Google Books

Service from Google

"Google Print" redirects here. Not to be confused with Google Cloud Print.

This article is about Google's book search engine. For Google's e-book service, see Google Play Books. For the children's book, see The Google Book.

Google Books

Screenshot

Type of site

| Digital library
Owner| Google
URL| books.google.com
Launched| October 2004; 20 years ago (2004-10) (as Google Print)
Current status| Active

Google Books (previously known as Google Book Search, Google Print, and by its code-name Project Ocean)[1] is a service from Google that searches the full text of books and magazines that Google has scanned, converted to text using optical character recognition (OCR), and stored in its digital database.[2] Books are provided either by publishers and authors through the Google Books Partner Program, or by Google's library partners through the Library Project.[3] Additionally, Google has partnered with a number of magazine publishers to digitize their archives.[4][5]

The Publisher Program was first known as Google Print when it was introduced at the Frankfurt Book Fair in October 2004. The Google Books Library Project, which scans works in the collections of library partners and adds them to the digital inventory, was announced in December 2004.

The Google Books initiative has been hailed for its potential to offer unprecedented access to what may become the largest online body of human knowledge[6][7] and promoting the democratization of knowledge.[8] However, it has also been criticized for potential copyright violations,[8][9] and lack of editing to correct the many errors introduced into the scanned texts by the OCR process.

As of October 2019[update], Google celebrated 15 years of Google Books and provided the number of scanned books as more than 40 million titles.[10] Google estimated in 2010 that there were about 130 million distinct titles in the world,[11] and stated that it intended to scan all of them.[11] However, the scanning process in American academic libraries has slowed since the 2000s.[12][13] Google Book's scanning efforts have been subject to litigation, including Authors Guild v. Google, a class-action lawsuit in the United States, decided in Google's favor (see below). This was a major case that came close to changing copyright practices for orphan works in the United States.[14] A 2023 study by scholars from the University of California, Berkeley and Northeastern University's business schools found that Google Books's digitization of books has led to increased sales for the physical versions of the books.[15]

## Details

[edit]

Results from Google Books show up in both the universal Google Search and in the dedicated Google Books search website (books.google.com).

In response to search queries, Google Books allows users to view full pages from books in which the search terms appear if the book is out of copyright or if the copyright owner has given permission. If Google believes the book is still under copyright, a user sees "snippets" of text around the queried search terms. All instances of the search terms in the book text appear with a yellow highlight.

The four access levels used on Google Books are:[16]

* Full view: Books in the public domain are available for "full view" and can be downloaded for free. In-print books acquired through the Partner Program are also available for full view if the publisher has given permission, although this is rare.
* Preview: For in-print books where permission has been granted, the number of viewable pages is limited to a "preview" set by a variety of access restrictions and security measures, some based on user-tracking. Usually, the publisher can set the percentage of the book available for preview.[17] Users are restricted from copying, downloading or printing book previews. A watermark reading "Copyrighted material" appears at the bottom of pages. All books acquired through the Partner Program are available for preview.
* Snippet view: A "snippet view" – two to three lines of text surrounding the queried search term – is displayed in cases where Google does not have permission of the copyright owner to display a preview. This could be because Google cannot identify the owner or the owner declined permission. If a search term appears many times in a book, Google displays no more than three snippets, thus preventing the user from viewing too much of the book. Also, Google does not display any snippets for certain reference books, such as dictionaries, where the display of even snippets can harm the market for the work. Google maintains that no permission is required under copyright law to display the snippet view.[18]
* No preview: Google also displays search results for books that have not been digitized. As these books have not been scanned, their text is not searchable and only the metadata such as the title, author, publisher, number of pages, ISBN, subject and copyright information, and in some cases, a table of contents and book summary is available. In effect, this is similar to an online library card catalog.[3]

In response to criticism from groups such as the American Association of Publishers and the Authors Guild, Google announced an opt-out policy in August 2005, through which copyright owners could provide a list of titles that they do not want scanned, and the request would be respected. The company also stated that it would not scan any in-copyright books between August and 1 November 2005, to provide the owners with the opportunity to decide which books to exclude from the Project. Thus, copyright owners have three choices with respect to any work:[18]

1. It can participate in the Partner Program to make a book available for preview or full view, in which case it would share revenue derived from the display of pages from the work in response to user queries.
2. It can let Google scan the book under the Library Project and display snippets in response to user queries.
3. It can opt out of the Library Project, in which case Google will not scan the book. If the book has already been scanned, Google will reset its access level as 'No preview'.

Most scanned works are no longer in print or commercially available.[19]

In addition to procuring books from libraries, Google also obtains books from its publisher partners, through the "Partner Program" – designed to help publishers and authors promote their books. Publishers and authors submit either a digital copy of their book in EPUB or PDF format, or a print copy to Google, which is made available on Google Books for preview. The publisher can control the percentage of the book available for preview, with the minimum being 20%. They can also choose to make the book fully viewable, and even allow users to download a PDF copy. Books can also be made available for sale on Google Play.[3] Unlike the Library Project, this does not raise any copyright concerns as it is conducted pursuant to an agreement with the publisher. The publisher can choose to withdraw from the agreement at any time.[18]

For many books, Google Books displays the original page numbers. However, Tim Parks, writing in The New York Review of Books in 2014, noted that Google had stopped providing page numbers for many recent publications (likely the ones acquired through the Partner Program) "presumably in alliance with the publishers, in order to force those of us who need to prepare footnotes to buy paper editions."[20]

## Scanning of books

[edit]

The project began in 2002 under the codename Project Ocean. Google co-founder Larry Page had always had an interest in digitizing books. When he and Marissa Mayer began experimenting with book scanning in 2002, it took 40 minutes for them to digitize a 300-page book. But soon after the technology had been developed to the extent that scanning operators could scan up to 6000 pages an hour.[14]

Google established designated scanning centers to which books were transported by trucks. The stations could digitize at the rate of 1,000 pages per hour. The books were placed in a custom-built mechanical cradle that adjusted the book spine in place while an array of lights and optical instruments scanned the two open pages. Each page would have two cameras directed at it capturing the image, while a range finder LIDAR overlaid a three-dimensional laser grid on the book's surface to capture the curvature of the paper. A human operator would turn the pages by hand, using a foot pedal to take the photographs. With no need to flatten the pages or align them perfectly, Google's system not only reached a remarkable efficiency and speed but also helped protect the fragile collections from being over-handled. Afterwards, the crude images went through three levels of processing: first, de-warping algorithms used the LIDAR data fix the pages' curvature. Then, optical character recognition (OCR) software transformed the raw images into text, and, lastly, another round of algorithms extracted page numbers, footnotes, illustrations and diagrams.[14]

Many of the books are scanned using a customized Elphel 323 camera[21][22] at a rate of 1,000 pages per hour.[23] A patent awarded to Google in 2009 revealed that Google had come up with an innovative system for scanning books that uses two cameras and infrared light to automatically correct for the curvature of pages in a book. By constructing a 3D model of each page and then "de-warping" it, Google is able to present flat-looking pages without having to really make the pages flat, which requires the use of destructive methods such as unbinding or glass plates to individually flatten each page, which is inefficient for large scale scanning.[24][25]

Google decided to omit color information in favour of better spatial resolution, as most out-of-copyright books at the time did not contain colors. Each page image was passed through algorithms that distinguished the text and illustration regions. Text regions were then processed via OCR to enable full-text searching. Google expended considerable resources in coming up with optimal compression techniques, aiming for high image quality while keeping the file sizes minimal to enable access by internet users with low bandwidth.[26]

## Website functionality

[edit]

For each work, Google Books automatically generates an overview page. This page displays information extracted from the book—its publishing details, a high frequency word map, the table of contents—as well as secondary material, such as summaries, reader reviews (not readable in the mobile version of the website), and links to other relevant texts. A visitor to the page, for instance, might see a list of books that share a similar genre and theme, or they might see a list of current scholarship on the book. This content, moreover, offers interactive possibilities for users signed into their Google account. They can export the bibliographic data and citations in standard formats, write their own reviews, add it to their library to be tagged, organized, and shared with other people.[27][28] Thus, Google Books collects these more interpretive elements from a range of sources, including the users, third-party sites like Goodreads, and often the book's author and publisher.[29]

In fact, to encourage authors to upload their own books, Google has added several functionalities to the website. The authors can allow visitors to download their ebook for free, or they can set their own purchase price. They can change the price back and forth, offering discounts whenever it suits them. Also, if a book's author chooses to add an ISBN, LCCN or OCLC record number, the service will update the book's url to include it. Then, the author can set a specific page as the link's anchor. This option makes their book more easily discoverable.

