Gothic War (376–382)

Conflict between the Roman Empire and various Gothic tribes

For the war in Italy, see Gothic War (535–554). For an overview of the Gothic Wars, see Gothic Wars.

Gothic War (376–382)

Part of the Gothic Wars
and Roman–Germanic Wars

A relief on the Obelisk of Theodosius (389): on the upper tier, Honorius, Arcadius, Theodosius I, and Valentinian II, enthroned and flanked by court officials; on the low tier, Persians (left) and Goths (right) presenting gifts in supplication[1][2][3]
| Date| 376–382

|

Location|

Balkans

Result|  Gothic victory
Belligerents
Eastern Roman Empire
Western Roman Empire|  Therving Goths
Greuthungi Goths
Alanic raiders
Hunnic raiders
Commanders and leaders

* Emperor Valens †
* Emperor Theodosius
* Emperor Gratian
* Lupicinus
* Traianus †
* Sebastianus †
* Ricomer
* Bauto

|  Fritigern
Alatheus
Saphrax

* v
* t
* e

Gothic War (376–382)

* Marcianople
* Willows
* Dibaltum
* 1st Adrianople
* 2nd Adrianople
* Constantinople
* Thessalonica

* v
* t
* e

Fall of the Western Roman Empire

* Gothic War (376–382)
* Marcianople
* Willows
* Dibaltum
* 1st Adrianople
* 2nd Adrianople
* Constantinople
* Thessalonica
* Save
* Frigidus
* Revolt of Alaric I
* Gildonic War
* Pictish War
* Revolt of Tribigild
* Gothic War (401–403)
* Asti
* Pollentia
* Verona
* War of Radagaisus
* Florence
* Faesulae
* Crossing of the Rhine
* Ostia
* Rome (410)
* War of Heraclianus
* Massilia
* Gothic War in Spain (416–418)
* Nervasos Mountains
* Roman–Sasanian War of 421–422
* Tarraco
* Roman civil war of 425
* Gothic revolt of Theodoric I
* Arles (425)
* Roman civil war of 427–429
* Mérida
* Frankish War (428)
* Africa
* Hippo Regius
* Carthage
* Roman civil war of 432
* Rimini
* Burgundian Revolt of Gunther
* Arles (435)
* Gothic War (436–439)
* Narbonne
* Battle of Mons Colubrarius
* Toulouse (439)
* Vandal War (439–442)
* Byzantine–Sasanian War of 440
* Vicus Helena
* Utus
* Asemus
* Catalaunian Plains
* Aquileia
* Padua
* Milan
* Rome (455)
* Aylesford
* Gothic War in Spain (456)
* Agrigentum
* Corsica
* Roman civil war of 456
* Garigliano
* Camp Cannini
* Gothic War (457–458)
* Toulouse (458)
* Arles (458)
* Cartagena
* Orleans
* Bergamo
* Cape Bon
* Déols
* Arles (471)
* Rome (472)
* Ravenna (475)
* Pavia
* Ravenna (476)
* Soissons
* Badon

The Gothic War of 376–382 was one of several Gothic Wars in Roman history in which the Goths fought against the Roman Empire. This particular conflict included the catastrophic Roman defeat at the Battle of Adrianople, which is commonly seen as a cause of the decline of the Western Roman Empire, although its significance is widely debated.[4][5]

## Background

[edit]

In the summer of 376, a massive number of Goths arrived on the Danube River, the border of the Roman Empire, requesting asylum from the Huns.[6] There were two groups: the Thervings led by Fritigern and Alavivus and the Greuthungi led by Alatheus and Saphrax.[7] Eunapius states their number as 200,000 including civilians, but Peter Heather estimates that the Thervings may have had only 10,000 warriors and 50,000 people in total, with the Greuthungi about the same size.[8] The Cambridge Ancient History places modern estimates at around 90,000 people.[9] Noel Lenski accepts Eunapius' number as approximating the total population of migrants who joined forces against the Romans in the first year (including Thervings and Greuthungi, but also some Taifali, Alans and Huns), which population could have fielded a fighting force of 40,000-50,000 warriors.[10]

The Goths sent ambassadors to Valens, the Eastern Roman emperor, requesting permission to settle their people inside the Empire.[11] It took them some time to arrive, for the Emperor was in Antioch preparing for a campaign against the Sasanian Empire over control of Armenia and Iberia. The bulk of his forces were stationed in the East, far away from the Danube.[12][13] Ancient sources are unanimous that Valens was pleased at the appearance of the Goths, as it offered the opportunity of new soldiers at low cost.[14][15] With Valens committed to action on the Eastern frontier, the appearance of a large number of barbarians meant his skeleton force in the Balkans were outnumbered.[16] Valens must have appreciated the danger when he gave the Thervings permission to enter the empire and the terms he gave them were highly favorable. This was not the first time barbarian tribes had been settled; the usual course was that some would be recruited into the army and the rest would be broken up into small groups and resettled across the empire at the Emperor's discretion. This would keep them from posing a unified threat and assimilate them into the greater Roman population. The agreement differed with the Thervings by allowing them to choose the place of their settlement, Thrace, and allowed them to remain united. The group of Thervings under the leaders named Alavivus and Fritigern were favored for crossing since their group had already allied with Valens and converted to Christianity in the wake of a civil war among the Thervings after 370.[17] The Therving leader Athanaric, who had confronted Valens in his Gothic War of 367-369 was denied entry, as were the Greuthungi, against whom the Roman army and naval forces blocked the river to deny their crossing.[18]

