Electronic health records in England

In 2005 the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom began deployment of electronic health record systems in NHS Trusts. The goal was to have all patients with a centralized electronic health record by 2010.[1] Lorenzo patient record systems were adopted in a number of NHS trusts. While many hospitals acquired electronic patient records systems in this process, there was no national healthcare information exchange.[2] Ultimately, the program was dismantled after a cost to the UK taxpayer was over $24 billion (£12 billion), and is considered one of the most expensive healthcare IT failures.[3]

In November 2013 NHS England launched a clinical digital maturity index to measure the digital maturity of NHS providers[4] but 40% of NHS managers surveyed by the Health Service Journal did not know their ranking, and the same proportion said improving their ranking was of low or very low priority.[5] in 2022 the 211 trusts progress was assessed. 43 trusts had an EPR meeting NHSE’s required standard, 138 had an EPR requiring “extension/optimisation” and 30 trusts did not have an EPR. Of those 30, 23 were procuring or developing plans to procure new EPRs and 7 were in the process of rolling out record systems. [6]

Electronic palliative care coordination systems have been developed by Marie Curie Cancer Care and the Royal College of General Practitioners which mean that terminally ill patients no longer have to explain their circumstances afresh to every new professional they meet and are less likely to be inappropriately taken to hospital.[7]

## Personalised Health and Care 2020

[edit]

The publication of Personalised Health and Care 2020 by the Department of Health elaborated a new attempt to integrate patient records.[8] Its stated ambition was that every citizen would be able securely to access their health records online by 2018 and make real time data available to paramedics, doctors and nurses.[9] A real time record across health and social care is seen as the key to the provision of integrated care.[10]

## Hospital systems

[edit]

Transferring hospital records to electronic systems has generally been much slower and more difficult than in primary care, apart from clinical imaging, which has been largely electronic for several years. In 2019 only 10% of NHS trusts claimed to be fully digitised. The NHS Long Term Plan requires all hospitals to move to digital records by 2023, so clinicians can access and interact with patient records and care plans wherever they are. As of 2019, 62% of trusts have plans to digitise all their patient records.[11]

## GP Systems

[edit]

GP2GP is an NHS Connecting for Health project in the United Kingdom. It enables GPs to transfer a patient's electronic medical record to another practice when the patient moves onto the list.[12] In General Practice in the UK the medical record has been computerized for many years; in fact, the UK is probably one of the world leaders in this field. There are very few General Practices in the UK which are not computerized. Unlike those in the USA, UK GPs have not had to deal with billing, and thus have been able to concentrate on clinical care. The GP record is separate from the national Care Record and contains far more data. Shaun O'Hanlon, EMIS's Chief Clinical Officer says that the legal framework around data sharing is the main problem in integrating patient data because the Data Protection Act 1998 puts responsibilities on GPs to protect the confidentiality of patient data, but at the same time they have a "duty to share" when it is in the best interests of the patient. He says the quickest, easiest route to large scale record sharing is to put patients in the driving seat using smartphone technology. He quotes a YouGov poll, which found that 85% of the population wanted any medical professional directly responsible for their treatment to have secure electronic access to key data from their GP record, such as long term conditions, medication history or allergies.[13]

Clinical IT suppliers are moving towards greater interoperability, already achieved with the GP2GP project, allowing different systems to exchange complete medical records between practices. There are projects allowing access between hospitals & GP practices. The main Primary Care systems are EMIS Health, SystmOne, iSOFT, and INPS Vision. The NHS in Scotland widely used GPASS until 2012. From April 2014 practices are contractually required to promote and offer patients the opportunity to book appointments online, order repeat prescriptions online and provide online patient record access.[14]

The assistant coroner for inner north London has twice written to Jeremy Hunt warning that “future deaths could occur [if] further action is not taken to facilitate secondary care access to GP records”.[15]

Leeds was the first city to implement the NHS Digital programme GP Connect. This makes patient records available across care settings, including social care, general practice, community, mental health and hospitals.[16]

## Patient access

[edit]

Further information: Patient record access

It has been possible for patients to access their own medical records online for some time. By 2013, the debates had moved onto discussing the impact of patient access on patient care.[17]

## Research

[edit]

### Prescription errors

[edit]

A study in the UK tested the Salford Medication Safety Dashboard (SMASH), a web application to help GPs and pharmacists find people in their electronic health records who might face safety hazards due to prescription errors. The dashboard was successfully used in identifying and helping patients with already registered unsafe prescriptions and later it helped monitoring new cases as they appeared.[18][19]

## See also

[edit]

