Assyrian continuity

Continuity between ancient and modern Assyrians

The modern Assyrian flag (top) uses ancient Assyrian iconography, including the god Ashur (bottom left) and the star of the god Shamash (bottom right)

Timeline of the Assyrian identity throughout the millennia

Assyrian continuity is the study of continuity between the modern Assyrian people, a recognised Semitic indigenous ethnic, religious, and linguistic minority in Western Asia (particularly in Iraq, northeast Syria, southeast Turkey, northwest Iran and in the Assyrian diaspora) and the people of Ancient Mesopotamia in general and ancient Assyria in particular. Assyrian continuity and Ancient Mesopotamian heritage is a key part of the identity of the modern Assyrian people.[1] No archaeological, genetic, linguistic, anthropological, or written historical evidence exists of the original Assyrian and Mesopotamian population being exterminated, removed, bred out, or replaced in the aftermath of the fall of the Assyrian Empire.[2] Modern contemporary scholarship "almost unilaterally" supports Assyrian continuity, recognizing the modern Assyrians (and Mandaeans) as the ethnic, historical, and genetic descendants of the East Assyrian-speaking population of Bronze Age and Iron Age Assyria specifically, and (alongside the Mandeans) of Mesopotamia in general,[2][3][4][5] which were composed of both the old native Assyrian population[2][3][5] and of neighboring settlers in the Assyrian heartland.[2][a]

Due to an initial long-standing shortage of historical sources beyond the Bible and a handful of inaccurate and contradictory works by a few later classical European authors, many "Western" historians prior to the early 19th century believed Assyrians (and Babylonians) to have been completely annihilated, although this was never the view in the region of Mesopotamia itself or surrounding regions in West Asia, where the name of the land continued to be applied until the mid 7th century AD, and Assyrian people have continued to be referenced as such through to the present day.

Many European writers also often inaccurately equated Assyrians with Nestorians during the Medieval Era, a now unanimously rejected idea that lingered into the early 19th century among some western scholars, despite Assyrian conversion to Christianity preceding Nestorianism by many centuries, and Assyrians being multi denominational and members of churches such as the Assyrian Church of the East, Syriac Orthodox Church (and from the 17th century offshoot of the Assyrian Church, the Chaldean Catholic Church) which are doctrinally distinct from Nestorianism.

Modern Assyriology has increasingly and successfully challenged and disproved the initial Western perception; today, Assyriologists, Iranologists and historians recognize that Assyrian culture, identity, and people clearly survived the violent fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire and endured into modern times. The last period of ancient Assyrian history is now regarded to be the long post-imperial period from the 6th century BC through to the 7th century AD when Assyria was also known as Athura, Assyria Provincia and Asoristan, during which the Akkadian language gradually went extinct by the 1st century AD, but other aspects of Assyrian culture, such as religion, traditions, and naming patterns, and the Akkadian influenced East Aramaic dialects specific to Mesopotamia survived in a reduced but highly recognizable form before giving way to specifically native forms of Eastern Rite Christianity, with the Akkadian influenced Assyrian Aramaic dialects surviving into the present day.[8][9][10]

The gradual extinction of Akkadian and its replacement with Akkadian influenced East Aramaic does not reflect the disappearance of the original Assyrian population;[2] Aramaic was used not only by settlers but was also adopted by native Assyrians and Babylonians,[3] in time even becoming used by the royal administrations of Assyria and Babylonia themselves, and indeed retained by the succeeding Indo-European speaking Achaemenid Empire.[11][12] In fact, the new language of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the Imperial Aramaic, was itself a creation of the Assyrian Empire and its people, and with its retention of an Akkadian grammatical structure and Akkadian words and names, is distinct from the Western Aramaic of the Levant which gradually replaced the Canaanite languages (with the partial exception of Hebrew). In addition, Aramaic also replaced other Semitic languages such as Hebrew, Phoenician, Arabic, Edomite, Moabite, Amorite, Ugarite, Dilmunite, and Chaldean among non-Aramean peoples without prejudicing their origins and identity.[13] Since the Aramaic language was so deeply integrated into the empire and due to the fact it was spread chiefly by Assyria, in later Demotic Egyptian, Greek, and Mishanic Hebrew texts it was referred to as the "Assyrian writing."[14] Due to assimilation efforts encouraged by Assyrian kings, fellow Semitic Arameans, Israelites, Judeans, Phoenicians, and other non-Semitic groups such as Hittites, Hurrians, Urartians, Phrygians, Persians, and Elamites deported into the Assyrian heartland are also likely to quickly have been absorbed into the native population, self-identified, and been regarded, as Assyrians.[2] The Assyrian population of Upper Mesopotamia was largely Christianized between the 1st and 4th centuries AD, however Mesopotamian religion enduring among Assyrians in small pockets until the late Middle Ages, a further indication of continuity. Assyrian Aramaic-language sources from the Christian period predominantly use the self-designation Suryāyā ("Syrian") alongside "Athoraya" and "Asoraya",[15][16] with early medieval Arab, Persian and Armenian sources using the derivative terms "Ashuriyun", "Asori" and "Assuri" respectively. The term Suryāyā, sometimes alternatively translated as "Syrian" or "Syriac", is generally accepted to derive from the ancient Akkadian Assūrāyu, meaning Assyrian.[17][18] The academic consensus is that the modern name "Syria" originated as a shortened form of "Assyria" and applied originally only to Mesopotamian Assyria and not to the modern Levantine country of Syria.[19]

Assyrian nationalism centered on a desire for self-determination developed near the end of the 19th century, coinciding with increasing contacts with Europeans, increasing levels of ethnic and religious persecution, along with increased expressions nationalism in other Middle Eastern groups, such as the Arabs, Armenians, Copts, Jews, Kurds, Persians, and Turks.[20] Through the large-scale promotion of long extant terms and promotion of identities such as ʾĀthorāyā and ʾAsurāyā, Assyrian intellectuals and authors hoped to inspire the unification of the Assyrian nation, transcending long-standing religious denominational divisions between the Assyrian Church of the East, its 17th century offshoot, the Chaldean Catholic Church, the Syriac Orthodox Church, and various smaller largely Protestant denominations.[20] This effort has been met with both support and some opposition from various religious communities; some denominations have rejected unity and promoted alternate religious identities, such as "Aramean", "Syriac", and "Chaldean". Though some religious officials and activists (particularly in the west) have promoted such identities as separate ethnic groups rather than simply religious denominational groups, they are not generally treated as such by international organizations or historians, and historically, genetically, geographically and linguistically these are all the same Assyrian people.[21][22][23]

## Assyrians after the Assyrian Empire

[edit]

### Early assumption of Assyrian annihilation

[edit]

Fall of Nineveh (1829) by John Martin

Ancient Assyria fell in the late 7th century BC through the Medo-Babylonian conquest of the Assyrian Empire, with most of its major population centers violently sacked and most of its territory incorporated into the fellow Mesopotamian Neo-Babylonian Empire.[24] In the millennia following the fall of Assyria, knowledge of the ancient empire chiefly survived in western literary tradition through accounts of Assyria in the Hebrew Bible and works by classical authors,[25] both of which described Assyria's fall as violent and comprehensive destruction.[26][27] Before the 19th century, the prevalent belief in Biblically influenced western scholarship was that ancient Assyria and Babylonia had been literally annihilated due to provoking divine wrath.[28] This belief was reinforced through archaeologists in the Middle East initially not finding many remains fitting with the conventional European image of ancient cities, with stone columns and great sculptures, beyond those of ancient Persia;[28] Assyria and other Mesopotamian civilizations left no magnificent ruins above ground—all that remained to see were huge grass-covered mounds in the plains which travellers at times believed to simply be natural features of the landscape.[25] Early European archaeologists in the Middle East were also for the most part more interested in confirming Biblical truth through their excavations than to spend time on new interpretations of the evidence they discovered.[29]

Though the Bible and other Hebrew texts describe the destruction of the Assyrian Empire, they do not actually claim that the Assyrian people were destroyed or replaced. The 2nd century BC apocryphal Book of Judith states that the Neo-Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II (r. 605–562 BC) "ruled over the Assyrians in the great city of Nineveh", the Book of Ezra refers to the Persian king Darius I as "king of Assyria", and the Book of Isaiah states that there will come a day when God will proclaim "Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my heritage".[30] The erroneous idea of complete Assyrian annihilation, despite increasing evidence to the contrary, proved to be enduring in western academia. As late as 1925, the Assyriologist Sidney Smith wrote that "The disappearance of the Assyrian people will always remain a unique and striking phenomenon in ancient history. Other, similar kingdoms and empires have indeed passed away, but the people have lived on ... No other land seems to have been sacked and pillaged so completely as was Assyria".[31] Just a year later, Smith had completely abandoned the idea of the Assyrians having been eradicated and recognized the persistence of Assyrians through the Christian period into the present.[32]

### Post-imperial Assyria in modern Assyriology

[edit]

See also: Post-imperial Assyria

Stele in the style of ancient Assyrian royal steles, inscribed in Aramaic and erected in Assur in the 2nd century AD (under Parthian rule) by the local ruler Rʻuth-Assor[33]

Modern Assyriology does not support the idea that the fall of Assyria also brought with it an eradication of the Assyrian people and their culture.[34][9][35] Though in the past regarded as a "post-Assyrian" age, Assyriologists today consider the last period of ancient Assyrian history to be the long post-imperial period,[34][36][9] extending from 609 BC to around AD 250 with the destruction of the semi-independent Assyrian states of Assur, Osroene, Adiabene, Beth Nuhadra and Beth Garmai by the Sassanid Empire, or to the end of Sassanid ruled Asoristan (Assyria) and the Islamic Conquest around 637 AD, and support a continuity into the present day.[34][10][37]

Though the centuries that followed the fall of Assyria are characterized by a distinct lack of surviving sources from the region, at least in comparison to previous eras,[34] the idea that Assyria was rendered uninhabited and desolated stems from the contrast with the richly attested Neo-Assyrian period, not from the actual extant written sources from the post-imperial period, which although reduced, remain unbroken through to the modern era.[38]

Though the Assyrian bureaucracy and governmental institutions disappeared with Assyria's fall, Assyrian population centers and culture did not.[38] At Dur-Katlimmu, one of the largest settlements along the Khabur river, a large Assyrian palace, dubbed the "Red House" by archaeologists, continued to be used in Neo-Babylonian times, with cuneiform records there being written by people with Assyrian names, in Assyrian style, though dated to the reigns of the early Neo-Babylonian kings.[39] These documents mention officials with Assyrian titles and invoke the ancient Assyrian national deity Ashur.[38] Two Neo-Babylonian texts discovered at the city of Sippar in Babylonia attest to there being royally appointed governors at both Assur and Guzana, another Assyrian site in the north. Arbela is attested as a thriving Assyrian city, but only very late in the Neo-Babylonian period, and there were attempts to revive the city of Arrapha in reign of Neriglissar (r. 560–556 BC), who returned a cult statue to the site. Harran was revitalized, with its great temple dedicated to the lunar god Sîn being rebuilt under Nabonidus whose mother was an Assyrian priestess from that city. (r. 556–539 BC).[39] In nearby Edessa, Assyrian religious traditions also survived well into the common era.[40] Even in certain regions beyond the Euphrates, the legacy of Assyria endured, such as in Hierapolis where Shalmaneser had once settled many Assyrians. By at least the second century CE, the memory of Semiramis and Sardanapalus was faithfully preserved by the city's inhabitants, as mentioned by Lucian.[40] The Assyrians who remained in their homeland clung to their old ways of living, as illustrated by the continuation of pottery forms discovered in certain areas, but also by the endurance of Assyrian cultural traditions expressed through various Aramaic legends like those of Ahiqar, Behnam, or Šamaš-šuma-ukin's rebellion against his brother Ashurbanipal.[41] Aramaic speakers from the 9th century BCE to the late Hellenistic period lived, wrote, and thought in ways deeply connected to the practices and traditions of the Akkadian writing empires, and Aramaic scribes even purposefully adopted Assyrian and Babylonian Akkadian names for themselves in an effort to associate with the cultures of these kingdoms.[42][43] Aramaic literature does not show a strong attachment to any ethnic group from the Iron Age. Instead, it celebrates the achievements of Assyrian, Egyptian, and Persian kings. In the legend of Ahiqar, Sennacherib is portrayed as a just and thoughtful ruler, in sharp contrast to the image presented in the book of Isaiah. At other times, Aramaic literature traces its lineage back to the Akkadian period with Sargon, or to Hebrew kings such as David, Solomon, and others.[44][45] The story of Ahiqar, through its remembrance of the Assyrian court and its references to various Assyrian kings, attests to the continuing interest among Aramaic-speakers in identifying with an Assyrian past.[46]

Individuals with Assyrian names are attested at multiple sites in Assyria and Babylonia during the Neo-Babylonian Empire, including Babylon, Nippur, Uruk, Sippar, Dilbat and Borsippa. The Assyrians in Uruk apparently continued to exist as a community until the reign of the Achaemenid king Cambyses II (r. 530–522 BC) and were closely linked to a local cult dedicated to Ashur.[47] Many individuals with clearly Assyrian names are also known from the rule of the Achaemenid Empire, sometimes in high levels of government. A prominent example is Pan-Ashur-lumur, who served as the secretary of Cambyses II.[48] Distinctively Assyrian names are also found in Aramaic and Greek throughout cities like Hatra, Assur, Dura-Europos and Palmyra, among other regions in the late antique period. Although the Assyrians no longer spoke Akkadian, they continued using traditions from Assyria's imperial period, with certain name forms surviving well into the Christian period and being attested in Syriac onomastica.[49] The temple dedicated to Ashur in Assur was rebuilt by local Assyrians in the reign of Cyrus the Great. Assyria was powerful enough to rebel twice against the Achaemenid Empire during the late 6th century BC, Assyrian troops provided heavy infantry and archers in the Achaemenid army, Assyrian agriculture provided a breadbasket for the empire and the Imperial Aramaic of the Assyrian Empire was continued by the Achaemenid Empire.[50]

