Authoritarianism

Political system characterized by the rejection of political pluralism

This article is about authoritarianism in political science and organizational studies. For authoritarianism in psychology, see Authoritarian personality. For a form of government where power is held by a single individual, see Autocracy.

Part of the Politics series

Basic forms of government
List of forms · List of countries

Source of power

|  Democracy (rule by many)

* Demarchy
* Direct
* Economic
* Liberal
* Representative
* Social
* Socialist
* Others

* * *

Oligarchy (rule by few)

* Anocracy
* Aristocracy
* Broligarchy
* Gerontocracy
* Kleptocracy
* Kritarchy
* Meritocracy
* Noocracy
* Particracy
* Plutocracy
* Stratocracy
* Technocracy
* Theocracy

* * *

Autocracy (rule by one)

* Despotism
* Dictatorship
* Military dictatorship
* Tyranny

* * *

Anarchy (rule by none)

* Anarchism
* Free association
* Stateless

* * *

Power ideology

* Monarchy
* Republic

(socio-political ideologies)

* Absolute
* Communist
* Constitutional
* Directorial
* Legalist
* Parliamentary
* Presidential
* Semi-presidential

* * *

* Authoritarian
* Libertarian

(socio-economic ideologies)

* Anarchism
* Colonialism
* Communism
* Despotism
* Distributism
* Fascism
* Feudalism
* Islamism
* Socialism
* Totalitarianism
* Tribalism

* * *

* Religious
* Secular

* State religion
* Secular state
* Separation of church and state
* State atheism

* * *

* Global
* Local

(geo-cultural ideologies)

* City-state
* Intergovernmental organisation
* National government
* World government
* Nationalism
* Internationalism
* Globalism

Power structure

|  Unitarism

* Unitary state
* Empire
* Principality

* * *

Client state

* Associated state
* Dependent territory
* Dominion
* Protectorate
* Puppet state
* Puppet monarch
* Satellite state
* Self-governing colony
* Tributary state
* Buffer state
* Vassal state
* Viceroyalty

* * *

Federalism

* Confederation
* Devolution
* Federation
* Superstate
* Supranational union

* * *

International relations

* Small power
* Middle power
* Regional power
* Emerging power
* Great power
* Superpower

* * *

Related

* Administrative division
* Democracy indices
* Democratic transition
* Autocratization
* Democratisation
* Hybrid regimes

Politics portal

* v
* t
* e

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in democracy, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the rule of law.[1][2] Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military.[3][4] States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.[5][6][7]

The political scientist Juan Linz, in an influential[8] 1964 work, An Authoritarian Regime: Spain, defined authoritarianism as possessing four qualities:

1. Limited political pluralism, which is achieved with constraints on the legislature, political parties and interest groups.
2. Political legitimacy based on appeals to emotion and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat "easily recognizable societal problems, such as underdevelopment or insurgency."
3. Minimal political mobilization, and suppression of anti-regime activities.
4. Ill-defined executive powers, often vague and shifting, used to extend the power of the executive.[9][10]

Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.[11][12][13][14] Broadly defined, authoritarian states include countries that lack human rights such as freedom of religion, or countries in which the government and the opposition do not alternate in power at least once following free elections.[15] Authoritarian states might contain nominally democratic institutions such as political parties, legislatures and elections which are managed to entrench authoritarian rule and can feature fraudulent, non-competitive elections.[16]

Since 1946, the share of authoritarian states in the international political system increased until the mid-1970s but declined from then until the year 2000.[17] Prior to 2000, dictatorships typically began with a coup and replaced a pre-existing authoritarian regime.[18] Since 2000, dictatorships are most likely to begin through democratic backsliding whereby a democratically elected leader established an authoritarian regime.[18]

## Characteristics

[edit]

Authoritarianism is characterized by highly concentrated and centralized government power maintained by political repression and the exclusion of potential or supposed challengers by armed force. It uses political parties and mass organizations to mobilize people around the goals of the regime.[19] Adam Przeworski has theorized that "authoritarian equilibrium rests mainly on lies, fear and economic prosperity."[20]

Authoritarianism also tends to embrace the informal and unregulated exercise of political power, a leadership that is "self-appointed and even if elected cannot be displaced by citizens' free choice among competitors", the arbitrary deprivation of civil liberties and little tolerance for meaningful opposition.[19] A range of social controls also attempt to stifle civil society while political stability is maintained by control over and support of the armed forces, a bureaucracy staffed by the regime and creation of allegiance through various means of socialization and indoctrination.[19] Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart identify authoritarianism in politicians and political parties by looking for values of security, conformity, and obedience.[21]

Authoritarianism is marked by "indefinite political tenure" of the ruler or ruling party (often in a one-party state) or other authority.[19] The transition from an authoritarian system to a more democratic form of government is referred to as democratization.[19]

### Constitutions in authoritarian regimes

[edit]

Authoritarian regimes often adopt "the institutional trappings" of democracies such as constitutions.[22] Constitutions in authoritarian states may serve a variety of roles, including "operating manual" (describing how the government is to function); "billboard" (signal of regime's intent), "blueprint" (outline of future regime plans), and "window dressing" (material designed to obfuscate, such as provisions setting forth freedoms that are not honored in practice).[23] Authoritarian constitutions may help legitimize, strengthen, and consolidate regimes.[24] An authoritarian constitution "that successfully coordinates government action and defines popular expectations can also help consolidate the regime's grip on power by inhibiting re coordination on a different set of arrangements."[25] Unlike democratic constitutions, authoritarian constitutions do not set direct limits on executive authority; however, in some cases such documents may function as ways for elites to protect their own property rights or constrain autocrats' behavior.[26]

The Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918, the first charter of the new Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic (RSFSR), was described by Vladimir Lenin as a "revolutionary" document. It was, he said, unlike any constitution drafted by a nation-state.[27] The concept of "authoritarian constitutionalism" has been developed by legal scholar Mark Tushnet.[28] Tushnet distinguishes authoritarian constitutionalist regimes from "liberal constitutionalist" regimes ("the sort familiar in the modern West, with core commitments to human rights and self-governance implemented by means of varying institutional devices") and from purely authoritarian regimes (which reject the idea of human rights or constraints on leaders' power).[28] He describes authoritarian constitutionalist regimes as (1) authoritarian dominant-party states that (2) impose sanctions (such as libel judgments) against, but do not arbitrarily arrest, political dissidents; (3) permit "reasonably open discussion and criticism of its policies"; (4) hold "reasonably free and fair elections", without systemic intimidation, but "with close attention to such matters as the drawing of election districts and the creation of party lists to ensure as best it can that it will prevail – and by a substantial margin"; (5) reflect at least occasional responsiveness to public opinion; and (6) create "mechanisms to ensure that the amount of dissent does not exceed the level it regards as desirable." Tushnet cites Singapore as an example of an authoritarian constitutionalist state, and connects the concept to that of hybrid regimes.[28]

### Economy

[edit]

Scholars such as Seymour Lipset,[29] Carles Boix, Susan Stokes,[30] Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Evelyne Stephens and John Stephens[31] argue that economic development increases the likelihood of democratization. Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi argue that while economic development makes democracies less likely to turn authoritarian, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that development causes democratization (turning an authoritarian state into a democracy).[32]

Eva Bellin argues that under certain circumstances the bourgeoise and labor are more likely to favor democratization, but less so under other circumstances.[33] Economic development can boost public support for authoritarian regimes in the short-to-medium term.[34]

According to Michael Albertus, most land reform programs tend to be implemented by authoritarian regimes that subsequently withhold property rights from the beneficiaries of the land reform. Authoritarian regimes do so to gain coercive leverage over rural populations.[35]

### Institutions

[edit]

Authoritarian regimes typically incorporate similar political institutions to that of democratic regimes, such as legislatures and judiciaries, although they may serve different purposes. Democratic regimes are marked by institutions that are essential to economic development and individual freedom, including representative legislatures and competitive political parties.[36][37] Most authoritarian regimes embrace these political structures, but use it in a way that reinforces their power.[36] Authoritarian legislatures, for example, are forums through which leaders may enhance their bases of support, share power, and monitor elites.[38] Additionally, authoritarian party systems are extremely unstable and unconducive to party development, largely due to monopolistic patterns of authority.[39] Judiciaries may be present in authoritarian states where they serve to repress political challengers, institutionalize punishment, and undermine the rule of law.[40]

Democratic and authoritarian arguably differ most prominently in their elections. Democratic elections are generally inclusive, competitive, and fair.[41] In most instances, the elected leader is appointed to act on behalf of the general will. Authoritarian elections, on the other hand, are frequently subject to fraud and extreme constraints on the participation of opposing parties.[39] Autocratic leaders employ tactics like murdering political opposition and paying election monitors to ensure victory.[36][42] The proportion of authoritarian regimes with elections and support parties has risen in recent years.[36] This is largely due to the increasing popularity of democracies and electoral autocracies, leading authoritarian regimes to imitate democratic regimes in hopes of receiving foreign aid and dodging criticism.[36][43] Flawed elections also give authoritarians a controlled way to monitor public sentiment.[44]

According to a 2018 study, most party-led dictatorships regularly hold popular elections. Prior to the 1990s, most of these elections had no alternative parties or candidates for voters to choose. Since the end of the Cold War, about two-thirds of elections in authoritarian systems allow for some opposition, but the elections are structured in a way to heavily favor the incumbent authoritarian regime.[45] In 2020, almost half of all authoritarian systems had multi-party governments.[46] Cabinet appointments by an authoritarian regime to outsiders can consolidate their rule by dividing the opposition and co-opting outsiders.[46]

Hindrances to free and fair elections in authoritarian systems may include:[45]

* Control of the media by the authoritarian incumbents.
* Interference with opposition campaigning.
* Electoral fraud.
* Violence against opposition.
* Large-scale spending by the state in favor of the incumbents.
* Permitting of some parties, but not others.
* Prohibitions on opposition parties, but not independent candidates.
* Allowing competition between candidates within the incumbent party, but not those who are not in the incumbent party.

### Interactions with other elites and the masses

[edit]

The foundations of stable authoritarian rule are that the authoritarian prevents contestation from the masses and other elites. The authoritarian regime may use co-optation or repression (or carrots and sticks) to prevent revolts.[47][48] Authoritarian rule entails a balancing act whereby the ruler has to maintain the support of other elites (frequently through the distribution of state and societal resources) and the support of the public (through distribution of the same resources): the authoritarian rule is at risk if the balancing act is lopsided, as it risks a coup by the elites or an uprising by the mass public.[49][50]

### Manipulation of information

[edit]

Main articles: Political censorship and Propaganda

According to a 2019 study by Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman, authoritarian regimes have over time become less reliant on violence and mass repression to maintain control. The study shows instead that authoritarians have increasingly resorted to manipulation of information as a means of control. Authoritarians increasingly seek to create an appearance of good performance, conceal state repression, and imitate democracy.[51]

While authoritarian regimes invest considerably in propaganda out of a belief that it enhances regime survival, scholars have offered mixed views as to whether propaganda is effective.[52]

### Systemic weakness and resilience

[edit]

Anarchist protest with sign reading "just say no to authoritarian rule"

Andrew J. Nathan notes that "regime theory holds that authoritarian systems are inherently fragile because of weak legitimacy, overreliance on coercion, over-centralization of decision making, and the predominance of personal power over institutional norms. ... Few authoritarian regimes – be they communist, fascist, corporatist, or personalist – have managed to conduct orderly, peaceful, timely, and stable successions."[53]

Political scientist Theodore M. Vestal writes that authoritarian political systems may be weakened through inadequate responsiveness to either popular or elite demands and that the authoritarian tendency to respond to challenges by exerting tighter control, instead of by adapting, may compromise the legitimacy of an authoritarian state and lead to its collapse.[19]

One exception to this general trend is the endurance of the authoritarian rule of the Chinese Communist Party which has been unusually resilient among authoritarian regimes. Nathan posits that this can be attributed to four factors such as (1) "the increasingly norm-bound nature of its succession politics"; (2) "the increase in meritocratic as opposed to factional considerations in the promotion of political elites"; (3) "the differentiation and functional specialization of institutions within the regime"; and (4) "the establishment of institutions for political participation and appeal that strengthen the CCP's legitimacy among the public at large."[53]

Some scholars have challenged notions that authoritarian states are inherently brittle systems that require repression and propaganda to make people comply with the authoritarian regime. Adam Przeworski has challenged this, noting that while authoritarian regimes do take actions that serve to enhance regime survival, they also engage in mundane everyday governance and their subjects do not hold a posture towards the regime at all moments of their life. He writes, "People in autocracies do not incessantly live under the shadow of dramatic historical events; they lead everyday routine lives."[54] Similarly, Thomas Pepinsky has challenged the common mental image of an authoritarian state as one of grim totalitarianism, desperate hardship, strict censorship, and dictatorial orders of murder, torture and disappearances. He writes, "life in authoritarian states is mostly boring and tolerable."[55]

### Violence

[edit]

Yale University political scientist Milan Svolik argues that violence is a common characteristic of authoritarian systems. Violence tends to be common in authoritarian states because of a lack of independent third parties empowered to settle disputes between the dictator, regime allies, regime soldiers and the masses.[47]

Authoritarians may resort to measures referred to as coup-proofing (structures that make it hard for any small group to seize power). Coup-proofing strategies include strategically placing family, ethnic, and religious groups in the military; creating of an armed force parallel to the regular military; and developing multiple internal security agencies with overlapping jurisdiction that constantly monitor one another.[56] Research shows that some coup-proofing strategies reduce the risk of coups occurring[57][58] and reduce the likelihood of mass protests.[59] However, coup-proofing reduces military effectiveness,[60][61][62][63] and limits the rents that an incumbent can extract.[64] A 2016 study shows that the implementation of succession rules reduce the occurrence of coup attempts.[65] Succession rules are believed to hamper coordination efforts among coup plotters by assuaging elites who have more to gain by patience than by plotting.[65] According to political scientists Curtis Bell and Jonathan Powell, coup attempts in neighboring countries lead to greater coup-proofing and coup-related repression in a region.[66] A 2017 study finds that countries' coup-proofing strategies are heavily influenced by other countries with similar histories.[67] A 2018 study in the Journal of Peace Research found that leaders who survive coup attempts and respond by purging known and potential rivals are likely to have longer tenures as leaders.[68] A 2019 study in Conflict Management and Peace Science found that personalist dictatorships are more likely to take coup-proofing measures than other authoritarian regimes; the authors argue that this is because "personalists are characterized by weak institutions and narrow support bases, a lack of unifying ideologies and informal links to the ruler."[69]

According to a 2019 study, personalist dictatorships are more repressive than other forms of dictatorship.[70]

## Typologies

[edit]

According to Yale professor Juan José Linz there a three main types of political regimes today: democracies, totalitarian regimes and, sitting between these two, authoritarian regimes (with hybrid regimes).[71][72]