* NHS Connecting for Health
* Patient record access in the United Kingdom

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "NHS Connecting for Health:Delivering the National Programme for IT". Archived from the original on 10 August 2006. Retrieved 4 August 2006.
2. ^
* Quinn I. "Electronic records are less efficient than paper, finds DH research lead". Pulse Today.
* Triggle, Nick (16 June 2010). "Health e-records 'struggling to fulfil potential'". British Broadcasting Corporation.
* Bewley S, Perry H, Fawdry R, Cumming G (October 2011). "NHS IT requires the wisdom of the crowd not the marketplace". BMJ. 343: d6484. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6484. PMID 21994300. S2CID 20468418.
* "Dismantling the NHS National Programme for IT". Department of Health Media Centre. 22 September 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2011. "The government today announced an acceleration of the dismantling of the National Programme for IT, following the conclusions of a new review by the Cabinet Office's Major Projects Authority (MPA) ... The MPA found that the National Programme for IT has not and cannot deliver to its original intent."(sic)
3. ^ Say M (26 September 2011). "Cabinet Office review pleads stay of execution for NHS IT". London: Guardian. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
4. ^ Evenstad, Lis (3 November 2015). "NHS trusts to self-assess their digital maturity". Computer Weekly. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
5. ^ Read, Claire (13 October 2015). "Survey: Funding pressures are holding up the paperless NHS". Health Service Journal. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
6. ^ "Revealed: The 35 trusts looking to replace their electronic patient records". Health Service Journal. 5 September 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
7. ^ Nightingale P (21 November 2014). "Coordinated systems help ensure people die where they choose". Health Service Jpurnal. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
8. ^ National Information Board; Department of Health (13 November 2014). "Personalised Health and Care 2020". Gov.UK. Government Digital Service.
9. ^ Heywood J (12 December 2014). "How developments in technology and data in the NHS are improving outcomes for patients". Blog Civil Service. Gov.uk. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
10. ^ Read C (21 November 2014). "Roundtable: A new charter for integrated care". Health Service Journal. London: EMAP Publishing. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
11. ^ "Majority of NHS trusts yet to fully embrace digital patient records". Building Better Healthcare. 29 May 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
12. ^ "GP2GP". NHS Connecting for Health. Archived from the original on 9 April 2010.
13. ^ O'Hanlon S (24 November 2014). "Data sharing: step out of the technological dark ages". Health Service Journal. Wilmington plc. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
14. ^ "Will your IT system support the requirements of the new contract?". Pulse. Cogora Limited. 14 April 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
15. ^ Thomas R (23 August 2017). "Health secretary warned again over hospital access to GP records". Health Service Journal. Wilmington plc. Retrieved 6 October 2017.
16. ^ "First city adopts new system for sharing GP patient records across services". Pulse. 15 October 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
17. ^ Davis Giardina T, Menon S, Parrish DE, Sittig DF, Singh H (2013). "Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review". Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 21 (4): 737–41\. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002239. PMC 4078277. PMID 24154835.
18. ^ "Interactive dashboard identifies patients at risk of unsafe prescribing in a flexible and sustainable way". NIHR Evidence (Plain English summary). National Institute for Health and Care Research. 22 June 2020. doi:10.3310/alert_40404.
19. ^ Jeffries, Mark; Gude, Wouter T.; Keers, Richard N.; Phipps, Denham L.; Williams, Richard; Kontopantelis, Evangelos; Brown, Benjamin; Avery, Anthony J.; Peek, Niels; Ashcroft, Darren M. (17 April 2020). "Understanding the utilisation of a novel interactive electronic medication safety dashboard in general practice: a mixed methods study". BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 20 (1): 69. doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1084-5. ISSN 1472-6947. PMC 7164282. PMID 32303219.

* v
* t
* e

Health informatics

Subdisciplines|

* Medical image computing and imaging informatics
* Artificial intelligence in healthcare
* Neuroinformatics in healthcare
* Behavior informatics in healthcare
* Computational biology in healthcare
* Translational bioinformatics
* Translational medicine
* health information technology
* Telemedicine
* Public health informatics
* Health information management
* Consumer health informatics

Medical classification|

* Continuity of Care Record
* HRHIS
* ICD
* ISO 27799
* LOINC

Professional organizations|

* American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics
* American Medical Informatics Association
* Australian Society / Australasian College (to merge from 2020)
* Brazilian Society
* European Federation
* Indian Association
* International Association
* American College of Medical Informatics

Other concepts|

* Electronic health record
* Health Level 7
* Remote manipulator
* Personalized medicine / precision medicine
* List of medical and health informatics journals
* openEHR

* v
* t
* e

Telemedicine and telehealth

Background concepts|

* Health informatics
* In absentia health care
* Telecommunication

Medical record|

* Admission note
* Blue Button
* De-identification
* Electronic health record
* Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
* Personal health record

Patient participation|

* Decision aids
* Doctor–patient relationship
* E-patient
* Health 2.0
* Health education
* Knowledge translation
* mHealth
* Participative decision-making in organizations
* Patient Activation Measure
* Shared decision-making

Health information on the Internet|

* Health information on Wikipedia
* Online patient education
* PubMed
* PubMed Central

Telemedicine subspecialties|

* eHealth
* Remote surgery
* Remote therapy
* Remote patient monitoring
* Tele-audiology
* Tele-epidemiology
* Teledentistry
* Teledermatology
* Telemental health
* Telenursing
* Teleophthalmology
* Telepathology
* Telepharmacy
* Telepsychiatry
* Teleradiology
* Telerehabilitation

Roles to play|

* Open-source healthcare software
* Patient opinion leader
* Research participant
* Virtual patient

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template