Cactoideae

Subfamily of the cactus family, Cactaceae

Cactoideae

Mammillaria elongata
Scientific classification
Kingdom:  | Plantae
Clade:  | Tracheophytes
Clade:  | Angiosperms
Clade:  | Eudicots
Order:  | Caryophyllales
Family:  | Cactaceae
Subfamily:  | Cactoideae
Eaton
Tribes or clades

See text.

The Cactoideae are the largest subfamily of the cactus family, Cactaceae, and are widely distributed throughout the Americas. Cactaceae is the 5th most endangered plant or animal family evaluated globally by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.[1] Around 80% of cactus species belong to this subfamily.[2] The genera of the Cactoideae are characterized by microscopic foliage leaves. All photosynthesis occurs in shoot cortex cells covered by a persistent epidermis and stomata. Another important characteristic of this subfamily is ribbed stems, which enable the inner cortex to expand radially without breaking the shoot surface to absorb large quantities of water.[3]

As of August 2018[update], the internal classification of the family Cactaceae remained uncertain and subject to change. A classification incorporating many of the insights from the molecular studies was produced by Nyffeler and Eggli in 2010.[4] Various revisions have been published since, e.g. to the tribes Hylocereeae and Echinocereeae,[5] and the tribe Cereeae.[6] Classifications remained uncertain as of December 2024[update].

## Tribes and genera

[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Cactoideae" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

* Blossfeldieae
* Blossfeldia
* Fraileeae
* Frailea
* Cereeae[6]
* Aylosterinae
* Aylostera
* Cereinae
* Arrojadoa – Brasilicereus – Cereus – Cipocereus – Coleocephalocereus – Discocactus – Espostoopsis – Facheiroa – Leocereus – Melocactus – Micranthocereus – Pilosocereus – Praecereus – Serrulatocereus – Stetsonia – Xiquexique
* Gymnocalyciinae
* Gymnocalycium
* Rebutiinae
* Browningia – Rebutia – Weingartia
* Trichocereinae
* Acanthocalycium – Arthrocereus – Borzicactus – Chamaecereus – Cleistocactus – Denmoza – Echinopsis – Espostoa – Haageocereus – Harrisia – Lasiocereus – Leucostele – Lobivia – Loxanthocereus – Matucana – Mila – Oreocereus – Oroya – Rauhocereus – Reicheocactus – Samaipaticereus – Setiechinopsis – Soehrensia – Trichocereus – Vatricania – Weberbauerocereus
* Uebelmanniinae
* Uebelmannia

* Cacteae
* Acharagma – Ariocarpus – Astrophytum – Aztekium – Cochemiea – Coryphantha – Echinocactus – Epithelantha – Ferocactus – Geohintonia – Kadenicarpus – Kroenleinia – Leuchtenbergia – Lophophora – Mammillaria – Obregonia – Pediocactus – Pelecyphora – Rapicactus – Sclerocactus – Stenocactus – Strombocactus – Thelocactus – Turbinicarpus

* Echinocereeae
* Armatocereus – (Acanthocereus is placed in Hylocereeae)[5] –Austrocactus – Bergerocactus – Brachycereus – Carnegiea – Cephalocereus – Corryocactus – Echinocereus – Escontria – Isolatocereus – Jasminocereus – Leptocereus – Lophocereus – Marshallocereus – Mitrocereus – Myrtillocactus – Neoraimondia –Pachycereus – Peniocereus – Pfeiffera – Pilosocereus – Polaskia – Stenocereus – Strophocactus
* Hylocereeae[5]
* Acanthocereus – Deamia – Disocactus – Epiphyllum – Kimnachia – Pseudorhipsalis – Selenicereus (including Hylocereus) – Weberocereus
* Lymanbensonieae
* Calymmanthium – Lymanbensonia
* Notocacteae
* Copiapoa – Eriosyce – Neowerdermannia – Parodia – Yavia
* Rhipsalideae
* Hatiora – Lepismium – Rhipsalis – Rhipsalidopsis – Schlumbergera

