Modal metaphysics

Branch of philosophy

Modal metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that investigates the metaphysics underlying statements about what is possible or necessary.[1] These include propositions such as "It is possible that I become a dentist" or "Necessarily, 2 + 2 = 4." Unlike ordinary factual statements, modal statements concern not just what is actual but what could or must be the case. Modal metaphysics seeks to understand what makes such statements true or false—what grounds their truth.

One influential framework for understanding modal claims comes from the development of modal logic, especially in the work of Saul Kripke. Kripke introduced the use of possible worlds as a formal tool: abstract representations of how things could have been. On this view, a statement like "Possibly, p" is true if there exists at least one possible world where p is true; "Necessarily, p" is true if p holds in every possible world.

However, while Kripke’s logic provided a powerful semantic apparatus, it did not resolve the metaphysical question at the heart of modal metaphysics: What are possible worlds? And what makes them the truth-makers of modal statements? In other words, even if modal logic explains how modal statements are evaluated, it does not explain why they are true.

## See also

[edit]

* Modal logic
* Modal neo-logicism

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "Modal Metaphysics" – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

This article about metaphysics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

|

* v
* t
* e

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template