Civil Harassment Restraining Order

Legal order in California

California law

Great Seal of California

Constitution

* Propositions (list)
* Offices

Codes

* Civil
* Civil Procedure
* Evidence
* Health and Safety
* Insurance
* Labor
* Penal
* Vehicle

Note: There are 29 California codes.
Courts of record

* Supreme Court
* Courts of Appeal
* Superior courts

Areas

* Adoption
* Bicycles
* Criminal law
* Capital punishment
* Cannabis
* Drugs
* Taxation
* Gambling
* Gun law

Civil procedural law

* Administrative Procedure Act
* Bagley-Keene Act
* California Style Manual
* Civil Harassment Restraining Order
* Special motion to strike
* Ordinary and administrative mandate

Tort law

* Cumis counsel
* Duty to protect students
* Informed consent
* Negligent infliction of emotional distress
* Peculiar risk doctrine
* Pure comparative negligence
* Tarasoff liability
* Strict product liability
* Tort Claims Act

Civil rights law

* Prop 209 (public affirmative action ban)
* SB 54 (sanctuary law)
* Act to Save Lives
* Art Preservation Act
* Celebrities Rights Act
* End of Life Option Act
* Fair Employment and Housing Act
* Fair procedure
* Public Records Act
* Shield Law
* Free speech on privately owned property
* Unruh Civil Rights Act

Criminal law

* .50 Caliber BMG Regulation Act of 2004
* AB 962 (handgun ammunition sales)
* AB 1471 (firearm microstamping)
* Adequate provocation
* Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act
* Felony petty theft
* Felony murder
* Marsden motion
* Murgia motion (selective prosecution)
* Murder
* Romero motion
* Uniform Determinate Sentencing Act of 1976

Laws concerning political subdivisions of the state

* AB 811 (energy efficiency zoning)
* Housing Accountability Act
* Brown Act
* Marks-Roos (joint powers authorities)
* Mello-Roos (local tax districts)
* Mills Act (historic structure preservation)

Environmental law

* 2008 Statewide Truck and Bus Rule
* California Environmental Quality Act
* California Water Plan
* Electronic Waste Recycling Act
* Endangered Species Act
* Hodge decision
* Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

Labor law

* Prop 22 (rideshare drivers as contractors)
* AB 5 (independent contractors)
* Agricultural Labor Relations Act
* AB 1066 (equal overtime for farmworkers)
* California Rule (pensions)
* Child Actor's Bill
* De Havilland Law (seven year maximum on labor contracts)
* Paid Family Leave
* Talent Agencies Act

Family law

* Palimony
* Pereira accounting
* Van Camp accounting

Consumer protection law and building codes

* Prop 103 (insurance rates)
* Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone Act
* Building Standards Code (contains the Energy Code)
* Balloon Law
* California foie gras law
* Consumers Legal Remedies Act
* Consumer Privacy Act
* Technical Bulletin 117 (fire extinguishers)

Education law

* SB 277 (removing vaccine exemptions)
* California Student Free Expression Law
* DREAM Act
* Leonard Law
* School Success and Opportunity Act
* Vergara v. California

Miscellaneous

* AB 1215 (automobile titling)
* AB 1535 (naloxone prescription by pharmacists)
* Corporate Disclosure Act
* Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act
* Road Repair and Accountability Act

Historical laws

* Act for the Government and Protection of Indians
* Alien Land Law of 1913
* Consenting Adult Sex Bill
* Criminal Syndicalism Act
* Sanitary Ordinance

A Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHO) is a form of restraining order or order of protection used in the state of California. It is a legal intervention in which a person who is deemed to be harassing, threatening or stalking another person is ordered to stop, with the goal of reducing risk of further threat or harm to the person being harassed. Some restraining orders are limited to domestic partners, but the CHO is not. It is frequently used with the purpose of preventing harassment by co-workers, neighbours, strangers and acquaintances.[1]

