Civic technology companies

Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

Civic technology companies are platforms, products, and services that facilitate civic engagement.[1][unreliable source?][2][unreliable source?][3][unreliable source?] Civic technology encompasses any type of technology that enables greater participation in government affairs, or "assists government in delivering citizen services and strengthening ties with the public".[4][unreliable source?] The phrase can essentially be used to describe any company that is concerned with improving the quality, access, and efficiency of government services within the political system through technological means.[2][unreliable source?] Although similar, Civic Technology is different from Government Technology.[5][unreliable source?] Civic technology seeks to connect citizens with each other or with their government.[6][unreliable source?] Government Technology primarily seeks to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of governments' internal operations.[5][unreliable source?] Although the term can be used differently, Government Technology can also be classified as a subcategory within civic technology due to the indirect benefits citizens gain from government efficiency.[7][unreliable source?]

## Categories of these companies[edit]

Most current civic technology companies fall under a few categories. First is Government Technology, which is technology used by nations to either increase the efficiency of their operations or to enhance their connection to citizens.[7][unreliable source?] Another category is Advocacy, which is made up of civic technology companies used for political or social purposed by non-government groups.[7][unreliable source?] The last main category is Voting, which encompasses companies that seek to improve voting systems.[7][unreliable source?]

## Civic technology organizations[edit]

This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "Civic technology companies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

Platform Name  | Founder  | Dates Created  | Open Source  | Corporate Structure

|
|
|
|

VotingWorks | Ben Adida  | 2018  | Open  | Non-profit
Pol.is |  |  | Open  | Non-profit
Gov Tech  | Jacqueline Poh[8] | 2016  | Open  | Non-Profit
Bang the Table  | Matthew Crozier and Crispin Butteriss[9] | 2008  | Open  | Non-Profit
City Innovate  | Kamran Saddique[10] | 2015  | Open  | Non-Profit
Code for America | Jennifer Pahlka[11] | 2009  | Open  | Non-Profit
coUrbanize  | Karin Brandt[12] | 2013  | Open  | Non-Profit
OpenGov  | Zachary Bookman[13] | 2012  | Open  | Non-Profit
Accela  | Gary Kovacs[14] | 2018  | Open  | For-Profit
CityBase  | Mike Duffy[15] | 2013  | Open  | Non-Profit
MuniSight  | Greg Berger[16] | 2017  | Open  | For-Profit
Nava  | Rohan Bhobe  | 2015  | Open  | Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)
Nextdoor  | Nirav Tolia, Sarah Leary, Prakash Janakiraman and David Wiesen[17] | 2008  | Open  | Non-Profit
Fiscal Note | Timothy Hwang, Gerald Yao, and Jonathan Chen[18] | 2013  | Open  | For-Profit
Maptionnaire  | Maarit Kahila, Anna Broberg[19] | 2011  | Not  | For-Profit

## Division of funding by company type[edit]

Data on investment provided for civic technology companies from 2011 to 2013 offers insight into the current landscape of these technology companies. Data collected by the Knight Foundation in this time period analyzed the difference in funding between Open Government and Community Action civic technology companies.[20] The Knight Foundation defines Open Government oriented companies as promoting citizen participation in government and Community Action companies as technology companies seeking to empower and unify citizens with a bottom-down approach.[20] Of investment in this time period, Community Action civic technology companies received more funds than Open Government oriented civic technology companies.[20] Within Community Action companies, Neighborhood Forums and P2P Local Sharing received most of the investment funds.[20] Within Open Government civic technology companies, Data Access & Transparency companies and Resident Feedback companies received the largest share of investments within the Open Government category.[20]

Illustration of 3 main sections of civic technology companies. Inspiration from Samsonowa&Partners infographic

