Neck-through-body construction

Method of electric guitar construction

This JJ Hucke (brand), Antarctica (model), guitar has neck-thru construction with no discernible heel. This greatly facilitates high fret access. The neck is Birdseye flamed Maple & Purpleheart while the "wings" are Poplar. Two headless .strandberg* Boden Plini model guitars with differing construction methods. On the left is neck-through construction with a quartersawn Roasted Maple neck and Swamp Ash wings. On the right is chamfered bolt-on quartersawn Mahogany neck and Mahogany body. Both necks have carbon reinforcement strips.

Neck-through-body (commonly neck-thru or neck-through) is a method of electric guitar construction that combines the instrument's neck and core of its body into a single unit. This may be made of a solid piece of wood, or two or more laminated together. The strings, nut, fretboard, pickups and bridge are all mounted on this central core. Additional body side components (if any) that fill-out its shape are glued or mechanically attached to this central core. These are referred to as "wings". The construction technique is also used on electric bass guitars.

Neck-through-body construction is considerably more expensive than the traditional glued set-in neck and bolt-on neck style construction methods. However, it's less costly than the very rare and difficult "one-piece" fabrication of an entire instrument made from a single piece of material.

## History

[edit]

The first electric bass guitar, the solid-body "Audiovox 736" created by Paul Tutmarc circa 1937, had a neck-through construction.

"The Log", a prototype solid-body guitar built by Les Paul in 1941, can be considered as a forerunner of neck-through designed instrument. Les Paul built the model using a recycled 4x4 fence post as the neck and body core, and mounted the disassembled parts of an Epiphone and Gibson archtop guitar onto it.

Neck-through construction on an early Ibanez Studio guitar. Despite its neck-thru construction, it has a bulky heel with little or no chamfering. This greatly negates the benefits of this more costly construction method.

The 1952-57 Harmony H44 had this construction feature.

In 1956 Rickenbacker was one of the first guitar manufacturers to use the modern variant of this technique, although this was originally restricted exclusively to semi-hollowbody guitars.[1]

## Pros and cons

[edit]

The most important benefit for the player of a neck-thru guitar is the reduction of heel mass. The heel is the term used to describe the thickened area at the body-neck junction. Body-neck connection area thickening is required for structural integrity. In the violin family of instruments this area's called the "button", "saddle" or "nose".

The area where the neck attaches to the body is naturally a weak zone. There's a lot of pressure exerted on the instrument due to the combined tension of all the strings pulling on the instrument between the tuners and the bridge. The neck-body connection area is weaker if you have to join a separate neck to a body. The screws (bolt-on) or glue (set-neck) used to connect the neck to the body requires significant area to be able to provide sound structural integrity to act against the string's tension and bond body to neck totally stably to ensure tuning stability of the instrument. Heel mass then becomes an obstacle when attempting to reach higher registers of the fretboard.

Front & back of an Ibanez RG model with a central neck-through core laminate constructed of Maple/Purpleheart/Maple running the length of the instrument. The glued-on wings are made from Swamp Ash. The top has a stained AAA grade flame Maple cap. The heel of this instrument has been significantly chamfered to improve high-register access.

Neck-through construction allows easier access to higher frets because there is no need for a bulky heel as there is no neck-to-body connection. In such an instrument, the neck morphs into the body of such an instrument. When constructing a neck-through guitar the luthier can chamfer the neck-body transition area (which would be the heel) to a minimum, sometimes almost relieving the heel entirely. This allows easier, sometimes unhindered, access to the upper registers.

For players of rhythm or open chords alone, or players that do not reach up to the highest registers of the fretboard in lead or solo playing, there is significantly less benefit accrued from this construction method.

A neck-thru guitar may sound warmer than a bolt-on construction instrument, with more sustain as well as better tuning stability and more easily attainable low fret action.[2] Scientific studies on the subject are lacking, and at least one experiment seemed to contradict the logic.[3] In modern high-end bolt-on and set neck instruments the attainment of low action is often just as possible as with neck-thru instruments.

The construction of a neck-thru instrument makes it inherently more rigid than a bolt on instrument and therefore somewhat less susceptible to temperature and humidity changes.[4] All guitars require maintenance and benefit from careful monitoring of humidity, but perhaps, electric neck-thru guitars require the least monitoring of all wooden guitars.[5]

Neck-through construction is harder and more expensive to mass-produce than bolt-on or set-in neck constructions. This method of construction may be somewhat more common in basses than in guitars.

Repairs to this type of neck can be more tedious if not impossible. Repairs to such instruments can be more costly because of this. In some cases, it may be easier to remove the old neck completely by removing the wings and replacing the core with an entirely component. Alternatively, such a guitar can be converted to a bolt-on or set-neck by creating a heel and affixing the new neck to the core already in place, rather than to try to repair the neck itself.[citation needed] However, due to the stability of this kind of construction, neck-through guitars tend to be more sturdy.[citation needed]

## Use

[edit]

This structure is used by many companies, including Parker Guitars, BC Rich, Yamaha, Cort Guitars, Ibanez (primarily on basses), Jackson, Alembic, Schecter, Carvin, ESP Guitars, .strandberg*, Dean, Halo, Rickenbacker and many others.

Many configurations of the Gibson Firebird and Thunderbird are also built neck-through.

The construction method is also popular with independent guitar builders, who can typically devote more time to such a labour-intensive neck joint than a mass-producing company could.

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Rickenbacker International Corporation: The Modern Era of the Electric Guitar, retrieved 14 June 2012
2. ^ Jed. "Bolt-on vs. Set Neck vs. Neck-Through Electric Guitars". Andertons Music Co., February 21, 2019. Accessed March 17, 2025.
3. ^ Mottola, R.M. (2007). "Sustain and Electric Guitar Neck Joint Type". American Lutherie (91): 52.
4. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-bawQEQy1c \- Vigilant Guitars
5. ^ https://www.guitarmeet.com/the-pros-cons-of-neck-through-guitars/

* v
* t
* e

String instrument neck joints

* Bolt-on
* Set-in
* Neck-through body
* Set-through

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template