The Thervings were probably allowed to cross at or near the fortress of Durostorum.[19] They were ferried by the Romans in boats, rafts and in hollowed tree-trunks; Ammianus Marcellinus remarks bitterly that "diligent care was taken that no future destroyer of the Roman state should be left behind, even if he were smitten by a fatal disease". Even so, the river swelled with rain and many drowned.[20] The Goths were to have their weapons confiscated but, whether because the Romans in charge accepted bribes, the Romans did not have the manpower to check all of the incoming warriors, or warriors recruited into the Roman army would need their own arms, many Goths were allowed to retain their weapons.[21][22][a] The Romans placed the Thervings along the southern bank of the Danube in Lower Mœsia as they waited for the land allocations to begin.[24] In the interim, the Roman state was to provide them food.[25]

## Breakout

[edit]

Movements of the Goths in 376

So many people in such a small area caused a food shortage and the Thervings began to starve.[26] Roman logistics could not cope with the vast numbers, and officials under the command of Lupicinus simply sold off much of the food before it reached the hands of the Goths. Desperate, Gothic families sold many of their children into slavery to Romans for dog meat at the price of one child per one dog.[27][28]

This treatment caused the Therving Goths to grow rebellious and Lupicinus decided to move them south to Marcianople, his regional headquarters.[29] To guard the march south, Lupicinus was forced to pull out the Roman troops guarding the Danube, which allowed the Greuthungi promptly to cross into Roman territory. The Thervings then deliberately slowed their march to allow the Greuthungi to catch up.[30] As the Thervings approached Marcianople, Lupicinus invited Fritigern, Alavivus and a small group of their attendants to dine with him inside the city. The bulk of the Goths were encamped some distance outside, with Roman troops between them and the city. Due to the persistent refusal of the Roman soldiers to allow the Goths to buy supplies in the town's market, fighting broke out and several Roman soldiers were killed and robbed. Lupicinus, having received the news as he sat at the banquet with the Gothic leaders, ordered Fritigern and Alavivus held hostage and their retainers executed. When news of the killings came to the Goths outside, they prepared to assault Marcianople. Fritigern advised Lupicinus that the best way to calm the situation was to allow him to rejoin his people and show them that he was still alive. Lupicinus agreed and set him free. Alavivus is not mentioned again in the sources and his fate is unknown.[31][32]

Having survived the chaos of the night and the earlier humiliations, Fritigern and the Thervings decided it was time to break the treaty and rebel against the Romans, and the Greuthungi immediately joined them. Fritigern led the Goths away from Marcianople towards Scythia. Lupicinus and his army pursued them 14 km (8.7 mi) from the city, fought the Battle of Marcianople and were annihilated. All the junior officers were killed, the military standards were lost and the Goths secured new weapons and armor from the dead Roman soldiers. Lupicinus survived and escaped back to Marcianople. The Thervings then raided and pillaged throughout the region.[33][34]

At Adrianople a small Gothic force employed by the Romans was garrisoned under the command of Sueridus and Colias, who were themselves Goths. When they received news of the events they decided to remain in place "considering their own welfare the most important thing of all."[35] The Emperor, afraid of having a Roman garrison under Gothic control so close to a Gothic rebellion, ordered Sueridus and Colias to march east to Hellespontus. The two commanders asked for food and money for the journey, as well as a postponement of two days to prepare. The local Roman magistrate, angry at this garrison for having earlier pillaged his suburban villa, armed people from the city and stirred them against the garrison. The mob demanded that the Goths follow orders and leave immediately. The men under Sueridus and Colias initially stood still but when they were pelted with curses and missiles from the mob, attacked and killed many. The Gothic garrison left the city and joined Fritigern, and the Goths besieged Adrianople. But lacking the equipment and the experience to conduct a siege and losing many men to missiles, they abandoned the city. Fritigern declared he now "kept peace with walls". The Goths once again dispersed to loot the rich and undefended countryside. Using prisoners and Roman traitors, the Goths were led to hidden hoards, rich villages and such places.[36]

> For without distinction of age or sex all places were ablaze with slaughter and great fires, sucklings were torn from the very breasts of their mothers and slain, matrons and widows whose husbands had been killed before their eyes were carried off, boys of tender or adult age were dragged away over the dead bodies of their parents. Finally many aged men, crying that they had lived long enough after losing their possessions and their beautiful women, were led into exile with their arms pinioned behind their backs and weeping over the glowing ashes of their ancestral homes.[37]

## 377: Containing the Goths

[edit]

