Dome (geology)

Geological deformation structure

The Richat Structure in the Sahara Desert of Mauritania. Once considered to be an impact structure, it is now classified as a geologic dome uplifted by an underlying igneous intrusion. Structural dome on Baffin Island, seen in a planation surface. Oblique aerial photo of Upheaval Dome, Utah. Now considered to be a deeply-eroded impact crater, it was for many years believed to be a salt dome.  Caprock of a salt diapir at Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. The white rocks at left center are the gypsum and anhydrite carapace of the diapir.

A dome is a feature in structural geology where a circular part of the Earth's surface has been pushed upward, tilting the pre-existing layers of earth away from the center. In technical terms, it consists of symmetrical anticlines that intersect each other at their respective apices. Intact, domes are distinct, rounded, spherical-to-ellipsoidal-shaped protrusions on the Earth's surface. A slice parallel to Earth's surface of a dome features concentric rings of strata. If the top of a dome has been eroded flat, the resulting structure in plan view appears as a bullseye, with the youngest rock layers at the outside, and each ring growing progressively older moving inwards. These strata would have been horizontal at the time of deposition, then later deformed by the uplift associated with dome formation.[1][2]

## Formation mechanisms

[edit]

There are many possible mechanisms responsible for the formation of domes, the foremost of which are refolding, diapirism, igneous intrusion, and post-impact uplift.

### Refolding

[edit]

Structural domes can be formed by horizontal stresses in a process known as refolding, which involves the superposition, or overprinting, of two- or more fold fabrics. Upright folds formed by a horizontal primary stress in one direction can be altered by another horizontal stress oriented at 90 degrees to the original stress. This results in overprinting of the twofold fabrics, similar to wave interference patterns, that results in a system of basins and domes. Where the synclines of both fabrics are superimposed, a basin is formed; however, where the anticlines of both fabrics are superimposed, a dome is formed.[1][3]

### Diapirism

[edit]

Diapirism involves the vertical displacement of a parcel of material through overlying strata in order to reach equilibrium within a system that has an established density gradient (see Rayleigh–Taylor instability). To reach equilibrium, parcels from a stratum composed of less-dense material will rise towards Earth's surface, creating formations that are most often expressed in cross-section as "tear drop"-shaped, where the rounded end is that closest to the surface of the overlying strata. If overlying strata are weak enough to deform as the parcel rises, a dome can form; in cases where the overlying strata are particularly devoid of resistance to applied stress, the diapir may penetrate through the strata altogether and erupt on the surface. Potential materials comprised by these less-dense strata include salt (which is highly incompressible, thus creating the structural instability that leads to diapirism when buried under deposited strata and subject to overlying stress) and partially melted migmatite (a metamorphic-texture rock frequently found in domes due to the typical involvement of heat and/or pressure with their formation).[4][5]

### Igneous intrusion

[edit]

The intrusion of magma into layered sedimentary rocks and the resulting formation of laccoliths or igneous stocks can also create domes. In the case of laccoliths, this happens when the vertical movement magma stops at the base of particular sedimentary layer or layers and starts to spread laterally away from the pipe of ascending magma. As the magma flows laterally from the pipe of magma feeding it, a mushroom-shaped mass of magma is formed. This causes the overlying layers of sedimentary rock to bulge upward like a giant blister and deform into a dome.[6][7]

### Post-impact uplift

[edit]

A complex crater, caused by collision of a hypervelocity body with another larger than itself, is typified by the presence of a dome at the centre of the site of impact. These domes are typically large-scale (on the magnitude of tens of metres) and thought to be the result of post-impact weakening of the overlying strata and basement. Weakening is integral for the vertical uplift required to create a dome to take place, as it allows vertical displacement to happen unconstrained by the original rigidity properties of the undeformed rock.[8] This displacement is the result of the parcel of rock at the centre of the site of impact, composed of the strata and basement, re-equilibrating relative to gravity. Earlier theories attributed the dome-forming uplift to rebound; however, this would imply that the rock deforms elastically. Elastic deformation is not likely being that an impact is accompanied by extensive fracturing and partial melting of the rock that would change the mechanical properties of the rock.[9]

