History of the Chinese language

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "History of the Chinese language" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (October 2023)

|

You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Chinese.  (October 2023) Click [show] for important translation instructions.

* View a machine-translated version of the Chinese article.
* Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
* Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 352 articles in the main category, and specifying`|topic=` will aid in categorization.
* Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
* You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is `Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:漢語史]]; see its history for attribution.`
* You may also add the template `{{Translated|zh|漢語史}}` to the talk page.
* For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

|

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

The earliest historical linguistic evidence of the spoken Chinese language dates back approximately 4500 years,[1] while examples of the writing system that would become written Chinese are attested in a body of inscriptions made on bronze vessels and oracle bones during the Late Shang period (c. 1250 - 1050 BCE),[2][3] with the very oldest dated to c. 1200 BCE.[4]

## Proto-Sinitic (before 1250 BCE)

[edit]

480km
298miles

Origin

One hypothetical scenario for the homeland and spread of Proto-Sino-Tibetan speakers between 3250 and 1600 BCE, based on a 2019 database of comparative archaeological data developed by Laurent Sagart et al.[5]

The oldest attested written Chinese—comprising the oracle bone inscriptions made during the 13th century BCE by the Shang dynasty royal house in modern Anyang, Henan—is also the earliest direct evidence of the Sinitic languages. Most experts agree that Sinitic languages share a common ancestor with the Tibeto-Burman languages, forming the primary Sino-Tibetan family. However, the precise placement of Sinitic within Sino-Tibetan is a matter of debate.[6] Reconstructing the common ancestor of all Sino-Tibetan languages, known as Proto-Sino-Tibetan—a language last spoken thousands of years before the historical record—has been challenging. Even though Chinese characters are logographs that do not encode the sounds of speech directly, written Chinese allows for the partial reconstruction of how ancient forms of the language sounded. No such evidence exists for earlier stages, including where Sinitic would have split from other branches of Sino-Tibetan.[7] There are several reasons that the comparative method conventionally used in historical linguistics has had limited success in reconstructing the history of Sino-Tibetan compared to the results achieved with other major language families like Indo-European:[8]

1. Relatively few Sino-Tibetan languages, of which Chinese is one, have written traditions old enough to provide useful comparative evidence.
2. In areas where Sino-Tibetan languages are spoken, there have historically been high rates of population transfer. This has resulted in many areal features shared between languages, making it difficult to determine which relationships—not only cognates in vocabulary, but also grammatical features—are phylogenetic.
3. Languages that make heavier use of morphology generally provide more data useful in historical comparisons, i.e. the conjugated and derived forms of words. Compared to Indo-European languages like Latin, Greek, and Sanskrit, Sino-Tibetan languages are highly isolating and exhibit very little morphology, making it difficult to identify cognates.

## Pre-Classical period (1300–500 BCE)

[edit]

Old Chinese, sometimes known as "Archaic Chinese", is ancestral to all current Chinese languages. The first known use of the Chinese writing system is divinatory inscriptions into tortoise shells and oracle bones during the Shang dynasty (1766–1122 BCE). During the first half of the Zhou dynasty (1122–256 BCE), writing descended from the Shang is found in texts including inscriptions on bronze artefacts, the Classic of Poetry, the history of the Book of Documents, and portions of the I Ching. Phonetic elements found in the majority of Chinese characters also provide hints to their Old Chinese pronunciations, as do the pronunciations of borrowed Chinese characters in Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese.[citation needed] Old Chinese was not wholly uninflected. It possessed a rich sound system in which aspiration or rough breathing differentiated the consonants, but was probably still without tones. Work on reconstructing Old Chinese started with Qing dynasty philologists.[citation needed]

## Classical period (500 BCE – 1 CE)

[edit]

Words in Old Chinese were generally monosyllabic; as such, each character denoted an independent word.[9] Affixes could be added to form a new word, which was often written with the same single character. In many cases, the pronunciations then diverged due to the systematic sound changes caused by the affixes. For example, many modern readings reflect the departing tone present in Middle Chinese, which many scholars now believe is a reflex of a derivational suffix /*-s/ that served a range of semantic functions in Old Chinese. This is possibly the only example of inflectional morphology extant in what was otherwise an analytic language:[10][11]

