Montreal–Philippines cutlery controversy

2006 racial controversy in Canada

The Montreal–Philippines cutlery controversy was an incident in 2006 in which a Filipino-born Canadian boy was punished by his school in Roxboro, Montreal, for following traditional Filipino etiquette and eating his lunch with a fork and a spoon, rather than the Canadian tradition of a knife and fork.

In response to the media coverage of the affair, a protest was held outside the Canadian embassy in Manila and the Philippine Ambassador to Canada, José Brillantes, described it as an "affront to Filipino culture."[1] Some commentators saw it as an example of prejudice, nationalism and a culture clash, especially since the school board had previously expelled a Sikh student for carrying a kirpan (Sikh dagger).[2]

## Timeline

[edit]

The boy, John Luke Joachim Gallardo Cagadoc (gallicized as Jean-Luc), was born in 1998 in Manila to Filipino parents from Pampanga and Palawan. The Cagadocs migrated to Quebec, Canada, the same year for job opportunities, settling in Montreal.

In April 2006, schoolteacher Martine Bertrand, who was assigned a role of school lunchroom monitor at École Lalande, sanctioned the then seven-year-old Luc on ten separate occasions for what the school called "disgusting" and "piggish" eating habits: using a fork to push his food onto a spoon before eating it. The school board countered that the boy was punished only for disruptive behavior. The boy's mother, Theresa Gallardo Cagadoc, pursued a formal apology and reported that school principal Normand Bergeron told her in a telephone conversation that in Canada, one should eat with Canadian manners ("Madame, you are in Canada. Here in Canada you should eat the way Canadians eat.").[3]

The story first appeared in the West Island Chronicle. According to the Montreal-area newspaper, when Cagadoc questioned Bergeron about punishing students for their table habits, Bergeron replied that Luc must be moved to another table if he continues to "eat like a pig" as it was their manner of how they discipline students.

In a Chronicle article, Bergeron expanded on his comments, claiming that Luc was sometimes disruptive, which was the reason for his sanctions and not his fork and spoon habits:

> [In my conversation with (the mother)] I said, "Here, this is not the manner in which we eat." ... I don't necessarily want students to eat with one hand or with only one instrument, I want them to eat intelligently at the table ... I want them to eat correctly with respect for others who are eating with them. That's all I ask. Personally, I don’t have any problems with it, but it is not the way you see people eat every day. I have never seen somebody eat with a spoon and a fork at the same time.

Later reporting alleged that Luc was warned that he was tardy at the table, and so he reverted to the spoon-feeding method to save time. Luc said that he was separated from his lunchmates any time he ate that way.

Bergeron was subsequently restrained from speaking on the issue by the school board; spokesperson Brigitte Gavreau stated that board policy was that students could eat with any utensils.

A score of protestors outside the Canadian Embassy in Manila appealed for "respect for cultural diversity" and affirmed "we eat with a spoon and we're proud."[4] The item was quickly picked up worldwide, especially in Filipino newspapers and websites.

A security guard was assigned to the primary school, a police cruiser went on duty, and the school principal received a death threat. Fo Niemi, the Cagadocs' lawyer and the executive director for the Center for Research-Action on Race Relations (CRARR), had to actively discourage people from the Filipino community from protesting in front of the school board.

France Pilon, the assistant director of the school board, said that Luc's parents were repeatedly invited to meet with school officials, but declined, reportedly on legal advice. Pilon also said that Luc's parents have instructed him to eat apart from other students.