## Examples

[edit]

### Structural domes

[edit]

* Observed in the Karatau fault system, Kazakhstan[10]
* North Pole Dome, Western Australia (in the Pilbara Craton)[11]

### Diapiric domes

[edit]

* Gorleben salt dome, Lüchow-Dannenberg district in the far north-east of Lower Saxony, Germany.
* Leo Pargil Dome, Himachal Pradesh/Tibetan border[12]

### Igneous intrusion domes

[edit]

* Henry Mountains, Utah[6][7]
* Richat Structure, central Mauritania; possible impact structure[13]

### Impact structures

[edit]

* Upheaval Dome, Utah, USA[14]
* Vredefort Dome, South Africa[8]

## See also

[edit]

* Dome illusion

## References

[edit]

1. ^ a b Fossen, Haakon (2016). Structural geology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-47295-8.
2. ^ Monroe, James S. and Reed Wicander. The Changing Earth: Exploring Geology and Evolution. 2nd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997. ISBN 0-314-09577-2
3. ^ Grujic, Djordje; Walter, Thomas R; Gärtner, Hansjörg (August 2002). "Shape and structure of (analogue models of) refolded layers". Journal of Structural Geology. 24 (8): 1313–1326\. Bibcode:2002JSG....24.1313G. doi:10.1016/S0191-8141(01)00134-1.
4. ^ Lee, Jeffrey; Hacker, Bradley; Wang, Yu (December 2004). "Evolution of North Himalayan gneiss domes: structural and metamorphic studies in Mabja Dome, southern Tibet". Journal of Structural Geology. 26 (12): 2297–2316\. Bibcode:2004JSG....26.2297L. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.707.6750. doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2004.02.013.
5. ^ Teyssier, Christian; Whitney, Donna L. (1 December 2002). "Gneiss domes and orogeny". Geology. 30 (12): 1139–1142\. Bibcode:2002Geo....30.1139T. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1139:GDAO>2.0.CO;2.
6. ^ a b Jackson, M.D.; Pollard, D.D. (1998). "The laccolith-stock controversy: New results from the southern Henry Mountains, Utah". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 100 (1): 117–139\. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<0117:TLSCNR>2.3.CO;2.
7. ^ a b Horsman, E.; Morgan, S.; de Saint-Blanquat, M.; Habert, G.; Nugent, A.; Hunter, R.A.; Tikoff, B.G (2009). "Emplacement and assembly of shallow intrusions from multiple magma pulses, Henry Mountains, Utah". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 1–2 (1–2): 117–132\. Bibcode:2009EESTR.100..117H. doi:10.1017/S1755691009016089. S2CID 13607716.1–2&rft.pages=117-132&rft.date=2009&rft_id=https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13607716#id-name=S2CID&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1755691009016089&rft_id=info:bibcode/2009EESTR.100..117H&rft.aulast=Horsman&rft.aufirst=E.&rft.au=Morgan,+S.&rft.au=de+Saint-Blanquat,+M.&rft.au=Habert,+G.&rft.au=Nugent,+A.&rft.au=Hunter,+R.A.&rft.au=Tikoff,+B.G&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Dome+(geology)" class="Z3988">
8. ^ a b Lana, C.; Gibson, R. L.; Reimold, W. U. (July 2003). "Impact tectonics in the core of the Vredefort dome, South Africa: Implications for central uplift formation in very large impact structures". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 38 (7): 1093–1107\. Bibcode:2003M&PS...38.1093L. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x. S2CID 131154244.
9. ^ Kenkmann, Thomas; Jahn, Andreas; Scherler, Dirk; Ivanov, Boris A. (2005). "Structure and formation of a central uplift: A case study at the Upheaval Dome impact crater, Utah". Large meteorite impacts III. Boulder, Colo.: Geological Society of America. pp. 85–115\. ISBN 978-0-8137-2384-6. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
10. ^ Allen, M. B.; Alsop, G. I.; Zhemchuzhnikov, V. G. (January 2001). "Dome and basin refolding and transpressive inversion along the Karatau Fault System, southern Kazakstan". Journal of the Geological Society. 158 (1): 83–95\. Bibcode:2001JGSoc.158...83A. doi:10.1144/jgs.158.1.83. S2CID 140172908.
11. ^ Blewett, R.S; Shevchenko, S; Bell, B (August 2004). "The North Pole Dome: a non-diapiric dome in the Archaean Pilbara Craton, Western Australia". Precambrian Research. 133 (1–2): 105–120\. Bibcode:2004PreR..133..105B. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2004.04.002.1–2&rft.pages=105-120&rft.date=2004-08&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.04.002&rft_id=info:bibcode/2004PreR..133..105B&rft.aulast=Blewett&rft.aufirst=R.S&rft.au=Shevchenko,+S&rft.au=Bell,+B&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Dome+(geology)" class="Z3988">
12. ^ Jessup, M. J. "Stain Partitioning, Partial Melting and Exhumation off Domes along the Southern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Leo Pargil (India) And Lhagoi Kangri (Tibet) Domes". University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
13. ^ Jesus, Martinez Frias; et al. (September 2011). "Multianalytical characterization of silica-rich megabreccias from the proposed natural area of Richat (Sahara desert, Mauritania)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 2023-05-28.
14. ^ Buchner, Elmar; Kenkmann, Thomas (2008). "Upheaval Dome, Utah, USA: Impact origin confirmed". Geology. 36 (3): 227. Bibcode:2008Geo....36..227B. doi:10.1130/G24287A.1.

