Dark Enlightenment

Anti-democratic, reactionary philosophy

Not to be confused with Counter-Enlightenment or Intellectual dark web.

Part of a series on

Neo-fascism

Principles

* Actual idealism
* Ultranationalism
* Ethnic nationalism
* White nationalism
* White supremacy

Variants

* Ecofascism
* Identitarianism
* Neo-Legionarism
* Neo-Nazism
* esoteric
* Ruscism
* Third Position

Origins

* Clerical fascism
* Fascism
* Italian
* British
* Nazism
* National syndicalism
* Kokkashugi
* Strasserism
* Falangism

Movements and organizations

* Australia First Party
* Britain First
* International Third Position
* CasaPound
* Forza Nuova
* Avanguardia Nazionale
* Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari
* Ordine Nero
* Ordine Nuovo
* Deutsche Reichspartei
* Freedom and Direct Democracy
* Golden Dawn
* National Party – Greeks
* Spartans (Greek political party)
* Grey Wolves
* People's Party Our Slovakia
* National Action (UK)
* National Front (UK)
* National Movement (Poland)
* Nationalist Movement Party
* Our Homeland Movement
* Patriot Front
* Proud Boys
* Republic Movement
* Social-National Assembly
* Union Movement

History

* 1967 Greek coup d'état
* Armed, far-right organizations in Italy
* Borghese coup
* 1981 Spanish coup attempt
* Unite the Right rally
* Unite the Right 2

* Politics portal

* v
* t
* e

This article is part of a series on

Libertarianism
in the United States

Schools

* Agorism
* Anarcho-capitalism
* Austro
* Authoritarian
* Autarchism
* Bleeding-heart
* Christian
* Conservative
* Consequentialist
* Feminist
* Fusionism
* Geo
* Green
* Market anarchism
* Minarchism
* Natural-rights
* Neo
* Paleo
* Panarchism
* Paternalist
* Propertarianism
* Socialist
* Techno
* Transhumanist
* Voluntaryism

Principles

* Anti-imperialism
* Civil libertarianism
* Constitutionalism
* Counter-economics
* Decentralization
* Departurism
* Economic freedom
* Evictionism
* Free banking
* Free market
* Free-market environmentalism
* Free migration
* Free trade
* Free will
* Freedom of association
* Freedom of contract
* Freedom of speech
* Homestead principle
* Individuality
* Individualism
* Liberty
* Limited government
* Localism
* Marriage privatization
* Natural rights and legal rights
* Non-aggression principle
* Non-interventionism
* Non-politics
* Non-voting
* Open border
* Polycentric law
* Private defense agency
* Private property
* Public choice theory
* Restorative justice
* Right to bear arms
* Right to privacy
* Rugged Individualism
* Self-ownership
* Single tax
* Small government
* Spoiled ballot
* Spontaneous order
* Stateless society
* Tax resistance
* Title-transfer theory of contract
* Voluntary association
* Voluntary society

History

* Age of Enlightenment
* Abolitionism in the United States
* Classical liberalism
* Anti-Federalists
* Transcendentalism
* Individualist anarchism in the United States
* Old Right
* New Left
* New Right
* Freedom School

Economics

* Austrian School
* Economic liberalism
* Fiscal conservatism
* Georgism
* Laissez-faire
* Neoliberalism
* Supply-side economics

Intellectuals

* Andrews
* Barnett
* Block
* Boudreaux
* Brennan
* Caplan
* Carson
* Chamberlain
* Chartier
* Chodorov
* Cowen
* Ebeling
* Epstein
* Franklin
* D. Friedman
* M. Friedman
* P. Friedman
* R. Friedman
* Galambos
* Garrett
* George
* Griffin
* Gordon
* Harper
* Hazlitt
* Heinlein
* Hess
* Hoppe
* Hospers
* Huemer
* Jefferson
* Kinsella
* Konkin
* R. Lane
* Liggio
* LeFevre
* Machan
* Mencken
* Menger
* Mises
* Nock
* Nozick
* Paterson
* Rand
* Raico
* Read
* Robertson
* Rockwell
* Rothbard
* Samuels
* Schulman
* Sciabarra
* Scott
* Skousen
* Smith
* Spooner
* Somin
* Sowell
* Sumner
* Sutton
* Szasz
* Taleb
* Thoreau
* Tuccille
* Tucker
* Volokh
* Wilder
* Williams
* Wilson (Clyde)
* Wilson (Robert)

Politicians

* Amash
* Barr
* Brakey
* Burt
* Chafee
* Cleveland
* Flake
* Goldwater
* Jacobs
* Johnson
* Jorgensen
* Lee
* Massie
* McAfee
* Nolan
* Oliver
* Paul (Rand)
* Paul (Ron)
* Polis
* Sanford
* Sarwark
* Sununu
* Ventura
* Weld
* Wu

Commentators

* Chamberlain
* Gillespie
* Gutfeld
* Jones
* Kauffman
* McElroy
* Miller
* Napolitano
* Postrel
* Pugsley
* Rogan
* Smith
* Soave
* Stone
* Stossel
* Welch
* Will
* Woods

Activists

* Ben Garrison
* Jillette
* Koch (Charles)
* Koch (David)
* Prince
* Teller
* Thiel

Literature

* The Anarchist Cookbook
* Anarchy, State, and Utopia
* The Betrayal of the American Right
* The Case Against Education
* Civil Disobedience
* Conceived in Liberty
* The Creature from Jekyll Island
* Defending the Undefendable
* The Discovery of Freedom
* End the Fed
* The Ethics of Liberty
* For a New Liberty
* Free to Choose
* The Future and Its Enemies
* The God of the Machine
* It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand
* Liberty
* The Machinery of Freedom
* Man, Economy and State
* The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
* The Mainspring of Human Progress
* The Market for Liberty
* The Myth of the Rational Voter
* No, They Can't
* No Treason
* New Libertarian Manifesto
* Our Enemy, the State
* The Problem of Political Authority
* Progress and Poverty
* Protection or Free Trade
* Radicals for Capitalism
* Seeing Like a State
* To Serve and Protect
* The Unconstitutionality of Slavery

Issues

* Abortion
* Capital punishment
* Criticism
* Foreign affairs
* Immigration
* Intellectual property
* Internal debates
* LGBT rights
* Objectivism
* Political parties
* Politics
* State
* Theories of law

Symbols

* Come and take it
* Gadsden flag

Idols

* Ron Swanson
* Patrick Bateman
* Walter White

Organizations

* Cato Institute
* Federalist Society
* Free State Project
* Foundation for Economic Education
* International Alliance of Libertarian Parties
* Libertarian Party
* Liberty International
* Mises Institute
* Reason Foundation
* Reason (magazine)
* Students for a Democratic Society
* Students for Liberty
* Young Americans for Liberty

Movements

* American militia movement
* Boogaloo movement
* Dark Enlightenment
* Objectivist movement
* Objectivism
* Sovereign citizen movement

Comparable

* Libertarianism in Hong Kong
* Libertarianism in the United Kingdom (England)

Related

* Conservatism in the United States
* Left-libertarianism
* Liberalism in the United States
* Libertarian Democrat
* Libertarian Republican
* Libertarian science fiction
* On Democracy in America
* Outline of libertarianism
* Right-libertarianism

* Liberalism portal
* Conservatism portal
* Libertarianism portal
* United States portal