The case was brought to the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal for formal mediation.[2][5] For safety and security, Luc was transferred to a different elementary school.[6]

## Commission ruling

[edit]

In 2008 the Quebec Human Rights and Youth Rights Commission ruled that Bertrand's reprimand was an isolated incident, and found no evidence that Bergeron was biased.[7] It found that Luc was disciplined for unsafe eating behavior,[8] not for his cutlery etiquette.[7]

The commission concluded that Luc was clowning around by stuffing a large amount of rice into his mouth, and that the reprimand was for his own safety.[8] The commission concluded that it was discriminatory for Bertrand to have asked Luc if people in "his country" washed their hands before eating.[7][8]

In November 2008 it was reported that CRARR had asked the Human Rights and Youth Rights Commission to review its decision, alleging anomalies in process that possibly prejudiced the commission's decision. The principal's newspaper comments were allegedly ignored. Theresa Cagadoc said that the human rights commission had interviewed representatives from the school board, but not the Cagadocs. Theresa was reportedly considering an appeal to the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal, a quasi-judicial body,[7][8] while members of the area's Filipino community wanted to take the case to court.[7]

In April 2010 the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal mandated that the school reimburse the Cagadocs CDN $17,000 in moral and punitive damages. The Tribunal stated that the school principal shared blame for not implementing an intercultural education policy.[9][10]

## See also

[edit]

* Culture of the Philippines
* Eating utensil etiquette
* Etiquette in Asia
* Etiquette in North America
* Pastagate
* Table manners

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Montreal boy's silverware choice sparks protest in Philippines, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, May 5, 2006.
2. ^ a b Incident might have been a mistake Archived 2008-10-04 at the Wayback Machine, Montreal Gazette, May 8, 2006
3. ^ Food fight infuriates Filipinos at home and abroad, CTV News, May 5, 2006
4. ^ Protesters accused Canadian school of discriminating Filipino boy, May 5, 2006 (from website of Sun.Star network of local newspapers in the Philippines)
5. ^ "Board seeks mediation in food fight." Archived 2006-06-17 at the Wayback Machine 13 June 2006 . Montreal Gazette.
6. ^ Canada school spoon incident still unresolved, The Manila Mail, January 15, 2007.
7. ^ a b c d e Cutlery controversy back on the table Archived 2009-04-06 at the Wayback Machine, The Asian Pacific Post, November 19, 2008
8. ^ a b c d Canada ’spoon’ row seethes, Manila Mail, October 18, 2008
9. ^ m'Spoon-and-fork boy' wins $17K in damages in Canada
10. ^ Gallardo c. Bergeron, 2010 QCTDP 5, Human Rights Tribunal of Quebec (Quebec, Canada)

## External links

[edit]

* "School won't apologize in Filipino fork dispute". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
* "Montreal boy's silverware choice sparks protest in Philippines." Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
* "Board seeks mediation in food fight." 13 June 2006 . Montreal Gazette.
* "Incident might have been a mistake." Montreal Gazette. 8 May 2006.
* " Filipino boy gets support in lunch flap" Montreal Gazette. 6 May 2006.
* "Boy who ate in traditional Filipino way going to human rights group". Montreal Gazette. 5 May 2005.
* "Filipino table etiquette punished at local school" Montreal West Island Chronicle (via archive.org). 19 April 2006
* "Filipino mom to ask for public apology." Montreal West Island Chronicle (via archive.org). 26 April 2006.
* Knife? Fork? Spoon" Not necessarily. at Jason Skog (2008). Teens in the Philippines. Compass Point Books. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-7565-3853-8.
* Valerie Petrillo (2007). A Kid's Guide to Asian American History: More Than 70 Activities. Chicago Review Press. pp. 141. ISBN 978-1-55652-634-3. "Generally they eat with a fork and spoon, although eating with hands is still common."

