Battle of New Orleans

Last battle of the War of 1812

This article is about the battle fought in 1815. For other uses, see Battle of New Orleans (disambiguation).

Battle of New Orleans

Part of the War of 1812

The battle as painted by Jean Hyacinthe de Laclotte, a member of the Louisiana Militia, based on his sketches made at the scene
| Date| January 8, 1815 (1815-01-08)[1]

|

Location|

Near New Orleans, Louisiana

29°56′33″N 89°59′27″W﻿ / ﻿29.94250°N 89.99083°W﻿ / 29.94250; -89.99083
Result|

* American victory

* British amphibious assault repelled[2]

Belligerents
United States|   United Kingdom
Commanders and leaders

* Andrew Jackson
* Daniel Patterson
* Pushmataha[3]
* Jean Lafitte

* Edward Pakenham †
* Samuel Gibbs (DOW)
* John Keane (WIA)
* Robert Rennie †

Strength
c. 5,700[4]|  c. 8,000<[4][note 1]
Casualties and losses

* 13 dead
* 39 wounded
* 19 missing or captured[note 2]
* Total: 71

* 291 dead
* 1,262 wounded
* 484 missing or captured[7]
* Total: 2,037[7]

Chalmette Battlefield

class=notpageimage|

Location in Louisiana

* v
* t
* e

Gulf theater
1813–1815

Prelude

* Tecumseh
* Creeks

1813

* Fort Charlotte

1814

* 1st Fort Bowyer
* Pensacola
* Lake Borgne
* Villeré Plantation

1815

* New Orleans
* Fort St. Philip
* 2nd Fort Bowyer

* v
* t
* e

Naval battles of the War of 1812

Atlantic Ocean

* USS Essex vs HMS Alert
* USS Constitution vs HMS Guerriere
* Capture of HMS Frolic
* USS United States vs HMS Macedonian
* USS Constitution vs HMS Java
* Sinking of HMS Peacock
* Rappahannock River
* Capture of USS Chesapeake
* Capture of the Young Teazer
* Capture of HMS Dominica
* Capture of USS Argus
* Capture of HMS Boxer
* Capture of USS Frolic
* Capture of HMS Epervier
* Sinking of HMS Reindeer
* Sinking of HMS Avon
* Fayal
* Capture of USS President
* Capture of HMS Cyane and HMS Levant
* Capture of HMS Penguin
* Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus

* * *

East Coast

* Lewes
* Long Island
* Alexandria
* Baltimore
* Hampden
* Fort Peter

* * *

Great Lakes / Saint Lawrence River

* Lake Ontario
* 1st Sacket's Harbor
* Capture of HMS Caledonia and HMS Detroit
* York
* Fort George
* 2nd Sacket's Harbor
* Lake Erie
* Fort Oswego
* Lake Huron
* Lake Champlain

* * *

West Indies / Gulf Coast

* La Guaira
* 1st Fort Bowyer
* Lake Borgne
* Fort St. Philip

* * *

Pacific Ocean

* James Island
* Charles Island
* Nuku Hiva
* Valparaíso

The Battle of New Orleans was fought on January 8, 1815, between the British Army under Major General Sir Edward Pakenham and the United States Army under Brevet Major General Andrew Jackson,[4] roughly 5 miles (8 km) southeast of the French Quarter of New Orleans,[8] in the current suburb of Chalmette, Louisiana.[1][4]

The battle was the climax of the five-month Gulf Campaign (September 1814 to February 1815) by Britain to try to take New Orleans, West Florida, and possibly Louisiana Territory which began at the First Battle of Fort Bowyer. Britain started the New Orleans campaign on December 14, 1814, at the Battle of Lake Borgne and numerous skirmishes and artillery duels happened in the weeks leading up to the final battle.

The battle took place fifteen days after the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, which formally ended the War of 1812, on December 24, 1814, though it would not be ratified by the United States (and therefore did not take effect) until February 16, 1815, as news of the agreement had not yet reached the United States from Europe.[9] Despite a British advantage in numbers, training, and experience, the American forces defeated a poorly executed assault in slightly more than thirty minutes. The Americans suffered 71 casualties, while the British suffered over 2,000, including the deaths of Pakenham and his second-in-command, Major General Samuel Gibbs.

## Background

[edit]

In August 1814, Britain and the United States began negotiations to end the War of 1812.[10] The British Secretary of State for War and the Colonies Henry Bathurst issued Pakenham's secret orders on October 24, 1814, commanding him to continue the war even if he heard rumors of peace. Bathurst expressed concern that the United States might not ratify a treaty and did not want Pakenham either to endanger his forces or miss an opportunity for victory.[11][note 3] Prior to that, in August 1814, Vice Admiral Cochrane had convinced the Admiralty that a campaign against New Orleans would weaken American resolve against Canada and hasten a successful end to the war.[note 4]

There was a major concern that the British and their Spanish allies wanted to reclaim the territories of the Louisiana Purchase because they did not recognize any land deals made by Napoleon (starting with the 1800 Spanish cession of Louisiana to France, followed by the 1804 French sale of Louisiana to the United States). This is why the British invaded New Orleans in the middle of the Treaty of Ghent negotiations. It has been theorized that if the British had won the Battle of New Orleans, they would have likely interpreted that all territories gained from the 1803 Louisiana Purchase would be void and not part of U.S. territory.[14] There was great concern by the Americans that Britain would hold onto the territory indefinitely, but it is left unanswerable due to the outcome of the New Orleans battle. This is contradicted by the content of Bathurst's correspondence,[15][11] and disputed by Latimer,[16] with specific reference to correspondence from the Prime Minister to the Foreign Secretary dated December 23, 1814.[17]

## Opposing forces

[edit]

Main articles: American order of battle at the Battle of New Orleans and British order of battle at the Battle of New Orleans

## Prelude

[edit]

### Lake Borgne

[edit]

Main article: Battle of Lake Borgne

Lake Borgne, Louisiana, 1720.

A fleet of British ships had anchored in the Gulf of Mexico to the east of Lake Pontchartrain and Lake Borgne by December 14, 1814, under the command of Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane.[18][note 5] An American flotilla of five gunboats, commanded by Lieutenant Thomas ap Catesby Jones, blocked British access to the lakes. On December 14, around 980 British sailors and Royal Marines under Captain Nicholas Lockyer[18] set out to attack Jones's force. Lockyer's men sailed in 42 rowboats, almost all armed with a small carronade. Lockyer captured Jones's vessels in a brief engagement. Casualties included 17 British sailors killed and 77 wounded, while 6 Americans were killed, 35 wounded, and the remaining crews captured.[19] The wounded included both Jones and Lockyer.

One unintended consequence is that it is believed the gunboat crews in captivity were able to mislead the British as to Jackson's strength in numbers, when they were questioned.[20] There is a popular story concerning Purser Thomas Shields and Surgeon Robert Morrell, who were sent under a flag of truce to negotiate the return of the prisoners on parole. They were placed in a cabin where their conversation could be heard. Shields, having hearing difficulties, talked loudly and mentioned that 20,000 troops were under Jackson's command. There was nothing in the actions of the British commanders to indicate they believed they were faced with superior numbers.[21]

### Disembarkation by the British

[edit]

Sixteen hundred British soldiers under the command of General John Keane were rowed 60 miles west from Cat Island to Pea Island (possibly now Pearl Island), situated about 30 miles (48 km) east of New Orleans. It took six days and nights to ferry the troops, each transit taking around ten hours.[22]

There were three potential routes to the east of the Mississippi that the British could take, in addition to traversing up the Mississippi itself.[23] Rather than a slow approach to New Orleans up the Mississippi River, the British chose to advance on an overland route.[24] The first route was to take the Rigolets passage into Lake Pontchartrain, and thence to disembark two miles north of the city. One hindrance was the fort at Petit Coquilles at the Rigolets passage.

The second option was to row to the Plain of Gentilly via the Bayou Chef Menteur, and to take the Chef Menteur Road that went from the Rigolets to the city. It was narrow, and could be easily blocked. Jackson was aware of this, and had it well guarded.[23]

The third option was to head to Bayou Bienvenue, then Bayou Mazant and via the Villeré Canal to disembark at a point one mile from the Mississippi and seven miles south of the city. This latter option was taken by Keane.[23]

Andrew Lambert notes that Keane squandered a passing opportunity to succeed, when he decided to not take the open road from the Rigolets to New Orleans by way of Bayou Chef Menteur.[24] Reilly observes that there has been a general acceptance that Cochrane cajoled Keane into a premature and ill-advised attack, but there is no evidence to support this theory.[25] Codrington's correspondence does imply that the first option was intended to be followed by Cochrane, based upon inaccurate map details, as documented by Cochrane's papers. The shallow waters of the narrow passes of the Rigolets and the Chef Menteur could not take any vessel drawing eight feet or more.[26]

A further hindrance was the lack of shallow draft vessels, which Cochrane had requested, yet the Admiralty had refused.[27] As a consequence, even when using all shallow boats, it was not possible to transport more than 2,000 men at a time.[28][23][26]

### Villeré Plantation

[edit]

Affair Below New Orleans: December 23, 1814[29]

On the morning of December 23, Keane and a vanguard of 1,800 British soldiers reached the east bank of the Mississippi River, 9 miles (14 km) south of New Orleans.[30] They could have attacked the city by advancing a few hours up the undefended river road, but Keane decided to encamp at Lacoste's Plantation[31] and wait for the arrival of reinforcements.[32] The British invaded the home of Major Gabriel Villeré, but he escaped through a window[33] and hastened to warn General Jackson of the approaching army and the position of their encampment.[34]

Plan of the city and suburbs of New Orleans from an 1815 survey[35]

## Commencement of battle

[edit]

### Jackson's raid on the British camp

[edit]

Following Villeré's intelligence report, on the evening of December 23, Jackson led 2,131[36] men in a brief three-pronged assault from the north on the unsuspecting British troops, who were resting in their camp. He then pulled his forces back to the Rodriguez Canal, about 4 miles (6.4 km) south of the city. The Americans suffered 24 killed, 115 wounded, and 74 missing,[note 6] while the British reported their losses as 46 killed, 167 wounded, and 64 missing.[38][note 7] The action was consequential, since at December 25 Pakenham's forces now had an effective strength of 5,933 out of a headcount of 6,660 soldiers.[note 8] Historian Robert Quimby states that the British won a "tactical victory, which enabled them to maintain their position",[41] but they "were disabused of their expectation of an easy conquest".[42] As a consequence, the Americans gained time to transform the canal into a heavily fortified earthwork.[43]

### British reconnaissance-in-force

[edit]

On Christmas Day, General Edward Pakenham arrived on the battlefield. Two days later he received nine large naval artillery guns from Admiral Cochrane along with a hot shot furnace to silence the two U.S. Navy warships, the sloop-of-war USS Louisiana and the schooner USS Carolina, that were harassing the army for 24 hours per day the past week from the Mississippi River. The Carolina was sunk in a massive explosion by the British, but the Louisiana survived thanks to the Baratarian pirates aboard getting into rowboats and tying the ship to the rowboats and rowing it further north away from the British artillery. The Louisiana was not able to sail northward under her own power due to the attack. These two vessels were now no longer a danger to the British, but Jackson ordered the ships' surviving guns and crew to be stationed on the west bank and provide covering fire for any British assault on the river road to Line Jackson (name of the U.S. defensive line at the Rodriguez Canal) and New Orleans. After silencing the two ships, Pakenham ordered a reconnaissance-in-force on December 28 against the earthworks. The reconnaissance-in-force was designed to test Line Jackson and see how well-defended it was, and if any section of the line was weak the British would take advantage of the situation, break through, and call for thousands of more soldiers to smash through the defenses. On the right side of this offensive the British soldiers successfully sent the militia defenders into a retreating panic with their huge show of force and were just a few hundred yards from breaching the defensive line, but the left side of the reconnaissance-in-force turned into disaster for the British. The surviving artillery guns from the two neutralized warships successfully defended the section of Line Jackson closest to the Mississippi River with enfilading fire, making it look like the British offensive completely failed even though on the section closest to the swamp the British were on the verge of breaking through. Pakenham inexplicably decided to withdraw all the soldiers after seeing the left side of his reconnaissance-in-force collapsing and retreating in panic. The British suffered 16 killed and 43 wounded and the Americans suffered 7 killed and 10 wounded. Luck saved Line Jackson on this day and this was the closest the British came during the whole campaign to defeating Jackson.[44]

After the failure of this operation Pakenham met with General Keane and Admiral Cochrane that evening for an update on the situation. Pakenham wanted to use Chef Menteur Pass as the invasion route, but he was overruled by Admiral Cochrane, who insisted that his boats were providing everything needed.[45] Admiral Cochrane believed that the veteran British soldiers would easily destroy Jackson's ramshackle army, and he allegedly said that if the army did not do it, his sailors would, and the meeting settled the method and place of the attack.[46]

H. Charles McBarron, Free Men of Colour and Choctaw Indian Volunteers at New Orleans, Louisiana (1982)

When the British reconnaissance force withdrew, the Americans immediately began constructing earthworks to protect the artillery batteries, further strengthening Line Jackson. They installed eight batteries, which included one 32-pound gun, three 24-pounders, one 18-pounder, three 12-pounders, three 6-pounders, and a 6-inch (150 mm) howitzer. Jackson also sent a detachment to the west bank of the Mississippi to man two 24-pounders and two 12-pounders on the grounded warship USS Louisiana. Jackson in the first week of the New Orleans land campaign that began on December 23 also had the support of the warships in the Mississippi River, including USS Louisiana, USS Carolina, the schooner USS Eagle, and the steamboat Enterprise. The naval warships were neutralized by the heavy naval artillery guns brought in by Pakenham and Cochrane a few days after Christmas. Major Thomas Hinds' Squadron of Light Dragoons, a militia unit from the Mississippi Territory, arrived at the battle on December 22.[47]

### Artillery duel

[edit]

Battery 4, in the middle of Line Jackson, contained the biggest American artillery gun, a naval 32-pounder that was transferred from the USS Carolina before she was sunk by the British.