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6(b), in order to justify a CHO, the harassment must be "such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the victim."[2]

## Provisions and process

[edit]

A CHO can require the harasser to stop initiating contact with the victim, and/or to stay away from the victim's family, workplace, home, and/or school.[3]

A temporary CHO will be in effect until a court hearing can be held, normally within 15–22 days. A "final order" CHO, which may be granted following the court hearing, remains in effect for up to three years.[4]

A CHO does not go into effect until it is served to the person being restrained. Serving the CHO is the responsibility of the petitioner. Service can be carried out by the Sheriff's Department of the county where the harasser lives or works, or by any adult who is not a party named in the case.[3]

## Punishment for violation

[edit]

The crime of stalking is punishable in California by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison. The punishment for violating a CHO is 2–4 years of imprisonment.[1]

## Other types

[edit]

The CHO is one of six types of restraining orders used in California. The Emergency Protective Order, the Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Order and the Criminal Protective ("No Contact") Order, are aimed at protecting against domestic violence. The Elder or Dependent Adult Protective Order is aimed at protecting victims who are over 65 years old and/or who have certain disabilities. The Workplace Violence Restraining Order is aimed at protecting employees from violence in the workplace.[1] Several hundred thousand restraining orders are in effect in California at any time, and between 80 and 95 per cent cover domestic violence involving adults.[5]

## Effectiveness

[edit]

Experts disagree on whether restraining orders are effective in preventing further harassment. A 2010 analysis published in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law reviewed 15 U.S. studies of restraining order effectiveness, and concluded that restraining orders "can serve a useful role in threat management."[6] However, a 2002 analysis of 32 U.S. studies found that restraining orders are violated an average of 40 per cent of the time and are perceived as being "followed by worse events" almost 21 per cent of the time, and concluded that "evidence of [restraining orders'] relative efficacy is lacking," and that they may pose some degree of risk.[7] A large America-wide telephone survey conducted in 1998 found that, of stalking victims who obtained a restraining order, more than 68 per cent reported it being violated by their stalker.[8]

Threat management experts are often suspicious of restraining orders, believing they may escalate or enrage stalkers. In his 1997 book The Gift Of Fear, well-known American security specialist Gavin de Becker characterized restraining orders as "homework assignments police give to women to prove they're really committed to getting away from their pursuers," and said they "clearly serve police and prosecutors," but "they do not always serve victims."[9]

## References

[edit]

1. ^ a b c Lane, Lindsay. "ASUC Student Legal Clinic". Domestic Violence, Restraining Orders and Stalking. Associated Students of the University of California. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
2. ^ "CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 525-534". The Legislative Counsel of California. Archived from the original on 30 October 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
3. ^ a b "Civil Harassment Restraining Order". Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
4. ^ "Civil Harassment Orders". Women'sLaw.Org. National Network to end Domestic Violence. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
5. ^ Sorenson, Susan B.; Haika Shen (July 2005). "Restraining Orders in California: A Look at Statewide Data" (PDF). Violence Against Women. 7. 11 (7): 912–933\. doi:10.1177/1077801205276944. PMID 16043577. S2CID 39711827. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2011. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
6. ^ Benitez, MD, Christopher T.; Dale E. McNiel; Renée L. Binder (2010). "Do Protection Orders Protect?". Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 3. 38 (3): 376–385\. PMID 20852224. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
7. ^ Spitzberg, Brian H. (October 2002). "The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management". Trauma, Violence and Abuse. 4. 3 (4): 261–288\. doi:10.1177/1524838002237330. S2CID 146721263.
8. ^ Tjaden, P.; Thoennes, N. (April 1998). "Stalking In America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey". National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NCJ 169592): 1–19.
9. ^ De Becker, Gavin (1997). The Gift Of Fear And Other Survival Signals That Will Protect Us From Violence. New York: Dell Publishing. pp. 223–229\. ISBN 0-440-22619-8.