Evolution of character senses as caused by the Old Chinese 去聲 (qùshēng) Character | OC[α] |  | MC[β] |  | mod. | Gloss

|
|
|
|
|
|

傳[12] | *drjon | →  | drjwen' | →  | chuánⓘ | 'to transmit'
*drjons | →  | drjwenH | →  | zhuànⓘ | 'a record'
磨[12] | *maj | →  | ma | →  | móⓘ | 'to grind'
*majs | →  | maH | →  | mòⓘ | 'grindstone'
宿[13] | *sjuk | →  | sjuwk | →  | sùⓘ | 'to stay overnight'
*sjuks | →  | sjuwH | →  | xiùⓘ | 'celestial mansion'
説[14] | *hljot | →  | sywet | →  | shuōⓘ | 'speak'
*hljots | →  | sywejH | →  | shuìⓘ | 'exhort'

Another common sound change occurred between voiced and voiceless initials, though the phonemic voicing distinction has disappeared in most modern varieties. This is believed to reflect an Old Chinese de-transitivising prefix, but scholars disagree on whether the voiced or voiceless form reflects the original root. Each pair of examples below reflects two words of opposite transitivity.[citation needed]

Evolution of character transitivity pairs from Old Chinese Character | OC[α] |  | MC[β] |  | mod. | Gloss

|
|
|
|
|
|

見[15] | *kens | →  | kenH | →  | jiànⓘ | 'to see'
*gens | →  | henH | →  | xiànⓘ | 'to appear'
敗[15] | *prats | →  | pæjH | →  | bàiⓘ[a] | 'to defeat'
*brats | →  | bæjH | →  | 'to be defeated'
折[16] | *tjat | →  | tsyet | →  | zhéⓘ | 'to bend'
*djat | →  | dzyet | →  | shéⓘ | 'to be broken by bending'

## Eastern Han period (1–300 CE)

[edit]

Main article: Eastern Han Chinese

## Middle Chinese (300–1100)

[edit]

Middle Chinese was a form of Chinese used during the Sui, Tang, and Song dynasties between the 4th and 10th centuries. It can be divided into two periods: Early Middle Chinese is documented in the Qieyun (601), the first rime dictionary, and a later revision in the Guangyun (1008). Late Middle Chinese is reflected by rime tables such as the Yunjing. The evidence for the pronunciation of Middle Chinese comes from several sources: modern dialect variations, rime dictionaries, foreign transliterations, rime tables constructed by ancient Chinese philologists to summarize the phonetic system, and Chinese phonetic translations of foreign words.

## Early Modern Chinese (1100–1900)

[edit]

The development of Chinese has been complex. The prevalence of Mandarin throughout northern China is due in part to the open plains of northern China, in contrast to the mountains and rivers of southern China that enabled greater linguistic diversity.[citation needed] Moreover, Mandarin, called Guanhua ('officials' speech') was at first based on the Nanjing dialect, and became the dominant vernacular in northern China during the early Qing. It was gradually challenged by the variety used by scholar-officials of Beijing. In the 17th century, the Qing began setting up orthoepy academies to conform pronunciation to the Beijing standard, but had little success.[citation needed]

## Modern Chinese (1900–present)

[edit]

During the late 19th century, the Beijing dialect finally replaced the Nanjing dialect in the imperial court. For the general population, although varieties of Mandarin were already widely spoken in China, a single standard of Mandarin did not exist. Non-Mandarin speakers in southern China continued to use their local varieties in most aspects of life. The area where the new Beijing court dialect was used was thus fairly limited.[citation needed]

This situation changed with the creation of an elementary school education system committed to teaching Standard Chinese in both mainland China and Taiwan, but not Hong Kong or Macau. At the time that it was being widely introduced in these places, the British colony of Hong Kong did not use it at all. In Hong Kong, Macau, Guangdong and parts of Guangxi, Cantonese remains the everyday language used in business and education. The Chinese language has adopted a wide array of foreign words, which have been adapted to Chinese dialects and pronunciation, referred to as the sinification of foreign words.[citation needed]

