 2008
* 2012
* 2016
* 2020
* 2024

Presidential caucuses and primaries

Democratic
2000
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024

Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections

* 1876
* 1879
* 1883 sp
* 1885
* 1889
* 1891
* 1895
* 1897
* 1901
* 1903
* 1907
* 1909
* 1913
* 1913 sp
* 1914
* 1918
* 1920
* 1924
* 1924 sp
* 1926
* 1930
* 1932
* 1932 sp
* 1936
* 1938
* 1942
* 1942 sp
* 1944
* 1948
* 1950
* 1954
* 1956
* 1960
* 1962
* 1966
* 1968
* 1972
* 1974
* 1978
* 1980
* 1984
* 1986
* 1990
* 1992
* 1996
* 1998
* 2002
* 2004
* 2008
* 2010
* 2014
* 2016
* 2020
* 2022
* 2026
* 2028

U.S. House of Representatives elections

* 1876
* 1878
* 1880
* 1882
* 1884
* 1886
* 1888
* 1890
* 1892
* 1894
* 1896
* 1898
* 1900
* 1902
* 1904
* 1906
* 1908
* 1910
* 1912
* 1914
* 1916
* 1918
* 1920
* 1922
* 1924
* 1926
* 1927
* 1st sp
* 1928
* 1930
* 1932
* 1934
* 1936
* 1938
* 1940
* 3rd sp
* 1941
* 4th sp
* 1942
* 1944
* 1st sp
* 1946
* 1948
* 1950
* 1952
* 1954
* 1956
* 1958
* 1960
* 1962
* 1964
* 1966
* 1968
* 1970
* 1972
* 1974
* 1976
* 1978
* 1980
* 1982
* 1983
* 6th sp
* 1984
* 1986
* 1988
* 1990
* 1992
* 1994
* 1996
* 1998
* 2000
* 2002
* 2004
* 2006
* 2008
* 2010
* 2012
* 2014
* 2016
* 2018
* 2020
* 2022
* 2024
* 4th sp

State government

|  General elections

* 2010
* 2014
* 2018
* 2020
* 2022

Gubernatorial elections

* 1876
* 1878
* 1880
* 1882
* 1884
* 1886
* 1888
* 1890
* 1894
* 1896
* 1898
* 1900
* 1902
* 1904
* 1906
* 1908
* 1910
* 1912
* 1914
* 1916
* 1918
* 1920
* 1922
* 1924
* 1926
* 1928
* 1930
* 1932
* 1934
* 1936
* 1938
* 1940
* 1942
* 1944
* 1946
* 1948
* 1950
* 1952
* 1954
* 1956
* 1958
* 1962
* 1966
* 1970
* 1974
* 1978
* 1982
* 1986
* 1990
* 1994
* 1998
* 2002
* 2006
* 2010
* 2014
* 2018
* 2022
* 2026

Secretary of State elections

* 2022

Attorney General elections

* 2014
* 2018
* 2022

Treasurer elections

* 2022

Colorado State Board of Regent elections

* 2016

Senate elections

* 2013 (recall)
* 2014
* 2016
* 2018
* 2020
* 2022
* 2024

House of Representatives elections

* 2018
* 2020
* 2022
* 2024

Ballot measures

|  List of Colorado ballot measures

* 1893
* 2
* 1972
* 8
* 1974
* 1
* 1982
* 1
* 1992
* 2
* 2000
* 20
* 2004
* 36
* 2006
* 38
* 41
* 42
* 43
* 44
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* 2008
* 46
* 47
* 48
* 49
* 50
* 51
* 52
* 54
* 58
* 59
* L
* 2010
* 62
* 2012
* 64
* 2018
* A
* 2020
* B
* C
* EE
* 113
* 114
* 2022
* 125
* 126
* FF
* 2023
* HH
* II
* 2024
* 79
* 80
* I
* J
* 127
* 128
* 129
* 131

Colorado Springs

|  Local elections

* 2019

Mayoral elections

* 1995
* 1997 sp
* 1999
* 2003
* 2007
* 2011
* 2015
* 2019
* 2023

Denver

|  Mayoral elections

* 2003
* 2007
* 2011
* 2015
* 2019
* 2023

El Paso County

|  Local elections

* 2018

Pueblo

|  Mayoral elections

* 2023–24

* v
* t
* e

Amendment 47 was a proposed initiative on the Colorado ballot for 2008. It was defeated.

