Qin dynasty

First imperial dynasty in China (230–202 BC)

This article is about the first imperial Chinese dynasty and is not to be confused with the Qing dynasty, the final such dynasty.

"Qin Empire" redirects here. For other uses, see Qin Empire (disambiguation).

Qin

221–206 BC

Heirloom Seal of the Realm

Territory of the Qin dynasty,[note 1] with population centres and segments of the Great Wall marked

Capital| Xianyang
Common languages| Old Chinese
Government| Absolute monarchy
Emperor|

• 221–210 BC

| Qin Shi Huang

• 210–207 BC

| Qin Er Shi
Chancellor|

• 221–208 BC

| Li Si

• 208–207 BC

| Zhao Gao
Historical era| Imperial

• Founding of the state of Qin

| 770 BC

• Accession of Qin Shi Huang

| 221 BC

• Death of Qin Shi Huang

| 210 BC

• Surrender to Liu Bang

| 207 BC

• Destruction of Xianyang

| 206 BC
Area
220 BC[2]| 2,300,000 km2 (890,000 sq mi)
Currency| Banliang

Preceded by | Succeeded by

|

|  | Zhou dynasty

|

| Qin (state)
| Eighteen Kingdoms |

|

Han dynasty |
Nanyue |
Chinese name
Chinese| 秦
Hanyu Pinyin| Qín
| Transcriptions

Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin| Qín
Bopomofo| ㄑㄧㄣˊ
Wade–Giles| Chʻin2
Tongyong Pinyin| Cín
Yale Romanization| Chín
IPA| [tɕʰǐn]

Romanization| Zin
Yue: Cantonese
Yale Romanization| Chèuhn
Jyutping| Ceon4
IPA| [tsʰɵn˩]
Southern Min
Hokkien POJ| Chîn
Tâi-lô| Tsîn
Old Chinese
Baxter–Sagart (2014)| *[dz]i[n]
Part of a series on the

History of China

* Timeline
* Dynasties
* Historiography

Prehistoric

* Paleolithic

* * *

* Neolithic (c. 8500 – c. 2000 BC)

Yellow, Yangtze, and Liao civilization

Ancient

* Xia (c. 2070 – c. 1600 BC)

* * *

* Shang (c. 1600 – c. 1046 BC)

* * *

* Zhou (c. 1046 – c. 256 BC)

Western Zhou (1046–771 BC)
Eastern Zhou (771–256 BC)

Spring and Autumn (c. 770 – c. 476 BC)
Warring States (475–221 BC)

Imperial

* Qin (221–207 BC)

* * *

* Han (206 BC – 220 AD)

Western Han (202 BC – 9 AD)
Xin (9–23 AD)
Eastern Han (25–220 AD)

* * *

* Three Kingdoms (220–280 AD)

Wei, Shu, and Wu

* * *

* Jin (266–420)

|  |

Western Jin (266–316)
Eastern Jin (317–420)

* Sixteen Kingdoms (304–439)

|
|

* * *

* Northern and
Southern dynasties (420–589)

* * *

* Sui (581–618)

* * *

* Tang (618–907)

* * *

|  |

* Five Dynasties and
Ten Kingdoms (907–979)

* * *

* Song (960–1279)

Northern Song (960–1127)
Southern Song (1127–1279)

* Liao (916–1125)

* Western Xia (1038–1227)

* Jin (1115–1234)

|
|

* * *

* Yuan (1271–1368)

* * *

* Ming (1368–1644)

* * *

* Qing (1644–1912)

Modern

* Republic of China (mainland, 1912–1949)

* * *

|  |

* People's Republic
of China (1949–present)

* Republic of China (Taiwan,
1949–present)

|
|

Related articles

* Art history
* Economic history
* Education history
* Legal history
* LGBT history
* Media history
* Music history
* Timeline
* Military history
* Naval history
* History of religion in China
* Christianity
* Judaism
* Islam
* Science and technology history
* Archaeology
* Cartography
* Discoveries
* Inventions
* Transport history
* Women's history