* v
* t
* e

The Dark Enlightenment, also called the neo-reactionary movement (abbreviated to NRx), is an anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian,[1] and reactionary philosophical and political movement.[2] A reaction against Enlightenment values,[3][4][5][6][7][8] it favors a return to traditional societal constructs and forms of government such as absolute monarchism and cameralism.[5] Influenced by libertarianism, the movement advocates for authoritarian capitalist city-states which compete for citizens. Neoreactionaries refer to contemporary liberal society and institutions which they oppose as 'the Cathedral', associating them with the Puritan church, and their goals of egalitarianism and democracy as "the Synopsis". They claim that the Cathedral influences public discourse to promote progressivism and political correctness,[9][10] which they view as a threat to Western civilization.[4][2] The movement also espouses scientific racism, a pseudoscientific view which they claim is suppressed by the Cathedral.[9][10][11][12]

Curtis Yarvin began constructing the basis of the ideology in the late 2000s, with Nick Land elaborating and coining the term "Dark Enlightenment". The movement has also had contributions from figures such as venture capitalist Peter Thiel. Despite criticism, the movement has gained traction with parts of Silicon Valley as well as several political figures associated with United States President Donald Trump, including political strategist Steve Bannon, Vice President JD Vance, and Michael Anton.

The Dark Enlightenment has been described as part of the alt-right, as its theoretical branch,[13][14] and as neo-fascist.[13][15][16][17] It has been described as the most significant political theory within the alt-right,[2] as "key to understanding" the alt-right political ideology,[2] and as providing a philosophical basis for considerable amounts of alt-right political activity.[18] University of Chichester professor Benjamin Noys described it as "an acceleration of capitalism to a fascist point". Land disputes the similarity between his ideas and fascism, claiming that "Fascism is a mass anti-capitalist movement", whereas he prefers that "capitalist corporate power should become the organizing force in society".[13] Historians Angela Dimitrakaki and Harry Weeks tie the Dark Enlightenment to neofascism via Land's "capitalist eschatology" which they describe as supported by the supremacist theories of fascism.[19] Neoreactionary ideas have also been described as "feudalist"[9] and "techno-feudalist".[6][7]

## History

[edit]

Curtis Yarvin

Neo-reactionaries are an informal community of bloggers and political theorists who have been active since the 2000s. Steve Sailer and Hans-Hermann Hoppe are contemporary forerunners of the ideology, which is also heavily influenced by the political thought of Thomas Hobbes, Thomas Carlyle, and Julius Evola.[6][10][20]: 1  In 2007 and 2008, software engineer Curtis Yarvin, writing under the pen name Mencius Moldbug, articulated what would develop into Dark Enlightenment thinking. Yarvin's theories were elaborated and expanded by philosopher Nick Land, who first coined the term "Dark Enlightenment" in his essay of the same name.[10][21][22][20]

By mid-2017, NRx had moved to forums such as the Social Matter online forum, the Hestia Society, and Thermidor Magazine. In 2021, Yarvin appeared on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Today, where he discussed the United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan and his concept of the 'Cathedral', which he claims to be the current aggregation of political power and influential institutions that is controlling the country.[23] Emerson Brooking, an expert in online extremism, said that “Yarvin escaped the fringe blogosphere because he wrapped deeply anti-American, totalitarian ideas in the language of U.S. start-up culture.”[24]

### Influence in government

[edit]

This section needs expansion with: info on more Silicon Valley supporters than just Thiel. You can help by adding to it. (June 2025)

|

Several prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians have expressed their influence from the philosophy. Steve Bannon has read and admired Yarvin's work, and there have been allegations that he has communicated with Yarvin which Yarvin has denied.[25][9][11] Bannon would later consider Yarvin an enemy, which Yarvin did not reciprocate.[26] Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump's second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin's ideas,[27] and Yarvin has claimed to have given staffing recommendations to him.[26] In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was "an informal guest of honor" due to his "outsize influence over the Trumpian right."[26] Marc Andreessen has quoted Yarvin and referred to him as a "friend",[7] also investing in his startup Tlon and urging people to read him.[8]

According to historian of conservatism Joshua Tait, "Moldbug's relationship with the investor-entrepreneur Thiel is his most important connection."[28] Max Chafkin described Yarvin as the "house political philosopher" for Thiel's circle of influence (or "Thielverse"),[29][30] including people such as Blake Masters, and Yarvin has referred to Thiel as "fully enlightened".[29][8] Vanity Fair noted that both have been influential in the New Right and the National Conservatism Conference.[29] Thiel had also invested in Yarvin's Tlon.[8]

U.S. Vice President JD Vance has cited Yarvin as an influence[31][32][33] and has connections to Thiel.[30][29] Prior to his election to the Vice Presidency, JD Vance cited in his 2022 Senate Campaign Yarvin's "strongman plan to 'retire all government employees,' which goes by the jaunty mnemonic 'RAGE.'"[34] In a 2021 interview, "Vance said Trump should 'fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, and replace them with our people. And when the courts stop you, stand before the country and say, The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’”[35] Yarvin has praised Vance, stating "in almost every way, JD is perfect", but also considered his relationship with Vance overstated by the media, as they've rarely communicated. He also praised Trump for breaking from Republican practices of trying to "play ball and help the system work" and instead "trying to move all of the levers of this machine that he can move", though also stating "what he’s doing is not at all what I would do with an opportunity like this. But I think that what I would do is probably not possible."[26]

It has been suggested that the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, bears resemblance to RAGE, as advocated for by Yarvin.[35][7] Land, when asked by the Financial Times if he approved of DOGE, said "the answer is definitely yes", having also endorsed Steve Bannon's goal of "deconstruction of the administrative state".[36] In a report by The Washington Post, two DOGE advisors described Yarvin as an "intellectual beacon" for the department, with one saying, "It's an open secret that everyone in policymaking roles has read Yarvin."[24] The report said that Yarvin, initially approving of the Trump administration, had become critical of DOGE. He cited its handling of the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health, stating "Instead of fighting against these people because they’re an enemy class who votes for the Democrats, you [should be] saying, 'Oooh, we have cookies for you.'"[24] However, Tait said that Yarvin bears some responsibility for DOGE, saying, "It would have been created, probably, regardless. But he spent a good chunk of time creating a justifying framework for it."[24] Political philosopher Danielle Allen said that DOGE is clearly based on Yarvin's work, and the outcome was the natural result of the shortcomings in Yarvin's views.[24]

CNN notes that Thiel, Andreessen, Vance and Anton don't deny that they are listening to Yarvin, but they have indicated that they do not accept all of Yarvin theories:

> An advisor to Vance denied the vice president has a close relationship with Yarvin, saying the two have met 'like once.' Thiel, who did not respond to a request for comment, told The Atlantic in 2023 he didn't think Yarvin's ideas would 'work' but found him to be an 'interesting and powerful' historian. And earlier this year [2025], Andreessen, who also did not respond to a request for comment, posted on X that one can read 'Yarvin without becoming a monarchist.'[37]

## Beliefs

[edit]

### Opposition to democracy

[edit]

Central to neoreactionarism's ideas is a belief in freedom's incompatibility with democracy, with Land having stated "Democracy tends to fascism".[9] Yarvin and Land drew inspiration from libertarians such as Thiel; Thiel had claimed that the West needed a new political system in the face of 9/11, which he considered to mark the failure of the Enlightenment, and stated "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible".[9][3][4] Yarvin told Vanity Fair "The fundamental premise of liberalism is that there is this inexorable march toward progress. I disagree with that premise."[29] A 2016 article in New York magazine notes that "Neoreaction has a number of different strains, but perhaps the most important is a form of post-libertarian futurism that, realizing that libertarians aren't likely to win any elections, argues against democracy in favor of authoritarian forms of government."[18]

