Comparison of multi-model databases

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Comparison of multi-model databases" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).

Database | SQL | Document | Graph | Object | License | Transactions

|
|
|
|
|
|

ArangoDB | No | Yes | Yes | No | Business Source License 1.1 | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability[1]
Azure Cosmos DB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models
CrateDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Apache 2 License | Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control
EnterpriseDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID
Informix | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, multiple consistency models, configurable durability
MarkLogic | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID
OrientDB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Apache 2 License | Full ACID, even distributed
SAP HANA | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID
Virtuoso | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary or GNU GPL v2 | Full ACID

## See also

[edit]

* Comparison of structured storage software

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "Transactions". docs.arangodb.com. Retrieved 2025-06-19.