Imagery debate

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (April 2023)

|

Imagery debate is a debate that concerns the nature of mental imagery, about how mental imagery represents information. It made philosophers take the concept of mental imagery seriously, and it helped philosophers to appreciate how variations in imagery can have a major impact on one's positions.[1][2][3][4][5]

## References[edit]

1. ^ Tye, Michael (1991). The imagery debate. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262700733.
2. ^ Kosslyn, Stephen Michael (1994). Image and brain : the resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262111843.
3. ^ Pylyshyn, Zenon W. (January 1981). "The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge". Psychological Review. 88 (1): 16–45. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.16. ISSN 1939-1471.
4. ^ Sterelny, Kim (December 1986). "The Imagery Debate". Philosophy of Science. 53 (4): 560–583. doi:10.1086/289340. ISSN 0031-8248.
5. ^ Nanay, Bence (2021). "Mental Imagery". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 30 April 2023.

This psychology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

|

* v
* t
* e

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template