Campaign of 377

Many Goths inside Roman territory joined Fritigern, as did assorted slaves, miners and prisoners.[38] Roman garrisons in fortified towns held out but those outside of them were easy prey. The Goths created a vast wagon train to hold all the loot and supplies pillaged from the Roman countryside and they had much rage against the Roman population for what they had endured. Those who had started as starving refugees had transformed into a powerful army.[39][40]

Valens, now recognizing the seriousness of the situation from his base in Antioch, sent general Victor to negotiate a peace with the Sassanids.[41] He also began to transfer the Eastern Roman army to Thrace. While the main army mobilized, he sent ahead an advance force under Traianus and Profuturus. Valens also reached out to the Western Roman emperor Gratian, his co-emperor and nephew, for aid. Gratian responded by sending the comes domesticorum Ricomer and the comes rei militaris Frigeridus to guard the western passes through the Haemus mountains with their soldiers. The aim was to contain the Goths from spreading westward and for the two forces to join up eventually with the East Roman army. These huge movements of troops and the cooperation of the West spoke to the grave threat the Goths posed.[42][43]

Traianus and Profuturus arrived leading troops of Armenians, but Frigeridus, leading the Pannonian and the transalpine auxiliaries, fell ill from gout. Ricomer, having led a force cut from Gratian's palatine army, took command of the combined forces by the mutual consent of the other leaders, probably at Marcianople.[44][45][46] The Goths withdrew north of the Haemus mountains, and the Romans moved to engage.[47] At a place called Ad Salices[b] ("The Willows"), they fought the Battle of the Willows. The Romans were outnumbered, and during the battle, their left wing began to collapse. Only with hasty reinforcements and Roman discipline was the situation retrieved. The battle lasted until dusk, when the opposing armies ceased combat and left the field. The Goths withdrew into their wall of wagons, leaving the battle a bloody draw. Both sides counted heavy losses, including Profuturus, who was slain on the battlefield.[49][50]

After the battle, the Romans retreated to Marcianople, and the Goths of Fritigern spent seven days within their wagon fort before moving out. Frigeridus destroyed and enslaved a band of marauding Goths under Farnobius and sent the survivors to Italy. That autumn, Ricomer returned to Gaul to collect more troops for the next year's campaign. Valens meanwhile sent soldiers under magister equitum Saturninus to Thrace to join up with Traianus. Saturninus and Traianus erected a line of forts in the Haemus passes to block the Goths. The Romans hoped to weaken the enemy with the rigors of winter and starvation and then lure Fritigern into open battle on the plains between the Haemus mountains and the Danube to finish him off. The Goths, once again hungry and desperate, tried to break through the passes but were repulsed each time. Fritigern then enlisted the aid of mercenary Huns and Alans, who boosted his strength. Saturninus, realizing he could no longer hold the passes against them, abandoned the blockade and retreated. The Goths were thus free to raid anew, reaching as far as the Rhodope Mountains and the Hellespont.[51][52][53]

> Then there were to be seen and to lament acts most frightful to see and to describe: women driven along by cracking whips and stupefied with fear, still heavy with their unborn children, which before coming into the world endured many horrors; little children too clinging to their mothers. Then could be heard the laments of high-born boys and maidens, whose hands were fettered in cruel captivity. Behind these were led last of all grown-up girls and chaste wives, weeping and with downcast faces, longing even by a death of torment to forestall the imminent violation of their modesty. Among these was a freeborn man, not long ago rich and independent, dragged along like some wild beast and railing at thee, Fortune, as merciless and blind, since thou hadst in a brief moment deprived him of his possessions and of the sweet society of his dear ones; had driven him from his home, which he saw fallen to ashes and ruins and sacrificed him to a bloody victor, either to be torn from limb to limb or amid blows and tortures to serve as a slave.[54]

The Goths, joined by their new allies the Huns and Alans, travelled south in search of plunder and close to the city of Deultum won the Battle of Deultum destroying most of the Eastern Roman army and the city. Barzimeres, tribunum scutariorum (Commander of the Guards), was killed and Equitius, cura palatii (Marshal of the Court), was captured.[55] The Goths marched on Augusta Trajana to attack the general Frigiderus but his scouts detected the invaders and he promptly withdrew to Illyria[56] but the city was also destroyed. Equitius later managed to escape from captivity.

Archaeological finds in this region and dated to this period reveal Roman villas with signs of abandonment and deliberate destruction.[57] The devastation forced Valens to officially reduce taxes on the populations of Mœsia and Scythia.[58]

## 378: The Battle of Adrianople

[edit]

Main article: Battle of Adrianople

Although Valens had completed negotiations with the Persians earlier in 377, he had been forced to remain on the Eastern frontier for the rest of the year because of a major uprising by the Saracens affecting provinces from Phoenice south as far as Egypt.[59] Valens finally extracted himself from the Eastern front in early 378 and arrived with most of his army in Constantinople on 30 May 378. His entry into the city caused small riots against him.[60][61][62][63] According to the Historia Ecclesiastica of Socrates Scholasticus, the citizens of the capital accused Emperor Valens of neglecting their defense, exposing them to the raids of the Goths who now threatened Constantinople itself and urged him to leave the city and confront the invaders instead of continuing to delay.[64] Valens initially used Saracen auxiliaries newly recruited at the close of his recent war with them to begin clearing Gothic raiders from the outskirts of Constantinople.[65] After twelve days he was able to leave the city and moved with his army to his imperial villa Melanthias, west of Constantinople, on 12 June. There he distributed pay, supplies and speeches to his soldiers to boost morale.[66][67][68]