## Ngram Viewer

[edit]

Main article: Google Ngram Viewer

The Ngram Viewer is a service connected to Google Books that graphs the frequency of word usage across their book collection. The service is important for historians and linguists as it can provide an inside look into human culture through word use throughout time periods.[30] This program has fallen under criticism because of errors in the metadata used in the program.[31]

## Content issues and criticism

[edit]

The project has received criticism that its stated aim of preserving orphaned and out-of-print works is at risk due to scanned data having errors and such problems not being solved.[32][33]

### Scanning errors

[edit]

A hand scanned in a Google book

The scanning process is subject to errors. For example, some pages may be unreadable, upside down, or in the wrong order. Scholars have even reported crumpled pages, obscuring thumbs and fingers, and smeared or blurry images.[34] On this issue, a declaration from Google at the end of scanned books says:

> The digitization at the most basic level is based on page images of the physical books. To make this book available as an ePub formatted file we have taken those page images and extracted the text using Optical Character Recognition (or OCR for short) technology. The extraction of text from page images is a difficult engineering task. Smudges on the physical books' pages, fancy fonts, old fonts, torn pages, etc. can all lead to errors in the extracted text. Imperfect OCR is only the first challenge in the ultimate goal of moving from collections of page images to extracted-text based books. Our computer algorithms also have to automatically determine the structure of the book (what are the headers and footers, where images are placed, whether text is verse or prose, and so forth). Getting this right allows us to render the book in a way that follows the format of the original book. Despite our best efforts you may see spelling mistakes, garbage characters, extraneous images, or missing pages in this book. Based on our estimates, these errors should not prevent you from enjoying the content of the book. The technical challenges of automatically constructing a perfect book are daunting, but we continue to make enhancements to our OCR and book structure extraction technologies.[35]

In 2009, Google stated that they would start using reCAPTCHA to help fix the errors found in Google Book scans. This method would only improve scanned words that are hard to recognize because of the scanning process and cannot solve errors such as turned pages or blocked words.[36]

Scanning errors have inspired works of art such as published collections of anomalous pages and a Tumblr blog.[37]

### Errors in metadata

[edit]

Scholars have frequently reported rampant errors in the metadata information on Google Books – including misattributed authors and erroneous dates of publication. Geoffrey Nunberg, a linguist researching on the changes in word usage over time noticed that a search for books published before 1950 and containing the word "internet" turned up an unlikely 527 results. Woody Allen is mentioned in 325 books ostensibly published before he was born. Google responded to Nunberg by blaming the bulk of errors on outside contractors.[31]

Other metadata errors reported include publication dates before the author's birth (e.g. 182 works by Charles Dickens prior to his birth in 1812); incorrect subject classifications (an edition of Moby Dick found under "computers", a biography of Mae West classified under "religion"), conflicting classifications (10 editions of Whitman's Leaves of Grass all classified as both "fiction" and "nonfiction"), incorrectly spelled titles, authors, and publishers (Moby Dick: or the White "Wall"), and metadata for one book incorrectly appended to a completely different book (the metadata for an 1818 mathematical work leads to a 1963 romance novel).[38][39]

> A review of the author, title, publisher, and publication year metadata elements for 400 randomly selected Google Books records was undertaken. The results show 36% of sampled books in the digitization project contained metadata errors. This error rate is higher than one would expect to find in a typical library online catalog.[40]

> The overall error rate of 36.75% found in this study suggests that Google Books' metadata has a high rate of error. While "major" and "minor" errors are a subjective distinction based on the somewhat indeterminate concept of "findability", the errors found in the four metadata elements examined in this study should all be considered major.[40]

Metadata errors based on incorrect scanned dates makes research using the Google Books Project database difficult. Google has shown only limited interest in cleaning up these errors.[41]

### Language issues

[edit]

Some European politicians and intellectuals have criticized Google's effort on linguistic imperialism grounds. They argue that because the vast majority of books proposed to be scanned are in English, it will result in disproportionate representation of natural languages in the digital world. German, Russian, French, and Spanish, for instance, are popular languages in scholarship. The disproportionate online emphasis on English, however, could shape access to historical scholarship, and, ultimately, the growth and direction of future scholarship. Among these critics is Jean-Noël Jeanneney, the former president of the Bibliothèque nationale de France.[42][43]

### Google Books versus Google Scholar

[edit]

While Google Books has digitized large numbers of journal back issues, its scans do not include the metadata required for identifying specific articles in specific issues. This has led the makers of Google Scholar to start their own program to digitize and host older journal articles (in agreement with their publishers).[44]

## Library partners

[edit]

The Google Books Library Project is aimed at scanning and making searchable the collections of several major research libraries.[45] Along with bibliographic information, snippets of text from a book are often viewable. If a book is out of copyright and in the public domain, the book is fully available to read or download.[16]

In-copyright books scanned through the Library Project are made available on Google Books for snippet view. Regarding the quality of scans, Google acknowledges that they are "not always of sufficiently high quality" to be offered for sale on Google Play. Also, because of supposed technical constraints, Google does not replace scans with higher quality versions that may be provided by the publishers.[46]

The project is the subject of the Authors Guild v. Google lawsuit, filed in 2005 and ruled in favor of Google in 2013, and again, on appeal, in 2015.

Copyright owners can claim the rights for a scanned book and make it available for preview or full view (by "transferring" it to their Partner Program account), or request Google to prevent the book text from being searched.[46]

The number of institutions participating in the Library Project has grown since its inception.[47]

### Initial partners

[edit]

Notice about the project at Michigan University Library

* Harvard University, Harvard University Library[48]

The Harvard University Library and Google conducted a pilot throughout 2005. The project continued, with the aim of increasing online access to the holdings of the Harvard University Library, which includes more than 15.8 million volumes. While physical access to Harvard's library materials is generally restricted to current Harvard students, faculty, and researchers, or to scholars who can come to Cambridge, the Harvard-Google Project has been designed to enable both members of the Harvard community and users everywhere to discover works in the Harvard collection.
* University of Michigan, University of Michigan Library[49]

As of March 2012, 5.5 million volumes were scanned.[50]
* New York Public Library[51]

In this pilot program, NYPL is working with Google to offer a collection of its public domain books, which will be scanned in their entirety and made available for free to the public online. Users will be able to search and browse the full text of these works. When the scanning process is complete, the books may be accessed from both The New York Public Library's website and from the Google search engine.[51]
* University of Oxford, Bodleian Library[52]
* Stanford University, Stanford University Libraries (SULAIR)[53]

### Additional partners

[edit]

Other institutional partners have joined the project since the partnership was first announced:[54]

* Austrian National Library[55]
* Bavarian State Library[56]
* Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon[57]
* Big Ten Academic Alliance[58]
* Columbia University, Columbia University Library System[59]
* Complutense University of Madrid[56][60]
* Cornell University, Cornell University Library[61]
* Ghent University, Ghent University Library/Boekentoren[56][62]
* Keio University, Keio Media Centers (Libraries)[63]
* National Library of Catalonia[64]
* Princeton University, Princeton University Library[65]
* University of California, California Digital Library[66]
* University of Lausanne, Cantonal and University Library of Lausanne[56][67]
* University of Mysore, Mysore University Library

The partnership was for digitizing 800,000 texts, including manuscripts written in palm leaves dating back to 8th century.[68][69]
* University of Texas at Austin, University of Texas Libraries[70]

The partnership was for digitizing the library's Latin American collection – about half a million volumes.[50]
* University of Virginia, University of Virginia Library[71]
* University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Wisconsin Libraries[72]

As of March 2012, about 600,000 volumes had been scanned.[50]

## History

[edit]

2002: A group of team members at Google officially launch the "secret 'books' project."[73] Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page came up with the idea that later became Google Books while still graduate students at Stanford in 1996. The history page on the Google Books website describes their initial vision for this project: "in a future world in which vast collections of books are digitized, people would use a 'web crawler' to index the books' content and analyze the connections between them, determining any given book's relevance and usefulness by tracking the number and quality of citations from other books."[73] This team visited the sites of some of the larger digitization efforts at that time including the Library of Congress's American Memory Project, Project Gutenberg, and the Universal Library to find out how they work, as well as the University of Michigan, Page's alma mater, and the base for such digitization projects as JSTOR and Making of America. In a conversation with the at that time University President Mary Sue Coleman, when Page found out that the university's current estimate for scanning all the library's volumes was 1,000 years, Page reportedly told Coleman that he "believes Google can help make it happen in six."[73]

2003: The team works to develop a high-speed scanning process as well as software for resolving issues in odd type sizes, unusual fonts, and "other unexpected peculiarities."[73]

December 2004: Google signaled an extension to its Google Print initiative known as the Google Print Library Project.[47] Google announced partnerships with several high-profile university and public libraries, including the University of Michigan, Harvard (Harvard University Library), Stanford (Green Library), Oxford (Bodleian Library), and the New York Public Library. According to press releases and university librarians, Google planned to digitize and make available through its Google Books service approximately 15 million volumes within a decade. The announcement soon triggered controversy, as publisher and author associations challenged Google's plans to digitize, not just books in the public domain, but also titles still under copyright.