* v
* t
* e

The Qin dynasty (/tʃɪn/ CHIN[3]) was the first imperial dynasty of China. It is named for its progenitor state of Qin, a fief of the confederal Zhou dynasty (c. 1046–256 BC). Beginning in 230 BC, the Qin under King Ying Zheng engaged in a series of wars conquering each of the rival states that had previously pledged fealty to the Zhou. This culminated in 221 BC with the successful unification of China under Qin, which then assumed an imperial prerogative - with Ying Zheng declaring himself to be Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China, and bringing an end to the Warring States period (c. 475–221 BC). This state of affairs lasted until 206 BC, when the dynasty collapsed in the years following Qin Shi Huang's death.[4] The Qin dynasty's 14-year existence was the shortest of any major dynasty in Chinese history, with only two emperors. However, the succeeding Han dynasty (202 BC - 220 AD) largely continued the military and administrative practices instituted by the Qin; as a result, the Qin have been credited as the originators of the Chinese imperial system that would endure in some form until the Xinhai Revolution in 1911.

Qin was a minor power for the first several centuries of its existence; its strength greatly increased in the 4th century BC, in large part owing to the administrative and military reforms of Shang Yang. They sought to create a strong, centralised state and a large army supported by a stable economy, which were developed in the Qin homeland and implemented across China following its unification. Reforms included the standardisation of currency, weights, measures, and the writing system, along with innovations in weaponry, transportation and military tactics.

The central government sought to undercut aristocrats and landowners and administer the peasantry directly, who comprised the vast majority of the population. This enabled numerous large-scale construction projects involving the labour of hundreds of thousands of peasants and convicts - which included the connection of walls along the northern border into what would eventually become the Great Wall of China, a large national road system, and the city-sized Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang guarded by the life-sized Terracotta Army. The state possessed an unprecedented capacity to transform the environment through the management of people and land; as a result, Qin's rise has been characterised as one of the most important events in East Asian environmental history.

When Qin Shi Huang died in 210 BC, two of his advisors placed an heir on the throne in an attempt to exert control over the dynasty and wield state power. These advisors squabbled among themselves, resulting in both of their deaths and that of the second Qin emperor. Popular revolt broke out, and the weakened empire soon fell to Chu generals Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, the latter of whom founded the Han dynasty.

## History

[edit]

### Origin and development, 9th century – 230 BC

[edit]

Main article: Qin (state)

See also: Timeline of the Warring States and the Qin dynasty

According to the Shiji (c. 91 BC), during the 9th century BC, Feizi - said to be a descendant of the legendary political advisor Gao Yao - was granted rule over the settlement of Qin (秦邑; modern Qingshui County, Gansu). During the rule of King Xiao of Zhou, this area became known as the state of Qin. In 897 BC, during the Gonghe Regency, the area was allocated as a dependency dedicated to raising horses.[5] In the late 8th century BC, one of Feizi's descendants, Duke Zhuang of Qin, was summoned by the Zhou to take part in a military campaign against the Western Rong; the effort was successful and Zhuang was rewarded with additional territory. In 770 BC, Zhuang's son Duke Xiang helped escort the Zhou court under King Ping in their emergency evacuation from Fenghao to Chengzhou under threat from the Western Rong - marking the divide between the Western and Eastern Zhou periodisations. As a reward, Duke Xiang was sent as the leader of an expedition against the Western Rong to recapture the territory they had taken, during which he formally established the Qin as a major vassal state, incorporating Fenghao and much of the territory previously under direct Zhou control and thus expanding Qin eastward.[6][7]

The state of Qin began military expeditions into central China in 672 BC. They initially refrained from making serious incursions due to the threat still posed by neighbouring tribes; by the 4th century BC, they had all either been subdued or conquered, setting the stage for Qin expansionism.[8]

#### Warring States period, c. 475–230 BC

[edit]

Territories of the Seven Warring States c. 250 BC, with the former capital of the Zhou royal family at Luoyang marked

* Qin
* Zhao
* Yan
* Wei
* Qi
* Han
* Chu

During the Warring States period (c. 475–221 BC), the Qin statesman Shang Yang introduced a series of advantageous military reforms between 361 BC and his death in 338. He also helped to construct the Qin capital at Xianyang (near modern Xi'an, Shaanxi) on the Wei River near the former Zhou capital of Fenghao - a city which ultimately resembled the capitals of the other states.[9] The Qin maintained a military that was superior in both doctrine and practice to that of the other Warring States. Its army was large, efficient, and staffed with capable generals. Unlike many of their enemies, the Qin utilised contemporary advancements in weapons technology and transportation, the latter of which enabled greater mobility across the different types of terrain throughout China.[10]