Under the Seleucid and Parthian empires, further efforts were made to revitalize Assyria and the ancient great cities began to be resettled,[51] with the predominant portion of the population remaining native Assyrian.[52] The original Assyrian capital of Assur is in particular known to have flourished during the Parthian era.[53] Continuity from ancient Assyria is clear in Assur and other cities such as Arbela during this period, with personal names of the city's denizens greatly reflecting names used in the Neo-Assyrian Empire, such as Qib-Assor ("command of Ashur"), Assor-tares ("Ashur judges") and even Assor-heden ("Ashur has given a brother", a late version of the name Aššur-aḫu-iddina, i.e. Esarhaddon), reflecting names extant in the lafe 3rd millennium BC.[54] The Assyrians at Assur continued to follow the traditional ancient Mesopotamian religion, worshipping Ashur (at this time known as Assor) and other Mesopotamian gods such as Shamash, Ishtar, Sin, Adad, Bel, Nergal, Ninurta and Tammuz.[55] Assur may even have been the capital of its own semi-autonomous or vassal state, either under the suzerainty of the largely Assyrian populated Kingdom of Hatra,[56] or under direct Parthian suzerainty.[57] Though this second golden age of Assur came to an end with the conquest, sack and destruction of the city by the Sasanian Empire c. AD 240–250,[58] the inscriptions, temples, continued celebration of festivals and the wealth of theophoric elements (divine names) in personal names of the Parthian period illustrate a strong continuity of traditions dating back to circa 21st century BC, and that the most important deities of old Assyria were still worshipped at Assur and elsewhere more than 800 years after the Assyrian Empire had been destroyed.[8] In the southern region of Babylonia, Assyrian traditions also continued to survive, particularly in the city of Uruk. Assyrian personal names invoking Assur remained in use throughout Hellenistic Babylonia, with the families who bore them likely descending from Assyrians who had settled in the south. In Uruk, the cult of Assur survived, and certain temple priests carried names that included Assur. Cuneiform texts from the city preserved distinctly Assyrian and Ninevite literary traditions across various fields such as astrology, while some families even preserved ancient Assyrian cuneiform texts as heirlooms. Certain scholars in Hellenistic Uruk clearly cultivated an awareness of the Assyrian past and culture by such practices, and kept the memory of Assyria alive by preserving tales like that of Ahiqar, the sage of the Assyrian king Esarhaddon.[59]

## Identity in ancient Assyria

[edit]

### Development and distinctions

[edit]

Glazed tile from Nimrud depicting a Neo-Assyrian king, accompanied by attendants

Ethnicity and culture are largely based in self-perception and self-designation.[2] In ancient Assyria, a distinct Assyrian identity appears to have formed already in the Old Assyrian period (c. 2025–1364 BC), when distinctly Assyrian burial practices, foods and dress codes are attested[60] and Assyrian documents appear to consider the inhabitants of Assur to be a distinct cultural group, even though they were ethnolinguistically identical to the Semites of Southern Mesopotamia (Babylonia).[61] A wider Assyrian identity appears to have spread across northern Mesopotamia under the Middle Assyrian Empire (c. 1363–912 BC), since later writings concerning the reconquests of the early Neo-Assyrian kings refer to some of their wars as liberating the Assyrian people of the cities they reconquered.[62] Though there for much of ancient Assyria's history existed a distinct Assyrian identity, Assyrian culture and civilization, like any other culture and civilization, did not develop in isolation. As the Assyrian Empire expanded and contracted, elements from regions the Assyrians conquered or traded with culturally influenced the Assyrian heartland and the Assyrians themselves. Early Assyrian culture was greatly influenced by the Hurrians and vice versa, a people that also lived in northern Mesopotamia, and by the culture of southern Mesopotamia, particularly that of Sumer and Babylonia.[3]

Surviving evidence suggests that the ancient Assyrians had a relatively open definition of what it meant to be Assyrian. Modern ideas such as a person's ethnic background, or the Roman idea of legal citizenship, do not appear to have been reflected in ancient Assyria.[2] Although Assyrian accounts and artwork of warfare frequently describe and depict foreign enemies, they are not usually depicted with different physical features, but rather with different clothing and equipment, though this may be more related to the fact Assyria mostly had contact with other societies in Western Asia, Anatolia, East Mediterranean, North Africa and Southern Caucasus where the people were likely similar physically to the Assyrians. Assyrian accounts describe enemies as barbaric only in terms of their behaviour, as lacking correct religious practices or being uncivilised, and as doing wrongdoings against Assyria. All things considered, there does not appear to have been any well-developed concepts of ethnicity or race in ancient Assyria.[63] What mattered for a person to be seen by others as Assyrian was mainly fulfillment of obligations (such as military service), being affiliated with the Assyrian Empire politically, and maintaining loyalty to the Assyrian king; some kings, such as Sargon II (r. 722–705 BC), explicitly encouraged assimilation and mixture of foreign cultures with that of Assyria.[2]

## Pre-modern self-identities

[edit]

Photograph of a portion of the Çineköy inscription

Though many foreign states ruled over the Assyrian heartland in the millennia following the empire's fall, there is no evidence of any large scale influx of immigrants that replaced the original population,[2] which instead continued to make up a significant portion of the region's people until Mongol and Timurid massacres in the late 14th century.[64] In pre-modern ecclesiastical Syriac-language (the type of Aramaic used in Christian Mesopotamian writings) sources, the typical self-designations used is suryāyā (as well as the shortened surayā), and sometimes ʾāthorāyā ("Assyrian") and ʾārāmāyā ("Aramaic" or "Aramean").[15][65] A reluctance of the overall Christian population to adopt ʾĀthorāyā as a self-designation probably derives from Assyria's portrayal in the Bible. "Assyrian" (Āthorāyā) also continuously survived as the designation for a Christian from Mosul (ancient Nineveh) and Mesopotamia in general.[66] It is clear from the surviving sources that ʾārāmāyā and suryāyā were not distinct and mutually exclusive identities, but rather interchangeable terms used to refer to the same people; the Syriac author Bardaisan (154–222) is for instance referred to in 4th-century Syriac translations of Eusebius's Church History as both ārāmāyā and suryāyā.[15]

Suryāyā, which also occurs in the forms suryāyē and sūrōyē,[17] though sometimes translated to "Syrian",[67] is believed to derive from the ancient Akkadian term assūrāyu ("Assyrian"), which was sometimes even in ancient times rendered in the shorter form sūrāyu.[17][18] Luwian and Aramaic texts from the time of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, such as the Çineköy inscription, sometimes use the shortened "Syria" for the Assyrian Empire.[68] The consensus in modern academia is thus that "Syria" is simply a shortened form of "Assyria".[19] The modern distinction between "Assyrian" and "Syrian" is the result of ancient Greek historians and cartographers, who designated the Levant as "Syria" and Mesopotamia as "Assyria". By the time the terms are first attested in Greek texts (in the 4th century BC), the local denizens in both the Levant and Mesopotamia had already long used both terms interchangeably for the entire region, and continued to do so well into the later Christian period.[69] Whether the Greeks began referring to Mesopotamia as "Assyria" because they equated the region with the Assyrian Empire, long fallen by the time the term is first attested in Greek, or because they named the region after the people who lived there, the (As)syrians, is not known.[70] It is known however, the Seleucid Greeks conceived that the Aramaic-speakers of the east were descended from the ancient Assyrians, an idea which the Seleucids borrowed from Classical Greeks, who deemed Assyrians and Syrians to be identical. Although the term "Syria" began to be confined to the region west of the Euphrates, the conflation of "Assyrian" and "Syrian" persisted, which is evident among certain communities well into the late medieval period.[71][72] Even Josephus the Hebrew, who had a more unique stance on Syrian identity, perpetuated the traditions of Strabo and Herodotus which held Assyrians and Syrians to consisted of the same ethnos, mentioning the "Syrians" in Babylonia. This region was once under Assyria, and therefore Josephus followed the reasoning of Strabo, who argued that its inhabitants could be called "Assyrians" or "Syrians" interchangeably.[73] Syrians in Roman Syria could also posit themselves as constituting the same ethnic group and heirs of an ancient legacy that their counterparts, the Assyrians in the Parthian and Sasanian kingdoms, claimed.[74] Thus, those inhabiting Roman Syria could still envision the ancient Assyrians as their direct ethnic ancestors or at least the founders of their ethnos.[73] In general, Syrians themselves adopted the Greek formulations that conceived of the Aramaic-speakers of the Near East as being descended from the Assyrians and understood their past through it. In doing so, they came to see themselves as an ethnic group.[75] Hence, from the 1st and 2nd centuries CE, authors from Roman Syro-Mesopotamia, such as Tatian and Lucian, writing in Greek and Aramaic, extensively used the Assyrian past to define their communities in relation to the Greeks and Romans and bore their self-ascriptions as "Syrian" and "Assyrian" with significance.[76][73] Tatian and Lucian designated themselves as Assýrios not only to denote Syrian origin, but to stress a native cultural identity in contrast with Greek.[37] Furthermore, although the Seleucids emphasized their Macedonian origins and implemented a policy of Hellenization upon the inhabitants of the Near East whom they ruled over, they eventually began to assimilate into the native Assyrian population of Mesopotamia and adopt their customs, coming to be seen by their contemporaries and even themselves as the heirs of the Neo-Assyrian empire and dynasty.[77][78] The (As)Syrians too came to see the Seleucids as the successors of Assyria, counting them in continuity with Semiramis and Sardanapalus, thereby Assyrianizing them.[79] The Roman historian Titus Livius particularly captures this process of Greek assimilation into the native populations when he laments that the Macedonians who settled within Mesopotamia have "degenerated into Syrians".[80] Semiramis herself also gained popularity in the East, with women in Mesopotamia bearing her name. Although the Greek provides the basis for the modern tale, the earliest forms of the Saga likely derived from perishable Aramaic sources in the Levant and Mesopotamia, as the tale displays Akkadian influences.[81]

Although suryāyā is thus clearly connected to "Assyrian,"[82] the more prevalent term for ancient Assyrians, ʾāthorāyā is not the typical self-designation in pre-modern sources. Syriac sources did however prominently use ʾāthorāyā in other contexts, particularly in relation to ancient Assyria. Ancient Assyria was typically referred to as ʾāthor, which also survived as a designation for the region surrounding its last great capital, Nineveh.[83] The reluctance of Medieval Syriac Christians to use ʾāthorāyā as a self-designation could perhaps be explained by the Assyrians described in the Bible being prominent enemies of Israel; the term ʾāthorāyā was sometimes employed in Syriac writings as a term for enemies of Christians. In this context, the term was sometimes applied to the Persians of the Sasanian Empire; the 4th-century Syriac writer Ephrem the Syrian for instance referred to the Sasanian Empire as "filthy ʾāthor, mother of corruption". In a similar fashion, the term in this context was also sometimes applied to the later Muslim rulers.[83] Though not used by the overall Syriac-speaking community in the Middle Ages, the term ʾāthorāyā did survive as a self-identity throughout the period as it was the typically used designation for a Syriac Christian from Mosul (ancient Nineveh) and its vicinity.[83] The ancient designation of the homeland of the Aramaic-speaking peoples as being Assyria did not disappear, however, and some Syriac Christians certainly preserved the terms Assyria for the land and Assyrians for the people as self-designations to the present day, although the majority of Syriac Christians identified primarily by village or by religion, as was customary in the Middle East.[84] The use of terms such as ʾāthor and ʾāthorāyā points to at least a recognition of the ancient Assyrians, and to knowledge among Syriac Christians of northern Mesopotamia of their impact on the region, which they had made the center of their empire.[85]

A medieval icon depicting Saints Behnam, Sarah, and the Forty Martyrs; their legend prominently incorporates the ancient Assyrian king Sennacherib

Pre-modern Syriac-language sources at times identified positively with the ancient Assyrians, with the regional population keeping the memory of Assyria alive in the local Syriac histories of the Sasanian period,[86] drawing connections between the ancient empire and themselves.[67] Most prominently, ancient Assyrian kings and figures long appeared in local folklore and literary tradition[87] and claims of descent from ancient Assyrian royalty were forwarded both for figures in folklore and by actual living high-ranking members of society in northern Mesopotamia.[88] Figures like Sargon II,[89] Sennacherib (r. 705–681 BC), Esarhaddon (r. 681–669 BC), Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin long figured in local folklore and literary tradition.[87] In large part, tales from the Sasanian period and later times were invented narratives, based on ancient Assyrian history but applied to local and current landscapes.[90] Medieval tales written in Syriac, such as that of Behnam, Sarah, and the Forty Martyrs, for instance by and large characterize Sennacherib as an archetypical pagan king assassinated as part of a family feud, whose children convert to Christianity.[87] The appearance of Sennacherib in this story is not strange, as many Syriac sources from late antiquity and the early medieval period refer to both him and the Assyrians, usually with the goal of portraying Syriac Christians as the heirs of an Assyrian past. The story is, however, unique in portraying the Assyrian king as the father of the two martyrs.[91] Sennacherib also appears in the Sasanian period stories of Mar Awgin, Mar Qardagh, Mar Mattai, and Mar Behnam. Although these stories often confused his figure, they likely relied upon inherited local traditions as well as the Bible for their memory of this king.[92] Moreover, scholars such as Dorothea Weltecke and others have also shown that, in certain Syriac sources, the medieval Syriac Orthodox Patriarchate likewise portrayed the ancient Assyrians as the ancestors of the Christians in Upper Mesopotamia.[22]

The 7th-century Assyrian History of Mar Qardagh made the titular saint, Mar Qardagh, out to be a descendant of the legendary Biblical Mesopotamian king Nimrod and the historical Sennacherib, with his illustrious descent manifesting in Mar Qardagh's mastery of archery, hunting and polo.[93] A sanctuary constructed for Mar Qardagh during this time was built directly on top of the ruins of a Neo-Assyrian temple.[94] The legendary figure Nimrod, otherwise traditionally viewed as simply Mesopotamian, is explicitly referred to as Assyrian in many of the Sasanian-period texts and is inserted into the line of Assyrian kings.[89] Nimrod, as well as other legendary Mesopotamian (though explicitly Assyrian in the texts) rulers, such as Belus and Ninus, sometimes play significant roles in the writings.[95] Certain Christian texts considered the Biblical figure Balaam to have prophesied the Star of Bethlehem; a local Assyrian version of this narrative appears in some Syriac-language writings from the Sasanian period, which allege that Balaam's prophecy was remembered only through being transmitted through the ancient Assyrian kings.[96] In some stories, explicit claims of descent are made. According to the 6th-century History of Karka, twelve of the noble families of Karka (ancient Arrapha) were descendants of ancient Assyrian nobility who lived in the city during the time of Sargon II.[97] The goal of this specific Syriac text was to demonstrate that the past continued to the present without break, and hence, it begins with the pious king Sargon, who built the city and enacted the fast of Ninevites, and ends with the Assyrian martyrs who made it a blessed field for Christianity.[98] Later on, the bishop of Karka d-Bet Selok, who was influenced by this story, Sabrisho, implemented the Fast of the Ninevites in efforts to act like the righteous king Sargon, who was the first to listen to Jonah's message. With this, the story of Jonah acted as a way to link Syriac Christians with a local Assyrian past.[99] Generally, Syriac Christians of northern Mesopotamia were fascinated with the story of Jonah, and some Syriac works implied that the Ninevites, their alleged Assyrian ancestors, were the first Gentile converts to Christianity, as Jonah prefigured Christ.[100]

