Comparison of multi-model databases

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Comparison of multi-model databases" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).

Database | SQL | Document | Graph | Object | License | Transactions

|
|
|
|
|
|

ArangoDB | No | Yes | Yes | No | Business Source License 1.1 | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability
Azure Cosmos DB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models
CrateDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Apache 2 License | Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control
EnterpriseDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID
MarkLogic | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID
OrientDB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Apache 2 License | Full ACID, even distributed
SAP HANA | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID
Virtuoso | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary or GNU GPL v2 | Full ACID

## See also

[edit]

* Comparison of structured storage software