* v
* t
* e

Canadian identity

* Culture of Canada
* Canadian cultural protectionism
* Demographics of Canada
* Canadian values

National identities in Canada|

* Canadians
* Canadian ethnicity
* Canadian nationalism
* Quebec nationalism
* culture of Quebec
* Western alienation
* Alberta separatism
* Annexationism
* Anti-Americanism

Symbols|

* National
* Provincial and territorial
* Royal
* Flags
* Heraldry
* Debates and legislation:
* Name (1867)
* Canadian Citizenship Act, 1946
* National Anthem Act (1980)
* Debate on the monarchy in Canada
* monarchism and republicanism
* Great Flag debate (1963–1964)

Culture|

* Culture of Canada
* Canadiana
* Sports:
* ice hockey
* Montreal Canadiens
* Toronto Maple Leafs
* Canadiens–Maple Leafs rivalry
* Edmonton Oilers
* Calgary Flames
* Toronto Blue Jays
* Cuisine:
* maple syrup
* poutine
* Festivals:
* Calgary Stampede
* Carnaval
* Media of Canada
* Architecture of Canada
* Canadian humour
* Music of Canada

Landmarks, parks and nature|

* National parks
* Winter in Canada
* Niagara Falls
* CN Tower
* Parliament Hill
* Chateau Frontenac
* Plains of Abraham
* Banff
* Canadian Rockies

War and peacekeeping|

* Canadian Armed Forces
* List of Canadian peacekeeping missions
* War of 1812
* Canada in World War I
* Canada in World War II
* Canada in the Cold War
* Canada and the Vietnam War
* Canada in the Korean War
* Canada in the War in Afghanistan

Crown corporations|

* Government of Canada
* CBC
* Bank of Canada
* Royal Canadian Mint
* Royal Canadian Mounted Police
* VIA Rail Canada Inc

Relations between English
and French Canada|

* Acadian movement
* Great Upheaval
* Anti-Quebec sentiment
* National question (Quebec)
* Quebec sovereignty movement
* Federalism in Quebec
* Two Solitudes
* Distinct society
* État québécois:
* Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms
* Charter of the French Language
* Civil Code of Quebec
* Notable events:
* Lower Canada Rebellion (1837–1838)
* Durham Report (1839)
* Trial of Louis Riel (1885)
* Manitoba Schools Question (1890–1896)
* Regulation 17 (1912)
* Conscription Crisis of 1917
* Conscription Crisis of 1944
* Quiet Revolution
* Vive le Québec libre speech (1967)
* October Crisis (1970)
* 1980 Quebec referendum
* 1995 Quebec referendum
* Unity Rally
* Sponsorship scandal (1996–2004)
* Québécois nation motion (2006)

Language politics|

* Official bilingualism in Canada
* Gendron Commission
* Language policies of Canada's provinces and territories
* legal dispute over Quebec's language policy
* Official bilingualism in the public service of Canada
* Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism
* Timeline of official languages policy in Canada

Federal–Provincial–
Territorial relations|

* Province-building
* Rebellions of 1837–1838
* Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations (1937–1940)
* Royal Commission of Inquiry on Constitutional Problems (1953–1956)
* Patriation debate (1960s to 1982)
* Fulton–Favreau formula (to 1965)
* Canada Act 1982 and Constitution Act, 1982
* Canada Health Act (1984)
* Victoria Charter (1971)
* Meech Lake Accord (1987–1990)
* Citizen's Forum on National Unity (1990–1991)
* Charlottetown Accord (1992)
* Calgary Declaration (1997)

Aboriginal politics|

* National organizations
* Métis
* Red River Rebellion (1869)
* North-West Rebellion (1885)
* Indian Act (1876–present)
* Indian Register
* Oka Crisis (1990)
* Self-Government
* Inuit territories
* Inuvialuit (1984)
* NunatuKavut claimed
* Nunavik (no final agreement)
* Nunavut
* agreement 1993
* First Nations territories
* Eeyou Istchee James Bay
* Nitassinan claimed
* Royal Commission (1991–1996)
* 2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests

International relationships|

* NATO
* Canada–United States relations
* CUSMA
* NORAD
* Canada–United Kingdom relations
* Commonwealth of Nations
* British Empire
* Canada–France relations
* La Francophonie
* Canada (New France)

Current challenges|

* COVID-19 pandemic in Canada
* Canadian property bubble

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template