Blaming Traianus for the bloody draw at The Willows, Valens demoted him and appointed Sebastianus, who had arrived from Italy, to command and organize the Eastern Roman army. Sebastianus set out with a small force, drawn from the Emperor's own Scholae Palatinae,[c] to engage separated Gothic raiding bands. He went first to Adrianople and such was the fear of the roving Goths, the city needed much persuasion to open its gates to him. After this, Sebastianus scored a few small victories. In one instance, he waited until nightfall to ambush a sleeping Gothic warband along the river Hebrus and slaughtered most of them. The loot Sebastianus brought back was, according to Ammianus, too much for Adrianople to hold. Sebastianus' success convinced Fritigern to recall his raiding parties to the area of Cabyle, lest they be picked off piecemeal.[70][71]

Western Roman Emperor Gratian had meant to join up with Valens' army but events in the West detained him. First there was an invasion by the Lentienses into Gaul in February 378, which Gratian defeated at the battle of Argentovaria.[72] Then intelligence came from the other side of the Rhine warning of barbarian preparations for more invasions. This forced Gratian to preemptively cross the river himself and bring the situation under control as he successfully defeated the Alemanni. This took time however, and it was not until August that Gratian sent a message declaring his victories and his imminent arrival. Noel Lenski has argued that Gratian's delays in moving eastward to support his uncle can in part be attributed to a rivalry between the two detectable in various sources.[73] Valens, who had been impatiently waiting since June for the Western Roman army, was envious of the glory of his nephew and that of Sebastianus, so when he heard that the Goths were moving south towards Adrianople, Valens decamped his army and marched there to head them off. Roman scouting erroneously reported that the Goths, who were seen raiding near Nika, numbered only 10,000 fighting men. Around 7 August Ricomer returned from the West with the Western armies' advanced guard and a new message: Gratian was nearing the Succi pass which led to Adrianople and he advised his uncle to wait for him. Valens called a council of war to decide the issue. According to Ammianus, Sebastianus advocated for an immediate assault upon the Goths and that Victor cautioned to wait for Gratian. According to Eunapius, Sebestianus said they should wait. In any case, the council and Valens decided to attack immediately, egged on by court flatterers of the easy victory to come.[74][75]

The Battle of Adrianople saw one of the worst defeats ever suffered by the Roman army.[76] Map of the battle, according to the History Department of the US Military Academy.

The Goths sent envoys led by a Christian priest to the Romans to negotiate on the night of 8 August. With them Fritigern sent two letters. The first stipulated that the Goths only wanted lands in Thrace and in exchange would ally themselves to the Romans. The second letter, privately addressed to Valens, said that Fritigern truly wanted peace but the Romans would have to stay mobilized so that he could enforce the peace on his own people. Whether Fritigern was earnest or not is unknown, as Valens rejected the proposal. On the morning of 9 August, Valens left his treasury, imperial seal and civilian officials in Adrianople and marched north to engage the Goths. At around two in the afternoon the Romans came within sight of the Gothic wagon fort. Unlike the Romans, the Goths were well rested and the two sides drew up into battle formations. Fritigern sent more peace envoys and had long since sent for the aid of the Greuthungi cavalry under Alatheus and Saphrax who were separated from the main Gothic body. These remained undetected by Roman scouts.[77][78][79]

The Eastern Roman army withered under the hot summer sun and the Goths lit fires to blow smoke and ash into the Roman formations. Valens reconsidered the peace offer and was preparing to send Ricomer to meet with Fritigern when two Roman elite Scholae Palatinae units, the Scutarii under Cassio and the Sagittarii under Bacurius, engaged the Goths without orders. This forced the Battle of Adrianople to begin. As the armies engaged, the Greuthungi and Alan cavalry arrived and swung the battle in favor of the Goths. The Roman left flank was surrounded and destroyed and a rout began all along the lines which became a bloodbath for the Roman forces. They were so tightly packed they could not maneuver and some could not lift their arms at all. Few managed to run.[80][81][82]

> And so the barbarians, their eyes blazing with frenzy, were pursuing our men, in whose veins the blood was chilled with numb horror: some fell without knowing who struck them down, others were buried beneath the mere weight of their assailants; some were slain by the sword of a comrade; for though they often rallied, there was no ground given, nor did anyone spare those who retreated. Besides all this, the roads were blocked by many who lay mortally wounded, lamenting the torment of their wounds; and with them also mounds of fallen horses filled the plains with corpses. To these ever irreparable losses, so costly to the Roman state, a night without the bright light of the moon put an end.[83]