After the establishment of the Kuomintang (KMT), the 1913 Commission on the Unification of Pronunciation planned to use Guanhua as the basis of a national dialect, redubbing it as Guoyu ('national language').[17] Continuing previous policies, the People's Republic of China sought to further standardize a common language, now dubbed Standard Chinese, for national and political unity. The "Decision of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee and State Council Concerning Elimination of Illiteracy" of March 1956 solidified the Communist Party's plans to reform the country's traditional characters to a simplified writing system to improve literacy.[18]

Besides the standard writing systems promoted by the government, no other written form of Chinese has seen widespread use to an extent comparable to that of Standard Chinese.[19]

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ a b According to Baxter's 1992 reconstruction of Old Chinese
2. ^ a b Using Baxter's transcription for Middle Chinese

1. ^ In this case, the pronunciations have converged in Standard Chinese, but they have not in other varieties.

## References

[edit]

### Citations

[edit]

1. ^ Norman 1988, p. 4.
2. ^ Kern 2010, p. 1.
3. ^ Keightley 1978, p. xvi.
4. ^ Bagley 2004; Boltz 1999, p. 109.
5. ^ Sagart et al. 2019, pp. 10319–10320.
6. ^ Thurgood & LaPolla 2017, p. 5; Handel 2015, p. 37–38.
7. ^ Norman 1988, pp. 12–16.
8. ^ Handel 2015, p. 40–41.
9. ^ Norman 1988, p. 58.
10. ^ Zhang, Shuya (2022), "Rethinking the *-s suffix in Old Chinese: with new evidence from Situ Rgyalrong" (PDF), Folia Linguistica, 56 (s43 – s1): 129–167, doi:10.1515/flin-2022-2014, ISSN 0165-4004, S2CID 248002645s43+–+s1&rft.pages=129-167&rft.date=2022&rft_id=https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248002645#id-name=S2CID&rft.issn=0165-4004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/flin-2022-2014&rft.aulast=Zhang&rft.aufirst=Shuya&rft_id=https://hal.science/hal-03636079/file/Rethinking_the_s_suffix_in_Old_Chinese.pdf&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:History+of+the+Chinese+language" class="Z3988">
11. ^ Baxter 1992, pp. 315–317.
12. ^ a b Baxter 1992, p. 315.
13. ^ Baxter 1992, p. 316.
14. ^ Baxter 1992, pp. 197, 305.
15. ^ a b Baxter 1992, p. 218.
16. ^ Baxter 1992, p. 219.
17. ^ DeFrancis 1984, p. 224.
18. ^ DeFrancis 1984, p. 295.
19. ^ Norman 1988, p. 3.

### Works cited

[edit]

* Baxter, William H. (1992), A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-012324-1
* Boltz, William G. (1999), "Language and Writing", in Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC, Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–123, doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521470308.004, ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8, retrieved 3 April 2019 - via Google Books
* Bagley, Robert (2004), "Anyang Writing and the Origin of the Chinese Writing System", in Houston, Stephen (ed.), The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process, Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–249, ISBN 978-0-521-83861-0 - via Google Books
* DeFrancis, John (1984), The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-1068-9
* Keightley, David (1978), Sources of Shang history: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze-Age China, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-02969-9
* Kern, Martin (2010), "Early Chinese literature, beginnings through Western Han", in Owen, Stephen (ed.), The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature: To 1375, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–115, ISBN 978-0-521-85558-7
* Norman, Jerry (1988), Chinese, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3
* Sagart, Laurent; Jacques, Guillaume; Lai, Yunfan; Ryder, Robin; Thouzeau, Valentin; Greenhill, Simon J. & List, Johann-Mattis (2019), "Dated language phylogenies shed light on the history of Sino-Tibetan", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116 (21): 10317–10322, Bibcode:2019PNAS..11610317S, doi:10.1073/pnas.1817972116, PMC 6534992, PMID 31061123
* Origin of Sino-Tibetan language family revealed by new research, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 6 May 2019 - via ScienceDaily
* Tam, Gina Anne (2020), Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860–1960, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-108-77640-0
* Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J., eds. (2017) [2003], The Sino-Tibetan Languages (2nd ed.), Routledge, ISBN 978-1-138-78332-4
* Vogelsang, Kai (2021), Introduction to Classical Chinese, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-198-83497-7
* Wang, William S.-Y.; Sun, Chaofen, eds. (2015), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-199-85633-6
* Handel, Zev, "The Classification of Chinese", in Wang & Sun (2015), pp. 34–45