September–October 2005: Two lawsuits against Google charge that the company has not respected copyrights and has failed to properly compensate authors and publishers. One is a class action suit on behalf of authors (Authors Guild v. Google, September 20, 2005) and the other is a civil lawsuit brought by five large publishers and the Association of American Publishers. (McGraw Hill v. Google, October 19, 2005)[9][74][75][76][77][78]

November 2005: Google changed the name of this service from Google Print to Google Book Search.[79] Its program enabling publishers and authors to include their books in the service was renamed Google Books Partner Program,[80] and the partnership with libraries became Google Books Library Project.

2006: Google added a "download a pdf" button to all its out-of-copyright, public domain books. It also added a new browsing interface along with new "About this Book" pages.[73]

August 2006: The University of California System announced that it would join the Books digitization project. This includes a portion of the 34 million volumes within the approximately 100 libraries managed by the System.[81]

September 2006: The Complutense University of Madrid became the first Spanish-language library to join the Google Books Library Project.[82]

October 2006: The University of Wisconsin–Madison announced that it would join the Book Search digitization project along with the Wisconsin Historical Society Library. Combined, the libraries have 7.2 million holdings.[83]

November 2006: The University of Virginia joined the project. Its libraries contain more than five million volumes and more than 17 million manuscripts, rare books and archives.[84]

January 2007: The University of Texas at Austin announced that it would join the Book Search digitization project. At least one million volumes would be digitized from the university's 13 library locations.

March 2007: The Bavarian State Library announced a partnership with Google to scan more than a million public domain and out-of-print works in German as well as English, French, Italian, Latin, and Spanish.[85]

May 2007: A book digitizing project partnership was announced jointly by Google and the Cantonal and University Library of Lausanne.[86]

May 2007: The Boekentoren Library of Ghent University announced that it would participate with Google in digitizing and making digitized versions of 19th century books in the French and Dutch languages available online.[87]

May 2007: Mysore University announces Google will digitize over 800,000 books and manuscripts–including around 100,000 manuscripts written in Sanskrit or Kannada on both paper and palm leaves.[68]

June 2007: The Committee on Institutional Cooperation (rebranded as the Big Ten Academic Alliance in 2016) announced that its twelve member libraries would participate in scanning 10 million books over the course of the next six years.[58]

July 2007: Keio University became Google's first library partner in Japan with the announcement that they would digitize at least 120,000 public domain books.[88]

August 2007: Google announced that it would digitize up to 500,000 both copyrighted and public domain items from Cornell University Library. Google would also provide a digital copy of all works scanned to be incorporated into the university's own library system.[89]

September 2007: Google added a feature that allows users to share snippets of books that are in the public domain. The snippets may appear exactly as they do in the scan of the book, or as plain text.[90]

September 2007: Google debuted a new feature called "My Library" which allows users to create personal customized libraries, selections of books that they can label, review, rate, or full-text search.[91]

December 2007: Columbia University was added as a partner in digitizing public domain works.[92]

May 2008: Microsoft tapered off and planned to end its scanning project, which had reached 750,000 books and 80 million journal articles.[93]

October 2008: A settlement was reached between the publishing industry and Google after two years of negotiation. Google agreed to compensate authors and publishers in exchange for the right to make millions of books available to the public.[9][94]

October 2008: The HathiTrust "Shared Digital Repository" (later known as the HathiTrust Digital Library) is launched jointly by the Committee on Institutional Cooperation and the 11 university libraries in the University of California system, all of which were Google partner libraries, in order to archive and provide academic access to books from their collections scanned by Google and others.[95]

November 2008: Google reached the 7 million book mark for items scanned by Google and by their publishing partners. 1 million were in full preview mode and 1 million were fully viewable and downloadable public domain works. About five million were out of print.[19][96][97]

December 2008: Google announced the inclusion of magazines in Google Books. Titles include New York Magazine, Ebony, and Popular Mechanics[98][99]

February 2009: Google launched a mobile version of Google Book Search, allowing iPhone and Android phone users to read over 1.5 million public domain works in the US (and over 500,000 outside the US) using a mobile browser. Instead of page images, the plain text of the book is displayed.[100]

May 2009: At the annual BookExpo convention in New York, Google signaled its intent to introduce a program that would enable publishers to sell digital versions of their newest books direct to consumers through Google.[101]

December 2009: A French court shut down the scanning of copyrighted books published in France, saying this violated copyright laws. It was the first major legal loss for the scanning project.[102]

April 2010: Visual artists were not included in the previous lawsuit and settlement, are the plaintiff groups in another lawsuit, and say they intend to bring more than just Google Books under scrutiny. "The new class action," read the statement, "goes beyond Google's Library Project, and includes Google's other systematic and pervasive infringements of the rights of photographers, illustrators and other visual artists."[103]

May 2010: It was reported that Google would launch a digital book store called Google Editions.[104] It would compete with Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Apple and other electronic book retailers with its own e-book store. Unlike others, Google Editions would be completely online and would not require a specific device (such as kindle, Nook, or iPad).

June 2010: Google passed 12 million books scanned.[11]

August 2010: It was announced that Google intends to scan all known existing 129,864,880 books within a decade, amounting to over 4 billion digital pages and 2 trillion words in total.[11]

December 2010: Google eBooks (Google Editions) was launched in the US.[105]

December 2010: Google launched the Ngram Viewer, which collects and graphs data on word usage across its book collection.[30]

March 2011: A federal judge rejected the settlement reached between the publishing industry and Google.[106]

March 2012: Google passed 20 million books scanned.[107][108]

March 2012: Google reached a settlement with publishers.[109]

January 2013: The documentary Google and the World Brain was shown at the Sundance Film Festival.[110]

November 2013: Ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, US District Judge Denny Chin sides with Google, citing fair use.[111] The authors said they would appeal.[112]

October 2015: The appeals court sided with Google, declaring that Google did not violate copyright law.[113] According to the New York Times, Google has scanned more than 25 million books.[12]

April 2016: The US Supreme Court declined to hear the Authors Guild's appeal, which means the lower court's decision stood, and Google would be allowed to scan library books and display snippets in search results without violating the law.[114]

### Status

[edit]

Google has been quite secretive regarding its plans on the future of the Google Books project. Scanning operations had been slowing down since at least 2012, as confirmed by the librarians at several of Google's partner institutions. At University of Wisconsin, the speed had reduced to less than half of what it was in 2006. However, the librarians have said that the dwindling pace could be a natural result of maturation of the project – initially stacks of books were entirely taken up for scanning whereas now only the titles that had not already been scanned needed to be considered.[50] The company's own Google Books timeline page did not mention anything after 2007 even in 2017, and the Google Books blog was merged into the Google Search blog in 2012.[115]

Despite winning the decade-long litigation in 2017, The Atlantic has said that Google has "all but shut down its scanning operation."[14] In April 2017, Wired reported that there were only a few Google employees working on the project, and new books were still being scanned, but at a significantly lower rate. It commented that the decade-long legal battle had caused Google to lose its ambition.[115]

## Legal issues

[edit]

Further information: Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Through the project, library books were being digitized somewhat indiscriminately regardless of copyright status, which led to a number of lawsuits against Google. By the end of 2008, Google had reportedly digitized over seven million books, of which only about one million were works in the public domain. Of the rest, one million were in copyright and in print, and five million were in copyright but out of print. In 2005, a group of authors and publishers brought a major class-action lawsuit against Google for infringement on the copyrighted works. Google argued that it was preserving "orphaned works" – books still under copyright, but whose copyright holders could not be located.[116]

The Authors Guild and Association of American Publishers separately sued Google in 2005 for its book project, citing "massive copyright infringement."[117] Google countered that its project represented a fair use and is the digital age equivalent of a card catalog with every word in the publication indexed.[9] The lawsuits were consolidated, and eventually a settlement was proposed. The settlement received significant criticism on a wide variety of grounds, including antitrust, privacy, and inadequacy of the proposed classes of authors and publishers. The settlement was eventually rejected,[118] and the publishers settled with Google soon after. The Authors Guild continued its case, and in 2011 their proposed class was certified. Google appealed that decision, with a number of amici asserting the inadequacy of the class, and the Second Circuit rejected the class certification in July 2013, remanding the case to the District Court for consideration of Google's fair use defense.[119]

In 2015 Authors Guild filed another appeal against Google to be considered by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. Google won the case unanimously based on the argument that they were not showing people the full texts but instead snippets, and they are not allowing people to illegally read the book.[120] In a report, courts stated that they did not infringe on copyright laws, as they were protected under the fair use clause.[121]

Authors Guild tried again in 2016 to appeal the decision and this time took their case to be considered by the Supreme Court. The case was rejected, leaving the Second Circuit's decision on the case intact, meaning that Google did not violate copyright laws.[122] This case also set a precedent for other similar cases in regards to fair use laws, as it further clarified the law and expanded it. Such clarification affects other scanning projects similar to Google.[120]

Other lawsuits followed the Authors Guild's lead. In 2006 a German lawsuit, previously filed, was withdrawn.[123] In June 2006, Hervé de la Martinière,[124] a French publisher known as La Martinière and Éditions du Seuil,[125] announced its intention to sue Google France.[126] In 2009, the Paris Civil Court awarded 300,000 EUR (approximately 430,000 USD) in damages and interest and ordered Google to pay 10,000 EUR a day until it removes the publisher's books from its database.[125][127] The court wrote, "Google violated author copyright laws by fully reproducing and making accessible" books that Seuil owns without its permission[125] and that Google "committed acts of breach of copyright, which are of harm to the publishers".[124] Google said it will appeal.[125] Syndicat National de l'Edition, which joined the lawsuit, said Google has scanned about 100,000 French works under copyright.[125]

In December 2009, Chinese author Mian Mian filed a civil lawsuit for $8,900 against Google for scanning her novel, Acid Lovers. This is the first such lawsuit to be filed against Google in China.[128] Also, in November that year, the China Written Works Copyright Society (CWWCS) accused Google of scanning 18,000 books by 570 Chinese writers without authorization. Google agreed on Nov 20 to provide a list of Chinese books it had scanned, but the company refused to admit having "infringed" copyright laws.[129][unreliable source?]