Citadel of Karka d-Bet Selok (Kirkuk) in modern day Iraq

To account for the appearance of Assyrian figures like Sennacherib and Esarhaddon in these Syriac texts, scholars have argued that oral, folkloric memories of the ancient Assyrians continued in regions such as Arbela, Nineveh, and Assur. Thus, although the Assyrian state collapsed, the memories of such ancient kings loomed large in the Assyrian heartland, and ruins in the region were attributed to ancient Assyrians.[101] In places such as Nisibis, Arbela, and Karka d-Bet Selokh, these ruins of old encouraged links between the Syriac Christians and the ancient Assyrians, causing distant antiquity and Christian martyrdom to form the basis for the developed histories of these areas.[102] Local communities in northern Mesopotamia commemorated the memory of a great past they called ʾāthor (Assyria), with Syriac Christians recognizing such ruins as the works of their ancestors, even if the exact historical details of the empire had been forgotten. Rituals and rites of Assyrian origin also continued to be practiced deep into late antiquity, likely connecting their practitioners to a distant past through stories and ideas that were passed down. Syriac authors acknowledged this tradition and reinforced these ideas with validity by creating new literary narratives in a landscape already rich with meaning.[103] The newly Christian inhabitants of Assyria and Babylonia during the 3rd and 4th centuries were largely the same pagan population of the Assyro-Babylonian empires and were the successors of this cultural background. In keeping with this background, they developed a personal approach to their Christian faith, retaining some knowledge from their past, particularly Assyrian traditions.[104][105] So when Christianity spread to Adiabene, church leaders purposely suppressed some customs continuing from Assyria's imperial period, but at the same time, they integrated memories of Assyria into their emerging stories with the goal of forging a Christian identity compatible with local traditions.[106] According to East Syrian synodical documents, Assyria was transformed into an archdiocese, and its bishop of Adiabene centered in Arbel, bore the title "Metropolitan of the Assyrians."[107][108] The archbishopric of Adiabene, in this context should be understood in its Hellenic and Parthian boundaries, which extended to the Khabur River, and not the region only between the Greater and Lesser Zab.[109] Hence, by late antiquity, Syriac-speaking authors in Adiabene were positing that they, as Assyrians, were descended from the ancient Assyrians.[110] A reason as to why the term "Syrian" as a self-identity is not explicitly found within these texts is possibly due to the Syrians being seen as meek people in the Sasanian regions, and thus it is unsurprising that these hagiographers sometimes avoided the term.[111] Syriac Christians who lived within metropolitan regions of Beth Garmai, Adiabene, and Mosul of northern Mesopotamia often turned to the Assyrian past to narrate themselves as its heirs in their efforts to include themselves in the political spheres of the Sasanian empire and to present themselves as the natives of the land, descending from a distinctly Assyrian population, in contrast with their fellow Zoroastrians.[112][113] Survival of references to ancient Assyria in late antique and medieval Syriac sources are common, with Fergus Millar noting that Syriac Christians who lived in what was once ancient Assyria did not suffer a 'historical amnesia,' retaining awareness of their Assyrian origins and the history of their native region.[114] Comparative to southern Mesopotamia, which felt no connection with Babylonian continuity, the Christians of northern Mesopotamia employed the terms Assyria and Assyrians to identify themselves and developed notions that they were connected to the Assyrians of antiquity through various tales.[100] The hagiography of Mar Qardagh reveals the outlook of a writer who considered the nobles of Adiabene to be of a local Assyrian origin,[115] and the story of Mor Behnam serves to assign Syriac Christians origins more deeply into antiquity, connecting them with the ancient Assyrians.[116] Syriac writers institutionalized narratives of Christianized Assyrians such as those of Behnam, Qardagh, and Karka d'Bet-Selok into their collective memory of the Assyrian past, using them as a means to self-identify as a Christianized Assyrian community to foreigners. These tales and their accompanying festivals were also read and practiced annually by both elites and commoners to celebrate and honor such martyrs. As a result, Christianized Assyrians remained prominent figures in Syriac Christian communities long after these texts were composed, serving as a living link to their ancestry.[117] What is particularly striking is that the hagiographers of legends as those of Behnam and Qardagh felt the need to include their Assyrian ancestry, when their Zoroastrian background alone would have sufficed. These Assyrian martyrs were considered by the Syriac authors of their tales to be the true children of the ancient Mesopotamians. Qardagh's hagiography and his recognition as an Assyrian plays a key role in defining the identity of the Church of the East, which, by at least the seventh century, openly professed its Assyrian heritage.[118] The memory of Assyria and of its rulership was not only alive, but used by the Church of the East as an identity marker in a Zoroastrian milieu.[119] Timothy I expresses this while justifying claiming a pre-eminent position for his Episcopal See by employing a polemical use of history and geography. He asserts the status of the East by focusing on its claims to antiquity, arguing it was the origin of monarchy and civilization through the biblical king Nimrod, who is associated with Akkad, Assyria, and Nineveh. These sections shed some light on the ethnicity of the Church of the East, although no particular national names are used. Timothy also focuses on its importance as an Old Testament site, through Abraham, and emphasizes that the East was the first to accept the message of Christ. For him, Mesopotamia was the natural home of Christianity, since Seleucia-Ctesiphon also stood at the crossroads of trade routes between East and West.[120][121][122] Within Timothy's letters, an Assyrian ethnos is thus clearly portrayed.[107]

Painting of the Mesopotamian king Nimrod

The biblical king Nimrod is also of great importance for the identity formation among both East and West Syrians. Several Syriac writers hold a positive view of him, and despite Nimrod being overwhelmingly considered a depraved figure in other Christian literature, the Syriac tradition holds a confident view of him. Some of those who purported this image included, but were not limited to, Ephrem the Syrian, Jacob Serugh, and Narsai.[123] Although some have suggested this positive view derives from a defunct, unwritten, Jewish tradition in Mesopotamia, this is hardly a viable theory. The development of this position on Nimrod appears to be an internal development within the Syriac and a form of local patriotism by Syriac Christians, and it is because Nimrod had become a cultural hero and a foundational figure among the Christians of upper Mesopotamia that they supplanted the negative view of him for a positive one. The biblical foundations that Nimrod created in Genesis 10:10-12 were associated with the important urban centers of northern Mesopotamia, such as Nisibis and Edessa, by these authors.[124] His unusual role as a positive foundational figure contributed to a sense of a "Syrian" ethnicity and played a significant role in their supposed claims of descent.[125][126] The position Nimrod played in creating a distinctive identity for Syriac Christians in Mesopotamia also finds appeals to him as a direct ancestral figure. The fact that the inhabitants of this geographical area considered themselves to be Nimrod's descendants is perhaps expressed most vividly in the Acts of Mar Mari, whose author declares the Syriac Christians within the region as "The sons of the powerful Nimrod" (bnay Nemrud gabārā).[127] Syriac Christians also bore the name of Nimrod himself.[127] Nimrod is also often identified with the mythical Assyrian king Ninus by Jacob of Edessa and many other Syriac writers.[128] Likewise, Ephrem also declares the ancient Assyrians to be "the race of Nimrod."[129] Ephrem in particular seems to stress the importance of his region and its connection with Nimrod, identifying him with the northern Mesopotamian territories and ascribing his biblical foundations to known cities in the region. This is perhaps one of the signs of an ethnic community, being geography and a link to a territory, but at least, his positive view of Nimrod, who reigned in his own land, is conspicuous.[130] In general, the foundation of cities by various civic developers such as Nimrod, Belus, Semiramis, and Belochus all appear within the Syriac literature. The northern Mesopotamian Christian centers being founded by various Assyrian and Babylonian figures was interwoven into the writing of multiple Syriac writers potentially in efforts to boost their national identity, ascertaining to a form of nationalism, as these were some of the most important sites for Syriac Christianity.[131][132] Syriac authors endowed Nimrod with a positive image, and the cities he established were replaced by cities familiar to them in northern and southern Mesopotamia. He was recast from a biblical figure into a founding hero, coming to embody a memory of the local Mesopotamian past for Syriac Christians.[133]

The Classical Syriac Language

Among West Syrians, the results of the Leiden project have argued that the Syriac Orthodox have been continuously reconstructing their past since their inception as a Christian community in hopes of legitimizing their existence as a distinct group.[134] Before 451 AD, the Syriac Orthodox did not have the 6 features of an ethnic community as defined by Hutchinson and Smith. Syriac-speaking Miaphysites could not claim a myth of common ancestry or even features of a culture and had no proper name to express their community.[135] But even after the Syriac Church became independent, from 451 to the middle of the seventh century, Syriac writers were primarily concerned with validating the status of Syriac Christianity. Only later on during contacts with Islam did the Syriac Christians start to question and define what their identity really was, based on cultural traditions and sources of their time. Language, which was one of the strongest features of communal identity, became very important, but only after some time. A reason why there is a great attachment to Aramaic is that it was considered by Syriac writers to be the divine language, used by Jesus on Earth.[136] As soon as Syriac became a symbol of religious recognition that was becoming an ethnic community, it allowed Syriac Christians to turn to an ancient past in hopes of defining themselves. They reasoned that the Assyrians and Babylonians spoke Syriac, which was Aramaic, and hence they were a part of the Syrian people. This is a process of social identity construction, and one should not think of ancient fault lines here.[137] Therefore some Syrians, including the Syriac Orthodox tradition, eventually ethnicized their confessional identity and connected themselves to the ancient ethnonym ‘Assyrian’ in their historiographical traditions.[138] This idea started as early as Severus Sebokht, who marked astronomy as one of the cornerstones of civilization and who identified the ancient peoples of modern-day Iraq as suryāyē (Syrians) in his discourse against the Greeks.[139] Jacob of Edessa, Severus's disciple, also stressed that the Assyrian kings, or synonymously, Chaldean kings, were the ancestors of the Syrians and that they belonged to "our tongue."[140] Jacob also aimed to prove, according to the Greek books, that "empires arose from our people more powerful than all the empires of their times."[136] Later on, Dionysius, inspired by Jacob's arguments, also wrote about the identity of the Syrians. He used the Old Testament to demonstrate that the Syrians were a people with a prestigious history and many kings in Damascus, Babylonia, Assyria, and Edessa. He aimed to demonstrate a continuous existence of a Syrian empire, and thus considered the Assyrians and Chaldeans as belonging to the people of the Syrians. Dionysius's conception of a Syrian identity was rooted in territory, language, and history of kingship. His arguments paved the way for other Syriac authors to form their own ethnic arguments, like Michael.[141][142][143] Dionysius also recognized that the Syrians east of the Euphrates were termed such in a metaphorical way, and that they held the kings of Assyria, Babylon and Edessa, also believing these Syrians were Mesopotamians, distinct from those in Syria proper which was the west of the Euphrates.[144] The sense of a Syrian identity dating back to antiquity based on language is notably expressed by Michael, who counted 194 kings for the Syrians, including the Assyrians and Babylonians within this list.[136] For him, the Aramaic language was the common connection between the Babylonians, Assyrians, and the various Aramean principalities. It was a tool for him to prove the historical identity of the Syrians against his opponents, who claimed the Syrians had no kings.[145] However, this does not mean that Michael's views of the Syriac Orthodox was not ethnic. In fact, language is used to prove common descent.[146] Michael recognized that both the Arameans and Assyrians were called Syrians and that they were both the forebearers of the Syriac tradition,[147] but distinguished them. The "Syrians" east of the Euphrates were called such metaphorically and were putatively descended from the Assyrians and Babylonians. Despite the prominence of Edessa, he continued to maintain that the Syrians, in the proper sense, were most specifically those west of the Euphrates who traced descent from the Arameans.[148][149] Michael also explicitly offers a passage where he declares the Assyrians to be the Syrians while listing the sons of Shem, which is believed to derive from an earlier lost work of a Syriac writer during the reign of Abd al-Malik, who mentioned the Assyrians and likewise equated them to the Syrians in his list of the sons of Shem.[150] The Chronicle of 1234 also shares many similarities with Michael's list, the most significant being is that both Syriac witnesses equate the Assyrians to the Syrians while mentioning those people who are literate in the world.[151] Patriarch Philoxenus I Nemrud and his cousin, the priest Nebuchadnezzar, had names that harkened back to the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian kings. These choices were certainly inspired by Michael's historical vision, which held the ancient Mesopotamians to be Syrians.[152] The name of king Sargon is also attested in Syriac Christians from the 7th century onwards, appearing in the personal names of a priest named Sargon and another, Autel, son of Sargon. The father of John of Damascus, Sarjun Ibn Mansur, was also titled after the ancient king. Likewise with the names Nemrud and Nebuchadnezzar, these were likely attempts to link themselves with a pre-Christian Assyrian past.[153][154][155] According to the Syriac understanding of ancient history, centered on the idea that there were powerful "Syrian" kingdoms on both sides of the Euphrates and that the Syriac Orthodox had their own sovereign kings, as presented by Jacob, Dionysius, and Michael, the Seleucids were therefore also considered local Syrian kings in the ancient sense of the word. Since Alexander conquered Persia, which had previously conquered the Mesopotamian kingdoms that these authors referred to as "Syrian" kingdoms, the Seleucids were viewed as restorers of local Syrian royalty. Therefore, they were regarded as "Syrians" by Syriac authors who aimed to demonstrate their historical heritage. Alexander, although Greek, was considered native. This explains the development of a hybrid Syrian identity based on the usage of Aramaic but marked by Greek culture.[156] Bar Ebroyo's Chronicle also sheds some light on identity. His source, Michael, had identified both the Assyrians and Arameans as the ancestors of the Syrians, grouping them under the term "Chaldean." Bar Ebroyo removes difficulties in the identification of the old Mesopotamians and uses the term "ancient Syrians," which included ancient speakers of Aramaic from Syria, Assyria, and Babylon. He explicitly identifies the Chaldean kings with these ancient Syrians, calling them by this term. Bar Ebroyo connected the Syriac Orthodox to the Ancient Near Eastern Empires using neutral terms like "ancient Syrians" and "our Syrians" to avoid the debate about the "true Syrians" discussed by Michael.[157][158] Claims of an autonomous past for Syrians, like those made by Dionysius Telmahroyo, seem to have been accepted by Arab authors, particularly Masudi, who mentions that the kings of Nineveh and Mosul were Syrians. They had now constituted a nation, analogous to the Romans, Arabs, and Persians in his view.[159] Both the Assyrian and Aramean pasts furnished Syriac Christians with ancestral narratives that could define them as linguistically, territorially, or theologically legible to more powerful audiences. The Aramean past offered a spatial orientation to the west in Syria, while the Assyrian past offered a link to Mesopotamia eastward.[147] Thus, Syriac-speaking authors, both Syriac Orthodox and from the Church of the East, considered themselves not the stock of conquered peoples but of empire builders and great victors.[160] This was a process that gradually crystallized based on available sources of their time, but by at least the 12th century, the Syriac Orthodox were aware of having a core composed of the cultural traditions of the Assyrians and Arameans.[161]

