Inconsistent comparison

Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged or deleted. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

An inconsistent comparison is a misleading argument popular in advertising. For example, an advertisement might say "product X is less expensive than product A, has better quality than product B, and has more features than product C". This is designed to give the impression that product X is better than products A, B, and C in all respects, but doesn't actually make that claim.[1] In fact, product A may be the most expensive, product B may be the lowest quality, and product C may have the fewest features of the three. So, the original statement really only means "product X is not the most expensive, lowest quality, or fewest featured product on the market". That would hardly be as effective of an advertisement, however.

## See also[edit]

* Apples and oranges
* Incomplete comparison
* Fallacy
* False advertising

## References[edit]

1. ^ "Inconsistent comparison:". 15 December 2010. Retrieved 26 March 2019.