Journalist Andrew Sullivan writes that neoreaction's pessimistic appraisal of democracy dismisses many advances that have been made and that global manufacturing patterns also limit the economic independence that sovereign states can have from one another.[38]

### Support for authoritarianism

[edit]

Yarvin supports authoritarianism on right-libertarian grounds, claiming that the division of political sovereignty expands the scope of the state, whereas strong governments with clear hierarchies remain minimal and narrowly focused.[39] Yarvin's "A Formalist Manifesto" advocates for a form of "neocameralism" in which small, authoritarian "gov-corps" coexist and compete with each other, an idea anticipated by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.[40][9][10][36] He claims freedom under the system, known as the "Patchwork",[41][30] would be guaranteed by the ability to "vote with your feet", whereby residents could leave for another gov-corp if they felt it would provide a higher quality of life, thus forcing competition. Land reiterates this with the political idea "No Voice, Free Exit", taken from Albert Hirschman's ideas of voice being democratic and exit being departure to another society:[9][42]

> "If gov-corp doesn’t deliver acceptable value for its taxes (sovereign rent), [citizens] can notify its customer service function, and if necessary take their custom elsewhere. Gov-corp would concentrate upon running an efficient, attractive, vital, clean, and secure country, of a kind that is able to draw customers."[3]

Yarvin has advocated for a "dictator-president" or "national CEO".[43] He has described himself as a royalist, monarchist, and Jacobite;[9][44] and has praised cameralism, Frederick the Great,[11][4][5] and Thomas Carlyle.[6] He is also influenced by Austrian economics,[6][9][8] particularly Hoppe,[10][6][9] Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard,[9] and Friedrich Hayek.[6] Ava Kofman credits Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed with pushing Yarvin away from standard libertarian thought, with authoritarianism scholar Julian Waller saying "it's not copy-and-pasted, but it is such a direct influence that it's kind of obscene".[8] Yarvin admires Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping for his pragmatic and market-oriented authoritarianism, and the city-state of Singapore as an example of a successful authoritarian regime. He sees the US as soft on crime, dominated by economic and democratic delusions.[39] He additionally cites Dubai and Hong Kong as providing a high quality of life without democracy, stating "as Dubai in particular shows, a government (like any corporation) can deliver excellent customer service without either owning or being owned by its customers."[41]

Andy Beckett stated that NRx supporters "believe in the replacement of modern nation-states, democracy and government bureaucracies by authoritarian city states, which on neoreaction blogs sound as much like idealised medieval kingdoms as they do modern enclaves such as Singapore."[45] Ana Teixeira Pinto describes the political ideology of the gov-corp model as a form of classical libertarianism, stating "they do not want to limit the power of the state, they want to privatise it."[46] According to criminal justice professor George Michael, neoreaction seeks to save its ideal of Western civilization through adoption of a monarchical, or CEO model of government to replace democracy.[47] Academic Jonathan Ratcliffe describes the model as "a network of hyper-capitalist city states ruled by authoritarian CEO monarchs."[44] Neoreactionary ideas have also been referred to as "feudalist"[9] and "techno-feudalist".[6][7] Yarvin's proposals are not fully detailed beyond philosophy and general principles,[44] and the economic ability to leave and the willingness of other locations to accept immigrants are not generally considered.[2] Andrew Jones criticized his arguments as "vaguely defined and often factually incorrect".[2]

#### The process of instituting authoritarianism

[edit]

Yarvin describes his proposals as a modern version of monarchy[44] and advocates for an American monarch dissolving elite academic institutions and media outlets within the first few months of their reign,[48] stating "if Americans want to change their government, they're going to have to get over their dictator phobia."[30] Time notes that Yarvin's proposal for a "Butterfly Revolution" envisions an internal coup to replace democracy with a privatized executive authority, which includes his RAGE proposal to "retire all government employees" in favor of loyalists.[7] While conceding that it may not be possible, he stated that, were he in Trump's position, he would take executive control of government institutions such as the Federal Reserve, keeping those "that have a very clear role and are not politicized in any way" while disposing of others such as the State Department. He advocates constitutionally challenging laws such as impoundment control, birthright citizenship, and Marbury v. Madison, potentially defying the courts if it were necessary and "unifying". However, he also stated "if you’re doing that in a situation where the vibe is like, 'This is going to be the first shot in the civil war between red America and blue America' [...] I think it’s bad", considering Trump and America "unready for that level of change".[26]

He suggested in a January 2025 New York Times interview that there was historical precedent to support his reasoning, asserting that in his first inaugural address, Franklin Delano Roosevelt "essentially says, Hey, Congress, give me absolute power, or I'll take it anyway. So did FDR actually take that level of power? Yeah, he did." The interviewer, David Marchese, remarked that "Yarvin relies on what those sympathetic to his views might see as a helpful serving of historical references — and what others see as a highly distorting mix of gross oversimplification, cherry-picking and personal interpretation presented as fact."[49] Scholars have described Yarvin's arguments as misrepresenting the historical record, and said that the historical autocracies he praises were considered deeply oppressive by their subjects.[24]

### The Cathedral

[edit]

Neoreactionaries refer to contemporary liberal society and institutions which they oppose as the 'Cathedral', considering them the descendant of the Puritan church, and their goals of egalitarianism and democracy as "the Synopsis". They claim that the Cathedral influences public discourse to promote progressivism and political correctness,[9][10] which they view as a threat to Western civilization.[4][2] Yarvin views it as an oligarchy of educated elites competing for status[29] and has accused Ivy League schools, The New York Times, and Hollywood of being members.[11][12]

Land and others argue that enforcement of political correctness by these institutions means that they are a religious entity, hence the term 'Cathedral'.[50] Yarvin, described by El País as a former progressive,[6] describes these institutions as a "twentieth-century version of the established church",[51] with the educational system as a method for indoctrinating people into the Cathedral, enforcing compliance with progressive ideology and preventing them from thinking for themselves.[51] Yarvin defines a church as "an organization or movement which tells people how to think", and includes schools as churches.[2]

According to neoreactionaries, the Cathedral's adoption of liberal humanism is the primary reason for an alleged decline of Western civilization.[2] A neoreactionary online dictionary defines the Cathedral as "the self-organizing consensus of Progressives and Progressive ideology represented by the universities, the media, and the civil service", with an agenda that includes "women’s suffrage, prohibition, abolition, federal income tax, democratic election of senators, labor laws, desegregation, popularization of drugs, destruction of traditional sexual norms, ethnic studies courses in colleges, decolonization, and gay marriage."[51][9]

The concept of the Cathedral has been described as "fundamental to the alt-right's understanding of the humanities".[2] Academic Andrew Woods describes the Cathedral as one of one of two central ideas that enable the alt-right to dismiss criticism, the other being cultural Marxism.[51] He writes that both ideas function to pre-emptively neutralize attempts at refutation, and that they are especially used to delegitimize critical theory. The Cathedral allegedly "seeks to delude the American public" while amassing power and influence, and critical theory is portrayed as the ideological justification for the pursuit of power. Progressive thought is seen as a disguise for power-seeking, and Woods says that Yarvin takes advantage of the inability to prove the unconscious desires of others to argue that "everyone's primary motivation in life is their craving for greater power."[51] El País compared the concept to QAnon and its claims of a deep state.[6]