* v
* t
* e

Structural geology

Underlying theory|

* Deformation mechanism
* Lamé's stress ellipsoid
* Mohr–Coulomb theory
* Mohr's circle
* Overburden pressure
* Rock mechanics
* Strain
* Strain partitioning
* Stress
* Stress field
* Tension

Measurement conventions|

* Brunton compass
* Inclinometer
* Orthographic projection
* Rake
* Stereographic projection
* Strike and dip

Large-scale tectonics|

* Accretionary wedge
* Allochthon
* Autochthon
* Back-arc basin
* Continental collision
* Convergent boundary
* Décollement
* Divergent boundary
* Extensional tectonics
* Fault block
* Fenster
* Fold and thrust belt
* Fold mountains
* Foreland basin
* Graben
* Half-graben
* Horse
* Horst
* Horst and graben
* Intra-arc basin
* Inversion
* Klippe
* List of tectonic plate interactions
* Mélange
* Mountain formation
* Nappe
* Obduction
* Orogeny
* Passive margin
* Plate tectonics
* Pull-apart basin
* Rift valley
* Rift
* Saddle
* Strike-slip tectonics
* Structural basin
* Suture
* Syneclise
* Terrane
* Thick-skinned deformation
* Thin-skinned deformation
* Thrust tectonics

Fracturing|

* Columnar jointing
* Dike
* Exfoliation joint
* Fissure
* Joint
* Vein

Faulting|

* Asperity
* Cataclasite
* Cataclastic rock
* Detachment fault
* Disturbance
* Fault friction
* Fault mechanics
* Fault scarp
* Fault trace
* Thrust fault
* Transfer zone
* Transform fault

Foliation and lineation|

* Cleavage
* Compaction
* Crenulation
* Fissility
* Oblique foliation
* Pressure solution
* Rock microstructure
* Slickenside
* Stylolite
* Tectonic phase
* Tectonite

Folding|

* Anticline
* Chevron
* Detachment fold
* Dome
* Homocline
* Monocline
* Syncline
* Vergence

Boudinage|

* Competence

Kinematic analysis|

* 3D fold evolution
* Paleostress inversion
* Paleostress
* Section restoration

Shear zone|

* Mylonite
* Pure shear
* Shear

* Category

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Natural domes.
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template