In March 2007, Thomas Rubin, associate general counsel for copyright, trademark, and trade secrets at Microsoft, accused Google of violating copyright law with their book search service. Rubin specifically criticized Google's policy of freely copying any work until notified by the copyright holder to stop.[130]

Google licensing of public domain works is also an area of concern due to using of digital watermarking techniques with the books. Some published works that are in the public domain, such as all works created by the U.S. Federal government, are still treated like other works under copyright, and therefore locked after 1922.[131]

## Similar projects

[edit]

* Project Gutenberg is a volunteer effort to digitize and archive cultural works, to "encourage the creation and distribution of eBooks". It was founded in 1971 by Michael S. Hart and is the oldest digital library. As of October 3, 2015[update], Project Gutenberg reached 50,000 items in its collection.
* Internet Archive is a non-profit which digitizes over 1000 books a day, as well as mirrors books from Google Books and other sources. As of May 2011[update], it hosted over 2.8 million public domain books, greater than the approximate 1 million public domain books at Google Books.[132] Open Library, a sister project of Internet Archive, lends 80,000 scanned and purchased commercial ebooks to the visitors of 150 libraries.[133]
* HathiTrust maintains HathiTrust Digital Library since October 13, 2008,[134] which preserves and provides access to material scanned by Google, some of the Internet Archive books, and some scanned locally by partner institutions. As of May 2010[update], it includes about 6 million volumes, over 1 million of which are public domain (at least in the US).
* ACLS Humanities E-Book, an online collection of over 5,400 books of high quality in the humanities and related social sciences, accessible through institutional subscription.
* Microsoft funded the scanning of 300,000 books to create Live Search Books in late 2006. It ran until May 2008, when the project was abandoned[135] and the books were made freely available on the Internet Archive.[136]
* The National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a project under Ministry of Human Resource Development, India. The objective is to integrate several national and international digital libraries in one single web-portal. The NDLI provides free of cost access to many books in English and the Indian languages.
* Europeana links to roughly 10 million digital objects as of 2010[update], including video, photos, paintings, audio, maps, manuscripts, printed books, and newspapers from the past 2,000 years of European history from over 1,000 archives in the European Union.[137][138]
* Gallica from the French National Library links to about 4,000,000 digitized books, newspapers, manuscripts, maps and drawings, etc. Created in 1997, the digital library continues to expand at a rate of about 5000 new documents per month. Since the end of 2008, most of the new scanned documents are available in image and text formats. Most of these documents are written in French.
* Wikisource
* Runivers

## See also

[edit]

* Internet portal
* Literature portal

* A9.com, Amazon.com's book search
* Book Rights Registry
* Digital library
* List of digital library projects
* Universal library
* National Electronic Library