Sebastianus, Traianus, tribune Aequitius and thirty-five senior officers had been slain, while Ricomer, Victor and Saturninus had escaped. Two-thirds of the Eastern Roman army lay dead upon the field.[84] The total manpower loss may have been as high as 26,000 of an original force of 40,000.[85] There are conflicting stories as to what happened to the Emperor himself. One claims that he was wounded and dragged off the field by some of his men to a farmhouse. The Goths approached it and were shot at with arrows, which caused the Goths to burn it down with the Emperor inside. The other report states Valens was slain in combat on the field with his army. Whatever happened, his body was never found.[86]

The Goths, invigorated by their incredible victory, besieged Adrianople but the city resisted. Its walls were strengthened, huge stones were placed behind the gates and arrows, stones, javelins and artillery rained down upon the attackers. The Goths lost men but made no progress. So they resorted to trickery: they ordered some Roman traitors to pretend to be fleeing from the Goths and infiltrate the city, where they were to set fires to allow the Goths, while the citizens were busy putting the fires out, to attack the undefended walls. The plan did not work. The Roman traitors were welcomed into the city but when their stories did not match, they were imprisoned and tortured. They confessed to the trap and were beheaded. The Goths launched another assault but it too failed. With this final defeat, the Goths gave up and marched away.[87] They together with some Huns and Alans went first to Perinthus and then to Constantinople. There they were fended off in the small battle of Constantinople with the help of the city's Arab garrison. At one moment, an Arab dressed only in a loincloth rushed forward against the Goths, slit one of their throats and sucked out the blood. This terrified the Goths and combined with the immense size of the city and its walls, they decided to march off once again to plunder the countryside.[88][89]

With Valens dead, the Eastern Roman Empire had to operate without an Emperor. The magister militum of the East, Julius, feared the Gothic populations elsewhere in the Eastern Roman Empire, both civilians and those Goths serving within army units across the Empire. After the events of Adrianople, they could ally themselves to Fritigern and spread the crisis to even more provinces. Julius therefore had those Goths near the frontier lured together and massacred. By 379, word reached the Goths in the interior provinces of the massacres and some rioted, especially in Asia Minor. The Romans put down the riots and slaughtered the Goths in those places as well, both innocent and guilty.[90][d]

## 379–382: Theodosius I and the end of the war

[edit]

The new Emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire, Theodosius I. Legend: DN THEODOSIVS P F AVG

For the events of the Gothic War between 379 and 382, there are few sources, and accounts become more confused, especially concerning the rise of Theodosius I as the new Eastern Roman Emperor. Theodosius, born in Hispania, was the son of a successful general. As dux Mœsiae, he campaigned in the eastern Balkans against the Sarmatians in 374. After his father fell victim to court intrigue following the death of Western Roman Emperor Valentinian I, Theodosius decided to retire to his estates in Spain. Why he was recalled to the East is a mystery. Perhaps his military experience and the critical need for it in any new emperor played a part. It seems Theodosius regained his post as dux Mœsiae. He may have been campaigning against the Goths by late 378. On 19 January 379, Theodosius was made emperor. Sources are silent on how this happened. Whether Gratian initiated Theodosius' elevation himself or the surviving army in the East forced Gratian to accept Theodosius as his colleague is unknown. Whatever the cause, Gratian did acknowledge Theodosius as his co-emperor but promptly left for the West to deal with the Alemanni. Gratian offered little help to Theodosius for dealing with the Goths, outside of giving him control of the Western imperial dioceses of Dacia and Macedonia.[92][93][94]

Theodosius set about recruiting a new army at his headquarters in Thessalonica.[95] Farmers were drafted, and barbarian mercenaries from beyond the Danube were bought. The drafting of farmers created much resentment. Some mutilated their own thumbs, but many more hid themselves or deserted with the help of landowners, who were not pleased with losing their workers to the army. Theodosius responded with many harsh laws punishing those who hid deserters and rewarding those who turned them in. Even those who mutilated themselves were still forced into the Roman military.[96]

Theodosius' general Modares, a Goth himself, won a minor victory against Fritigern. Even small victories such as these were massively lauded by imperial propagandists; there are records of victory celebrations equaling half that of the previous seven decades combined. Theodosius needed victories and needed to be seen as dealing with the Gothic crisis.[97]

In 380, the Goths split.[e] The Greuthungi went to Illyricum and invaded the Western province of Pannonia. What happened is again disputed; they were either defeated by Gratian's forces, or they peaceably signed a deal that settled them in Pannonia. The Thervings went south into Macedonia and Thessaly. Theodosius with his new army marched to meet them but, filled with unreliable barbarians and raw recruits, it melted away. The barbarian soldiers joined Fritigern, and many Romans deserted. With victory the Thervings were free to force the local Roman cities in this new region to pay them tribute. It was then that the Western Roman Empire finally offered some help. Having ended the Gothic invasion of Pannonia, Gratian met Theodosius at Sirmium and directed his generals Arbogast and Bauto to help drive the Goths back into Thrace, which they successfully accomplished by the summer of 381. Theodosius meanwhile left for Constantinople, where he stayed. After years of war, the defeat of two Roman armies and continued stalemate, peace negotiations were opened.[99][100][101]

