Mind

Totality of psychological phenomena

For other uses, see Mind (disambiguation).

The mind is responsible for phenomena like perception, thought, feeling, and action.

The mind is that which thinks, feels, perceives, imagines, remembers, and wills. The totality of mental phenomena, it includes both conscious processes, through which an individual is aware of external and internal circumstances, and unconscious processes, which can influence an individual without intention or awareness. Traditionally, minds were often conceived as separate entities that can exist on their own but are more commonly understood as capacities of material brains in the contemporary discourse. The mind plays a central role in most aspects of human life but its exact nature is disputed. Some characterizations focus on internal aspects, saying that the mind is private and transforms information. Others stress its relation to outward conduct, understanding mental phenomena as dispositions to engage in observable behavior.

The mind–body problem is the challenge of explaining the relation between matter and mind. The dominant position today is physicalism, which says that everything is material, meaning that minds are certain aspects or features of some material objects. The evolutionary history of the mind is tied to the development of the nervous system, which led to the formation of brains. As brains became more complex, the number and capacity of mental functions increased with particular brain areas dedicated to specific mental functions. Individual human minds also develop as they learn from experience and pass through psychological stages in the process of aging. Some people are affected by mental disorders, for which certain mental capacities do not function as they should.

It is widely accepted that non-human animals have some form of mind, but it is controversial to which animals this applies. The topic of artificial minds poses similar challenges, with theorists discussing the possibility and consequences of creating them using computers.

The main fields of inquiry studying the mind include psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and philosophy. They tend to focus on different aspects of the mind and employ different methods of investigation, ranging from empirical observation and neuroimaging to conceptual analysis and thought experiments. The mind is relevant to many other fields, including epistemology, anthropology, religion, and education.

## Definition

[edit]

The mind is the totality of psychological phenomena and capacities, encompassing consciousness, thought, perception, feeling, mood, motivation, behavior, memory, and learning.[1] The term is sometimes used in a more narrow sense to refer only to higher or more abstract cognitive functions associated with reasoning and awareness.[2] Minds were traditionally conceived as immaterial substances or independent entities and contrasted with matter and body. In the contemporary discourse, they are more commonly seen as features of other entities and are often understood as capacities of material brains.[3] The precise definition of mind is disputed and while it is generally accepted that some non-human animals also have mind, there is no agreement on where exactly the boundary lies.[4] Despite these disputes, there is wide agreement that mind plays a central role in most aspects of human life as the seat of consciousness, emotions, thoughts, and sense of personal identity.[5] Various fields of inquiry study the mind; the main ones include psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience, and philosophy.[6]

The words psyche and mentality are usually used as synonyms of mind.[7] They are often employed in overlapping ways with the terms soul, spirit, cognition, intellect, intelligence, and brain but their meanings are not exactly the same. Some religions understand the soul as an independent entity that constitutes the immaterial essence of human beings, is of divine origin, survives bodily death, and is immortal.[8] The word spirit has various additional meanings not directly associated with mind, such as a vital principle animating living beings or a supernatural being inhabiting objects or places.[9] Cognition encompasses certain types of mental processes in which knowledge is acquired and information processed.[10] The intellect is one mental capacity responsible for thought, reasoning, and understanding[11] and is closely related to intelligence as the ability to acquire, understand, and apply knowledge.[12] The brain is the physical organ responsible for most or all mental functions.[13]

The modern English word mind originates from the Old English word gemynd, meaning "memory". This term gave rise to the Middle English words mind(e), münd(e), and mend(e), resulting in a slow expansion of meaning to cover all mental capacities. The original meaning is preserved in expressions like call to mind and keep in mind. Cognates include the Old High German gimunt, the Gothic gamunds, the ancient Greek μένος, the Latin mens, and the Sanskrit manas.[14]

## Forms

[edit]

The mind encompasses many phenomena, including perception, memory, thought, imagination, motivation, emotion, attention, learning, and consciousness.[15] Perception is the process of interpreting and organizing sensory information to become acquainted with the environment. This information is acquired through sense organs receptive to various types of physical stimuli, which correspond to different forms of perception, such as vision, hearing, touch, smell, and taste. The sensory information received this way is a form of raw data that is filtered and processed to actively construct a representation of the world and the objects within it. This complex process underlying perceptual experience is shaped by many factors, including the individual's past experiences, cultural background, beliefs, knowledge, and expectations.[16]

Memory is the mechanism of storing and retrieving information.[17] Episodic memory handles information about specific past events in one's life and makes this information available in the present. When a person remembers what they had for dinner yesterday, they employ episodic memory. Semantic memory handles general knowledge about the world that is not tied to any specific episodes. When a person recalls that the capital of Japan is Tokyo, they usually access this general information without recalling the specific instance when they learned it. Procedural memory is memory of how to do things, such as riding a bicycle or playing a musical instrument.[18] Another distinction is between short-term memory, which holds information for brief periods, usually with the purpose of completing specific cognitive tasks, and long-term memory, which can store information indefinitely.[19]

Thinking involves the processing of information and the manipulation of concepts and ideas. It is a goal-oriented activity that often happens in response to experiences as a symbolic process aimed at making sense of them, organizing their information, and deciding how to respond.[20] Logical reasoning is a form of thinking that starts from a set of premises and aims to arrive at a conclusion supported by these premises. This is the case when deducing that "Socrates is mortal" from the premises "Socrates is a man" and "all men are mortal".[21] Problem-solving is a closely related process that consists of several steps, such as identifying a problem, developing a plan to address it, implementing the plan, and assessing whether it worked.[22] Thinking in the form of decision-making involves considering possible courses of action to assess which one is the most beneficial.[23] As a symbolic process, thinking is deeply intertwined with language and some theorists hold that all thought happens through the medium of language.[24]

Imagination is a creative process of internally generating mental images. Unlike perception, it does not directly depend on the stimulation of sensory organs. Similar to dreaming, these images are often derived from previous experiences but can include novel combinations and elements. Imagination happens during daydreaming and plays a key role in art and literature but can also be used to come up with novel solutions to real-world problems.[25]

Motivation is an internal state that propels individuals to initiate, continue, or terminate goal-directed behavior. It is responsible for the formation of intentions to perform actions and affects what goals someone pursues, how much effort they invest in the activity, and how long they engage in it.[26] Motivation is affected by emotions, which are temporary experiences of positive or negative feelings like joy or anger. They are directed at and evaluate specific events, persons, or situations. They usually come together with certain physiological and behavioral responses.[27]

Attention is an aspect of other mental processes in which mental resources like awareness are directed towards certain features of experience and away from others. This happens when a driver focuses on the traffic while ignoring billboards on the side of the road. Attention can be controlled voluntarily in the pursuit of specific goals but can also occur involuntarily when a strong stimulus captures a person's attention.[28] Attention is relevant to learning, which is the ability of the mind to acquire new information and permanently modify its understanding and behavioral patterns. Individuals learn by undergoing experiences, which helps them adapt to the environment.[29]

### Conscious and unconscious

[edit]

Main articles: Consciousness and Unconscious mind

An influential distinction is between conscious and unconscious mental processes. Consciousness is the awareness of external and internal circumstances. It encompasses a wide variety of states, such as perception, thinking, fantasizing, dreaming, and altered states of consciousness.[30] In the case of phenomenal consciousness, the awareness involves a direct and qualitative experience of mental phenomena, like the auditory experience of attending a concert. Access consciousness, by contrast, refers to an awareness of information that is accessible to other mental processes but not necessarily part of current experience. For example, the information stored in a memory may be accessible when drawing conclusions or guiding actions even when the person is not explicitly thinking about it.[31]

Unconscious or nonconscious mental processes operate without the individual's awareness but can still influence mental phenomena on the level of thought, feeling, and action. Some theorists distinguish between preconscious, subconscious, and unconscious states depending on their accessibility to conscious awareness.[32] When applied to the overall state of a person rather than specific processes, the term unconscious implies that the person lacks any awareness of their environment and themselves, like during a coma.[33] The unconscious mind plays a central role in psychoanalysis as the part of the mind that contains thoughts, memories, and desires not accessible to conscious introspection. According to Sigmund Freud, the psychological mechanism of repression keeps disturbing phenomena, like unacceptable sexual and aggressive impulses, from entering consciousness to protect the individual. Psychoanalytic theory studies symptoms caused by this process and therapeutic methods to avoid them by making the repressed thoughts accessible to conscious awareness.[34]

### Other distinctions

[edit]

Mental states are often divided into sensory and propositional states. Sensory states are experiences of sensory qualities, often referred to as qualia, like colors, sounds, smells, pains, itches, and hunger. Propositional states involve an attitude towards a content that can be expressed by a declarative sentence. When a person believes that it is raining, they have the propositional attitude of belief towards the content "it is raining". Different types of propositional states are characterized by different attitudes towards their content. For instance, it is also possible to hope, fear, desire, or doubt that it is raining.[35]

A mental state or process is rational if it is based on good reasons or follows the norms of rationality. For example, a belief is rational if it relies on strong supporting evidence and a decision is rational if it follows careful deliberation of all the relevant factors and outcomes. Mental states are irrational if they are not based on good reasons, such as beliefs caused by faulty reasoning, superstition, or cognitive biases, and decisions that give into temptations instead of following one's best judgment.[36] Mental states that fall outside the domain of rational evaluation are arational rather than irrational. There is controversy regarding which mental phenomena lie outside this domain; suggested examples include sensory impressions, feelings, desires, and involuntary responses.[37]

Another contrast is between dispositional and occurrent mental states. A dispositional state is a power that is not exercised. If a person believes that cats have whiskers but does not think about this fact, it is a dispositional belief. By activating the belief to consciously think about it or use it in other cognitive processes, it becomes occurrent until it is no longer actively considered or used. The great majority of a person's beliefs are dispositional most of the time.[38]

### Faculties and modules

[edit]

Traditionally, the mind was subdivided into mental faculties understood as capacities to perform certain functions or bring about certain processes.[39] An influential subdivision in the history of philosophy was between the faculties of intellect and will.[40] The intellect encompasses mental phenomena aimed at understanding the world and determining what to believe or what is true; the will is concerned with practical matters and what is good, reflected in phenomena like desire, decision-making, and action.[41] The exact number and nature of the mental faculties are disputed and more fine-grained subdivisions have been proposed, such as dividing the intellect into the faculties of understanding and judgment or adding sensibility as an additional faculty responsible for sensory impressions.[42][a]

In the Müller-Lyer illusion, the horizontal black lines have the same length but the top line appears longer. The illusion persists even after becoming aware of it because of the automatic functioning of mental modules responsible for low-level visual processing.[44]

In contrast to the traditional view, more recent approaches analyze the mind in terms of mental modules rather than faculties.[45] A mental module is an inborn system of the brain that automatically performs a particular function within a specific domain without conscious awareness or effort. In contrast to faculties, the concept of mental modules is normally used to provide a more limited explanation restricted to certain low-level cognitive processes without trying to explain how they are integrated into higher-level processes such as conscious reasoning.[46][b] Many low-level cognitive processes responsible for visual perception have this automatic and unconscious nature. In the case of visual illusions like the Müller-Lyer illusion, the underlying processes continue their operation and the illusion persists even after a person has become aware of the illusion, indicating the mechanical and involuntary nature of the process.[48] Other examples of mental modules concern cognitive processes responsible for language processing and facial recognition.[49]

## Theories of the nature of mind

[edit]

Theories of the nature of mind aim to determine what all mental states have in common. They seek to discover the "mark of the mental", that is, the criteria that distinguish mental from non-mental phenomena.[50] Epistemic criteria say that the unique feature of mental states is how people know about them. For example, if a person has a toothache, they have direct or non-inferential knowledge that they are in pain. But they do not have this kind of knowledge of the physical causes of the pain and may have to consult external evidence through visual inspection or a visit to the dentist. Another feature commonly ascribed to mental states is that they are private, meaning that others do not have this kind of direct access to a person's mental state and have to infer it from other observations, like the pain behavior of the person with the toothache. Some philosophers claim that knowledge of some or all mental states is infallible, for instance, that a person cannot be mistaken about whether they are in pain.[51]