### Race

[edit]

Neoreactionaries endorse scientific racism, a pseudoscientific view which they refer to as "human biodiversity". Land coined the term "hyperracism" to refer to his views on race; he believes that socioeconomic status is "a strong proxy for IQ" rather than race specifically (though he acknowledges a correlation between race and socioeconomic status), and that meritocracy, particularly space colonization, will "function as a highly-selective genetic filter" that propagates mostly (but not strictly) Whites and Asians.[9][10] Roger Burrows, writing for The Sociological Review, stated "In Land’s schema, the consumers ‘exiting’ from competing gov-corps quickly form themselves into, often racially based, microstates. Capitalist deterritorialization combines with ongoing genetic separation between global elites and the rest of the population resulting in complex new forms of ‘Human Bio-diversity’. He described Land's views as eugenicist and compared them to those of The Bell Curve.[42]

According to Land, the concepts of hate speech and hate crimes are simply methods to suppress ideas that contradict the Cathedral’s dogma. He says that statements described as "hate speech" are not related to hatred but are simply a type of defiance of the Cathedral's religious orthodoxy. The suppression is carried out by the "Media-Academic Complex" because the ideas are seen as reflecting a "heretical intention".[51]

Yarvin has stated "Although I am not a white nationalist, I am not exactly allergic to the stuff", believing it to simply be an ineffective tool for "the very real problems about which it complains."[52] Yarvin has endorsed arguments for Black racial inferiority and claimed they are being suppressed by the Cathedral.[11][12] He has claimed that some races are more suited to slavery than others[53] and has been described as a modern-day supporter of slavery, a description he disputes.[54][53]

### Accelerationism

[edit]

One of Land's goals with neoreactionarism is to drive accelerationism, viewing capitalism and technology as a way to destabilize existing systems and create radical change. Roger Burrows stated of Land's interpretation of Yarvin, "The Dark Enlightenment itself might be best thought of as the application of Land’s accelerationist framework to Molbug’s neocameralism."[42] Land views democratic and egalitarian policies as only slowing down acceleration and a technocapital singularity, stating "Beside the speed machine, or industrial capitalism, there is an ever more perfectly weighted decelerator [...] comically, the fabrication of this braking mechanism is proclaimed as progress. It is the Great Work of the Left."[12][9] Vincent Le states "If Land is attracted to Moldbug’s political system, it is because a neocameralist state would be free to pursue long-term technological innovation without the democratic politician’s need to appease short-sighted public opinion to be re-elected every few years."[55] Vox attributed such views to Land living in China's "techno-authoritarian political system" and his admiration for Deng Xiaoping and Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew.[12] Land has referred to Lee as an "autocratic enabler of freedom", and Yarvin has also praised Lee.[56] Yuk Hui stated "Land’s celebration of Asian cities such as Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Singapore is simply a detached observation of these places that projects onto them a common will to sacrifice politics for productivity".[4] Land has advocated for accelerationists to support the neoreactionary movement, though many have distanced themselves from him in response to his views on race.[45]

### Formalism

[edit]

In the inaugural article published on Unqualified Reservations in 2007, entitled "A Formalist Manifesto", Yarvin used the term "formalism" for his ideas, advocating for the formal recognition of the realities of existing power by aligning property rights with current political power as a solution to violence.[57][58] Courtney Hodrick, writing for Telos, stated "in his view, all politics are individual property relationships and the social contract is an agreement between citizen-consumers and governor-owners. Your consent to an agreement such as 'I won’t kill anyone on the street,' he explains, is 'just your agreement with whoever owns the street.' This agreement means that the owner of the street may use violence to enforce this agreement, just as individuals may use violence to defend their own property. His concern [...] is deciding who has the monopoly on the legitimate use of violence. But rather than concern himself with justifying legitimacy politically or metaphysically, Moldbug calls for a naturalization of existing property relations."[41] Yarvin describes the U.S. as "an big [sic] old company that holds a huge pile of assets, has no clear idea of what it’s trying to do with them, and is thrashing around like a ten-gallon shark in a five-gallon bucket",[44] advocating formalism as a solution:

> "To a formalist, the way to fix the US is to dispense with the ancient mystical horseradish, the corporate prayers and war chants, figure out who owns this monstrosity, and let them decide what in the heck they are going to do with it. I don't think it's too crazy to say that all options—including restructuring and liquidation—should be on the table."[59]

He rejects democracy as "ineffective and destructive" and attributes the successes of the post-WWII democratic system to its actually being "a mediocre implementation of formalism". He describes democratic politics as "a sort of symbolic violence, like deciding who wins the battle by how many troops they brought".[59] Rejecting pacifism for what he perceives as a tendency to advocate for the rectification of injustices instead of seeking an end to armed conflict, Yarvin promotes the adoption of classical approaches to international law and the idea of "formalising the military status quo"[60] as the most direct path to peace. He identifies the form of pacifism which prioritises "righteousness" instead of peace with the Calvinist doctrine of providence, and "ultracalvinism" as the ideological/theological basis for contemporary American interventionism.[61][62]

## Relation to other movements

[edit]

### Seasteading

[edit]

Prominent figures in the neoreactionary movement have connections to seasteading, the creation of sovereign city-states in international waters, which has been characterized as a way to execute the movement's ideas. Yarvin has connections to Patri Friedman, founder of The Seasteading Institute and grandson of Milton Friedman, and Thiel was once its main investor.[9][6][42] Thiel has also advocated the use of cyberspace, outer space, and the oceans to outstrip traditional politics via capitalism in order to realize libertarianism.[4] Land has quoted Friedman in stating that "free exit is so important that…it [is] the only Universal Human Right".[42]

### The Network State

[edit]

See also: City of Starbase Incorporation election and Free State Project

Balaji Srinivasan has proposed the Network State, a plan for technology executives and investors to remove themselves from democracy and create their own sovereign states.[63] Journalists have noted similarities of the Network State to Yarvin's ideas,[64][29] describing Srinivasan as a leader of the neoreactionary movement[63] and a friend of Yarvin.[8] Srinivasan had also messaged Yarvin suggesting potentially using the Dark Enlightenment audience to dox reporters.[65][8] Comparisons have also been made to Galt's Gulch from Atlas Shrugged[64][66] and Donald Trump's proposed "Freedom Cities".[67][68] Supporters include Marc Andreessen,[63][66][69][70][64] Garry Tan,[63][69] Peter Thiel,[66][69][70][71] Michael Moritz,[69] Patrick Collison,[69] Patri Friedman,[70][71] Roger Ver,[70] Naval Ravikant,[70][64] Joe Lonsdale,[71] Bryan Johnson,[71] the Winklevoss twins,[70][71] Sam Bankman-Fried,[70] Sam Altman,[66][72] Shervin Pishevar,[64] Brian Armstrong,[64] and Vitalik Buterin.[64] Proposed cities alleged to be examples of the Network State include California Forever,[69] Praxis,[69][70] Telosa,[69] Neom,[71] Liberland,[66] and Elon Musk's Starbase City.[73] Established cities alleged to be part of the Network state include Próspera in Honduras[70] and Itana in Nigeria.[70] Other locations of interest include Greenland,[74] French Polynesia,[71] Palau,[71][64] South Asia,[71] Ghana,[75] the Marshall Islands,[75] Panama,[75] the Bahamas,[64] Montenegro,[64] Costa Rica,[64] and Rhode Island.[76]