According to University of Michigan professor Dan Slater, modern forms of authoritarianism are fundamentally dissimilar from historical forms of nondemocratic rule. He links modern authoritarianism to the era of mass politics, which began with the French Revolution.[73]

### Similar terms

[edit]

* An authoritarian regime has "a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people".[74] Unlike totalitarian states, they will allow social and economic institutions not under governmental control,[75] and tend to rely on passive mass acceptance rather than active popular support.[76]
* An Autocracy is a state/government in which one person possesses "unlimited power".
* A Totalitarian state is "based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures (such as censorship and terrorism)".[77] and are ruled by a single ruling party made up of loyal supporters.[78] Unlike autocracies, which "seek only to gain absolute political power and to outlaw opposition",[79] totalitarian states are characterized by an official ideology, which "seek only to gain absolute political power and to outlaw opposition",[79] and "seek to dominate every aspect of everyone's life as a prelude to world domination".[79]
* A Fascist state is autocratic and based on a political philosophy/movement, (such as that of the Fascisti of pre-WWII Italy) "that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition".[80]
* Authoritarian personality is the personality type treating authority figures with obedience. A study found evidence for both left-wing and right-wing authoritarianism.[81]

### Subtypes

[edit]

Several subtypes of authoritarian regimes have been identified by Linz and others.[82] Linz identified the two most basic subtypes as traditional authoritarian regimes and bureaucratic-military authoritarian regimes:

* Traditional authoritarian regimes are those "in which the ruling authority (generally a single person)" is maintained in power "through a combination of appeals to traditional legitimacy, patron-client ties and repression, which is carried out by an apparatus bound to the ruling authority through personal loyalties." An example is Ethiopia under Haile Selassie I.[82]Honoring South Korean President Park Chung-hee in Army Parade at Armed Forces Day on 1 October 1973
* Bureaucratic-military authoritarian regimes are those "governed by a coalition of military officers and technocrats who act pragmatically (rather than ideologically) within the limits of their bureaucratic mentality."[82] Mark J. Gasiorowski suggests that it is best to distinguish "simple military authoritarian regimes" from "bureaucratic authoritarian regimes" in which "a powerful group of technocrats uses the state apparatus to try to rationalize and develop the economy" such South Korea under Park Chung-hee.[82]

According to Barbara Geddes, there are seven typologies of authoritarian regimes: dominant party regimes, military regime, personalist regimes, monarchies, oligarchic regimes, indirect military regimes, or hybrids of the first three.[83]

Subtypes of authoritarian regimes identified by Linz are corporatist or organic-statistic, racial and ethnic "democracy" and post-totalitarian.[82]

* Corporatist authoritarian regimes "are those in which corporatism institutions are used extensively by the state to coopt and demobilize powerful interest groups." This type has been studied most extensively in Latin America.[82]
* Racial and ethnic "democracies" are those in which "certain racial or ethnic groups enjoy full democratic rights while others are largely or entirely denied those rights", such as in South Africa under apartheid.[82]
* Post-totalitarian authoritarian regimes are those in which totalitarian institutions (such as the party, secret police and state-controlled mass media[84]) remain, but where "ideological orthodoxy has declined in favor of routinization, repression has declined, the state's top leadership is less personalized and more secure, and the level of mass mobilization has declined substantially."[82] Examples include the Russian Federation and Soviet Eastern Bloc states in the mid-1980s.[82] The post-Mao Zedong People's Republic of China was viewed as post-totalitarian in the 1990s and early 2000s, with a limited degree of increase in pluralism and civil society.[85][86] however, in the 2010s, particularly after Xi Jinping succeeded as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and rose to power in 2012, Chinese state repression sharply increased, aided by digital control and mass surveillance.[87][88][89]

Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev and Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro on 25 October 2019

Authoritarian regimes are also sometimes subcategorized by whether they are more personalistic or populist.[82][additional citation(s) needed] Personalistic authoritarian regimes are characterized by arbitrary rule and authority exercised "mainly through patronage networks and coercion rather than through institutions and formal rules."[82] Personalistic authoritarian regimes have been seen in post-colonial Africa. By contrast, populist authoritarian regimes "are mobilizational regimes in which a strong, charismatic, manipulative leader rules through a coalition involving key lower-class groups."[82] Examples include Argentina under Juan Perón,[82] Russia under Vladimir Putin, Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser[82] and Venezuela under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro.[90][91]

A typology of authoritarian regimes by political scientists Brian Lai and Dan Slater includes four categories:

* machine (oligarchic party dictatorships);
* bossism (autocratic party dictatorships);
* juntas (oligarchic military dictatorships); and
* strongman (autocratic military dictatorships).[4]

Lai and Slater argue that single-party regimes are better than military regimes at developing institutions (e.g. mass mobilization, patronage networks and coordination of elites) that are effective at continuing the regime's incumbency and diminishing domestic challengers; Lai and Slater also argue that military regimes more often initiate military conflicts or undertake other "desperate measures" to maintain control as compared to single-party regimes.[4][3]

John Duckitt suggests a link between authoritarianism and collectivism, asserting that both stand in opposition to individualism.[92] Duckitt writes that both authoritarianism and collectivism submerge individual rights and goals to group goals, expectations and conformities.[93]

According to Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, authoritarian regimes that are created in social revolutions are far more durable than other kinds of authoritarian regimes.[94]

### Authoritarianism and democracy

[edit]

See also: Democratic backsliding and Democratization

Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024.[95] Blue countries are democratic, yellow are hybrid regimes, and brown are authoritarian governments. V-Dem Democracy Indices for 2024 with blue more democratic and brown more authoritarian

Authoritarianism and democracy are not necessarily fundamental opposites and may be thought of as poles at opposite ends of a scale, so that it is possible for some democracies to possess authoritarian elements, and for an authoritarian system to have democratic elements.[96][unreliable source?][97][98][verification needed] Authoritarian regimes may also be partly responsive to citizen grievances, although this is generally only regarding grievances that do not undermine the stability of the regime.[99][100] An illiberal democracy, or procedural democracy, is distinguished from liberal democracy, or substantive democracy, in that illiberal democracies lack features such as the rule of law, protections for minority groups, an independent judiciary and the real separation of powers.[101][102][103][104]

A further distinction that liberal democracies have rarely made war with one another; research has extended the theory and finds that more democratic countries tend to have few wars (sometimes called militarized interstate disputes) causing fewer battle deaths with one another and that democracies have far fewer civil wars.[105][106]

Research shows that the democratic nations have much less democide or murder by government. Those were also moderately developed nations before applying liberal democratic policies.[107] Research by the World Bank suggests that political institutions are extremely important in determining the prevalence of corruption and that parliamentary systems, political stability and freedom of the press are all associated with lower corruption.[108]

A 2006 study by economist Alberto Abadie has concluded that terrorism is most common in nations with intermediate political freedom. The nations with the least terrorism are the most and least democratic nations, and that "transitions from an authoritarian regime to a democracy may be accompanied by temporary increases in terrorism."[109] Studies in 2013 and 2017 similarly found a nonlinear relationship between political freedom and terrorism, with the most terrorist attacks occurring in partial democracies and the fewest in "strict autocracies and full-fledged democracies."[110] A 2018 study by Amichai Magen demonstrated that liberal democracies and polyarchies not only suffer fewer terrorist attacks as compared to other regime types, but also suffer fewer casualties in terrorist attacks as compared to other regime types, which may be attributed to higher-quality democracies' responsiveness to their citizens' demands, including "the desire for physical safety", resulting in "investment in intelligence, infrastructure protection, first responders, social resilience, and specialized medical care" which averts casualties.[110] Magen also stated that terrorism in closed autocracies sharply increased starting in 2013.[110]

Within national democratic governments, there may be subnational authoritarian enclaves. A prominent examples of this includes the Southern United States after Reconstruction, as well as areas of contemporary Argentina and Mexico.[111][112]

#### Competitive authoritarian regimes

[edit]

Another type of authoritarian regime is the competitive authoritarian regime, a type of civilian regime that arose in the post-Cold War era. In a competitive authoritarian regime, "formal democratic institutions exist and are widely viewed as the primary means of gaining power, but ... incumbents' abuse of the state places them at a significant advantage vis-à-vis their opponents."[113][114] The term was coined by Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way in their 2010 book of the same name to discuss a type of hybrid regime that emerged during and after the Cold War.[113][115]

Competitive authoritarian regimes differ from fully authoritarian regimes in that elections are regularly held, the opposition can openly operate without a high risk of exile or imprisonment and "democratic procedures are sufficiently meaningful for opposition groups to take them seriously as arenas through which to contest for power."[113] Competitive authoritarian regimes lack one or more of the three characteristics of democracies such as free elections (i.e. elections untainted by substantial fraud or voter intimidation); protection of civil liberties (i.e. the freedom of speech, press and association) and an even playing field (in terms of access to resources, the media and legal recourse).[116]

### Authoritarianism and fascism

[edit]

Authoritarianism is considered a core concept of fascism[117][118][119][120] and scholars agree that a fascist regime is foremost an authoritarian form of government, although not all authoritarian regimes are fascist. While authoritarianism is a defining characteristic of fascism, scholars argue that more distinguishing traits are needed to make an authoritarian regime fascist.[121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129]

### Authoritarian socialism

[edit]

These paragraphs are an excerpt from Authoritarian socialism.[edit]

Authoritarian socialism, or socialism from above,[130] is an economic and political system supporting some form of socialist economics while rejecting political pluralism. As a term, it represents a set of economic-political systems describing themselves as "socialist" and rejecting the liberal-democratic concepts of multi-party politics, freedom of assembly, habeas corpus, and freedom of expression, either due to fear of counter-revolution or as a means to socialist ends. Journalists and scholars have characterised several countries, most notably the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and their allies, as authoritarian socialist states.[131][132][133]

### Libertarian authoritarianism

[edit]

Main articles: Libertarian authoritarianism and Liberal autocracy

Multiple scholars have identified a form of libertarian authoritarianism emerging in the early 21st century. Wendy Brown describes it as emerging from neoliberalism, opposing both democracy and public institutions while defining freedom in terms of speech and actions that promote homophobia, white supremacy and male privilege.[134][135] Other scholars have connected it to QAnon[136] and to the Argentinian Presidency of Javier Milei.[137]

Carolin Amlinger and Oliver Nachtwey, in Offended Freedom: The Rise of Libertarian Authoritarianism, describe libertarian authoritarianism as arising from a backlash to government efforts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic and, more broadly, against the increasing complexity of the world, ultimately leading to hostility towards democracy.[138][139] Writing in Jacobin and New Statesman, Amlinger and Nachtwey define libertarian authoritarians as those who believe in the abolition of the democratic state on the basis of its restrictions on individual freedoms, and "consider the democratic state itself, the authorities and their regulations, to be invasive and harmful"; they described the fundamental basis of libertarian authoritarianism to be based in "post-truth politics", and that in the late-modern era, believers validate their opinions "with proto-scientific evidence, rumours, conspiracy theories and fake news". They describe neoliberalism as an additional factor contributing towards the recent rise of the ideology.[140][141] Individuals they identify as modern adherents to the ideology include Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Javier Milei, having merged their libertarianism with their "authoritarian tendencies".[140][141]

### Authoritarianism and totalitarianism

[edit]

Benito Mussolini, the founder of Italian fascism, called his regime the "Totalitarian State": "Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State."[142]

Totalitarianism is a label used by various political scientists to characterize the most tyrannical strain of authoritarian systems; in which the ruling elite, often subservient to a dictator, exert near-total control of the social, political, economic, cultural and religious aspects of society in the territories under its governance.[143]

Linz distinguished new forms of authoritarianism from personalistic dictatorships and totalitarian states, taking Francoist Spain as an example. Unlike personalistic dictatorships, new forms of authoritarianism have institutionalized representation of a variety of actors (in Spain's case, including the military, the Catholic Church, Falange, monarchists, technocrats and others). Unlike totalitarian states, the regime relies on passive mass acceptance rather than popular support.[76] According to Juan Linz the distinction between an authoritarian regime and a totalitarian one is that an authoritarian regime seeks to suffocate politics and political mobilization while totalitarianism seeks to control and use them.[71] Authoritarianism primarily differs from totalitarianism in that social and economic institutions exist that are not under governmental control. Building on the work of Yale political scientist Juan Linz, Paul C. Sondrol of the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs has examined the characteristics of authoritarian and totalitarian dictators and organized them in a chart:[75]

| Totalitarianism  | Authoritarianism

|
|

Charisma | High  | Low
Role conception  | Leader as function  | Leader as individual
Ends of power  | Public  | Private
Corruption | Low  | High
Official ideology | Yes  | No
Limited pluralism | No  | Yes
Legitimacy  | Yes  | No

Sondrol argues that while both authoritarianism and totalitarianism are forms of autocracy, they differ in three key dichotomies:

> (1) Unlike their bland and generally unpopular authoritarian brethren, totalitarian dictators develop a charismatic "mystique" and a mass-based, pseudo-democratic interdependence with their followers via the conscious manipulation of a prophetic image.

> (2) Concomitant role conceptions differentiate totalitarians from authoritarians. Authoritarians view themselves as individual beings largely content to control and often maintain the status quo. Totalitarian self-conceptions are largely teleological. The tyrant is less a person than an indispensable function to guide and reshape the universe.

