Facet (psychology)

Specific and unique aspect of a broader personality trait

In psychology, a facet is a specific and unique aspect of a broader personality trait.[1] Both the concept and the term "facet" were introduced by Paul Costa and Robert McCrae in the first edition of the NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) Manual.[1][2] Facets were originally elaborated only for the neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion traits; Costa and McCrae introduced facet scales for the agreeableness and conscientiousness traits in the Revised NEO-PI (NEO PI-R).[3] Each of the Big Five personality traits in the five factor model contains six facets, each of which is measured with a separate scale.[4] The use of facets and facet scales has since expanded beyond the NEO PI-R, with alternative facet and domain structures derived from other models of personality. Examples include the HEXACO model of personality structure,[5][6] psycholexical studies,[7] circumplex models (e.g., Goldberg's Abridged Big-Five Dimensional Circumplex),[8] the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ),[9] and the California Psychological Inventory.[10]

## Five factor model

[edit]

### NEO PI-R

[edit]

Costa and McCrae originally developed facet scales for neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience to reflect the fact that each broader trait is composed of different aspects of personality.[1] They admit their decisions were somewhat arbitrary and acknowledge that each trait may actually have more or less than six facets. However, they justify their choices with the need for a balance between comprehension and comprehensiveness and research supporting their six facet breakdown of each Big Five personality trait.[1][4] The following table displays the labels used by Costa and McCrae for each personality domain and its constituent facets.[3]

* Neuroticism: Anxiety, hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, vulnerability
* Extroversion: Warmth, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity, excitement-seeking, positive emotions
* Openness to experience: fantasy, aesthetics, feelings, actions, ideas, values
* Agreeableness: Trust, straightforwardness, altruism, compliance, modesty, tender-mindedness
* Conscientiousness: Competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, deliberation

### Lexical facets

[edit]

In contrast with Costa and McCrae's admittedly arbitrary decisions, studies guided by the Lexical hypothesis root facets in the personality language of laypeople. This approach is meant to test, and possibly enhance, the content validity of the measures used.[7] Using the five factor model, Gerard Saucier and Fritz Ostendorf explored each domain's facet structure through lexical studies. Using English and German participants and materials, they found a total of 18 facets, or "subcomponents", of the Big Five.[7][11] These are:

* Neuroticism: Irritability, insecurity, emotionality
* Extroversion: Sociability, unrestraint, assertiveness, activity-adventurousness
* Openness to Experience: Intellect, imagination-creativity, perceptiveness
* Agreeableness: Warmth-affection, gentleness, generosity, modesty-humility
* Conscientiousness: Orderliness, decisiveness-consistency, reliability, industriousness

### Abridged Big-Five Dimensional Circumplex

[edit]

The standard five factor model conceives of personality as a collection of unidimensional, polar scales. In contrast, circumplex models explore personality as it is constructed in the two-dimensional space created by the intersections of these polar scales.[8] Timothy Leary was the first to apply the circumplex to the study of personality.[12] Following Leary's pioneering work in the 1950s, Jerry Wiggins' Interpersonal Circle was one of the most influential early circumplex models of personality.[8][13] Despite similarities between the Interpersonal Circle and two of the Big Five,[8] it was only later that the work of Lewis Goldberg with Dean Peabody,[14] and Willem Hofstee and Boele de Raad[8] integrated the circumplex and Five Factor models. The result was The Abridged Big-Five Dimensional Circumplex (AB5C). In place of specific facet labels, Goldberg and his colleagues use Roman numerals, and plus and minus signs corresponding to the two intersecting factors. For example, the facet corresponding to the intersection of extraversion and disagreeableness is represented by "I+II−".

The following tables list adjectives associated with the intersections of high scores (+) and low scores (−) on the Five Factors. Corresponding NEO PI-R labels are provided in parentheses, with adjectives approximating pure Big Five traits (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism) in bold. Empty cells represent impossible combinations (e.g., I+I−) or "blank spaces" (e.g., II+III−) – that is, combinations that are either unimportant or do not naturally appear in language.[8][15]

Intersections of two positives (++)

| Extraversion (I+) | Agreeableness (II+) | Conscientiousness (III+) | Emotional Stability (IV+) | Openness to Experience (V+)
Extraversion (I+)  | Talkative, Extraverted, Aggressive | Sociable, Enthusiastic, Communicative | Active, Competitive, Persistent | Confident, Bold, Assured | Expressive, Adventurous, Dramatic
Agreeableness (II+)  | Sympathetic, Kind, Warm | Merry, Cheerful, Happy | Helpful, Cooperative, Considerate | Trustful, Pleasant, Tolerant | Genial, Tactful
Conscientiousness (III+)  | Alert, Ambitious, Firm | Responsible, Dependable, Reliable | Organized, Neat, Orderly | Thorough, Steady, Consistent | Industrious, Perfectionistic, Sophisticated
Emotional Stability (IV+)  | Unselfconscious, Weariless, Indefatigable | Patient, Relaxed, Undemanding | Determined, Unswerving | Unenvious | Adaptable, Multitalented
Openness to Experience (V+)  | Theatrical, Worldly, Eloquent | Deep, Diplomatic, Idealistic | Analytical, Perceptive, Informative | Intellectual, Inventive, Intelligent | Creative, Philosophical, Imaginative
Note: Adjectives provided above load more closely on their row's Factor. For example, "Sociable" is nearer to Extraversion than Agreeableness, while "Sympathetic" is nearer to Agreeableness than Extraversion.
Intersections of positive and negative, with weight on positive (+-)