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Love, Dylan. "An Inside Look At One Of Google's Most Controversial Projects". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 21 October 2017. Retrieved 21 October 2017.
2. ^ The basic Google book link is found at: https://books.google.com/ Archived 2014-06-26 at the Wayback Machine. The "advanced" interface allowing more specific searches is found at: https://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
3. ^ a b c "Where do these books come from?". Google Books Help. Archived from the original on 24 December 2014. Retrieved 10 November 2014.
4. ^ Mark O'Neill (28 January 2009). "Read Complete Magazines Online in Google Books". Make Use Of. Archived from the original on 2 April 2016. Retrieved 15 April 2016.
5. ^ "About Magazines search". Google Books Help. Archived from the original on 14 May 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
6. ^ Bergquist, Kevin (2006-02-13). "Google project promotes public good". The University Record. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
7. ^ Pace, Andrew K. (January 2006). "Is This the Renaissance or the Dark Ages?". American Libraries. American Library Association. Archived from the original on 2007-04-03. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
8. ^ a b Malte Herwig, "Google's Total Library" Archived 2012-01-28 at the Wayback Machine, Spiegel Online International, March 28, 2007.
9. ^ a b c d Copyright infringement suits against Google and their settlement: "Copyright Accord Would Make Millions More Books Available Online". Google Press Center. Archived from the original on November 1, 2008. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
10. ^ "15 years of Google Books". 17 October 2019. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
11. ^ a b c d Google: 129 Million Different Books Have Been Published Archived 2015-06-14 at the Wayback Machine PC World
12. ^ a b Heyman, Stephen (28 October 2015). "Google Books: A Complex and Controversial Experiment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
13. ^ "What Ever Happened to Google Books?". The New Yorker. 11 September 2015. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
14. ^ a b c d James Somers (20 April 2017). "Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 23 December 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
15. ^ Nagaraj, Abhishek; Reimers, Imke (2023). "Digitization and the Market for Physical Works: Evidence from the Google Books Project". American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 15 (4): 428–458. doi:10.1257/pol.20210702. ISSN 1945-7731. S2CID 262153738.
16. ^ a b Google Books Library Project – An enhanced card catalog of the world's books. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
17. ^ Duffy, Greg (March 2005). "Google's Cookie and Hacking Google Print". Kuro5hin. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2006-11-28.
18. ^ a b c Band, Jonathan (2006). "The Google Library Project: Both Sides of the Story". Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2015-01-26.
19. ^ a b Perez, Juan Carlos (October 28, 2008). "In Google Book Settlement, Business Trumps Ideals". PC World. Archived from the original on 2013-11-04. Retrieved 2013-08-27.
20. ^ Parks, Tim (13 September 2014). "References, Please". The New York Review of Books. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
21. ^ Almaer, Dion (11 August 2007). "Weekly Google Code Roundup for August 10th". Google Code. Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
22. ^ "Resume of Ted Merrill, Software Engineer". Archived from the original on 3 January 2006. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
23. ^ Kelly, Kevin (May 14, 2006). "Scan This Book!". New York Times Magazine. Archived from the original on 2020-12-10. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
24. ^ Shankland, Stephen (4 May 2009). "Patent reveals Google's book-scanning advantage". CNET. Archived from the original on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
25. ^ Clements, Maureen (30 April 2009). "The Secret Of Google's Book Scanning Machine Revealed". NPR. Archived from the original on 28 April 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
26. ^ Leetaru, Kalev (2008-10-11). "Mass book digitization: The deeper story of Google Books and the Open Content Alliance". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v13i10.2101. ISSN 1396-0466. Archived from the original on 2022-07-25. Retrieved 2022-06-07.
27. ^ Miller, Laura (8 December 2010). "Is Google leading an e-book revolution?". Salon. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 11 January 2015.
28. ^ "My Library FAQ". Google Books Help. Archived from the original on 26 October 2014. Retrieved 6 November 2014.
29. ^ "Where do you get the information for the 'About this book' page?". Google Books Help. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
30. ^ a b Zimmer, Ben (18 October 2012). "Bigger, Better Google Ngrams: Brace Yourself for the Power of Grammar". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 2016-10-03. Retrieved 2016-09-20.
31. ^ a b Miller, Laura (9 September 2010). "The trouble with Google Books". Salon. Archived from the original on 11 January 2015. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
32. ^ Morrison, Dianne See (6 February 2009). "paidContent.org - The Plot Thickens For E-Books: Google And Amazon Putting More Titles On Mobile Phones". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2017.
33. ^ "Google Books: How bad is the metadata? Let me count the ways…". Music - Technology - Policy. WordPress. 29 September 2009. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
34. ^ Miller, Laura (8 December 2010). "Is Google leading an e-book revolution?". Salon. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 11 January 2015.
35. ^ Dickens, Charles (1881). Great Expections by Charles Dickens on Google Books reader. Archived from the original on 2021-03-22. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
36. ^ "Google Acquisition Will Help Correct Errors in Scanned Works". CBS News. 17 September 2009. Archived from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved 2016-09-20.
37. ^ Goldsmith, Kenneth (4 December 2013). "The Artful Accidents of Google Books". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 12 August 2022. Retrieved 12 August 2022.
38. ^ "Major errors prompt questions over Google Book Search's scholarly value". 10 September 2009. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
39. ^ "Google Books: The Metadata Mess" Archived 2016-06-04 at the Wayback Machine, Geoffrey Nunberg
40. ^ a b James, Ryan; Weiss, Andrew (2012). "An Assessment of Google Books' Metadata". Journal of Library Metadata. 12: 15–22. doi:10.1080/19386389.2012.652566. hdl:10125/22228. S2CID 55947527.
41. ^ Nunberg, Geoffrey (August 31, 2009). "Google's Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 25 December 2019.
42. ^ Jean-Noël Jeanneney (2006-10-23). Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe (book abstract; Foreword by Ian Wilson). University of Chicago Press. pp. vii–xiii. ISBN 978-0-226-39577-7. Archived from the original on 2023-02-15. Retrieved 2015-08-13.
43. ^ Riding, Alan (2005-04-11). "France Detects a Cultural Threat in Google". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2022-06-07. Retrieved 2022-06-07.
44. ^ Barbara Quint, "Changes at Google Scholar: A Conversation With Anurag Acharya" Archived 2011-03-26 at the Wayback Machine, Information Today, August 27, 2007.
45. ^ Stein, Linda L.; Lehu, Peter, J (2009). Literary Research and the American Realism and Naturalism Period: Strategies and Sources. Scarecrow Press. p. 261\. ISBN 9780810861411. Archived from the original on 2023-02-15. Retrieved 2016-04-18.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
46. ^ a b "Books Help". Archived from the original on 10 January 2015. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
47. ^ a b O'Sullivan, Joseph and Adam Smith. "All booked up," Archived 2020-12-21 at the Wayback Machine Googleblog. December 14, 2004.
48. ^ "Harvard-Google Project". Harvard University Library. Archived from the original on 29 December 2018. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
49. ^ "Michigan Digitization Project". University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
50. ^ a b c d Jennifer Howard (9 March 2012). "Google Begins to Scale Back Its Scanning of Books From University Libraries". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
51. ^ a b "Press Releases". Archived from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2007-05-18.
52. ^ "Oxford Google Books Project". Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 29 November 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
53. ^ "Stanford's Role in Google Books". Stanford University Libraries. Archived from the original on 2013-06-06. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
54. ^ "Library Partners – Google Books". Google News. Archived from the original on 2023-02-15. Retrieved 2019-07-09.
55. ^ "Austrian Books Online". Austrian National Library. Archived from the original on 2015-03-03. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
56. ^ a b c d Albanese, Andrew (2007-06-15). "Google Book Search Grows". Library Journal. Archived from the original on 2014-11-18. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
57. ^ "Google partenaire numérique officiel de la bibliothèque de Lyon". Archived from the original on 2010-01-13. Retrieved 2008-12-06.
58. ^ a b "Google Book Search Project - Menu". Big Ten Academic Alliance. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 30 June 2016.
59. ^ "Columbia University Libraries Becomes Newest Partner in Google Book Search Library Project". Columbia University Libraries. 2007-12-13. Archived from the original on 2013-08-24. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
60. ^ "Complutense Universidad + Google" (PDF) (in Spanish). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-02-28.
61. ^ "Cornell University Library becomes newest partner in Google Book Search Library Project". Cornell University Library. Archived from the original on 11 September 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
62. ^ "Ghent University Library Search Results". Archived from the original on 2009-04-26. Retrieved 2009-04-23.
63. ^ "Keio University to partner with Google, Inc. for digitalization and release of its library collection to the world For "Formation of Knowledge of the digital era"" (PDF). Keio University. 2007-07-06. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-08-29. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
64. ^ "Google digitaliza 35 mil libros de la Biblioteca de Catalunya libres de derechos de autor". LA VANGUARDIA. Archived from the original on 2015-05-13. Retrieved 2012-12-04.
65. ^ Cliatt, Cass (2007-02-05). "Library joins Google project to make books available online". Princeton University. Archived from the original on 2017-01-09. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
66. ^ "UC libraries partner with Google to digitize books". University of California. 2006-08-09. Archived from the original on 2006-08-15. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
67. ^ Cantonal and University Library of Lausanne/Bibliothèque Cantonale et Universitaire (BCU) + Google (in French) Archived 2007-12-14 at the Wayback Machine
68. ^ a b "Google to digitise books at Mysore varsity". Hindustan Times. 20 May 2007. Archived from the original on 2015-01-25. Retrieved 2015-01-22.
69. ^ Anderson, Nate (2007-05-22). "Google to scan 800,000 manuscripts, books from Indian university". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 2017-07-06. Retrieved 2017-06-14.
70. ^ "The University of Texas Libraries Partner with Google to Digitize Books". The University of Texas Libraries. 2007-01-19. Archived from the original on 2013-09-13. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
71. ^ Wood, Carol, S. (2006-11-14). "U.Va. Library Joins the Google Books Library Project". University of Virginia. Archived from the original on 2014-02-01. Retrieved 30 August 2013.`{{cite web}}`: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
72. ^ "University of Wisconsin-Madison Google Digitization Initiative". University of Wisconsin-Madison. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
73. ^ a b c d e Google Books History – Google Books. Archived from the original on 2016-02-06. Retrieved 2016-02-22.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
74. ^ "Authors Guild v. Google Settlement Resources Page". Authors Guild. Archived from the original on November 13, 2008. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
75. ^ "A new chapter". The Economist. October 30, 2008. Archived from the original on May 7, 2009. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
76. ^ Aiken, Paul (2005-09-20). "Authors Guild Sues Google, Citing "Massive Copyright Infringement"". Authors Guild. Archived from the original on 2007-02-09. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
77. ^ Gilbert, Alorie (2005-10-19). "Publishers sue Google over book search project". CNET News. Archived from the original on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
78. ^ "The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.; Pearson Education, Inc.; Penguin Group (USA) Inc.; Simon and Schuster, Inc.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Plaintiffs, v. Google Inc., Defendant" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-07-13. Retrieved 2007-10-05. PDF file of the complaint. SD. N.Y. Case No. 05-CV-8881-JES.
79. ^ Jen Grant (November 17, 2005). "Judging Book Search by its cover" (blog). Googleblog. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2006.
80. ^ "Library partners". Google books. Retrieved 2013-02-27.
81. ^ Colvin, Jennifer. "UC libraries partner with Google to digitize books". University of California. Archived from the original on 15 August 2006. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
82. ^ "University Complutense of Madrid and Google to Make Hundreds of Thousands of Books Available Online". Google. Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
83. ^ "New release: UW-Madison Joins Google's Worldwide Book Digitization Project". University of Wisconsin-Madison. Archived from the original on 9 September 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
84. ^ "The University of Virginia Library Joins the Google Books Library Project". Google. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
85. ^ Mills, Elinor. "Bavarian library joins Google book search project". Cnet. Archived from the original on 2 March 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
86. ^ Reed, Brock. "La Bibliothèque, C'est Google" (Wired Campus Newsletter) Archived 2008-12-07 at the Wayback Machine, Chronicle of Higher Education. May 17, 2007.
87. ^ "Google Books @ UGent". Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent. Archived from the original on 2019-07-09. Retrieved 2019-07-09.
88. ^ DeBonis, Laura. "Keio University Joins Google's Library Project". Google Books Search. Archived from the original on 9 March 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
89. ^ "Cornell University Library becomes newest partner in Google Book Search Library Project". Cornell University Library. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
90. ^ Tungare, Manas. "Share and enjoy". Google Books Search. Archived from the original on 15 August 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
91. ^ "Google Books".
92. ^ Stricker, Gabriel. "Columbia University joins the Google Book Search Library Project". Google Books Search. Archived from the original on 9 March 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
93. ^ Helft, Miguel (May 24, 2008). "Microsoft Will Shut Down Book Search Program". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2020-12-12. Retrieved 2008-05-24.
94. ^ Cohen, Noam (February 1, 2009). "Some Fear Google's Power in Digital Books". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2020-12-12. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
95. ^ "Launch of HathiTrust - October 13, 2008 | www.hathitrust.org | HathiTrust Digital Library". www.hathitrust.org. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-07.
96. ^ "Massive EU online library looks to compete with Google". Agence France-Presse. November 2008. Archived from the original on 2009-02-13. Retrieved 2008-11-24. "Google, one of the pioneers in this domain on the other hand, claims to have seven million books available for its "Google Book Search" project, which saw the light of day at the end of 2004."
97. ^ Rich, Motoko (January 4, 2009). "Google Hopes to Open a Trove of Little-Seen Books". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2009-04-10. Retrieved 2009-01-05.
98. ^ "Google updates search index with old magazines". NBC News. Associated Press. December 10, 2008. Archived from the original on March 2, 2014. Retrieved June 29, 2009.
99. ^ "Official Google Blog: Search and find magazines on Google Book Search". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on 2009-08-02. Retrieved 2009-06-29.
100. ^ "1.5 million books in your pocket". Inside Google Books. 5 February 2009. Archived from the original on 27 July 2013. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
101. ^ Rich, Motoko (2009-06-01). "Preparing to Sell E-Books, Google Takes on Amazon". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2009-06-08. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
102. ^ Faure, Gaelle (December 19, 2009). "French court shuts down Google Books project". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2009-12-22. Retrieved 2009-12-19.
103. ^ O'Dell, Jolie (8 April 2010). "Google Gets Sued by Photographers Over Google Books". Mashable. Archived from the original on 21 August 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
104. ^ Vascellaro, Jessica E. (4 May 2010). "Google Readies Its E-Book Plan, Bringing in a New Sales Approach". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 12 March 2015. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
105. ^ "Google launches eBookstore with more than 3 million titles". MacWorld. Archived from the original on 2010-12-10. Retrieved 2011-01-02.
106. ^ "Judge rejects Google settlement with authors". Market Watch. Archived from the original on 2023-02-15. Retrieved 2012-02-21.
107. ^ "Google book scan project slows down". Law Librarian Blog. Archived from the original on 2012-03-15.
108. ^ Howard, Jennifer Google Begins to Scale Back Its Scanning of Books From University Libraries Archived 2013-10-29 at the Wayback Machine, March 9, 2012
109. ^ "The Association of American Publishers". Archived from the original on 2013-11-03. Retrieved 2013-11-17.
110. ^ "Google and the world brain - Polar Star Films". Archived from the original on 2013-09-02. Retrieved 2013-09-02.
111. ^ "Google Books ruled legal in massive win for fair use". Archived from the original on 2017-04-30. Retrieved 2017-06-14.
112. ^ "Siding With Google, Judge Says Book Search Does Not Infringe Copyright" Archived 2017-01-20 at the Wayback Machine, Claire Cain Miller and Julie Bosman, New York Times, November 14, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
113. ^ "Google book-scanning project legal, says U.S. appeals court". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2015-10-22. Retrieved 2021-07-10.
114. ^ US Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Google Book-Scanning Project Archived 2016-04-18 at the Wayback Machine April 18, 2016
115. ^ a b Scott Rosenberg (11 April 2017). "How Google Book Search Got Lost". Wired. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
116. ^ Robert Darnton (February 12, 2009). "Google and the Future of Books". The New York Review of Books. Archived from the original on October 29, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
117. ^ "Authors sue Google over book plan". BBC News. 21 September 2005. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 23 April 2018.
118. ^ 770 F.Supp.2d 666 (SDNY March 22, 2011).
119. ^ Authors Guild v. Google, 2d Cir. July 1, 2013.
120. ^ a b Peet, Lisa (2015-10-19). "U.S. Appeals Court Rules Google Book Scanning Is Fair Use". Library Journal. Archived from the original on 2018-01-25. Retrieved 2016-09-20.`{{cite web}}`: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
121. ^ "Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., No. 13-4829 (2d Cir. 2015)". Archived from the original on 2016-09-13. Retrieved 2016-09-21.
122. ^ "Google Books just won a decade-long copyright fight". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2016-08-28. Retrieved 2016-09-20.
123. ^ Sullivan, Danny (2006-06-28). "Google Book Search Wins Victory In German Challenge". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original (blog) on 2006-10-17. Retrieved 2006-11-11.
124. ^ a b Sage, Adam (December 19, 2009). "French publishers toast triumph over Google". The Times of London. Archived from the original on 2011-06-12. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
125. ^ a b c d e Smith, Heather (December 18, 2009). "Google's French Book Scanning Project Halted by Court". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2023-02-15. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
126. ^ Oates, John (June 7, 2006). "French publisher sues Google". The Register. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
127. ^ "Fine for Google over French books". BBC News. December 18, 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-12-19. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
128. ^ "Google Faces Chinese Lawsuit Over Digital Book Project". 28 December 2009. Archived from the original on 1 January 2010. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
129. ^ "Writer sues Google for copyright infringement". China Daily. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved March 20, 2012.
130. ^ Thomas Claburn (March 6, 2007). "Microsoft Attorney Accuses Google Of Copyright Violations". InformationWeek. Archived from the original on October 12, 2007. Retrieved March 6, 2007.
131. ^ Robert B. Townsend, Google Books: Is It Good for History? Archived 2013-05-25 at the Wayback Machine, Perspectives (September 2007).
132. ^ The number of Public Domain books at Google Books can be calculated by looking at the number of Public Domain books at HathiTrust, which is the academic mirror of Google Books. As of May 2010 HathiTrust had over 1 million Public Domain books.
133. ^ "Internet Archive and Library Partners Develop Joint Collection of 80,000+ eBooks To Extend Traditional In-Library Lending Model". San Francisco. February 22, 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-26.
134. ^ "languagehat.com : TRUST HATHI, NOT GOOGLE". Archived from the original on 2009-06-03. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
135. ^ "Microsoft starts online library in challenge to Google Books". AFP. Melbourne. 2006-12-08. Archived from the original on 2018-06-18. Retrieved 2008-11-24.
136. ^ Xio, Christina. "Google Books-An Other Popular Service By Google". Archived from the original on 4 April 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2012.
137. ^ http://version1.europeana.eu/[permanent dead link]
138. ^ Snyder, Chris (November 20, 2008). "Europe's Answer to Google Book Search Crashes on Day 1". Wired. Archived from the original on 2009-04-16. Retrieved 2008-11-24.