## Peace and consequences

[edit]

Ricomer and Saturninus conducted the negotiations for the Romans and peace was declared on 3 October 382.[102] By then, the Gothic commanders from Adrianople were gone; Fritigern, Alatheus and Saphrax are never again mentioned in the ancient histories and their ultimate fates are unknown. Speculation ranges from death in battle to overthrown as the price for peace.[103][104]

In the peace, the Romans recognized no overall leader of the Goths and the Goths were nominally incorporated into the Roman Empire. The Romans gained a military alliance with them as foederati: the Goths would be drafted into the Roman army and in special circumstances could be called upon to field full armies for the Romans. What differed from traditional Roman practice was that the Goths were given lands inside the Roman Empire itself, in the provinces of Scythia, Mœsia and possibly Macedonia, under their own authority and were not dispersed. This allowed them to stay together as a unified people with their own internal laws and cultural traditions. To seal the agreement, Theodosius threw the Goths a large feast.[105][106]

Themistius, a Roman orator and imperial propagandist, while acknowledging that the Goths could not be militarily defeated, sold the peace as a victory for the Romans who had won the Goths over to their side and turned them into farmers and allies. He believed that in time the barbarian Goths would become steadfast Romans themselves like the barbarian Galatians had before them.[107]

> For just suppose that this destruction was an easy matter and that we possessed the means to accomplish it without suffering any consequences, although from past experience this was neither a foregone nor likely conclusion, nevertheless just suppose, as I said, that this solution lay within our power. Was it then better to fill Thrace with corpses or with farmers? To make it full of tombs or living men? To progress through a wilderness or a cultivated land? To count up the number of the slaughtered or those who till the soil? To colonize it with Phrygians and Bithynians perhaps, or to live in harmony with those we have subdued.[108][109]

> All that [military] ingenuity of ours has proved useless; only your [Theodosius'] advice and your judgment provided an invincible resistance and the victory you won through these inner resources of yours was finer than it would have been had you prevailed by arms. For you have not destroyed those who wronged us but appropriated them. You did not punish them by seizing their land but have acquired more farmers for us. You did not slaughter them like wild beasts but charmed away their savagery just as if someone, after trapping a lion or a leopard in nets, were not to kill it but to accustom it to being a beast of burden. These fire-breathers, harder on the Romans than Hannibal was, have now come over to our side. Tame and submissive, they entrust their persons and their arms to us, whether the emperor wants to employ them as farmers or as soldiers.[110][111]

Despite these hopes, the Gothic War changed the way the Roman Empire dealt with barbarian peoples, both out of and within the imperial border. The Therving Goths would now be able to negotiate their position with Rome, with force if necessary, as a unified people inside the borders of the Empire and would transform themselves into the Visigoths. At times they would act as friends and allies to the Romans, at other times as enemies. This change in Rome's relationship with barbarians would lead to the sack of Rome in 410.[112][113]

The Gothic War also affected the religion of the Empire. Valens had been an Arian Christian and his death at Adrianople helped pave the way for Theodosius to make Nicene Christianity the official form of Christianity for the Empire. The Goths, like many barbarian peoples, converted to Arianism.[114]

## See also

[edit]

* Sack of Rome (410)
* Late Roman army
* Late Ancient Christianity

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ Peter Heather finds it unconvincing that Valens, who wanted the Goths as auxiliaries in his army, would have them disarmed.[23]
2. ^ The exact location is unknown, but it is surmised that it was between Tomi and the mouth of the Danube, or perhaps nearer to Marcianople.[48]
3. ^ "three hundred soldiers from each legion"[69]
4. ^ What happened is disputed. Our two primary sources for the event, Ammianus and Zosimus, give differing accounts and dates. The account given here is Kulikowski's reading of the sequence of events.[91]
5. ^ The exact cause is disputed. Peter Heather speculates the split happened because the combined Gothic forces were simply too hard to feed.[98]