A related view states that all mental states are either conscious or accessible to consciousness. According to this view, when a person actively remembers the fact that the Eiffel Tower is in Paris then this state is mental because it is part of consciousness; when the person does not think about it, this belief is still a mental state because the person could bring it to consciousness by thinking about it. This view denies the existence of a "deep unconsciousness", that is, unconscious mental states that cannot in principle become conscious.[52]

Another theory says that intentionality[c] is the mark of the mental. A state is intentional if it refers to or represents something. For example, if a person perceives a piano or thinks about it then the mental state is intentional because it refers to a piano. This view distinguishes between original and derivative intentionality. Mental states have original intentionality while some non-mental phenomena have derivative intentionality. For instance, the word piano and a picture of a piano are intentional in a derivative sense: they do not directly refer to a piano but if a person looks at them, they may evoke in this person a mental state that refers to a piano. Philosophers who disagree that all mental states are intentional cite examples such as itches, tickles, and pains as possible exceptions.[54]

According to behaviorism, mental states are dispositions to engage in certain publicly observable behavior as a reaction to particular external stimuli. This view implies that mental phenomena are not private internal states but are accessible to empirical observation like regular physical phenomena.[55] Functionalism agrees that mental states do not depend on the exact internal constitution of the mind and characterizes them instead in regard to their functional role. Unlike behaviorism, this role is not limited to behavioral patterns but includes other factors as well. For example, part of the functional role of pain is given by its relation to bodily injury and its tendency to cause behavioral patterns like moaning and other mental states, like a desire to stop the pain.[56] Computationalism, a similar theory prominent in cognitive science, defines minds in terms of cognitions and computations as information processors.[57]

Theories under the umbrella of externalism emphasize the mind's dependency on the environment. According to this view, mental states and their contents are at least partially determined by external circumstances.[58] For example, some forms of content externalism hold that it can depend on external circumstances whether a belief refers to one object or another.[59] The extended mind thesis states that external circumstances not only affect the mind but are part of it, like a diary or a calculator extend the mind's capacity to store and process information.[60] The closely related view of enactivism holds that mental processes involve an interaction between organism and environment.[61]

## Relation to matter

[edit]

### Mind–body problem

[edit]

Main article: Mind–body problem

Different approaches toward resolving the mind–body problem

The mind–body problem is the difficulty of providing a general explanation of the relationship between mind and body, for example, of the link between thoughts and brain processes. Despite their different characteristics, mind and body interact with each other, like when a bodily change causes mental discomfort or when a limb moves because of an intention.[62] According to substance dualism, minds or souls exist as distinct substances that have mental states while material things are another type of substance. This view implies that, at least in principle, minds can exist without bodies.[63] Property dualism is another view, saying that mind and matter are not distinct individuals but different properties that apply to the same individual.[64] Monist views, by contrast, state that reality is made up of only one kind. According to idealists, everything is mental.[65] They understand material things as mental constructs, for example, as ideas or perceptions.[66] According to neutral monists, the world is at its most fundamental level neither physical nor mental but neutral. They see physical and mental concepts as convenient but superficial ways to describe reality.[67]

The monist view most influential in contemporary philosophy is physicalism, also referred to as materialism,[d] which states that everything is physical.[69] According to eliminative physicalism, there are no mental phenomena, meaning that things like beliefs and desires do not form part of reality.[70] Reductive physicalists defend a less radical position: they say that mental states exist but can, at least in principle, be completely described by physics without the need for special sciences like psychology. For example, behaviorists aim to analyze mental concepts in terms of observable behavior without resorting to internal mental states.[71] Type identity theory also belongs to reductive physicalism and says that mental states are the same as brain states.[72] While non-reductive physicalists agree that everything is physical, they say that mental concepts describe physical reality on a more abstract level that cannot be achieved by physics.[73] According to functionalism, mental concepts do not describe the internal constitution of physical substances but functional roles within a system.[74] One consequence of this view is that mind does not depend on brains but can also be realized by other systems that implement the corresponding functional roles, possibly also computers.[75]

The hard problem of consciousness is a central aspect of the mind–body problem: it is the challenge of explaining how physical states can give rise to conscious experience. Its main difficulty lies in the subjective and qualitative nature of consciousness, which is unlike typical physical processes. The hard problem of consciousness contrasts with the "easy problems" of explaining how certain aspects of consciousness function, such as perception, memory, or learning.[76]

### Brain areas and processes

[edit]

Another approach to the relation between mind and matter uses empirical observation to study how the brain works and which brain areas and processes are associated with specific mental phenomena.[77] The brain is the central organ of the nervous system and is present in all vertebrates and the majority of invertebrates. The human brain is of particular complexity and consists of about 86 billion neurons, which communicate with one another via synapses.[78] They form a complex neural network and cognitive processes emerge from their electrical and chemical interactions.[79] The human brain is divided into regions that are associated with different functions. The main regions are the hindbrain, midbrain, and forebrain.[80] The hindbrain and the midbrain are responsible for many biological functions associated with basic survival while higher mental functions, ranging from thoughts to motivation, are primarily localized in the forebrain.[81]

The cerebral cortex is divided into various areas with distinct functions, like the prefrontal cortex (shown in orange) responsible for executive functions.

The primary operation of many of the main mental phenomena is located in specific areas of the forebrain. The prefrontal cortex is responsible for executive functions, such as planning, decision-making, problem-solving, and working memory.[82] The role of the sensory cortex is to process and interpret sensory information, with different subareas dedicated to different senses, like the visual and the auditory areas. A central function of the hippocampus is the formation and retrieval of long-term memories. It belongs to the limbic system, which plays a key role in the regulation of emotions through the amygdala. The motor cortex is responsible for planning, executing, and controlling voluntary movements. Broca's area is a separate region dedicated to speech production.[83] The activity of the different areas is additionally influenced by neurotransmitters, which are signaling molecules that enhance or inhibit different types of neural communication. For example, dopamine influences motivation and pleasure while serotonin affects mood and appetite.[84]

The close interrelation of brain processes and the mind is seen by the effect that physical changes of the brain have on the mind. For instance, the consumption of psychoactive drugs, like caffeine, antidepressants, alcohol, and psychedelics, temporarily affects brain chemistry with diverse effects on the mind, ranging from increased attention to mood changes, impaired cognitive functions, and hallucinations.[85] Long-term changes to the brain in the form of neurodegenerative diseases and brain injuries can lead to permanent alterations in mental functions. Alzheimer's disease in its first stage deteriorates the hippocampus, reducing the ability to form new memories and recall existing ones.[86] An often-cited case of the effects of brain injury is Phineas Gage, whose prefrontal cortex was severely damaged during a work accident when an iron rod pierced through his skull and brain. Gage survived the accident but his personality and social attitude changed significantly as he became more impulsive, irritable, and anti-social while showing little regard for social conventions and an impaired ability to plan and make rational decisions.[87] Not all these changes were permanent and Gage managed to recover and adapt in some areas.[88]

## Development

[edit]

### Evolution

[edit]

The mind has a long evolutionary history starting with the development of the nervous system and the brain.[89] While it is generally accepted today that mind is not exclusive to humans and various non-human animals have some form of mind, there is no consensus at which point exactly the mind emerged.[90] The evolution of mind is usually explained in terms of natural selection: genetic variations responsible for new or improved mental capacities, like better perception or social dispositions, have an increased chance of being passed on to future generations if they are beneficial to survival and reproduction.[91]

Minimal forms of information processing are already found in the earliest forms of life 4 to 3.5 billion years ago, like the abilities of bacteria and eukaryotic unicellular organisms to sense the environment, store this information, and react to it. Nerve cells emerged with the development of multicellular organisms more than 600 million years ago as a way to process and transmit information. About 600 to 550 million years ago, an evolutionary bifurcation happened into radially symmetric organisms[e] with ring-shaped nervous systems or a nerve net, like jellyfish, and organisms with bilaterally symmetric bodies, whose nervous systems tend to be more centralized. About 540 million years ago, vertebrates evolved within the group of bilaterally organized organisms. All vertebrates, like birds and mammals, have a central nervous system including a complex brain with specialized functions while invertebrates, like clams and insects, either have no brains or tend to have simple brains.[93] With the evolution of vertebrates, their brains tended to grow and the specialization of the different brain areas tended to increase. These developments are closely related to changes in limb structures, sense organs, and living conditions with a close correspondence between the size of a brain area and the importance of its function to the organism.[94] An important step in the evolution of mammals about 200 million years ago was the development of the neocortex, which is responsible for many higher-order brain functions.[95]

The size of the brain relative to the body further increased with the development of primates, like monkeys, about 65 million years ago and later with the emergence of the first hominins about 7–5 million years ago.[96] Anatomically modern humans appeared about 300,000 to 200,000 years ago.[97] Various theories of the evolutionary processes responsible for human intelligence have been proposed. The social intelligence hypothesis says that the evolution of the human mind was triggered by the increased importance of social life and its emphasis on mental abilities associated with empathy, knowledge transfer, and meta-cognition. According to the ecological intelligence hypothesis, the main value of the increased mental capacities comes from their advantages in dealing with a complex physical environment through processes like behavioral flexibility, learning, and tool use. Other suggested mechanisms include the effects of a changed diet with energy-rich food and general benefits from an increased speed and efficiency of information processing.[98]

### Individual

[edit]

Besides the development of mind in general in the course of history, there is also the development of individual human minds. Some of the individual changes vary from person to person as a form of learning from experience, like forming specific memories or acquiring particular behavioral patterns. Others are more universal developments as psychological stages that all or most humans go through as they pass through early childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age.[99] These developments cover various areas, including intellectual, sensorimotor, linguistic, emotional, social, and moral developments.[100] Some factors affect the development of mind before birth, such as nutrition, maternal stress, and exposure to harmful substances like alcohol during pregnancy.[101]

Early childhood is marked by rapid developments as infants learn voluntary control over their bodies and interact with their environment on a basic level. Typically after about one year, this covers abilities like walking, recognizing familiar faces, and producing individual words.[102] On the emotional and social levels, they develop attachments with their primary caretakers and express emotions ranging from joy to anger, fear, and surprise.[103] An influential theory by Jean Piaget divides the cognitive development of children into four stages. The sensorimotor stage from birth until two years is concerned with sensory impressions and motor activities while learning that objects remain in existence even when not observed. In the preoperational stage until seven years, children learn to interpret and use symbols in an intuitive manner. They start employing logical reasoning to physical objects in the concrete operational stage until eleven years and extend this capacity in the following formal operational stage to abstract ideas as well as probabilities and possibilities.[104] Other important processes shaping the mind in this period are socialization and enculturation, at first through primary caretakers and later through peers and the schooling system.[105]

Psychological changes during adolescence are provoked both by physiological changes and being confronted with a different social situation and new expectations from others. An important factor in this period is change to the self-concept, which can take the form of an identity crisis. This process often involves developing individuality and independence from parents while at the same time seeking closeness and conformity with friends and peers. Further developments in this period include improvements to the reasoning ability and the formation of a principled moral viewpoint.[106]

The mind also changes during adulthood but in a less rapid and pronounced manner. Reasoning and problem-solving skills improve during early and middle adulthood. Some people experience the mid-life transition as a midlife crisis involving an inner conflict about personal identity, often associated with anxiety, a sense of lack of accomplishments in life, and an awareness of mortality. Intellectual faculties tend to decline in later adulthood, specifically the ability to learn complex unfamiliar tasks and later also the ability to remember, while people tend to become more inward-looking and cautious.[107]

## Non-human

[edit]

### Animal

[edit]

It is commonly acknowledged today that animals have some form of mind, but it is controversial to which animals this applies and how their mind differs from the human mind.[108] Different conceptions of the mind lead to different responses to this problem; when understood in a very wide sense as the capacity to process information, the mind is present in all forms of life, including insects, plants, and individual cells;[109] on the other side of the spectrum are views that deny the existence of mentality in most or all non-human animals based on the idea that they lack key mental capacities, like abstract rationality and symbolic language.[110] The status of animal minds is highly relevant to the field of ethics since it affects the treatment of animals, including the topic of animal rights.[111]

Discontinuity views state that the minds of non-human animals are fundamentally different from human minds and often point to higher mental faculties, like thinking, reasoning, and decision-making based on beliefs and desires.[112] This outlook is reflected in the traditionally influential position of defining humans as "rational animals" as opposed to all other animals.[113] Continuity views, by contrast, emphasize similarities and see the increased human mental capacities as a matter of degree rather than kind. Central considerations for this position are the shared evolutionary origin, organic similarities on the level of brain and nervous system, and observable behavior, ranging from problem-solving skills, animal communication, and reactions to and expressions of pain and pleasure. Of particular importance are the questions of consciousness and sentience, that is, to what extent non-human animals have a subjective experience of the world and are capable of suffering and feeling joy.[114]

### Artificial

[edit]

Main article: Philosophy of artificial intelligence

The Turing test aims to determine whether a computer can imitate human linguistic behavior to the degree that it is not possible to tell the difference between human and computer.