## Further reading

[edit]

* Hoffmann, Anna Lauren (2016). "Google Books, Libraries, and Self-Respect: Information Justice beyond Distributions". Library Quarterly. 86: 76–92. doi:10.1086/684141. S2CID 146482065.
* Jeanneney, Jean-Noël (2008). Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

## External links

[edit]

Wikidata has the property:

* Google Books ID (P675) (see uses)

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Google Books.

* Official website
* About Google Books
* Jones, Elisabeth (May 14, 2013). "New Google Books Library Project Timeline: Now With (more) Citations!".
* Darnton, Robert (February 12, 2009). "Google & the Future of Books". New York Review of Books. Vol. 56, no. 2\. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009.
* "Public Domain Archive and Reprints Service". Public Domain Reprints.
* Somers, James (Apr 20, 2017). "Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria". The Atlantic.
* Toobin, Jeffrey (February 5, 2007). "Google's Moon Shot". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on February 2, 2007.

* v
* t
* e

Google

* Alphabet Inc.
* History
* List of Android apps
* List of Easter eggs
* April Fools' Day
* List of mergers and acquisitions

Company

| Divisions|

* Ads
* AI
* Brain
* DeepMind
* Android
* booting process
* recovery mode
* software development
* version history
* China
* Goojje
* Chrome
* Cloud
* Glass
* Google.org
* Crisis Response
* Public Alerts
* RechargeIT
* Health
* Maps
* Pixel
* Search
* Timeline
* Sidewalk Labs
* Sustainability
* YouTube
* History
* "Me at the zoo"
* Social impact
* YouTuber

|

People|

| Current|

* Krishna Bharat
* Vint Cerf
* Jeff Dean
* John Doerr
* Sanjay Ghemawat
* Al Gore
* John L. Hennessy
* Urs Hölzle
* Salar Kamangar
* Ray Kurzweil
* Ann Mather
* Alan Mulally
* Rick Osterloh
* Sundar Pichai (CEO)
* Ruth Porat (CFO)
* Rajen Sheth
* Hal Varian
* Neal Mohan

|

Former|

* Andy Bechtolsheim
* Sergey Brin (Founder)
* David Cheriton
* Matt Cutts
* David Drummond
* Alan Eustace
* Timnit Gebru
* Omid Kordestani
* Paul Otellini
* Larry Page (Founder)
* Patrick Pichette
* Eric Schmidt
* Ram Shriram
* Amit Singhal
* Shirley M. Tilghman
* Rachel Whetstone
* Susan Wojcicki

Real estate|

* 111 Eighth Avenue
* Androidland
* Barges
* Binoculars Building
* Central Saint Giles
* Chelsea Market
* Chrome Zone
* Data centers
* Googleplex
* Mayfield Mall
* Pier 57
* Sidewalk Toronto
* St. John's Terminal
* YouTube Space
* YouTube Theater

Design|

* Fonts
* Croscore
* Noto
* Product Sans
* Roboto
* Logo
* Doodle
* Doodle Champion Island Games
* Magic Cat Academy
* Material Design

Events|

* Android
* Developer Challenge
* Developer Day
* Developer Lab
* Code-in
* Code Jam
* Developer Day
* Developers Live
* Doodle4Google
* G-Day
* I/O
* Jigsaw
* Living Stories
* Lunar XPRIZE
* Mapathon
* Science Fair
* Summer of Code
* Talks at Google