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Goettsch, Bárbara; Hilton-Taylor, Craig; Cruz-Piñón, Gabriela; Duffy, James P.; Frances, Anne; Hernández, Héctor M.; Inger, Richard; Pollock, Caroline; Schipper, Jan; Superina, Mariella; Taylor, Nigel P.; Tognelli, Marcelo; Abba, Agustín M.; Arias, Salvador; Arreola-Nava, Hilda J. (2015-10-05). "High proportion of cactus species threatened with extinction". Nature Plants. 1 (10): 1–7\. doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.142. hdl:11336/11280. ISSN 2055-0278.1-7&rft.date=2015-10-05&rft_id=info:hdl/11336/11280&rft.issn=2055-0278&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nplants.2015.142&rft.aulast=Goettsch&rft.aufirst=Bárbara&rft.au=Hilton-Taylor,+Craig&rft.au=Cruz-Piñón,+Gabriela&rft.au=Duffy,+James+P.&rft.au=Frances,+Anne&rft.au=Hernández,+Héctor+M.&rft.au=Inger,+Richard&rft.au=Pollock,+Caroline&rft.au=Schipper,+Jan&rft.au=Superina,+Mariella&rft.au=Taylor,+Nigel+P.&rft.au=Tognelli,+Marcelo&rft.au=Abba,+Agustín+M.&rft.au=Arias,+Salvador&rft.au=Arreola-Nava,+Hilda+J.&rft_id=https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants2015142&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Cactoideae" class="Z3988">
2. ^ Arthur C. Gibson; Park S. Nobel (11 October 1990). The Cactus Primer. Harvard University Press. p. 23\. ISBN 9780674089914.
3. ^ Mauseth, J. D. (2006). Structure–function relationships in highly modified shoots of Cactaceae. Annals of Botany, 98(5), 901-926.
4. ^ Nyffeler, R. & Eggli, U. (2010). "A farewell to dated ideas and concepts: molecular phylogenetics and a revised suprageneric classification of the family Cactaceae". Schumannia. 6: 109–149\. doi:10.5167/uzh-43285. S2CID 89650660.109-149&rft.date=2010&rft_id=info:doi/10.5167/uzh-43285&rft_id=https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:89650660#id-name=S2CID&rft.aulast=Nyffeler&rft.aufirst=R.&rft.au=Eggli,+U.&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Cactoideae" class="Z3988">
5. ^ a b c Korotkova, Nadja; Borsch, Thomas & Arias, Salvador (2017). "A phylogenetic framework for the Hylocereeae (Cactaceae) and implications for the circumscription of the genera". Phytotaxa. 327 (1): 1–46\. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.327.1.1.1-46&rft.date=2017&rft_id=info:doi/10.11646/phytotaxa.327.1.1&rft.aulast=Korotkova&rft.aufirst=Nadja&rft.au=Borsch,+Thomas&rft.au=Arias,+Salvador&rft_id=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320829990&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Cactoideae" class="Z3988">
6. ^ a b Fantinati, Mariana R.; Soffiatti, Patricia & Calvente, Alice (2021). "A New Phylogenetic Hypothesis for Cereinae (Cactaceae) Points to a Monophyletic Subtribe" (PDF). Systematic Botany. 46 (3): 689–699\. doi:10.1600/036364421X16312068417020. Retrieved 2023-09-28.689-699&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/10.1600/036364421X16312068417020&rft.aulast=Fantinati&rft.aufirst=Mariana+R.&rft.au=Soffiatti,+Patricia&rft.au=Calvente,+Alice&rft_id=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alice-Calvente/publication/355551622_A_New_Phylogenetic_Hypothesis_for_Cereinae_Cactaceae_Points_to_a_Monophyletic_Subtribe/links/6411bc35315dfb4cce80c363/A-New-Phylogenetic-Hypothesis-for-Cereinae-Cactaceae-Points-to-a-Monophyletic-Subtribe.pdf&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Cactoideae" class="Z3988">

Taxon identifiers

Cactoideae|

* Wikidata: Q941876
* Wikispecies: Cactoideae
* BioLib: 400644
* CoL: 93LST
* GRIN: 1897
* iNaturalist: 335455
* NCBI: 186265
* Open Tree of Life: 227063
* Tropicos: 50187619
* VASCAN: 319

This Cactaceae article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

|

* v
* t
* e

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template