* v
* t
* e

Histories of the world's languages

Indo-European|

| Germanic|

* Afrikaans
* Danish
* Dutch
* English
* German
* Icelandic
* Norwegian
* Scots
* Swedish
* Yiddish

|

Celtic|

* Irish
* Welsh

Italic|

* Catalan
* French (Quebec)
* Galician
* Italian
* Latin
* Portuguese
* Romanian
* Spanish

Baltic|

* Latvian
* Lithuanian

Slavic|

* Belarusian
* Bosnian
* Bulgarian
* Czech
* Macedonian
* Polish
* Russian (in Ukraine)
* Rusyn
* Serbo-Croatian
* Slovak
* Slovene
* Ukrainian

Indo-Iranian|

* Bengali
* Hindustani
* Nepali
* Persian

Other|

* Albanian
* Greek

Uralic|

| Finnic|

* Estonian
* Finnish

|

Ugric|

* Hungarian

Kartvelian|

* Georgian
* Laz
* Mingrelian
* Svan

Other European|

* Basque

Afroasiatic|

* Arabic
* Aramaic
* Hebrew

Dravidian|

* Kannada
* Malayalam
* Tamil
* Telugu

Austroasiatic|

* Vietnamese

Austronesian|

* Tagalog
* Filipino
* Malay
* Sundanese
* Cebuano

Sino–Tibetan|

* Chinese
* Gan Chinese
* Standard Chinese

Japonic|

* Japanese

Koreanic|

* Korean

Iroquoian|

* Cherokee

Turkic|

* Azeri
* Turkish

Constructed|

* Esperanto
* Interlingua
* Interlingue
* Ido

* v
* t
* e

Chinese language

Sinitic languages

Major linguistic groups

| Mandarin|

| Northeastern|

* Changchun
* Harbin
* Shenyang
* Taz

|

Beijing|

* Beijing
* Taiwan

Jilu|

* Tianjin
* Jinan

Jiaoliao|

* Dalian
* Qingdao
* Weihai

Central Plains|

* Dongping
* Gangou
* Guanzhong
* Xi'an
* Luoyang
* Xuzhou
* Dungan
* Xinjiang

Southwestern|

* Sichuanese
* Chengdu–Chongqing
* (?) Minjiang
* Leshan
* Renshou–Fushun [zh]
* Zigong
* Kunming
* Nanping
* Wuhan
* Gui–Liu
* Wuming

Jianghuai|

* Nanjing
* Nantong
* Nanping

Lanyin|

* Lanzhou dialect [zh]
* Ürümqi dialect [zh]
* Xinjiang

Other|

* Junjiahua
* Qinjiang
* Gyami

Jin|

* Zhangjiakou–Hohhot
* Zhi–Yan

Wu|

| Taihu|

* Shanghai
* Suzhou
* Wuxi
* Changzhou
* (?) Hangzhou
* Shaoxing
* Ningbo
* Jinxiang
* Jiangyin
* Shadi

|

Taizhou Wu|

* Taizhou
* Tiantai

Oujiang|

* Wenzhou
* Rui'an
* Wencheng

Wuzhou|

* Jinhua

Chu–Qu|

* Quzhou
* Jiangshan
* Qingtian

Xuanzhou|

* Xuancheng

Huizhou|

* Ji-She [zh]
* Xiu-Yi [zh]
* Qi-De [zh]
* Yanzhou [zh]
* Jing-Zhan [zh]

Gan|

* Chang–Du
* Nanchang
* Yi–Liu
* Ying–Yi
* Da–Tong

Xiang|

* Changyi
* Changsha
* Loushao
* Shuangfeng
* Xiangxiang
* Wugang
* Ji–Xu
* Yong–Quan
* Qiyang