> (3) Consequently, the utilisation of power for personal aggrandizement is more evident among authoritarians than totalitarians. Lacking the binding appeal of ideology, authoritarians support their rule by a mixture of instilling fear and granting rewards to loyal collaborators, engendering a kleptocracy.[75]

Kim Il Sung, founder of North Korea, established an authoritarian regime which was modeled after other totalitarian countries.[144]

Compared to totalitarianism, "the authoritarian state still maintains a certain distinction between state and society. It is only concerned with political power and as long as that is not contested it gives society a certain degree of liberty. Totalitarianism, on the other hand, invades private life and asphyxiates it."[145] Another distinction is that "authoritarianism is not animated by utopian ideals in the way totalitarianism is. It does not attempt to change the world and human nature."[145] Carl Joachim Friedrich writes that "a totalist ideology, a party reinforced by a secret police, and monopoly control of ... industrial mass society" are the three features of totalitarian regimes that distinguish them from other autocracies.[145]

Greg Yudin, a professor of political philosophy at the Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences, argues "political passivity and civic disengagement" are "key features" of authoritarianism, while totalitarianism relies on "mass mobilization, terror and homogeneity of beliefs".[146]

## Economic effects

[edit]

In 2010, Dani Rodrik wrote that democracies outperform autocracies in terms of long-term economic growth, economic stability, adjustments to external economic shocks, human capital investment, and economic equality.[147] A 2019 study by Daron Acemoglu, Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James A. Robinson found that democracy increases GDP per capita by about 20 percent over the long-term.[148] According to Amartya Sen, no functioning liberal democracy has ever suffered a large-scale famine.[149] Studies suggest that several health indicators (life expectancy and infant and maternal mortality) have a stronger and more significant association with democracy than they have with GDP per capita, size of the public sector or income inequality.[150] States that undergo democratic backsliding are more likely to face downgrades in their sovereign bond ratings.[151]

One of the few areas that some scholars have theorized that autocracies may have an advantage, is in industrialization.[152] In the 20th century, Seymour Martin Lipset argued that low-income authoritarian regimes have certain technocratic "efficiency-enhancing advantages" over low-income democracies that gives authoritarian regimes an advantage in economic development.[153] By contrast, Morton H. Halperin, Joseph T. Siegle and Michael M. Weinstein (2005) argue that democracies "realize superior development performance" over authoritarianism, pointing out that poor democracies are more likely to have steadier economic growth and less likely to experience economic and humanitarian catastrophes (such as refugee crises) than authoritarian regimes; that civil liberties in democracies act as a curb on corruption and misuse of resources; and that democracies are more adaptable than authoritarian regimes.[153]

## Military effects

[edit]

According to Allan C. Stam and Dan Reiter, liberal democracies have an advantage in battlefield performance over non-democracies and illiberal democracies.[154] They argue that this democratic advantage is derived from the fact that democratic soldiers fight harder, democratic states tend to ally together in war, and democracies can employ more economic resources towards combat.[154] Due to elevated fears against military coups against authoritarian regimes, authoritarian regimes may also put loyalists in the military. This may reduce military effectiveness as loyalty is prioritized over experience when filling key positions within the military.[155][156][157][158] However, critics argue that democracy itself makes little difference in war and that some other factors, such as overall power, determine whether a country would achieve victory or face defeat. In some cases, such as the Vietnam War, democracy may even have contributed to defeat.[159][160][161][162] Jasen Castillo argues that autocratic states may in certain circumstances have an advantage over democracies; for example, authoritarian regimes may have ideologies that require unconditional loyalty, which may contribute to military cohesion.[163]

According to Democratic peace theory, fully functioning democracies are less likely to go to war with each other. No similar advantage has been found with authoritarian regimes.[164]

## Historical trends

[edit]

### Pre-World War II

[edit]

Authoritarian rule before World War II includes short-lived dictatorships and has been claimed to be understudied.[165]

### Post-World War II anti-authoritarianism

[edit]

Main article: Anti-authoritarianism

Both World War II (ending in 1945) and the Cold War (ending in 1991) resulted in the replacement of authoritarian regimes by either democratic regimes or regimes that were less authoritarian.

World War II saw the defeat of the Axis powers by the Allied powers. All the Axis powers (Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan) had totalitarian or authoritarian governments, and two of the three were replaced by governments based on democratic constitutions. The Allied powers were an alliance of Democratic states and (later) the Communist Soviet Union. At least in Western Europe the initial post-war era embraced pluralism and freedom of expression in areas that had been under control of authoritarian regimes. The memory of fascism and Nazism was denigrated. The new Federal Republic of Germany banned its expression. In reaction to the centralism of the Nazi state, the new constitution of West Germany (Federal Republic of Germany) exercised "separation of powers" and placed "law enforcement firmly in the hands" of the sixteen Länder or states of the republic, not with the federal German government, at least not at first.[166]

Culturally there was also a strong sense of anti-authoritarianism based on anti-fascism in Western Europe. This was attributed to the active resistance from occupation and to fears arising from the development of superpowers.[167] Anti-authoritarianism also became associated with countercultural and bohemian movements such as the Beat Generation in the 1950s,[168] the hippies in the 1960s[169] and punks in the 1970s.[170]

In South America, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Chile and Uruguay moved away from dictatorships to democracy between 1982 and 1990.[171]

With the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the Soviet Union in 1991, the other authoritarian/totalitarian "half" of the Allied Powers of World War II collapsed. This led not so much to revolt against authority in general, but to the belief that authoritarian states (and state control of economies) were outdated.[172] The idea that "liberal democracy was the final form toward which all political striving was directed"[173] became very popular in Western countries and was celebrated in Francis Fukuyama's book The End of History and the Last Man.[173] According to Charles H. Fairbanks Jr., "all the new states that stumbled out of the ruins of the Soviet bloc, except Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, seemed indeed to be moving towards democracy in the early 1990s" as were the countries of East Central Europe and the Balkans.[174]

In December 2010, the Arab Spring arose in response to unrest over economic stagnation but also in opposition to oppressive authoritarian regimes, first in Tunisia, and spreading to Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Bahrain and elsewhere. Regimes were toppled in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and partially in Yemen while other countries saw riots, civil wars or insurgencies. Most Arab Spring revolutions failed to lead to enduring democratization. In the decade following the Arab Spring, of the countries in which an autocracy was toppled in the Arab spring, only Tunisia had become a genuine democracy; Egypt backslid to return to a military-run authoritarian state, while Libya, Syria and Yemen experienced devastating civil wars.[175][176]

### 21st-century

[edit]

Since 2005, observers noted what some have called a "democratic recession",[173][177] although some such as Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way have disputed that there was a significant democratic decline before 2013.[177] In 2018, the Freedom House declared that from 2006 to 2018 "113 countries" around the world showed "a net decline" in "political rights and civil liberties" while "only 62" experienced "a net improvement."[178] Its 2020 report marked the fourteenth consecutive year of declining scores.[179] By 2020, all countries marked as "not free" by Freedom House had also developed practices of transnational repression, aiming to police and control dissent beyond state borders.[180]

International trends in
democracy/authoritarianism  | countries becoming
more democratic  | countries becoming
more authoritarian

|
|

late 1990s  | 72  | 3
2021  | 15  | 33
source: V-Dem[181][182]

Writing in 2018, American political journalist David Frum stated: "The hopeful world of the very late 20th century – the world of NAFTA and an expanding NATO; of the World Wide Web 1.0 and liberal interventionism; of the global spread of democracy under leaders such as Václav Havel and Nelson Mandela – now looks battered and delusive."[183]

Michael Ignatieff wrote that Fukuyama's idea of liberalism vanquishing authoritarianism "now looks like a quaint artifact of a vanished unipolar moment"[173] and Fukuyama himself expressed concern.[172] By 2018, only one Arab Spring uprising (that in Tunisia) resulted in a transition to constitutional democratic governance[184] and a "resurgence of authoritarianism and Islamic extremism" in the region[185] was dubbed the Arab Winter.[186][187][188][189][190]

Various explanations have been offered for the new spread of authoritarianism. They include the downside of globalization, and the subsequent rise of populism and neo-nationalism,[191] and the success of the Beijing Consensus, i.e. the authoritarian model of the People's Republic of China.[192] In countries such as the United States, factors blamed for the growth of authoritarianism include the 2008 financial crisis and slower real wage growth[193][unreliable source?] as well as social media's elimination of so-called "gatekeepers" of knowledge – the equivalent of disintermediation in economics – so that a large fraction of the population considers to be opinion what were once "viewed as verifiable facts" – including everything from the danger of global warming to the preventing the spread of disease through vaccination – and considers to be fact what are actually only unproven fringe opinions.[194]

In United States politics, white supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi skinheads, and adherents of the Christian Identity, ideology have long operated as a loose network. In the internet age, far-right extremists throughout the U.S. and much of the West have consolidated further into a movement known as the Alt-Right, which has inspired numerous terrorist attacks while at the same time increasing the mainstream appeal of white supremacism.[195] According to Azani et al.:[195]

> The current resurgence of far-right ideology may be explained by a variety of factors, primarily, the strategic adjustment of white supremacists to soften overtly racist rhetoric in order to appeal to a wider audience. This new discourse attempts to normalize white supremacy, developing intellectual and theoretical foundations for racism based on the notion that the white race is at risk of eradication, threatened by the growing population of immigrants and people of colour. The pre-existing, offensive white supremacist, fascist and neo-Nazi ideas that drove the white power movement of the twentieth century were thus rebranded through a new innocuous defensive frame of white victimhood. As such, the new strategy of racist rhetoric has allowed the movement to co-opt mainstream political debates surrounding immigration and globalization, drawing large audiences through a deliberate obfuscation of the underlying ideology.

Far-right extremism has played a key role in promoting the Great Replacement and White genocide conspiracy theories, and an "acceleration" of racial conflict through violent means such as assassinations, murders, terrorist attacks, and societal collapse in order to achieve the building of a white ethnostate.[195] While many contemporary extreme far-right groups eschew the hierarchical structure of other authoritarian political organizations, they often explicitly promote cultural authoritarianism alongside xenophobia, racism, antisemitism, homophobia and misogyny, as well as authoritarian government interventions against perceived societal problems.[195]

### Contemporary

[edit]

There is no one consensus definition of authoritarianism, but several annual measurements are attempted, including Freedom House's annual Freedom in the World report. Some countries such as Venezuela, among others, that are currently or historically recognized as authoritarian did not become authoritarian upon taking power or fluctuated between an authoritarian, flawed democracy, and hybrid regime due to periods of democratic backsliding or democratization. Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia are often regarded as the most infamous examples of "totalitarian" systems. Some countries such as China and various fascist regimes have also been characterized as totalitarian, with some periods being depicted as more authoritarian, or totalitarian, than others.[citation needed]

States characterized as authoritarian are typically not rated as democracies by The Economist Democracy Index or as 'free' by Freedom House's Freedom in the World index, and do not reach a high score on V-Dem Democracy Indices. Contemporary examples of totalitarian states include North Korea (officially, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea).[196] According to an April 2025 survey, known as Bright Line Watch, of more than 500 U.S.-based political scientists shows that the vast majority think the United States is moving from liberal democracy to a form of authoritarianism.[197]

## See also

[edit]

* Absolute monarchy
* Authoritarian capitalism
* Authoritarian conservatism
* Authoritarian socialism
* Criticism of democracy
* Left-wing dictatorship
* Managed democracy
* Religion and authoritarianism
* Right-wing dictatorship
* U.S. policy toward authoritarian governments

## References

[edit]