Cryptocurrency and Web3 are central components of the project.[71] Its legal framework also involves special economic zones,[71] and foreign investors have used Investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the case of Próspera.[77] The movement has been compared to Trumpism, with common ideologies including a belief in Strauss–Howe generational theory and hostility to left-wing politics, the news media and the administrative state.[71]

Critics have described these projects as a form of neocolonialism,[71][66][78] corporate monarchy[66] or white saviorism.[78]

The Highland Rim Project, located in Tennessee and Kentucky, is a Christian nationalist community influenced by the Network State and was proposed by New Founding, a Christian venture capital firm that received funding from Andreessen and is connected to the Network State venture capital firm Pronomos Capital.[79][80] The Guardian has noted the community's ties to far-right groups and white nationalism.[81]

### Surveillance capitalism

[edit]

See also: Surveillance capitalism

Mother Jones cites Clearview AI and its founder Hoan Ton-That (who were in connection with Thiel and Yarvin) as an example of the Dark Enlightenment or neoreactionary thinking's influence on the development of surveillance technology.[82] A 2025 anonymous letter of a group of self-described former followers of the neoreactionary movement warned that the movement advocated for "techno-monarchism" in which its ruler would use "data systems, artificial intelligence, and advanced algorithms to manage the state, monitor citizens, and implement policies." It further warned that Elon Musk, in the context of his actions at the Department of Government Efficiency, was working "for his own power and the broader neo-reactionary agenda."[83]

Yarvin has outlined a vision for San Francisco where public safety would be enforced by constant monitoring of residents and visitors via RFID, genotyping, iris scanning, security cameras, and transportation which would track its location and passengers, reporting all of it to the authorities. The New Republic described the proposed surveillance system as "Orwellian".[30]

### The alt-right

[edit]

The Dark Enlightenment has been described by journalists and commentators as part of the alt-right, as its theoretical branch.[13][14] Journalist and pundit James Kirchick states that "although neo-reactionary thinkers disdain the masses and claim to despise populism and people more generally, what ties them to the rest of the alt-right is their unapologetically racist element, their shared misanthropy and their resentment of mismanagement by the ruling elites".[84]

Scholar Andrew Jones wrote in 2019 that the Dark Enlightenment is the most significant political theory within the alt-right, and that it is "key to understanding" the alt-right political ideology.[2] "The use of affect theory, postmodern critiques of modernity, and a fixation on critiquing regimes of truth", Jones remarked, "are fundamental to NeoReaction (NRx) and what separates it from other Far-Right theory".[2] Moreover, Jones argues that Dark Enlightenment's fixation on aesthetics, history, and philosophy, as opposed to the traditional empirical approach, distinguishes it from related far-right ideologies.[2]

Historian Joe Mulhall, writing for The Guardian, described Land as "propagating very far-right ideas."[85] Despite neoreaction's limited online audience, Mulhall considers the ideology to have "acted as both a tributary into the alt-right and as a key constituent part [of the alt-right]."[85] Journalist Park MacDougald described neoreactionarism as providing a philosophical basis for considerable amounts of alt-right political activity.[18][86]

The term "accelerationism", originally referring to Land's technocapitalist ideas, has been re-interpreted by some into the use of racial conflict to cause societal collapse and the building of white ethnostates, which has been linked to several white nationalist terrorist attacks such as the 2019 Christchurch mosque massacres. Vox described Land's shift towards neoreactionarism, along with neoreactionarism crossing paths with the alt-right as another fringe right wing internet movement, as the likely connection point between far-right racial accelerationism and the otherwise unrelated technocapitalist term. They cited a 2018 Southern Poverty Law Center investigation which found users on the neo-Nazi blog The Right Stuff who cited neoreactionarism as an influence.[12] Land himself has called the neoreactionary movement "a prophetic warning about the rise of the Alt-Right".[9]

### Fascism

[edit]

Journalists and academics have described the Dark Enlightenment as neo-fascist.[13][15][16][17] University of Chichester professor Benjamin Noys described it as "an acceleration of capitalism to a fascist point". Land disputes the similarity between his ideas and fascism, claiming that "Fascism is a mass anti-capitalist movement", whereas he prefers that "capitalist corporate power should become the organizing force in society".[13] Historians Angela Dimitrakaki and Harry Weeks tie the Dark Enlightenment to neofascism via Land's "capitalist eschatology" which they describe as supported by the supremacist theories of fascism. Dimitrakaki and Weeks say that Land's Dark Enlightenment was "infusing theoretical jargon into Yarvin/Moldbug's blog 'Unqualified Reservations'".[19]

In The Sociological Review, Roger Burrows examined neoreaction's core tenets and described the ideology as "hyper-neoliberal, technologically deterministic, anti-democratic, anti-egalitarian, pro-eugenicist, racist and, likely, fascist", and describes the entire accelerationist framework as a faulty attempt at "mainstreaming ... misogynist, racist and fascist discourses".[42] He criticizes neoreaction's racial principles and its brazen "disavowal of any discourses" advocating for socio-economic equality and, accordingly, considers it a "eugenic philosophy" in favor of what Nick Land deems "hyper-racism".[42] Graham B. Slater wrote that neoreaction "aim[s] to solve the problems purportedly created by democracy through what ultimately amount to neo-fascist solutions."[17]

Land himself became interested in the Atomwaffen-affiliated theistic Satanist organization Order of Nine Angles (ONA) which adheres to the ideology of Neo-Nazi terrorist accelerationism, describing the ONA's works as "highly-recommended" in a blog post.[87][88]

In the contemporary art world, art historian Sven Lütticken says that the popularity of Land's concepts has made certain art centers in New York and London hospitable to trendy fascism.[89]

## See also

[edit]

* Libertarian authoritarianism – Political spectrum and theory
* Intellectual dark web – Commentators opposed to identity politics and political correctness
* Reactionary modernism – Political ideology characterized by embrace of technology and anti-Enlightenment thought
* Social Darwinism – Group of pseudoscientific theories and societal practices
* The Fourth Political Theory – 2009 book by Aleksandr Dugin
* Exit, Voice, and Loyalty – Book on economic and political theory