The main British army arrived on New Year's Day 1815 and began an artillery bombardment of the American earthworks. Jackson's headquarters, Macarty House, was fired at for the first 10 minutes of the skirmish while Jackson and his officers were eating breakfast. The house was completely destroyed but Jackson and the officers escaped harm. The Americans recovered quickly and mobilized their own artillery to fire back at the British artillery. This began an exchange of artillery fire that continued for three hours. Several of the American guns were silenced, including the 32-pounder, a 24-pounder, and a 12-pounder, while some damage was done to the earthworks. The British suffered even greater, losing 13 guns (five British batteries out of seven total batteries were silenced by the Americans). The remaining British artillery finally exhausted its ammunition, and Pakenham canceled the attack. Major General Gibbs during the artillery duel sent soldiers to try to outflank Line Jackson on the right due to the near-success of the December 28 skirmish. A combined force of Tennessee militia and Choctaw warriors used heavy small arms fire to repel this maneuver. The Tennessee and Choctaw soldiers even moved forward in front of Line Jackson and counterattacked, guerrilla-style, to guarantee the British withdrawal. After yet another failure to breach Line Jackson Pakenham decided to wait for his entire force of 8,000 men to assemble before continuing his attack (the 40th Foot arrived too late, disembarking on 12 January 1815.[48] The British lost 45 killed and 55 wounded in the artillery duel and the Americans lost 11 killed and 23 wounded.

## Battle

[edit]

The Death of Pakenham at the Battle of New Orleans by F. O. C. Darley shows the death of British Maj. Gen. Sir Edward Pakenham on January 8, 1815

The Americans had constructed three lines of defense, with the forward line four miles south of the city. It was strongly entrenched at the Rodriguez Canal, which stretched from a swamp to the river, with a timber, loop-holed breastwork and earthworks for artillery.[49]

General Lambert and two infantry battalions totaling 1700 soldiers disembarked and reinforced the British on January 5.[note 9] This brought the amount of disembarked men to about 8,000.[note 10]

The British battle plan was for an attack against the 20-gun right bank battery, then to turn those guns on the American line to assist the frontal attack.[52] Colonel William Thornton was to cross the Mississippi during the night with his force, move rapidly upriver, storm the battery commanded by Commodore Daniel Patterson on the flank of the main American entrenchments, and then open an enfilading fire on Jackson's line with the captured artillery, directly across from the earthworks manned by the vast majority of the American troops.

On the other bank, Major General Samuel Gibbs was to lead the main assault against the center left by his (2nd) brigade. As a feint, a column of light infantry companies (from 4th, 21st Foot) led by Lieutenant Colonel Robert Rennie would march along the river. This would be 'considered as belonging to' the (1st) Brigade commanded by General Keane. Keane's men would move to either exploit the success along the river, or move against the center in support of Gibbs. The right flank, along the swamp, was to be protected by light infantry (detached from 7th, 43rd, 93rd Foot) commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Timothy Jones (of the 4th Foot). The (3rd) brigade commanded by Major General John Lambert was held in reserve.[note 11]

Reilly notes that the advance columns of the brigades of Keane and Gibbs would be about 650 yards from the American lines. Given they would be in sight of, and in range of, the artillery, it was important to storm the ditch at first light.[54]

The start of the battle was marked by the launch of a signal rocket[55] at 6:20am, soon after followed by artillery fire from the British lines towards Jackson's headquarters at the McCarty house.[56]

### Right Bank

[edit]

The preparations of the British had not gone unnoticed.[57] The Louisiana Militia brigade were reinforced by 200 Kentucky militiamen commanded by Colonel Davis. They arrived at 4am, after a five mile march through mud. Exhausted, they had not eaten since noon the prior day. Morgan deployed them between two positions, a mile apart.[58]

The British dug a canal to enable 42 small boats to get to the river.[59] Preparations for the attack had floundered early on January 8, as the canal collapsed and the dam failed, leaving the sailors to drag the boats through the mud with Thornton's right bank assault force. This left the force starting off just before daybreak, eight hours late according to Thornton's dispatch,[60] assessed in 2008 to be 12 hours late.[61][note 12] In the early morning of January 8, Pakenham gave his final orders for the two-pronged assault. The frontal attack was not postponed, however, as the British hoped that the force on the right bank would create a diversion, even if they did not succeed in the assault.[59]

As a consequence of the sides of the canal caving in and choking the passage that night, only enough boats got through to carry 560 men,[63][note 13][note 14][note 15] just one-third of the intended force.[note 16] Captain Rowland Money led the Navy detachment, and Brevet Major Thomas Adair led the Marines. Money was captain of HMS Trave, and Adair was the commanding officer of HMS Vengeur's detachment of Marines.[69]Thornton did not make allowance for the current, and it carried him about a thousand yards below the intended landing place.[70][note 17]

The only British success of the battle was the delayed attack on the right bank of the Mississippi River, where Thornton's brigade of the 85th Regiment of Foot and detachments from the Royal Navy and Royal Marines[72] attacked and overwhelmed the American line.[60] The 700 militiamen were routed.[73] Reilly felt the fault lay with Morgan, who had dispersed his troops, rather than concentrating most of them around his main defence, whilst deploying a picket, to give advance warning once the British arrived.[70] The decision by General Morgan to deploy his troops in two positions a mile apart, neither defensible, was favorable for the British. Morgan's mismanagement of his Kentucky and Louisiana militiamen was an open invitation to defeat.[74] Whilst the retreat of the militia has been criticized, such a move was no less than prudent.[75] An inquiry, overseen by Major General William Carroll of the Tennessee Militia, found that the conduct was 'not reprehensible'.[note 18] Major Paul Arnaud, commanding officer of the 2nd Louisiana militia brigade, was targeted as a scapegoat for the retreat on the Right Bank.[77] His fellow Louisiana Militia officers Dejean, Cavallier and Declouet were admonished, as was Colonel John Davis of the Kentucky Militia.[76]

At around 10 am, Lambert was made aware that the right bank had been taken,[78] as signalled by a rocket launched by Gubbins. His brigade won their battle, but Thornton was badly wounded, and delegated his command to Gubbins. Army casualties among the 85th Foot were two dead, one captured, and 41 wounded,[60] the battalion reduced to 270 effectives on the Right Bank.[79] Royal Navy casualties were two dead, Captain Rowland Money and 18 seamen wounded. Royal Marine casualties were two dead, with three officers, one sergeant, and 12 other ranks wounded. By contrast, the defenders' casualties were two dead, eleven wounded and nineteen missing.[note 19] Both Jackson and Commodore Patterson reported that the retreating forces had spiked their cannon, leaving no guns to turn on the Americans' main defense line; Major Michell's diary, however, claims that he had "commenced cleaning enemy's guns to form a battery to enfilade their lines on the left bank".[81]

General Lambert ordered his Chief of Artillery Colonel Alexander Dickson to assess the position. Dickson reported back that no fewer than 2,000 men would be required to hold the position. Lambert issued orders to withdraw after the defeat of their main army on the east bank and retreated, taking a few American prisoners and cannon with them.[82] The Americans were so dismayed by the loss of this battery, which would be capable of inflicting much damage on their lines when the attack was renewed, that they were preparing to abandon the town when they received the news that the British were withdrawing, according to one British regimental historian.[83] Reilly does not agree, but does note that Jackson was eager to send Humbert to take command of 400 men to retake the position from Thornton's troops.[81][note 20] Carson Ritchie goes as far to assert that 'it was not Pakenham, but Sir Alexander Dickson who lost the third battle of New Orleans' in consequence of his recommendation to evacuate the Right Bank,[81] and that 'he could think of nothing but defense'.[81]

This success, being described as 'a brilliant exploit by the British, and a disgraceful exhibition [of General Morgan's leadership] by the Americans,'[87][88] had no effect on the outcome of the battle.[87][88]

The positions were reoccupied on the 9th, and Patterson reestablished his battery on January 10.[89]

### Left Bank

[edit]

The Battle of New Orleans: Situation on 8 January 1815 Battle of New Orleans: Jan. 8th

#### Preparation for the assault by the 44th Foot

[edit]

The 44th Regiment of Foot was assigned by General Edward Pakenham to be the advance guard for the first column of attack on 8 January 1815, and to carry the fascines and ladders which would enable the British troops to cross the ditch and scale the American ramparts. The commanding officer of the 44th, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Mullins had been commended twice during the Chesapeake campaign, and was recently promoted. He was noted as being haughty, and less than diligent in his duties as a staff officer in the days prior to the attack.[90] Pakenham ordered Mullins to determine the locations of those fascines and ladders that evening of the 7th, in order that there would be no delays in retrieving them the following morning.[90]

Gibbs also instructed him to confirm the locations of those fascines and ladders. Mullins delegated this to a subordinate, Johnston, who went to headquarters to do so. Whilst there, he was observed by General Gibbs, who enquired what he was doing. Upon being told, Gibbs wrote a formal order to Mullins that 'The Commanding Officer of the 44th will ascertain where the fascines and Ladders are deposited this evening.' A map of where the items were stored was given to Johnston. Upon returning, he presented the map to Mullins, which he dismissively put in his waistcoat.[91]

At 5 pm that evening, Mullins summoned his officers for a meeting, to discuss the attack. One of his subordinates questioned the location of the ladders, and received a caustic rebuke. He was approached by his Captain and hut-mate at 8 pm, and diplomatically suggested preparing for the next day, including the order from Gibbs to personally see where the items were stored. Mullins was dismissive, and stated there would be plenty of time in the morning.[91] Pakenham sent an order to an engineer officer to communicate with Mullins as to where the items were stored, in the redoubt. Coincidentally, Mullins arrived in the presence of the engineer officer and the artillery officer. Upon being read Pakenham's instructions, and being asked if he had any questions, Mullins replied that it was clear.[92]

During the night, an advance battery was set up forward of the advance redoubt, a distance of about 880 yards (800 m)[93] or 500 yards (460 m),[94] positioned 800 yards (730 m) south from Line Jackson.[note 21] Mullins, thinking this to be the location of the materiel, passed the advance redoubt and halted the regiment at the battery. Upon discovering his mistake, he sent about 300 of his 427 men back to the redoubt at the double-quick to pick up the fascines and ladders, but it was too late. The other regiments were already advancing behind the 44th, the party of 300 lost formation as they struggled to reach the redoubt, and as day dawned, the attack commenced before the supplies could be brought forward.[96][97]

#### The attack on the Left Bank

[edit]

The main attack began in darkness and a heavy fog, but the fog lifted as the British neared the main American line, exposing them to withering artillery fire. The British column had already been disordered by the passage of the 300 returning to the redoubt, and they advanced into a storm of American fire. Without the fascines and ladders, they were unable to scale and storm the American position.[59] The British forces fell into confusion, thrown into disorder by the flight of the advance guard.[74] Most of the senior officers were killed or wounded, including Major General Samuel Gibbs, who was killed leading the main attack column on the right, and Colonel Rennie, who led a detachment on the left by the river.[98] Mullins had compromised their attack.[99]

E. Percy Moran, The Battle of New Orleans (1910)

The Highlanders of the 93rd Regiment of Foot were ordered to leave Keane's assault column advancing along the river, possibly because of Thornton's delay in crossing the river and the artillery fire that might hit them, and to move across the open field to join the main force on the right. Keane fell wounded as he crossed the field with the 93rd. Rennie's men managed to attack and overrun an American advance redoubt next to the river, but they could neither hold the position nor successfully storm the main American line behind it without reinforcements.[98] Within a few minutes, the American 7th US Infantry arrived, moved forward, and fired upon the British in the captured redoubt; within half an hour, Rennie and nearly all of his men were dead. In the main attack on the right, the British infantrymen flung themselves to the ground, huddled in the canal, or were mowed down by a combination of musket fire and grapeshot from the Americans. A handful made it to the top of the parapet on the right, but they were killed or captured. The riflemen of the 95th Regiment of Foot had advanced in open skirmish order ahead of the main assault force and were concealed in the ditch below the parapet, unable to advance further without support.

The two large main assaults were repulsed. Pakenham and Gibbs were fatally wounded while on horseback by grapeshot fired from the earthworks.[100] Major Wilkinson of the 21st Regiment of Foot reformed his lines and made a third assault. They were able to reach the entrenchments and attempted to scale them. Wilkinson made it to the top before being shot. The Americans were amazed at his bravery and carried him behind the rampart.[101] The British soldiers stood out in the open and were shot apart with grapeshot from Line Jackson, including the 93rd Highlanders, having no orders to advance further or retreat.[100]

The light infantry companies commanded by Jones attacked the right flank, but were repulsed by Coffee's troops. The attack having failed, the troops withdrew, and sought cover in the woods. Lieutenant Colonel Jones was mortally injured.[102]

General Lambert was in the reserve and took command. He gave the order for his reserve to advance and ordered the withdrawal of the army. The reserve was used to cover the retreat of what was left of the British army in the field. Artillery fire from both sides ceased at 9 am[103] with American batteries ceasing at 2 pm.[104] Whilst the attack was of two hours duration, the main assault lasted only thirty minutes.[105]

Chalmette Battlefield: The main British attack was aimed just beyond the two farthest cannons at Batteries 5 and 6

### Analysis

[edit]

The Battle of New Orleans was remarkable both for its apparent brevity and its casualties, though some numbers are in dispute and contradict the official statistics. The defenders of the Left Bank had casualties amounting to 11 killed and 23 wounded;[106] American losses were only 13 killed, 39 wounded, and 19 missing or captured in total on that day.[5] Robert Remini[7] and William C Davis[107] make reference to the British casualty reports of 291 killed, 1,262 wounded, and 484 missing, a total loss of 2,037 men. Among the prisoners taken when the British retreated from the battlefield, Jackson estimated three hundred were mortally wounded.[note 22] Colonel Arthur P. Hayne's dispatch to Jackson dated January 13 estimated the British had 700 fatalities and 1400 wounded, with 501 prisoners of war in his custody.[note 23] A reduction in headcount due to 443 British soldiers' deaths since the prior month was reported on January 25, which is lower than Hayne's estimate of 700 for the battle alone.[40]

The large number of casualties suffered by the British on the Left Bank reflects their failure to maintain the element of surprise, with plenty of advance notice being given to the defenders, owing to the delays in executing the attack on the Right Bank.[110] The failure of the British to have breached the parapet and conclusively eliminated the first line of defense was to result in high casualties as successive waves of men marching in column whilst the prepared defenders were able to direct their fire into a Kill zone, hemmed in by the riverbank and the swamp.[111] The American cannon opened fire when the British were at 500 yards, the riflemen at 300 yards, and the muskets at 100 yards.[112]