Citations

1. ^ Kalu, Kalu N. (2019). A Functional Theory of Government, Law, and Institutions. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 161–. ISBN 978-1-4985-8703-7. OCLC 1105988740.
2. ^ Cerutti, Furio (2017). Conceptualizing Politics: An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Routledge. p. 17\. "Political scientists have outlined elaborated typologies of authoritarianism, from which it is not easy to draw a generally accepted definition; it seems that its main features are the non-acceptance of conflict and plurality as normal elements of politics, the will to preserve the status quo and prevent change by keeping all political dynamics under close control by a strong central power, and lastly, the erosion of the rule of law, the division of powers, and democratic voting procedures."
3. ^ a b Ezrow, Natasha M.; Frantz, Erica (2011). Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. Continuum. p. 17.
4. ^ a b c Lai, Brian; Slater, Dan (2006). "Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992". American Journal of Political Science. 50 (1): 113–126\. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00173.x. JSTOR 3694260.
5. ^ Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Problems of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353. ISBN 978-0-521-88252-1. Archived from the original on 18 October 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
6. ^ Diamond, Larry (2002). "Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid Regimes". Journal of Democracy. 13 (2): 21–35\. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0025. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 154815836. Archived from the original on 7 October 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
7. ^ Gunitsky, Seva (2015). "Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics". Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge University Press: 112–150\. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316161555.006. ISBN 978-1-107-09813-8. SSRN 2506195.
8. ^ Richard Shorten, Modernism and Totalitarianism: Rethinking the Intellectual Sources of Nazism and Stalinism, 1945 to the Present Archived 2020-01-09 at the Wayback Machine (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 256 (note 67): "For a long time the authoritative definition of authoritarianism was that of Juan J. Linz."
9. ^ Juan J. Linz, "An Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Spain," in Erik Allardt and Yrjö Littunen, eds., Cleavages, Ideologies, and Party Systems: Contributions to Comparative Political Sociology (Helsinki: Transactions of the Westermarck Society), pp. 291–342. Reprinted in Erik Allardt & Stine Rokkan, eds., Mas Politics: Studies in Political Sociology (New York: Free Press, 1970), pp. 251–283, 374–381.[ISBN missing]
10. ^ Gretchen Casper, Fragile Democracies: The Legacies of Authoritarian Rule. Archived 2020-01-09 at the Wayback Machine (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995), pp. 40–50 (citing Linz 1964).[ISBN missing]
11. ^ Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22–23\. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019. "I follow Przeworski et al. (2000), Boix (2003), and Cheibub et al. (2010) in defining a dictatorship as an independent country that fails to satisfy at least one of the following two criteria for democracy: (1) free and competitive legislative elections and (2) an executive that is elected either directly in free and competitive presidential elections or indirectly by a legislature in parliamentary systems. Throughout this book, I use the terms dictatorship and authoritarian regime interchangeably and refer to the heads of these regimes' governments as simply dictators or authoritarian leaders, regardless of their formal title."
12. ^ Geddes, Barbara; Wright, Joseph; Frantz, Erica (2014). "Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set". Perspectives on Politics. 12 (2): 313–331\. doi:10.1017/S1537592714000851. ISSN 1537-5927. S2CID 145784357. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
13. ^ Gehlbach, Scott; Sonin, Konstantin; Svolik, Milan W. (2016). "Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics". Annual Review of Political Science. 19 (1): 565–584\. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927. ISSN 1094-2939. S2CID 143064525.
14. ^ Cheibub, José Antonio; Gandhi, Jennifer; Vreeland, James Raymond (2010). "Democracy and dictatorship revisited". Public Choice. 143 (1/2): 67–101\. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2. ISSN 0048-5829. JSTOR 40661005. S2CID 45234838. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
15. ^ Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press. p. 20\. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019. "More demanding criteria may require that governments respect certain civil liberties – such as the freedom of religion (Schmitter and Karl 1991; Zakaria 1997) – or that the incumbent government and the opposition alternate in power at least once after the first seemingly free election (Huntington 1993; Przeworski et al. 2000; Cheibib et al. 2010)."
16. ^ Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press. pp. 8, 12, 22, 25, 88, 117. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
17. ^ Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press. p. 25\. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
18. ^ a b Geddes, Barbara (2024), Wolf, Anne (ed.), "How New Dictatorships Begin", The Oxford Handbook of Authoritarian Politics, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871996.013.3, ISBN 978-0-19-887199-6
19. ^ a b c d e f Theodore M. Vesta, Ethiopia: A Post-Cold War African State. Greenwood, 1999, p. 17.
20. ^ Przeworski, Adam (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-521-42335-9.
21. ^ Norris, Pippa; Inglehart, Ronald (2018). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the rise of authoritarian-populism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 14\. ISBN 978-1-108-42607-7.
22. ^ Michael Albertus & Victor Menaldo, "The Political Economy of Autocratic Constitutions", in Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (eds. Tom Ginsburg & Alberto Simpser: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 80.
23. ^ Tom Ginsburg & Alberto Simpser, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 3–10.
24. ^ Michael Albertus & Victor Menaldo, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (eds. Tom Ginsburg & Alberto Simpser: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 54.
25. ^ Davis S. Law & Mila Versteeg, "Constitutional Variation Among Strains of Authoritarianism" in Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (eds. Tom Ginsburg & Alberto Simpser: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 173.
26. ^ Michael Albertus & Victor Menaldo, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (eds. Tom Ginsburg & Alberto Simpser: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 54, 80.
27. ^ "Constitution of 1918". Encyclopedia.com. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
28. ^ a b c Tushnet, Mark (January 2015). "Authoritarian Constitutionalism" Archived 2020-01-17 at the Wayback Machine. Cornell Law Review. Cambridge University Press. 100 (2): 36–50. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107252523.004.
29. ^ Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959). "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy". The American Political Science Review. 53 (1): 69–105\. doi:10.2307/1951731. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1951731. S2CID 53686238.
30. ^ Boix, Carles; Stokes, Susan C. (July 2003). "Endogenous Democratization". World Politics. 55 (4): 517–549\. doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0019. ISSN 0043-8871. S2CID 18745191.
31. ^ Capitalist Development and Democracy. University Of Chicago Press. 1992.
32. ^ Przeworski, Adam; Limongi, Fernando (1997). "Modernization: Theories and Facts". World Politics. 49 (2): 155–183\. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0004. ISSN 0043-8871. JSTOR 25053996. S2CID 5981579.
33. ^ Bellin, Eva (January 2000). "Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late-Developing Countries". World Politics. 52 (2): 175–205\. doi:10.1017/S0043887100002598. ISSN 1086-3338. S2CID 54044493.
34. ^ Magaloni, Beatriz (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge Core. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511510274. ISBN 978-0-511-51027-4. Archived from the original on 5 April 2020. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
35. ^ Albertus, Michael (2021). Property without Rights: Origins and Consequences of the Property Rights Gap. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108891950. ISBN 978-1-108-83523-7. S2CID 241385526. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
36. ^ a b c d e Frantz, Erica (4 September 2018). Authoritarianism: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190880194.003.0005. ISBN 978-0-19-088019-4. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
37. ^ Pei, Minxin. "Economic Institutions, Democracy, and Development". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
38. ^ Bonvecchi, Alejandro; Simison, Emilia (1 July 2017). "Legislative Institutions and Performance in Authoritarian Regimes". Comparative Politics. 49 (4): 521–544\. doi:10.5129/001041517821273099. hdl:11336/76721. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
39. ^ a b Golosov, Grigorii V. (1 January 2013). "Authoritarian Party Systems: Patterns of Emergence, Sustainability and Survival". Comparative Sociology. 12 (5): 617–644\. doi:10.1163/15691330-12341274. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
40. ^ Shen-Bayh, Fiona Feiang (2022). Undue Process: Persecution and Punishment in Autocratic Courts. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009197151. ISBN 978-1-009-19713-7. Archived from the original on 27 May 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
41. ^ Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. (1984). "Democratic Elections and Government". World Affairs. 147 (2): 61–69\. JSTOR 20672013. Archived from the original on 11 March 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
42. ^ Magaloni, Beatriz (21 June 2010). "The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule". American Journal of Political Science. 54 (3): 751–765\. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00458.x. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
43. ^ Herre, Bastian; Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban (15 March 2013). "Democracy". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 11 March 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
44. ^ Gehlbach, Scott; Luo, Zhaotian; Shirikov, Anton; Vorobyev, Dmitriy (2025). "Is there really a dictator's dilemma? Information and repression in autocracy". American Journal of Political Science ajps.12952. doi:10.1111/ajps.12952. ISSN 1540-5907. Archived from the original on 11 February 2025. Retrieved 11 February 2025.
45. ^ a b Geddes, Barbara; Wright, Joseph; Frantz, Erica (2018). How Dictatorships Work. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137–140\. doi:10.1017/9781316336182. ISBN 978-1-316-33618-2. S2CID 226899229.
46. ^ a b Bokobza, Laure; Nyrup, Jacob (2024). "Authoritarian multiparty governments". Democratization. 31 (8): 1669–1694\. doi:10.1080/13510347.2024.2338858. ISSN 1351-0347. PMC 11601049. PMID 39611165.
47. ^ a b Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press. pp. 2, 15, 23. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
48. ^ Albertus, Michael; Fenner, Sofia; Slater, Dan (2018). Coercive Distribution by Michael Albertus. Elements in the Politics of Development. doi:10.1017/9781108644334. ISBN 978-1-108-64433-4. Archived from the original on 25 April 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
49. ^ Frye, Timothy (2021). Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin's Russia. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-21698-0.
50. ^ Mesquita, Bruce Bueno de; Smith, Alastair; Morrow, James D.; Siverson, Randolph M. (2005). The Logic of Political Survival. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-52440-7.
51. ^ Guriev, Sergei; Treisman, Daniel (2019). "Informational Autocrats". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 33 (4): 100–127\. doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.100. ISSN 0895-3309.
52. ^ Rosenfeld, Bryn; Wallace, Jeremy (2024). "Information Politics and Propaganda in Authoritarian Societies". Annual Review of Political Science. 27 (1): 263–281\. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-035951. ISSN 1094-2939. S2CID 267602602. Archived from the original on 24 February 2024. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
53. ^ a b Andrew J. Nathan, "Authoritarian Resilience". Archived 2018-10-05 at the Wayback Machine, Journal of Democracy, 14.1 (2003), pp. 6–17.
54. ^ Przeworski, Adam (2023). "Formal Models of Authoritarian Regimes: A Critique". Perspectives on Politics. 21 (3): 979–988\. doi:10.1017/S1537592722002067. ISSN 1537-5927. S2CID 252446987.
55. ^ Pepinsky, Thomas (9 January 2017). "Life in authoritarian states is mostly boring and tolerable". Vox. Archived from the original on 23 November 2020. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
56. ^ Quinlivan, James T. (1999). "Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East". International Security. 42 (2): 131–165\. doi:10.1162/016228899560202. S2CID 57563395. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
57. ^ Powell, Jonathan (1 December 2012). "Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d'état". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 56 (6): 1017–1040\. doi:10.1177/0022002712445732. ISSN 0022-0027. S2CID 54646102.
58. ^ Braithwaite, Jessica Maves; Sudduth, Jun Koga (1 January 2016). "Military purges and the recurrence of civil conflict". Research & Politics. 3 (1): 2053168016630730. doi:10.1177/2053168016630730. ISSN 2053-1680.
59. ^ Chin, John; Song, Wonjun; Wright, Joseph (2022). "Personalization of Power and Mass Uprisings in Dictatorships". British Journal of Political Science. 53 (1): 25–44\. doi:10.1017/S0007123422000114. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 249976554.
60. ^ Talmadge, Caitlin (2015). The Dictator's Army: Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-0175-7.
61. ^ Narang, Vipin; Talmadge, Caitlin (31 January 2017). "Civil-military Pathologies and Defeat in War". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 62 (7): 1379–1405\. doi:10.1177/0022002716684627. S2CID 151897298.
62. ^ Brown, Cameron S.; Fariss, Christopher J.; McMahon, R. Blake (1 January 2016). "Recouping after Coup-Proofing: Compromised Military Effectiveness and Strategic Substitution". International Interactions. 42 (1): 1–30\. doi:10.1080/03050629.2015.1046598. ISSN 0305-0629. S2CID 214653333.(subscription required)
63. ^ Bausch, Andrew W. (2017). "Coup-proofing and Military Inefficiencies: An Experiment". International Interactions. 44 (1): 1–32\. doi:10.1080/03050629.2017.1289938. ISSN 0305-0629. S2CID 157891333.
64. ^ Leon, Gabriel (1 April 2014). "Soldiers or politicians? Institutions, conflict, and the military's role in politics". Oxford Economic Papers. 66 (2): 533–556\. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1000.7058. doi:10.1093/oep/gpt024. ISSN 0030-7653.
65. ^ a b Frantz, Erica; Stein, Elizabeth A. (4 July 2016). "Countering Coups Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships". Comparative Political Studies. 50 (7): 935–962\. doi:10.1177/0010414016655538. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 157014887.
66. ^ Bell, Curtis; Powell, Jonathan (30 July 2016). "Will Turkey's coup attempt prompt others nearby?". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 21 October 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
67. ^ Böhmelt, Tobias; Ruggeri, Andrea; Pilster, Ulrich (1 April 2017). "Counterbalancing, Spatial Dependence, and Peer Group Effects*" (PDF). Political Science Research and Methods. 5 (2): 221–239\. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.55. hdl:20.500.11850/130560. ISSN 2049-8470. S2CID 56130442. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2017. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
68. ^ Easton, Malcolm R.; Siverson, Randolph M. (2018). "Leader survival and purges after a failed coup d'état". Journal of Peace Research. 55 (5): 596–608\. doi:10.1177/0022343318763713. S2CID 117585945.
69. ^ Escribà-Folch, Abel; Böhmelt, Tobias; Pilster, Ulrich (9 April 2019). "Authoritarian regimes and civil–military relations: Explaining counterbalancing in autocracies". Conflict Management and Peace Science. 37 (5): 559–579\. doi:10.1177/0738894219836285. hdl:10230/46774. ISSN 0738-8942. S2CID 159416397.
70. ^ Frantz, Erica; Kendall-Taylor, Andrea; Wright, Joseph; Xu, Xu (2020). "Personalization of Power and Repression in Dictatorships". The Journal of Politics. 82: 372–377\. doi:10.1086/706049. ISSN 0022-3816. S2CID 203199813.
71. ^ a b Juan José Linz (2000). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Lynne Rienner Publisher. p. 143\. ISBN 978-1-55587-890-0. OCLC 1172052725.
72. ^ Michie, Jonathan, ed. (2014). Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences. Routledge. p. 95\. ISBN 978-1-135-93226-8.
73. ^ Slater, Dan (2024), "Authoritarianism's Historical Entanglements", The Oxford Handbook of Authoritarian Politics, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871996.013.2, ISBN 978-0-19-887199-6
74. ^ "Definition of authoritarian". Merriam Webster. Archived from the original on 5 March 2008. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
75. ^ a b c Sondrol, P. C. (2009). "Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner". Journal of Latin American Studies. 23 (3): 599. doi:10.1017/S0022216X00015868. S2CID 144333167.
76. ^ a b Todd Landman, Studying Human Rights (Routledge, 2003), p. 71 (citing Linz 1964 and others).
77. ^ "Definition of totalitarian". Merriam Webster. Archived from the original on 24 April 2009. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
78. ^ "Totalitarianism and autocracy". Britannica. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
79. ^ a b c (according to Hannah Arendt)
80. ^ "Definition of fascism". Merriam Webster. Archived from the original on 22 August 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
81. ^ Conway III, Lucian Gideon; Zubrod, Alivia; Chan, Linus; McFarland, James D.; Van de Vliert, Evert (8 February 2023). "Is the myth of left-wing authoritarianism itself a myth?". Frontiers in Psychology. 13 1041391\. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041391. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 9944136. PMID 36846476.
82. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Mark J. Gasiorowski, The Political Regimes Project, in On Measuring Democracy: Its Consequences and Concomitants (ed. Alex Inketes), 2006, pp. 110–111.
83. ^ Geddes, Barbara; Wright, Joseph; Frantz, Erica (2014). "Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set". Perspectives on Politics. 12 (2): 313–331\. doi:10.1017/S1537592714000851. ISSN 1537-5927. S2CID 145784357. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
84. ^ Heinrich, Andreas; Pleines, Heiko (2018). "The Meaning of 'Limited Pluralism' in Media Reporting under Authoritarian Rule". Politics and Governance. 6 (2): 103. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i2.1238.
85. ^ O'Brien, Maire (1998). "Dissent and the emergence of civil society in post-totalitarian China". Journal of Contemporary China. 7 (17): 153–166\. doi:10.1080/10670569808724310.
86. ^ Lai, H. H. (2006). "Religious policies in post-totalitarian China: Maintaining political monopoly over a reviving society". Journal of Chinese Political Science. 11: 55–77\. doi:10.1007/BF02877033. S2CID 154504959.
87. ^ Mozur, Paul; Krolik, Aaron (17 December 2019). "A Surveillance Net Blankets China's Cities, Giving Police Vast Powers". New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
88. ^ Qiang, Xiao (21 February 2018). "The rise of China as a digital totalitarian state". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
89. ^ Clarke, Michael (10 March 2018). "In Xinjiang, China's 'Neo-Totalitarian' Turn Is Already a Reality". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
90. ^ Juan de Onis, "After Chavez, Authoritarianism Still Threatens Latin America"[usurped], World Affairs (May 15, 2013): "the followers of the late President Hugo Chávez continue to apply the playbook of authoritarian populism throughout Latin America in their pursuit of more power...one of the Mercosur partners are challenging the basic political practices of authoritarian populism implanted in Venezuela."
91. ^ Kurt Weyland, "Latin America's Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left". Archived 2018-11-25 at the Wayback Machine, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 23, Issue 3 (July 2013), pp. 18–32.
92. ^ Duckitt, J. (1989). "Authoritarianism and Group Identification: A New View of an Old Construct". Political Psychology. 10 (1): 63–84\. doi:10.2307/3791588. JSTOR 3791588.
93. ^ Kemmelmeier, M.; Burnstein, E.; Krumov, K.; Genkova, P.; Kanagawa, C.; Hirshberg, M. S.; Erb, H. P.; Wieczorkowska, G.; Noels, K. A. (2003). "Individualism, Collectivism, and Authoritarianism in Seven Societies". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 34 (3): 304. doi:10.1177/0022022103034003005. S2CID 32361036.
94. ^ Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan (2022). Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-16952-1.
95. ^ "EIU Democracy Index 2020 – World Democracy Report". Economist Intelligence Unit. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
96. ^ Frantz, Erica (2018). "Authoritarian Politics: Trends and Debates". Politics and Governance. 6 (2): 87–89\. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i2.1498 – via Cogitatio Press.
97. ^ Koesel, Karrie J.; Bunce, Valerie; Weiss, Jessica Chen (2020). "In South Carolina, Democrats debated when a dictator is really a dictator. So what's the answer?". The Washington Post (Monkey Cage). Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