Michael was the first writer to acknowledge community on a larger scale, counting East Syrians as part of his people. Theologically, he distinguished his community from the East Syrians, but in times of hardship, he grouped West and East Syrians all under the ethnic term "Syrian." East Syrian pre-Christian history and early Christian history were treated as the history of his own community by Michael, and he reflects a conscious group identity with East Syrians based on common name, ancestry, memories, language, regional culture, and to an extent, also a common homeland and solidarity between the two groups.[162] Michael's predecessors also acknowledged linguistic unity and at times shared cultural elements between both Syrian groups, but they were less pronounced ideas compared to Michael.[163] This idea of unity with East Syrians was also expressed by Dionysius of Tel Mahre, although to a lesser extent, who became aware of a homeland and started to look for a common name. Dionysius represents the final phase of a gradual development to a common community.[164] Various Syriac sources also indicate that East and West Syrians lived in the same regions and cities, in fact, there was also an increase in contact and shared use between the two groups literary traditions. Eliya of Nisibis for example, used West Syrian sources, and this exchange of knowledge can be seen in various genres of Syriac literature.[165] Bar Ebroyo, too, considered East Syrians to be of the same people as his community. He clearly indicated that anyone who speaks or spoke Aramaic belonged to his community, with his homeland being Mesopotamia, including the region east of the Tigris. In this way, Bar Ebroyo tactically included East Syrians in his general "Syrian" terminology and even dedicated a section in his works to mentioning the patriarchs of the Church of the East.[165]

## Modern identity and nationalism

[edit]

See also: Assyrian nationalism

### 19th century identities and developments

[edit]

Austen Henry Layard (1817–1894), credited with the popularization of Assyrian continuity in western academia

Early travellers and missionaries in northern Mesopotamia in the 19th century observed connections between the indigenous Christian population and the ancient Assyrians. The British traveller Claudius Rich (1787–1821) referenced "Assyrian Christians" in Narrative of a Residence in Koordistan and on the site of Ancient Nineveh (published posthumously in 1836, though describing an 1820 journey). It is just possible that Rich considered "Assyrian" a geographic, rather than ethnic, term since he in a footnote on the same page also referenced the "Christians of Assyria". More clear-cut evidence of Assyrian self-identity in the 19th century can be seen in the writings of the American missionary Horatio Southgate (1812–1894). In Southgate's Narrative of a Visit to the Syrian [Jacobite] Church of Mesopotamia (1844) he remarked with surprise that Armenians referred to the Syriac Christians as Assouri, which Southgate associated with the English "Assyrians", rather than Syriani, which he himself had been using.[166] It seems that the Assyrian identification had been in use for several decades before Layard's excavation, such as in Kharput, but also even the Syriac Orthodox Church in Constantinople bore the name "Assyrian Orthodox" as early as 1844. Early Jacobites found it conventional to use the English "Assyrian" to translate emic sūryōyō and its equivalents in other languages.[16] Armenian and Georgian sources have since antiquity consistently referred to Assyrians as Assouri or Asori, and similarly Medieval Arab writers named the Christians of Northern Mesopotamia as "Ashuriyun".[167][166] Southgate also mentioned that the Syriac Christians themselves at this point claimed origin from the ancient Assyrians as "sons of Assour". Southgate's account thus demonstrates that modern Assyrians still claimed ancient Assyrian descent already in the early 19th century, a period prior to the great archaeological discoveries of the mid to late 19th century.[166] Despite the survival of Assyrian self-ascription among some villages in the Syriac Orthodox heartland, even in areas that had never encountered missionaries or archeologists, the majority identified primarily as sūryōye.[147]

Connections between the modern population and ancient Assyrians were further popularized in the west and academia by the British archaeologist and traveller Austen Henry Layard (1817–1894), responsible for the early excavations of several major ancient Assyrian sites, such as Nimrud. In Nineveh and its Remains (1849), Layard argued that the Christians he met in northern Mesopotamia and southeast Anatolia claimed to be "descendants of the ancient Assyrians". It is possible that Layard's knowledge of them as such derived from his partnership with the local Assyrian archaeologist Hormuzd Rassam (1826–1910).[166]

Towards the end of the 19th century, a so-called "religious renaissance" or "awakening" took place in Urmia, Iran. Perhaps partly encouraged by Anglican, Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox missionary efforts, the concepts of nation and nationalism were introduced to the Assyrians in Urmia, who began to revive the term ʾāthorāyā as a self-identity, and began building a national ideology more heavily based around ancient Assyria than Christianity. This was not an isolated phenomenon: Middle Eastern nationalism, probably influenced by developments in Europe, also began to be strongly expressed in other communities during this time, such as among the Armenians, Arabs, Kurds, Pontic Greeks, Maronites, Jews and Turks. This time also saw the development of Literary Urmia Aramaic, a new literary language based on the at the time spoken Neo-Aramaic dialects. Through the promotion of an identity rooted in ancient Assyria, various communities could transcend their denominational differences and unite under one national identity.[20] Overall, the connection to the Assyrians of antiquity was certainly stimulated by ancient traditions in Syriac literature which linked the Syrians with the empires of biblical times, that of the Assyrians and Babylonians.[168]

### Contemporary identities and name debate

[edit]

See also: Terms for Syriac Christians

Freydun Atturaya (1891–1926), a prominent early Assyrian nationalist

In the years before World War I, several prominent East Aramaic-language authors and intellectuals promoted Assyrian nationalism. Among them were Freydun Atturaya (1891–1926), who in 1911 published an influential article titled Who are the Syrians [surayē]? How is Our Nation to Be Raised Up?, in which he pointed out the connection between surayē and "Assyrian" and argued for the adoption of ʾāthorāyā. The early 20th century saw an increase in the use of the term ʾāthorāyā as a self-identity. Also used as the neologism ʾasurāyā, perhaps inspired by the Armenian Asori.[20] The adoption of ʾāthorāyā and a stronger association with ancient Assyria through nationalism is not a unique development in regard to the Assyrians. Greeks, for instance, due to associating the term "Hellene" with the pagan religion, overwhelmingly self-identified as Romans (Rhōmioi)[169] up until nationalism around the time of the Greek War of Independence, when a more strong association with Ancient Greece spread among the populace.[170][171] Today, sūryōyō or sūrāyā are the predominant self-designations used by Assyrians in their native language, though they are typically translated as "Assyrian" rather than "Syrian".[172]

Today, as a consequence of World War I, the Sayfo (Assyrian genocide) and various other massacres, a majority of the Assyrians have been displaced from their homeland, and today they live in diaspora communities in countries such as Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Greece, Australia, New Zealand and the United States. In the aftermath of these events, explicit Assyrian self-identity became even more widespread and established in their communities, not only in order to unify communities in the diaspora (which often originated in different regions) but also because "Syrian" became internationally established as the demonym of the newly created country of Syria.[173] Many Assyrians who were not members of the Assyrian Church of the East also embraced Assyrian nationalism, such as D. B. Perley (1901–1979), who in 1933 helped found the Assyrian National Federation and religiously identified himself as a Syriac Orthodox Christian but ethnically identified himself as an Assyrian. In 1935, Perley wrote that "The Assyrians, although representing but one single nation as the direct heirs of the ancient Assyrian Empire … are now doctrinally divided … No one can coherently understand the Assyrians as a whole until he can distinguish that which is religion or church from that which is nation …" and even proposed uniting all Assyrians under a single patriarch of the Church of the East.[1]

Patriarch Ignatius Aphrem I (patriarch 1933–1957) of the Syriac Orthodox Church, once promoter of the Assyrian identity, while later rejecting it for the followers of his church after the Simele massacre

For communities that identify themselves as Assyrian, Assyrian continuity forms a key part of their self-identity. Many modern Assyrians are named after ancient Mesopotamian figures, such as Sargon, Sennacherib and Nebuchadnezzar (and indeed many Assyrian family names still link to ancient Mesopotamian names), and the modern Assyrian flag displays symbolism which is derived from ancient Assyria.[1] From the second half of the 20th century to the present, Assyrians, particularly in the diaspora, have continued to promote Assyrian nationalism as a unifying force among their people. Some denominational groups have opposed being lumped in as "Assyrians" and as a result, they have founded counter-movements of their own;[1] the so-called "name debate" is still a hotly discussed topic within Syriac Christian communities today, especially in the diaspora which lives outside the Assyrian homeland.[174]

Followers of the Assyrian Church of the East have historically most often been exposed to cultural influences from Iran whereas followers of the Syriac Orthodox Church have been exposed to cultural influences from Greece.[6] In the Syriac Orthodox Church, officials have been important part of advancing secular Assyrianism, then later reducing it by creating of separate "Syrian"[b] or "Arameans" identities. For instance, Patriarch Ignatius Aphrem I (then bishop, later patriarch between 1933 and 1957) was a part of the Assyrian Delegation to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, which asked for a homeland for the Assyrian people. The patriarchal residence was later moved to Syria and after the Simele massacre, Ignatius Aphrem I took an anti-Assyrian stance due to fear of persecution, which came to influence the religious mindset of the Syriac Orthodox community. The church was then called the Assyrian Apostolic Church of Antioch in the United States, a name Ignatius Aphrem I came to change to the Syrian Orthodox.[175][176] In 1981, Patriarch Ignatius Zakka I advocated Syriac identity over both Assyrian and Aramean identity.[1] More recently, many Syriac Orthodox adherents have preferred to identify themselves as "Syriac" in English (the name of their church and the liturgical language and an alternate transliteration of suryayā), some identifying as Syriac and Assyrian or Aramean interchangeably. Some members of the Chaldean Catholic Church, "Chaldeans", have also lobbied for recognition as a distinct group in recent times.[177] Modern international organizations generally do not recognize Assyrians, Syriacs, Arameans and Chaldeans as members of different ethnic groups, instead, they merely consider these names alternate names for Assyrians[21] and numerous church leaders have also affirmed that they belong to the same ethnic group, albeit to different Christian denominations.[178]

## Other forms of continuity

[edit]

The city of Erbil (ancient Arbela), today the de facto capital of the autonomous Kurdistan Region in Iraq, has been continuously inhabited since the days of the Neo-Assyrian Empire

In addition to continuity in self-designation and self-perception, there continued to be important continuities between ancient and contemporary Mesopotamia in terms of religion, literary culture and settlement well after the post-imperial period.[94]

### Assyrian settlements

[edit]

Assyrian settlements continued to be occupied into the Christian period. The ancient capital of Nineveh, for instance, became the seat of a bishop, the Bishop of Nineveh, and a church (later converted to a mosque under Islamic rule) was built on top of the ruins of an ancient Assyrian palace. The main population center in the city gradually shifted to the opposite bank of the river, which became the city today known as Mosul; ancient Nineveh only gradually fell into ruin and eventually became open countryside.[28] Though most of the old population centers were similarly gradually abandoned and fell into ruin some also endured. The ancient city of Arbela, today known as Erbil, has been continuously inhabited since the time of the Neo-Assyrian Empire.[179]

### Religion

[edit]

Although the ancient Mesopotamian pantheon ceased to be worshipped at Assur with the city's destruction in the 3rd century AD, it persisted at other localities, despite the overwhelming conversion of the region to Christianity, for much longer; the old faith persisted at Harran until at least the 10th century and at Mardin until as late as the 18th century.[180]

Map of modern Assyrian Aramaic dialects

The Fast of Nineveh is a three-day fast commemorating the repentance of the Ninevites at the hands of Jonah and is found in all of the traditional churches of modern Assyrians, such as the Syriac Orthodox Church, Assyrian Church of the East and Chaldean Catholic Church. This fast is unique to the Assyrian Christian community and connects to its ancient heritage.[181]

Nusardil (Feast of God) is another religious festival found across all three churches and is usually celebrated in July. Following the holy mass, members of the community throw water at each other in an act of cleansing the path of God. This tradition likely finds its origins in ancient Assyrian and Mesopotamian rituals, such as the New Year.[181] Such festivals, among others found locally in the Assyrian community, served to adapt to Christian needs but also to recall the ancient Assyrian heritage, acting as a link to a pre-Christian past.[182]

### Language

[edit]

Line drawing of an Assyrian lion weight once belonging to the king Shalmaneser V (r. 727–722 BC). The weight is inscribed in both Akkadian and Aramaic.