Reilly supports the assertion that it was the American artillery that won the battle. The losses among the regiments out of range of small arms fire were disproportionately high, with almost every British account emphasizing the effect of heavy gunfire. In contrast, the riflemen of the 95th Foot in skirmish order, the most difficult target for artillery, had lost only 11 killed. Dickson's eyewitness account is clear that the British were only within musket shot range for less than five minutes. The account by Latour states the battalions of Plauché, Daquin, Lacoste, along with three quarters of the 44th US Infantry did not fire at all. In order to have inflicted such a heavy toll on the British, it would not have been possible to have done this primarily with musket fire, of which the best trained men could only manage two shots per minute.[77] Unlike their British counterparts, the American forces had larger guns, and more of them. They were situated in well-protected earthworks, with a ditch and stockade. The Americans therefore had a number of advantages, but they should not minimize the skill and bravery of their gunners.[113] Stoltz is of the opinion that Jackson was victorious because an American army guarded a strategic choke point and defended it with professionally designed fieldworks and artillery.[114]

Almost universal blame was assigned to Colonel Mullins of the 44th Foot which had been detailed to carry fascines and ladders to the front to enable the British soldiers to cross the ditch and scale the parapet and fight their way to the American breastwork. Mullins was found half a mile to the rear when he was needed at the front.[note 24] Pakenham learned of Mullins' conduct and placed himself at the head of the 44th, endeavoring to lead them to the front with the implements needed to storm the works, when he fell wounded after being hit with grapeshot. He was hit again while being helped to mount a horse, this time mortally wounded.[116]

Pakenham's choice of units has come under question. Pakenham's aide, Wylly, was scornful about the 44th Foot, and thought the 21st Foot was lacking in discipline. His most experienced infantry regiments, the 7th Foot and 43rd Foot, veterans of Wellington's Peninsular War army, were kept in reserve in the plan of attack.[117]

The inability of Thornton's troops to have taken the Right Bank at night, in advance of the main assault, meant that the British were enfiladed by the American batteries. It has been observed that Keane's failure, to have taken the Chef Menteur Road, was compounded when the aggressively natured Pakenham went ahead and launched a frontal assault before the vital flank operation on the other bank of the river had been completed, at a cost of over 2,000 casualties.[24]

Poor British planning and communication, plus costly frontal assaults against an entrenched enemy, caused lopsided British casualties.[118] The Duke of Wellington was saddened by the death of this man, his brother-in-law, with whom he had been on campaign in Spain. A grieving Wellington vented his anger towards Cochrane, whom he blamed:

> I cannot but regret that he was ever employed on such a service or with such a colleague. The expedition to New Orleans originated with that colleague ... The Americans were prepared with an army in a fortified position which still would have been carried, if the duties of others, that is of the Admiral [Cochrane], had been as well performed as that of he whom we now lament.[119]

Patterson notes that the plan of attack was not his own, he conceded to follow it, despite his reservations, and his death prevented him from reformulating a subsequent attack, following the initial failure.[120]

Reilly opines that the brilliance of Cochrane's plan to take possession of the Right Bank batteries was fully comprehended, after its capture. He believes it was the failure of Pakenham's staff to wake him, and to let him know the Right Bank landing was not possible, neither at daylight, nor with the numbers of soldiers originally envisaged, more than any other action or omission in the entire campaign, that was the biggest failure on the part of the British that led to proceed with the attack, with the disastrous outcome that day.[98]

Regarding the American forces on the Right Bank, Reilly states their defenses were inadequate, and that Morgan's deployment of his troops was incompetent.[121] The resultant court of inquiry made no mention of General David Bannister Morgan at all.[122]

## Aftermath

[edit]

### Fort St. Philip

[edit]

Main article: Siege of Fort St. Philip (1815)

Fort St. Philip, manned by an American garrison, defended the river approach to New Orleans. British naval forces attacked the fort on January 9 but withdrew after ten days of bombardment with exploding bomb shells from two bomb vessels, mounting a total of four mortars.[note 25][note 26] In a dispatch sent to the Secretary of War, dated January 19, Jackson stated: "I am strengthened not only by [the defeat of the British at New Orleans] ... but by the failure of his fleet to pass fort St. Philip."[125]

### British withdrawal

[edit]

Despite news of capture of the American battery on the west bank of the Mississippi River, British officers concluded that continuing the Louisiana campaign would be too costly. Three days after the battle, General Lambert held a council of war. Deciding to withdraw, the British left camp at Villeré's Plantation by January 19.[126] They were not pursued in any strength.[note 27] The Chalmette battlefield was the plantation home of Ignace Martin de Lino (1755–1815), a Spanish veteran of the American Revolutionary War.[note 28] The British returned to where they had landed, a distance in excess of sixty miles. The final troops re-embarked on January 27.[129]

The British fleet embarked the troops on February 4, 1815 and sailed toward Dauphin Island at Mobile Bay on February 7, 1815.[130][131] The army captured Fort Bowyer at the entrance to Mobile Bay on February 12. Preparations to attack Mobile were in progress when news arrived of the Treaty of Ghent. General Jackson also had made tentative plans to attack the British at Mobile and to continue the war into Spanish Florida. With Britain having ratified the treaty and the United States having resolved that hostilities should cease pending imminent ratification, the British departed, sailing to the West Indies.[132] The British government was determined on peace with the United States, and speculation that it planned to permanently seize the Louisiana Purchase has been rejected by historians. Thus Carr concludes, "by the end of 1814 Britain had no interest in continuing the conflict for the possession of New Orleans or any other part of American territory, but rather, due to the European situation and her own domestic problems, was anxious to conclude hostilities as quickly and gracefully as possible."[133]

It would have been problematic for the British to continue the war in North America, due to Napoleon's escape from Elba on February 26, 1815, which ensured their forces were needed in Europe.[note 29] General Lambert participated in the Battle of Waterloo, as did the 4th Foot.

### Distinguished service as mentioned in dispatches

[edit]

> In his general orders of January 21, General Jackson, in thanking the troops, paid special tributes to the Louisiana organizations, and made particular mention of Capts. Dominique and Belluche, and the Lafitte brothers, all of the Barataria privateers; of General Garrique de Flanjac, a State Senator, and brigadier of militia, who served as a volunteer; of Majors Plauche, Sainte-Geme. Lacoste, D'Aquin, Captain Savary, Colonel De la Ronde, General Humbert, Don Juan de Araya, the Mexican Field-Marshal; Major-General Villeré and General Morgan, the Engineers Latour and Blanchard; the Attakapas dragoons, Captain Dubuclay; the cavalry from the Felicianas and the Mississippi territory. General Labattut had command of the town, of which Nicolas Girod was then the mayor.[135]

> Among those who most distinguished themselves during this brief but memorable campaign, were, next to the Commander-in-chief, Generals Villeré, Carroll, Coffee, Ganigues, Flanjac, Colonel Delaronde, Commodore Patterson, Majors Lacoste, Planche, Hinds, Captain Sainte-Geme, Lieutenants Jones, Parker, Marent, and Dominique; Colonel Savary, a man of colour nor must we omit to mention Lafitte, pirate though he was.[136]

### Assessment

[edit]

Two examples of artillery pieces on Line Jackson. The one on the right is naval artillery and the left one is army artillery. The Americans used both equally. The British used mostly naval artillery during the campaign and with the small wheels and large frames these guns became bogged down in the muddy fields of Chalmette.

For the campaign, American casualties totaled 333 with 55 killed, 185 wounded, and 93 missing,[note 30] while British casualties totaled 2,459 with 386 killed, 1,521 wounded, and 552 missing,[note 31] according to the respective official casualty returns. A reduction in headcount due to 443 British soldiers' deaths since the prior month was reported on January 25. The effective strength of the British had reduced from 5,933[note 33]

The hundreds of dead British soldiers were likely buried at Jacques Villeré's plantation, which was the headquarters of the British Army during the New Orleans campaign. Nobody knows exactly where their final resting spot is. The only deceased British soldiers transported back to the United Kingdom were Generals Pakenham and Gibbs.[141] Lieutenant Colonel Robert Rennie was buried by the 7th US Infantry, as ordered by Jackson, and his personal effects were passed on to Norman Pringle (an officer of the 21st Foot), via a flag of truce, to be forwarded on to Rennie's widow.[142]

British Generals Pakenham and Gibbs Memorial at St. Paul's Cathedral in London

A discredited historical interpretation holds that the British had an ambitious colonization plan for the "Crown colony of Louisiana" if they had succeeded in capturing New Orleans and Mobile. While some British generals did speculate, the British government under Lord Liverpool rejected all such ideas and planned to finalize the peace by ratifying the Treaty of Ghent as soon as possible, regardless of what happened in New Orleans.[143] For the discredited speculation see Abernethy (1961).[144] Cavell notes that there is little in the correspondence to imply that Britain planned permanently to occupy or to annex New Orleans or Louisiana territory and Davis states in his book 'no one in [the British] government seems to have advocated permanent possession'.[145][146]

Both sides faced challenges with logistics. This was especially the case for the British. The shortage of small boats had a noticeable impact when the landing on the Right Bank was made with only a third of the force originally planned, and they arrived far later than the time when they were supposed to arrive. The transport ships with the 26 artillery pieces of the siege train did not arrive until January 11, and would not see action until the engagement at Fort Bowyer on February 7, 1815. The poor quality of the roads through the swampy terrain, coupled with the lack of horses, was a burden upon the British supply network. These logistical shortcomings of the British were a precursor to similar issues that would be experienced during the Crimean War.

## Legacy

[edit]

### The battle in American historiography

[edit]

The battle became historically important mainly for the meaning Americans gave it, particularly with respect to Jackson. According to Matthew Warshauer, the Battle of New Orleans meant, "defeating the most formidable army ever arrayed against the young republic, saving the nation's reputation in the War of 1812, and establishing [Jackson] as America's preeminent hero."[147] News of victory "came upon the country like a clap of thunder in the clear azure vault of the firmament, and traveled with electromagnetic velocity, throughout the confines of the land."[148] Popular pamphlets, songs, editorials, speeches, and plays glorified Jackson's new, heroic image.

The Eighth of January was a federal holiday from 1828 to 1861, and it was among the earliest national celebrations, as "previously, Americans had only celebrated events such as the Fourth of July or George Washington's birthday on a national scale".[149] The anniversary of the battle was celebrated as an American holiday for many years called "The Eighth".[150][151]

The historiography has been revisited by contemporary historians. According to Troy Bickham, the American victory at New Orleans "did not have an impact on the war's outcome", but it shaped "how the Americans received the end of the war by creating the illusion of military victory."[152] Benn notes that American popular memory focused on the victories at Baltimore, Plattsburgh, and New Orleans to present the war as a successful effort to assert American national honor, or a Second War of Independence, in which the mighty British Empire was humbled and humiliated.[153] In keeping with this sentiment, there is a popularly held view that Britain had planned to annex Louisiana in 1815.[154] The amoral depravity of the British, in contrast with the wholesome behavior of the Americans, has the "beauty and booty" story at the center of a popular history account of Jackson's victory at New Orleans.[155] According to historian Alan Taylor, the final victory at New Orleans had in that sense "enduring and massive consequences".[156] It gave the Americans "continental predominance", while it left the indigenous nations dispossessed, powerless, and vulnerable.[157]

### The role played by riflemen of Jackson's army

[edit]

"The Hunters of Kentucky" was a song written to commemorate Jackson's victory over the British at the Battle of New Orleans.[158] In both 1824 and 1828 Jackson used the song as his campaign song during his presidential campaigns.[159]

"Hunters of Kentucky" propagated various beliefs about the war. One of them was calling the Pennsylvania Rifle the Kentucky Rifle. Another was crediting the riflemen with the victory of the Battle of New Orleans, when it could be said it was Jackson's artillery that was actually responsible for the win. Finally, one stanza said that the British planned to ransack New Orleans, which was unlikely to happen.[160]

In keeping with the idea of the conflict as a "second war of independence" against John Bull, the narrative of the skilled rifleman in the militia had parallels with the myth of the Minuteman as the key factor in winning against the British.[161][note 34]

The Kentucky militiamen were the worst equipped of Jackson's forces. Only a third were armed, lamented Jackson to Monroe.[163] On top of this, they were poorly clothed, and were weakened from the long journey. (This explains their poor performance against Thornton's troops on the Right Bank, where they were quickly routed. A court of inquiry cleared Colonel Davis of blame. The outcome was not to the satisfaction of the Kentuckians. Two years later, an account was published in the Kentucky Reporter, that grossly exaggerated the Kentucky militia's resistance, whilst bringing into question the behavior of the Louisiana Militia and its commander.[122]) Upon learning this, Jackson was purported to have quipped 'I never in my life seen a Kentuckian without a gun, a pack of cards, and a jug of whiskey.'[164]

The author Augustus Caesar Buell had a book about Jackson published posthumously. It contains his argument that the effect of the artillery, relative to riflemen, was negligible. He "provides the most authentic solution" by claiming to quote from a primary source document from a fictitious department of the British Army. He declared there were 3,000 men wounded or killed by rifle munitions, 326 by musket or artillery.[165] The numbers provided run counter to those in primary sources with known provenance.[7] Although there are contemporary secondary sources that champion the riflemen as the cause of this victory,[166] Ritchie notes the British reserve was 650 yards away from the American line, so never came within rifle range, yet suffered 182 casualties.[167] Owsley estimates that between 800 and 1200 privately owned rifles were used, with the majority of Jackson's men equipped with the musket.[168]

Histories of the battle, in particular those directed towards a popular audience, have continued to emphasize the part played by the riflemen.[169][170] In more recent years, starting with Brown in 1969, scholarship has revealed that the militia played a smaller role, and that most British casualties were attributed to artillery fire.[171] The engineers who oversaw the erection of the ramparts, the slaves who built them, and the trained gunners who manned the cannons have seen their contributions understated as a consequence of these popular histories that have been written since the Era of Good Feelings.[161] Popular memory's omissions of the numerous artillery batteries, professionally designed earthworks, and the negligible effect of aimed rifle fire during that battle lulled those inhabitants of the South into believing that war against the North would be much easier than it really would be.[172] Owsley notes that De Tousard was adamant that the artillery fire broke the British, many of its gunners being of French extraction.[168]