98. ^ Koesel, Karrie; Bunce, Valerie; Weiss, Jessica (2020). Citizens and the State in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparing China and Russia. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-009349-5. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
99. ^ Truex, Rory (2016). Making Autocracy Work: Representation and Responsiveness in Modern China. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316771785. ISBN 978-1-107-17243-2. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
100. ^ Lueders, Hans (2022). "Electoral Responsiveness in Closed Autocracies: Evidence from Petitions in the former German Democratic Republic". American Political Science Review. 116 (3): 827–842\. doi:10.1017/S0003055421001386. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 245452279. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
101. ^ Thomas H. Henriksen, American Power after the Berlin Wall (Palgrave Macmillan: 2007), p. 199: "experts emphasize that elections alone, without the full democratic panoply of an independent judiciary, free press, and viable political parties, constitute, in reality, illiberal democracies, which still menace their neighbors and destabilize their regions."
102. ^ David P. Forsythe, Human Rights in International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2012), p. 231: "Illiberal democracies may have reasonably free and fair national elections based on broad suffrage, but they do not counteract the tyranny of the majority with effective protections for ethnic and religious minorities or various types of dissenters."
103. ^ Rod Hague & Martin Harrop, Political Science: A Comparative Introduction (7th ed.: Palgrave Macmillan: 2007), p. 259: "The gradual implementation of the rule of law and due process is an accomplishment of liberal politics, provide a basis for distinguishing liberal from illiberal democracies, and both from authoritarian regimes."
104. ^ Vladimir Popov, "Circumstances versus Policy Choices: Why Has the Economic Performance of the Soviet Successor States Been So Poor" in After the Collapse of Communism: Comparative Lessons of Transition (eds. Michael McFaul & Kathryn Stoner-Weiss: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 20: "The least efficient institutions are in illiberal democracies combining poor rule of law with democracy ... Less democratic regimes with weak rule of law ... appear to do better than illiberal democracies in maintaining institutional capacity."
105. ^ Hegre, Håvard; Ellington, Tanja; Gates, Scott & Nils Petter Gleditsch (2001). "Towards A Democratic Civil Peace? Opportunity, Grievance and Civil War 1816–1992". American Political Science Review. 95: 33–48\. doi:10.1017/S0003055401000119. S2CID 7521813. Archived from the original on 6 April 2004.
106. ^ Ray, James Lee (2013). Elman, Colin; Miriam Fendius Elman (eds.). A Lakatosian View of the Democratic Peace Research Program From Progress in International Relations Theory (PDF). MIT Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2006.
107. ^ Rummel, R. J. (1997). Power kills: democracy as a method of nonviolence. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56000-297-0.
108. ^ Daniel Lederman, Norman Loayza, & Rodrigo Res Soares, "Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter" Archived 2021-01-19 at the Wayback Machine, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2708 (November 2001).
109. ^ Abadie, Alberto (May 2006). "Poverty, Political Freedom, and the Roots of Terrorism". American Economic Review. 96 (2): 50–56\. doi:10.1257/000282806777211847. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
110. ^ a b c Magen, Amichai (January 2018). "Fighting Terrorism: The Democracy Advantage". Journal of Democracy. 29 (1): 111–125\. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0009. S2CID 158598818. Archived from the original on 24 March 2020. Retrieved 24 March 2020.
111. ^ Gibson, Edward L. (2013). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-19223-1. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 28 November 2022.
112. ^ Eaton, Kent; Giraudy, Agustina (2025). "What Can Latin America Tell Us about Subnational Democratic Erosion in the United States?". Perspectives on Politics: 1–11\. doi:10.1017/S1537592725000015. ISSN 1537-5927.
113. ^ a b c Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge University Press. pp. 5–7\. ISBN 978-1-139-49148-8. Archived from the original on 12 June 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2019.
114. ^ Mufti, Mariam (2018). "What Do We Know about Hybrid Regimes after Two Decades of Scholarship?". Politics and Governance. 6 (5): 112–119\. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i2.1400.
115. ^ Tomasky, Michael (1 July 2019). "Do the Republicans Even Believe in Democracy Anymore?". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 3 July 2019.
116. ^ Levitsky & Way (2010), pp. 7–12.
117. ^ Nolte, Ernst (1965). The Three Faces of Fascism: Action Française, Italian Fascism, National Socialism. Translated by Leila Vennewitz. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 300. ISBN 978-0-03-052240-6.
118. ^ Turner, Henry Ashby (1975). Reappraisals of Fascism. New Viewpoints. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-531-05579-3. "[Fascism]'s goals of radical and authoritarian nationalism".
119. ^ Hagtvet, Bernt; Larsen, Stein Ugelvik; Myklebust, Jan Petter, eds. (1984). Who Were the Fascists: Social Roots of European Fascism. Columbia University Press. p. 424. ISBN 978-82-00-05331-6. "[...] organized form of integrative radical nationalist authoritarianism".
120. ^ Paxton, Robert (2004). The Anatomy of Fascism. Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 32, 45, 173. ISBN 978-1-4000-4094-0.
121. ^ Weber, Eugen (1964). Varieties of fascism : doctrines of revolution in the twentieth century (reprint ed.). New York: Van Nostrand. ISBN 978-0-89874-444-6. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
122. ^ Laclau, Ernesto (1977). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory : capitalism, fascism, populism (English-language ed.). London: Verso. ISBN 978-1-84467-788-7.
123. ^ Fritzsche, Peter (1990). Rehearsals for fascism : populism and political mobilization in Weimar Germany (1st printing ed.). New York: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-19-505780-5.
124. ^ Griffin, Roger (1991). The nature of fascism (1st American ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-07132-5.
125. ^ Payne, Stanley G. (1995). A history of fascism, 1914–45. London: UCL Press. ISBN 978-0-299-14874-4.
126. ^ Eatwell, Roger (1996). Fascism : a history (1st American ed.). New York: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-7139-9147-5.
127. ^ Laqueur, Walter (1996). Fascism : past, present, future (reprint ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-511793-6.
128. ^ Reich, Wilhelm (2000). The mass psychology of fascism (3rd revised and enlarged ed.). New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. ISBN 978-0-374-50884-5.
129. ^ Paxton, Robert (2004). The Anatomy of Fascism (1st ed.). New York: Knopf Imprint. ISBN 978-1-4000-4094-0.
130. ^ Draper, Hal (1970) [196 3]. Two Souls of Socialism (revised ed.). Highland Park, Michigan: International Socialists. Archived from the original on 20 January 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
131. ^ Huntington 1970.
132. ^ Löwy 1986, p. 264.
133. ^ Amandae 2003.
134. ^ Brown, Wendy; Littler, Jo (Spring 2018). "Where the fires are". Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture. 68 (68): 14–25\. doi:10.3898/136266218822845619. ISSN 1741-0797.
135. ^ Runyan, Anne Sisson (November–December 2018). "What Is Intersectionality and Why Is It Important?". Academe. 104 (6): 10–14\. ISSN 0190-2946. JSTOR 26606288. "This political moment is fueled by what political theorist Wendy Brown calls "libertarian authoritarianism." Brown defines libertarian authoritarianism as both an extension and a result of neoliberalism: it simultaneously guts public institutions, undermines democracy, and defines freedom as the freedom to be sexist, racist, homophobic, and xenophobic and to engage in speech and actions that uphold the violence of white male supremacy."
136. ^ Cárcel, Roche; Antonio, Juan (1 June 2023). "The Religious Genesis of Conspiracy Theories and Their Consequences for Democracy and Religion: The Case of QAnon". Religions. 14 (6): 734. doi:10.3390/rel14060734. hdl:10045/134890. ISSN 2077-1444. "We will conclude by pointing out that QAnon affects the coherence and stability of religious beliefs and democracy; in fact, it can be seen as libertarian authoritarianism and populism, advocating a sick freedom, the ultimate expression of the modern feeling of individual powerlessness and of a Modernity that has failed to deliver on its promises."
137. ^ Boris, Dieter; Eser, Patrick (31 May 2024). "The Mysterious Rise of the »Messiah« Milei: Argentina as an Experimental Laboratory for Libertarian Authoritarianism?". PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft. 54 (215): 325–350\. doi:10.32387/prokla.v54i215.2126. ISSN 2700-0311.
138. ^ Amlinger, Carolin; Nachtwey, Oliver (December 2024). Offended Freedom: The Rise of Libertarian Authoritarianism. Wiley. Retrieved 22 February 2025.
139. ^ Heinz, Janine (2024). "Libertärer Autoritarismus in Österreich–eine empirische Annäherung". Die Auswirkungen der Corona-Pandemie auf die österreichische Gesellschaft. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG: 353–392\. doi:10.5771/9783748942696-353. ISBN 978-3-7489-4269-6. "In 2022, the sociologists Carolin Amlinger and Oliver Nachtwey published a much-acclaimed book in which they argue that the Corona crisis has given rise to a new form of "libertarian authoritarianism". This new authoritarianism is characterized by the fact that individual freedom is not seen as relative but as an absolute right and, as a result, any governmental interference with the private sphere is seen as an attack on human rights and freedom of expression."
140. ^ a b Nachtwey, Oliver; Amlinger, Carolin (7 December 2023). "The new authoritarian personality". New Statesman. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
141. ^ a b Amlinger, Carolin; Nachtwey, Oliver (29 January 2025). "In Elon Musk, Libertarianism and Authoritarianism Combine". Jacobin. Archived from the original on 30 January 2025. Retrieved 12 February 2025.
142. ^ Delzell, Charles F. (Spring 1988). "Remembering Mussolini". The Wilson Quarterly. 12 (2). Washington, D.C.: Wilson Quarterly: 127. JSTOR 40257305. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved 24 April 2022. Retrieved April 8, 2022
143. ^ The Concise Encyclopedia of Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge. 2013. pp. 51, 391. ISBN 978-1-57958-268-5.
144. ^ Bluth, C. (2011). Crisis on the Korean Peninsula. Potomac Books. p. 62\. ISBN 978-1-57488-887-4. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
145. ^ a b c Radu Cinpoes, Nationalism and Identity in Romania: A History of Extreme Politics from the Birth of the State to EU Accession, p. 70.
146. ^ Tavernise, Sabrina (9 April 2022). "Putin's War in Ukraine Shatters an Illusion in Russia". The New York Times. New York Times.
147. ^ Rodrik, Dani (9 August 2010). "The Myth of Authoritarian Growth | by Dani Rodrik". Project Syndicate. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
148. ^ Acemoglu, Daron; Naidu, Suresh; Restrepo, Pascual; Robinson, James A. (2019). "Democracy Does Cause Growth". Journal of Political Economy. 127 (1): 47–100\. doi:10.1086/700936. hdl:1721.1/124287. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 222452675. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
149. ^ Sen, A. K. (1999). "Democracy as a Universal Value". Journal of Democracy. 10 (3): 3–17\. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055. S2CID 54556373.
150. ^ Franco, Á.; Álvarez-Dardet, C.; Ruiz, M. T. (2004). "Effect of democracy on health: ecological study". BMJ. 329 (7480): 1421–1423\. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1421. PMC 535957. PMID 15604165.
151. ^ Yoo, Seong Hun (2025). "Economic costs of democratic backsliding: how does democratic backsliding affect sovereign bond ratings?". Socio-Economic Review mwaf016. doi:10.1093/ser/mwaf016. ISSN 1475-1461.
152. ^ Gerring, John; Gjerløw, Haakon; Knutsen, Carl Henrik (2022). "Regimes and industrialization". World Development. 152 105791\. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105791. hdl:10852/89922. ISSN 0305-750X.
153. ^ a b Morton H. Halperin, Joseph T. Siegle, & Michael M. Weinstein, The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace. Archived 2015-10-07 at the Wayback Machine (Council on Foreign Relations/Psychology Press, 2005).
154. ^ a b Reiter, Dan; Stam, Allan C. (2002). Democracies at War. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08949-2. JSTOR j.ctt7s7tq. Archived from the original on 12 November 2023. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
155. ^ Talmadge, Caitlin (2015). The Dictator's Army: Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-0175-7. Archived from the original on 3 August 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
156. ^ Narang, Vipin; Talmadge, Caitlin (31 January 2017). "Civil-military Pathologies and Defeat in War". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 62 (7): 1379–1405\. doi:10.1177/0022002716684627. S2CID 151897298.
157. ^ Biddle, Stephen; Zirkle, Robert (1 June 1996). "Technology, civil-military relations, and warfare in the developing world". Journal of Strategic Studies. 19 (2): 171–212\. doi:10.1080/01402399608437634. ISSN 0140-2390. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
158. ^ Paine, Jack (2022). "Reframing The Guardianship Dilemma: How the Military's Dual Disloyalty Options Imperil Dictators". American Political Science Review. 116 (4): 1425–1442\. doi:10.1017/S0003055422000089. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 247278896. Archived from the original on 5 March 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
159. ^ Downes, Alexander B. (2009). "How Smart and Tough Are Democracies? Reassessing Theories of Democratic Victory in War". International Security. 33 (4): 9–51\. doi:10.1162/isec.2009.33.4.9. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 40207151. S2CID 5275270.
160. ^ Reiter, Dan; Stam, Allan C.; Downes, Alexander B. (2009). "Another Skirmish in the Battle over Democracies and War". International Security. 34 (2): 194–204\. doi:10.1162/isec.2009.34.2.194. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 40389217. S2CID 18796232. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
161. ^ Brown, Michael E.; Coté, Owen R.; Lynn-Jones, Sean M; Miller, Steven E. (2011). Do Democracies Win Their Wars?. International Security Readers. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-51590-0. Archived from the original on 1 July 2022. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
162. ^ Merom, Gil (2003). How Democracies Lose Small Wars: State, Society, and the Failures of France in Algeria, Israel in Lebanon, and the United States in Vietnam. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808227. ISBN 978-0-521-80403-5. Archived from the original on 11 April 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
163. ^ Castillo, Jasen J. (2014). Endurance and War: The National Sources of Military Cohesion. Stanford University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvqr1d70. ISBN 978-0-8047-8910-3. JSTOR j.ctvqr1d70.
164. ^ "Democratic peace | Political Science, International Relations & Conflict Resolution | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 17 April 2025.
165. ^ Morgenbesser, Lee (2024). "The Lost Works of Nondemocratic Rule". The Oxford Handbook of Authoritarian Politics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871996.013.62. ISBN 978-0-19-887199-6.
166. ^ The Federal Police Archived 2018-10-05 at the Wayback Machine. Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community of Germany
167. ^ Cox, David (2005). Sign Wars: The Culture Jammers Strike Back!. LedaTape Organisation. p. 108\. ISBN 978-0-9807701-5-5. Retrieved 22 October 2011.
168. ^ "Retired Site PBS Programs". pbs.org. Archived from the original on 7 July 2007. Retrieved 4 September 2016.
169. ^ "The way of the hippie is antithetical to all repressive hierarchical power structures since they are adverse to the hippie goals of peace, love and freedom ... Hippies don't impose their beliefs on others. Instead, hippies seek to change the world through reason and by living what they believe."Stone, Skip. "The Way of the Hippy". www.hipplanet.com. Archived from the original on 26 August 2003. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
170. ^ McLaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. p. 10\. ISBN 978-0-7546-6196-2.
171. ^ "The challenge of the past". The Economist. 22 October 1998. Archived from the original on 18 October 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
172. ^ a b Tharoor, Ishaan (9 February 2017). "The man who declared 'the end of history' fears for democracy's future". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 30 November 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
173. ^ a b c d Ignatieff, Michael (10 July 2014). "Are the Authoritarians Winning?". New York Review of Books. 65 (11). Archived from the original on 22 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
174. ^ Fairbanks, Charles H. Jr. (16 January 2014). "Causes of Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Republics". Heinrich Boell Stiftung. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 5 October 2018.
175. ^ Bradley, Matt (19 December 2020). "10 years after Arab Spring, autocratic regimes hold the upper hand". NBC News. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
176. ^ Robinson, Kali (2 December 2020). "The Arab Spring at Ten Years: What's the Legacy of the Uprisings?". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 1 June 2023. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
177. ^ a b Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan (January 2015). "The Myth of Democratic Recession" (PDF). Journal of Democracy. 26 (1): 45–58\. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0007. S2CID 154831503. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
178. ^ "Freedom in the World 2018 Democracy in Crisis". Freedom House. Archived from the original on 7 October 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
179. ^ "New Report: Freedom in the World 2020 finds established democracies are in decline". Freedom House. Archived from the original on 15 September 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
180. ^ Tsourapas, Gerasimos (2020). "Global Autocracies: Strategies of Transnational Repression, Legitimation, and Co-Optation in World Politics". International Studies Review. 23 (3): 616–644\. doi:10.1093/isr/viaa061. ISSN 1521-9488.
181. ^ Leonhardt, David (17 September 2022). "Democracy Challenged 'A Crisis Coming': The Twin Threats to American Democracy". The New York Times. New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved 20 September 2022.
182. ^ "Democracy Report 2022 Autocratization Changing Nature?" (PDF). V-Dem. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 September 2022.
183. ^ Frum, David (November 2018). "The Republican Party Needs to Embrace Liberalism". Atlantic. Archived from the original on 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
184. ^ Ruthven, Malise (23 June 2016). "How to Understand ISIS". New York Review of Books. 63 (11). Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
185. ^ Phua, Yun Ru (31 March 2015). "After Every Winter Comes Spring: Tunisia's Democratic Flowering – Berkeley Political Review". Bpr.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on 29 July 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
186. ^ "Middle East review of 2012: the Arab Winter". The Telegraph. 31 December 2012. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
187. ^ "Analysis: Arab Winter is coming to Baghdad". The Telegraph. The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 14 July 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
188. ^ "Expert Warns of America's Coming 'Arab Winter'". CBN. 8 September 2014. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
189. ^ "The Arab Winter". The New Yorker. 28 December 2011. Archived from the original on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
190. ^ "Arab Spring or Arab Winter?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
191. ^ Bhagavan, Manu (21 March 2016). "We are witnessing the rise of global authoritarianism on a chilling scale". Qz.com. Archived from the original on 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
192. ^ Cowen, Tyler (3 April 2017). "Opinion: China's Success Explains Authoritarianism's Allure". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 18 August 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
193. ^ Cowen, Tyler (4 April 2017). "Why is authoritarianism on the rise?". marginalrevolution.com. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
194. ^ Kaiser, Charles (8 April 2018). "Can it Happen Here? review: urgent studies in rise of authoritarian America (Review of Cass Sunstein book Can It Happen Here?: Authoritarianism in America)". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
195. ^ a b c d Azani, Eitan; Koblenz-Stenzler, Liram; Atiyas-Lvovsky, Lorena; Ganor, Dan; Ben-Am, Arie; Meshulam, Delilah (2020). "The Development and Characterization of Far-Right Ideologies". The Far Right – Ideology, Modus Operandi and Development Trends. International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. pp. 13–36\. Archived from the original on 12 June 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
196. ^ "Totalitarianism". The Concise Encyclopedia of Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge. 2013. p. 391\. ISBN 978-1-57958-268-5.
197. ^ "Hundreds of scholars say U.S. is swiftly heading toward authoritarianism". NPR. 22 April 2025.