In the wake of the Late Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BC, Aramean tribes began to migrate into Assyrian territory. In the first millennium BC, Aramean influence on Assyria grew greater and greater, owing to further migrations as well as mass deportations enacted by several Assyrian kings.[3] Though the expansion of the Assyrian Empire, in combination with resettlements and deportations, changed the ethno-cultural make-up of the Assyrian heartland, there is no evidence to suggest that the more ancient Assyrian inhabitants of the land ever disappeared or became restricted to a small elite, nor that the ethnic and cultural identity of the new settlers was anything other than "Assyrian" after one or two generations.[2]

Because the Assyrians never imposed their language on foreign peoples whose lands they conquered outside of the Assyrian heartland, there were no mechanisms in place to stop the spread of languages other than Akkadian. Beginning with the migrations of Aramaic-speaking settlers into Assyrian territory during the Middle Assyrian period, this lack of linguistic policies facilitated the spread of the Aramaic language.[183] As the most widely spoken and mutually understandable of the Semitic languages (the language group containing many of the languages spoken through the empire),[184] Aramaic grew in importance throughout the Neo-Assyrian period and increasingly replaced the Akkadian language even within the Assyrian heartland itself.[185][11] From the 9th century BC onwards, Aramaic became the de facto lingua franca, with Akkadian becoming relegated to a language of the political elite (i.e. governors and officials).[183]

The widespread adoption of the language does not indicate a wholesale replacement of the original native population; the Aramaic language was used not only by settlers but also by native Assyrians, who adopted it and its alphabetic script.[3] The Aramaic language had entered the Assyrian royal administration by the reign of Shalmaneser III (r. 859–824 BC), given that Aramaic writings are known from a palace he built in Nimrud.[11] By the time of Tiglath-Pileser III (r. 745–727 BC), the Assyrian kings employed both Akkadian and Aramaic-language royal scribes, confirming the rise of Aramaic to a position of an official language used by the imperial administration.[11][12] It is clear that Aramaic was spoken by the Assyrian royal family from at least the late 8th century BC onwards, given that Tiglath-Pileser's son Shalmaneser V (r. 727–722 BC) owned a set of lion weights inscribed with text in both Akkadian and Aramaic.[12] A recorded drop in the number of cuneiform documents late in the reign of Ashurbanipal (r. 669–631 BC) could indicate a greater shift to Aramaic, often written on perishable materials like leather scrolls or papyrus,[183] though it could perhaps alternatively be attributed to political instability in the empire.[186] The denizens of Assur and other former Assyrian population centers under Parthian rule, who clearly connected themselves to ancient Assyria, wrote and spoke Aramaic.[52]

Though modern Assyrian languages, most prominently the Suret language, are Neo-Aramaic languages with little resemblance to the old Akkadian language,[187] they are not wholly without Akkadian influence. Most notably there are numerous examples of Akkadian loanwords in both ancient and modern Aramaic languages.[188] This connection was noted already in 1974, when a study by Stephen A. Kaufman found that the Syriac language, an Aramaic dialect today mainly used liturgical language, has at least fourteen exclusive (i.e. not attested in other dialects) loanwords from Akkadian, including nine of which are clearly from the ancient Assyrian dialect (six of which are architectural or topographical terms).[189] A 2011 study by Kathleen Abraham and Michael Sokoloff on 282 words previously believed to have been Aramaic loanwords in Akkadian determined that many such cases were questionable, and also found that 15 of those words were actually Akkadian loanwords in Aramaic and that the direction of the loan could not be determined in 22 cases; Abraham's and Sokoloff's conclusion was that the number of loanwords from Akkadian to Aramaic was far larger than the number of loanwords from Aramaic to Akkadian.[190] Elements of Neo-Assyrian Akkadian survived the fall of the empire, with the language imparting a noticeable lexical heritage on certain varieties of Aramaic which were present in the northern Mesopotamia area.[191] Akkadian is the underlying substrate of multiple modern Syriac phenomena, some of which have managed to survive four-thousand years, and both languages can help to decipher each other in their linguistics at times.[192]

## Academia and politics

[edit]

The use of the Assyrian name by modern Assyrians has historically led to controversy and misunderstanding, not only within but also outside the Assyrian community.[174] Discussions on the connection between the modern and ancient Assyrians have also entered into academia.[174] In addition to support by prominent historical Assyriologists, such as Austen Henry Layard[166] and Sidney Smith,[32] Assyrian continuity enjoys wide support within contemporary Assyriology. Among proponents of continuity are prominent Assyriologists such as Simo Parpola,[174][193] Robert D. Biggs,[194] H. W. F. Saggs,[195] Georges Roux,[196] J. A. Brinkman,[197] Mirko Novák,[2][198] and Robert Rollinger.[199][200] Historians of other fields have also supported Assyrian continuity, such as Richard Nelson Frye,[201] Philip K. Hitti,[202] Patricia Crone,[203] Michael Cook,[203] Mordechai Nisan,[204] Aryo Makko,[205] Helen Younansardaroud,[198] Onver A. Cetrez,[206] Racho Donef,[207] Geoffrey Khan,[208] Eden Naby,[182] Cynthia Jean,[209] Andreas D. Boldt,[10] Amar Annus,[210] Artur Boháč,[211] John MacGinnnis,[212][213] and Joshua J. Mark (contributor of the World History Encyclopedia).[214] Other scholars supporting continuity include, among others, the linguist Judah Segal,[215] the political scientist James Jupp,[216] the genocide researcher Hannibal Travis,[217][218] alongside the political scientist and genocide researcher Adam Jones,[23] and the geneticists Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Paolo Menozzi, Alberto Piazza,[219] Mohammad Taghi Akbari, Sunder S. Papiha, Derek Frank Roberts and Dariush Farhud.[220] Numerous scholars who themselves are of Assyrian origin, such as Efrem Yildiz,[221] Sargon Donabed,[222] Odisho Malko Gewargis,[223] Edward Y. Odisho,[224] Konstantine Matveef,[225] Shamiran Mako,[226] Fuat Deniz,[227] Helen Malko,[181] and William Piroyan,[182] Amir Harrak,[228] Hirmis Aboona,[229] Nicholas Al-Jeloo,[230] and Zack Cherry[231] have also published academic works and lectures in support of Assyrian continuity.[221][222][223]

Some academics, most notably the historians J.F. Coakley,[174] John Joseph, David Wilmshurst and Adam H. Becker, have opposed continuity between modern and ancient Assyrians, typically arguing that modern Assyrian identity only emerged in the middle to late 19th century as a consequence of interactions with foreign missionaries and/or the discovery of ancient Assyrian ruins.[232][233] Wholesale opposition of Assyrian continuity is not reflected within Assyriology. Karen Radner considers Assyrian continuity to still be a matter of debate, but also opposes the idea that Assyrian identity only emerged in the 19th century, noting that modern Christians in northern Mesopotamia saw themselves as descendants of the ancient Assyrians long before the discovery of ancient sites and visits by foreign missionaries,[58] as can for instance be gathered from the accounts of Horatio Postgate.[166] Due to the efforts of many scholars in diverse fields of study, such a denial of Assyrian continuity has become increasingly difficult to sustain in academia.[234] Some opponents to Assyrian continuity, such as Becker, have argued that the rich Christian literature from the Sasanian period connecting with ancient Assyria was simply based on the Bible, rather than actual remembrance of ancient Assyria,[94] despite several figures appearing in the tales, such as Esarhaddon and Sargon II, barely being mentioned in the Bible.[c] The texts are also very much a local Assyrian phenomenon, given that the historical accounts presented in them are at odds with those of other historical writings of the Sasanian Empire.[236] The use of Assyria and Assyrians in Syriac texts is not fundamentally the product of an invention based on foreign or biblical sources, but rather a reinterpretation of the Syriac Christian past founded on local histories and memories that encountered Roman and Christian texts, which were fused with them.[85]

Names clearly reminiscent of those used by Assyrians in the Neo-Assyrian Empire continued to be used at Assur throughout the post-imperial period, at least until the 3rd century AD.[54] Some opponents to Assyrian continuity, such as David Wilmshurst, hold that ancient Assyrian names ceased being used in the Christian period and that this in turn was evidence of a lack of continuity.[237] There is some evidence of continued use of names with explicit ancient Mesopotamian connections in the Christian period; Arabic-language records from 13th-century Rumkale for instance record a man by the name Nebuchadnezzar (rendered Bukthanaṣar in the Arabic text), a relative of a Patriarch of the Syriac Orthodox Church named Philoxenus Nemrud (also a name with ancient Assyrian connections, deriving either from Nimrud or Nimrod); both of these names are also however mentioned in the Bible.[238] Modern Assyrian authors, such as Odisho Malko Gewargis, contend that a decrease in ancient pagan names invoking gods such as Ashur, Nabu and Sîn is hardly surprising given the Christianization of the Assyrians; similar cases of native names being increasingly replaced by Biblically derived names are also known from numerous other Christianized peoples.[223]

Modern Assyrians consider opposition to Assyrian continuity to be offensive and associate it with other historical forms of oppression against them. Sargon Donabed, for instance, considers the use of terms such as "Chaldeans", "Syrian", "Syriacs", "Arameans", or more extremely "Arab Christians", "Kurdish Christians" and "Turkish Christians", to be harmful as they add to division and confusion in regard to identity and are "clearly reflective of modern political parlance".[239] These views are partly attributable to the actions of the government in Ba'athist Iraq (1968–2003), which sought to counteract Assyrian demands for autonomy through refusing to recognize Assyrians as a third ethnic minority of the country, instead promoting Assyrians, "Syrians" and Chaldeans as separate peoples, and undercounted Assyrians in censuses; in 1977, it was made impossible to register as Assyrian in the national census and Assyrians were consequently forced to register as Arabs for fear of losing employment and ration cards.[240]

Genetic testing of Assyrian populations is a relatively new field of study, but has hitherto supported continuity from Bronze and Iron Age populations and underlined the notion that Assyrians historically rarely intermarried with surrounding populations.[241] Genetic studies conducted in 2000 and 2008 support Assyrians as genetically distinct from other groups in the Middle East, with high endogamy; this indicates that the community has historically been relatively closed owing to their religious and cultural traditions, with little intermixture with other groups.[242] In a study from 2017 investigating the genetics of various northern Iraqi population groups found that Assyrians and Yezidis clustered together, but away from other population groups in northern Iraq analyzed by the study, with the Iraqi Assyrians being found to be a genetically homogenous and enclosed group of people. According to the study, "contemporary Syriacs and Yazidis from northern Iraq may in fact have a stronger continuity with the original genetic stock of the Mesopotamian people, which possibly provided the basis for the ethnogenesis of various subsequent Near Eastern populations."[243]

## See also

[edit]

* Assyria
* Neo-Assyrian Empire
* Old Assyrian Empire
* Middle Assyrian Empire
* Achaemenid Assyria
* Asoristan
* History of the Assyrians
* Assyrian culture
* Assyrian cuisine
* Assyrian Music
* Assyrian nationalism
* Assyrian Church of the East
* Syriac Orthodox Church
* Chaldean Catholic Church
* Name of Syria
* List of ethnic Assyrians
* Nationalist historiography

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ At the height of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, there were around 20 million Assyrians.[6] Settlers came from Babylonia, the Levant, among other places.[7]
2. ^ Later "Syriac", see below
3. ^ Sargon II was for instance due to being mentioned only once in the Bible long forgotten in western scholarship and was only accepted as a real Assyrian king within Assyriology in the 1860s.[235]

## References

[edit]