Until fairly recently, "the supremacy of Kentucky and Tennessee rifles in deciding the battle was undisputed."[173] Whilst this is recognised in some contemporary sources as folklore,[170][174][175] it is seen as an emblem of a bygone era in Kentucky. Yet, a bronze statue was dedicated in 2015 in honor of the local Soldier - Ephraim McLean Brank - who, as legend has it, was the "Kentucky rifleman" at the Battle of New Orleans. It is situated at Muhlenburg County Courthouse in Greenville, Kentucky.[176] There are still those who are happy to cling to accounts of forefathers from their state, and how the "long riflemen killed all of the officers ranked Captain and above in this battle,"[177] and "Victory was made possible by an unlikely combination of oddly disparate forces, British logistic oversights and tactical caution, and superior American backwoods marksmanship."[178]

### "Beauty and Booty" controversy

[edit]

After the battle, a claim was published by George Poindexter, in a letter dated January 20 to the Mississippi Republican, that Pakenham's troops had used "Beauty and Booty" as a watchword:

> The watch-word and countersign of the enemy on the morning of the 8th was, BOOTY AND BEAUTY. Comment is unnecessary on these significant allusions held out to a licentious soldiery. Had victory declared on their side, the scenes of Havre de Grace, of Hampton, of Alexandria . . . would, without doubt, have been reacted at New Orleans, with all the unfeeling and brutal inhumanity of the savage foe with whom we are contending.[179]

This was republished in Niles' Register,[179] the National Intelligencer on February 13, and other newspapers.[180] Whilst there were criticisms from the Federalist press, as well as from Poindexter's enemies, as to how reliable this information was, it was widely accepted elsewhere. Senator Charles Jared Ingersoll made direct reference to this in his speech to Congress on February 16, reproduced in full in the National Intelligencer.[181] He continued, in an elated manner, 'with the tidings of this triumph from the south, to have peace from the east, is such a fullness of gratification as must overflow all hearts with gratitude.'[181] He saw the news of victory at New Orleans against an immoral foe, followed by news of peace, as a positive sentiment to unite the different peoples of the United States,[182] the zeitgeist of these postwar years later becoming known as the Era of Good Feelings.

This watchword claim, as originated by Poindexter, was repeated in Eaton's "Life of General Jackson", first published in 1817. A second edition of this biography was published in 1824, when Jackson made his first presidential bid. Further editions were published for the presidential elections of 1828 and 1833.[183] Editions from 1824 onwards now contained the claim that documentary evidence proved the watchword was used.[184] As a consequence it was reproduced in a travelogue in 1833.[185]

Following the publishing of a travelogue in 1833, whereby the author James Stuart referred to the watchword,[185] this hitherto unknown controversy became known in Great Britain. In response to the author, five British officers who had fought in the battle, Keane, Lambert, Thornton, Blakeney and Dickson, signed a rebuttal in August 1833. It is stated this was published in The Times by American sources,[186] but this is not the case.[note 35] Niles's Register, which originally printed Poindexter's claim, then printed the British rebuttal with the editorial comment, "Six of the principal officers.... have distinctively denied any knowledge [of the watchword].. The following interesting documents have been sent us for insertion.":[190]

> We, the undersigned, serving in that army, and actually present, and through whom all orders to the troops were promulgated, do, in justice to the memory of that distinguished officer who commanded and led the attack, the whole tenor of whose life was marked by manliness of purpose and integrity of view, most unequivocally deny that any such promise (of plunder) was ever held out to the army, or that the watchword asserted to have been given out was ever issued. And, further, that such motives could never have actuated the man who, in the discharge of his duty to his king and country, so eminently upheld the character of a true British soldier.[191]

James Stuart's account was criticised by a veteran, Major Norman Pringle, who wrote several letters to the Edinburgh Evening Courant. In response, Stuart published a book to refute these criticisms.[192] He quoted Major Eaton as a reliable source, and later went on to comment that as a result of Stuart, it had become accepted the watchword was a falsehood.[note 36] One quote from the book "certainly the refutation of the charge as stated in Major Eaton's Book is, though tardy, complete"[194] considered the matter closed. Notwithstanding the refutation, the story had benefited both Jackson and Eaton's political careers, who had nothing left to prove.[195]

The publication of Eaton's book in Britain in 1834, and in subsequent editions, still contained the story of "booty and beauty". The British Ambassador, Sir Charles Richard Vaughan wrote to President Jackson about the matter. Vaughan wrote that Eaton 'expressed himself glad, that the report was at last contradicted' by the rebuttal, but there was no pressure on him to retract his comments from the Jackson biography.[196] There is no recounting in 1833 of Jackson's supposed encounter with the mystery Creole planter (Denis de la Ronde), as reported by S C Arthur (see below).

Arthur's 1915 publication, quoting from Parton's 1861 biography of Jackson, itself quoting extensively from Vincent Nolte's book published in 1854, has referred to a Creole planter reportedly visited a British military camp a few days prior to the battle, being welcomed in after claiming that he was supportive of a possible British takeover of the region. While dining at dinner with a group of British officers, the planter claimed he heard one officer offer the toast of "Beauty and Booty". After gathering information on Pakenham's battle plans, the planter left the camp the next day and reported the information he had gathered to Jackson; the rumor that the British were offering toasts to "Beauty and Booty" soon spread throughout New Orleans, in particular among the upper-class women of the city.[197] Nolte's book reveals the 'planter' to be no other than Denis de la Ronde,[198] the colonel commanding the Third Regiment of the Louisiana Militia.[199]

In the years since the Treaty of Ghent, not only did Jackson's reputation benefit from his major victory against the British, but also from vilifying the British as an amoral foe, against whom a second war of independence had been fought. As a national hero, it facilitated his subsequent career in politics, and tenure as President of the United States.

### Political outcomes

[edit]

New England as a whole was against the war. The leaders of the Federalist Party of New England met at the Hartford Convention and decided to deliver a set of demands to the federal government in January 1815.[200] The moderates were in charge and there was no proposal to secede from the union. When the Hartford delegation reached Washington word of the great American victory at New Orleans came and the Federalists were seen as traitors and anti-American; the Federalist Party was permanently ruined.[201]

The economic impact of the War of 1812 resulted in discord for those in the northern New England states harmed by the blockade. Their concerns were voiced through the Federalist Party. The Hartford Convention saw them discuss their grievances concerning the ongoing war and the political problems arising from the federal government's increasing power. Federalists were increasingly opposed to slavery, both on principle and because the Three-fifths Compromise gave a political advantage to their opponents, who gained increased representation because of the weight given to slaves. This had resulted in the dominance of Virginia in the presidency since 1800.

By the time the Federalist "ambassadors" got to Washington, the war was over and news of Andrew Jackson's stunning victory in the Battle of New Orleans had raised American morale immensely. The "ambassadors" hastened back to Massachusetts, but not before they had done fatal damage to the Federalist Party. The Federalists were thereafter associated with the disloyalty and parochialism of the Hartford Convention and destroyed as a political force. Across the nation, Republicans used the great victory at New Orleans to ridicule the Federalists as cowards, defeatists and secessionists. Pamphlets, songs, newspaper editorials, speeches and entire plays on the Battle of New Orleans drove home the point.[149]

The Era of Good Feelings resulted from the Battle of New Orleans. From 1815 to 1825 there was single-party rule in Washington and an overwhelming feeling of patriotism due to the extinction of the Federalist Party. The era saw the collapse of the Federalist Party and an end to the bitter partisan disputes between it and the dominant Democratic-Republican Party during the First Party System.

Andrew Jackson served as the seventh president of the United States from 1829 to 1837.

The void left by the Federalist Party was replaced by the Whig Party, which came into being in 1833, in opposition to Andrew Jackson, and his policies as President. The Whig Party fell apart in the 1850s due to divisions over the expansion of slavery. Once more, a division between southern and northern states came into being.

### Memorials

[edit]

Chalmette Monument

The Louisiana Historical Association dedicated its Memorial Hall facility to Jackson on January 8, 1891, the 76th anniversary of the Battle of New Orleans.[202] The Federal government established a national historical park in 1907 to preserve the Chalmette Battlefield, which also includes the Chalmette National Cemetery. It features the 100-foot-tall Chalmette Monument and is part of the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve. The monument was supposed to be at least 150 feet tall but the very soft and wet soil limited it to 100 feet.[203] A five-cent stamp in 1965 commemorated the sesquicentennial of the Battle of New Orleans and 150 years of peace with Britain. The bicentennial was celebrated in 2015 with a Forever stamp depicting United States troops firing on British soldiers along Line Jackson.

Prior to the twentieth century the British government commonly commissioned and paid for statues of fallen generals and admirals during battles to be placed inside St Paul's Cathedral in London as a memorial to their sacrifices. Major Generals Pakenham and Gibbs were both memorialized in a statue at St Paul's that was sculpted by Sir Richard Westmacott.[204]

Sesquicentennial issue of 1965 |

|

## In popular culture

[edit]

* The Buccaneer, a 1938 American adventure film made by Cecil B. DeMille starring Fredric March, was based on Jean Lafitte and the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812.
* The Buccaneer, a 1958 pirate-war film starring Yul Brynner as Jean Lafitte and Charlton Heston as Andrew Jackson, is a fictionalization of the privateer Lafitte helping Jackson win the Battle of New Orleans.
* Johnny Horton's cover of the Jimmy Driftwood song The Battle of New Orleans, which describes the battle from the perspective of an American soldier, reached number 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 1959.
* In The Simpsons episode "Whacking Day", Superintendent Chalmers quizzes Lisa Simpson on the Battle of New Orleans as part of a plan by Principal Skinner to make Springfield Elementary School seem more successful than it really is.

## See also

[edit]

* List of War of 1812 battles
* Our Lady of Prompt Succor
* Saint Malo, Louisiana

## References

[edit]

### Footnotes

[edit]