## Bibliography

[edit]

* Amandae, Sonja (2003). Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-01654-2.
* Huntington, Samuel P. (1970). Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-party Systems. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00569-7.
* Linz, Juan J. (1964). "An Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Spain". In Allard, Eric; Littunen, Yrjo. Cleavages, Ideologies and Party Systems. Helsinki: Academic Bookstore.
* Löwy, Michael (1986). "Mass organization, party, and state: Democracy in the transition to socialism". Transition and Development: Problems of Third World Socialism. 94.

## Further reading

[edit]

* Frantz; Erica; Geddes, Barbara; Wrights, Joseph (2018). How Dictatorships Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316336182.

## External links

[edit]

* Quotations related to Authoritarianism at Wikiquote

* v
* t
* e

Authoritarian and totalitarian forms of government

Forms|

* Absolute monarchy
* Autocracy
* Liberal
* Tsarist
* Communist state
* Counterintelligence state
* Dictatorship
* Benevolent
* Civilian
* Constitutional
* Dictablanda
* Grassroots
* Military
* Proletarian
* Right-wing
* Dominant-party system
* Illiberal democracy
* Totalitarian
* Libertarian authoritarianism
* Mafia state
* Managerial state
* Mediacracy
* Ochlocracy
* One-party state
* Oligarchy
* Police state
* Theocracy
* Islamic state
* Tyranny
* Majoritarian
* Soft

Ideologies|

* Authoritarian conservatism
* Chiangism
* Francoism
* Putinism
* Metaxism
* Authoritarian capitalism
* Pinochetism
* Authoritarian socialism
* Marxism–Leninism
* Stalinism
* Maoism
* Deng Xiaoping Theory
* Xi Jinping Thought
* Juche
* Despotism
* Enlightened
* Soft
* Ecoauthoritarianism
* Fascism
* Eco
* Neo
* Imperialism
* Nazism
* Neo
* Religious
* Caesaropapism
* Khomeinism
* Ziaism
* Shōwa Statism
* Techno

See also|

* Democracy indices
* Deep state
* Inverted totalitarianism
* Personality
* Leadership style
* Left-wing
* Right-wing
* Social dominance orientation
* Statism
* Strongman
* List of totalitarian states

Links to related articles

* v
* t
* e

Fascism

Themes

| Core tenets|

* Actual idealism
* Aestheticization of politics
* Anti-communism
* Anti-intellectualism
* Anti-materialism
* Anti-pacifism
* Authoritarianism
* Chauvinism
* Class collaboration
* Conspiracism
* Corporatism
* Cult of personality
* Dictatorship
* Direct action
* Dirigisme
* Economic interventionism
* Eugenics
* Heroic capitalism
* Heroic realism
* Heroism
* Imperialism
* Indoctrination
* Irrationalism
* Machismo
* Masculinity
* Militarism
* National syndicalism
* Nationalism
* Integral
* Palingenetic
* Ultra
* New Man
* One-party state
* Perpetual war
* Populism
* Proletarian nation
* Propaganda
* Racism
* Reactionary modernism
* Social Darwinism
* Social interventionism
* Social order
* State capitalism
* Statolatry
* Supercapitalism
* Syncretism
* Third Position
* Totalitarianism

|

Topics|

* Definitions
* Economics
* Fascism and ideology
* Fascism worldwide
* Symbolism

Variants

* Arab
* Argentine
* Nacionalismo
* Orthodox Peronism
* Austrian
* Banderism
* Brazilian
* British
* Christian
* Christian Identity
* Mexican synarchism
* Clerical
* Crypto
* Eco
* English
* Falangism
* French
* Doriotism
* Pétainism
* Neo-Pétainism
* Jeune Nation
* L'Œuvre Française
* Valoisism
* Hindutva
* Hungarism
* Hutu
* Irish
* Islamic
* Ziaism
* Italian
* Intransigent
* Japanese
* Emperor-system
* Statism
* Restoration
* Ultra
* Jewish/Israeli
* Kahanism
* Revisionist Maximalism
* Korean
* Ilminism
* Nyulaiteu
* Latvian
* Mystical
* Nazism
* Austrian
* Esoteric
* Hitlerism
* Neo-Nazism
* Russian
* Strasserism
* Swedish
* Neo
* Finnish
* NRx
* Pan-Turkic
* Rexism
* Polish
* Romanian
* Legionarism
* Neo-Legionarism
* Romanianism/Stelism
* Russian
* Neo-Eurasianism
* Syndicalist
* Syrian Social Nationalism
* Techno
* Third Positionism
* National-anarchism
* National Bolshevism
* Nazi-Maoism
* Uruguayan
* Marzism
* Revisionism
* Sosism
* Ustašism

Movements

| Africa|

* Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging
* Coalition for the Defence of the Republic
* Greyshirts
* Muslim Association of the Lictor
* National Revolutionary Movement for Development
* Ossewabrandwag
* Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines
* Republican Democratic Movement
* Young Egypt Party (1933)

|

Asia|

* Abhinav Bharat
* Al-Muthanna Club
* Aria Party
* Azerbaijan National Democrat Party
* Azure Party
* Black Dragon Society
* Brit HaBirionim
* Concordia Association
* Grey Wolves
* Golden Square
* Hindu Mahasabha
* Iran-e-No Party
* Jewish National Front
* Kach
* Kataeb Party
* Kenkokukai
* Kokumin Dōmei
* Korea Nationalist Party
* Korean National Youth Association
* Lehi
* Liberal Party (South Korea)
* Nasyonal Aktivite ve Zinde İnkişaf
* National Socialism Association
* National Socialist Japanese Workers' Party
* Nationalist Movement Party
* Nationalist Task Party
* National Will Party
* Nation Party of Iran
* Otzma Yehudit
* Pan-Iranist Party
* Palestine Arab Party
* Patrol 36
* Progress Party (Iran)
* Philippine Falange
* Rastakhiz Party
* Rastriya Prajatantra Party
* Reform bureaucrats
* Religious Zionist Party
* Sakurakai
* Sangh Parivar
* Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad
* Bharatiya Gau Raksha Dal
* Bharatiya Janata Party
* Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha
* Bharatiya Jana Sangh
* Bharatiya Kisan Sangh
* Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh
* Bharat Vikas Parishad
* Ekal Vidyalaya
* Hindu Makkal Katchi
* Hindu Munnani
* Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh
* Jammu Praja Parishad
* Muslim Rashtriya Manch
* Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas
* Rashtra Sevika Samiti
* Rashtriya Sikh Sangat
* Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
* Akhil Bharatiya Itihas Sankalan Yojana
* Seva Bharati
* Vidya Bharati
* Vanavasi Kalyan Ashram
* Vishva Hindu Parishad
* Bajrang Dal
* Durga Vahini
* SUMKA
* Syrian Social Nationalist Party
* Tōhōkai
* Tsagaan Khas
* Turkish Union Party
* Wang Jingwei Kuomintang

Northern / Northwestern Europe|

* Academic Karelia Society
* Ailtirí na hAiséirghe
* Autonome Nationalisten
* Bases Autónomas
* Black Front (Netherlands)
* Blood & Honour
* Blueshirts
* Breton Social-National Workers' Movement
* British Democratic Party
* British Fascists
* Britain First
* British League of Ex-Servicemen and Women
* British Movement
* British National Party (1960)
* British National Party
* British People's Party (1939)
* British People's Party (2005)
* British Union of Fascists
* The Britons
* La Cagoule
* Casuals United
* Centre Party '86
* Clerical People's Party
* Dutch Defence League
* Dutch Fascist Union
* English Defence League
* European Defence League
* English National Association
* European Liberation Front
* Le Faisceau
* Fédération d'action nationale et européenne
* Finnish National Socialist Labor Organisation
* Finnish People's Organisation
* Finnish-Socialist Workers' Party
* Flemish National Union
* French National-Collectivist Party
* French Nationalist Party
* French Popular Party
* General Dutch Fascist League
* Greater Britain Movement
* Groupe Collaboration
* Heathen Front
* Imperial Fascist League
* International Third Position
* Jeune Nation
* Lalli Alliance of Finland
* Lapua Movement
* League of Saint George
* Les Identitaires
* Mouvement d'Action Civique
* Mouvement Franciste
* Nasjonal Samling
* National Action (UK)
* National Alliance (Sweden)
* National Corporate Party
* National Fascisti
* National Front (UK)
* National League of Sweden
* Nationalist Party
* National Popular Rally
* National Rally
* National Socialist Bloc
* National Socialist Dutch Workers Party
* National Socialist Front
* National Socialist League
* National Socialist Movement (UK, 1962)
* National Socialist Movement (United Kingdom)
* National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands
* National Socialist Movement of Norway
* National Socialist Union of Finland
* National Socialist Workers' Party (Sweden)
* National Socialist Workers' Party of Denmark
* National Socialists of Finland
* National Syndicalists
* National Union (Netherlands)
* National Union (Portugal)
* New Party
* Nipsters
* Nordic League
* The Nordic Realm Party
* Nordic Resistance Movement
* Northern League
* Norwegian Defence League
* Nouvelle Droite
* GRECE
* L'Œuvre Française
* Official National Front
* Order of Flemish Militants
* Order of Nine Angles
* Organisation of National Socialists
* Parti Communautaire National-Européen
* Party of Finnish Labor
* Party of the Swedes
* Patriotic Alternative
* Patriotic People's Movement
* Patriotic People's Movement (1993)
* Pērkonkrusts
* Phalange Française
* Ragnarock
* Rebelles Européens
* Rexist Party
* Rising Finland
* Scottish Democratic Fascist Party
* Scottish Protestant League
* Skrewdriver
* Skullhead
* Stormers
* Terre et Peuple
* Third Way (France)
* Third Way (UK)
* Union Movement
* Verdinaso
* Vigrid
* White Aryan Resistance
* World Union of National Socialists

Central Europe|

* Action Front of National Socialists/National Activists
* Arrow Cross Party
* Artgemeinschaft
* Austrian Nazism
* Black Front (Germany)
* Bund Deutscher Osten
* Christian National Socialist Front
* Deutsche Reichspartei
* Eidgenössische Sammlung
* Falanga
* Free German Workers' Party
* German Faith Movement
* German National Movement in Liechtenstein
* German National Socialist Workers' Party (Czechoslovakia)
* German Party (Slovakia)
* German Social Union
* Honor
* Hungarian National Front
* Hungarian National Socialist Agricultural Labourers' and Workers' Party
* Hungarian National Socialist Party
* Combat League of German Socialists
* Kotlebists – People's Party Our Slovakia
* Landser
* Liechtenstein Homeland Service
* National Democratic Party (Austria)
* National Democratic Party of Germany
* National Fascist Community
* National Front (Hungary)
* National Front (Switzerland)
* National Movement of Switzerland
* National Radical Camp
* National Radical Camp (1993)
* National Revival of Poland
* National Union (Switzerland)
* Nationalist Front (Germany)
* Nazi Party
* Greater German People's Community
* Nazi Germany
* National Socialist Freedom Movement
* National Socialist Working Association
* New Order
* Nipsters
* No Colours Records
* PC Records
* Positive Christianity
* German Christians
* Republic Movement
* The Right (Germany)
* Rock-O-Rama Records
* Shield and Sword
* Slovak People's Party
* Socialist Reich Party
* Stahlgewitter
* Sudeten German Party
* The Third Path
* United Hungarian National Socialist Party
* Vlajka
* Volksdeutsche Bewegung
* Volkssozialistische Bewegung Deutschlands/Partei der Arbeit
* Wiking-Jugend