YouTube|

* Awards
* CNN/YouTube presidential debates
* Comedy Week
* Live
* Music Awards
* Space Lab
* Symphony Orchestra

Projects and
initiatives|

* 20% project
* Area 120
* Reply
* Tables
* ATAP
* Business Groups
* Computing University Initiative
* Data Liberation Front
* Data Transfer Project
* Developer Expert
* Digital Garage
* Digital News Initiative
* Digital Unlocked
* Dragonfly
* Founders' Award
* Free Zone
* Get Your Business Online
* Google for Education
* Google for Startups
* Labs
* Liquid Galaxy
* Made with Code
* Māori
* News Lab
* Nightingale
* Objectives and key results
* PowerMeter
* Privacy Sandbox
* Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab
* RechargeIT
* Shield
* Silicon Initiative
* Solve for X
* Starline
* Student Ambassador Program
* Submarine communications cables
* Dunant
* Grace Hopper
* Sunroof
* YouTube
* Creator Awards
* Next Lab and Audience Development Group
* Original Channel Initiative
* Zero

Criticism|

* 2018 data breach
* 2018 walkouts
* Alphabet Workers Union
* Censorship
* DeGoogle
* Dragonfly
* FairSearch
* "Ideological Echo Chamber" memo
* Litigation
* Privacy concerns
* Street View
* San Francisco tech bus protests
* Services outages
* Smartphone patent wars
* Worker organization

YouTube|

* Back advertisement controversy
* Censorship
* Copyright issues
* Copyright strike
* Elsagate
* Fantastic Adventures scandal
* Headquarters shooting
* Kohistan video case
* Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
* Slovenian government incident

Development

| Operating systems|

* Android
* Automotive
* Glass OS
* Go
* gLinux
* Goobuntu
* Things
* TV
* Wear OS
* ChromeOS
* ChromiumOS
* Neverware
* Fuchsia
* TV

|

Libraries/
frameworks|

* ALTS
* AMP
* Angular
* JS
* ARCore
* APIs
* Blockly
* Chart API
* Charts
* Dialogflow
* Exposure Notification
* Fast Pair
* Federated Learning of Cohorts
* File System
* FlatBuffers
* Flutter
* Gears
* gRPC
* Gson
* Guava
* Guice
* Guetzli
* JAX
* gVisor
* MapReduce
* Matter
* Mobile Services
* Neural Machine Translation
* OpenSocial
* Pack
* Polymer
* Protocol Buffers
* Reqwireless
* Shell
* Skia Graphics Engine
* Tango
* TensorFlow
* Test
* WaveNet
* Weave
* Web Accelerator
* WebRTC

Platforms|

* App Engine
* AppJet
* Apps Script
* Cloud Platform
* Anvato
* Firebase
* Cloud Messaging
* Crashlytics
* Global IP Solutions
* Internet Low Bitrate Codec
* Internet Speech Audio Codec
* Gridcentric, Inc.
* ITA Software
* Kubernetes
* LevelDB
* Neatx
* Project IDX
* SageTV

Apigee|

* Bigtable
* Bitium
* Chronicle
* VirusTotal
* Compute Engine
* Connect
* Dataflow
* Datastore
* Kaggle
* Looker
* Mandiant
* Messaging
* Orbitera
* Shell
* Stackdriver
* Storage

Tools|

* American Fuzzy Lop
* Android Cloud to Device Messaging
* Android Debug Bridge
* Android Studio
* App Maker
* App Runtime for Chrome
* AppSheet
* Bazel
* Chrome Frame
* Closure Tools
* Cpplint
* Data Protocol
* Gadgets
* Gerrit
* GYP
* Kythe
* Lighthouse
* MIT App Inventor
* Mashup Editor
* Native Client
* Optimize
* OpenRefine
* OR-Tools
* PageSpeed
* Plugin for Eclipse
* Programmable Search Engine
* Public DNS
* reCAPTCHA
* Schema.org
* Search Console
* Sitemaps
* Swiffy
* Tesseract (software)
* Trendalyzer
* VisBug
* Wave Federation Protocol
* Web Toolkit

Search algorithms|

* Hummingbird
* PageRank
* applications in biochemistry
* Matrix
* Panda
* Penguin
* Pigeon
* RankBrain

Others|

* BERT
* BigQuery
* Chrome Experiments
* Flutter
* Gemini
* Googlebot
* Keyhole Markup Language
* LaMDA
* Open Location Code
* PaLM
* Programming languages
* Caja
* Carbon
* Dart
* Go
* Sawzall
* Transformer
* Viewdle
* Webdriver Torso
* Web Server

File formats|

* AAB
* APK
* AV1
* On2 Technologies
* VP3
* VP6
* VP8
* libvpx
* VP9
* WebM
* WebP
* WOFF2

Products

| Entertainment|

* Currents (news app)
* Green Throttle Games
* Owlchemy Labs
* Oyster
* PaperofRecord.com
* Podcasts
* Quick, Draw!
* Santa Tracker
* Songza
* Stadia
* games
* Typhoon Studios
* TV
* Vevo
* Video

Play|

* Books
* Games
* most downloaded apps
* Music
* Newsstand
* Pass
* Services

YouTube|

* BandPage
* BrandConnect
* Content ID
* Instant
* Kids
* Music
* Official channel
* Premium
* original programming
* YouTube Rewind
* RightsFlow
* Select
* Shorts
* Studio
* TV

Communication|

* Allo
* Bump
* Buzz
* Chat
* Contacts
* Currents (social app)
* Dodgeball
* Duo
* Fi Wireless
* Friend Connect
* Gizmo5
* Google+
* Gmail
* History
* Inbox
* Interface
* Groups
* Hangouts
* Helpouts
* IME
* Japanese
* Pinyin
* Jaiku
* Marratech
* Meebo
* Meet
* Messages
* Moderator
* Neotonic Software
* Orkut
* Postini
* Quest Visual
* Word Lens
* Schemer
* Spaces
* Sparrow
* Talk
* Translate
* Translator Toolkit
* Voice
* Voice Local Search
* Wave

Search|

* Aardvark
* Alerts
* Answers
* Base
* BeatThatQuote.com
* Blog Search
* Books
* Ngram Viewer
* Code Search
* Data Commons
* Dataset Search
* Dictionary
* Directory
* Fast Flip
* Flu Trends
* Finance
* Goggles
* Google.by
* Images
* Image Labeler
* Image Swirl
* Kaltix
* Knowledge Graph
* Freebase
* Metaweb
* Like.com
* News
* Archive
* Weather
* Patents
* People Cards
* Personalized Search
* Public Data Explorer
* Questions and Answers
* SafeSearch
* Scholar
* Searchwiki
* Shopping
* Catalogs
* Express
* Squared
* Tenor
* Travel
* Flights
* Trends
* Insights for Search
* Voice Search
* WDYL

Navigation|

* Earth
* Endoxon
* ImageAmerica
* Maps
* Latitude
* Map Maker
* Navigation
* Pin
* Street View
* Coverage
* Trusted
* Waze
* Where Is My Train

Business
and finance|

* Ad Manager
* AdMob
* Ads
* Adscape
* AdSense
* Attribution
* BebaPay
* Checkout
* Contributor
* DoubleClick
* Affiliate Network
* Invite Media
* Marketing Platform
* Analytics
* Looker Studio
* Urchin
* Pay (mobile app)
* Wallet
* Pay (payment method)
* Send
* Tez
* PostRank
* Primer
* Softcard
* Wildfire Interactive
* Widevine

Organization
and productivity|

* Bookmarks
* Browser Sync
* Calendar
* Cloud Search
* Desktop
* Drive
* Etherpad
* fflick
* Files
* iGoogle
* Jamboard
* Notebook
* NotebookLM
* One
* Photos
* Quickoffice
* Quick Search Box
* Surveys
* Sync
* Tasks
* Toolbar

Docs Editors|

* Docs
* Drawings
* Forms
* Fusion Tables
* Keep
* Sheets
* Slides
* Sites
* Vids

Publishing|

* Apture
* Blogger
* Pyra Labs
* Domains
* FeedBurner
* One Pass
* Page Creator
* Sites
* Web Designer

Education|

* Classroom
* Grasshopper
* Socratic
* Photomath
* Read Along
* Toontastic 3D
* Workspace
* Marketplace

Others|

* Account
* Dashboard
* Takeout
* Android Auto
* Android Beam
* Arts & Culture
* Assistant
* Authenticator
* Body
* BufferBox
* Building Maker
* BumpTop
* Cast
* Cloud Print
* Crowdsource
* Digital Wellbeing
* Expeditions
* Family Link
* Find My Device
* Fit
* Google Fonts
* Gboard
* Gemini
* Gesture Search
* Impermium
* Knol
* Lively
* Live Transcribe
* MyTracks
* Nearby Share
* Now
* Offers
* Opinion Rewards
* Person Finder
* Poly
* Question Hub
* Quick Share
* Reader
* Safe Browsing
* Sidewiki
* SlickLogin
* Sound Amplifier
* Speech Recognition & Synthesis
* Station
* Store
* TalkBack
* Tilt Brush
* URL Shortener
* Voice Access
* Wavii
* Web Light
* WiFi