Some of the difficulties of assessing animal minds are also reflected in the topic of artificial minds, that is, the question of whether computer systems implementing artificial intelligence should be considered a form of mind.[115] This idea is consistent with some theories of the nature of mind, such as functionalism and its idea that mental concepts describe functional roles, which are implemented by biological brains but could in principle also be implemented by artificial devices.[116] The Turing test is a traditionally influential procedure to test artificial intelligence: a person exchanges messages with two parties, one of them a human and the other a computer. The computer passes the test if it is not possible to reliably tell which party is the human and which one is the computer. While there are computer programs today that may pass the Turing test, this alone is usually not accepted as conclusive proof of mindedness.[117] For some aspects of mind, it is controversial whether computers can, in principle, implement them, such as desires, feelings, consciousness, and free will.[118]

This problem is often discussed through the contrast between weak and strong artificial intelligence. Weak or narrow artificial intelligence is limited to specific mental capacities or functions. It focuses on a particular task or a narrow set of tasks, like autonomous driving, speech recognition, or theorem proving. The goal of strong AI, also termed artificial general intelligence, is to create a complete artificial person that has all the mental capacities of humans, including consciousness, emotion, and reason.[119] It is controversial whether strong AI is possible; influential arguments against it include John Searle's Chinese Room Argument and Hubert Dreyfus's critique based on Heideggerian philosophy.[120]

## Mental health and disorder

[edit]

Main articles: Mental health, Mental disorder, and Psychopathology

Mental health is a state of mind characterized by internal equilibrium and well-being in which mental capacities function as they should. Some theorists emphasize positive features such as the abilities of a person to realize their potential, express and modulate emotions, cope with adverse life situations, and fulfill their social role. Negative definitions, by contrast, see mental health as the absence of mental illness in the form of mental disorders.[121] Mental disorders are abnormal patterns of thought, emotion, or behavior that deviate not only from how a mental capacity works on average but from the norm of how it should work while usually causing some form of distress. The content of those norms is controversial and there are differences from culture to culture; for example, homosexuality was historically considered a mental disorder by medical professionals, a view which only changed in the second half of 20th century.[122]

Obsessive–compulsive disorder is a mental disorder in which a person follows compulsive rituals, like excessive hand washing, to alleviate anxiety caused by intrusive thoughts.

There is a great variety of mental disorders, each associated with a different form of malfunctioning. Anxiety disorders involve intense and persistent fear that is disproportionate to the actual threat and significantly impairs everyday life, like social phobias, which involve irrational fear of certain social situations. Anxiety disorders also include obsessive–compulsive disorder, for which the anxiety manifests in the form of intrusive thoughts that the person tries to alleviate by following compulsive rituals.[123] Mood disorders cause intensive moods or mood swings that are inconsistent with the external circumstances and can last for extensive periods. For instance, people affected by bipolar disorder experience extreme mood swings between manic states of euphoria and depressive states of hopelessness.[124] Personality disorders are characterized by enduring patterns of maladaptive behavior that significantly impair regular life, like paranoid personality disorder, which leads people to be deeply suspicious of the motives of others without rational basis.[125] Psychotic disorders are among the most severe mental illnesses and involve a distorted relation to reality in the form of hallucinations and delusions, as seen in schizophrenia.[126] Other disorders include dissociative disorders and eating disorders.[127]

The biopsychosocial model identifies three types of causes of mental disorders: biological, cognitive, and environmental factors. Biological factors include bodily causes, in particular neurological influences and genetic predispositions. On the cognitive level, maladaptive beliefs and patterns of thought can be responsible. Environmental factors involve cultural influences and social events that may trigger the onset of a disorder.[128] There are various approaches to treating mental disorders, and the most suitable treatment usually depends on the type of disorder, its cause, and the individual's overall condition. Psychotherapeutic methods use personal interaction with a therapist to change patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting.[129] Psychoanalysis aims to help patients resolve conflicts between the conscious and the unconscious mind.[130] Cognitive behavioral therapy focuses on conscious mental phenomena to identify and change irrational beliefs and negative thought patterns.[131] Behavior therapy, a related approach, relies on classical conditioning to unlearn harmful behaviors.[132] Humanistic therapies try to help people gain insight into their self-worth and empower them to resolve their problems.[133] Drug therapies use medication to alter the brain chemistry involved in the disorder through substances like antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and anxiolytics.[134]

## Fields and methods of inquiry

[edit]

Various fields of inquiry study the mind, including psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and cognitive science. They differ from each other in the aspects of mind they investigate and the methods they employ in the process.[135] The study of the mind poses various problems since it is difficult to directly examine, manipulate, and measure it. Trying to circumvent this problem by investigating the brain comes with new challenges of its own, mainly because of the brain's complexity as a neural network consisting of billions of neurons, each with up to 10,000 links to other neurons.[136]

### Psychology

[edit]

Main article: Psychology

Psychology is the scientific study of mind and behavior. It investigates conscious and unconscious mental phenomena, including perception, memory, feeling, thought, decision, intelligence, and personality. It is further interested in their outward manifestation in the form of observable behavioral patterns and how these patterns depend on external circumstances and are shaped by learning.[137] Psychology is a wide discipline that includes many subfields. Cognitive psychology is interested in higher-order mental activities like thinking, problem-solving, reasoning, and concept formation.[138] Biological psychology seeks to understand the underlying mechanisms on the physiological level and how they depend on genetic transmission and the environment.[139] Developmental psychology studies the development of the mind from childhood to old age while social psychology examines the influence of social contexts on mind and behavior.[140] Personality psychology investigates personality, exploring how characteristic patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior develop and vary among individuals.[141] Further subfields include comparative, clinical, educational, occupational, and neuropsychology.[142]

Psychologists use a great variety of methods to study the mind. Experimental approaches set up a controlled situation, either in the laboratory or the field, in which they modify independent variables and measure their effects on dependent variables. This approach makes it possible to identify causal relations between the variables. For example, to determine whether people with similar interests (independent variable) are more likely to become friends (dependent variables), participants of a study could be paired with either similar or dissimilar participants. After giving the pairs time to interact, it is assessed whether the members of similar pairs have more positive attitudes toward one another than the members of dissimilar pairs.[143]

Correlational methods examine the strength of association between two variables without establishing a causal relationship between them.[144] The survey method presents participants with a list of questions aimed at eliciting information about their mental attitudes, behavior, and other relevant factors. It analyzes how participants respond to questions and how answers to different questions correlate with one another.[145] Surveys usually have a large number of participants in contrast to case studies, which focus on an in-depth examination of a single subject or a small group of subjects, often to examine rare phenomena or explore new fields.[146] Further methods include longitudinal studies, naturalistic observation, and phenomenological description of experience.[147]

### Neuroscience

[edit]

Main article: Neuroscience

Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a neuroimaging technique to detect brain areas with increased neural activity (shown in orange).

Neuroscience is the study of the nervous system. Its primary focus is the central nervous system and the brain in particular, but it also investigates the peripheral nervous system mainly responsible for connecting the central nervous system to the limbs and organs. Neuroscience examines the implementation of mental phenomena on a physiological basis. It covers various levels of analysis; on the small scale, it studies the molecular and cellular basis of the mind, dealing with the constitution of and interaction between individual neurons; on the large scale, it analyzes the architecture of the brain as a whole and its division into regions with different functions.[148]

Neuroimaging techniques are of particular importance as the main research methods of neuroscientists. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures changes in the magnetic field of the brain associated with blood flow. Areas of increased blood flow indicate that the corresponding brain region is particularly active. Positron emission tomography (PET) uses radioactive substances to detect a range of metabolic changes in the brain. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures the electrical activity of the brain, usually by placing electrodes on the scalp and measuring the voltage differences between them. These techniques are often employed to measure brain changes under particular circumstances, for example, while engaged in a specific cognitive task. Important insights are also gained from patients and laboratory animals with brain damage in particular areas to assess the function of the damaged area and how its absence affects the remaining brain.[149]

### Philosophy of mind

[edit]

Main article: Philosophy of mind

Philosophy of mind examines the nature of mental phenomena and their relation to the physical world. It seeks to understand the "mark of the mental", that is, the features that all mental states have in common. It further investigates the essence of different types of mental phenomena, such as beliefs, desires, emotions, intentionality, and consciousness while exploring how they are related to one another. Philosophy of mind also examines solutions to the mind–body problem, like dualism, idealism, and physicalism, and assesses arguments for and against them.[150] It asks whether people have a free will or the ability to choose their actions, and how this ability contrasts with the idea that everthing is determined by preceding causes.[151]

Philosophers use thought experiments to explore the nature of the mind and its relation to matter, for example, by imagining how a brain in a vat would experience reality if a supercomputer fed it the same electrical stimulation a normal brain receives.

While philosophers of mind also include empirical considerations in their inquiry, they differ from fields like psychology and neuroscience by giving significantly more emphasis to non-empirical forms of inquiry. One such method is conceptual analysis, which aims to clarify the meaning of concepts, like mind and intention, by decomposing them to identify their semantic parts.[152] Thought experiments are often used to evoke intuitions about abstract theories to assess their coherence and plausibility: philosophers imagine a situation relevant to a theory and employ counterfactual thinking to assess the possible consequences of this theory, as in Mary the color scientist, philosophical zombies, and brain in a vat-scenarios.[153] Because of the subjective nature of the mind, the phenomenological method is also commonly used to analyze the structure of consciousness by describing experience from the first-person perspective.[154]

### Cognitive science

[edit]

Main article: Cognitive science

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary study of mental processes. It aims to overcome the challenge of understanding something as complex as the mind by integrating research from diverse fields ranging from psychology and neuroscience to philosophy, linguistics, and artificial intelligence. Unlike these disciplines, it is not a unified field but a collaborative effort. One difficulty in synthesizing their insights is that each of these disciplines explores the mind from a different perspective and level of abstraction while using different research methods to arrive at its conclusion.[155]

Cognitive science aims to overcome this difficulty by relying on a unified conceptualization of minds as information processors. This means that mental processes are understood as computations that retrieve, transform, store, and transmit information.[155] For example, perception retrieves sensory information from the environment and transforms it to extract meaningful patterns that can be used in other mental processes, such as planning and decision-making.[156] Cognitive science relies on different levels of description to analyze cognitive processes; the most abstract level focuses on the basic problem the process is supposed to solve and the reasons why the organism needs to solve it; the intermediate level seeks to uncover the algorithm as a formal step-by-step procedure to solve the problem; the most concrete level asks how the algorithm is implemented through physiological changes on the level of the brain.[157] Another methodology to deal with the complexity of the mind is to analyze the mind as a complex system composed of individual subsystems that can be studied independently of one another.[158]

## Relation to other fields

[edit]

The mind is relevant to many fields. In epistemology, the problem of other minds is the challenge of explaining how it is possible to know that people other than oneself have a mind. The difficulty arises from the fact that people directly experience their own minds but do not have the same access to the minds of others. According to a common view, it is necessary to rely on perception to observe the behavior of others and then infer that they have a mind based on analogical or abductive reasoning.[159] Closely related to this problem is theory of mind in psychology, which is the ability to understand that other people possess beliefs, desires, intentions, and feelings that may differ from one's own.[160]

Anthropology is interested in how different cultures conceptualize the nature of mind and its relation to the world. These conceptualizations affect the way people understand themselves, experience illness, and interpret ritualistic practices as attempts to commune with spirits. Some cultures do not draw a strict boundary between mind and world by allowing that thoughts can pass directly into the world and manifest as beneficial or harmful forces. Others strictly separate the mind as an internal phenomenon without supernatural powers from external reality.[161] Sociology is a related field concerned with the connections between mind, society, and behavior.[162]

The concept of mind plays a central role in various religions. Buddhists say that there is no enduring self underlying mental activity and analyze the mind as a stream of constantly changing experiences characterized by five aspects or "aggregates": material form, feelings, perception, volition, and consciousness.[163] Hindus, by contrast, affirm the existence of a permanent self. In an influential analogy, the human mind is compared to a horse-drawn chariot: the horses are the senses, which lure the sense mind corresponding to the reins through sensual pleasures but are controlled by the charioteer embodying the intellect while the self is a passenger.[164] In traditional Christian philosophy, mind and soul are closely intertwined as the immaterial aspect of humans that may survive bodily death.[165] Islamic thought distinguishes between the mind, spirit, heart, and self as interconnected aspects of the spiritual dimension of humans.[166] Daoism and Confucianism use the concept of heart-mind as the center of cognitive and emotional life, encompassing thought, understanding, will, desire, and mood.[167]

In the field of education, the minds of students are shaped through the transmission of knowledge, skills, and character traits as a process of socialization and enculturation. This is achieved through different teaching methods including the contrast between group work and individual learning and the use of instructional media.[168] Teacher-centered education positions the teacher as the central authority controlling the learning process whereas in student-centered education, students have a more active role in shaping classroom activities.[169] The choice of the most effective method to develop the minds of the learners is determined by various factors, including the topic and the learner's age and skill level.[170]

Phrenology was a pseudoscientific attempt to correlate mental functions to brain areas.