Southern Europe|

* ADÑ–Spanish Identity
* Albanian Fascist Party
* Balli Kombëtar
* Brothers of Italy
* CEDADE
* Democratic Fascist Party
* European Nation State
* Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria
* Fasci Italiani di Combattimento
* Fascio d'Azione Rivoluzionaria
* Falange
* Sección Femenina
* La Falange (1999)
* Falange Auténtica
* Falange Española
* Falange Española Auténtica
* Falange Española de las JONS
* Falange Española de las JONS (1976)
* Falange Española Independiente
* Falangist Movement of Spain
* Freethinkers' Party
* Imperium Europa
* Italian fascism
* National Fascist Party (Italy)
* Italian Social Republic
* Republican Fascist Party
* Italian Social Movement
* Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalista
* Juntas Españolas
* National Alliance (Spain)
* National Alliance July 18
* National Democracy (Italy)
* National Democracy (Spain)
* National Front (Spain, 1986)
* National Front (Spain, 2006)
* National Union (Italy, 1923)
* National Union (Spain)
* New Force (Italy)
* New Force (Spain)
* Republican Social Movement
* The Right (Italy)
* Sammarinese Fascist Party
* Spanish Military Union
* Struggle of the People
* Student Action
* Terza Posizione
* Tricolour Flame
* Unidad Falangista Montañesa
* Youth Front

Eastern and Southeastern Europe|

* Autochthonous Croatian Party of Rights
* Bosnian Movement of National Pride
* Bulgarian National Socialist Workers Party
* Croatian Liberation Movement
* Croatian National Resistance
* Croatian Party of Rights
* Crusade of Romanianism
* Ethnic National Union
* Eurasia Movement
* Eurasia Party
* Format18
* For the Native Language!
* Front of National Revolutionary Action
* German Party
* German People's Party
* Golden Dawn
* Greek National Socialist Party
* Hosank
* Iron Guard
* Kolovrat
* LEPEN
* Liberal Democratic Party of Russia
* Lithuanian Nationalist Union
* National Agrarian Party
* National Bolshevik Front
* National Bolshevik Party
* National-Christian Defense League
* National Christian Party
* National Fascist Movement
* National Italo-Romanian Cultural and Economic Movement
* National Party – Greeks
* National Socialist Patriotic Organisation
* National Socialist Society
* National Social Movement
* National Romanian Fascio
* National Renaissance Front
* National Salvation Front
* Nokturnal Mortum
* National Socialism / White Power
* Obraz
* Occupy Pedophilia
* Order of Nine Angles
* Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists
* The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov
* Pamyat
* Patriotic Alliance
* People's Party
* Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine
* Ratniks (Bulgaria)
* Romanian Front
* Russian Imperial Movement
* Russian Fascist Party
* Russian National Unity
* Russian Women's Fascist Movement
* Serbian Action
* Serbian Radical Party
* Steel Shield
* Svoboda
* Union of Bulgarian National Legions
* Ustaše
* Ustaše in Australia
* Croatian Revolutionary Brotherhood
* Yugoslav Radical Union
* ZBOR

North America|

* Fascism in Canada
* Aryan Guard
* Aryan Nations
* Canadian Association for Free Expression
* Canadian Union of Fascists
* Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform
* Heritage Front
* Parti national social chrétien
* Fascism in the United States
* American Front
* American Nazi Party
* Betar US
* Creativity
* Fascist League of North America
* German American Bund
* Goyim Defense League
* Hammerskins
* Identity Evropa
* League of the South
* National Alliance (United States)
* National Renaissance Party
* Nationalist Social Club-131
* National Socialist Legion
* National Socialist Liberation Front
* National Socialist Movement
* National States' Rights Party
* National Vanguard
* Nationalist Front (United States)
* Patriot Front
* Proud Boys
* Rise Above Movement
* Silver Legion of America
* Christian Party (United States, 1930s)
* Traditionalist Worker Party
* Vanguard America
* Volksfront
* White Aryan Resistance
* Wotansvolk
* Revolutionary Mexicanist Action
* Mexican Democratic Party
* Mexican Fascist Party
* National Pro Patria Party
* National Synarchist Union
* Nationalist Front of Mexico
* Order of Nine Angles

Oceania|

* Action Zealandia
* Antipodean Resistance
* Australia First Movement
* Australia First Party
* Australian Defence League
* Australian National Socialist Party
* Centre Party
* Lads Society
* National Action (Australia)
* National Socialist Network
* National Socialist Party of Australia
* Progressive Nationalist Party
* Reclaim Australia
* True Blue Crew
* United Patriots Front

South America|

* Agrarian Labor Party
* Argentine Anticommunist Alliance
* Argentine Fascist Party
* Argentine Nationalist Action
* Argentine Patriotic League
* Bolivian Socialist Falange
* Brazilian Integralism
* Brazilian Integralist Action
* Brazilian Integralist Front
* Falangism in Latin America
* Female Peronist Party
* Iron Guard (Argentina)
* Nacionalismo
* National Fascist Party (Argentina)
* National Fascist Union
* Nationalist Liberation Alliance
* National Liberation Movement
* National Socialist Movement of Chile
* National Universitary Concentration
* New Triumph Party
* Patriot Front (Argentina)
* Popular Dignity
* Popular Freedom Alliance
* Popular Representation Party
* Popular Socialist Vanguard
* Republican League
* La Resistencia Dios, Patria y Familia
* Revolutionary Union
* Tacuara Nationalist Movement

People

| Australia|

* Campbell (Eric)
* Campbell (Graeme)
* Cottrell
* Groot
* Mills
* Saleam

|

Austria|

* Dollfuss
* Miklas
* Pfrimer
* Planetta
* Schuschnigg
* Seyss-Inquart
* Starhemberg

Belgium|

* Daye
* Declercq
* Degrelle
* Denis
* Elias
* Eriksson
* Hermans
* Lagrou
* Poulet
* Severen
* Streel
* van de Wiele

Croatia|

* Boban
* Francetić
* Kraljević
* Kvaternik
* Luburić
* Pavelić
* Pavičić
* Rover
* Servatzy

Finland|

* Helanen
* Isotalo
* Kalsta
* Konkka
* Kosola
* Orko
* Simojoki
* Somersalo
* Törni
* Varjonen

France|

* Augier
* Bardèche
* Benoist-Méchin
* Béraud
* Brasillach
* Bucard
* Châteaubriant
* Déat
* Déroulède
* Dior
* Doriot
* La Rochelle
* Lagardelle
* Laval
* Pétain
* Rebatet
* Valois
* Vial

Germany|

* Abetz
* Andrae
* Baeumler
* Berchtold
* Berger
* Best
* Brunner
* Bühler
* Darré
* Falkenhausen
* Hocke
* Feder
* Forster
* Frank
* Franz V
* Gesche
* Goebbels
* Göring
* Graf
* Greiser
* Günther
* Hanke
* Heiden
* Hess
* Heydrich
* Himmler
* Hitler
* Klintzsch
* Kuhn
* Ludendorff
* Maurice
* Müller
* Niekisch
* Ploetz
* Rahn
* Reitsch
* Renthe-Fink
* Ribbentrop
* Rieger
* Rosenberg
* Schmitt
* Schreck
* Skorzeny
* Strasser (Gregor)
* Strasser (Otto)
* Streicher
* Terboven
* Thadden
* Krosigk
* Zündel

Greece|

* Dragoumis
* Kasidiaris
* Koryzis
* Lagos
* Michaloliakos
* Papadopoulos

India|

* Adityanath
* Advani
* Bose
* Godse
* Golwalkar
* Hedgewar
* Modi
* Mukherjee
* Savarkar
* Thakur
* Vajpayee

Iran|

* Forouhar
* Kashani
* Monshizadeh
* Pezeshkpour
* Teymourtash

Israel|

* Ahimeir
* Ben-Ari
* Ben-Gvir
* Eldad
* Eliyahu
* Goldstein
* Gopstein
* Greenberg
* Ha'ivri
* Heruti
* Kahane
* Marzel
* Natan-Zada
* Stern
* Yeivin

Italy|

* Acerbo
* Alfieri
* Ambris
* D'Annunzio
* Azara
* Badoglio
* Balbo
* Torrente Ballester
* Bastianini
* Bianchi
* Boni
* Bono
* Boselli
* Bottai
* Ciano (Costanzo)
* Ciano (Galeazzo)
* Cogni
* Corradini
* Freda
* Gentile
* Giuriati
* Gozi
* Grandi
* Graziani
* Guidi
* Malaparte
* Marinetti
* Michels
* Morgagni
* Mussolini
* Olivetti
* Panunzio
* Papini
* Pavolini
* Rauti
* Ricci
* Ridruejo
* Rocco
* Rossoni
* Sarfatti
* Soffici
* Spirito
* Volpi

Japan|

* Akao
* Araki
* Chō
* Hashimoto
* Honjō
* Kita
* Kodama
* Matsuoka
* Nonaka
* Ōkawa
* Sasakawa

Romania|

* Antonescu
* Bacaloglu
* Codreanu
* Crainic
* Cuza
* Gigurtu
* Goga
* Manoilescu
* Moța
* Ogoranu
* Sima

Russia|

* Astroŭski
* Borovikov
* Ilyin
* Kaminski
* Martsinkevich
* Milchakov
* Oktan
* Prilepin
* Prokhanov
* Rodzaevsky

Spain|

* Arrese
* Bau Nolla
* Bilbao Eguía
* Carrero Blanco
* Fernández-Cuesta
* Franco
* Franco y Polo
* Giménez Caballero
* Primo de Rivera
* Ramos
* Sánchez Mazas
* Serrano Suñer

Ukraine|

* Bandera
* Biletsky
* Dontsov
* Gubarev
* Klyachkivsky
* Lebed
* Rebet
* Samchuk
* Shukhevych
* Stetsko
* Tyahnybok
* Vitrenko

United Kingdom|

* Beckett
* Chamberlain
* Chesterton
* Lake
* Leese
* Mosley (Diana)
* Mosley (Oswald)
* Pankhurst
* Pearson
* Ramsay
* Robinson
* Southgate
* Tyndall
* Wellesley

United States|

* Auernheimer
* Collins
* Fuentes
* Joyce
* Pelley
* Pound
* Yockey

Other|

* Burdi
* Celmiņš
* Martínez
* Quisling
* Ramírez
* Riva-Agüero y Osma
* Šešelj
* Szálasi

Works

| Literature|

* 1776 Returns
* La Conquista del Estado
* The Culture of Critique
* Defiance
* Did Six Million Really Die?
* The Doctrine of Fascism
* Essentials of Hindutva
* Fascist Manifesto
* For My Legionaries
* The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia
* The Fourth Political Theory
* Hitlers Zweites Buch
* Hutu Ten Commandments
* Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics
* An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus
* Kokutairon and Pure Socialism
* The Last Will of a Russian Fascist
* Manifesto of Race
* Manifesto of the Fascist Intellectuals
* Mein Kampf
* My Autobiography
* My Life
* The Myth of the Twentieth Century
* OPROP!
* Our Race Will Rule Undisputed Over The World
* Protestantische Rompilger
* A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century
* Uncomfortable Questions for Comfortable Jews
* A Warning to the Hindus
* Who Are the Mind Benders?

|

Periodicals|

* Action
* Ajan Suunta
* L'Alba
* El Alcázar
* The American Review
* Der Angriff
* Arriba
* The Blackshirt
* La Conquista del Estado
* The Daily Stormer
* Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung
* Das Deutsche Mädel
* La Difesa della Razza
* Eleftheros Kosmos
* The European
* Fashist
* Fashizmi
* La France au travail
* Fritt Folk
* Fronten
* Gândirea
* Gioventù Fascista
* Golden Dawn
* Hamaas
* Hrvatski Domobran
* Je suis partout
* Kangura
* Kansallissosialisti
* Limonka
* Masada2000
* Münchener Beobachter
* Nash Put'
* Nástup
* Nation Europa
* Neue Anthropologie
* Neues Volk
* Het Nieuwe Volk
* Norsk-Tysk Tidsskrift
* Novopress
* Norsk-Tysk Tidsskrift
* Organiser
* Panchjanya
* Panzerbär
* Parole der Woche
* Le Pays Réel
* Der Pimpf
* Il Popolo d'Italia
* Das Reich
* Revue d'histoire du fascisme
* Das Schwarze Korps
* Sfarmă-Piatră
* Signal
* Siniristi
* Spearhead
* Der Stürmer
* Türkische Post
* Der Umbruch
* Vairas
* Vlajka
* Volk en Staat
* Völkischer Beobachter
* Die Wehrmacht
* Wochenspruch der NSDAP

Film|

* L'Armata Azzurra
* Bengasi
* Condottieri
* The Daughter of the Samurai
* Erbkrank
* Europa: The Last Battle
* The Great Appeal
* The Old Guard
* Raza
* Scipio Africanus: The Defeat of Hannibal
* Der Sieg des Glaubens
* The Siege of the Alcazar
* Lo squadrone bianco
* Tag der Freiheit: Unsere Wehrmacht
* Triumph of the Will

Music|

* Fashwave
* Hindutva pop
* National Socialist black metal
* Nazi punk
* Rock Against Communism
* White power music

Other|

* Allach
* StoneToss

Related topics|

* Art of the Third Reich
* Fascist architecture
* Heroic realism
* Nazi architecture
* Nazism and cinema

Organizations

| Institutional|

* Ahnenerbe
* Chamber of Fasces and Corporations
* Grand Council of Fascism
* Imperial Way Faction
* Italian Nationalist Association
* National Socialist League of the Reich for Physical Exercise
* Quadrumvirs

|

Activist|

* Adelaide Institute
* Agrarian Trade Union Federation
* The Britons
* Casuals United
* DeVlag
* European Social Movement
* Finnish Realm Union
* Francisco Franco National Foundation
* Friends of New Germany
* German American Bund
* GRECE
* The Link
* Mladorossi
* National Party of Europe
* National Policy Institute
* National Popular Consciousness
* Panzerfaust Records
* Popular Force Party
* Right Club
* Russian Fascist Organization

Youth|

* Adler und Falke
* Albanian Lictor Youth
* Arab Lictor Youth
* Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha
* Blue-and-Blacks
* Ethiopian Lictor Youth
* Fascist Union of Youth
* Frente de Juventudes
* Al-Futuwwa
* Gioventù Italiana del Littorio
* Great Japan Youth Party
* Hitler Youth
* Faith and Beauty Society
* Deutsches Jungvolk
* Jungmädelbund
* League of German Girls
* Jeunesse Populaire Française
* Juventudes de Acción Popular
* Korean National Youth Association
* Levente
* Mocidade Portuguesa
* Nationale Jeugdstorm
* National League of Sweden
* National Socialist Liberation Front
* National Youth (Sweden)
* National Youth (Italy)
* National Youth Alliance
* National Youth Organisation (Greece)
* Opera Nazionale Balilla
* Österreichisches Jungvolk
* Patriotic/Eureka Youth League
* Union of Fascist Little Ones
* Union of Young Fascists – Vanguard (boys)
* Union of Young Fascists – Vanguard (girls)
* Ustaše Youth
* Wiking-Jugend
* Youth Front