1. ^ a b c d e Butts 2017, p. 605.
2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Novák 2016, p. 132.
3. ^ a b c d e f Frahm 2017, p. 7.
4. ^ Biggs 2005, p. 10.
5. ^ a b Saggs 1984, p. 290.
6. ^ a b Parpola 2004, p. 22.
7. ^ Valk 2020, p. 77-103.
8. ^ a b Hauser 2017, p. 240.
9. ^ a b c Frahm, Eckart (2023). "Assyria's Legacy on the Ground". Assyria: The Rise and Fall of the World's First Empire. Basic Books. p. 353\. ISBN 978-1-5416-7440-0
10. ^ a b c Boldt, Andreas D. (2017). Historical Mechanisms: An Experimental Approach to Applying Scientific Theories to the Study of History. Routledge. p. 154\. ISBN 978-1-351-81648-9
11. ^ a b c d Radner 2021, p. 149.
12. ^ a b c Luukko & Van Buylaere 2017, p. 319.
13. ^ Parpola 2004, p. 15.
14. ^ Edmonds, Alexander Johannes (2025). Triumph and Betrayal: Assyria's Path to Empire, 935–745 BC. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. pp. 82–83\. ISBN 9783111593821.
15. ^ a b c Butts 2017, p. 600.
16. ^ a b Makko 2012, p. 298.
17. ^ a b c Benjamen 2022, p. 2.
18. ^ a b Parpola 2004, pp. 16–17.
19. ^ a b Shehadeh 2011, p. 17.
20. ^ a b c d Butts 2017, p. 603.
21. ^ a b Petrosian 2006, pp. 143–144.
22. ^ a b Travis, Hannibal (2017). The Assyrian Genocide: Cultural and Political Legacies. Routledge. p. 6\. ISBN 9781351980258.
23. ^ a b Jones, Adam (2023). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction (4th ed.). Routledge. p. 209\. ISBN 9781032028101.
24. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 192.
25. ^ a b Trolle Larsen 2017, pp. 583–584.
26. ^ Frahm 2017c, p. 560.
27. ^ Kuhrt 1995, p. 239.
28. ^ a b c Reade 2018, p. 286.
29. ^ Dalley 1993, p. 134.
30. ^ Frahm 2017c, pp. 560–561.
31. ^ Dalley 1993, pp. 135–136.
32. ^ a b Smith 1926, p. 69.
33. ^ Radner 2015, p. 20.
34. ^ a b c d Hauser 2017, p. 229.
35. ^ Ponchia & Lanfranchi 2024, p. 525-526.
36. ^ Frahm 2017, p. 5.
37. ^ a b Ponchia & Lanfranchi 2024, p. 526.
38. ^ a b c Kuhrt 1995, p. 240.
39. ^ a b Hauser 2017, p. 230.
40. ^ a b Frahm, Eckart (2023). "Assyria's Legacy on the Ground". Assyria: The Rise and Fall of the World's First Empire. Basic Books. p. 357\. ISBN 978-1-5416-7440-0
41. ^ Koliński, Rafał (2018). "The Post-Assyrian Period in the Eastern Assyria". Alter Orient und Altes Testament. 463 (1): 110.
42. ^ Sanders, Seth L. (2017). From Adapa to Enoch. Mohr Siebeck. p. 155\. ISBN 9783161544569.
43. ^ Simonson, Brandon (2024). "Theophoric Aramaic Personal Names as Onomastic Sequences in Diasporic and Cosmopolitan Communities". In Palamidis, Alaya; Bonnet, Corinne (eds.). What's in a Divine Name?: Religious Systems and Human Agency in the Ancient Mediterranean. de Gruyter. pp. 517–518\. ISBN 9783111326276.
44. ^ Sanders 2017, p. 186.
45. ^ Sanders 2017, p. 195.
46. ^ Ponchia, Simonetta; Lanfranchi, Giovanni (2024). The Neo-Assyrian Empire: A Handbook. de Gruyter. p. 525\. ISBN 9783110690767.
47. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 194.
48. ^ Parpola 1999.
49. ^ Al-Jeloo 2012, p. 475-476.
50. ^ Radner 2015, p. 6.
51. ^ Hauser 2017, p. 238.
52. ^ a b Reade 1998, p. 71.
53. ^ Haider 2008, p. 193.
54. ^ a b Livingstone 2009, p. 154.
55. ^ Haider 2008, p. 197.
56. ^ Radner 2015, p. 19.
57. ^ Harper et al. 1995, p. 18.
58. ^ a b Radner 2015, p. 7.
59. ^ Beaulieu, Paul‐Alain (2017). "Assyria in Late Babylonian Sources". In Frahm, Eckart (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 551–553\. ISBN 9781444335934.
60. ^ Düring 2020, p. 39.
61. ^ Michel 2017, p. 81.
62. ^ Düring 2020, p. 145.
63. ^ Bahrani 2006, pp. 56–57.
64. ^ Dinno, Khalid (2017). "The Synods and Canons in the Syrian (Syriac) Orthodox Church in the Second Millennium: An Overview". The Canadian Society for Syriac Studies. 17 (1): 23.
65. ^ Donabed & Mako 2009, p. 81.
66. ^ Butts 2017, p. 600-601.
67. ^ a b Butts 2017, p. 601.
68. ^ Rollinger 2006, pp. 285–287.
69. ^ Tamari 2019, p. 113.
70. ^ Rollinger 2006, p. 284.
71. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. (2013). Syrian Identity in the Greco-Roman World. Cambridge University Press. p. 6\. ISBN 9780511997808.
72. ^ Frye, Richard N. (1992). "Assyria and Syria: Synonyms". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 51 (4): 283. doi:10.1086/373570.
73. ^ a b c Andrade, Nathanael J. "Assyrians, Syrians and the Greek Language in the Late Hellenistic and Roman Imperial Periods". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 73 (2): 305.
74. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. "Assyrians, Syrians and the Greek Language in the Late Hellenistic and Roman Imperial Periods". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 73 (2): 316.
75. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. (2018). "Syriac and Syrians in the later Roman Empire". In King, Daniel (ed.). The Syriac World. Routledge. p. 160\. ISBN 9781317482116.
76. ^ Payne, Richard E. (2015). A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity. University of California Press. p. 227\. ISBN 978-0-520-29245-1
77. ^ Parpola 2004, pp. 19–20.
78. ^ Yildiz, Efrem (2012). "The Assyrian Linguistic Heritage". In Donabed, Sargon (ed.). The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity and Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 205\. ISBN 9789155483036.
79. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. (2013). Syrian Identity in the Greco-Roman World. Cambridge University Press. pp. 298–299\. ISBN 9780511997808.
80. ^ Parpola, Simo. "The Melammu Project". www.melammu-project.eu.
81. ^ Frahm 2023, p. 399-400.
82. ^ Clément de Blois, François (2002). "Naṣrānī (Ναζωραȋος) and ḥanīf (ἐθνικός): Studies on the Religious Vocabulary of Christianity and of Islam". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 65 (1): 21.
83. ^ a b c Butts 2017, pp. 600–601.
84. ^ Frye, Richard N. (2002). "Mapping Assyria". Ideologies as Intercultural Phenomena (PDF). Ed. Mimesis. p. 77\. ISBN 9788884831071.
85. ^ a b Payne, Richard E. (2021). "Ein iranisches Assyrien. Die Macht der Vergangenheit in der Spätantike". Historische Zeitschrift (in German). 312 (1): 28. doi:10.1515/hzhz-2021-0001. ISSN 2196-680X.
86. ^ Hauser 2017, p. 241.
87. ^ a b c Kalimi & Richardson 2014, p. 5.
88. ^ Payne 2012, pp. 205, 217.
89. ^ a b Payne 2012, p. 214.
90. ^ Payne 2012, p. 209.
91. ^ Mellon Saint-Laurent, Jeanne-Nicole (2018). The History of Mar Behnam and Sarah: Martyrdom and Monasticism in Medieval Iraq. Gorgias Press. p. 2\. ISBN 9781463239145.
92. ^ Holm, Tawny L. (2014). "Memories of Sennacherib in Aramaic Tradition". In Kalimi, Isaac; Richardson, Seth (eds.). Sennacherib at the Gates of Jerusalem: Story, History and Historiography. Brill Publishers. p. 314\. ISBN 9789004265622.
93. ^ Payne 2012, p. 205.
94. ^ a b c Payne 2012, p. 208.
95. ^ Minov 2020, pp. 187, 191.
96. ^ Minov 2020, p. 203.
97. ^ Payne 2012, p. 217.
98. ^ Crone & Cook 1977, pp. 57–58.
99. ^ Becker 2008, pp. 10–11.
100. ^ a b Salvesen, Alison (1998). "The Legacy of Babylon and Nineveh in Aramaic Sources". In Dalley, Stephanie (ed.). The Legacy of Mesopotamia. Oxford University Press. p. 157\. ISBN 9780199291588.
101. ^ Payne, Richard E. (2015). A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity. University of California Press. p. 148\. ISBN 9780520292451.
102. ^ Wood, Philip (2013). The Chronicle of Seert: Christian Historical Imagination in Late Antique Iraq. Oxford University Press. p. 27\. ISBN 9780199670673.
103. ^ Payne 2021, p. 27-28.
104. ^ Jean 2012, p. 167: "The Christians of Mesopotamia, newly converted during the third and fourth centuries are, roughly speaking, the same population as the pagans of the Assyrian and Babylonian empires. They are the heirs of an ancient way of thinking and of local social and cultural systems. They developed a specific approach to their new faith, which could not be completely conflicting with their background."
105. ^ Jean, Cynthia (2011). "L'évangélisation de l'Assyrie par Addaï et Mār Māri. Les figures fondatrices du christianisme oriental des origines" (in French): p. 2.
106. ^ Frahm, Eckart (2023). "Assyria's Legacy on the Ground". Assyria: The Rise and Fall of the World's First Empire. Basic Books. p. 363\. ISBN 9781541674400.
107. ^ a b Arabou, Jessi (2023). "Assyrian Christians, Dr. Aaron M. Butts: A Rebuttal". Assyrian Cultural & Social Youth Association Inc: 5.
108. ^ Marciak, Michał (2017). Sophene, Gordyene, and Adiabene: Three Regna Minora of Northern Mesopotamia Between East and West. Brill Publishers. p. 416\. ISBN 9789004350724.
109. ^ Marciak, Michał (2017). Sophene, Gordyene, and Adiabene: Three Regna Minora of Northern Mesopotamia Between East and West. Brill Publishers. p. 413\. ISBN 9789004350724.
110. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. (2014). "Assyrians, Syrians and the Greek Language in the late Hellenistic and Roman Imperial Periods". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 73 (2): 299–317\. doi:10.1086/677249. JSTOR 10.1086/677249.
111. ^ Payne, Richard E. (2015). A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity. University of California Press. p. 147\. ISBN 9780520292451.
112. ^ Smith, Kyle (13 February 2016). "When Christians Became Iranian". Marginalia.
113. ^ Edward, Ramsin (2024). "Christianising Assyria (II)". Banipal: Issued by General Directorate of Syriac Culture and Arts. 52 (1): 231.
114. ^ Al-Jeloo, Nicholas (2012). "Kaldayutha: The Spar-Sammane and Late Antique Syriac Astrology". ARAM Periodical. 24 (1): 478–479.
115. ^ Marciak, Michał (2017). Sophene, Gordyene, and Adiabene: Three Regna Minora of Northern Mesopotamia Between East and West. Brill Publishers. p. 290\. ISBN 9789004350700.
116. ^ Kalimi & Richardson 2014, p. 451.
117. ^ Payne 2021, p. 29.
118. ^ Jean, Cynthia (2012). "Exorcism and the founding figures of Early Eastern Christianity". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity and Influence. Uppsala Universitet. pp. 164–165\. ISBN 9789155483036.
119. ^ Ponchia & Lanfranchi 2024, p. 528.
120. ^ Wood, Philip (2013). The Chronicle of Seert: Christian Historical Imagination in Late Antique Iraq. Oxford University Press. pp. 235–236\. ISBN 9780199670673.
121. ^ Jenkins, Philip (2009). The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia--And How It Died. HarperOne. p. 14\. ISBN 9780061472817.
122. ^ Younan, Andrew (2021). "Ecumenism, Christology, and Ethnicity: The 26th Letter of Patriarch Timothy of the Church of the East (Translation and Commentary)": pp. 2–3.
123. ^ Minov 2020, p. 192.
124. ^ Minov 2020, pp. 193–194.
125. ^ Wood, Philip (2011). 'We Have No King But Christ': Christian Political Thought in Greater Syria on the Eve of the Arab Conquest. Oxford University Press. pp. 125–126\. ISBN 9780199588497.
126. ^ Wood, Philip (2011). 'We Have No King But Christ': Christian Political Thought in Greater Syria on the Eve of the Arab Conquest. Oxford University Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 9780199588497.
127. ^ a b Minov 2020, p. 194.
128. ^ Segal 1970, p. 1.
129. ^ Kubat, Rodoljub (2014). "Memra of Ephrem the Syrian of Jonah and the Repentance of the Ninevites". Θεολογια. 85 (4): 198.
130. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 45.
131. ^ Hilkens, Andy (2018). The Anonymous Syriac Chronicle of 1234 and Its Sources. Peeters. pp. 206–207\. ISBN 9789042934023.
132. ^ Hilkens, Andy (2018). The Anonymous Syriac Chronicle of 1234 and Its Sources. Peeters. p. 227\. ISBN 9789042934023.
133. ^ Debié, Muriel (2024). Alexandre le Grand en Syriaque: Le maître des lieux, des savoirs et des temps (in French). Belles Lettres. pp. 522–523\. ISBN 9782251454900. "Alors qu'il était associé dans la Bible (Gn 8, 10-12) à la tour de Babel et à la révolte contre Dieu, les lettrés syriaques le dotèrent d'une image positive. Sans plus mentionner le lien avec Babel, ils firent de lui le premier souverain de Babylone et plus largement le premier souverain terrestre, un souverain qui avait reçu la royauté de Dieu qui avait fait de lui un vaillant guerrier. Comme vu plus haut, selon Aphraate, la première bête que vit Daniel était les descendants de Nemrod, les fils de Cham, c'est-à-dire les Babyloniens. Les noms des cités qu'il aurait fondées selon la Genèse ont été mis à jour et adaptés au contexte de l'Antiquité tardive et remplacés par des noms locaux et familiers de cités de Mésopotamie du Nord et du Sud. Il était devenu dans la tradition syriaque un héros fondateur, acculturé du texte biblique pour constituer une mémoire du passé local mésopotamien."
134. ^ Tomass, Mark (2012). "Multiple Resource-Sharing Groups as Basis for Identity Conflict". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 243\. ISBN 9789155483036.
135. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 44.
136. ^ a b c Fathi, Jean (2016). "Yūḥannā ibn al-Ġurayr, passeur de la tradition syriaque et arabe chrétienne au XVIIe siècle". Journal of Eastern Christian Studies (in French). 68 (1): 158.
137. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 42–43.
138. ^ Pohl, Walter (2021). "Mapping Historiography: An Essay in Comparison". In Pohl, Walter; Mahoney, Daniel (eds.). Historiography and Identity IV: Writing History Across Medieval Eurasia. Brepols Publishers. p. 328\. ISBN 9782503586588.
139. ^ Wood, Philip (2021). "Conceptions of Suryaya Identity in the Sixth to Ninth Centuries". The Imam of the Christians: The World of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre, c. 750–850. Princeton University Press. p. 232\. ISBN 9780691212791.
140. ^ Debié, Muriel (2009). "Syriac Historiography and Identity Formation" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 104. doi:10.1163/187124109X408014.
141. ^ Wood, Philip (2021). "Conceptions of Suryaya Identity in the Sixth to Ninth Centuries". The Imam of the Christians: The World of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre, c. 750–850. Princeton University Press. p. 209\. ISBN 9780691212791.
142. ^ Wood, Philip (2021). "Conceptions of Suryaya Identity in the Sixth to Ninth Centuries". The Imam of the Christians: The World of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre, c. 750–850. Princeton University Press. p. 234\. ISBN 9780691212791.