| Introversion (I−) | Disagreeableness (II−) | Low Conscientiousness (III−) | Neuroticism (IV−) | Closed to Experience (V−)
Extraversion (I+)  |  | Dominant, Domineering, Forceful | Boisterous, Mischievous, Exhibitionistic | Flirtatious, Explosive, Wordy | Verbose
Agreeableness (II+)  | Soft-hearted, Agreeable, Obliging |  | Lenient, Compassionate, Sheeple | Sentimental, Affectionate, Sensitive | Conforming
Conscientiousness (III+)  | Careful, Cautious, Punctual | Demanding, Strict, Deliberate |  | Exacting, Arduous | Conventional, Traditional
Emotional Stability (IV+)  | Unexcitable, Unassuming | Unemotional, Masculine | Informal, Casual |  | Imperturbable, Unconcerned
Openness to Experience (V+)  | Introspective, Meditative, Contemplating | Individualistic, Eccentric | Improvisational, Versatile | Sensual |
Note: Adjectives provided above load more closely on their row's Factor. For example, "Dominant" is nearer to Extraversion than Disagreeableness.
Intersections of positive and negative, with weight on negative (-+)

| Extraversion (I+) | Agreeableness (II+) | Conscientiousness (III+) | Emotional Stability (IV+) | Openness to Experience (V+)
Introversion (I−)  |  | Timid, Unaggressive, Submissive | Reserved, Restrained, Serious | Tranquil, Sedate, Placid | Inner-Directed
Disagreeableness (II−)  | Rough, Abrupt, Crude |  | Rigid, Hard | Insensitive, Unaffectionate, Passionless | Shrewd, Sharp-Witted
Low Conscientiousness (III−)  | Reckless, Unruly, Devil-May-Care | Permissive, Enabling |  | Complacent, Unbothered | Unconventional, Slapdash
Neuroticism (IV−)  | High-Strung | Emotional, Gullible | Particular, Intrusive |  | Paranoid, Histrionic, Weird
Closed to Experience (V−)  | Unscrupulous, Pompous | Simple, Dependent, Servile | Muleheaded, Obstinate, Infuriating | Unreflective, Unsophisticated, Imperceptive |
Note: Adjectives provided above load more closely on their row's Factor. For example, "Rough" is nearer to Disagreeableness than Extraversion.
Intersection of negatives (--)

| Introversion (I−) | Disagreeableness (II−) | Low Conscientiousness (III−) | Neuroticism (IV−) | Closed to Experience (V−)
Introversion (I−)  | Shy, Quiet, Introverted | Unsociable, Uncommunicative, Seclusive | Unenergetic, Uncompetitive, Sluggish | Lonely, Weak, Cowardly | Passive, Meek, Dull
Disagreeableness (II−)  | Cold, Unfriendly, Impersonal | Unsympathetic, Unkind, Harsh | Inconsiderate, Rude, Impolite | Entitled, Selfish, Ill-Tempered | Uncharitable, Ruthless, Coarse
Low Conscientiousness (III−)  | Inefficient, Lazy, Indecisive | Unreliable, Negligent, Undependable | Disorganized, Disorderly, Careless | Inconsistent, Scatterbrained, Unstable | Haphazard, Illogical, Immature
Neuroticism (IV−)  | Self-Pitying, Insecure, Fretful | Irritable, Temperamental, Defensive | Hypocritical, Compulsive, Nosey | Moody, Jealous, Possessive | Contemptous,
Closed to Experience (V−)  | Unimaginative, Uninquisitive, Inarticulate | Shallow, Terse | Shortsighted, Unobservant, Ignorant | Controlling | Uncreative, Unintellectual, Unintelligent
Note: Adjectives provided above load more closely on their row's Factor. For example, "Inefficient" is nearer to Low Conscientiousness than Intoversion, while "Unenergetic" is nearer to Introversion than Low Conscientiousness.