The mind is a frequent subject of pseudoscientific inquiry. Phrenology was an early attempt to correlate mental functions with specific brain areas. While its central claims about predicting mental traits by measuring bumps on the skull did not survive scientific scrutiny, the underlying idea that certain mental functions are localized in particular regions of the brain is now widely accepted.[171] Parapsychologists seek to discover and study paranormal mental abilities ranging from clairvoyance to telepathy and telekinesis.[172]

## See also

[edit]

* Conscience
* Embodied cognition
* Explanatory gap
* Ideasthesia
* Mental energy
* Mind at Large
* Neural Darwinism
* Outline of human intelligence
* Outline of thought
* Subjective character of experience

## References

[edit]

### Notes

[edit]

1. ^ Mental faculties also play a central role in the Indian tradition, such as the contrast between the sense mind (manas) and intellect (buddhi).[43]
2. ^ A different perspective is proposed by the massive modularity hypothesis, which states that the mind is entirely composed of modules with high-level modules establishing the connection between low-level modules.[47]
3. ^ Intentionality is to be distinguished from intention in the sense of having a plan to perform a certain action.[53]
4. ^ The two terms are usually treated as synonyms but some theorists distinguish them by holding that materialism is restricted to matter while physicalism is a wider term that includes additional physical phenomena, like forces.[68]
5. ^ They include cnidarians and ctenophorans.[92]

### Citations

[edit]

1. ^

* Kim 2011, pp. 2, 6
* American Psychological Association 2018i
* HarperCollins 2022a
* HarperCollins 2024
* Morton 2005, p. 603

2. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018i
* Paivio 2014, pp. vi–vii

3. ^

* Kim 2011, pp. 2–3, 5–6
* Jaworski 2011, pp. 5–8, 68–69
* McQueen & McQueen 2010, p. 135
* Morton 2005, p. 603

4. ^

* Sharov 2012, pp. 343–344
* Carruthers 2019, pp. ix, 29–30
* Griffin 1998, pp. 53–55

5. ^ Stich & Warfield 2008, pp. ix–x
6. ^

* Pashler 2013, pp. xxix–xxx
* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 14–17

7. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018j
* American Psychological Association 2018i
* Merriam-Webster 2024
* Kim 2011, p. 7

8. ^

* HarperCollins 2022b
* Kim 2011, pp. 5, 31
* Swinburne 1998, Lead Section

9. ^

* HarperCollins 2022c
* Merriam-Webster 2024a

10. ^

* HarperCollins 2022d
* Bermúdez 2014, p. 16

11. ^

* HarperCollins 2022e
* Merriam-Webster 2024b

12. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 273–274
* Nairne 2011, p. 312
* Merriam-Webster 2024c

13. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018i
* Uttal 2020, pp. 96–97
* Jaworski 2011, p. 4

14. ^

* Hoad 1993, p. 294
* Smith 1996, p. 105
* Cresswell 2010, p. 275
* Sansonese 1994, p. 116
* Giannopulu 2019, p. 6

15. ^

* Sharov 2012, pp. 343–344
* Pashler 2013, pp. xxix–xxx
* Paivio 2014, pp. vi–vii
* Vanderwolf 2013, p. 155

16. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 85–86, 123–124
* Martin 1998, Perception
* Gross 2020, pp. 74–76
* Sadri & Flammia 2011, pp. 53–54

17. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 208–209, 241
* American Psychological Association 2018e

18. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 210, 241
* Tulving 2001, p. 278
* Tsien 2005, p. 861

19. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 214–217, 241
* Tsien 2005, p. 861

20. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 249, 290
* Ball 2013, pp. 739–740

21. ^

* Nunes 2011, p. 2006
* Groarke, § 9. The Syllogism
* Ball 2013, pp. 739–740
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, p. 254

22. ^

* Ball 2013, pp. 739–740
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 257–258, 290–291

23. ^ Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 265–266, 291
24. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, p. 269
* Rescorla 2023, Lead Section
* Aydede 2017

25. ^

* Singer 2000, pp. 227–228
* Kind 2017, Lead Section
* American Psychological Association 2018
* Hoff 2020, pp. 617–618

26. ^

* Weiner 2000, pp. 314–315
* Helms 2000, lead section
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 298, 336–337
* Müller 1996, p. 14

27. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 322–323, 337
* American Psychological Association 2018a

28. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 126–127, 131
* American Psychological Association 2018b
* McPeek 2009, Attention: Physiological

29. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 171, 202
* American Psychological Association 2018c

30. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 137–138
* Davies 2001, pp. 190–192
* Gennaro, Lead Section, § 1. Terminological Matters: Various Concepts of Consciousness

31. ^

* Davies 2001, pp. 191–192
* Smithies 2019, pp. 83–84
* Gennaro, § 1. Terminological Matters: Various Concepts of Consciousness

32. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 137–138
* Kihlstrom & Tobias 1991, p. 212
* American Psychological Association 2018d

33. ^

* Gennaro, Lead Section, § 1. Terminological Matters: Various Concepts of Consciousness
* Kind 2023, § 2.1 Phenomenal Consciousness

34. ^

* Mijoia 2005, pp. 1818–1819
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 137–138
* Steinberg Gould 2020, p. 151
* American Psychological Association 2018d
* Carel 2006, p. 176

35. ^

* Kim 2005, pp. 607–608
* Swinburne 2013, pp. 72–73
* Lindeman, § 1. General Characterization of the Propositional Attitudes

36. ^

* Harman 2013, pp. 1–2
* Broome 2021, § 1. Normativity and Reasons, §2. The Meaning of "Rationality"
* Siegel 2017, p. 157
* Maruyama 2020, pp. 172–173

37. ^

* Nolfi 2015, pp. 41–42
* Tappolet 2023, pp. 137–138
* Knauff & Spohn 2021, § 2.2 Basic Concepts of Rationality Assessment, § 4.2 Descriptive Theories
* Vogler 2016, pp. 30–31

38. ^

* Bartlett 2018, pp. 1, 4–5
* Schwitzgebel 2024, § 2.1 Occurrent Versus Dispositional Belief
* Wilkes 2012, p. 412

39. ^

* Kenny 1992, pp. 71–72
* Perler 2015, pp. 3–6, 11
* Hufendiek & Wild 2015, pp. 264–265

40. ^

* Kenny 1992, p. 75
* Perler 2015, pp. 5–6

41. ^

* Kenny 1992, pp. 75–76
* Perler 2015, pp. 5–6

42. ^

* Kenny 1992, pp. 78–79
* Perler 2015, pp. 5–6
* McLear, § 1i. Sensibility, Understanding, and Reason

43. ^

* Deutsch 2013, p. 354
* Schweizer 1993, p. 848

44. ^ Robbins 2017, § 1. What Is a Mental Module?
45. ^

* Robbins 2017, Lead Section, § 1. What Is a Mental Module?
* Perler 2015, p. 7
* Hufendiek & Wild 2015, pp. 264–265
* Bermúdez 2014, p. 277

46. ^

* Robbins 2017, § 1. What Is a Mental Module?
* Hufendiek & Wild 2015, pp. 265–268
* Bermúdez 2014, pp. 288–290

47. ^

* Hufendiek & Wild 2015, pp. 267–268
* Robbins 2017, § 3.1. The Case for Massive Modularity
* Bermúdez 2014, p. 277

48. ^

* Robbins 2017, § 1. What Is a Mental Module?
* Hufendiek & Wild 2015, pp. 266–267

49. ^

* Robbins 2017, § 1. What Is a Mental Module?
* Bermúdez 2014, p. 289

50. ^

* Olson 2013, pp. 111–112
* Kim 2011, pp. 17–18
* O’Madagain, Lead Section
* Bayne 2022, pp. 8–9

51. ^

* Kim 2011, pp. 18–20
* Bayne 2022, pp. 8–10
* Audi 1993, pp. 167–168

52. ^

* Kriegel 2014, p. 384
* Searle 1991, pp. 45–47, 50
* Gillett 1996, pp. 191–192

53. ^ Jacob 2023, § 1. Why Is Intentionality So-called?
54. ^

* O’Madagain, Lead Section
* Kriegel 2015, p. 141
* Kim 2011, pp. 23–25
* Kriegel 2014, pp. 383–384
* Crane 1998, pp. 229–230

55. ^

* Levin 2023, § 2.3 Behaviorism
* Graham 2023, § 1. What Is Behaviorism?, § 5. Why Be a Behaviorist
* Cunningham 2000, p. 40

56. ^

* Levin 2023, Lead Section, § 1. What Is Functionalism?
* Polger, Lead Section
* Cunningham 2000, p. 40

57. ^

* Rescorla 2020, Lead Section, § 3. The Classical Computational Theory of Mind
* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 2–3
* Bermúdez 2014, pp. 3, 85

58. ^

* Rowlands, Lau & Deutsch 2020, Lead Section, § 1. Introduction
* Smith, Lead Section

59. ^

* Rowlands, Lau & Deutsch 2020, § 1. Introduction, § 3. Content Externalism
* Smith, § 1. Hilary Putnam and Natural Kind Externalism

60. ^

* Rowlands, Lau & Deutsch 2020, § 1. Introduction, § 5. Extended Mind
* Greif 2017, pp. 4311–4312
* Kiverstein, Farina & Clark 2013

61. ^

* Rowlands, Lau & Deutsch 2020, § 7. Extended Mind and the 4E Mind
* Rowlands 2009, pp. 53–56

62. ^

* Kim 2005, p. 608
* Jaworski 2011, pp. 11–12
* Searle 2004, pp. 3–4

63. ^

* Jaworski 2011, pp. 34–36
* Kim 2005, p. 608
* Searle 2004, pp. 13, 41–42
* Matheson 2017, p. 12

64. ^

* Jaworski 2011, pp. 5, 202–203
* Searle 2004, p. 44

65. ^

* Jaworski 2011, p. 5
* Searle 2004, pp. 44, 47–48

66. ^ Jaworski 2011, p. 246
67. ^ Jaworski 2011, p. 256
68. ^

* Marcum 2008, p. 19
* Stoljar 2010, p. 10

69. ^

* Jaworski 2011, p. 68
* Stoljar 2024, Lead Section
* Searle 2004, p. 48

70. ^

* Jaworski 2011, pp. 71–72
* Searle 2004, pp. 75–76

71. ^

* Jaworski 2011, pp. 72–73, 102–104
* Searle 2004, p. 148

72. ^

* Ravenscroft 2005, p. 47
* Stoljar 2024, § 2.2.1 Type Physicalism

73. ^

* Jaworski 2011, pp. 129–130
* Bigaj & Wüthrich 2015, p. 357

74. ^

* Levin 2023, Lead Section
* Searle 2004, p. 62

75. ^

* Levin 2023, § 1. What Is Functionalism?
* Jaworski 2011, pp. 136–137

76. ^

* Weisberg, Lead Section, § 1. Stating the Problem
* Blackmore 2013, pp. 33–35
* Searle 2004, pp. 39–40