Chrome|

* Apps
* Chromium
* Dinosaur Game
* GreenBorder
* Remote Desktop
* Web Store
* V8

Images and
photography|

* Camera
* Lens
* Snapseed
* Nik Software
* Panoramio
* Photos
* Picasa
* Web Albums
* Picnik

Hardware

| Smartphones|

* Android Dev Phone
* Android One
* Nexus
* Nexus One
* S
* Galaxy Nexus
* 4
* 5
* 6
* 5X
* 6P
* Comparison
* Pixel
* Pixel
* 2
* 3
* 3a
* 4
* 4a
* 5
* 5a
* 6
* 6a
* 7
* 7a
* Fold
* 8
* 8a
* Pixel 9
* Pixel 9 Pro Fold
* Comparison
* Play Edition
* Project Ara

|

Laptops and tablets|

* Chromebook
* Nexus
* 7 (2012)
* 7 (2013)
* 10
* 9
* Comparison
* Pixel
* Chromebook Pixel
* Pixelbook
* Pixelbook Go
* C
* Slate
* Tablet

Wearables|

* Fitbit
* List of products
* Pixel Buds
* Pixel Watch
* Pixel Watch 2
* Pixel Watch 3
* Project Iris (unreleased)
* Virtual reality
* Cardboard
* Contact Lens
* Daydream
* Glass

Others|

* Chromebit
* Chromebox
* Clips
* Digital media players
* Chromecast
* Nexus Player
* Nexus Q
* Dropcam
* Liquid Galaxy
* Nest
* Smart Speakers
* Thermostat
* Wifi
* OnHub
* Pixel Visual Core
* Search Appliance
* Sycamore processor
* Tensor
* Tensor Processing Unit
* Titan Security Key

* v
* t
* e

Litigation

Advertising|

* Feldman v. Google, Inc. (2007)
* Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc. (2009)
* Goddard v. Google, Inc. (2009)
* Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc. (2012)
* Google, Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. (2017)
* Jedi Blue

Antitrust|

* European Union (2010–present)
* United States v. Adobe Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Intuit, Inc., and Pixar (2011)
* Umar Javeed, Sukarma Thapar, Aaqib Javeed vs. Google LLC and Ors. (2019)
* United States v. Google LLC (2020)
* United States v. Google LLC (2023)

Intellectual property|

* Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. and A9.com Inc. and Google Inc. (2007)
* Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. (2010)
* Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.(2015)
* Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. (2015)
* Field v. Google, Inc. (2016)
* Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021)
* Smartphone patent wars

Privacy|

* Rocky Mountain Bank v. Google, Inc. (2009)
* Hibnick v. Google, Inc. (2010)
* United States v. Google Inc. (2012)
* Judgement of the German Federal Court of Justice on Google's autocomplete function (2013)
* Joffe v. Google, Inc. (2013)
* Mosley v SARL Google (2013)
* Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González (2014)
* Frank v. Gaos (2019)

Other|

* Garcia v. Google, Inc. (2015)
* Google LLC v Defteros (2020)
* Epic Games v. Google (2021)
* Gonzalez v. Google LLC (2022)

* Category

Related

| Terms and phrases|

* "Don't be evil"
* Gayglers
* Google (verb)
* Google bombing
* 2004 U.S. presidential election
* Google effect
* Googlefight
* Google hacking
* Googleshare
* Google tax
* Googlewhack
* Googlization
* "Illegal flower tribute"
* Rooting
* Search engine manipulation effect
* Sitelink
* Site reliability engineering
* YouTube poop

|

Documentaries|

* AlphaGo
* Google: Behind the Screen
* Google Maps Road Trip
* Google and the World Brain
* The Creepy Line

Books|

* Google Hacks
* The Google Story
* Google Volume One
* Googled: The End of the World as We Know It
* How Google Works
* I'm Feeling Lucky
* In the Plex
* The Google Book
* The MANIAC

Popular culture|

* Google Feud
* Google Me (film)
* "Google Me" (Kim Zolciak song)
* "Google Me" (Teyana Taylor song)
* Is Google Making Us Stupid?
* Proceratium google
* Matt Nathanson: Live at Google
* The Billion Dollar Code
* The Internship
* Where on Google Earth is Carmen Sandiego?

Others|

* "Attention Is All You Need"
* elgooG
* Predictions of the end
* Registry
* .app (top-level domain)
* .dev
* g.co
* .google
* Pimp My Search
* Relationship with Wikipedia
* Sensorvault
* Stanford Digital Library Project

* Italics indicate discontinued products or services.
* Category
* Commons
* Outline
* WikiProject

* v
* t
* e

Ebooks

Formats|

* ePub
* FictionBook
* CBR/CBZ
* Kindle File Format
* Mobipocket
* PDF
* Plain text
* IBA

Reading|

| Devices|

* Amazon Kindle
* Barnes & Noble Nook
* Bookeen
* Elonex ebook
* enTourage eDGe
* Hanlin eReader
* iPad
* iRiver Story
* Kobo eReader
* Onyx Boox
* Plastic Logic Reader
* PocketBook eReader
* Rocket eBook
* SoftBook
* Smartphones
* Tablets

|

Software|

* Adobe Acrobat
* Adobe Digital Editions
* Aldiko
* Apple Books (iBooks)
* Aquafadas
* Blio
* Bluefire Reader
* Calibre
* FBReader
* Foliate
* Google Play Books
* Kindle app
* Kitabu
* Kobo
* Lector
* Lektz
* Lucifox
* Microsoft Reader
* MuPDF
* Okular
* OverDrive Media Console
* Snapplify
* STDU Viewer
* Sumatra PDF

Editing|

* ABBYY FineReader
* AbiWord
* Adobe InDesign
* Adobe RoboHelp
* Aquafadas
* Atlantis Word Processor
* Booktype
* Calibre
* Calligra Author
* Collabora Online
* eXeLearning
* Help & Manual
* HelpNDoc
* iBooks Author
* iStudio Publisher
* LaTeX
* LibreOffice
* MadCap Flare
* Oxygen XML Editor
* PagePlus
* Pages
* QuarkXPress
* Scrivener
* Sigil
* Writer2epub

Vendors|

| Commercial|

* Apple Books Store
* Amazon Kindle Store
* Baen Free Library
* Barnes & Noble
* Booktrack
* BookWalker
* Feedbooks
* Google
* Google Play
* Google Books
* Jarir.com
* Kobo Bookstore
* Sony Reader Store
* Smashwords

|

Noncommercial|

* Aozora Bunko
* Faded Page
* HathiTrust
* Internet Archive
* Project Gutenberg
* Australia
* Canada
* Standard Ebooks
* Wikisource

Related|

* Academic journal publishing reform
* Books
* Braille e-book
* Comparison of ebook readers
* Comparison of iOS ebook reader software
* Comparison of Android ebook reader software
* E-book lending
* Electronic publishing
* iBooks Author Conference
* International Digital Publishing Forum
* Kindle single
* OPDS
* Reflowable document
* Self-publishing
* Semantic publishing

* v
* t
* e

Books

Production|

* Binding
* Covers
* dust jackets
* Design
* Editing
* Illustration
* Illuminated manuscripts
* Printing
* edition
* history
* incunabula
* instant book
* limited edition
* Publishing
* advance copy
* hardcover
* paperback
* Size
* Typesetting
* Volume (bibliography)
* Collection (publishing)
* Book series

Consumption|

* Awards
* Bestsellers
* list
* Bibliography
* Bibliomania (tsundoku)
* Bibliophilia
* Bibliotherapy
* Bookmarks
* Bookselling
* blurbs
* book towns
* history
* used
* Censorship
* Clubs
* Collecting
* Digitizing
* Bookworm (insect)
* Furniture
* bookcases
* bookends
* Library
* Print culture
* Reading
* literacy
* Reviews

By country|

* Brazil
* France
* Germany
* Italy
* Japan
* Netherlands
* Pakistan
* Spain
* United Kingdom
* United States

Other|

* Genres
* fictional
* miniature
* pop-up
* textbook
* Grimoire
* Formats
* audiobooks
* Ebooks
* Folio
* Coffee table book

Related|

* Banned books
* Book burning
* incidents
* Nazi
* Book curses
* Book packaging
* Book swapping
* Book tour
* Conservation and restoration
* Dog ears
* History of books
* scroll
* codex
* Intellectual property
* ISBN
* Novel
* Outline
* Preservation
* The Philobiblon
* World Book Day
* World Book Capital

* Outline
* Category
* Portal

Authority control databases: National |

* Germany
* Czech Republic

|

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template