1. ^ The monthly returns for British forces in North America, archive reference WO 17/1218, prepared on the 25th day of the month, provide valuable details on unit strengths. Images of the original documents can be seen on microfilm at The Historic New Orleans Collection's research center. Transcriptions of the returns are online and can be downloaded via Bamford 2014.
2. ^ Quoting Jackson's report dated January 14, 1815.[5] and reproduction of Adjutant General Robert Butler's casualty report to Brigadier General Parker dated January 16, 1815.[6]
3. ^ 'Nor did he [Bunbury] favour attacking New Orleans... the target looked difficult with nightmarish navigation, climate, and logistics.... Despite Bunbury's incisive critique, an attack on New Orleans was ordered.'[12]
4. ^ Gene Allen Smith makes reference to a letter from the Secretary of the Admiralty to Cochrane dated August 10, 1814. A copy of this document is accessible at The Historic New Orleans Collection, via microfilm. Smith also mentions how several Royal Navy officers had suggested the idea of attacking Louisiana from 1813 onwards.[13]
5. ^ Refer to the map of Louisiana.
6. ^ Reproducing Adjutant General Robert Butler's casualty report to Brigadier General Parker dated January 16, 1815.[37]
7. ^ Despatch from Hayne to Jackson dated January 10. 'Prisoners taken [December 24]- One major, 2 lieutenants, 1 midshipman 66 non-commissioned officers and privates'[39]
8. ^ Within Monthly Return, December 1814.[40]
9. ^ 'On the 5th of January the 7th and 43rd landed.. mustering upwards of 1700 bayonets'[50]
10. ^ 'Fresh spirit was given to the army by the unexpected arrival of Major General Lambert, with the 7th and 43rd; two fine battalions, mustering each eight hundred effective men. By this reinforcement, together with the addition of a body of sailors and marines from the fleet, our numbers amounted now to little short of eight thousand men; a force which, in almost any other quarter of America, would have been irresistible.'[51] This figure of about 8,000 is corroborated by other sources.
11. ^ The battle plan was outlined in a memorandum by Pakenham, a copy of which has been reproduced.[53]
12. ^ Gleig narrates in the third person of his participation on the attack on the Right Bank. 'No boats had arrived; hour after hour elapsed before they came.... Instead of reaching the opposite bank at latest by midnight, dawn was beginning to appear before the boats quitted the canal.... It was in vain that they made good their landing and formed upon the beach, without opposition or alarm; day had already broke, and the signal-rocket was seen in the air, while they were yet four miles from the batteries, which ought hours ago to have been taken.'[62]
13. ^ 'We were unable to proceed across the river until eight hours after the time appointed, and even then, with only a third of the force which you had allotted for the service.'[60]
14. ^ Concerning the strength and composition of Thornton's force. Correspondence from Cochrane to Admiralty dated January 18, contained within "No. 16991". The London Gazette. March 9, 1815., also in archives with reference ADM 1/508 folio 757, states 'the whole amounting to about six hundred men'. Gleig uses the source document a report from Thornton to Pakenham 'we were unable to proceed across the river until eight hours after the time appointed, and even then with only a third part of the force which you had allotted for the service viz 298 of the 85th, and 200 Seamen and Marines.'[64] Duncan, with recourse to Dickson's papers: '[Pakenham] sent to enquire how many men had been embarked: and, having been informed that the 85th Foot, with some Marines—amounting in all to 460 — had been put on board, and that there was room for 100 more, he ordered that additional number to be embarked, and the whole to cross without delay.'[65]
15. ^ 'The force of the enemy did not exceed four hundred men.' Despatch from Major Foelcker to General Jackson dated January 8, 1815. 'The force of the enemy on this side amounted to 1,000, men.' Despatch from Patterson to United States Secretary of the Navy dated January 13, 1815. Both reproduced in a secondary source[66]
16. ^ Hughes & Brodine quotes from a letter from General Lambert to the Secretary of State for War dated January 28, republished in the London Gazette,[67] which mentions the original plan was to send over a larger force of a further 100 sailors, a further 300 marines, four cannons with gunners, and the battalion of the 5th West India Regiment.[68]
17. ^ Remini states the plan was to land three miles south of Morgan's position, but they actually landed four miles south.[71]
18. ^ Court martial of inquiry, relative to the retreat on January 8, reproduced in Latour (1816), appendix LXII.[76]
19. ^ Greene, with reference to both Jackson's papers and Tatum's journal (both edited by Bassett) and Bassett, with reference to Tatum's journal corroborated Tatum's figures.[80]
20. ^ Davis, quoting from correspondence from Shaumburg to Claiborne, states that Humbert arrived, demanding 400 men without written orders, and was rebuffed by Morgan.[84] The written order from Jackson has survived, however, with Humbert accompanied by Lafitte. Patterson's letter dated January 13 mentions 'a large re-enforcement of militia having been immediately despatched by general Jackson to this side.'[85] Latour, an eye witness, has the following to say: '[Humbert was ordered] to cross over with a re-enforcement of four hundred men, take the command of the troops, and repulse the enemy.. The order he had received, was only verbal, owing to the urgency of the occasion. There arose disputes concerning military precedence. Other militia officers did not think it right that a French general... should be sent to remedy the faults of others...[The implication is that the militia officers were refusing to be subordinate to Humbert, and that they considered Morgan to continue to be the Commanding Officer.] Happily, during this discussion, the enemy, as I have observed, thought it prudent to retreat, which they did that night and next morning.'[86]
21. ^ 'An advanced battery in our front was thrown up during the night about 800 yards from the enemy's line.'[95]
22. ^ Contains despatch from Jackson to Secretary of War dated January 9. 'The loss which the enemy sustained on this occasion, cannot be estimated at less than 1500 in killed, wounded and prisoners. Upwards of three hundred have already been delivered over for burial.... We have taken about 500 prisoners, upwards of 300 of whom are wounded, and a great part of them mortally.'[108]
23. ^ Brannan contains despatch from Hayne to Jackson dated January 13. 'Prisoners taken - Prisoners taken - One major, 4 captains, 11 lieutenants, 1 ensign, 483 camp followers and privates'[109]
24. ^ Major McDougall, the aide-de-camp to Pakenham testified at the court martial on Mullins. 'It is my opinion, that the whole confusion of the column proceeded from the original defective formation of the 44h; the fall of Sir edward Pakenham deprived the column of its best chance of success; and, had the column moved forward according to order, the enemy's lines would have been carried with little loss.'[115]
25. ^ Roosevelt dismissively summarized the engagement in one sentence: "At the same time [as the British Army's withdrawal from New Orleans], a squadron of vessels, which had been unsuccessfully bombarding Fort Saint Philip for a week or two, and had been finally driven off when the fort got [the ammunition for] a mortar large enough to reach them with, also returned; and the whole fleet [thereafter] set sail for Mobile."[123]
26. ^ 'A British squadron appeared in the river below Fort St. Philip, Two bomb-vessels, under the protection of a sloop, a brig, and a schooner, bombarded the fort without effect until January 18, when they withdrew.'[124]
27. ^ Despatch from Jackson to Secretary of War dated January 19. "Last night at 12 o'clock, the enemy precipitately decamped and returned to their boats, leaving behind him, under medical attendance, eighty of his wounded including two officers, 14 pieces of his heavy artillery and a quantity of shot... Such was the situation of the ground he abandoned, and of that through which he returned, protected by canals, redoubts, entrenchments and swamps on his right, and the river on his left, that I could not, without encountering a risk which true policy did not seem to require, or to authorize, attempt to annoy him much on his retreat ... [I am of] the belief that Louisiana is now clear of its enemy."[127]
28. ^ Marker inscription, 'Named for Ignace Francois Martin de Lino de Chalmet (1755-1815), veteran of the American Revolution. Attained the rank of captain of infantry in the Spanish Army; retired about 1794. Purchased plantations below New Orleans and began acquisition of properties in 1805, which would become the Chalmette Plantation stretching 22 arpents along the Mississippi River; main house, sugar mill and almost all out buildings destroyed in the Battle of New Orleans. Decisive engagement on January 8, 1815. Erected by: St. Bernard Tourist Commission.'[128]
29. ^ Per Lambert, "While Napoleon remained in power, few British soldiers could be spared for North America. Wellington was always looking for more manpower."[134]
30. ^ Quoting from Butler's "report of the killed, wounded and missing" to Brigadier General Parker dated January 16, reproduced in the appendices.[137]
31. ^ An aggregation of totals for four casualty returns shows 386 killed, 1,516 wounded, and 552 missing. Casualty returns within Stovin's reports[138] James states 385 killed, 1,516 wounded, and 591 missing, 39 light dragoons in a boat being added to the missing.[137]
32. ^ Within Monthly Return, January 1815.[40]
33. ^ Within Monthly Return, December 1814[40] to 4,868 soldiers of the original force, bolstered by 681 and 785 soldiers of the 7th Foot and 43rd Foot respectively.[note 32] More than 600 prisoners of war were released from Jackson's captivity by March 1815.[139] Bassett contains a letter from Jackson to Colonel Hays dated February 4. "After the exchange is compleated [sic], there will remain between three and four hundred Prisoners in my hands".[140]
34. ^ This plays into a common, now debunked, myth of both Minutemen and the organized colonial militias of New England that frequently portray them as untrained farmers who brought their own weapons to battle. As Gen. Galvin and other historians have proven, the Minutemen tended to get more training in line tactics and drill than the regular militia with some, through the efforts of their commanders ensuring their companies were well-armed. For example, Captain Isaac Davis, a gunsmith, trained his men in musketry and drill on his farm, also making sure that every man had a good musket, cartridge box, canteen, and bayonet.[162]
35. ^ A database search between January 1st and December 31st 1833 does not fetch the rebuttal signed by Blakeney et al.[187] Meanwhile, in a letter from Stuart to Lambert dated August 24, 1833, "I have no other way of making the important information contained in your [rebuttal] communication generally known, than by sending it for insertion; in the public journals, and by requesting one of my friends at New York to have it inserted in newspapers published there and at Washington."[188] In 1852, Ingersoll wrote, "In 1833, all the surviving British commanders... deemed it proper to publish, in an English journal [their rebuttal]."[189] Which journal is not stated. A Scottish journal. Edinburgh Evening Courant, is the most likely.
36. ^ "Six extracts [taken in October 1833 from: New York journal of Commerce, New York Gazette and General Advertiser, Philadelphia Commercial Herald, New York Commercial Advertiser, New York American, New York Albion]..the Watchword... had been universally believed in the United States of America for eighteen years; and also shewing the good spirit with which the complete refutation of the statement had been received in America."[193]

### Citations

[edit]

1. ^ a b Remini (1999), p. 136.
2. ^ Gordon (2018).
3. ^ Eley (2020).
4. ^ a b c d ABT, New Orleans (2018).
5. ^ a b Remini (1977), p. 285.
6. ^ James (1818), p. 563.
7. ^ a b c d Remini (1999), p. 195.
8. ^ Kessler (2010).
9. ^ McLemore (2016), p. 3.
10. ^ Lorusso (2019).
11. ^ a b Grodzinski (2011), p. 1.
12. ^ Lambert (2012), p. 342.
13. ^ Smith (2008), p. 89.
14. ^ Vergun (2015).
15. ^ Bathurst (2006).
16. ^ Carr 1979, p. 273–282; Eustace 2012, p. 293; Latimer 2007, pp. 401–402.
17. ^ British Foreign Policy Documents, p. 495.
18. ^ a b Roosevelt (1900), p. 73.
19. ^ Hickey (1989), p. 208; Roosevelt (1900), p. 77.
20. ^ Brown (1969), p. 81; Daughan (2011), p. 381; Smith (2000), p. 30.
21. ^ Reilly (1976), pp. 228–229.
22. ^ Brown (1969), pp. 81–82.
23. ^ a b c d Daughan (2011), p. 381.
24. ^ a b c Lambert (2012), p. 344.
25. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 221.
26. ^ a b Reilly (1976), p. 226.
27. ^ Daughan (2011), p. 379.
28. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 273.
29. ^ Lossing (1868), p. 1032.
30. ^ Remini (1999), p. 62–64.
31. ^ Quimby (1997), p. 836.
32. ^ Remini (1977), p. 262.
33. ^ Bunner 1855, p. 220; Remini 1977, p. 262.
34. ^ Arthur (1915), p. 97.
35. ^ coololdphotos, 1815 Plan of the City (2018).
36. ^ Quimby (1997), p. 843.
37. ^ James (1818), p. 535.
38. ^ Keane (1815), pp. 439–440.
39. ^ Brannan (1823), pp. 457–458.
40. ^ a b c d Bamford (2014).
41. ^ Quimby (1997), p. 852.
42. ^ Quimby (1997), pp. 852–853.
43. ^ Groom (2006), pp. 145–147.
44. ^ Dale (2015), pp. 97–101.
45. ^ Patterson (2008), pp. 214–215.
46. ^ Patterson (2008), pp. 215–216.
47. ^ Remini (1999), p. 74.
48. ^ Smythies (1894), pp. 172–175.
49. ^ Davis (2019), pp. 162–165; Porter (1889), p. 361.
50. ^ Levinge (2009), p. 220.
51. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 320.
52. ^ Porter (1889), p. 362.
53. ^ Forrest (1961), p. 40-42.
54. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 286.
55. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 289.
56. ^ Davis (2019), p. 239-241.
57. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1011-1015.
58. ^ Reilly (1976), pp. 288–289.
59. ^ a b c Porter (1889), p. 361.
60. ^ a b c d Thornton (1815), pp. 440–441.
61. ^ Patterson (2008), p. 236.
62. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 323.
63. ^ Brown (1969), p. 152; Hickey (1989), p. 211.
64. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 340.
65. ^ Duncan (1873), p. 405-406.
66. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1014-1015,1018-1019.
67. ^ Lambert (1815), pp. 442–443.
68. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1002-1006.
69. ^ Admiralty (1814), p. 145.
70. ^ a b Reilly (1976), pp. 293–294.
71. ^ Remini (1999), pp. 134, 158.
72. ^ Patterson (2008), p. 230.
73. ^ Hickey (1989), p. 211.
74. ^ a b Reilly (1976), p. 298.
75. ^ Reilly (1976), pp. 302–303.
76. ^ a b Latour (1999), p. cxxxii.
77. ^ a b Reilly (1976), p. 307.
78. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1005; Parton (1861), p. 217.
79. ^ Brown (1969), p. 156.
80. ^ Bassett (1911), p. 143; Greene (2009), p. 159; Tatum (1922), p. 130.
81. ^ a b c d Reilly (1976), p. 305.
82. ^ Patterson (2008), p. 253; Thornton (1815), pp. 440–441.
83. ^ Porter (1889), p. 363.
84. ^ Davis (2019), p. 273.
85. ^ Latour (1999), p. lxii.
86. ^ Latour (1999), p. 175-176.
87. ^ a b Brown (1969), p. 157.
88. ^ a b Roosevelt (1900), p. 232.
89. ^ Owsley (2000), p. 164.
90. ^ a b Davis (2019), p. 200.
91. ^ a b Davis (2019), p. 224-225.
92. ^ Davis (2019), p. 225-226.
93. ^ Davis (2019), p. 226.
94. ^ James (1818), p. 374-375.
95. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1004.
96. ^ Gleig (1840), p. 339.
97. ^ Davis (2019), p. 232-237.
98. ^ a b c Reilly (1976), p. 299.
99. ^ Davis (2019), p. 238-239.
100. ^ a b Reilly (1976), p. 300.
101. ^ Gleig (1840), pp. 344–345; Stuart (1834), pp. 95–98.
102. ^ Dale (2015), pp. 160, 191; Davis (2019), p. 269; Reilly (1976), p. 291.
103. ^ Hughes & Brodine (2023), p. 1020.
104. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 296.
105. ^ Owsley (2000), p. 161.
106. ^ Tatum (1922), p. 130.
107. ^ Davis (2019), p. 278.
108. ^ James (1818), pp. 557–559.
109. ^ Brannan (1823), p. 459.
110. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 332.
111. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 335.
112. ^ Horsman (1969), p. 244.
113. ^ Ritchie (1969), p. 10.
114. ^ Stoltz (2017), p. 12.
115. ^ Gleig (1840), p. 344.
116. ^ Davis (2019), pp. 255–256; Porter (1889), p. 363.
117. ^ Davis (2019), p. 223.
118. ^ NPS Alexander Cochrane (2007).
119. ^ Holmes (2003), pp. 206–207.
120. ^ Patterson (2008), p. 265.
121. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 288.
122. ^ a b Reilly (1976), p. 321.
123. ^ Roosevelt (1900), p. 237.
124. ^ Adams (1904), p. 383.
125. ^ James (1818), pp. 459–460.
126. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 340; Latour (1999).
127. ^ James (1818), p. 563-564.
128. ^ HMDb, Chalmette Plantation (2016).
129. ^ James (1818), pp. 387–388.
130. ^ Gleig (1827), p. 184–192.
131. ^ James (1818), p. 391.
132. ^ Fraser & Laughton (1930), p. 297.
133. ^ Carr (1979), p. 273–282; Mills (1921), p. 19-32.
134. ^ Lambert (2012), p. 381.
135. ^ Brannan (1823), p. 477-480; Coleman (1885), p. 177.
136. ^ Brannan (1823), p. 477-480; Bunner (1855), p. 231.
137. ^ a b James (1818), p. 388.
138. ^ Stovin (1815), pp. 443–448.
139. ^ Hollick (2021).
140. ^ Bassett (1911), p. 157.
141. ^ Reilly (1976), p. 301.
142. ^ Davis (2019), p. 277.
143. ^ Carr (1979), p. 273–282; Howe (2007), p. 16.
144. ^ Abernethy (1961), pp. 389–390.
145. ^ Cavell (2022).
146. ^ Davis (2019), p. 15.
147. ^ Warshauer (2013), p. 79–92.
148. ^ Ward (1962), pp. 4–5.
149. ^ a b Stoltz (2012), pp. 112–127.
150. ^ Donning Co-NPS, The War of 1812 (2013), p. 147.
151. ^ Stoltz (2017), p. 147.
152. ^ Bickham (2017).
153. ^ Benn (2002), pp. 82–83.
154. ^ Eustace (2012), p. 293.
155. ^ Eustace (2012), p. 212.
156. ^ Taylor (2010), p. 421.
157. ^ Taylor (2010), p. 437.
158. ^ Stoltz (2017), p. 15.
159. ^ Hickey (2006), p. 347.
160. ^ Hickey (2006), p. 348.
161. ^ a b Stoltz (2017), p. 27.
162. ^ Galvin (1989), p. 149.
163. ^ Davis (2019), p. 197.
164. ^ Buell (1904), p. 423.
165. ^ Buell (1904), p. 40-42.
166. ^ Remini (1999), p. 146.
167. ^ Ritchie (1969), p. 13.
168. ^ a b Owsley (2000), pp. 163–164.
169. ^ Stoltz (2017), p. viii.
170. ^ a b NPS Americans Celebrate an Idealized Version of Their Militia (2015).
171. ^ Davis (2019), p. 316; Reilly (1976), p. 307; Stoltz (2017), p. 25.
172. ^ Stoltz (2017), p. 47.
173. ^ Ritchie (1969), p. 8.
174. ^ History Channel 6 Myths About the Battle of New Orleans (2015).
175. ^ Davis (2019), pp. 316–320.
176. ^ KYANG, The Legend of Kentucky's Lone Marksman (2019).
177. ^ Markgraf (2015).
178. ^ Cummings (2023).
179. ^ a b Poindexter (1815), pp. 58–59.
180. ^ Eustace (2012), pp. 213–215.
181. ^ a b Eustace (2012), p. 215.
182. ^ Eustace (2012), pp. 216, 220.
183. ^ Eustace (2012), p. 229.
184. ^ Eaton (1828), p. 293.
185. ^ a b Stuart (1833), pp. 142–143.
186. ^ Arthur (1915), p. 216; Parton (1861), p. 225.
187. ^ Gale, The Times Digital Archive (1982).
188. ^ Stuart (1834), p. 105.
189. ^ Ingersoll (1852), p. 241.
190. ^ Niles et al. (1834), p. 121.
191. ^ Stuart (1834), pp. 102–104.
192. ^ Stuart (1834), pp. 3–5.
193. ^ Stuart (1834), pp. 106–108.
194. ^ Stuart (1834), pp. 107–108.
195. ^ Eustace (2012), p. 230.
196. ^ LOC, Sir Charles B. Vaughan to Andrew Jackson (2021).
197. ^ Arthur (1915), p. 216.
198. ^ Nolte (1934), p. 220.
199. ^ Read the Plaque, Denis de La Ronde Site (2023).
200. ^ Morison (1968), p. 38-54, 166.
201. ^ Howe (2007), p. 61, 90.
202. ^ Urquhart (1959), p. 12.
203. ^ HMDb, Chalmette Monument Marker (2016).
204. ^ Imperial War Museums, Major General The Hon Sir E Pakenham and Major General S Gibbs (2021).

