Metadata (CLI)

Common Language Infrastructure metadata about classes and class members

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Metadata" CLI – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

CLI metadata, on-disk representation

Filename extension|

`.exe`, `.dll`, `.winmd`

Magic number| 0x424A5342
Developed by| Microsoft,
Ecma International
Standard| ECMA-335 part II

Metadata, in the Common Language Infrastructure (CLI), refers to certain data structures embedded within the Common Intermediate Language (CIL) code that describes the high-level structure of the code. Metadata describes all classes and class members that are defined in the assembly, and the classes and class members that the current assembly will call from another assembly. The metadata for a method contains the complete description of the method, including the class (and the assembly that contains the class), the return type and all of the method parameters.

A CLI language compiler will generate the metadata and store this in the assembly containing the CIL. When the run-time executes CIL it will check to make sure that the metadata of the called method is the same as the metadata that is stored in the calling method. This ensures that a method can only be called with exactly the right number of parameters and exactly the right parameter types.

The Windows Runtime application platform, present in Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8, makes use of the CLI metadata format to describe component interfaces for code written in any of the supported programming languages. A difference in use within the Common Language Runtime is that an assembly typically does not contain any CIL instructions.[1]

## Attributes

[edit]

Developers can add metadata to their code through attributes. There are two types of attributes, custom and pseudo custom attributes, and to the developer these have the same syntax. Attributes in code are messages to the compiler to generate metadata. In CIL, metadata such as inheritance modifiers, scope modifiers, and almost anything that isn't either opcodes or streams, are also referred to as attributes.

A custom attribute is a regular class that inherits from the `Attribute` class. A custom attribute can be used on any method, property, class or entire assembly with the syntax: `[AttributeName(optional parameter, optional name=value pairs)]` as in:

[Custom]
[Custom(1)]
[Custom(1, Comment="yes")]

Custom attributes are used by CLI extensively. Windows Communication Framework uses attributes to define service contracts, ASP.NET uses these to expose methods as web services, LINQ to SQL uses them to define the mapping of classes to the underlying relational schema, Visual Studio uses them to group together properties of an object, the class developer indicates the category for the object's class by applying the `[Category]` custom attribute. Custom attributes are interpreted by application code and not the CLR. When the compiler sees a custom attribute it will generate custom metadata that is not recognised by the CLR. The developer has to provide code to read the metadata and act on it. As an example, the attribute shown in the example can be handled by the code:

class CustomAttribute : Attribute

private int paramNumber = 0;
private string comment = "";

public CustomAttribute() { }
public CustomAttribute(int num) { paramNumber = num; }

public String Comment

set { comment = value; }

The name of the class is mapped to the attribute name. The Visual C# compiler automatically adds the string "`Attribute`" at the end of any attribute name. Consequently, every attribute class name should end with this string, but it is legal to define an attribute without the `Attribute`-suffix. When affixing an attribute to an item, the compiler will look for both the literal name and the name with `Attribute` added to the end, i. e. if you were to write `[Custom]` the compiler would look for both `Custom` and `CustomAttribute`. If both exist, the compiler fails. The attribute can be prefixed with "`@`" if you don't want to risk ambiguity, so writing `[@Custom]` will not match `CustomAttribute`. Using the attribute invokes the constructor of the class. Overloaded constructors are supported. Name-Value pairs are mapped to properties, the name denotes the name of the property and the value supplied is set by the property.

Sometimes there is ambiguity concerning to what you are affixing the attribute. Consider the following code:

[Orange]
public int ExampleMethod(string input)

//method body goes here

What has been marked as orange? Is it the `ExampleMethod`, its return value, or perhaps the entire assembly? In this case, the compiler will default, and treat the attribute as being affixed to the method. If this is not what was intended, or if the author wishes to clarify their code, an attribute target may be specified. Writing `[return: Orange]` will mark the return value as orange, `[assembly: Orange]` will mark the entire assembly. The valid targets are `assembly`, `field`, `event`, `method`, `module`, `param`, `property`, `return` and `type`.

A pseudo-custom attribute is used just like regular custom attributes but they do not have a custom handler; rather the compiler has intrinsic awareness of the attributes and handles the code marked with such attributes differently. Attributes such as `Serializable` and `Obsolete` are implemented as pseudo-custom attributes. Pseudo-custom attributes should never be used by ILAsm, as it has adequate syntax to describe the metadata.[clarification needed]

## Metadata storage

[edit]

Assemblies contain tables of metadata. These tables are described by the CIL specification. The metadata tables will have zero or more entries and the position of an entry determines its index. When CIL code uses metadata it does so through a metadata token. This is a 32-bit value where the top 8 bits identify the appropriate metadata table, and the remaining 24 bits give the index of the metadata in the table. The Framework SDK contains a sample called `metainfo` that will list the metadata tables in an assembly, however, this information is rarely of use to a developer. Metadata in an assembly may be viewed using the ILDASM tool provided by the .NET Framework SDK.

In the CIL standard, metadata is defined in ILAsm (assembly language) form, an on-disk representation form for storage, and a form that is embedded into assemblies of the Portable Executable (PE, .exe or .dll) format. The PE form is based on the on-disk form.

## Reflection

[edit]

Main articles: Reflection in C# and Reflection (computer programming)

Reflection is the API used to read CLI metadata. The reflection API provides a logical view of metadata rather than the literal view provided by tools like metainfo. Reflection in version 1.1 of the .NET framework can be used to inspect the descriptions of classes and their members, and invoke methods. However, it does not allow runtime access to the CIL for a method. Version 2.0 of the framework allows the CIL for a method to be obtained.

## Other metadata tools

[edit]

Besides the `System.Reflection` namespace, other tools are also available that can be used to handle metadata. The Microsoft .NET Framework ships a CLR metadata manipulation library that is implemented in native code. Third-party tools to retrieve and manipulate metadata include PostSharp and Mono Cecil can also be used.

## See also

[edit]

* Java annotation

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "Windows Metadata (WinMD) files". Windows UWP applications. December 30, 2021.

* v
* t
* e

Common Language Infrastructure

Architecture|

* Application domain
* Code Access Security
* Common Intermediate Language
* instructions
* Common Type System
* Platform Invocation Services
* Virtual Execution System

Components|

* Assembly
* Delegate
* Global Assembly Cache
* Manifest
* Metadata
* Standard Libraries

Implementations|

| Microsoft|

* .NET
* .NET Framework
* .NET Compact Framework
* .NET Micro Framework

|

Other|

* Mono
* DotGNU

Languages|

| Major|

* C#
* Visual Basic
* F#
* PowerShell

|

Other|

* Axum
* A#
* Boo
* Clojure
* Cobra
* C++/CLI
* IronScheme
* IronPython
* IronRuby
* JScript .NET
* J#
* Nemerle
* Oxygene
* Phalanger
* Q#
* Scala
* Small Basic

Comparison|

* C# and Java
* C# and Visual Basic .NET
* Visual Basic and Visual Basic .NET

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template