143. ^ Debié, Muriel (2009). "Syriac Historiography and Identity Formation" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 97.
144. ^ Wood, Philip (2021). "Conceptions of Suryaya Identity in the Sixth to Ninth Centuries". The Imam of the Christians: The World of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre, c. 750–850. Princeton University Press. p. 225\. ISBN 978-0-691-21279-1
145. ^ Weltecke, Dorothea (2009). "Michael the Syrian and Syriac Orthodox Identity" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 120. doi:10.1163/187124109X408023.
146. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter (2009). Religious Origins of Nations? The Christian Communities of the Middle East. Brill Publishers. p. 329\. ISBN 9789004173750.
147. ^ a b c Kellogg, Sarah Bakker (2019). "Perforating Kinship: Syriac Christianity, Ethnicity, and Secular Legibility". Current Anthropology. 60 (4): 479.
148. ^ Andrade, Nathanael J. (2018). "Syriac and Syrians in the Later Roman Empire". The Syriac World. Routledge. p. 167\. ISBN 9781317482116.
149. ^ Donabed & Mako 2009, p. 90.
150. ^ Hilkens, Andy (2020). "Language, Literacy and Historical Apologetics: Hippolytus of Rome's lists of literate peoples in the Syriac tradition". Journal of Eastern Christian Studies. 72 (1): 29.
151. ^ Hilkens, Andy (2018). The Anonymous Syriac Chronicle of 1234 and Its Sources. Peeters. p. 111\. ISBN 9789042934023.
152. ^ Fathi, Jean (2016). "Yūḥannā ibn al-Ġurayr, passeur de la tradition syriaque et arabe chrétienne au XVIIe siècle". Journal of Eastern Christian Studies (in French). 68 (1): 151.
153. ^ Becker 2008, p. 8.
154. ^ Edward, Ramsin (2024). "Christianising Assyria (II)". Banipal: Issued by General Directorate of Syriac Culture and Arts. 52 (1): 231-232
155. ^ Yana, George V. (2008). Ancient and Modern Assyrians: A Scientific Analysis. Xlibris Corporation. pp. 75–76\. ISBN 9781465316295.
156. ^ Debié, Muriel (2024). Alexandre le Grand en syriaque: Le maître des lieux, des savoirs et des temps (in French). Belles Lettres. pp. 309–310\. ISBN 9782251454900.
157. ^ Weltecke, Dorothea (2016). "Bar ʻEbroyo: Remarks on his Historical Writing" (PDF). Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies. 19 (1): 311.
158. ^ Weltecke, Dorothea (2016). "Bar ʻEbroyo: Remarks on his Historical Writing" (PDF). Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies. 19 (1): 323-324.
159. ^ Wood, Philip (2021). "Conceptions of Suryaya Identity in the Sixth to Ninth Centuries". The Imam of the Christians: The World of Dionysius of Tel-Mahre. Princeton University Press. pp. 229–230\. ISBN 9780691212791.
160. ^ Edward, Ramsin (2024). "Christianising Assyria (II)". Banipal: Issued by General Directorate of Syriac Culture and Arts. 52 (1): 229.
161. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 28.
162. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 26-27.
163. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 26-27.
164. ^ Haar Romeny, Bas ter; Atto, Naures; van Ginkel, Jan J.; Immerzeel, Mat; Snelders, Bas (2009). "The Formation of a Communal Identity among West Syrian Christians: Results and Conclusions of the Leiden Project" (PDF). Church History and Religious Culture. 89 (1): 27-28.
165. ^ a b van Ginkel, Jan J. (2008). "Aramaic Brothers or Heretics: The image of the East Syrians in the Chronography of Michael the Great (d. 1199)". The Harp. 23: 366.
166. ^ a b c d e f Butts 2017, p. 602.
167. ^ Becker 2015, p. 328.
168. ^ Murre-van den Berg, H.L. (1998). "A Syrian Awakening. Alqosh and Urmia as Centres of Neo-Syriac Writing" (PDF). Symposium Syriacum. VII: 502–503.
169. ^ Cameron 2009, p. 7.
170. ^ Efstathiadou 2011, p. 191.
171. ^ Morrison 2018, p. 39.
172. ^ Parpola 2004, p. 11.
173. ^ Butts 2017, p. 604.
174. ^ a b c d e Butts 2017, p. 599.
175. ^ Lundgren 2023, p. 5.
176. ^ Donabed & Mako 2009, p. 80-81.
177. ^ Gaunt, Atto & Barthoma 2017, p. ix.
178. ^ Salem 2020.
179. ^ Trolle Larsen 2017, p. 584.
180. ^ Parpola 2004, p. 21.
181. ^ a b c Malko, Helen (2019). "Heritage Wars: A Cultural Genocide in Iraq". In Bachman, Jeffrey (ed.). Cultural Genocide: Law, Politics, and Global Manifestations. Routledge. p. 216\. ISBN 9781351214087.
182. ^ a b c Piroyan, William; Naby, Eden (1999). "FESTIVALS ix. Assyrian". In Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. IX/6: Festivals VIII–Fish (Online ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. pp. 561–563.
183. ^ a b c Luukko & Van Buylaere 2017, p. 318.
184. ^ Radner 2021, p. 147.
185. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 180.
186. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 190.
187. ^ Luukko & Van Buylaere 2017, p. 314.
188. ^ Abraham & Sokoloff 2011, pp. 22, 59.
189. ^ Kaufman 1974, p. 164.
190. ^ Abraham & Sokoloff 2011, p. 59.
191. ^ Frahm 2023, p. 361.
192. ^ Gai, Amikam (2016). "Modern Syriac and Akkadian – Each Language in the Looking-Glass of the Other". Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 106 (1): 51–59\. JSTOR 26449340.
193. ^ Parpola 2004, p. 5–22.
194. ^ Biggs 2005, p. 10: "Especially in view of the very early establishment of Christianity in Assyria and its continuity to the present and the continuity of the population, I think there is every likelihood that ancient Assyrians are among the ancestors of modern Assyrians of the area".
195. ^ Saggs 1984, p. 290: "The destruction of the Assyrian Empire did not wipe out its population. They were predominantly peasant farmers, and since Assyria contains some of the best wheat land in the Near East, descendants of the Assyrian peasants would, as opportunity permitted, build new villages over the old cities and carried on with agricultural life, remembering traditions of the former cities. After seven or eight centuries and after various vicissitudes, these people became Christians. These Christians, and the Jewish communities scattered amongst them, not only kept alive the memory of their Assyrian predecessors but also combined them with traditions from the Bible".
196. ^ Roux 1992, pp. 276–277, 419–420.
197. ^ Assyrian Academic Society: Summary of the Lecture "There is no reason to believe that there would be no racial or cultural continuity in Assyria since there is no evidence that the population of Assyria was removed".
198. ^ a b Novák, Mirko; Younansardaroud, Helen (2002). "Mār Behnām, Sohn des Sanherib von Nimrūd". Altorientalische Forschungen (in German). 29 (1): 166–167\. doi:10.1524/aofo.2002.29.1.166.
199. ^ Barryakoub, Afram (2007). "Nytt fynd stärker samband mellan suroye-asuroye". Huyada (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 13 February 2022. "I completely agree that these names mean Assyrians. From an etymological point of view, that is where the word comes from, I am very sure. It is a distortion of the word Assyrian."
200. ^ Rollinger, Robert (2012). "The Terms "Assyria" and "Syria" Again". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. pp. 47–52\. ISBN 9789155483036.
201. ^ Frye 1999, pp. 69–70.
202. ^ Hitti 1951, p. 519.
203. ^ a b Crone & Cook 1977, p. 55.
204. ^ Nisan 2002, p. 181.
205. ^ Makko 2012, p. 297-317.
206. ^ Cetrez, Onver. A (2012). "Assyrian Identification as a Body of Power Politics: A Practice-Oriented Analysis". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 221\. ISBN 9789155483036.
207. ^ Donef, Racho (2012). Assyrians Post-Nineveh: Identity, Fragmentation, Conflict and Survival. Tatavla Publishing. ISBN 9780987423900.
208. ^ Khan, Geoffrey (2012). "The Language of the Modern Assyrians: The North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialect group". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity and Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 178\. ISBN 9789155483036.
209. ^ Jean 2012, p. 167: "The Christians of Mesopotamia, newly converted during the third and fourth centuries are, roughly speaking, the same population as the pagans of the Assyrian and Babylonian empires. They are the heirs of an ancient way of thinking and of local social and cultural systems. They developed a specific approach to their new faith, which could not be completely conflicting with their background."
210. ^ Annus, Amar (2002). "Continuity of Mesopotamian Traditions in Late Antiquity". The God Ninurta: In the Mythology and Royal Ideology of Ancient Mesopotamia. Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project. pp. 187–202\. ISBN 9789514590573.
211. ^ Boháč, Artur (2010). "Assyrian Ethnic Identity in a Globalizing World". Beyond Globalisation: Exploring the Limits of Globalisation in the Regional Context. University of Ostrava. p. 69\. ISBN 9788073687175.
212. ^ Barryakoub, Afram (2010). "Nytt ljus över assyrisk kontinuitet". Huyada (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 21 May 2024. "When one of the audience members asked MacGinnis what he thought about the persistent myth of the extinction of Assyrian identity after the fall of Nineveh, his response began with: 'This is of course ridiculous…'"
213. ^ MacGinnis, John (2012). "Population and Identity in the Assyrian empire: A Case Study". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. pp. 148–149\. ISBN 9789155483036.
214. ^ Mark 2018, "there are still Assyrians living in the regions of Iran and northern Iraq, and elsewhere, in the present day".
215. ^ Segal 1970, pp. 47, 51, 68–70.
216. ^ Jupp 2001, p. 174: "The Assyrians are the descendants of the once mighty Assyrian nation which inhabited the northern part of the country known as Iraq", "The Assyrians, who were Christians, managed to survive in the lands of their forefathers until the outbreak of the First World War".
217. ^ Travis 2010, pp. 148–151.
218. ^ Travis 2010, p. 148: "Although some authors doubt that Assyrian people could have survived from 600 BCE to the nineteenth century, many of the factors that justify recognizing Armenians, Jews, or other groups as continuously existing since ancient times also apply to the Assyrians, namely common patterns of worship, consistent self-identification, and genetic continuity".
219. ^ Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994, p. 218: "They are Christian and are possibly bona fide descendants of their ancient namesakes".
220. ^ Akbari et al. 1986, p. 85: "The Assyrians are a group of Christians, also known as Nestorians, with a long history in the Middle East. From historical and archaeological evidence, it is thought that their ancestors formed part of the Mesopotamian civilization".
221. ^ a b Yildiz 1999, p. 16-19.
222. ^ a b Donabed 2019, p. 118.
223. ^ a b c Gewargis 2002, p. 89.
224. ^ Odisho, Edward Y. (1988). The Sound System of Modern Assyrian (Neo-Aramaic). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 3–18\. ISBN 9783447027441.
225. ^ Odisho, Edward Y. (2009). Linguistic and Cultural Studies in Aramaic and Arabic. Gorgias Press. p. 3\. ISBN 9781607245865.
226. ^ Donabed, Sargon; Mako, Shamiran (2012). "Between Denial and Existence: Situating Assyrians within the Discourse on Cultural Genocide". Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 284\. ISBN 9789155483036.
227. ^ Deniz, Fuat (1999). Upprätthållande och transformation av etnisk identitet i förhållande till moderniseringsprocesser: det assyriska exemplet [Maintenance and Transformation of Ethnic Identity: the Assyrian case]. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 9162837591.
228. ^ Harrak, Amir (10 July 2019). "Assyrians Of The 12th Century AD by Professor Amir Harrak". Assyria TV.
229. ^ Aboona, Hirmis (2008). Assyrians, Kurds, and Ottomans: Intercommunal Relations on the Periphery of the Ottoman Empire. Cambria Press. pp. 30, 107. ISBN 9781604975833.
230. ^ Al-Jeloo, Nicholas (26 September 2016). Assyrian Continuity Post-Empire: The Relevance of Preserving Assyrian History and Heritage – via YouTube.
231. ^ Barryakoub, Afram (2007). "Nytt fynd stärker samband mellan suroye-asuroye". Huyada (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 13 February 2022. "What I want to emphasize strongly here is that our Assyrian ancestors definitely did not receive the concept of Suraye or Suroye from a foreign people or language, to name for example the Luwian language, and suddenly began to call themselves Suraye or Suroye instead of Ashuraye (Assyrians). The origin of this pronunciation change, that Ashuraye became Suraye and Suroye, is proven in the Aramaic language that Assyrian kings, voluntarily and for strategic purposes, received and elevated to an official language in the Assyrian empire since the 9th century BC, side by side with their own and much older language which they themselves called Ashuritu or Akadattu, that is, the Assyrian or Akkadian language."
232. ^ Wilmshurst 2011, pp. 413–416.
233. ^ Becker 2008, p. 396.
234. ^ Travis, Hannibal (2012). "On the Existence of National Identity Before 'Imagined Communities': The Example of the Assyrians of Mesopotamia, Anatolia and Persia". In Donabed, Sargon; Makko, Aryo; Cetrez, Onver A. (eds.). Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity And Influence. Uppsala Universitet. p. 118\. ISBN 9789155483036.
235. ^ Holloway 2003, p. 71.
236. ^ Payne 2012, p. 215.
237. ^ Wilmshurst 2011, p. 415.
238. ^ Jackson 2020, Chapter 1.
239. ^ Donabed 2012, p. 412.
240. ^ Naby 2006, pp. 527–528.
241. ^ Travis 2010, p. 149.
242. ^ Banoei et al. 2008, p. 79.
243. ^ Dogan, Serkan; Gurkan, Cemal; Dogan, Mustafa; Balkaya, Hasan Emin; Tunc, Ramazan; Demirdov, Damla Kanliada; Ameen, Nihad Ahmed; Marjanovic, Damir (2017). "A glimpse at the intricate mosaic of ethnicities from Mesopotamia: Paternal lineages of the Northern Iraqi Arabs, Kurds, Syriacs, Turkmens and Yazidis". PLOS ONE. 12 (11): e0187408. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1287408D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187408. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5669434. PMID 29099847.

