Kings–Tulare Regional Station

General information
Location| Central Valley Highway
outside Hanford, California
Coordinates| 36°20′07″N 119°35′32″W﻿ / ﻿36.335141°N 119.592321°W﻿ / 36.335141; -119.592321
Owned by| California High-Speed Rail Authority
Construction
Structure type| elevated
History
Opening| 2030 (High-Speed Rail service)
Services
| Preceding station  |  California High-Speed Rail | Following station

|
|

Fresno

towards Merced

|  | Phase I

Central Valley Segment

|  | Bakersfield

Terminus

Location

Kings–Tulare Regional Station

Location within California

Kings–Tulare Regional Station is a planned California High-Speed Rail station serving Kings County and Tulare County, California. It will be located near the intersection of Hanford Expressway and Central Valley Highway,[1] just east of the city limits of Hanford and less than 20 miles (32 km) west of the larger city of Visalia. The construction of the station has been controversial, with Tulare County supporting the station while Kings County, where the station would be located, has strongly opposed the entire California High-Speed Rail project.[2][3]

## History[edit]

### Planning[edit]

The current Amtrak San Joaquin service in the Central Valley uses the BNSF Railway tracks through the center of Hanford, stopping at an existing station there. However, a high-speed rail route along this alignment was strongly opposed by Hanford city officials, who said that it would disrupt the city's historic downtown. This meant that only routes that bypassed Hanford city limits were considered. An alignment along Route 99 was ruled out due to the extra expense and uncertain cooperation from Union Pacific Railroad, which has its own track in the vicinity. This left routes through rural areas, which ran into opposition from farmers whose land would be taken.[4]

In October 2011 the Kings County Board of Supervisors voted to oppose all possible alignments through that county.[5] In December 2011 the Kings County Association of Governments turned down a station planning grant that it had already been approved for due to opposition within the county. Tulare County and the City of Visalia continued to pursue a similar grant, leading to complaints from Kings County officials that Tulare County was sidelining Kings County's jurisdiction.[2] Hanford officials also complained that the opening of the high-speed rail station would lead to a loss of service to the existing downtown Amtrak station, negatively affecting the city's tourism industry due to the new station being 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from the city center.[6]

The initial plans called for the high-speed rail line to diverge from the BNSF line and run east of Hanford city limits, with a west bypass not considered due to increased impacts on wetlands and farmland, negative effects on potential development between Hanford and Lemoore, and increased distance from Visalia. However, in October 2011 the California High-Speed Rail Authority recalled its draft environmental impact report to produce a new one that would consider both routes.[7] An initial report in April 2013 indicated that the western alternative with below-grade tracks was preferred.[8][9] However, in November 2013 the Authority approved the original eastern alignment for largely the same reasons that it was initially preferred,[10] along with the discovery that the groundwater in the western area was only 10 feet (3.0 m) to 15 feet (4.6 m) below ground level due to an impermeable clay formation, making a below-grade track unfeasible there.[9]

In August 2015, the Hanford City Council rejected contributing $100,000 to a planning grant that included a potential light rail line connecting the high-speed rail station to the centers of Hanford and Visalia, the Cross Valley Corridor. Tulare County had already approved its $100,000 contribution, and the California High-Speed Rail Authority had promised $600,000, but Hanford's rejection killed the entire grant. Tulare County and Visalia officials indicated that they would seek funding to plan for a connectivity study potentially including light rail even without the assistance of Kings County or Hanford.[11][12]

### Construction[edit]

In November 2019, it was announced that construction of the viaduct leading to the station would begin the following month. The design at this point had changed from an at-grade to an elevated station on a mile-long viaduct, with the benefits of having a smaller footprint, avoiding modifications to the Union Pacific Railroad line and an electrical transmission line at the location, and allowing potential Cross Valley Corridor service to be accessed at-grade beneath the high-speed rail tracks.[13]

## References[edit]

1. ^ "Final Environmental Document for South Valley High-Speed Rail Section Ready for Board Action". Valley Voice. 2014-05-01. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
2. ^ a b Nidever, Seth (2011-12-07). "Kings, Tulare counties spar over station". Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
3. ^ Calefati, Jessica (2014-01-10). "Tale of two bullet-train cities: Hanford, Visalia spar over $68 billion project". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
4. ^ Connell, Rich (2010-12-27). "Central Valley farmers take issue with proposed high-speed rail route". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
5. ^ Nidever, Seth (2011-10-12). "Supes say no to all county HSR routes". Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
6. ^ Yamashita, Eiji; Nidever, Seth (2011-10-05). "High-speed rail could nix Amtrak station". Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
7. ^ Sheehan, Tim (2011-10-06). "High-speed rail plan in Hanford to be revised". California Watch. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
8. ^ Sheehan, Tim (2013-04-03). "Engineers suggest west-of-Hanford route for high-speed trains". The Bakersfield Californian. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
9. ^ a b "High Speed Rail: East Of Hanford Route Now Favored". Sierra2theSea. 2013. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
10. ^ "Board selects high-speed rail route east of Hanford". The Business Journal. 2013-11-07. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
11. ^ Lindt, John (2015-08-05). "Hanford council nixes rail station planning grant". The Business Journal. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
12. ^ Camarena, Andrea (2015-10-07). "Visalia on-board with High Speed Rail study". The Foothills Sun-Gazette. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
13. ^ Lindt, John (2019-12-11). "Kings-Tulare HSR station platform construction to start". The Sun-Gazette Newspaper. Retrieved 2020-01-22.

* v
* t
* e

California High-Speed Rail

Main CAHSR articles|

* California High-Speed Rail (main page)
* California High-Speed Rail Authority
* Construction of CAHSR
* Route of CAHSR
* History of CAHSR
* Impacts of CAHSR
* Proposition 1A

Phase 1 stations

* San Francisco Transbay Transit Center
* San Francisco 4th and King Street
* Millbrae
* San José Diridon
* Gilroy
* Merced
* Madera
* Fresno
* Kings–Tulare
* Bakersfield
* Palmdale Transportation Center
* Burbank Airport
* Los Angeles Union Station
* Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs (station option)
* Fullerton Transportation Center (station option)
* Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC)

Articles related to Phase 1 route|

* Caltrain Downtown Rail Extension
* Caltrain Electrification
* Caltrain Bayshore Cutoff
* Diablo Range
* Pacheco Pass Tunnels
* Calaveras Fault
* Fresno River Viaduct
* San Joaquin River Viaduct
* Kings River Viaduct
* Tehachapi Mountains
* Tehachapi Pass
* San Gabriel Mountains

Connecting rail systems|

* Caltrain
* Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
* Muni Metro
* Altamont Corridor Express (ACE)
* Amtrak (Amtrak California)
* Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
* Los Angeles Metro Rail
* Metrolink
* Brightline West

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template