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Mitchell, 2007, p. 87.
2. ^ Lee, 2013, p. 28.
3. ^ Prusac, 2016, p. 74.
4. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 146.
5. ^ Wolfram, 1997, pp. 85–86.
6. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 145.
7. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 152.
8. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 145, 507.
9. ^ CAH, 1998, p. 98.
10. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 354-355.
11. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 152–153.
12. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 153, 161.
13. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 167-185.
14. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 316-319.
15. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 158.
16. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 161.
17. ^ Lenski, N. (1995). "The Gothic Civil War and the Date of the Gothic Conversion". Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies. 36: 51–87.
18. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 160–162.
19. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 158.
20. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI 4.
21. ^ Gibbon, 1776, pp. 1048–1049
22. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 130.
23. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 509.
24. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 163.
25. ^ Wolfram, 1997, p. 82.
26. ^ Burns, 1994, p. 24
27. ^ Burns, 1994, p. 24
28. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 131.
29. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 159.
30. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 164.
31. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 133.
32. ^ Burns, 1994, p. 26
33. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 133–134.
34. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 171.
35. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.6.1.
36. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.6.
37. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.6.7–8. Trans. J. C. Rolfe.
38. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 134.
39. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 136.
40. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 172–173.
41. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 182-185.
42. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 137.
43. ^ Burns, 1994, pp. 26–27.
44. ^ Burns, 1994, p. 27.
45. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.7.
46. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 137–138.
47. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 173.
48. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 137.
49. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 137–138.
50. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.7.
51. ^ Lenski, 2002, 330-331.
52. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.8.
53. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 137–138.
54. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.8.7–8. Trans. J. C. Rolfe.
55. ^ Hughs, Ian (2013). Imperial Brothers: Valentinian, Valens and the Disaster at Adrianople. Pen and Sword. p 170
56. ^ Coombs-Hoar, Adrian (2015), Eagles in the Dust: The Roman Defeat at Adrianopolis AD 378. Pen and Sword. pp. 62–63
57. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 175.
58. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 138.
59. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 204-207.
60. ^ Lenski, 2002, p. 335-336.
61. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 176–177.
62. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 139.
63. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.11.1.
64. ^ Socrates Scolasticus, Historia Ecclesiastica, IV.38.
65. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 206-207, 335.
66. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 139.
67. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.11.1.
68. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 177.
69. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.11.2. Trans. J. C. Rolfe.
70. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 139.
71. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.11.
72. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 177.
73. ^ Lenski, 2002, pp. 355-362.
74. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 140–142.
75. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 178–180.
76. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 123.
77. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 139–141.
78. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 177–180.
79. ^ CAH, 1998, p. 100.
80. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 139–141.
81. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 177–180.
82. ^ CAH, 1998, p. 100.
83. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.13.10–11. Trans. J. C. Rolfe.
84. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 143.
85. ^ Lenski, 2002, p. 339.
86. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 180.
87. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.15.
88. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI.16.
89. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 146.
90. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 146–147.
91. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 146–147.
92. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 149–150.
93. ^ Gibbon,1776, Chapter 26.
94. ^ Lee, 2007, p. 29.
95. ^ CAH, 1998, pp. 101–102.
96. ^ Williams, Friell, 1998, pp. 15–16.
97. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 150–151.
98. ^ Heather, 2005, p. 183.
99. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 183–185.
100. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 150–151.
101. ^ Heather, Moncur, 2001, p. 224.
102. ^ Heather, Moncur, 2001, p. 207.
103. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 185–186.
104. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 152–153.
105. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 185–186.
106. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, pp. 152–153.
107. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 163, 186, 511.
108. ^ Heather, Moncur, 2001, p. 280.
109. ^ Themistius, Oration 16.
110. ^ Panella, 2000, p. 225.
111. ^ Themistius, Oration 34.
112. ^ Kulikowski, 2006, p. 145.
113. ^ Heather, 2005, pp. 186, 502.
114. ^ Wolfram, 1997, p. 87.

## Sources

[edit]

Primary sources

* Ammianus Marcellinus, The History, XXXI.

Secondary sources

* Burns, Thomas S. (1994). Barbarians Within the Gates of Rome: A Study of Roman Military Policy and the Barbarians, Ca. 375–425 A.D. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-31288-4.
* Cameron, A.; Garnsey, P. (1998). The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 13\. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-05440-9.
* Gibbon, Edward (1776). The History of the Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-043393-7. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
* Heather, P.; Moncur, D. (2001). Politics, Philosophy and Empire in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius. Translated Texts for Historians. Vol. 36\. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. ISBN 978-1-84631-382-0.
* Heather, P. (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire. ISBN 978-0-19-515954-7.
* Kulikowski, M. (2007). Rome's Gothic Wars. ISBN 978-0-521-8-4633-2.
* Lee, A. D. (2007). War in Late Antiquity: A Social History. Ancient World at War. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-22925-4.
* Lee, A. D. (2013). From Rome to Byzantium AD 363 to 565: The Transformation of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-2791-2.
* Lenski, N. (2002). Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century AD. ISBN 978-0520283893.
* Mitchell, Stephen (2007). A History of the Later Roman Empire, AD 284–641: The Transformation of the Ancient World. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-0856-0.
* Panella, R. J. (2000). The Private Orations of Themistius. Berkeley: University of California Press.
* Prusac, Marina (2016). From Face to Face: Recarving of Roman Portraits and the Late-antique Portrait Arts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-32184-7.
* Williams, S.; Friell, J. G. P. (1998) [1994]. Theodosius: The Empire at Bay. Roman Imperial Biographies. New York: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07447-5.
* Wolfram, Herwig (1997) [1990]. The Roman Empire and Its Germanic Peoples. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-08511-4.