77. ^

* Opris et al. 2017, pp. 69–70
* Barrett 2009, pp. 326–327

78. ^

* Popescu & Opris 2017, pp. 23–24
* Scanlon & Sanders 2018, p. 178
* Yukalov & Sornette 2014, How Brains Make Decisions

79. ^

* Athreya & Mouza 2016, pp. 52–53
* Schoenberg, Marsh & Lerner 2011, p. 60
* Benarroch 2021, pp. 437–438

80. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018f
* Schoenberg, Marsh & Lerner 2011, p. 66

81. ^

* Sanderson & Huffman 2019, pp. 59–61
* Saab 2009, pp. 1–2
* Scanlon & Sanders 2018, pp. 178–180

82. ^

* Athreya & Mouza 2016, pp. 52–53
* Opris et al. 2017, p. 70
* Schoenberg, Marsh & Lerner 2011, pp. 69–72

83. ^

* Athreya & Mouza 2016, pp. 52–53
* Schoenberg, Marsh & Lerner 2011, pp. 76–77
* Benarroch 2021, pp. 437–438

84. ^

* Reisyan 2015, pp. 91–92
* American Psychological Association 2018g

85. ^

* Winkelman 2011, p. 24
* Meyer et al. 2022, p. 27
* Frankish & Kasmirli 2009, p. 107
* Bunge 2014, p. 18

86. ^

* Dash & Villemarette-Pitman 2005, pp. 30–31
* Turkington & Mitchell 2010, p. 115

87. ^

* Macmillan & Lena 2010, pp. 641–643
* Marsh et al. 2007, p. 44

88. ^ Macmillan & Lena 2010, p. 655
89. ^ Roth 2013, p. 3
90. ^ Hatfield 2013, pp. 3–4
91. ^

* Hatfield 2013, pp. 4–5
* Roth 2013, pp. 3–4

92. ^ Roth 2013, pp. 265–266
93. ^

* Roth 2013, pp. 265–266
* Erulkar & Lentz 2024, § Evolution and Development of the Nervous System
* Hatfield 2013, pp. 6–7

94. ^

* Erulkar & Lentz 2024, § Evolution and Development of the Nervous System
* Hatfield 2013, p. 13

95. ^

* Aboitiz & Montiel 2007, p. 7
* Aboitiz & Montiel 2012, pp. 14–15
* Finlay, Innocenti & Scheich 2013, p. 3
* Jerison 2013, pp. 7–8

96. ^

* Hatfield 2013, pp. 6–8
* Reyes & Sherwood 2014, p. 12
* Wragg-Sykes 2016, p. 183

97. ^

* Hatfield 2013, p. 9
* Wragg-Sykes 2016, p. 183
* Fagan & Durrani 2021, 3\. Enter Homo Sapiens (c. 300,000 Years Ago and Later)

98. ^

* Roth 2013, p. 3
* Hatfield 2013, pp. 36–43
* Mandalaywala, Fleener & Maestripieri 2014, pp. 28–29

99. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 171, 202, 342–343, 384
* Gross 2020, pp. 171–172, 184
* Nairne 2011, pp. 131–132, 240

100. ^

* Yeomans & Arnold 2013, p. 31
* Oakley 2004, p. 1
* Nairne 2011, pp. 131–132

101. ^

* Coall et al. 2015, pp. 57–58
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 345–346
* Abel 2003, pp. 231–232

102. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 342–344, 347–348, 384
* Packer 2017, pp. 7–8
* Smitsman & Corbetta 2011, Action in Infancy – Perspectives, Concepts, and Challenges
* Nairne 2011, pp. 131–132

103. ^

* Packer 2017, pp. 7–8
* Freeman 1975, p. 114
* Driscoll & Easterbrooks 2007, p. 256
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, p. 384

104. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 349–350
* Gross 2020, pp. 566–572

105. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, p. 384
* Harrell 2018, pp. 478–479

106. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 384–385
* Gross 2020, pp. 619–620, 625–626
* Berman, Weems & Stickle 2006, pp. 285–292
* Nairne 2011, pp. 124–125, 131–132

107. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, p. 385
* Gross 2020, pp. 633–638, 664
* Nairne 2011, pp. 124–125, 131–132

108. ^

* Carruthers 2019, pp. ix, 29–30
* Griffin 1998, pp. 53–55

109. ^ Spradlin & Porterfield 2012, pp. 17–18
110. ^

* Carruthers 2019, pp. 29–30
* Steiner 2014, p. 93
* Thomas 2020, pp. 999–1000

111. ^

* Griffin 2013, p. ix
* Carruthers 2019, p. ix
* Fischer 2021, pp. 28–29

112. ^

* Fischer 2021, pp. 30–32
* Lurz, Lead Section
* Carruthers 2019, pp. ix, 29–30
* Penn, Holyoak & Povinelli 2008, pp. 109–110

113. ^

* Melis & Monsó 2023, pp. 1–2
* Rysiew 2012

114. ^

* Fischer 2021, pp. 32–35
* Lurz, Lead Section
* Griffin 1998, pp. 53–55
* Carruthers 2019, pp. ix–x
* Penn, Holyoak & Povinelli 2008, pp. 109–110

115. ^

* McClelland 2021, p. 81
* Franklin 1995, pp. 1–2
* Anderson & Piccinini 2024, pp. 232–233
* Carruthers 2004, pp. 267–268

116. ^

* Carruthers 2004, pp. 267–268
* Levin 2023, Lead Section, § 1. What Is Functionalism?
* Searle 2004, p. 62
* Jaworski 2011, pp. 136–137

117. ^

* Biever 2023, pp. 686–689
* Carruthers 2004, pp. 248–249, 269–270

118. ^ Carruthers 2004, pp. 270–273
119. ^

* Chen 2023, p. 1141
* Bringsjord & Govindarajulu 2024, § 8. Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
* Butz 2021, pp. 91–92

120. ^

* Bringsjord & Govindarajulu 2024, § 8. Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
* Fjelland 2020, pp. 1–2

121. ^ Murphy, Donovan & Smart 2020, pp. 97–99, 103–104, 112
122. ^

* Gross 2020, pp. 731–735
* Nairne 2011, pp. 450–453
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 455–457

123. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 466–468
* Gross 2020, pp. 751–752
* Nairne 2011, pp. 459–461

124. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 473–474, 476–477
* Gross 2020, p. 755
* Nairne 2011, p. 466

125. ^

* Nairne 2011, p. 471
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 485–486

126. ^

* Noll 2009, p. 122
* Sharma & Branscum 2020, p. 122
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 480–481
* Nairne 2011, pp. 468–469

127. ^

* Gross 2020, p. 766
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 472–473

128. ^

* Nairne 2011, pp. 472–473, 475–478
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 457–460

129. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 502–503
* Nairne 2011, pp. 485–486
* Gross 2020, pp. 773–774

130. ^

* Nairne 2011, pp. 493–494
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 503–505
* Gross 2020, pp. 781–782

131. ^

* Nairne 2011, pp. 493, 495–496
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 508–509
* Gross 2020, pp. 789–790

132. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 508–509
* Nairne 2011, pp. 502–503
* Gross 2020, pp. 784–785

133. ^

* Nairne 2011, pp. 499–500
* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 505–506

134. ^

* Bernstein & Nash 2006, pp. 525–527
* Nairne 2011, pp. 487–490
* Gross 2020, pp. 774–779

135. ^

* Pashler 2013, pp. xxix–xxx
* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. xix, 12–13

136. ^

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, p. 1
* Uttal 2011, pp. 1–4

137. ^

* Gross 2020, pp. 1–3
* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 15–16

138. ^

* Dawson 2022, pp. 161–162
* Gross 2020, pp. 4–6

139. ^

* Higgs, Cooper & Lee 2019, pp. 3–4
* Gross 2020, pp. 4–8

140. ^

* Gross 2020, pp. 4–6
* Thornton & Gliga 2020, p. 35
* Sharma & Sharma 1997, pp. 7–9

141. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018k
* American Psychological Association 2018l

142. ^ Gross 2020, pp. 4–8
143. ^

* Hood 2013, pp. 1314–1315
* Dumont 2008, pp. 17, 48
* Howitt & Cramer 2011, pp. 16–17

144. ^

* Dumont 2008, pp. 17, 48
* Howitt & Cramer 2011, pp. 11–12

145. ^

* Howitt & Cramer 2011, pp. 232–233
* Dumont 2008, pp. 27–28

146. ^

* Howitt & Cramer 2011, pp. 232–233, 294–295
* Dumont 2008, pp. 29–30

147. ^

* Howitt & Cramer 2011, pp. 220–221, 383–384
* Dumont 2008, p. 28

148. ^

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 17–18
* Hellier 2014, pp. 31–32
* Marcus & Jacobson 2012, p. 3

149. ^

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 17–18
* Engelmann, Mulckhuyse & Ting 2019, p. 159
* Scharff 2008, pp. 270–271
* Hellier 2014, pp. 31–32

150. ^

* Stich & Warfield 2008, pp. ix–x
* Mandik 2014, pp. 1–4, 14
* Kind 2018, Lead Section
* Adams & Beighley 2015, p. 54

151. ^ Timpe, § Lead Section, § 3. Free Will and Determinism
152. ^

* Stich & Warfield 2008, pp. ix–xi
* Shaffer 2015, pp. 555–556
* Audi 2006, § Philosophical Methods

153. ^

* Brown & Fehige 2019, Lead Section
* Goffi & Roux 2011, pp. 165, 168–169

154. ^

* Smith 2018, Lead Section, § 1. What Is Phenomenology?, §6. Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind
* Smith 2013, pp. 335–336

155. ^ a b

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 2–3
* Bermúdez 2014, pp. 3, 85

156. ^

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, p. 2
* Spruit 2008, p. 203

157. ^

* Friedenberg, Silverman & Spivey 2022, pp. 8–9
* Bermúdez 2014, pp. 122–123

158. ^

* Bermúdez 2014, pp. 85, 129–130
* Koenig 2004, p. 274

159. ^

* Avramides 2023, Lead Section, § 1.4 Perceptual Knowledge of Other Minds
* Overgaard 2010, pp. 255–258

160. ^

* American Psychological Association 2018h
* Dunbar 2007, p. 30

161. ^

* Luhrmann 2023, Abstract, § Introduction, § Conclusion: The Understanding of Mind in the West Is Peculiar
* Toren 2010, pp. 577–580, 582
* Beatty 2019

162. ^ Franks 2007, pp. 3055–3056
163. ^

* Karunamuni 2015, pp. 1–2
* Coseru 2017, Lead Section; § 2.3 The Five Aggregates
* Laine 1998, Lead Section

164. ^

* Laine 1998, § Philosophy of Mind in the Upaniṣads
* Rao 2002, pp. 315–316

165. ^

* Clark, Lints & Smith 2004, pp. 52–53
* Duncan & LoLordo 2013, p. xvi

166. ^

* Rassool 2021, p. 74
* Rothman 2021, p. 2010

167. ^

* Wong 2023, Lead Section
* Hall & Ames 1998

168. ^

* Chazan 2022, pp. 15–16
* Bartlett & Burton 2007, pp. 81–85
* Murphy 2003, pp. 5, 19–20
* Alexander 2013, pp. 109–110

169. ^ Emaliana 2017, pp. 59–61
170. ^

* Bartlett & Burton 2007, pp. 81–85
* Murphy 2003, pp. 5, 19–20

171. ^

* Sysling 2022, p. 407
* Dixon & Shapiro 2022, 5\. Mind, Brain, and Morality

172. ^

* Stairs 1998, Lead Section
* HarperCollins 2022

### Sources

[edit]