## Possible future directions for civic technology companies[edit]

As of 2021, various trends highlight the potential areas for growth civic technology can expand into. While many businesses assess data in real time, many governments lack the online infrastructure for this capability.[21] Civic technology could play a pivotal role in more robust and frequent government data collection for its citizens.[21] The gains of SpaceX highlighted the role private companies could play in developing technology for further space endeavors in coordination with the government.[22] Furthermore, governments' increasing reliance on technology such as drones and software for military units show potential for military-focused civic technology companies to work with Governments.[22] In the current landscape of civic technology companies, there remains potential for civic technology companies to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion for the community or communities they target.[23][unreliable source?] Civic technology could also connect younger citizens with their government.[24][unreliable source?] Specifically, since age groups under 30 primarily engage in their democracy through social media or other online platforms, online based civic technology companies could possibly increase engagement from these younger age groups.[24][unreliable source?] Furthermore, issues ranging from increasing school violence to increasing local environmental preservation concerns could also create high demand for civic technology companies to address these issues.[25][unreliable source?] Lastly, due to growing interest in and implementation of Participatory Budgeting and Citizens' Jury, there is greater demand and potential for civic technology companies that enable these practices on a massive scale.[26][unreliable source?]

## See also[edit]

* Comparison of civic technology platforms
* E-government
* Government Technology

## References[edit]

1. ^ Rowley, Jason (12 October 2016). "Civic Tech Faces Uphill Battle In Work To Build A Better Government And Society". MatterMark. MatterMark. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
2. ^ a b mheadd (16 April 2015). "Civic Tech: Days of Future Past". Civic.io. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
3. ^ Civic Ninjas. "Twitter List of Companies in Knight Foundation's Report on Civic Tech". Civic Ninjas. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
4. ^ Wood, Colin (15 August 2016). "What is Civic Tech?". Gov Tech. eRepublic. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
5. ^ a b "What's the Difference Between "Civic Tech" and "GovTech"?". CitizenLab's Blog. 2019-08-29. Retrieved 2021-11-09.
6. ^ "Exploring Civic Tech and Gov Tech - WeSolve". 20 March 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-09.
7. ^ a b c d Poppert, Derek (2021-05-07). "Navigating the field of civic tech". Tradecraft. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
8. ^ "About Us". GovTech. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
9. ^ "Bang the Table – Participedia". participedia.net. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
10. ^ "Team". www.cityinnovate.com. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
11. ^ "Jennifer Pahlka". Code for America. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
12. ^ Spanring, Christian. "coUrbanize | Press & Awards | Read about the work we're doing". coUrbanize. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
13. ^ "About OpenGov - The Leader in Cloud Technology for Government". OpenGov. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
14. ^ Gary, Kovacs. "Gary Kovacs Linkedin Page".
15. ^ John, Pletz (2019-07-10). "Tech 50 - Mike Duffy, 41". Crain's Chicago Business. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
16. ^ Falconer, Justin (2017-05-04). "Announcing MuniSight!". MuniSight. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
17. ^ "Join Nextdoor, an app for neighborhoods where you can get local tips, buy and sell items, and more". nextdoor.com. Retrieved 2022-11-07.
18. ^ "Global Policy and Market Intelligence". FiscalNote. Retrieved 2022-11-07.
19. ^ "About Maptionnaire, Citizen Engagement Platform". Maptionnaire. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
20. ^ a b c d e "Knight Foundation: Trends in Civic Tech". www.knightfoundation.org. Retrieved 2021-11-09.
21. ^ a b Bookman, Zac (September 2015). "5 tech trends that will transform governments". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2021-11-10.
22. ^ a b Sullivan, Mark (2021-06-04). "Forget ad optimization: This VC wants to invest in startups working on real problems". Fast Company. Retrieved 2021-11-09.
23. ^ "U.S. civic tech, ten years in: Building on progress to tap civic tech's full potential". luminategroup.com. Retrieved 2021-11-10.
24. ^ a b food, Jenna Schroedel Marketing Intern at CitizenLab ~ Lover of all things; film; Away, Far (2020-10-09). "Trends for youth civic engagement: online, inclusive, and local". CitizenLab's Blog. Retrieved 2021-11-10.
25. ^ "The Untapped Potential of Civic Technology". Giving Compass. 2019-01-22. Retrieved 2021-11-09.
26. ^ "Visions of Government in 2040: The Future of Civic Engagement | IBM Center for The Business of Government". www.businessofgovernment.org. Retrieved 2021-11-10.