## Other models

[edit]

### Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire

[edit]

Main article: Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire

The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) was developed by Auke Tellegen at the University of Minnesota in the early 1980s.[16] It has been used since its development in the Minnesota Twin Family Study.[9] Three of the four broad traits measured by the MPQ contain between three and four facets, or "primary traits".[17] The fourth, "absorption", is classified as both a broad trait and a primary trait.[9] In addition to these personality measures, the MPQ contains three scales assessing the validity of responses. The "Unlikely Virtues" scale is designed to assess impression management, the "True Response Inconsistency" scale assesses the tendency to answer all questions true (or false), and the "Variable Response Inconsistency" scale assesses inconsistent responses to similar or opposite questions.[18] The following table displays Tellegen's labels for broad traits, primary traits (facets), and the subscales of absorption.[9]

* Positive emotional temperament: Well-being, social potency, achievement, social closeness
* Negative emotional temperament: Stress reaction, alienation, aggression
* Constraint: Control, harm-avoidance, traditionalism
* Absorption (subscales): Sentient, prone to imaginative and altered states

### HEXACO model

[edit]

The HEXACO model is a six-factor model of personality. This model was developed in the early 2000s by Michael C. Ashton and Kibeom Lee using lexical studies.[19] The HEXACO model adds a sixth factor, honesty-humility, to five factors similar to those in the Big Five: emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Despite these similarities, the facet structures of traits in the HEXACO model differ from those in the five factor model.[20] In addition to these trait-specific facets, Ashton and Lee have proposed two "interstitial" facets located in the space between traits. The first, altruism (versus antagonism), is shared by honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality. The second, negative self-evaluation, is shared by extraversion and emotionality.[21] The following table displays the trait and facet labels used by Ashton and Lee.[22]

* Honesty-humility: Sincerity, fairness, greed avoidance, modesty
* Emotionality: Fearfulness, anxiety, dependence, sentimentality
* Extraversion: Social self-esteem, social boldness, sociability, liveliness
* Agreeableness: Forgivingness, gentleness, flexibility, patience
* Conscientiousness: Organization, diligence, perfectionism, prudence
* Openness to experience: Aesthetic appreciation, inquisitiveness, creativity, unconventionality
* Interstitial: Altruism

## References

[edit]

1. ^ a b c d McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective, Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 9781572308275.
2. ^ Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
3. ^ a b Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4. ^ a b Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (February 1995). "Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory" (PDF). Journal of Personality Assessment. 64 (1): 21–50\. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.498.960. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2. PMID 16367732.
5. ^ Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. (May 2007). "Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 11 (2): 150–166\. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907. PMID 18453460. S2CID 13183244.
6. ^ Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2006). "Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form". Psychological Assessment. 18 (2): 182–191\. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182. PMID 16768594.
7. ^ a b c Saucier, G. & Ostendorf, F. (April 1999). "Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76 (4): 613–627\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613. PMID 10234848.
8. ^ a b c d e f Hofstee, W. K. B.; De Raad, B. & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). "Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63 (1): 146–163\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146. PMID 1494982. S2CID 2622872.
9. ^ a b c d Tellegen, A. "MPQ Standard". University of Minnesota Press. Archived from the original on 12 May 2023. Retrieved 2 April 2012.
10. ^ Soto, C. J. & John, O. P. (2009). "Using the California Psychological Inventory to assess the Big Five personality domains: A hierarchical approach" (PDF). Journal of Research in Personality. 43: 25–38\. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.005.
11. ^ John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L, A. (2008). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Third Edition. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 9781609180591.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
12. ^ Timothy Leary (1 July 2004). Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: A Functional Theory and Methodology for Personality Evaluation. Wipf & Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-59244-776-3.
13. ^ Wiggins, J. S. (March 1979). "A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37 (3): 395–412\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395.
14. ^ Peabody, D. & Goldberg, L. R. (September 1989). "Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57 (3): 552–567\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.552. PMID 2778639.
15. ^ Johnson, J. A. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). "Clarification of the Five-Factor Model with the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (3): 563–576\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.563.
16. ^ Tellegen, A. (1982). A brief manual for the Dimensional Personality Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
17. ^ Boyle, G. J.; Matthews, G.; & Saklofsky, D. H. (2008). "Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire". The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment, volume 2: Personality theory and assessment. London: Sage. pp. 261–292\. ISBN 978-1412946520.
18. ^ Tellegen, A. (September 1988). "The analysis of consistency in personality assessment". Journal of Personality. 56 (3): 621–663\. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00905.x.
19. ^ Ashton, M. C.; Lee, K.; Perugini, M.; Szarota, P.; de Vries, R. E.; Blas, L. D.; Boies, K.; De Raad, B. (February 2004). "A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (2): 356–366\. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356. PMID 14769090.
20. ^ Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2004). "Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory". Multivariate Behavioral Research. 39 (2): 329–358\. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8. PMID 26804579. S2CID 27763606.
21. ^ Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (June 2006). "Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form". Psychological Assessment. 18 (2): 182–191\. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182. PMID 16768594.
22. ^ Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. "Scale Descriptions". Retrieved 27 December 2022.

* v
* t
* e

Big Five personality traits

Traits|

* Openness to experience
* Conscientiousness
* Extraversion
* Agreeableness
* Neuroticism

Related|

* Facet (psychology)
* Hierarchical structure
* International Personality Item Pool
* Personality theories
* Revised NEO Personality Inventory
* Trait theory

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template