Distinction without a difference

Type of logical fallacy

Look up distinction without a difference in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists.[1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

For example, a person might say "I did not lie; I merely stretched the truth a little bit."[2]

## Form of the fallacy[edit]

* Claim X is made where the truth of the claim requires a distinct difference between A and B.
* There is no distinct difference between A and B.
* Therefore, claim X is incorrectly claimed to be true.

## Example[edit]

* Sergio: There is no way I would ever even consider taking dancing lessons.
* Kitty: How about I ask my friend from work to teach you?
* Sergio: If you know someone who is willing to teach me how to dance, then I am willing to learn, sure.[3]

## See also[edit]

* Connotation
* Connotation (semiotics)
* Distancing language
* Euphemism
* Spin (propaganda)

## References[edit]

1. ^ Martinich, A. P. (1996). Philosophical Writing: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. p. 99\. ISBN 9781405143929.
2. ^ Royal, Brandon (2013). The Little Blue Reasoning Book: 50 Powerful Principles for Clear and Effective Thinking. Maven Publishing. p. 178\. ISBN 978-1897393604.
3. ^ Bennett, Bo. "Distinction Without a Difference". logicallyfallacious.com.

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

|

* v
* t
* e

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template