The geography of Qin's core territories - located at the heart of a region known as the Guanzhong - provided additional advantages, including fertile farmland, and a strategic position protected by mountains that made it a natural stronghold. The Guanzhong was in contrast with the flat, open Yangtze valley (also known as the "Guandong") to its south-east - during this period, Xianyang was the only capital city in China that did not require walls to be built around it.[11] The legacy of Qin society within the Guanzhong inspired a Han-era adage that "Guanzhong produces generals, while Guandong produces ministers."[5] The Qin's agricultural output, expanded via projects like the Wei River canal built in 246 BC, helped sustain their large army.[12][13]

Qin engaged in practical and ruthless warfare. From the preceding Spring and Autumn period (c. 770 – c. 481 BC), the prevailing philosophy had dictated war as a gentleman's activity; military commanders were instructed to respect what they perceived to be Heaven's laws in battle. For example, during a war Duke Xiang of Song was waging against Chu, he declined an opportunity to attack Chu forces that were crossing a river. After allowing them to cross and marshal their forces, he was decisively defeated in the ensuing battle. When he was admonished by his advisors for excessive courtesy to the enemy, he retorted, "The sage does not crush the feeble, nor give the order for attack until the enemy have formed their ranks."[14] The Qin disregarded this military tradition, taking advantage of their enemy's weaknesses. A nobleman in the state of Wei accused Qin of being "avaricious, perverse, eager for profit, and without sincerity. It knows nothing about etiquette, proper relationships, and virtuous conduct, and if there be an opportunity for material gain, it will disregard its relatives as if they were animals."[15] This, combined with strong leadership from long-lived rulers, an openness to employ talented men from other states, and a lack of internal opposition, contributed to the Qin's strong political base.[12]

### Unification and expansion, 230–210 BC

[edit]

Further information: Qin's wars of unification

During the Warring States period, the seven major states vying for dominance were Qin, Yan, Zhao, Qi, Chu, Han, and Wei. The rulers of these states styled themselves as kings, as opposed to the titles of lower nobility they had previously held. However, none elevated himself to believe that he had the Mandate of Heaven as claimed by the kings of Zhou, nor that he had the right to offer sacrifices.[16]

During the century that preceded the wars of unification, the Qin suffered several setbacks. Shang Yang was executed in 338 BC by King Huiwen due to a personal grudge harboured from his youth. There was also internal strife over the Qin succession in 307 BC, which decentralised Qin authority somewhat. The Qin was defeated by an alliance of the other states in 295 BC; this was soon followed by another defeat inflicted by Zhao, made possible by a majority of the Qin army already being occupied with defending against attacks by Qi. However, the aggressive Fan Sui [zh] became prime minister in 266 BC; after issues with the succession were resolved, Fan pursued an expansionist policy that had its origins in Jin and Qi, in which they endeavoured to conquer the other states.[17]

Stone slab bearing an inscription stating that it is an auspicious moment for Qin Shi Huang to ascend to the throne, that the country is united, and that no one will be dying on the roads.[note 2]

The Qin first attacked the Han directly to their east, and took their capital city of Xinzheng in 230 BC. They then struck the state of Zhao to their north, who surrendered in 228 BC, followed by the northernmost state of Yan in 226. Next, Qin launched assaults to the east and south; they took the Wei capital of Daliang (modern Kaifeng) in 225, and forced Chu to surrender in 223. They then deposed the Zhou dynasty's remnants at Luoyang; finally, they conquered Qi, taking their capital at Linzi in 221 BC.[18]

With the completion of Qin's conquests in 221 BC, King Zheng - who had acceded to the throne of Qin at age nine[19] - became the effective ruler of China.[20] The subjugation of the six states was done by King Zheng who had used efficient persuasion and exemplary strategy. He solidified his position as sole ruler with the abdication of his prime minister, Lü Buwei. The states made by the emperor were assigned to officials dedicated to the task rather than place the burden on people from the royal family.[20] He then combined the titles of the earlier Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors into the new name "Shi Huangdi", meaning 'First Emperor'. The newly declared emperor ordered all weapons not in the possession of the Qin to be confiscated and melted down. The resulting metal was sufficient to build twelve large ornamental statues at the Qin's newly declared capital at Xianyang.[21]