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Kindinger, Evangelia; Schmitt, Mark (4 January 2019). "Conclusion: Digital culture and the afterlife of white supremacist movements". The Intersections of Whiteness. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-11277-2. Retrieved 29 November 2022.
2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Jones, Andrew (2019). "From NeoReactionary Theory to the Alt-Right". In Battista, Christine M.; Sande, Melissa R. (eds.). Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 101–120\. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_6. ISBN 9783030187521. S2CID 197950589. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
3. ^ a b c Land, Nick (25 December 2012). "The Dark Enlightenment". The Dark Enlightmenent. Archived from the original on 25 September 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2014.
4. ^ a b c d e f g Hui, Yuk (April 2017). "On the Unhappy Consciousness of Neoreactionaries - Journal #81". www.e-flux.com. Archived from the original on 22 June 2024. Retrieved 18 February 2025.
5. ^ a b c Gray, Rosie (10 February 2017). "Behind the Internet's Anti-Democracy Movement". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 10 February 2017. Retrieved 15 February 2017.
6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Fanjul, Sergio C. (30 November 2024). "NRx: The (underground) movement that wants to destroy democracy". EL PAÍS English. Archived from the original on 11 February 2025. Retrieved 11 February 2025.
7. ^ a b c d e f Simon, Ed (24 March 2025). "What We Must Understand About the Dark Enlightenment Movement". TIME. Archived from the original on 31 March 2025. Retrieved 3 April 2025.
8. ^ a b c d e f g h Kofman, Ava (2 June 2025). "Curtis Yarvin's Plot Against America". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on 5 June 2025. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Haider, Shuja (28 March 2017). "The Darkness at the End of the Tunnel: Artificial Intelligence and Neoreaction". Viewpoint Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 January 2025. Retrieved 21 February 2025.
10. ^ a b c d e f g h Finley, Klint (22 November 2013). "Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 26 March 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
11. ^ a b c d e Matthews, Dylan (7 February 2017). "Neo-monarchist blogger denies he's chatting with Steve Bannon". Vox. Archived from the original on 25 June 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2025.
12. ^ a b c d e f Beauchamp, Zack (11 November 2019). "Accelerationism: the obscure idea inspiring white supremacist killers around the world". Vox. Archived from the original on 10 February 2025. Retrieved 21 February 2025.
13. ^ a b c d e f Goldhill, Olivia. "The neo-fascist philosophy that underpins both the alt-right and Silicon Valley technophiles". Quartz. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2018.
14. ^ a b Matthews, Dylan (25 August 2016). "The alt-right is more than warmed-over white supremacy. It's that, but way way weirder". Vox. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
15. ^ a b Sigl, Matt (2 December 2013). "The Dark Enlightenment: The Creepy Internet Movement You'd Better Take Seriously". Vocativ. Archived from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
16. ^ a b Parisot, Eric; Phiddian, Robert; Barclay, Katie (1 September 2024). "Dark Enlightenments: An Introduction". Eighteenth-Century Life. 48 (3): 1–6\. doi:10.1215/00982601-11309269. ISSN 0098-2601. Retrieved 17 April 2025.
17. ^ a b c Means, Alexander J.; Slater, Graham B. (4 March 2019). "The dark mirror of capital: on post-neoliberal formations and the future of education". Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 40 (2): 162–175\. doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1569876. ISSN 0159-6306. Retrieved 17 April 2025.
18. ^ a b c MacDougald, Park (14 June 2016). "Why Peter Thiel Wants to Topple Gawker and Elect Donald Trump". New York Magazine. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
19. ^ a b Dimitrakaki, Angela; Weeks, Harry (May 2019). "Anti-fascism/Art/Theory: An Introduction to What Hurts Us". Third Text. 33 (3). Routledge: 271–292\. doi:10.1080/09528822.2019.1663679. Retrieved 12 February 2025.
20. ^ a b Land, Nick (2 March 2012). The Dark Enlightment.
21. ^ Vinokour, Maya (1 July 2023). "Victor Pelevin and the Aesthetics of Neoreaction". The Russian Review. 82 (4): 631–648\. doi:10.1111/russ.12526. ISSN 1467-9434.
22. ^ Atkinson, Rowland; O’Farrell, Liam (1 November 2024). "Libertecture: A catalogue of libertarian spaces". Urban Studies. 61 (14): 2686–2702\. Bibcode:2024UrbSt..61.2686A. doi:10.1177/00420980231181323. ISSN 0042-0980.
23. ^ "Conservative blogger Curtis Yarvin joins 'Tucker Carlson Today'". Fox News. 9 September 2021. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
24. ^ a b c d e f Jamison, Peter; Dwoskin, Elizabeth (8 May 2025). "Curtis Yarvin helped inspire DOGE. Now he scorns it". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 8 May 2025. Retrieved 9 May 2025.
25. ^ Tait 2019, p. 199.
26. ^ a b c d e Ian, Ward (30 January 2025). "Curtis Yarvin's Ideas Were Fringe. Now They're Coursing Through Trump's Washington". Politico. Archived from the original on 28 March 2025.
27. ^ WIlson, Jason (21 December 2024). "He's anti-democracy and pro-Trump: the obscure 'dark enlightenment' blogger influencing the next US administration". The Guardian.
28. ^ Tait (2019), p. 200.
29. ^ a b c d e f g Pogue, James (20 April 2022). "Inside the New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on 2 April 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
30. ^ a b c d e Duran, Gil (July 2024). "Where J.D. Vance Gets His Weird, Terrifying Techno-Authoritarian Ideas". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on 27 April 2025. Retrieved 29 April 2025.
31. ^ Mahler, Jonathan; Mac, Ryan; Schleifer, Theodore (18 October 2024). "How Tech Billionaires Became the G.O.P.'s New Donor Class". The New York Times.
32. ^ "Curtis Yarvin wants American democracy toppled. He has some prominent Republican fans". 24 October 2022. Archived from the original on 15 July 2024. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
33. ^ Ward, Ian (24 October 2022). "The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped JD Vance's Unusual Worldview". Politico. Archived from the original on 18 July 2024. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
34. ^ Lehmann, Chris (27 October 2022). "The Reactionary Prophet of Silicon Valley". ISSN 0027-8378. Retrieved 3 April 2025.
35. ^ a b Valle, Gaby Del (22 November 2024). "Elon Musk's new DOGE plans are actually old ideas about mass deregulation". The Verge. Retrieved 3 April 2025.
36. ^ a b Derbyshire, Jonathan (26 March 2025). "The philosophy behind Trump's Dark Enlightenment". Financial Times. Retrieved 5 April 2025.
37. ^ Gold, Hadas (30 May 2025). "Curtis Yarvin wants to replace American democracy with a form of monarchy led by a 'CEO' | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved 5 June 2025.
38. ^ Sullivan, Andrew (30 April 2017). "Why the reactionary right must be taken seriously". New York Magazine. Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2017.
39. ^ a b Tait (2019), p. 195.
40. ^ Yarvin, Curtis. "A Formalist Manifesto". unqualified-reservations.org. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
41. ^ a b c Hodrick, Courtney (Spring 2022). "From Neoreaction to Alt-Right: A Schmittian Perspective" (PDF). Telos Press (198): 90–112\. doi:10.3817/0322198090.
42. ^ a b c d e f g Burrows, Roger (10 June 2020). "On Neoreaction". The Sociological Review. Archived from the original on 21 December 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
43. ^ "The American and Russian right are aligning". The Economist. 20 March 2025. Archived from the original on 23 March 2025. Retrieved 23 March 2025. "American thinkers affiliated with the so-called 'Dark Enlightenment' or 'neo-reactionary movement' are more straightforward in arguing against egalitarianism and democracy. Curtis Yarvin, one such thinker, has called for an American monarchy that would be run by a dictator-president, a figure sometimes referred to more politely as a 'national CEO'."
44. ^ a b c d e Waller, Julian G. (2022). "Intellectual Entrepreneurs Against Democracy: Theorizing Authoritarian Futures in America". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4117901. ISSN 1556-5068. Retrieved 27 April 2025.
45. ^ a b Beckett, Andy (11 May 2017). "Accelerationism: How a fringe philosophy predicted the future we live in". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022.
46. ^ Pinto, Ana Teixeira (May 2019). "Capitalism with a Transhuman Face: The Afterlife of Fascism and the Digital Frontier". Third Text. 33 (3). Taylor & Francis Online: 315–336\. doi:10.1080/09528822.2019.1625638. Retrieved 14 January 2025.
47. ^ Michael, George (27 July 2022). "An antidemocratic philosophy called 'neoreaction' is creeping into GOP politics". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 12 August 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
48. ^ Prokop, Andrew (24 October 2022). "Curtis Yarvin wants American democracy toppled. He has some prominent Republican fans". Vox. Retrieved 27 July 2024. "Shut down elite media and academic institutions: Now, recall that, according to Yarvin's theories, true power is held by the 'Cathedral', so they have to go, too. The new monarch/dictator should order them dissolved. 'You can't continue to have a Harvard or a New York Times past the start of April,' he told Anton. After that, he says, people should be allowed to form new associations and institutions if they want, but the existing Cathedral power bases must be torn down."