* v
* t
* e

Ancient Roman wars

Wars of the
Roman Republic|

* Roman expansion in Italy
* Roman–Etruscan Wars
* Roman-Aequian wars
* Roman–Latin wars
* Roman–Hernici conflicts
* Roman–Volscian wars
* Roman–Sabine wars
* Samnite Wars
* Pyrrhic War
* Roman–Gallic wars
* Punic Wars
* First
* Second
* Third
* Illyro-Roman Wars
* Macedonian Wars
* First
* Second
* Third
* Fourth
* Roman–Seleucid war
* Galatian War
* Roman conquest of the Iberian Peninsula
* Celtiberian Wars
* Lusitanian War
* Numantine War
* Sertorian War
* Cantabrian Wars
* Achaean War
* War of Aristonicus
* Jugurthine War
* Cimbrian War
* Servile Wars
* First
* Second
* Third
* Social War
* Bellum Octavianum
* Sulla's civil war
* Mithridatic Wars
* First
* Second
* Third
* Gallic Wars
* Julius Caesar's invasions of Britain
* Roman–Parthian Wars
* Caesar's civil war
* War of Mutina
* Liberators' civil war
* Bellum Siculum
* Perusine War
* War of Actium

Wars of the
Roman Empire|

* Germanic wars
* Marcomannic Wars
* Gothic War
* Roman conquest of Britain
* Boudican revolt
* Armenian War
* Civil war of 69
* Jewish–Roman wars
* Domitian's Dacian War
* Trajan's Dacian Wars
* Roman–Persian Wars
* Civil wars of the Third Century
* Wars of the fall of the Western Roman Empire

Military history of ancient Rome

* v
* t
* e

Germanic peoples

Ethnolinguistic group of Northern European origin primarily identified as speakers of Germanic languages

History|

* Nordic Bronze Age
* Germania
* Pre-Roman Iron Age
* Roman Iron Age
* Romano-Germanic culture
* Germanic Iron Age
* Viking Age

Early culture|

* Architecture
* Art
* Calendar
* Clothing
* Family
* Festivals
* Folklore
* Proto-Germanic folklore
* Anglo-Saxon mythology
* Continental Germanic mythology
* Norse mythology)
* Funerary practices
* Anglo-Saxon
* Norse
* Law
* Anglo-Saxon
* Norse
* Literature
* Anglo-Saxon
* Norse
* Names
* Gothic
* Numbers
* Paganism
* Anglo-Saxon
* Gothic
* Norse
* Rings
* Scripts
* Gothic alphabet
* Runes
* Sippe
* Symbology
* Warfare
* Anglo-Saxon
* Gothic and Vandal
* Viking

Languages|

* Germanic parent language
* Proto-Germanic language
* East Germanic languages
* North Germanic languages
* West Germanic languages

Groups|

* Alemanni
* Brisgavi
* Bucinobantes
* Lentienses
* Raetovari
* Adrabaecampi
* Angles
* Anglo-Saxons
* Ambrones
* Ampsivarii
* Angrivarii
* Armalausi
* Auiones
* Avarpi
* Baemi
* Baiuvarii
* Banochaemae
* Bastarnae
* Batavi
* Belgae
* Germani cisrhenani
* Atuatuci
* Caeroesi
* Condrusi
* Eburones
* Paemani
* Segni
* Morini
* Nervii
* Bateinoi
* Betasii
* Brondings
* Bructeri
* Burgundians
* Buri
* Cananefates
* Caritni
* Casuari
* Chaedini
* Chaemae
* Chamavi
* Chali
* Charudes
* Chasuarii
* Chattuarii
* Chatti
* Chauci
* Cherusci
* Cimbri
* Cobandi
* Corconti
* Cugerni
* Danes
* Dauciones
* Dulgubnii
* Favonae
* Firaesi
* Fosi
* Franks
* Ripuarian Franks
* Salian Franks
* Frisiavones
* Frisii
* Gambrivii
* Geats
* Gepids
* Goths
* Crimean Goths
* Greuthungi
* Gutones
* Ostrogoths
* Thervingi
* Thracian Goths
* Visigoths
* Gutes
* Harii
* Hermunduri
* Heruli
* Hilleviones
* Ingaevones
* Irminones
* Istvaeones
* Jutes
* Juthungi
* Lacringi
* Lemovii
* Lombards
* Heaðobards
* Lugii
* Diduni
* Helisii
* Helveconae
* Manimi
* Nahanarvali
* Marcomanni
* Marsacii
* Marsi
* Mattiaci
* Nemetes
* Njars
* Nuithones
* Osi
* Quadi
* Reudigni
* Rugii
* Rugini
* Saxons
* Semnones
* Sicambri
* Sciri
* Sitones
* Suarines
* Suebi
* Sunici
* Swedes
* Taifals
* Tencteri
* Teutons
* Thelir
* Thuringii
* Toxandri
* Treveri
* Triboci
* Tubantes
* Tulingi
* Tungri
* Ubii
* Usipetes
* Vagoth
* Vandals
* Hasdingi
* Silingi
* Vangiones
* Varisci
* Victohali
* Vidivarii
* Vinoviloth
* Warini

Christianization|

* Gothic Christianity
* Christianization of the Franks
* Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England
* Christianization of Scandinavia
* Christianization of Iceland

* Category

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template