#### Southward expansion, 214–206 BC

[edit]

Main article: Qin campaign against the Baiyue

In 214 BC, Qin Shi Huang secured his boundaries to the north with a fraction (roughly 100,000 men) of his large army, and sent the majority (500,000 men) of his army to conquer the territory to their south, which was inhabited by the Baiyue peoples. Prior to Qin's campaigns unifying the former Zhou territories, the Baiyue had gained possession of much of Sichuan to their southwest. The Qin army was unfamiliar with the jungle terrain, and it was defeated by the southern tribes' guerrilla warfare tactics with over 100,000 men lost. However, in the defeat Qin was successful in building a canal to the south, which they used heavily for supplying and reinforcing their troops during their second attack to the south. Building on these gains, the Qin armies conquered the coastal lands surrounding Guangzhou, and took the provinces of Fuzhou and Guilin. They may have struck as far south as Hanoi. After these victories in the south, Qin Shi Huang moved over 100,000 prisoners and exiles to colonise the newly conquered area. In terms of extending the boundaries of his empire, Qin Shi Huang was extremely successful in the south.[21]

#### Campaign against the Xiongnu, 215 BC

[edit]

Main article: Qin's campaign against the Xiongnu

The Qin collectively referred to the peoples living on their northern border as the Five Barbarians; while sporadically subject to imperial rule, they remained free from it for the majority of the Qin's existence.[22] Prohibited from engaging in trade with local Qin peasantry, the Xiongnu inhabiting the Ordos Desert to the Qin's north-west frequently raided them instead. In retaliation, a military campaign was led by the Qin general Meng Tian. The region was conquered in 215 BC, and agriculture was established; however, the local peasants were discontented and later revolted.[23]

### Collapse and aftermath, 210–202 BC

[edit]

Rubbing of a Han-era stone relief depicting the 227 BC assassination attempt on the future Qin Shi Huang (right) by Jing Ke (left). Jing is held by a court physician (background), as a soldier (far right) rushes to save the emperor, who holds an imperial jade disc. Jing's dagger (centre) has become stuck in a pillar.

In total, three assassination attempts were made on Qin Shi Huang - one in 227 BC by Jing Ke, and the other two around 218 BC.[24] Owing in part to these incidents, the emperor became paranoid and obsessed with immortality. While on a trip to the eastern frontiers in 210 BC, Qin Shi Huang died in an attempt to procure an elixir of immortality from Taoist magicians, who claimed the elixir was stuck on an island guarded by a sea monster. The chief eunuch, Zhao Gao, and the prime minister, Li Si, hid the news of his death upon their return until they were able to alter his will. It is understood that his eldest son Fusu was intended to inherit the throne; however, Li and Zhao conspired to transmit a fabricated order for Fusu to commit suicide,[25] and instead elevated the former emperor's son Huhai to the throne, taking the name of Qin Er Shi.[19] They believed that they would be able to manipulate Huhai to their own ends, effectively allowing them to exert control over the empire. As expected, Qin Er Shi proved inept: he executed many ministers and imperial princes, continued massive building projects - one of the most extravagant was the lacquering of the city's walls - enlarged the army, increased taxes, and arrested messengers who delivered bad news. As a result, men from all over China revolted, attacking officials, raising armies, and declaring themselves kings of seized territories.[26]

During this time, Li Si and Zhao Gao came into conflict with one another, which culminated in Zhao persuading Qi Er Shi to put Li on trial, where he was ultimately executed. The worsening military situation then caused the emperor to blame Zhao for the rebellion; this pivot frightened Zhao, who engineered another conspiracy to deceive Qin Er Shi into believing hostile forces had arrived at the capital. The emperor's quarters were invaded, and Qin Er Shi was forced to commit suicide for his incompetence after being cornered by Zhao's co-conspirator and son-in-law Yan Le [zh].[27] Ziying, a son of Fusu, ascended to the throne, and immediately executed Zhao Gao.[26] Unrest continued to spread among the people - caused in large part by regional differences, which had persisted despite Qin's attempts to impose uniformity - and many local officials had declared themselves kings. In this climate, Ziying attempted to cling to his throne by declaring himself as merely one king among all the others.[13] He was undermined by his ineptitude, and popular revolt broke out in 209 BC. When Chu rebels under the lieutenant Liu Bang attacked, a state in such turmoil could not hold for long. Ziying surrendered to Liu Bang upon the latter's arrival in Xianyang in 207 BC; while initially spared by Liu, he was executed shortly thereafter by the Chu leader Xiang Yu. In 206 BC, Xianyang was destroyed, marking what historians consider to be the end of the imperial Qin dynasty.[28][note 3] With the former Qin territories temporarily divided into the Eighteen Kingdoms,[30] Liu Bang then betrayed Xiang Yu, beginning the Chu–Han Contention from which he ultimately emerged victorious atop a reunited realm - on 28 February 202 BC, he declared himself emperor of the newly founded Han dynasty.[31]