* Abel, Ernest L. (2003). "Fetal Alcohol Syndrome". In Blocker, Jack S.; Fahey, David M.; Tyrrell, Ian R. (eds.). Alcohol and Temperance in Modern History: An International Encyclopedia. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-57607-834-1.
* Aboitiz, F.; Montiel, J. F. (2007). Origin and Evolution of the Vertebrate Telencephalon, with Special Reference to the Mammalian Neocortex. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-540-49761-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-02. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Aboitiz, F.; Montiel, J. F. (2012). "From Tetrapods to Primates: Conserved Developmental Mechanisms in Diverging Ecological Adaptations". In Hofman, Michel A.; Falk, Dean (eds.). Evolution of the Primate Brain: From Neuron to Behavior. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-53860-4. Archived from the original on 2024-05-02. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Adams, Fred; Beighley, Steve (2015). "The Mark of the Mental". In Garvey, James (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Mind. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4742-4391-9. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Alexander, Robin (2013). Essays on Pedagogy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-02790-1.
* American Psychological Association (2018). "Imagination". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2023-11-30. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018a). "Emotion". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-02-07. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018b). "Attention". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018c). "Learning". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2023-03-25. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018d). "Unconscious". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2023-03-18. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018e). "Memory". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2023-11-30. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* American Psychological Association (2018f). "Brain". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* American Psychological Association (2018g). "Neurotransmitter". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* American Psychological Association (2018h). "Theory of Mind". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-05-07. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* American Psychological Association (2018i). "Mind". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2020-09-20. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* American Psychological Association (2018j). "Psyche". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 2024-05-09. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* American Psychological Association (2018k). "Personality". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association.
* American Psychological Association (2018l). "Personality Psychology". APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association.
* Anderson, Neal G.; Piccinini, Gualtiero (2024). The Physical Signature of Computation: A Robust Mapping Account. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-883364-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* Athreya, Balu H.; Mouza, Chrystalla (2016). Thinking Skills for the Digital Generation: The Development of Thinking and Learning in the Age of Information. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-12364-6. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Audi, Robert (1993). The Structure of Justification. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44612-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-11. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Audi, Robert (2006). "Philosophy". In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 7: Oakeshott - Presupposition (2. ed.). Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. ISBN 978-0-02-865787-5. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
* Avramides, Anita (2023). "Other Minds". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 23 May 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
* Aydede, Murat (2017). "Language of Thought". Oxford Bibliographies. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780195396577-0151. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
* Ball, Linden J. (2013). "Thinking". In Pashler, Harold (ed.). Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-5057-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Barrett, Lisa Feldman (2009). "The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 4 (4): 326–339. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01134.x. PMC 2763392. PMID 19844601.
* Bartlett, Gary (2018). "Occurrent States". Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 48 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/00455091.2017.1323531.
* Bartlett, Steve; Burton, Diana (2007). Introduction to Education Studies (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-2193-0.
* Bayne, Tim (2022). Philosophy of Mind: An Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-66984-9.
* Beatty, Andrew (2019). "Psychological Anthropology". Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780199766567-0124. ISBN 978-0-19-976656-7. Archived from the original on 15 March 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
* Benarroch, Eduardo E. (2021). Neuroscience for Clinicians: Basic Processes, Circuits, Disease Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-094891-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Berman, Steven L.; Weems, Carl F.; Stickle, Timothy R. (2006). "Existential Anxiety in Adolescents: Prevalence, Structure, Association with Psychological Symptoms and Identity Development". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 35 (3): 285–292. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9032-y.
* Bermúdez, José Luis (2014). Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind (2. ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05162-1.
* Bernstein, Douglas; Nash, Peggy W. (2006). Essentials of Psychology. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-71312-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-17. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Biever, Celeste (2023). "ChatGPT Broke the Turing Test — the Race Is on for New Ways to Assess AI". Nature. 619 (7971): 686–689. Bibcode:2023Natur.619..686B. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-02361-7. PMID 37491395.
* Bigaj, Tomasz; Wüthrich, Christian (2015). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-31082-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Blackmore, Susan (2013). Consciousness: An Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4441-2827-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Bringsjord, Selmer; Govindarajulu, Naveen Sundar (2024). "Artificial Intelligence". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
* Broome, John (2021). "Reasons and Rationality". The Handbook of Rationality. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-36185-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Brown, James Robert; Fehige, Yiftach (2019). "Thought Experiments". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 21 November 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
* Bunge, Mario (2014). The Mind–Body Problem: A Psychobiological Approach. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-4831-5012-3. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Butz, Martin V. (2021). "Towards Strong AI". KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. 35 (1): 91–101. doi:10.1007/s13218-021-00705-x.
* Carel, Havi (2006). Life and Death in Freud and Heidegger. Rodopi. ISBN 978-90-420-1659-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Carruthers, Peter (2004). The Nature of the Mind: An Introduction (1 ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-29994-7.
* Carruthers, Peter (2019). Human and Animal Minds: The Consciousness Questions Laid to Rest (1 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884370-2.
* Chazan, Barry (2022). "What Is "Education"?". Principles and Pedagogies in Jewish Education. Springer International Publishing. pp. 13–21. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83925-3_3. ISBN 978-3-030-83925-3. S2CID 239896844.
* Chen, Zhaoman (2023). "Exploration of Youth Social Work Model Driven by Artificial Intelligence". In Hung, Jason C.; Yen, Neil Y.; Chang, Jia-Wei (eds.). Frontier Computing: Theory, Technologies and Applications (FC 2022). Springer Nature. ISBN 978-981-99-1428-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* Clark, Kelly James; Lints, Richard; Smith, James K. A. (2004). "Mind/Soul/Spirit". 101 Key Terms in Philosophy and Their Importance for Theology. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-22524-7. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Coall, David A.; Callan, Anna C.; Dickins, Thomas E.; Chisholm, James S. (2015). "Evolution and Prenatal Development: An Evolutionary Perspective". Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Socioemotional Processes. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-95387-7. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Coseru, Christian (2017). "Mind in Indian Buddhist Philosophy". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 3 August 2019. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
* Crane, Tim (1998). "Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental". In O'Hear, Anthony (ed.). Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge university press. ISBN 978-0-521-63927-9.
* Cresswell, Julia (2010). Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954793-7. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Cunningham, Suzanne (2000). What Is a Mind?: An Integrative Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Hackett Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87220-518-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Dash, Paul; Villemarette-Pitman, Nicole (2005). Alzheimer's Disease. Demos Medical Publishing. ISBN 978-1-934559-49-9. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Davies, Martin (2001). "Consciousness". In Wilson, Robert A.; Keil, Frank C. (eds.). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-73144-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Dawson, Michael R. W. (2022). What Is Cognitive Psychology?. Athabasca University Press. ISBN 978-1-77199-342-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Deutsch, Eliot (2013). "The Self in Advaita Vedanta". In Perrett, Roy W. (ed.). Metaphysics: Indian Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-70266-3. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Dixon, Thomas; Shapiro, Adam (2022). "5. Mind, Brain, and Morality". Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-256677-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-09. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Driscoll, Joan Riley; Easterbrooks, M. Ann (2007). "Development, Emotional". In Cochran, Moncrieff; New, Rebecca S. (eds.). Early Childhood Education: An International Encyclopedia. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-0-313-01448-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Dumont, K. (2008). "2. Research Methods and Statistics". In Nicholas, Lionel (ed.). Introduction to Psychology. University of Capetown Press. ISBN 978-1-919895-02-4. Archived from the original on 2024-05-01. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Dunbar, Robin I. M. (2007). "Brain and Cognition in Evolutionary Perspective;". In Platek, Steven; Keenan, Julian; Shackelford, Todd Kennedy (eds.). Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-16241-8. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Duncan, Stewart; LoLordo, Antonia (2013). "Introduction". Debates in Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-13660-4. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Emaliana, Ive (2017). "Teacher-Centered or Student-Centered Learning Approach To Promote Learning?". Jurnal Sosial Humaniora. 10 (2): 59. doi:10.12962/j24433527.v10i2.2161. S2CID 148796695.
* Engelmann, Jan B.; Mulckhuyse, Manon; Ting, Chih-Chung (2019). "Brain Measurement and Manipulation Methods;". In Schram, Arthur; Ule, Aljaž (eds.). Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78811-056-3. Archived from the original on 2024-04-26. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Erulkar, Solomon D.; Lentz, Thomas L. (2024). "Nervous System". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
* Fagan, Brian M.; Durrani, Nadia (2021). "3. Enter Homo Sapiens (c. 300,000 Years Ago and Later)". World Prehistory: The Basics. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-46679-9.
* Finlay, Barbara L.; Innocenti, Giorgio M.; Scheich, Henning (2013). "Evolutionary and Developmental Syntheses: Introduction". The Neocortex: Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4899-0652-6. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Fischer, Bob (2021). Animal Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-48440-5.
* Fjelland, Ragnar (2020). "Why General Artificial Intelligence Will Not Be Realized". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 7 (1). doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4. hdl:11250/2726984. ISSN 2662-9992.
* Frankish, Keith; Kasmirli, Maria (2009). "8. Mind and Consciousness". In Shand, John (ed.). Central Issues of Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-6270-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Franklin, Stan (1995). Artificial Minds. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-06178-0.
* Franks, David D. (2007). "Mind". In Ritzer, George (ed.). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-2433-1.
* Freeman, Derek (1975). "Kinship, Attachment Behaviour and the Primary Bond". In Goody, Jack (ed.). The Character of Kinship. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29002-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Friedenberg, Jay; Silverman, Gordon; Spivey, Michael (2022). Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind (4 ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-5443-8015-5.
* Gennaro, Rocco J. "Consciousness". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 April 2024. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
* Giannopulu, Irini (2019). Neuroscience, Robotics and Virtual Reality: Internalised Vs Externalised Mind/Brain. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-95558-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Gillett, Eric (1996). "Searle and the "Deep Unconscious"". Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology. 3 (3): 191–200. doi:10.1353/ppp.1996.0027.
* Goffi, Jean-Yves; Roux, Sophie (2011). "On the Very Idea of a Thought Experiment". Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Brill: 165–191. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004201767.i-233.35. ISBN 978-90-04-20177-4. S2CID 260640180. Archived from the original on 30 October 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
* Graham, George (2023). "Behaviorism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 9 July 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
* Greif, Hajo (2017). "What Is the Extension of the Extended Mind?". Synthese. 194 (11): 4311–4336. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0799-9. PMC 5686289. PMID 29200511.
* Griffin, Donald R. (1998). "Mind, Animal". States of Brain and Mind. Springer Science. ISBN 978-1-4899-6773-2.
* Griffin, Donald R. (2013). Animal Minds: Beyond Cognition to Consciousness. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-22712-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* Groarke, Louis F. "Aristotle: Logic". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 13 March 2024. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
* Gross, Richard (2020). Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour (8 ed.). Hodder Education. ISBN 978-1-5104-6846-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Hall, David L.; Ames, Roger T. (1998). "Xin (Heart-and-mind)". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-G021-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 8 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
* Harman, Gilbert (2013). "Rationality". The International Encyclopedia of Ethics (1 ed.). Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee181. ISBN 978-1-4051-8641-4. Archived from the original on 2022-08-14. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* HarperCollins (2022). "Parapsychology". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2022a). "Mind". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 29 September 2023. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2022b). "Soul". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 12 May 2024. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2022c). "Spirit". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 12 February 2024. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2022d). "Cognition". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 17 November 2023. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2022e). "Intellect". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Archived from the original on 9 May 2024. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* HarperCollins (2024). "Definition of Mind". Collin's Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
* Harrell, Stevan (2018). Human Families. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-8133-3622-0. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Hatfield, Gary (2013). "Introduction: The Evolution of Mind, Brain, and Culture". In Hatfield, Gary; Pittman, Holly (eds.). Evolution of Mind, Brain, and Culture. University of Pennsylvania Museum of archaeology and anthropology. ISBN 978-1-934536-49-0.
* Hellier, Jennifer L. (2014). "Introduction: Neuroscience Overview". The Brain, the Nervous System, and Their Diseases. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-61069-338-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-26. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Helms, Marilyn M., ed. (2000). "Motivation and Motivation Theory". Encyclopedia of Management (4. ed.). Gale Group. ISBN 978-0-7876-3065-2. Archived from the original on 2021-04-29. Retrieved 2021-05-13.
* Higgs, Suzanne; Cooper, Alison; Lee, Jonathan (2019). Biological Psychology. Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-5264-8278-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Hoad, T. F. (1993). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-283098-2.
* Hoff, Eva V. (2020). "Imagination". In Runco, Mark A.; Pritzker, Steven R. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-815615-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-18. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Hood, Ralph W. (2013). "Methodology in Psychology". Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Springer Netherlands. pp. 1314–1322. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_695. ISBN 978-1-4020-8265-8. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Howitt, Dennis; Cramer, Duncan (2011). Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology (3 ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0-273-73499-4.
* Hufendiek, Rebekka; Wild, Markus (2015). "6. Faculties and Modularity". The Faculties: A History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-993527-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Jacob, Pierre (2023). "Intentionality". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 29 August 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
* Jaworski, William (2011). Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction (1 ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4443-3367-1.
* Jerison, H. J. (2013). "Fossil Brains and the Evolution of the Neocortex". In Finlay, Barbara L.; Innocenti, Giorgio M.; Scheich, Henning (eds.). The Neocortex: Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4899-0652-6. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Karunamuni, Nandini D. (2015). "The Five-Aggregate Model of the Mind". SAGE Open. 5 (2). doi:10.1177/2158244015583860.
* Kenny, Anthony (1992). "5. Abilities, Faculties, Powers, and Dispositions". The Metaphysics of Mind. pp. 66–85. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192830708.003.0005. ISBN 978-0-19-167052-7.
* Kihlstrom, John F.; Tobias, Betsy A. (1991). "Anosognosia, Consciousness, and the Self". In Prigatano, George P.; Schacter, Daniel L. (eds.). Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury: Clinical and Theoretical Issues. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-505941-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Kim, Jaegwon (2005). "Mind, Problems of the Philosophy of". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7. Archived from the original on 11 April 2024. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
* Kim, Jaegwon (2011). Philosophy of Mind (3rd ed.). Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-4458-4.
* Kind, Amy (2017). "Imagination". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-V017-2. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 2024-04-18. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Kind, Amy (2018). "The Mind–Body Problem in 20th-Century Philosophy". Philosophy of Mind in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Volume 6. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-01938-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Kind, Amy (2023). "1. The Mind-Body Problem: Dualism Rebooted". In Kind, Amy; Stoljar, Daniel (eds.). What Is Consciousness?: A Debate. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-86666-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Kiverstein, Julian; Farina, Mirko; Clark, Andy (2013). "The Extended Mind Thesis". Oxford Bibliographies. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
* Knauff, Markus; Spohn, Wolfgang (2021). "Psychological and Philosophical Frameworks of Rationality—A Systematic Introduction". The Handbook of Rationality. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-36185-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Koenig, Oliver (2004). "Modularity: Neuroscience". In Houdé, Olivier; Kayser, Daniel; Koenig, Olivier; Proust, Joëlle; Rastier, François (eds.). Dictionary of Cognitive Science: Neuroscience, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, and Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-45635-1. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Kriegel, Uriah (2014). "Intentionality". In Bayne, Tim; Cleeremans, Axel; Wilken, Patrick (eds.). The Oxford Companion to Consciousness. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-102103-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Kriegel, Uriah (2015). The Varieties of Consciousness. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-984612-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Laine, Joy (1998). "Mind, Indian Philosophy of". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-F070-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 8 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