### Sources

[edit]

* Abernethy, Thomas Perkins (1961). The South in the New Nation, 1789–1819. A History of the South. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-0004-2. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
* Adams, Henry (1904) [1890]. History of the United States of America during the Administration of James Madison. Vol. 8\. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons. Retrieved April 21, 2024. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Admiralty, Royal Navy (1814). The Navy List, Corrected to the end of January 1815, pg 72. London, UK: John Murray for HM Stationery Office. Retrieved January 4, 2013. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* "New Orleans". American Battlefield Trust. January 31, 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2018.
* Arthur, Stanley Clisby (1915). The story of the Battle of New Orleans. New Orleans, LA: Louisiana Historical Society. OCLC 493033588. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Bamford, Andrew (May 2014). "British Army Unit Strengths: 1808-1815 War of 1812 - American Coast". The Napoleon Series. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
* Bassett, John Spencer (1911). The life of Andrew Jackson (pdf). Vol. I. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co. LCCN 11026978. OCLC 1048319133. Retrieved January 31, 2025. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Bathurst, Henry (2006). "One volume of the Outletters of Lord Bathurst, Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, North America, 1814". War of 1812 Documents from the British National Archives microfilm. The Historic New Orleans Collection. Film reel 17, War Office Records, Outletters, North America,1814. WO 6/2. Archived from the original on December 18, 2021. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
* Benn, Carl (2002). The War of 1812. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84176-466-5.
* Bickham, Troy (July 15, 2017). "Should we still care about the War of 1812?". OUPblog. Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 1, 2023.
* Brannan, John, ed. (1823). Official letters of the military and naval officers of the United States: during the war with Great Britain in the years 1812, 13, 14, & 15. Washington, DC: Way & Gideon. OCLC 1083481275. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Brown, Wilburt S (1969). The Amphibious Campaign for West Florida and Louisiana, 1814-1815: A Critical Review of Strategy and Tactics at New Orleans. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. ISBN 978-0-8173-5100-7.
* Buell, Augustus C. (1904). History of Andrew Jackson: Pioneer, Patriot, Soldier, Politician, President (pdf). Vol. I (2016 Reprint ed.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons. ISBN 978-0-7222-8677-7. LCCN 04026228. OCLC 560277327. Retrieved January 31, 2025. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Bunner, E. (1855). History of Louisiana, from Its First Discovery and Settlement to the Present Time. New York: Harper and Bros. OCLC 1046527540. Retrieved September 25, 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Carr, James A. (July 1979). "The Battle of New Orleans and the Treaty of Ghent". Diplomatic History. 3 (3): 273–282\. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.1979.tb00315.x.
* Cavell, Samantha A. (February 2, 2022). "Napoleon and New Orleans: the Emperor's First Surrender and its Impact on Britain in the Last Major Battle of the War of 1812". International Journal of Naval History. 16 (2). Retrieved April 8, 2024.
* Coleman, William Head (1885). Historical sketch book and guide to New Orleans and environs, with map. Illustrated with many original engravings; and containing exhaustive accounts of the traditions, historical legends, and remarkable localities of the Creole city. New York, NY: W. H. Coleman. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* "Rare 1815 Plan of the City and Suburbs of New Orleans". Ghosts of Cities, LLC. March 18, 2015. Archived from the original on May 22, 2020. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
* Cummings, Edward B. (September 2023). "E Pluribus, Unum: The American Battle Line At New Orleans, 8 January 1815". The Army Historical Foundation. Fort Belvoir, VA.
* Dale, Matthew B. (2015). The Staff Ride Handbook for The Battles of New Orleans, 23 December 1814 - 8 January 1815 (PDF). Staff Ride Handbooks & Atlases. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-940804-26-2. Retrieved July 24, 2021. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Daughan, George C. (2011). 1812: The Navy's War. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02046-1.
* Davis, William C. (2019). The Greatest Fury: The Battle of New Orleans and the Rebirth of America. London, UK: Dutton Caliber, an imprint of Penguin Random House. ISBN 978-0-39-958522-7.
* The War of 1812: official National Park Service handbook. Virginia Beach, VA: Donning Co. Publishers. 2013. ISBN 978-1-57864-763-7.
* Duncan, Francis (1873). History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery, Vol. 2. London: John Murray. OCLC 1113269120. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Eaton, John Henry (1828) [1817]. The life of Andrew Jackson. Boston, MA: Ewer. OCLC 285127706. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Eley, Anthony (December 21, 2020). "Pushmataha". National Museum of the United States Army. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
* Eustace, Nicole (2012). 1812: War and the Passions of Patriotism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-465-02046-1.
* Forrest, Charles Ramus (1961). The Battle of New Orleans: a British view; the journal of Major C.R. Forrest; Asst. QM General, 34th. Regiment of Foot. A Parchment book. New Orleans, LA: Hauser Press. OCLC 1253280.
* Fraser, Edward; Laughton, L. G. Carr (1930). The Royal Marine Artillery, 1804–1859. The Royal Marine Artillery 1804–1923. Vol. I. London, UK: The Royal United Services Institute. OCLC 4986867.
* "The Times Digital Archive". The Times. June 15, 1982. Retrieved January 20, 2023 – via Gale Primary Sources.
* Galvin, John R. (1989). The Minute Men: The First Fight: Myths and Realities of the American Revolution (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey's International Defense Publisher. ISBN 978-1-57488-049-6. OCLC 621630025. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
* Gleig, George Robert (1827). The Campaigns of the British Army at Washington and New Orleans, 1814–1815. London, UK: J. Murray. ISBN 0-665-45385-X. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
* Gleig, George Robert (1840). "Recollections of the Expedition to the Chesapeake, and against New Orleans, by an Old Sub". The United Service Magazine. H. Colburn. Retrieved February 3, 2008. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Gordon, Skyler (January 4, 2018). "Enslaved Soldiers and the Battle of New Orleans". Tennessee Historical Society. Retrieved January 31, 2025.
* Greene, Jerome (2009). "Part 1" (PDF). The New Orleans Campaign of 1814-1815 in Relation to the Chalmette Battlefield. Historical and Archeological Investigations at the Chalmette Battlefield. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
* Grodzinski, John, ed. (September 2011). "Instructions to Major-General Sir Edward Pakenham for the New Orleans Campaign". The War of 1812 Magazine (16).
* Groom, Winston (2006). Patriotic Fire: Andrew Jackson and Jean Laffite at the Battle of New Orleans. A Borzoi book. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-1-4000-4436-8.
* Hickey, Donald R. (1989). The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-01613-0.
* Hickey, Donald R. (2006). Don't Give Up the Ship! Myths of the War of 1812. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-03179-2.
* "6 Myths About the Battle of New Orleans". The History Channel, A&E Networks. MYTH #5: Kentucky Riflemen Were Responsible for the American Victory. January 8, 2015.
* "Chalmette Plantation Historical Marker". The Historical Marker Database. August 23, 2016. Retrieved April 6, 2024.
* "Chalmette Monument Marker". The Historical Marker Database. August 23, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2021.
* Holmes, Richard (2003). Wellington: The Iron Duke (pdf) (1st ed.). London, UK: Harper and Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-713750-3. OCLC 768489372. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
* Hollick, Keith (December 27, 2021). "POWs returned by General Andrew Jackson in 1815, a transcription". napoleonicwars. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
* Horsman, Reginald (1969). The War of 1812. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-39-445105-3. LCCN 68023941.
* Howe, Daniel Walker (2007). What hath God wrought: The transformation of America, 1815-1848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507894-7.
* Hughes, Christine F.; Brodine, Charles E., eds. (2023). The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History, Vol. 4 (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center (GPO). ISBN 978-1-943604-36-4.
* Ingersoll, Charles Jared (1852). History of the Second War Between the United States of America and Great Britain. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo & Company. OCLC 1738412. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* "Major General The Hon Sir E Pakenham and Major General S Gibbs". Imperial War Museums. 2021. Retrieved July 27, 2021.
* James, William (1818). A full and correct account of the military occurrences of the late war between Great Britain and the United States of America; with an appendix, and plates. Vol. II. London: Black et al. ISBN 0-665-35743-5. OCLC 2226903. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Keane, John (March 9, 1815). "Report of Maj. Gen. John Keane, Commanding, December 26, 1814" (pdf). London Gazette. No. 16991\. London, UK. pp. 439–440.
* "The Legend of Kentucky's Lone Marksman at the Battle of New Orleans". Kentucky National Guard. January 8, 2019. Retrieved October 12, 2024.
* Kessler, Benjamin (October 31, 2010). Caryl, Sue (ed.). "The Battle of New Orleans". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved July 10, 2018.
* Lambert, Andrew (2012). The Challenge: Britain Against America in the Naval War of 1812. London: Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-27319-5.
* Lambert, John (March 9, 1815). "Report of Maj. Gen. John Lambert, January 28, 1815" (pdf). London Gazette. No. 16991\. London, UK. pp. 442–443. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Latimer, Jon (2007). 1812: War with America. Cambridge: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-02584-4.
* Latour, Arsène Lacarrière (1999) [1816]. Historical Memoir of the War in West Florida and Louisiana in 1814–15, with an Atlas. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. ISBN 0-8130-1675-4. OCLC 40119875.
* Levinge, Sir Richard (2009) [1868]. Historical Records of the 43rd Regiment Monmouthshire Light Infantry. Clowes. OCLC 866065464.
* "Image 1 of Letter from Sir Charles B. Vaughan to Andrew Jackson, July 14, 1833". The Library of Congress. June 10, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2023. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Lorusso, Nicholas J. (June 24, 2019). The Battle of New Orleans: Joint Strategic and Operational Planning Lessons Learned (Joint Professional Military Education Phase II dissertation thesis). Norfolk, VA: Joint Forces Staff College. Archived from the original on June 24, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2021.
* Lossing, Benson John (1868). The Pictorial Field-Book of the War of 1812 (pdf) (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers, Publishers. LCCN 17011268. OCLC 1157056965. Retrieved February 23, 2019. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Markgraf, Matt (January 6, 2015). "Remarkable Kentuckians: The Sharpshooter That Broke the British in New Orleans". WKMS - Murray State's NPR Station. Murray, KY: Murray State University. Retrieved October 12, 2024.
* McLemore, Laura Lyons (2016). The Battle of New Orleans in History and Memory (pdf) (1st ed.). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 978-0-80-716466-2. LCCN 2016017096. OCLC 966846185. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
* Mills, Dudley (1921). "The Duke of Wellington and the Peace Negotiations at Ghent in 1814". Canadian Historical Review. 2 (1): 19–32\. doi:10.3138/chr-02-01-02. S2CID 161278429. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Morison, Samuel Eliot (1968). "Our Most Unpopular War". Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society. 80: 38–54, 166. JSTOR 25080655.
* Niles, H.; Niles, W.O.; Hughes, J.; Beatty, G. (1834). "Niles' National Register". No. v. 45. p. 121. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* "Alexander Cochrane". nps.gov. U.S. National Park Service. January 19, 2007. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
* "Americans Celebrate an Idealized Version of Their Militia". nps.gov. U.S. National Park Service. April 29, 2015. Retrieved May 13, 2024.
* Nolte, Vincent (1934) [1854]. Fifty years in both hemispheres; or, Reminiscences of the life of a former merchant. Translated from the German. New York: G.H. Watt. OCLC 654788754. Retrieved January 21, 2023. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Owsley, Frank (2000) [1981]. Struggle for the Gulf borderlands: the Creek War and the battle of New Orleans 1812–1815 (PDF) (2nd ed.). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. ISBN 978-0-81-731062-2.
* Parton, James (1861). Life of Andrew Jackson Volume II. New York: Mason Brothers. OCLC 481044356. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Patterson, Benton Rain (2008). The Generals, Andrew Jackson, Sir Edward Pakenham, and the road to New Orleans. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-6717-7.
* Poindexter, George (1815). "From the Mississippi Republican-Extra, New Orleans, January 20th, 1815". Niles's Weekly Register. Vol. 8\. pp. 58–59.
* Porter, Maj Gen Whitworth (1889). History of the Corps of Royal Engineers Vol I. Chatham: The Institution of Royal Engineers. OCLC 35254552.
* Quimby, Robert S. (1997), The U.S. Army in the War of 1812: an operational and command study, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, ISBN 0-87013-441-8, JSTOR 10.14321/j.ctt130hjqq
* "Denis de La Ronde Site". Read the Plaque. 2023. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
* Reilly, Robin (1976) [1974]. The British at the gates – the New Orleans campaign in the War of 1812. London: Cassell. OCLC 839952.
* Remini, Robert V. (1977). Andrew Jackson and the course of American empire, 1767–1821. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-013574-3.
* Remini, Robert V. (1999). The Battle of New Orleans. New York: Penguin Putnam. ISBN 0-670-88551-7.
* Ritchie, Carson I. A., ed. (1961). "The Louisiana Campaign". The Louisiana Historical Quarterly. Publication of the journal of Major C.R. Forrest, and Dickson's "Journal of Operations in Louisiana, 1814-1815" with commentary. 44. OCLC 1029064475.
* Ritchie, Carson I. A. (1969). "The Guns of New Orleans". The History Teacher. 2 (4). Society for History Education: 8–13\. doi:10.2307/3054254. JSTOR 3054254.
* Roosevelt, Theodore (1900). The Naval War of 1812. Vol. II. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Smith, Gene Allen (2000). Thomas ap Catesby Jones. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-848-5.
* Smith, Gene Allen (2008). "Preventing the "Eggs of Insurrection" from Hatching: The U.S. Navy and Control of the Mississippi River, 1806-1815" (PDF). Northern Mariner. issue Nos. 3-4, (July–October 2008). 18 (3–4). The Canadian Nautical Research Society: 79–91\. doi:10.25071/2561-5467.355. S2CID 247349162. Retrieved December 19, 2021.3–4&rft.pages=79-91&rft.date=2008&rft_id=info:doi/10.25071/2561-5467.355&rft_id=https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247349162#id-name=S2CID&rft.aulast=Smith&rft.aufirst=Gene+Allen&rft_id=https://www.cnrs-scrn.org/northern_mariner/vol18/tnm_18_3-4_79-91.pdf&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Battle+of+New+Orleans" class="Z3988">
* Smythies, Captain Raymond R. H. (1894). Historical Records of the 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment. Devonport: A. H. Swiss. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Stoltz, Joseph F. (2012). "'It Taught our Enemies a Lesson': The Battle of New Orleans and the Republican Destruction of the Federalist Party". Tennessee Historical Quarterly. 71 (2): 112–127\. JSTOR 42628249.
* Stoltz, Joseph F. (2017). A Bloodless Victory: The Battle of New Orleans in History and Memory. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. ISBN 978-1-42-142302-9.
* Stovin, Frederick (March 9, 1815). "Report of Lt. Col. Frederick Stovin, January 8, 1815" (pdf). London Gazette. No. 16991\. London, UK. pp. 443–448. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Stuart, James (1833). Three Years in America. London: Whittaker & Co. OCLC 1084240097. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Stuart, James (1834). Refutation of aspersions [by N. Pringle] on "Three Years in North America.". London: Whittaker & Co. OCLC 909227054. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Tatum, Howell (1922). Bassett, John Spencer (ed.). Major Howell Tatum's Journal while Acting Topographical Engineer (1814) to General Jackson, Commanding the Seventh Military District (pdf). Northampton, MA: Department of History of Smith College. LCCN 22016375. OCLC 697990493. Retrieved January 31, 2025. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Taylor, Alan (2010). The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4000-4265-4.
* Thornton, William (March 9, 1815). "Report of Col. W. Thornton, 85th Regiment, January 8, 1815" (pdf). London Gazette. No. 16991\. London, UK. pp. 440–441. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
* Urquhart, Kenneth Trist (March 21, 1959). "Seventy Years of the Louisiana Historical Association" (PDF). Lahistory.org. Alexandria, LA: Louisiana Historical Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2010. Retrieved July 21, 2010.
* Vergun, David (January 9, 2015). "Army Historian Corrects Myths on Battle of New Orleans' 200th Anniversary". Army.mil. U.S. Army. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
* Ward, John William (1962). Andrew Jackson: Symbol for an Age. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-500699-5. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
* Warshauer, Matthew (2013). "Andrew Jackson and the Legacy of the Battle of New Orleans". In Adams, Sean Patrick (ed.). A Companion to the Era of Andrew Jackson. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118290767.ch4. ISBN 978-1-118-29076-7.
* Second Duke of Wellington, ed. (1862). "The Earl of Liverpool to Viscount Castlereagh". Supplementary despatches, correspondence and memoranda of the Duke of Wellington, K. G. Vol. 9\. London: John Murray. OCLC 60466520. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