Min|

| Eastern|

| Houguan [zh]|

* Fuzhou
* Fuqing
* Changle
* Gutian
* Matsu

|

Fu–Ning [zh]|

* Ningde
* Fu'an

Other|

* Manjiang
* Zhongshan
* Longdu
* Nanlang

Pu–Xian|

* Putian
* Xianyou

Southern|

| Hokkien|

* Quanzhou
* Zhangzhou
* Amoy
* Chawan
* Taiwan
* Philippines
* Penang
* Medan
* Singapore
* Southern Malaysia

|

Teochew|

* Swatow
* Haklau
* Pontianak

Zhongshan|

* Sanxiang

Other|

* Zhenan
* Longyan

Leizhou|

* Zhanjiang

Hainan|

* Wenchang
* Haikou
* Banqiao

Inland|

* Northern
* Jian'ou
* Jianyang
* Central
* Shao–Jiang

Hakka|

* Huiyang [zh]
* Changting
* Meixian
* Pontianak
* Singkawang
* Taiwan
* Sixian
* Hailu
* Raoping
* Tingzhou
* Wuhua

Yue|

| Yuehai|

* Guangzhou
* Hong Kong
* Malaysia
* Xiguan
* Jiujiang
* Shiqi
* Weitou
* Dapeng

|

Siyi|

* Taishan
* Xinhui [zh]

Other|

* Gao–Yang
* Goulou
* Wu–Hua
* Yong–Xun
* Luo–Guang
* Qin–Lian

Pinghua|

* Northern Pinghua
* Tongdao
* Younian
* Southern Pinghua
* Yongjiang
* Guandao
* Rongjiang

Unclassified|

* Shaozhou Tuhua
* Xiangnan Tuhua
* Danzhou
* Badong Yao
* Shehua
* Waxiang
* Yeheni
* Huizhou
* Mai
* Laobeizi

(?) Macro-Bai|

* Bai
* Cai-Long
* Caijia
* Longjia
* Luren

Standard forms of Chinese

| Mandarin
(Standard Chinese)|

* Sichuanese
* Taiwanese
* Philippine
* Malaysian
* Singaporean

|

Other varieties|

* Cantonese
* Hokkien
* Hakka

History, phonology, and grammar

| History|

* Old Chinese
* Eastern Han
* Middle Chinese
* Old Mandarin
* Middle Mandarin
* Proto-Min
* Proto-Hakka
* Ba–Shu
* Gan

|

Phonology|

* Historical
* Old
* Old National
* Cantonese
* Hokkien
* Northern Wu
* Mandarin
* Literary and colloquial readings

Grammar|

* Numerals
* Classifiers
* Honorifics
* Cantonese grammar
* Classical grammar

Idioms|

* Chengyu
* Xiehouyu

Written Chinese and input methods

| Literary forms|

| Official|

* Classical
* Adoption
* in Japan
* in Vietnam
* Vernacular

|

* Written Cantonese
* Written Dungan
* Written Hokkien
* Written Sichuanese

Scripts|

| Logographic|

| Script styles|

* Oracle bone
* Bronze
* Seal
* Clerical
* Semi-cursive
* Cursive

|

* Chinese characters
* Simplified
* Traditional
* Punctuation

Braille|

* Cantonese
* Mainland Chinese
* Taiwanese
* Two-cell

Phonetic|

* Romanization
* Gwoyeu Romatzyh
* Hanyu Pinyin
* MPS II
* Postal
* Tongyong Pinyin
* Wade–Giles
* EFEO
* Lessing-Othmer
* Yale
* Cyrillization
* Dungan Cyrillic
* Bopomofo
* Cantonese Bopomofo
* Taiwanese Phonetic Symbols
* Taiwanese kana
* Taiwanese Hangul
* Xiao'erjing
* Nüshu

Input methods|

| Logographic|

* Biaoxingma
* Boshiamy [zh]
* Cangjie
* Simplified
* CKC
* Dayi
* Stroke count
* Wubi (Wang Ma)
* ZhengMa
* Q9

|

Pinyin|

* Google
* Microsoft
* Sogou

List of varieties of Chinese

Portals:

* Language
* History
* China

*[c.]: circa
*[OC]: Old Chinese
*[MC]: Middle Chinese
*[mod.]: Modern Standard Chinese
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template