* Levin, Janet (2023). "Functionalism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
* Lindeman, David. "Propositional Attitudes". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 21 February 2024. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
* Luhrmann, Tanya Marie (2023). "Mind". The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on 7 May 2024. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
* Lurz, Robert. "Minds, Animal". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 May 2024. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
* Macmillan, Malcolm; Lena, Matthew L. (2010). "Rehabilitating Phineas Gage". Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 20 (5): 641–658. doi:10.1080/09602011003760527. PMID 20480430.
* Mandalaywala, Tara; Fleener, Christine; Maestripieri, Dario (2014). "Intelligence in Nonhuman Primates". In Goldstein, Sam; Princiotta, Dana; Naglieri, Jack A. (eds.). Handbook of Intelligence: Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4939-1562-0. Archived from the original on 2024-05-02. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Mandik, Pete (2014). This Is Philosophy of Mind: An Introduction. Wiley Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-470-67447-5.
* Marcum, James A. (2008). An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine: Humanizing Modern Medicine. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4020-6797-6. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Marcus, Elliott M.; Jacobson, Stanley (2012). Integrated Neuroscience: A Clinical Problem Solving Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4615-1077-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-26. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Marsh, Ian; Melvill, Gaynor; Morgan, Keith; Norris, Gareth; Walkington, Zoe (2007). Theories of Crime. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-19842-9. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Martin, M. G. F. (1998). "Perception". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-07310-3. Archived from the original on 2024-03-26. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Maruyama, Yoshihiro (2020). "Rationality, Cognitive Bias, and Artificial Intelligence: A Structural Perspective on Quantum Cognitive Science". In Harris, Don; Li, Wen-Chin (eds.). Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Design Part 2. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-49183-3. Archived from the original on 2024-04-20. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Matheson, Benjamin (2017). "Introduction". In Nagasawa, Yujin; Matheson, Benjamin (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-48609-7.
* McClelland, Tom (2021). What Is Philosophy of Mind?. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-5095-3878-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* McLear, Colin. "Kant: Philosophy of Mind". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 16 April 2024.
* McPeek, Robert M. (2009). "Attention: Physiological". In Goldstein, E. Bruce (ed.). Encyclopedia of Perception. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4522-6615-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* McQueen, Paddy; McQueen, Hilary (2010). Key Concepts in Philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-137-09339-4. Archived from the original on 2024-05-11. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Melis, Giacomo; Monsó, Susana (2023). "Are Humans the Only Rational Animals?". The Philosophical Quarterly. 74 (3): 844–864. doi:10.1093/pq/pqad090.
* Merriam-Webster (2024). "Definition of Mentality". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2023-07-01. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Merriam-Webster (2024a). "Definition of Spirit". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2024-05-11. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Merriam-Webster (2024b). "Definition of Intellect". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Merriam-Webster (2024c). "Definition of Intelligence". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2024-04-05. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Meyer, Jerrold S.; Meyer, Jerry; Farrar, Andrew M.; Biezonski, Dominik; Yates, Jennifer R. (2022). Psychopharmacology: Drugs, the Brain, and Behavior. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-1-60535-987-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Mijoia, Alain de (2005). "The Unconscious". International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Macmillan Reference USA. ISBN 978-0-02-865927-5.
* Morton, Adam (2005). "Mind". In Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
* Müller, Jörg P. (1996). The Design of Intelligent Agents: A Layered Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-540-62003-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-25. Retrieved 2024-04-25.
* Murphy, Patricia (2003). "1. Defining Pedagogy". In Gipps, Caroline V. (ed.). Equity in the Classroom: Towards Effective Pedagogy for Girls and Boys. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-71682-0. Archived from the original on 25 January 2024. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
* Murphy, Dominic; Donovan, Caitrin; Smart, Gemma Lucy (2020). "Mental Health and Well-Being in Philosophy". In Sholl, Jonathan; Rattan, Suresh I. S. (eds.). Explaining Health Across the Sciences. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-52663-4. Archived from the original on 2024-05-05. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
* Nairne, James S. (2011). Psychology (5 ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-8400-3310-9.
* Nolfi, Kate (2015). "Which Mental States Are Rationally Evaluable, And Why?". Philosophical Issues. 25 (1): 41–63. doi:10.1111/phis.12051.
* Noll, Richard (2009). The Encyclopedia of Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-7508-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-05. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
* Nunes, Terezinha (2011). "Logical Reasoning and Learning". In Seel, Norbert M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4419-1427-9. Archived from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2024.
* Oakley, Lisa (2004). Cognitive Development. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-54743-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Olson, Eric T. (2013). "There Is No Problem of the Self". In Gallagher, Shaun; Shear, Jonathan (eds.). Models of the Self. Andrews UK Limited. ISBN 978-1-84540-723-0. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Opris, Ioan; Casanova, Manuel F.; Lebedev, Mikhail A.; Popescu, Aurel I. (2017). "Prefrontal Cortical Microcircuits Support the Emergence of Mind". In Opris, Ioan (ed.). The Physics of the Mind and Brain Disorders: Integrated Neural Circuits Supporting the Emergence of Mind. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-319-29672-2.
* Overgaard, Søren (2010). "The Problem of Other Minds". Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Springer Netherlands. pp. 254–268. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_14. ISBN 978-90-481-2646-0. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* O’Madagain, Cathal. "Intentionality". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 28 April 2024. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
* Packer, Martin J. (2017). Child Development: Understanding A Cultural Perspective. Sage. ISBN 978-1-5264-1311-6. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Paivio, Allan (2014). Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-317-71690-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Pashler, Harold (2013). "Introduction". Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-5057-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Penn, Derek C.; Holyoak, Keith J.; Povinelli, Daniel J. (2008). "Darwin's Mistake: Explaining the Discontinuity Between Human and Nonhuman Minds". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 31 (2): 109–130. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08003543. PMID 18479531.
* Perler, Dominik (2015). "Introduction". The Faculties: A History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-993527-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Polger, Thomas W. "Functionalism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 19 May 2019. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
* Popescu, Aurel I.; Opris, Ioan (2017). "Introduction: From Neurons to the Mind". In Opris, Ioan (ed.). The Physics of the Mind and Brain Disorders: Integrated Neural Circuits Supporting the Emergence of Mind. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-319-29672-2.
* Rao, A. Venkoba (2002). "'Mind' in Indian Philosophy". Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 44 (4): 315–325. ISSN 0019-5545. PMC 2955300. PMID 21206593.
* Rassool, G. Hussein (2021). Islamic Psychology: Human Behaviour and Experience from an Islamic Perspective. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-36292-3. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Ravenscroft, Ian (2005). Philosophy of Mind: A Beginner's Guide. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925254-1. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Reisyan, Garo D. (2015). Neuro-Organizational Culture: A New Approach to Understanding Human Behavior and Interaction in the Workplace. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-22147-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Rescorla, Michael (2020). "The Computational Theory of Mind". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 December 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
* Rescorla, Michael (2023). "The Language of Thought Hypothesis". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
* Reyes, Laura D.; Sherwood, Chet C. (2014). "Neuroscience and Human Brain Evolution". In Bruner, Emiliano (ed.). Human Paleoneurology. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-08500-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-02. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Robbins, Philip (2017). "Modularity of Mind". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 16 April 2024.
* Roth, Gerhard (2013). The Long Evolution of Brains and Minds. Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-6258-9.
* Rothman, Abdallah (2021). Developing a Model of Islamic Psychology and Psychotherapy: Islamic Theology and Contemporary Understandings of Psychology. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-41621-3. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Rowlands, Mark; Lau, Joe; Deutsch, Max (2020). "Externalism About the Mind". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2024.
* Rowlands, Mark (2009). "Enactivism and the Extended Mind". Topoi. 28 (1): 53–62. doi:10.1007/s11245-008-9046-z.
* Rysiew, Patrick (2012). "Rationality". Oxford Bibliographies. Archived from the original on 23 December 2022. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
* Saab, Carl Y. (2009). The Hindbrain. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-1965-6. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Sadri, Houman A.; Flammia, Madelyn (2011). Intercultural Communication: A New Approach to International Relations and Global Challenges. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-0309-3. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Sanderson, Catherine A.; Huffman, Karen R. (2019). Real World Psychology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-119-57775-1. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Sansonese, J. Nigro (1994). The Body of Myth: Mythology, Shamanic Trance, and the Sacred Geography of the Body. Inner Traditions / Bear & Co. ISBN 978-0-89281-409-1. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Scanlon, Valerie C.; Sanders, Tina (2018). Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology. F. A. Davis. ISBN 978-0-8036-9006-6. Archived from the original on 2024-04-22. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Scharff, Lauren Fruh VanSickle (2008). "Sensation and Perception Research Methods". In Davis, Stephen F. (ed.). Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-75672-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-26. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Schoenberg, Mike R.; Marsh, Patrick J.; Lerner, Alan J. (2011). "Neuroanatomy Primer: Structure and Function of the Human Nervous System". In Schoenberg, Mike R.; Scott, James G. (eds.). The Little Black Book of Neuropsychology: A Syndrome-Based Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-76978-3. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Schweizer, Paul (1993). "Mind/Consciousness Dualism in Sankhya-Yoga Philosophy". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 53 (4). doi:10.2307/2108256. JSTOR 2108256.
* Schwitzgebel, Eric (2024). "Belief". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 15 November 2019. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
* Searle, John R. (1991). "Consciousness, Unconsciousness and Intentionality". Philosophical Issues. 1: 45–66. doi:10.2307/1522923. JSTOR 1522923.
* Searle, John R. (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515733-8.
* Shaffer, Michael J. (2015). "The Problem of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and Conceptual Analysis". Metaphilosophy. 46 (4–5): 555–563. doi:10.1111/meta.12158. Archived from the original on 2016-07-10. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
* Sharma, Manoj; Branscum, Paul (2020). Foundations of Mental Health Promotion. Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN 978-1-284-19975-8. Archived from the original on 2024-05-05. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
* Sharma, Rajendra Kumar; Sharma, Rachana (1997). Social Psychology. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. ISBN 978-81-7156-707-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Sharov, Alexei A. (2012). "Minimal Mind". In Swan, Liz (ed.). Origins of Mind. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-94-007-5419-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-21. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Siegel, Harvey (2017). Education's Epistemology: Rationality, Diversity, and Critical Thinking. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-068267-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-20. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Singer, Jerome L. (2000). "Imagination". In Kazdin, Alan E. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Psychology (Volume 4). American Psychological Association [u.a.] ISBN 978-1-55798-187-5.
* Smith, Basil. "Internalism and Externalism in the Philosophy of Mind and Language". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2024.
* Smith, Jeremy J. (1996). An Historical Study of English: Function, Form and Change. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-13273-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Smith, David Woodruff (2013). "Phenomenological Methoda in Philosophy of Mind". In Haug, Matthew (ed.). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-10710-9. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Smith, David Woodruff (2018). "Phenomenology". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 23 June 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2024.
* Smithies, Declan (2019). The Epistemic Role of Consciousness. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-094853-5. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Smitsman, Ad W.; Corbetta, Daniela (2011). "Action in Infancy – Perspectives, Concepts, and Challenges". In Bremner, J. Gavin; Wachs, Theodore D. (eds.). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Infant Development, Volume 1: Basic Research. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-5183-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-03. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Spradlin, W. W.; Porterfield, P. B. (2012). The Search for Certainty. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-5212-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* Spruit, Leen (2008). "Renaissance Views of Active Perception". In Knuuttila, Simo; Kärkkäinen, Pekka (eds.). Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4020-6125-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Stairs, Allen (1998). "Parapsychology". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-W029-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 13 May 2023. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
* Steinberg Gould, Carol (2020). "6. Psychoanalysis, Imagination, and Imaginative Resistance: A Genesis of the Post-Freudian World". In Moser, Keith; Sukla, Ananta (eds.). Imagination and Art: Explorations in Contemporary Theory. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-43635-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Steiner, Gary (2014). "Cognition and Community". In Petrus, Klaus; Wild, Markus (eds.). Animal Minds & Animal Ethics: Connecting Two Separate Fields. transcript Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8394-2462-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-06. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
* Stich, Stephen P.; Warfield, Ted A. (2008). "Introduction". The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-99875-5. Archived from the original on 2024-05-01. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Stoljar, Daniel (2010). Physicalism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-14922-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Stoljar, Daniel (2024). "Physicalism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 3 November 2019. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
* Swinburne, Richard (1998). "Soul, Nature and Immortality of the". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-K096-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6. Archived from the original on 2023-09-28. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Swinburne, Richard (2013). Mind, Brain, and Free Will. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-105744-1. Archived from the original on 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Sysling, Fenneke (2022). "Human Sciences and Technologies of the Self Since the Nineteenth Century". In McCallum, David (ed.). The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Human Sciences. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-981-16-7255-2. Archived from the original on 2024-05-09. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
* Tappolet, Christine (2023). Philosophy of Emotion: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-68743-1.
* Thomas, Evan (2020). "Descartes on the Animal Within, and the Animals Without". Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 50 (8): 999–1014. doi:10.1017/can.2020.44. ISSN 0045-5091.
* Thornton, Stephanie; Gliga, Teodora (2020). Understanding Developmental Psychology. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-137-00669-1. Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Timpe, Kevin. "Free Will". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
* Toren, Christina (2010). "Psychological Anthropology". In Barnard, Alan; Spencer, Jonathan (eds.). The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-40978-0.
* Tsien, Joe Z. (2005). "Learning and Memory". In Albers, R. Wayne; Price, Donald L. (eds.). Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-047207-2. Archived from the original on 2024-04-20. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Tulving, Endel (2001). "Episodic Vs. Semantic Memory". In Wilson, Robert A.; Keil, Frank C. (eds.). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-73144-7. Archived from the original on 2024-02-18. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Turkington, Carol; Mitchell, Deborah R. (2010). "Hippocampus". The Encyclopedia of Alzheimer's Disease. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-2858-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Uttal, William R. (2011). Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-01596-7. Archived from the original on 2024-05-01. Retrieved 2024-04-28.
* Uttal, William R. (2020). Neural Theories of Mind: Why the Mind-Brain Problem May Never Be Solved. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-000-14940-1. Archived from the original on 2024-05-09. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
* Vanderwolf, Case H. (2013). An Odyssey Through the Brain, Behavior and the Mind. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4757-3779-0. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Vogler, Candace A. (2016). John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape (Routledge Revivals): An Essay in Moral Psychology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-20617-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-20. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Weiner, Bernard (2000). "Motivation: An Overview". In Kazdin, Alan E. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Psychology (Volume 5). American Psychological Association [u.a.] ISBN 978-1-55798-187-5.
* Weisberg, Josh. "Hard Problem of Consciousness". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 19 July 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
* Wilkes, K. V. (2012). "Mind and Body: Some Forms of Reductionism". In Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.). An Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-98816-7. Archived from the original on 2024-04-20. Retrieved 2024-04-21.
* Winkelman, Michael J. (2011). "A Paradigm for Understanding Altered Consciousness: The Integrative Mode of Consciousness". In Cardeña, Etzel; Winkelman, Michael J. (eds.). Altering Consciousness: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-38309-0. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.
* Wong, David (2023). "Mind (Heart-Mind) in Chinese Philosophy". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
* Wragg-Sykes, Rebecca (2016). "Humans Evolve". Big History: Our Incredible Journey, from Big Bang to Now [Hardcover] [Oct 02, 2016] Dk. Dorling Kindersley. ISBN 978-0-241-22590-5. Archived from the original on May 2, 2024. Retrieved May 4, 2024.
* Yeomans, Jane; Arnold, Christopher (2013). "Child Development". Teaching, Learning and Psychology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-05633-9. Archived from the original on 2024-05-13. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
* Yukalov, V. I.; Sornette, D. (2014). "How Brains Make Decisions". In Freund, Friedemann; Langhoff, Stephanie (eds.). Universe of Scales: From Nanotechnology to Cosmology: Symposium in Honor of Minoru M. Freund. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-02207-9. Archived from the original on 2024-04-23. Retrieved 2024-04-23.