## Further reading

[edit]

### Books

[edit]

* Borneman, Walter H. (2004), 1812: The War that forged a nation, New York: HarperCollins, ISBN 0-06-053112-6
* Brooks, Charles B. (1961), The Siege of New Orleans, Seattle: University of Washington Press, OCLC 425116
* Caffrey, Kate (1977), The Twilight's Last Gleaming, New York: Stein and Day, ISBN 0-8128-1920-9
* Cooper, John Spencer (1996) [1869], Rough Notes of Seven Campaigns in Portugal, Spain, France and America During the Years 1809–1815, Staplehurst: Spellmount, ISBN 1-873376-65-0
* Hickey, Donald R. Glorious Victory: Andrew Jackson and the Battle of New Orleans (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015). xii, 154 pp.
* Maass, Alfred R (1994), "Brownsville's steamboat Enterprize and Pittsburgh's supply of general Jackson's army", Pittsburgh History, 77: 22–29, ISSN 1069-4706
* Pickles, Tim (1993), New Orleans 1815, Osprey Campaign Series, vol. 28, Osprey Publishing, ISBN 1-84176-150-8, OCLC 52914335.
* Rowland, Eron (1971) [1926], Andrew Jackson's Campaign against the British, or, the Mississippi Territory in the War of 1812, concerning the Military Operations of the Americans, Creek Indians, British, and Spanish, 1813–1815, Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, ISBN 0-8369-5637-0
* Smith, Gene A., ed. (2004). A British eyewitness at the Battle of New Orleans, the memoir of Royal Navy admiral Robert Aitchison, 1808–1827. New Orleans: The Historic New Orleans Collection. ISBN 0-917860-50-0.
* Smith, Sir Harry (1903). The autobiography of Lieutenant-General Sir Harry Smith: Baronet of Aliwal on the Sutlej, G.C.B. edited, with the addition of some supplementary chapters, by G.C. Moore Smith. London: John Murray. OCLC 4960058 – via University of Pennsylvania.
* Stanley, George F. G. (1983), The War of 1812 – Land Operations, MacMillan & National Museum of Canada
* Stoltz, Joseph F. (2014). The Gulf Theater, 1813-1815 (PDF). Center of Military History. OCLC 906028765.

### Online

[edit]

* "Battle of New Orleans". Living Louisiana. Cox. February 20, 2010. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2018 – via YouTube.
* "The Battle of New Orleans: 197th Anniversary – January 6-8, 2012 – Chalmette, La". Louisiana Hometown Network. December 19, 2011. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2018 – via YouTube.
* "The Battle of New Orleans". Louisiana State Exhibit Museum. Retrieved July 8, 2018.
* "The Battle of New Orleans – Popular Myths and Legends; And a Few Others Thrown in as well!". 93rd Sutherland Highland Regiment of Foot Living History Unit. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
* Bradshaw, Jim (July 28, 2011). "Battle of New Orleans". In Johnson, David (ed.). Encyclopedia of Louisiana. New Orleans, Louisiana: Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
* Gayarré, Charles (1867). "Chapter X: 1814‑1815". History of Louisiana. New York: William J. Widdleton. pp. 441–510.
* Kendall, John (1922). "Chapter VI: The Battle of New Orleans". History of New Orleans. Chicago and New York: The Lewis Publishing Company. pp. 91–109.
* King, Grace (1926). "Chapter XI: The Glorious Eighth of January". New Orleans: The Place and the People. New York: The Macmillan Company. pp. 211–251.
* Latour, Major A. Lacarriere (1912). "Historical Memoir of the War in West Florida and Louisiana in 1814-15". Louisiana Historical Quarterly. Louisiana Historical Society. pp. 143–153.
* Roosevelt, Theodore (1912). "The Battle of New Orleans". In Halsey, Francis W. (ed.). Great Epochs in American History: Described by Famous Writers from Columbus to Roosevelt. New York and London: Funk & Wagnalls Company. pp. 102–112\. OCLC 599099.
* Williams, Walter (May 17, 2012). "The Battle of New Orleans". Dreamsite Productions. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2018 – via YouTube.
* Zimmerman, Thomas (2009). "The Battle of New Orleans, December 1814 – January 8, 1815". BattleofNewOrleans.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved July 8, 2018.

* v
* t
* e

Conflicts of the War of 1812

Battles of the War of 1812
Timeline of the War of 1812

United States|

| Delaware|

* Lewes

|

District of Columbia|

* Washington

Georgia|

* Fort Peter

Louisiana|

* New Orleans
* Fort St. Philip

Maryland|

* Havre de Grace
* St. Michaels
* Bladensburg
* Caulk's Field
* North Point
* Baltimore

Maine|

* Hampden

New York|

* Big Sandy Creek
* Buffalo
* Ogdensburg
* Plattsburgh
* Niagara
* Black Rock
* Sacket's Harbor

North Carolina|

* Ocracoke

Ohio|

* Stephenson
* Copus
* Meigs

Virginia|

* Rappahannock
* Craney Island
* Chesconessex Creek
* Alexandria
* Farnham Church

U.S. territories|

| Illinois|

* Dearborn
* Rock Island Rapids
* Prairie du Chien

|

Indiana|

* Mississinewa
* Tippecanoe
* Wild Cat Creek
* Harrison
* Wayne

Michigan|

* Brownstown
* Frenchtown
* Mackinac Island
* Maguaga
* Detroit
* Mackinac

Mississippi|

* Bashi
* Autossee
* Burnt Corn
* Callabee Creek
* Canoe Fight
* Holy Ground
* Horseshoe Bend
* Talladega
* Tallushatchee
* Emuckfaw and Enotachopo Creek
* Fort Bowyer
* Mims
* Sinquefield

Missouri|

* Credit Island
* Sink Hole

British Empire|

| Lower Canada|

* Chateauguay
* 1st Lacolle Mills
* 2nd Lacolle Mills

|

Upper Canada|

* Beaver Dams
* Chippawa
* Cook's Mills
* Crysler's Farm
* George
* Frenchman's Creek
* Longwoods
* Lundy's Lane
* Malcolm's Mills
* Queenston Heights
* Stoney Creek
* Thames
* York
* 1st Erie
* Elizabethtown
* Port Dover
* Gananoque
* 2nd Erie

Spanish Empire|

| Florida|

* Pensacola

|

Naval battles|

| Atlantic Ocean|

* HMS Boxer
* HMS Cyane
* HMS Epervier
* HMS Frolic
* HMS Penguin
* HMS Dominica
* USS Argus
* USS Chesapeake
* USS President
* Chesapeake Bay Flotilla
* USS Constitution vs HMS Java
* HMS Avon
* Fayal
* HMS Peacock
* HMS Reindeer
* USS Constitution vs HMS Guerriere
* USS United States vs HMS Macedonian

|

Caribbean Sea|

* La Guaira

Great Lakes|

* Lake Erie
* Oswego
* Lake Huron
* Lake Ontario
* Sacket's Harbor

Gulf Coast|

* Lake Borgne

Pacific Ocean|

* James Island
* Charles Island
* Nuku Hiva
* Valparaiso

See also: American Indian Wars, Creek War, Napoleonic Wars, and Tecumseh's War

* Category

*  definition
*  textbooks
*  quotes
*  source texts
*  media
*  news stories

* v
* t
* e

War of 1812

Timeline

Origins|

* Chesapeake–Leopard affair
* Orders in Council (1807)
* Embargo Act of 1807
* Non-Intercourse Act (1809)
* Macon's Bill Number 2
* Tecumseh's War
* Henry letters
* War hawks
* Rule of 1756
* Monroe–Pinkney Treaty
* Little Belt affair
* Assassination of Spencer Perceval
* Declaration of war

Theaters and
campaigns|

* Northwestern
* Chesapeake
* Gulf

Major battles|

* Queenston Heights
* Spur's Defeat
* Frenchtown
* Beaver Dams
* Thames
* Chateauguay
* Crysler's Farm
* Chippawa
* Lundy's Lane
* Bladensburg
* McHenry
* New Orleans

Involvement|

* Illinois Territory
* Indiana Territory
* Kentucky
* North Carolina
* Ohio

Leaders|

* Isaac Brock
* William Henry Harrison
* Andrew Jackson
* James Madison
* Edward Pakenham
* Robert Ross
* Lord Liverpool
* Winfield Scott
* Tecumseh

Completion|

* Treaty of Ghent

Aftermath|

* The Eighth
* General Society of the War of 1812
* Military Society of the War of 1812
* United States Daughters of 1812
* War of 1812 Bicentennial

Legacy|

* "The Star-Spangled Banner"
* Brock's Monument (1836)
* Equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson (1852)
* Fountain of Time (1920 sculpture)
* Laura Secord Legacy Trail
* Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail
* Peace Bridge
* Perry's Victory and International Peace Memorial
* "The Battle of New Orleans" (song)

Related|

* Bibliography
* Creek War
* Napoleonic Wars
* "The Bold Canadian"
* "The Hunters of Kentucky"
* Opposition in Britain
* Opposition in the United States

* Category
* Commons

* v
* t
* e

Andrew Jackson

* 7th President of the United States (1829–1837)
* Senator from Tennessee (1797–1798, 1823–1825)
* Federal Military Commissioner of Florida (1821)
* U.S. Representative for Tennessee at-large (1796–1797)