The initiative was proposed jointly by Ryan Frazier of Aurora and Julian Jay Cole of Golden.[1] According to the Blue Book, the state-provided ballot guide, Amendment 47 "proposes amending the Colorado Constitution to: prohibit requiring an employee to join and pay any dues or fees to a labor union as a condition of employment; and create a misdemeanor penalty for violation of this law."

If ratified, Amendment 47 would have added a new section to the Colorado Constitution, which would state, in part:

(1) This Amendment shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Right to Work Amendment".
(2) (a) No person shall, as a condition of employment, be required to:

(I) be a member of a labor union; and
(II) pay any dues, fees, assessments, or other charges of any kind to a labor union or to any charity or other third party, in lieu of such payments.
(b) Nothing in this section shall prevent any person from voluntarily belonging or voluntarily providing financial support to a labor union.
(3) Any person who directly or indirectly violated any provision of this section commits a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine in an amount equivalent to the most stringent misdemeanor classification provided by law.[2]

## Fact-checking

[edit]

### Pro-Amendment 47 political ads

[edit]

KUSA, the NBC affiliate in Denver, Colorado, analyzed one of the political ads supporting Amendment 47. Among their conclusions were that the particular ad was misleading when it stated, "All it does, it gives workers the right to choose for themselves whether or not they want to join a union." KUSA's analysis states:

As it stands now, [...] federal law prohibits anyone from being forced to join a union. What Amendment 47 would really do is give workers the right to decide if they want to pay any dues to the union for the purposes of negotiating for wages and benefits.[3]

They also noted that agencies promoting passage of the amendment have received contributions from two organizations in Virginia, the Free Enterprise Alliance in Arlington the National Right to Work Committee in Springfield.[3]

### Anti-Amendment 47 political ads

[edit]

Channel Nine News also fact-checked a political ad from the opposition. Their conclusions (excerpted):

TRUTH TEST: Will Amendment 47 hurt Colorado's economy?

QUOTE: The few rich owners who are pushing Constitutional Amendment 47 say they want to give people a choice.

TRUTH: It is true that some wealthy businessmen and women have backed Amendment 47 and groups supporting this amendment do discuss freedom of choice and the rights of workers. [...]

QUOTE: You do have a choice. Would you choose to pass an amendment that could strip away all progress that Colorado workers have made with wages and health care and retirement?

TRUTH: This is opinion, but regards the concerns opponents have about the impact of this measure on union organization in the state. [...]

QUOTE: In times like these, who would choose to destabilize Colorado's economy and put jobs at risk?

TRUTH: This is opinion, but regards opponents' concerns related to employment and working conditions. [...]

QUOTE: If it's not broke, why fix it? No on 47. It's risky, it's reckless, it's wrong.

TRUTH: This is opinion.[4]

## Controversy

[edit]

The backers of Amendment 47 have been found to have violated campaign finance laws.[5]

## Support and opposition

[edit]

One organization which supports Amendment 47 is called For A Better Colorado. An organization in opposition is called Protect Colorado.

## Results

[edit]

Amendment 47[6] Choice  | Votes  | %

|
|

No | 1,282,501 | 56.11
Yes  | 1,003,056  | 43.89
Total votes | 2,285,557 | 100.00

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Rocky Mountain News
2. ^ 2008 State Ballot Information Booklet, "Blue Book Archived 2008-10-10 at the Wayback Machine", State of Colorado
3. ^ a b O'Malley, Mary Jean, and Adam Schrager, October 17, 2008. "TRUTH TEST: Is Amendment 47 about employee freedom?[permanent dead link‍]", Channel Nine News.
4. ^ By: Mary Jean O'Malley and Adam Schrager, October 18, 2008. "TRUTH TEST: Will Amendment 47 hurt Colorado's economy?[permanent dead link‍]", Channel Nine News.
5. ^ Amendment 47 backers run afoul of campaign finance law
6. ^ Buescher, Bernie (June 29, 2009). "Official Publication of the Abstract of Votes Cast for the 2008 Primary 2008 General" (PDF). Secretary of State of Colorado. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 29, 2016. Retrieved October 3, 2024.

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template