### Bibliography

[edit]

* Abraham, Kathleen; Sokoloff, Michael (2011). "Aramaic Loanwords in Akkadian – A Reassessment of the Proposals". Archiv für Orientforschung. 52: 22–76\. JSTOR 24595102.
* Akbari, Mohammad Taghi; Papiha, Sunder S.; Roberts, Derek Frank; Farhud, Dariush (1986). "Genetic differentiation among Iranian Christian communities". American Journal of Human Genetics. 38 (1): 84–98\. PMC 1684716. PMID 3456196.
* Bahrani, Zainab (2006). "Race and Ethnicity in Mesopotamian Antiquity". World Archaeology. 38 (1): 48–59\. doi:10.1080/00438240500509843. JSTOR 40023594. S2CID 144093611.
* Banoei, Mohammad Mehdi; Chaleshtori, Morteza Hashemzadeh; Sanati, Mohammad Hossein; Shariati, Parvin; Houshmand, Massoud; Majidizadeh, Tayebeh; Soltani, Niloofar Jahangir; Golalipour, Massoud (2008). "Variation ofDAT1 VNTR Alleles and Genotypes Among Old Ethnic Groups in Mesopotamia to the Oxus Region". Human Biology. 80 (1): 73–81\. doi:10.3378/1534-6617(2008)80[73:VODVAA]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 41465951. PMID 18505046. S2CID 10417591.
* Becker, Adam H. (2008). "The Ancient Near East in the Late Antique Near East: Syriac Christian Appropriation of the Biblical East". Antiquity in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Pasts in the Greco-Roman World. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. pp. 394–415\. ISBN 9783161494116.
* Becker, Adam H. (2015). Revival and Awakening: American Evangelical Missionaries in Iran and the Origins of Assyrian Nationalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226145280.
* Benjamen, Alda (2022). Assyrians in Modern Iraq: Negotiating Political and Cultural Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108838795.
* Biggs, Robert D. (2005). "My Career in Assyriology and Near Eastern Archaeology" (PDF). Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 19 (1): 1–23\. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2008.
* Butts, Aaron Michael (2017). "Assyrian Christians". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Cameron, Averil (2009). The Byzantines. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-9833-2.
* Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca; Menozzi, Paolo & Piazza, Alberto (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08750-4.
* Crone, Patricia; Cook, Michael A. (1977). Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521211338.
* Dalley, Stephanie (1993). "Nineveh after 612 BC". Altorientalische Forschungen. 20 (1): 134–147\. doi:10.1524/aofo.1993.20.1.134. S2CID 163383142.
* Donabed, Sargon (2012). "Rethinking Nationalism and an Appellative Conundrum: Historiography and Politics in Iraq". National Identities. 14 (4): 407–431\. Bibcode:2012NatId..14..407D. doi:10.1080/14608944.2012.733208. S2CID 145265726.
* Donabed, Sargon (2019). "Persistent Perseverance: A Trajectory of Assyrian History in the Modern Age". In Rowe, Paul S. (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Minorities in the Middle East. London. ISBN 978-1138649040.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
* Donabed, Sargon; Mako, Shamiran (2009). "Ethno-cultural and Religious Identity of Syrian Orthodox Christians". Revue d'Histoire de l'Université de Balamand: 71–113\. ISSN 1608-7526.
* Düring, Bleda S. (2020). The Imperialisation of Assyria: An Archaeological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108478748.
* Efstathiadou, Anna (2011). "Representing Greekness: French and Greek Lithographs from the Greek War of Independence (1821–1827) and the Greek-Italian War (1940–1941)" (PDF). Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 29 (2): 191–218\. doi:10.1353/mgs.2011.0023. S2CID 144506772.
* Frahm, Eckart (2017). "Introduction". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Frahm, Eckart (2017). "The Neo-Assyrian Period (ca. 1000–609 BCE)". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Frahm, Eckart (2017). "Assyria in the Hebrew Bible". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Frye, Richard N. (1999). "Reply to John Joseph" (PDF). Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 13 (1): 69–70\. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2020.
* Gaunt, David; Atto, Naures; Barthoma, Soner O. (2017). Let Them Not Return: Sayfo – The Genocide Against the Assyrian, Syriac, and Chaldean Christians in the Ottoman Empire. New York: Berghahn. ISBN 978-1785334986.
* Gewargis, Odisho Malko (2002). "We Are Assyrians" (PDF). Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 16 (1): 77–95\. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 April 2003.
* Haider, Peter W. (2008). "Tradition and change in the beliefs at Assur, Nineveh and Nisibis between 300 BC and AD 300". In Kaizer, Ted (ed.). The Variety of Local Religious Life in the Near East: In the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 978-9004167353.
* Harper, Prudence O.; Klengel-Brandt, Evelyn; Aruz, Joan; Benzel, Kim (1995). Assyrian Origins: Discoveries at Ashur on the Tigris: Antiquities in the Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 0-87099-743-2.
* Hauser, Stefan R. (2017). "Post-Imperial Assyria". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Holloway, Steven W. (2003). "The Quest for Sargon, Pul and Tiglath-Pileser in the Nineteenth Century". In Chavalas, Mark W.; Younger, Jr, K. Lawson (eds.). Mesopotamia and the Bible. Edinburgh: A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-84127-252-8.
* Hitti, Philip K. (1951). History of Syria: Including Lebanon and Palestine. London: MacMillan. OCLC 5510718.
* Jackson, Cailah (2020). Islamic Manuscripts of Late Medieval Rum, 1270s-1370s: Production, Patronage and the Arts of the Book. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-1474451505.
* Jupp, James (2001). Australian People: An Encyclopedia of the Nation, its People and their Origins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-80789-1.
* Kalimi, Isaac; Richardson, Seth (2014). "Sennacherib at the Gates of Jerusalem: Story, History and Historiography: An Introduction". In Kalimi, Isaac; Richardson, Seth (eds.). Sennacherib at the Gates of Jerusalem: Story, History and Historiography. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-9004265615.
* Kaufman, Stephen A. (1974). The Akkadian Influences on Aramaic. The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Assyriological Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-62281-9.
* Kuhrt, Amélie (1995). "The Assyrian heartland in the Achaemenid period". Pallas. Revue d'études antiques. 43 (43): 239–254\. JSTOR 43660582.
* Livingstone, Alasdair (2009). "Remembrance at Assur: The Case of the dated Aramaic memorials". Studia Orientalia Electronica. 106: 151–157.
* Lundgren, Svante (2023). "When the Assyrian Tragedy Became Seyfo: A Study of Swedish-Assyrian Politics of Memory". Genocide Studies International. 14 (2): 95–108\. doi:10.3138/GSI-2022-0002. S2CID 257178308.
* Luukko, Mikko; Van Buylaere, Greta (2017). "Languages and Writing Systems in Assyria". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Makko, Aryo (2012). "Discourse, Identity and Politics: A Transnational Approach to Assyrian Identity in the Twentieth Century". The Assyrian Heritage: threads of continuity and influence. Uppsala. ISSN 1654-630X.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
* Mark, Joshua J. (2018). "Assyria". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
* Michel, Cécile (2017). "Economy, Society, and Daily Life in the Old Assyrian Period". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Minov, Sergey (2020). Memory and Identity in the Syriac Cave of Treasures: Rewriting the Bible in Sasanian Iran. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 978-9004445505.
* Morrison, Susannah (2018). ""A Kindred Sigh for Thee": British Responses to the Greek War for Independence". The Thetean: A Student Journal for Scholarly Historical Writing. 47 (1): 37–55.
* Naby, Eden (2006). "Assyrian Nationalism in Iraq: Survival under Religious and Ethnic Threat". In Burszta, Wojciech J.; Kamusella, Tomasz & Wojchiechowski, Sebastian (eds.). Nationalisms Across the Globe: An Overview of Nationalisms in State-Endowed and Statless Nations, Volume II: the World. Bygoszcz: School of Humanities and Journalism. ISBN 83-87653-46-2.
* Nisan, Mordechai (2002). Minorities in the Middle East: A History of Struggle and Self-Expression (2nd ed.). Jefferson: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-1375-1.
* Novák, Mirko (2016). "Assyrians and Arameans: Modes of Cohabitation and Acculuration at Guzana (Tell Halaf)". In Aruz, Joan; Seymour, Michael (eds.). Assyria to Iberia: Art and Culture in the Iron Age. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 978-1588396068.
* Parpola, Simo (1999). "Assyrians after Assyria". Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 13 (2).
* Parpola, Simo (2004). "National and Ethnic Identity in the Neo-Assyrian Empire and Assyrian Identity in Post-Empire Times" (PDF). Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 18 (2): 5–22.
* Payne, Richard (2012). "Avoiding Ethnicity: Uses of the Ancient Past in Late Sasanian Northern Mesopotamia". In Pohl, Walter; Gantner, Clemens; Payne, Richard (eds.). Visions of Community in the Post-Roman World: The West, Byzantium and the Islamic World, 300–1100. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-1409427094.
* Petrosian, Vahram (2006). "Assyrians in Iraq". Iran and the Caucasus. 10 (1): 138. doi:10.1163/157338406777979322. S2CID 154905506.
* Radner, Karen (2015). Ancient Assyria: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198715900.
* Radner, Karen (2021). "Diglossia and the Neo-Assyrian Empire's Akkadian and Aramaic Text Production". In Jonker, Louis C.; Berlejung, Angelika & Cornelius, Izak (eds.). Multilingualism in Ancient Contexts: Perspectives from Ancient Near Eastern and Early Christian Contexts. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media. ISBN 978-1991201164.
* Reade, Julian E. (1998). "Greco-Parthian Nineveh". Iraq. 60: 65–83\. doi:10.2307/4200453. JSTOR 4200453. S2CID 191474172.
* Reade, Julian Edgeworth (2018). "Nineveh Rediscovered". In Brereton, Gareth (ed.). I am Ashurbanipal, king of the World, king of Assyria. London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-48039-7.
* Rollinger, Robert (2006). "The Terms "Assyria" and "Syria" Again". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 65 (4): 283–287\. doi:10.1086/511103. JSTOR 10.1086/511103. S2CID 162760021.
* Roux, Georges (1992). Ancient Iraq. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0140125238.
* Saggs, Henry W. F. (1984). The Might That Was Assyria. London: Sidgwick & Jackson. ISBN 9780312035112.
* Salem, Chris (24 December 2020). "A Name Chaldeans Forgot: Assyria". Medium. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
* Segal, Judah B. (1970). Edessa: The Blessed City. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-821545-5.
* Shehadeh, Lamia Rustum (2011). "The name of Syria in ancient and modern usage". In Beshara, Adel (ed.). The Origins of Syrian Nationhood: Histories, pioneers and identity. Oxford: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-61504-4.
* Smith, Sidney (1926). "Notes on "The Assyrian Tree"". Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London. 4 (1): 69–76\. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00102599. JSTOR 607403. S2CID 178173677.
* Tamari, Steve (2019). "The Land of Syria in the Late Seventeenth Century: ʿAbd al-Ghani al-Nabulusi and Linking City and Countryside through Study, Travel, and Worship". In Tamari, Steve (ed.). Grounded Identities: Territory and Belonging in the Medieval and Early Modern Middle East and Mediterranean. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 978-9004385337.
* Travis, Hannibal (2010). Genocide in the Middle East: The Ottoman Empire, Iraq, and Sudan. Durham: Carolina Academic Press. ISBN 978-1594604362.
* Trolle Larsen, Mogens (2017). "The Archaeological Exploration of Assyria". In E. Frahm (ed.). A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118325247.
* Valk, Jonathan (1 November 2020). "Crime and Punishment: Deportation in the Levant in the Age of Assyrian Hegemony". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 384: 77–103\. doi:10.1086/710485. S2CID 225379553.
* Wilmshurst, David (2011). The martyred Church: A History of the Church of the East. London: East & West Publishing Limited. ISBN 9781907318047.
* Yildiz, Efrem (1999). "The Assyrians: A Historical and Current Reality". Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 13 (1): 15–30.

## Further reading

[edit]

* Bedford, Peter R. (2009). "The Neo-Assyrian Empire". In Morris, Ian; Scheidel, Walter (eds.). The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537158-1.
* Deutscher, G. (2009). "Akkadian". Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World. Oxford: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-087774-7.
* Filoni, Fernando (2017). The Church in Iraq. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 978-0813229652.

* v
* t
* e

Assyrian people

Ethno-linguistic group(s) indigenous to the Middle East; also known as Syriac-Arameans or Chaldeans

Identity|

* Assyrian continuity
* Terms for Syriac Christians

Assyrian flag

Aramean-Syriac flag

Chaldean flag

Syriac
Christianity|

| West Syriac Rite|

* Syriac Orthodox Church (518–)
* Syriac Catholic Church (1662–)
* Assyrian Evangelical Church (1870–)
* Assyrian Pentecostal Church (1940–)

|

East Syriac Rite|

* Chaldean Catholic Church (1552–)
* Assyrian Church of the East (1692–)
* Ancient Church of the East (1968–)

Neo-Aramaic
dialects|

* Sureth
* Surayt
* Bohtan
* Hertevin
* Senaya
* Barwar
* Koy Sanjaq
* Bakhdida
* Urmia
* Mlaḥsô
* Syriac script

Culture|

* Assyrian folk-pop music
* Music of Mesopotamia
* Syriac sacral music
* Folk dance
* Cuisine
* Weddings

History
(including
related
contexts)|

| Ancient Assyria|

* Early Assyrian period (2600–2025 BCE)
* Old Assyrian period (2025–1364 BCE)
* Middle Assyrian Empire (1363–912 BCE)
* Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–609 BCE)
* Post-imperial Assyria (609 BCE–240 CE)
* Ancient Mesopotamian religion
* Arameans
* Assyrian tribes

|

Classical
antiquity|

* Seleucid Empire (312–63 BCE)
* Parthian Empire (247 BCE–224 CE)
* Osroene (132 BCE–244 CE)
* Syrian Wars (66 BCE–217 CE)
* Roman Syria (64 BCE–637 CE)
* Adiabene (15–116)
* Roman Assyria (116–118)
* Christianization (1st to 3rd c.)
* Nestorian schism (5th c.)
* Church of the East (410-1552)
* Asoristan (226–651)
* Byzantine–Sasanian Wars (502–628)

Middle ages|

* Muslim conquest of Mesopotamia (630s)
* Muslim conquest of Syria (630s)
* Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258)
* Emirs of Mosul (905–1383)
* Buyid amirate (945–1055)
* Principality of Antioch (1098–1268)
* Ilkhanate (1258–1335)
* Jalayirid Sultanate (1335–1432)
* Qara Qoyunlu (1375–1468)
* Aq Qoyunlu (1453–1501)

Modern era|

* Safavid Empire (1508–55)
* Ottoman Empire (1555–1917)
* Schism of 1552 (16th c.)
* Massacres of Badr Khan (1840s)
* Massacres of Diyarbekir (1895)
* Rise of nationalism (19th c.)
* Adana massacre (1909)
* Assyrian genocide (1914–20)
* Independence movement (1919–)
* Simele massacre (1933)
* Post-Saddam Iraq (2003–)
* Genocide of Christians by ISIL (2014–)
* Qaraqosh wedding fire (2023)

By country|

| Homeland
Settlements|

* Iraq
* Nineveh Plains
* Qaraqosh
* Alqosh
* Tel Keppe
* Bartella
* Ankawa
* Shaqlawa
* Zakho
* Iran
* Urmia
* Salmas
* Sanandaj
* Syria
* Al-Hasakah Governorate
* Al-Hasakah
* Tell Tamer
* Qamishli
* Khabur
* Turkey
* Hakkari
* Diyarbakır
* Elazığ
* Mardin Province
* Mardin
* Mazıdağı
* Tur Abdin

|

Diaspora|

* Armenia
* Azerbaijan
* Australia
* Belgium
* Canada
* Finland
* France
* Georgia
* Germany
* Greece
* Israel
* Jordan
* Lebanon
* Mexico
* Netherlands
* New Zealand
* Palestine
* Russia
* Sweden
* United Kingdom
* United States
* Detroit

Politics|

* Assyrian Democratic Movement
* Athra Alliance
* Assyrian Democratic Organization
* Assyrian Universal Alliance
* Christian Alliance (Iraq)
* Dawronoye
* Syriac Union Party (Syria)
* Syriac Union Party (Lebanon)
* Syriac Military Council
* Sutoro
* World Council of Arameans

* History portal
* Christianity portal

*[r.]: reigned
*[c.]: circa
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template