Life|

* Slave trading
* Land speculation
* Horse racing
* Violent incidents
* Fatal duel
* Legal affairs
* Plantations:
* Poplar Grove
* Hunter's Hill
* The Hermitage

Military and
diplomatic|

* 1813–14: Natchez Expedition
* Creek War
* Fort Strother
* Battle of Talladega
* Battles of Emuckfaw and Enotachopo Creek
* Battle of Horseshoe Bend
* Treaty of Fort Jackson
* 1814–15: Southern theater of the War of 1812
* Battle of Pensacola
* Arrest of Hall and Louaillier
* Battle of New Orleans
* 1816: Jackson's Military Road
* Battle of Negro Fort
* Treaty of Turkeytown
* 1818: Treaty of Tuscaloosa
* Salt Lick Reserve
* Jackson Purchase
* 1818: First Seminole War
* Arbuthnot and Ambrister incident
* 1819: Adams–Onís Treaty
* Congressional investigation of Seminole War
* 1820: Treaty of Doak's Stand
* 1823: Treaty of Moultrie Creek

Presidency|

* First inauguration
* Second inauguration
* State of the Union
* 1829
* 1830
* 1831
* 1832
* 1833
* 1834
* 1835
* 1836
* Judicial appointments
* Taney Court
* Executive actions
* Vetoes
* Pardons
* Foreign policy
* First Sumatran expedition
* Snow Riot
* Assassination attempt
* Governance: Spoils system
* Swartwout–Hoyt scandal
* Petticoat affair
* Kitchen Cabinet
* Indian policy: Indian removal
* Indian Removal Act
* Trail of Tears
* Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek
* Treaty of New Echota
* Treaty of Pontotoc Creek
* Treaty of Payne's Landing
* Treaty of Chicago
* Treaty of Cusseta
* Black Hawk War
* Second Creek War
* Second Seminole War
* Supreme Court decisions: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
* Worcester v. Georgia
* Economic policy: Bank War
* Senate censure
* Banking in the Jacksonian Era
* Hard money
* Specie Circular
* Maysville Road veto
* Nullification crisis
* Tariff of 1832
* Ordinance of Nullification
* Proclamation to the People of South Carolina
* Force Bill
* Tariff of 1833
* Pet banks
* Panic of 1837

Politics|

* 1824 United States presidential election
* "Corrupt Bargain"
* 1828 United States presidential election
* 1828 Jackson campaign
* Coffin Handbills
* 1832 United States presidential election
* 1832 Democratic National Convention
* Establishment of the U.S. Democratic Party
* History of the U.S. Whig Party
* Anti-Jacksonian Party

Slavery|

* Jackson and slavery
* Gilbert
* Alfred Jackson
* Hannah Jackson

Public image|

* List of memorials to Andrew Jackson
* January 8 (holiday)
* "Half Horse and Half Alligator"
* "King Andrew the First" (1832)
* Portraits of Andrew Jackson
* Equestrian statue in Washington, D.C., and New Orleans
* Jackson, Mississippi statue
* U.S. Capitol statue
* Films about Andrew Jackson
* Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson
* U.S. military vessels named after Jackson
* Jackson Square (New Orleans)
* Andrew Jackson State Park (South Carolina)
* Andrew Jackson Centre (Ireland)
* Jefferson–Jackson Dinner
* Black Jack stamp
* USD$20
* Jackson on other U.S. currency
* Confederate States dollar

Historiography|

* Jacksonian democracy
* Bibliography of Andrew Jackson
* The Age of Jackson
* Robert V. Remini § Andrew Jackson
* American Lion

Family|

* Rachel Jackson
* Marriage controversy
* Donelson family
* Andrew Jackson Jr.
* Acting First Ladies: Emily Donelson
* Sarah Yorke Jackson
* Wards:
* Edward G. W. Butler
* Andrew Jackson Donelson
* Daniel Smith Donelson
* A. J. Hutchings
* Indigenous "adoptees":
* Theodore
* Charley
* Lyncoya Jackson
* Poll (parrot)

* ← John Quincy Adams
* Martin Van Buren →

* Category

* v
* t
* e

Piracy

Periods|

* Ancient Mediterranean
* Golden Age
* 21st century
* 2022
* 2023
* 2024

Types of pirate|

* Albanian piracy
* Anglo-Turkish piracy
* Baltic Slavic pirates
* Barbary pirates (corsairs)
* Algiers
* Brethren of the Coast
* Buccaneers
* Cilician pirates
* Child pirate
* Cossack pirates
* Filibusters
* French corsairs
* Jewish pirates
* Moro pirates
* Narentines
* Privateers
* Confederate
* River pirate
* Sea Beggars
* Sea Dogs
* Sindhi corsairs
* Timber pirate
* Ushkuyniks
* Uskoks
* Vikings
* Victual Brothers
* Wokou
* Women in piracy

Areas|

| Atlantic World|

* Caribbean
* British Virgin Islands
* Spanish Main
* Lake Nicaragua
* Venezuela
* Gulf of Guinea

|

Indian Ocean|

* Horn of Africa
* Somali Coast
* Indonesia
* Persian Gulf
* Strait of Malacca
* Nosy Boraha

Other waters|

* Baltic Slavic piracy
* Barbary Coast
* Falcon Lake
* South China Coast
* Sulu Sea

Pirate havens
and bases|

* Barataria Bay
* Île Sainte-Marie
* Libertatia
* Lundy
* Mamora
* Port Royal
* Republic of Pirates
* Republic of Salé
* Saint Augustin
* Saint-Malo
* Tortuga

Major figures|

| Pirates|

* Abduwali Muse
* Abshir Boyah
* Adam Baldridge
* Abraham Samuel
* Alfhild
* Albert W. Hicks
* Anne Bonny
* Anne Dieu-le-Veut
* António de Faria
* Alexandre Exquemelin
* Artemisia I of Caria
* Bartolomeu Português
* Bartholomew Roberts
* Benito de Soto
* Benjamin Hornigold
* Black Caesar
* Blackbeard
* Bully Hayes
* Cai Qian
* John Rackham
* Charles Gibbs
* Charlotte Badger
* Charlotte de Berry
* Cheung Po Tsai
* Christina Anna Skytte
* Chui A-poo
* Dan Seavey
* Diabolito
* Dido
* Dirk Chivers
* Dominique You
* Edward England
* Edward Low
* Eli Boggs
* Elise Eskilsdotter
* Eustace the Monk
* Flora Burn
* Flying Gang
* Fūma Kotarō
* Francis Drake
* François Le Clerc
* François l'Olonnais
* Gan Ning
* Grace O'Malley
* Hayreddin Barbarossa
* Hendrick Lucifer
* Henri Caesar
* Henry Every
* Henry Morgan
* Henry Strangways
* Hippolyte Bouchard
* Huang Bamei
* Israel Hands
* Jacquotte Delahaye
* Jan Janszoon
* Jean Lafitte
* Jeanne de Clisson
* Johanna Hård
* John Hawkins
* John Hoar
* John Newland Maffitt
* John Pro
* Jørgen Jørgensen
* José Joaquim Almeida
* Joseph Baker
* Joseph Barss
* Klaus Störtebeker
* Lai Choi San
* Laurens de Graaf
* Lawrence Prince
* Liang Daoming
* Limahong
* Lo Hon-cho
* Louis-Michel Aury
* Mansel Alcantra
* Manuel Ribeiro Pardal
* Martin Frobisher
* Mary Critchett
* Mary Lindsey
* Mary Read
* Mary Wolverston
* Michel de Grammont
* Moses Cohen Henriques
* Nathaniel Gordon
* Nicholas van Hoorn
* Ng Akew
* Olivier Levasseur
* Pedro Gilbert
* Peter Easton
* Pierre Lafitte
* Piet Pieterszoon Hein
* Princess Sela
* Rahmah ibn Jabir al-Jalhami
* Rachel Wall
* Redbeard
* Richard Glover
* Robert Culliford
* Robert Surcouf
* Roberto Cofresí
* Roche Braziliano
* Rusla
* Sadie Farrell
* Samuel Bellamy
* Samuel Hall Lord
* Samuel Mason
* Samuel Pallache
* Sayyida al Hurra
* Sister Ping
* Shap-ng-tsai
* Shirahama Kenki
* Simon Mascarino
* Stede Bonnet
* Teuta
* Thomas Cavendish
* Thomas Tew
* Veborg
* Victual Brothers
* Vincenzo Gambi
* Wang Zhi
* William Dampier
* William Kidd
* Zheng Jing
* Zheng Qi
* Zheng Yi
* Zheng Zhilong
* Zheng Yi Sao

|

Pirate
hunters|

* Angelo Emo
* Chaloner Ogle
* David Porter
* Duarte Pacheco Pereira
* James Brooke
* Julius Caesar
* Jose Campuzano-Polanco
* Luis Fajardo
* Miguel Enríquez
* Pedro Menéndez de Avilés
* Pompey
* Richard Avery Hornsby
* Robert Maynard
* Thomas Warren
* Woodes Rogers

Pirate ships|

* Adventure Galley
* Ambrose Light
* Fancy
* Flying Dutchman
* Ganj-i-Sawai
* Queen Anne's Revenge
* Quedagh Merchant
* Marquis of Havana
* My Revenge
* Royal Fortune
* Saladin
* Whydah Gally
* York

Pirate battles and incidents|

* 1582 Cagayan battles
* 1985 Lahad Datu ambush
* Action of 9 November 1822
* Action of 28 October 2007
* Action of 11 November 2008
* Action of 9 April 2009
* Action of 23 March 2010
* Action of 1 April 2010
* Action of 5 April 2010
* Anti-piracy in the Aegean
* Antelope incident
* Anti-piracy in the West Indies
* Attack on Veracruz
* Balanguingui Expedition
* Battle of Boca Teacapan
* Battle of Cape Fear River
* Battle of Cape Lopez
* Battle of Doro Passage
* Battle of Mandab Strait
* Battle of Manila
* Battle off Minicoy Island
* Battle off Mukah
* Battle of Nam Quan
* Battle of New Orleans
* Battle of Ocracoke Inlet
* Battle of Pianosa
* Battle of the Leotung
* Battle of the Tiger's Mouth
* Battle of Tonkin River
* Battle of Ty-ho Bay
* Battle of Tysami
* Beluga Nomination incident
* Blockade of Charleston (Vane)
* Chepo Expedition
* Capture of the Ambrose Light
* Capture of John Rackham
* Capture of the schooner Bravo
* Capture of the schooner Fancy
* Capture of the sloop Anne
* Carré d'As IV incident
* Dai Hong Dan incident
* Falklands Expedition
* Great Lakes Patrol
* Irene incident
* Jiajing wokou raids
* Maersk Alabama hijacking
* MT Zafirah hijacking
* MT Orkim Harmony hijacking
* MV Moscow University hijacking
* North Star affair
* Operation Enduring Freedom – HOA
* Operation Atalanta
* Operation Dawn of Gulf of Aden
* Operation Dawn 8: Gulf of Aden
* Operation Ocean Shield
* Persian Gulf Campaign
* Pirate attacks in Borneo
* Quest incident
* Raid on Cartagena
* Sack of Baltimore
* Sack of Campeche
* Salvador Pirates
* Slave raid of Suðuroy
* Turkish Abductions

Piracy law|

* Acts of grace (1717–1718 Acts of Grace)
* International piracy law
* Letter of marque
* Paris Declaration Respecting Maritime Law
* Piracy Act (1536, 1698, 1717, 1721, 1837, 1850)
* Piracy Law of 1820

Slave trade|

* African slave trade
* African Slave Trade Patrol
* Amistad Incident
* Atlantic slave trade
* Baltic slave trade
* Barbary slave trade
* Blockade of Africa
* Capture of the Veloz Passagera
* Capture of the brig Brillante
* Indian Ocean slave trade
* Trans-Saharan slave trade

Pirates in
popular
culture|

| Fictional pirates|

* Askeladd
* Tom Ayrton
* Barbe Rouge
* Brook
* Captain Birdseye
* Captain Blood
* Captain Crook
* Captain Flint
* Captain Hook
* Captain Nemo
* Captain Pugwash
* Captain Sabertooth
* Captain Stingaree
* Charlotte de Berry
* Davy Jones
* Edward Kenway
* Elaine Marley
* Elizabeth Swann
* Franky
* Guybrush Threepwood
* Hector Barbossa
* Jack Sparrow
* Jacquotte Delahaye
* Jimbei
* José Gaspar
* Joshamee Gibbs
* Long John Silver
* Monkey D. Luffy
* Vaas Montenegro
* Mr. Smee
* Nami
* Nico Robin
* Roronoa Zoro
* Sandokan
* Sanji
* Tony Tony Chopper
* Usopp
* Will Turner
* Yellowbeard
* Zanzibar

|

Novels|

* The Pirate
* The Pilot: A Tale of the Sea
* Treasure Island
* Facing the Flag
* On Stranger Tides
* Jim Hawkins and the Curse of Treasure Island
* Castaways of the Flying Dutchman
* The Angel's Command
* Voyage of Slaves
* Long John Silver
* Pirate Latitudes
* Mistress of the Seas
* Silver: Return to Treasure Island

Tropes|

* Buried treasure
* Davy Jones's locker
* Eyepatch
* Jolly Roger
* skull and crossbones
* Keelhauling
* Marooning
* No purchase, no pay
* Pegleg
* Pet parrot
* Pirate code
* Pirate utopia
* Treasure map
* Walking the plank

Miscellaneous|

* Air pirate
* Space pirate
* International Talk Like a Pirate Day
* Pirates versus Ninjas

Miscellaneous|

* A General History of the Pyrates
* Captain Charles Johnson
* Truce of Ratisbon
* Pirate Round

* Mutiny
* Matelotage
* Piracy kidnappings

Lists|

* Pirates
* Pirate films and TV series
* Privateers
* List of ships attacked by Somali pirates
* Timeline of piracy
* Women in piracy

* Piracy portal
* Category

Portals:

* Louisiana
* Modern history
* Piracy
* United Kingdom

Battle of New Orleans at Wikipedia's sister projects:

* Media from Commons
* Texts from Wikisource

Authority control databases

International|

* FAST

National|

* Germany
* United States
* Spain
* Israel

Other|

* Yale LUX

*[DOW]: Died of wounds
*[WIA]: Wounded in action
*[c.]: circa
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template