49. ^ Marchese, David (18 January 2025). "Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 March 2025.
50. ^ Battista, Christine M.; Sande, Melissa R. (2019). "The State of the Humanities and the Age of the Alt-Right". Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–12\. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_1. ISBN 978-3-030-18752-1. Retrieved 27 April 2025.
51. ^ a b c d e f Woods, Andrew (2019). "Cultural Marxism and the Cathedral: Two Alt-Right Perspectives on Critical Theory". Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 39–59\. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3. ISBN 978-3-030-18752-1. Retrieved 27 April 2025.
52. ^ Moldbug, Mencius (22 November 2007). "Why I Am Not a White Nationalist". Unqualified Reservations. Retrieved 20 July 2025.
53. ^ a b Townsend, Tess (31 March 2016). "Controversy Rages Over 'Pro-Slavery' Tech Speaker Curtis Yarvin". Inc.com. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 31 March 2016. "Yarvin's online writings, many under his pseudonym Mencius Moldbug, convey blatantly racist views. He expresses the belief that white people are genetically endowed with higher IQs than black people. He has suggested race may determine whether individuals are better suited for slavery, and his writing has been interpreted as supportive of the institution of slavery. ... Yarvin disputes that he agrees with the institution of slavery, but many interpret his writings as screeds supportive of bondage of black people. He writes in an email to Inc., 'I don't know if we can say *biologically* that part of the genius of the African-American people is the talent they showed in enduring slavery. But this is certainly true in a cultural and literary sense. In any case, it is easiest to admire a talent when one lacks it, as I do.' ... In Yarvin's Medium blog post, he wrote that while he disagrees with the concept that 'all races are equally smart,' he is not racist because he rejects what he refers to as 'IQism.'"
54. ^ Byars, Mitchell (6 April 2016). "Speaker Curtis Yarvin's racial views bring controversy to Boulder conference". Daily Camera: Boulder News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2018. Retrieved 30 June 2016. "A programming conference in Boulder this May has become surrounded by controversy after organizers decided to let Curtis Yarvin — a programmer who has blogged under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug about his views that white people are genetically smarter than black people — remain a speaker at the event. ... But Yarvin's views, which some have alleged are racist and endorse the institution of slavery, already have led to him being kicked out of a conference in 2015, and there has been pressure on LambdaConf to do the same. ... 'I am not an "outspoken advocate for slavery," a racist, a sexist or a fascist,' he wrote. 'I don't equate anatomical traits (whether sprinting speed or problem-solving efficiency) with moral superiority. ... '"
55. ^ Le, Vincent (2018). "THE DECLINE OF POLITICS IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE? CONSTELLATIONS AND COLLISIONS BETWEEN NICK LAND AND RAY BRASSIER". Cosmos & History. 14 (3): 31–50 – via EBSCO Information Services.
56. ^ Kaiser-Schatzlein, Robin (2022). "How the "soft" dictatorship of Lee Kuan Yew became a template for the American right". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on 14 January 2025. Retrieved 22 February 2025.
57. ^ Tait (2019), p. 196.
58. ^ Smith & Burrows (2021), p. 148
59. ^ a b Yarvin, Curtis (24 April 2007). "A formalist Manifesto". Unqualified Reservations. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2025.
60. ^ Yarvin, Curtis (2 July 2007). "The mystery of pacifism". Unqualified Reservations. Retrieved 24 March 2025.
61. ^ Yarvin, Curtis (12 June 2007). "A short history of ultracalvinism". Unqualified Reservations. Retrieved 24 March 2025.
62. ^ "The Far-Right Guru Who Has Befriended Silicon Valley's Extreme Factions". The Information. Retrieved 31 March 2025.
63. ^ a b c d "The Tech Baron Seeking to Purge San Francisco of "Blues"". The New Republic. 26 April 2024. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on 27 April 2024. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
64. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Tiffany, Kaitlyn (5 February 2024). "Meet Me in the Eternal City". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
65. ^ Cavaliere, Victoria. "Venture capitalist Balaji Srinivasan reportedly suggested doxxing a journalist who reported on narratives he didn't like". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
66. ^ a b c d e f g Corbett, Rachel (28 August 2024). "The For-Profit City That Might Come Crashing Down". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
67. ^ Robertson, Derek (8 March 2023). "The right makes a new claim to the future". Politico. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
68. ^ "The Most Powerful Crypto Bro in Washington Has Very Weird Beliefs". The New Republic. 1 October 2024. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on 26 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
69. ^ a b c d e f g h "The People of Solano County Versus the Next Tech-Billionaire Dystopia". The New Republic. 4 January 2024. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on 25 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
70. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "The VC Plan That Surely Won't Backfire: Tech Bro Colonies". The Daily Beast. 30 December 2023. Archived from the original on 11 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
71. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Ropek, Lucas (27 December 2024). "Worst New Trend of 2024: Techno-Colonialism and the Network State Movement". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on 9 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
72. ^ Bernstein, Joseph (12 December 2023). "Who Would Give This Guy Millions to Build His Own Utopia?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
73. ^ "Starbase City - Welcome to the "Network State"". Daily Kos. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
74. ^ Ropek, Lucas (10 January 2025). "Peter Thiel-Backed Startup That Wanted to Buy Greenland Is Thrilled That Trump Wants to Buy Greenland". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on 22 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
75. ^ a b c "The Hottest New Thing in Seasteading Is Land". Bloomberg News. 20 December 2019. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
76. ^ "Longevity enthusiasts want to create their own independent state. They're eyeing Rhode Island". MIT Technology Review. 31 May 2023. Archived from the original on 2 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
77. ^ Kusnetz, Nicholas (28 September 2024). "A Lawsuit From Backers of a 'Startup City' Could Bankrupt Honduras". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on 16 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
78. ^ a b Clarke, Laurie (18 April 2023). "A Peter Thiel-Backed Startup City Wants to Be Africa's Delaware". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on 18 April 2023. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
79. ^ Johnson, Marina (22 January 2024). "'The Guardian' calls it a 'community for rightwingers'. What to know about Highland Rim Project". Courier Journal. Archived from the original on 3 May 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
80. ^ Butler, Kiera (8 April 2025). "Christian "TheoBros" are building a tech utopia in Appalachia". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on 8 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
81. ^ Wilson, Jason (20 January 2024). "Revealed: far-right figures try to create Christian nationalist 'haven' in Kentucky". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 20 January 2024. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
82. ^ O’Brien, Luke. "The shocking far-right agenda behind the surveillance tech used by ICE and the FBI". Mother Jones (magazine). Archived from the original on 15 April 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
83. ^ Ahmed, Nafeez (7 February 2025). "Silicon Valley Whistleblowers Warn Elon Musk 'Hijacking' Republicans to Control Entire US Government". Byline Times. Archived from the original on 9 February 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
84. ^ Kirchick, James (16 May 2016). "Trump's Terrifying Online Brigades". Commentary Magazine. Archived from the original on 19 May 2016. Retrieved 25 October 2017.
85. ^ a b Mulhall, Joe (18 February 2020). "Andrew Sabisky's job at No 10 shows how mainstream the alt-right has become". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 15 June 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
86. ^ Jacobs, Keith; Malpas, Jeff (15 March 2019). Philosophy and the City: Interdisciplinary and Transcultural Perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-78660-461-3. Retrieved 17 April 2025.
87. ^ Land, Nick (11 October 2020). "Occult Xenosystems". Xenosystems.net. Archived from the original on 6 January 2018.
88. ^ Braune, Joan (22 December 2023). Understanding and Countering Fascist Movements: From Void to Hope. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003031604-4. ISBN 978-1-003-83113-6. Retrieved 19 September 2024.
89. ^ Lütticken, Sven (Autumn 2018). "Cultural Marxists Like Us". Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry. 46 (1). London: Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design: 67–75\. doi:10.1086/700248. hdl:1871.1/5d0f407a-3b77-4c45-85eb-cacbe50c240d. ISSN 2156-4914.