Paramilitary and terrorist|

* Abhinav Bharat
* Albanian Fascist Militia
* Atomwaffen Division
* Azov Brigade
* Bajrang Dal
* Black Brigades
* Black Legion
* Blackshirts
* Blueshirts (Canada)
* Blueshirts (Ireland)
* Column 88
* Combat Terrorist Organization
* Confederation of the Nation
* Corpul Muncitoresc Legionar
* Croatian Defence Forces
* Croatian National Resistance
* Croatian Revolutionary Brotherhood
* Bugojno group
* Einsatzgruppen
* Fasci di Azione Rivoluzionaria
* Falange Armata
* Falange Militia
* Flemish Guard
* Flemish Legion
* Frontbann
* Goldshirts
* Greenshirts
* Hilfspolizei
* Hitler Youth
* Greyshirts
* Heimwehr
* Hirden
* Hlinka Guard
* Hungarian National Defence Association
* Impuzamugambi
* Interbrigades
* Interahamwe
* Iron Wolf
* Jewish Defense League
* Jewish Defense Organization
* Kataeb Regulatory Forces
* Lăncieri
* Legion Wasa
* Lehava
* Lehi
* Levente
* Makapili
* Mano Blanca
* Misanthropic Division
* National Republican Guard
* New Guard
* Ostmärkische Sturmscharen
* Rodobrana
* Russian Imperial Movement
* Russian National Unity (2000)
* S14
* Schutzstaffel
* Serbian Volunteer Corps
* Sicarii
* Sich Battalion
* Silver Shirts
* Sturmabteilung
* Sudetendeutsches Freikorps
* Terror Against Terror
* Third Klan
* Ukrainian Insurgent Army
* Ukrainian People's Militsiya
* Ustaše Militia
* Volkssport
* Walloon Guard
* Walloon Legion
* Waffen-SS
* Wagner Group
* Rusich Group
* Weerbaarheidsafdeling
* Werwolf
* Westland New Post
* Yokusan Sonendan
* Youth Front

Student|

* Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad
* Avanguardia Giovanile Fascista
* Frente de Estudiantes Sindicalistas
* German Student Union
* National Socialist German Students' League
* Sindicato Español Universitario
* Student Action

International|

* Axis powers
* NSDAP/AO
* ODESSA

History

| 1900s|

* Herero and Nama genocide and the Holocaust

|

1910s|

* Arditi
* Fascio
* Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria
* Armenian genocide and the Holocaust

1920s|

* March on Rome
* Corfu incident
* Acerbo Law
* Beer Hall Putsch
* Aventine Secession
* Italian economic battles
* Le Faisceau
* 28 May 1926 coup d'état
* Libyan genocide

1930s|

* March of the Iron Will
* November 1932 German federal election
* March 1933 German federal election
* Enabling Act
* Austrian Civil War
* July Putsch
* 1934 Montreux Fascist conference
* Romani Holocaust
* 4th of August Regime
* Anti-Comintern Pact
* Spanish Civil War

1940s|

* World War II
* Nazi crimes against the Polish nation
* The Holocaust
* Genocide of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia
* End in Italy
* Nuremberg Trials
* Tokyo Trials

Lists

* Anti-fascists
* Books about Hitler
* British fascist parties
* Fascist movements by country (A-F
* G-M
* N-T
* U-Z)
* Nazi ideologues
* Nazi leaders
* Secretaries of Italian fascist parties
* Speeches by Hitler
* SS personnel

Related topics

* Authoritarian conservatism
* Chiangism
* Francoism
* Khomeinism
* Maurrassisme
* Pinochetism
* Putinism
* Ziaism
* Alt-right
* Alt-lite
* Alt-right pipeline
* Alt-tech
* Identitarian movement
* Anti-fascism
* Bahutu Manifesto
* Berlusconism
* Conservative Revolution
* Criticism of fascism
* Europe a Nation
* Fascist (epithet)
* Fascist mysticism
* Feudal fascism
* F-scale (personality test)
* Garveyism
* Germanisation
* of Poles during the Partitions
* Italianization
* of South Tyrol
* Japanization
* Morenazi
* Neosocialism
* Para-/semi-fascism
* Post-fascism
* Proto-fascism
* Red fascism
* Red–green–brown alliance
* Roman salute
* Saffronisation
* Sansepolcrismo
* Scientific racism
* Aryanism
* Nordicism
* Social fascism
* Sorelianism
* Synarchism
* Szeged Idea
* Trumpism
* Donald Trump and fascism
* Völkisch movement
* Women in Nazi Germany

* Category

* v
* t
* e

Political ideologies

* The Establishment
* Anti
* Hardline
* Moderate
* Political spectrum
* Far-left
* Left-wing
* Centre-left
* Centrism
* Centre-right
* Right-wing
* Far-right
* Radical
* Reactionary
* Revolutionary

* Accelerationism
* Agrarianism
* Anarchism
* Capitalism
* Christian democracy
* Communalism
* Communism
* Bolshevism
* Marxism-Leninism
* National Bolshevism
* Communitarianism
* Confucianism
* Conservatism
* Constitutionalism
* Corporatism
* Distributism
* Social credit
* Environmentalism
* Familialism
* Fascism
* Nazism
* Third Position
* Feminism
* Fundamentalism
* Green
* Hindutva
* Islamism
* Liberalism
* Libertarianism
* Marxism
* Monarchism
* Royalism
* Nationalism
* Republicanism
* Classical
* Modern
* Social democracy
* Socialism
* Third Way
* Zionism

See also|

* Authoritarianism
* Anti
* Collectivism
* Colonialism
* Culturalism
* Inter
* Mono
* Multi
* Extremism
* Federalism
* Confederalism
* Confederatism
* Globalism
* Ideological repression
* Imperialism
* Individualism
* Internationalism
* Localism
* Masculism
* Militarism
* Nihilism
* Pacifism
* Pluralism
* Populism
* Progressivism
* Reformism
* Regionalism
* Separatism
* Statism
* Syncretism
* Totalitarianism

* v
* t
* e

Forms of government

* Anarchism
* Authoritarianism
* Autocracy
* Dictatorship
* Direct democracy
* Oligarchy
* Monarchy
* Republic
* Plutocracy
* Theocracy
* Totalitarianism

* v
* t
* e

Political philosophy

Terms|

* Authority
* Citizenship‎
* Duty
* Elite
* Emancipation
* Freedom
* Government
* Hegemony
* Hierarchy
* Justice
* Law
* Legitimacy
* Liberty
* Monopoly
* Nation
* Obedience
* Peace
* People
* Pluralism
* Power
* Progress
* Propaganda
* Property
* Regime
* Revolution
* Rights
* Ruling class
* Society
* Sovereignty‎
* State
* Utopia
* War

Government|

* Aristocracy
* Oligarchy
* Autocracy
* Bureaucracy
* Dictatorship
* Democracy
* Ochlocracy
* Gerontocracy
* Meritocracy
* Monarchy
* Tyranny
* Plutocracy
* Technocracy
* Theocracy

Ideologies|

* Agrarianism
* Anarchism
* Capitalism
* Christian democracy
* Colonialism
* Communism
* Communitarianism
* Confucianism
* Conservatism
* Corporatism
* Distributism
* Environmentalism
* Fascism
* Feminism
* Feudalism
* Imperialism
* Islamism
* Liberalism
* Libertarianism
* Localism
* Marxism
* Monarchism
* Multiculturalism
* Nationalism
* Nazism
* Populism
* Republicanism
* Social Darwinism
* Social democracy
* Socialism
* Third Way

Concepts|

* Balance of power
* Bellum omnium contra omnes
* Body politic
* Clash of civilizations
* Common good
* Consent of the governed
* Divine right of kings
* Family as a model for the state
* Monopoly on violence
* Natural law
* Negative and positive rights
* Night-watchman state
* Noble lie
* Noblesse oblige
* Open society
* Ordered liberty
* Original position
* Overton window
* Separation of powers
* Social contract
* State of nature
* Statolatry
* Supermajority
* Tyranny of the majority

Philosophers|

| Antiquity|

* Aristotle
* Chanakya
* Cicero
* Confucius
* Han Fei
* Lactantius
* Mencius
* Mozi
* Plato
* political philosophy
* Polybius
* Shang
* Sun Tzu
* Thucydides
* Xenophon

|

Middle Ages|

* Al-Farabi
* Aquinas
* Averroes
* Bruni
* Dante
* Gelasius
* al-Ghazali
* Ibn Khaldun
* Marsilius
* Muhammad
* Nizam al-Mulk
* Ockham
* Plethon
* Wang

Early modern
period|

* Boétie
* Bodin
* Bossuet
* Calvin
* Campanella
* Filmer
* Grotius
* Guicciardini
* Hobbes
* political philosophy
* James
* Leibniz
* Locke
* Luther
* Machiavelli
* Milton
* More
* Müntzer
* Pufendorf
* Spinoza
* Suárez

18th and 19th
centuries|

* Bakunin
* Bastiat
* Beccaria
* Bentham
* Bolingbroke
* Bonald
* Burke
* Carlyle
* Comte
* Condorcet
* Constant
* Cortés
* Engels
* Fichte
* Fourier
* Franklin
* Godwin
* Haller
* Hegel
* Herder
* Hume
* Iqbal
* Jefferson
* Kant
* political philosophy
* Le Bon
* Le Play
* Madison
* Maistre
* Marx
* Mazzini
* Mill
* Montesquieu
* Nietzsche
* Owen
* Paine
* Renan
* Rousseau
* Sade
* Saint-Simon
* Smith
* Spencer
* de Staël
* Stirner
* Taine
* Thoreau
* Tocqueville
* Tucker
* Voltaire

20th and 21st
centuries|

* Agamben
* Ambedkar
* Arendt
* Aron
* Badiou
* Bauman
* Benoist
* Berlin
* Bernstein
* Burnham
* Chomsky
* Dmowski
* Du Bois
* Dugin
* Dworkin
* Evola
* Foucault
* Fromm
* Fukuyama
* Gandhi
* Gentile
* Gramsci
* Guénon
* Habermas
* Hayek
* Hoppe
* Huntington
* Kautsky
* Khomeini
* Kirk
* Kropotkin
* Laclau
* Lenin
* Luxemburg
* Mansfield
* Mao
* Marcuse
* Maurras
* Michels
* Mises
* Mosca
* Mouffe
* Negri
* Nozick
* Nussbaum
* Oakeshott
* Ortega
* Pareto
* Popper
* Qutb
* Rand
* Rawls
* Röpke
* Rothbard
* Russell
* Sartre
* Schmitt
* Scruton
* Shariati
* Sorel
* Spann
* Spengler
* Strauss
* Sun
* Taylor
* Voegelin
* Walzer
* Weber

Works|

* Republic (c. 375 BC)
* Politics (c. 350 BC)
* On the Republic (51 BC)
* Treatise on Law (c. 1274)
* Monarchy (1313)
* The Prince (1532)
* Leviathan (1651)
* Two Treatises of Government (1689)
* The Spirit of Law (1748)
* The Social Contract (1762)
* Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
* Rights of Man (1791)
* Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)
* Democracy in America (1835–1840)
* The Communist Manifesto (1848)
* On Liberty (1859)
* The Revolt of the Masses (1929)
* The Road to Serfdom (1944)
* The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)
* The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951)
* A Theory of Justice (1971)
* The End of History and the Last Man (1992)

Related|

* Authoritarianism
* Collectivism and individualism
* Conflict theories
* Contractualism
* Critique of political economy
* Egalitarianism
* Elite theory
* Elitism
* History of political thought
* Institutional discrimination
* Jurisprudence
* Justification for the state
* Political ethics
* Political spectrum
* Left-wing politics
* Centrism
* Right-wing politics
* Political theology
* Political violence
* Separation of church and state
* Separatism
* Social justice
* Statism
* Totalitarianism

* Category:Political philosophy

* v
* t
* e

Conformity

Enforcement|

| Proscription|

* Damnatio memoriae
* Dissident / Dissenter
* Exile
* Émigré
* Homo sacer
* Ostracism
* Blacklisting
* Cancel culture
* Censorship
* Deplatforming
* Outcast
* Outlaw
* Civil death
* Vogelfrei
* Persona non grata
* Public enemy
* Enemy of the people
* Enemy of the state
* Scapegoating
* Shunning

|

Governmental pressure|

* Authoritarianism
* Harmonisation of law
* Nationalism
* Left-wing nationalism
* National conservatism
* Totalitarianism
* Tyranny of the majority

Group pressure|

* Bandwagon effect
* Brainwashing
* Closure (sociology)
* Collectivism
* Consensus reality
* Culture shock
* Dogma
* Echo chamber
* False consensus effect
* Fear of missing out
* Groupthink
* Hazing
* Herd mentality
* Identification (psychology)
* Indoctrination
* Invented tradition
* Memory conformity
* Mere-exposure effect
* Milieu control
* Mobbing
* Normalization
* Normative social influence
* Passing (sociology)
* Patriotism
* Peer pressure
* Pluralistic ignorance
* Propaganda
* Psychosocial issue
* Purity spiral
* Operant conditioning
* Rally 'round the flag effect
* Social construction of gender
* Social contagion
* Addiction
* Behavioral
* Crime
* Hysterical
* Suicide
* Emotional
* Social influence
* Social integration
* Socialization
* Spiral of silence
* Teasing
* Toxic positivity
* Untouchability

Individual pressure|

* Authoritarian personality
* Authoritarian leadership style
* Right-wing authoritarianism
* Control freak
* Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder

Conformity|

* Compliance
* Communal reinforcement
* Countersignaling
* Creeping normality
* Herd behavior
* Internalization
* Normalization of deviance
* Obedience
* Preference falsification
* Social proof
* Social reality

Experiments|

* Asch conformity experiments
* Breaching experiment
* Milgram experiment
* Stanford prison experiment

Anticonformity|

* Alternative media
* Anti-authoritarianism
* Anti-social behaviour
* Self-segregation
* Civil disobedience
* Cosmopolitanism
* Counterculture
* Culture jamming
* Deviance
* Devil's advocate
* Dissent / Defection
* Political
* Eccentricity
* Eclecticism
* Hermit
* Idiosyncrasy
* Individualism
* Insubordination
* Pueblo clown
* Rebellion
* Red team
* Satire
* Shock value

Authority control databases

National|

* Germany
* United States
* Latvia
* Poland
* Israel

Other|

* Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine
* Yale LUX

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template