## External links

[edit]

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Consciousness studies

Mind at Wikipedia's sister projects

* Definitions from Wiktionary
* Media from Commons
* News from Wikinews
* Quotations from Wikiquote
* Texts from Wikisource
* Textbooks from Wikibooks
* Resources from Wikiversity

* v
* t
* e

Consciousness

Figures|

| Philosophy|

* Alfred North Whitehead
* Arthur Schopenhauer
* Baruch Spinoza
* Bertrand Russell
* Brian O'Shaughnessy
* Charles Augustus Strong
* Christopher Peacocke
* Colin McGinn
* Daniel Dennett
* David Chalmers
* David Hume
* David Papineau
* David Pearce
* Donald Davidson
* Douglas Hofstadter
* Edmund Husserl
* Frank Jackson
* Fred Dretske
* Galen Strawson
* George Berkeley
* George Henry Lewes
* Georges Rey
* Gottfried Leibniz
* Immanuel Kant
* John Eccles
* John Locke
* John Polkinghorne
* John Searle
* Joseph Levine
* Karl Popper
* Keith Frankish
* Kenneth M. Sayre
* Maurice Merleau-Ponty
* Max Velmans
* Michael Tye
* Martin Heidegger
* Ned Block
* Patricia Churchland
* Paul Churchland
* Philip Goff
* René Descartes
* Thomas Metzinger
* Thomas Nagel
* William Kingdon Clifford
* William Lycan
* William Seager

|

Psychology|

* Carl Gustav Jung
* Donald D. Hoffman
* Franz Brentano
* Gustav Fechner
* Julian Jaynes
* Kurt Koffka
* Max Wertheimer
* Sigmund Freud
* Wilhelm Wundt
* William James
* Wolfgang Köhler

Neuroscience|

* Anil Seth
* Antonio Damasio
* Benjamin Libet
* Bernard Baars
* Christof Koch
* Francis Crick
* Francisco Varela
* Gerald Edelman
* Giulio Tononi
* Karl Pribram
* Lawrence Weiskrantz
* Michael Gazzaniga
* Michael Graziano
* Patrick Wilken
* Roger Sperry
* Stanislas Dehaene
* Steven Laureys
* Stuart Hameroff
* Wolf Singer

Others|

* Annaka Harris
* David Bohm
* Eugene Wigner
* Erwin Schrödinger
* Marvin Minsky
* Max Planck
* Roger Penrose
* Susan Blackmore
* Victor J. Stenger
* Wolfgang Pauli

Theories|

| Philosophy of mind|

* Anomalous monism
* Computationalism
* Double-aspect theory
* Eliminative materialism
* Emergentism
* Epiphenomenalism
* Functionalism
* Idealism
* Interactionism
* Materialism
* Mind–body dualism
* Monism
* Neutral monism
* New mysterianism
* Nondualism
* Panpsychism
* Parallelism
* Physicalism
* Property dualism
* Reflexive monism
* Revisionary materialism
* Solipsism
* Type physicalism (reductive materialism, identity theory)

|

Science|

* Attention schema theory
* Dynamic core hypothesis
* Damasio's theory of consciousness
* Electromagnetic theories of consciousness
* Global workspace theory
* Higher-order theories of consciousness
* Holonomic brain theory
* Integrated information theory
* Lamme's recurrent feedback hypothesis
* Multiple drafts model
* Orchestrated objective reduction

Topics|

* Agnosia
* Altered state of consciousness
* Animal consciousness
* Artificial consciousness
* Attention
* Attentional control
* Awareness
* Binding problem
* Binocular rivalry
* Blindsight
* Brain
* Cartesian theater
* Consciousness after death
* Disorders of consciousness
* Divided consciousness
* Dual consciousness (split-brain)
* Experience
* Explanatory gap
* Free will
* Flash suppression
* Hallucination
* Hard problem of consciousness
* Heterophenomenology
* Higher consciousness
* Illusion
* Introspection illusion
* Knowledge argument
* Locked-in syndrome
* Mind
* Mind–body problem
* Minimally conscious state
* Neural correlates of consciousness
* Neurophenomenology
* Ontology
* Phenomenology
* Philosophical zombie
* Philosophy of mind
* Primary consciousness
* Problem of other minds
* Qualia
* Quantum mind
* Reentry
* Sakshi
* Purusha
* Secondary consciousness
* Sentience
* Sentientism
* Sociology of human consciousness
* Soul
* Stream of consciousness
* Subconscious
* Subjective character of experience
* Subjectivity and objectivity
* Unconscious mind
* Unconsciousness
* Upanishads
* Visual masking
* Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation
* Yogachara

Works|

* A Universe of Consciousness
* Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness
* Consciousness and Cognition
* Consciousness Explained
* Cosmic Consciousness
* How the Self Controls Its Brain
* Journal of Consciousness Studies
* Online Consciousness Conference
* Psyche
* The Astonishing Hypothesis
* The Conscious Mind
* The Emperor's New Mind
* The Science of Consciousness
* Understanding Consciousness
* "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?"
* Wider than the Sky

* Category
* Commons

Portals:

* Philosophy
* Psychology

Authority control databases

National|

* Germany
* Czech Republic

Other|

* İslâm Ansiklopedisi

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template