## Sources

[edit]

* Tait, Joshua (2019). "Mencius Moldbug and Neoreaction". In Sedgwick, Mark (ed.). Key Thinkers of the Radical Right: Behind the New Threat to Liberal Democracy. Oxford University Press. pp. 187–203\. ISBN 978-0190877606.
* Smith, Harrison; Burrows, Roger (2021). "Software, Sovereignty and the Post-Neoliberal Politics of Exit". Theory, Culture & Society. 38 (6): 143–166\. doi:10.1177/0263276421999439. hdl:1983/9261276b-8184-482c-b184-915655df6c19. ISSN 0263-2764. S2CID 234839947.

* v
* t
* e

Alt-right

Ideas|

| Core|

* American Nationalism
* Antifeminism
* Fourteen Words
* Ghost skin
* White ethnostate
* White nationalism
* White supremacy

|

Conspiracy
theories|

* Cultural Marxism
* Eurabia
* George Soros
* Great Replacement
* Homosexual agenda
* Kalergi Plan
* Murder of Seth Rich
* New World Order
* Pizzagate
* White genocide
* Zionist Occupation Government

Related|

* Alt-lite
* Alt-right pipeline
* Boogaloo movement
* Christian Identity
* DezNat
* Identitarian movement
* Incel
* Kinism
* Manosphere
* Men Going Their Own Way
* Neo-Confederates
* Neo-fascism
* Neo-nationalism
* Neo-Nazism
* Nouvelle Droite
* Paleoconservatism
* Paleolibertarianism
* QAnon
* Radical right
* Reactionary
* Dark Enlightenment
* Third Position
* Ultraconservatism

Online
culture|

| Alt-tech|

* 4chan
* /pol/
* 8chan
* BitChute
* Epik
* Gab
* Gettr
* Minds
* Parler
* Terrorgram
* Truth Social
* Voat (defunct)

|

Websites|

* American Renaissance
* Breitbart News
* The Daily Stormer
* Infowars
* Kingdom Identity Ministries
* Kuruc.info
* Metapedia
* Occidental Observer
* The Occidental Quarterly
* Rebel News
* Red Ice
* Reddit (r/The_Donald)
* The Right Stuff
* StoneToss
* Stormfront
* TruNews
* Vanguard News Network
* VDARE
* WorldNetDaily

Memes|

* "Basket of deplorables"
* "Beta male"
* "Cuckservative"
* Fashwave
* Happy Merchant
* "It's okay to be white"
* Moon Man
* NPC
* OK gesture
* "Owning the libs"
* Pepe the Frog
* "Red pill and blue pill"
* Right Wing Death Squad
* "Remove Kebab"
* "Shadilay"
* "Snowflake"
* "Social justice warrior"
* Trash Doves
* Triple parentheses
* Undercut

Groups|

* AltRight Corporation
* American Freedom Party
* Anti-Communist Action
* The Base
* Deplorable Pride
* Diagolon
* Groypers
* Hundred-Handers
* Identity Evropa (defunct)
* Les Identitaires
* National Policy Institute
* Patriot Front
* Patriot Prayer
* Proud Boys
* Rise Above Movement
* Traditionalist Worker Party (defunct)
* Vanguard America
* Washington Summit Publishers

Events|

| Incidents|

* Berkeley protests
* Comicsgate
* DeploraBall
* End Domestic Terrorism rally
* Gamergate
* Macron e-mail leaks
* Unite the Right rally
* Unite the Right 2

|

Attacks|

* Assault of DeAndre Harris
* Charlottesville car attack
* Christchurch mosque shootings
* Murder of Blaze Bernstein
* Murder of Timothy Caughman
* Pittsburgh synagogue shooting
* Portland train attack

Lists|

* Timeline of activities involving the Proud Boys

People|

* James Allsup
* Andrew Anglin
* Andrew "weev" Auernheimer
* Steve Bannon
* Theodore "Vox Day" Beale
* Carl "Sargon of Akkad" Benjamin
* Owen Benjamin
* Peter Brimelow
* Christopher Cantwell
* Mike Cernovich
* Alain de Benoist
* John Derbyshire
* Jack Donovan
* David Duke
* Mike Enoch
* Guillaume Faye
* Haakon Forwald
* Daniel Friberg
* Nick Fuentes
* Jean-François Gariépy
* Ben Garrison
* Austin "Augustus Sol Invictus" Gillespie
* Tim "Baked Alaska" Gionet
* Jim Goad
* Faith Goldy
* Paul Gottfried
* Matthew Heimbach
* Michael A. Hoffman II
* Sam Hyde
* Dillon Irizarry
* Charles C. Johnson
* Greg Johnson
* William Daniel Johnson
* Alex Jones
* Jason Jorjani
* Ruuben Kaalep
* Tom Kawcyznski
* Jason Kessler
* Douglas Murray
* Steve King
* Elliott Kline
* Nick Land
* Lana Lokteff
* Laura Loomer
* Norman Lowell
* Kevin MacDonald
* Jeremy MacKenzie
* Stephen McNallen
* Merlin Miller
* Stephen Miller
* Stefan Molyneux
* Paul Nehlen
* Paul "GypsyCrusader" Nicholas Miller
* Ethan Nordean
* Jack Posobiec
* Bronze Age Pervert
* Paul Ray Ramsey
* William Regnery II
* Colin "Millennial Woes" Robertson
* Thomas Rousseau
* Steve Sailer
* Martin Sellner
* Lauren Southern
* Richard B. Spencer
* Brett Stevens
* Jared Taylor
* Tila Tequila
* Daryush "Roosh V" Valizadeh
* Paul Joseph Watson
* Lucian Wintrich
* Curtis Yarvin
* Milo Yiannopoulos

Opposition
and
criticism|

| People|

* Antifa
* Steven "Destiny" Bonnell II
* Ian "Vaush" Kochinski
* Harry "Hbomberguy" Brewis
* Ian "Innuendo Studios" Danskin
* Robert Evans
* Emily Gorcenski
* Daryle Lamont Jenkins
* Angela Nagle
* David Neiwert
* Shaun
* Abigail "Philosophy Tube" Thorn
* Natalie "ContraPoints" Wynn
* Donna Zuckerberg

|

Media|

* Alt-America
* Angry Goy II
* Culture Warlords
* Devil's Bargain
* Feels Good Man
* I Don't Speak German
* It Came from Something Awful
* Kill All Normies
* Knowledge Fight
* White Right: Meeting the Enemy

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template