## Culture and society

[edit]

Layout of the palace's surroundings

Excavation of the western platform

A palace gate

Objects found at the site

Remains of the Epang Palace, destroyed in 206 BC

The Qin ruled over territories roughly corresponding to the extent at the time of Chinese culture, as well as that of what would later be understood as the Han Chinese ethnic group.[32] On the empire's frontiers were diverse groups with cultures foreign to the Qin; even areas under the control of the Qin military remained culturally distinct.[23]

The Qin aristocracy were largely similar to the Zhou in culture and daily life, with regional variation generally considered a symbol of the lower classes - and ultimately as contrary to the unification that the government strove to achieve.[33]

Commoners and rural villagers, who comprised more than 90% of the population,[34] rarely left the villages or farmsteads where they were born. While various other forms of employment existed depending on the region, as with other settled peoples in antiquity the overwhelming majority of people throughout Qin were engaged predominately in agriculture.[35] Other professions were hereditary; a father's employment was passed to his eldest son after he died.[36] The Lüshi Chunqiu (c. 239 BC) - a text named for Lü Buwei, the prime minister who sponsored it - gave examples of how, when commoners are obsessed with material wealth, instead of the idealism of a man who "makes things serve him", they were "reduced to the service of things".[37]

### Agriculture

[edit]

Qin agriculture was mainly based on cereal cultivation, with millet, wheat, and barley being the staple crops that comprised most of peasants' diets. The amount of land available for use as pasture was limited, with livestock raised mostly for household use of byproducts like milk.[38] Consumption of meat was generally restricted to the wealthy.[39] The state of Qin under Shang Yang pioneered a policy of maximising the area of land under cultivation, resulting in states clearing most of the forest in the Yellow River valley and converting it into farmland. This land was divided into household-sized allotments, and inhabitants were forcibly relocated to work them. Another emphasis of Shang Yang's agricultural policy was the use of hoes to weed the soil, which improved its ability to retain moisture and provide nutrients to crops.[40]

### Religion

[edit]

The predominant form of religious belief in China during the early imperial period focused on shen (roughly meaning 'spirits'), yin (陰; 阴; 'shadows'), and the realm they were understood to inhabit. Spirits were classified as one of three types: 'human dead' (人鬼; rénguǐ), 'heavenly spirits' (天神; tiānshén) such as Shangdi, and 'earthly spirits' (地示; dìshì) corresponding to natural features like mountains and rivers.[41] The spirit world was believed to be parallel to the earthly one: animal sacrifices were offered in order to make contact with it, and the spirits of people were thought to move there upon death. In general, ritual served two purposes: to receive blessings from the spirit realm, and to ensure the dead journeyed to and stayed there.[42]

A ritual concept introduced under the Qin that would be continued by the Han was the official touring of ritual sites across the realm by the emperor, which served to reinforce notions of the emperor as a semi-divine figure.[43]

The Qin also practised forms of divination - including that previously used by the Shang, where bones and turtle shells were heated in order to divine knowledge of the future from the cracks that formed. Observation of astronomical and weather phenomena were also common, with comets, eclipses, and droughts commonly considered omens.[44]

## Government and military

[edit]

Terracotta Army at the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang museum Warriors and horse from the Terracotta Army

The Qin government was highly bureaucratic, and was administered by a hierarchy of officials serving the emperor. The Qin put into practice the teachings of Han Fei, allowing the state to administer all of its territories, including those recently conquered. All aspects of life were standardised, from measurements and language to more practical details, such as the length of chariot axles.[45]

The empire was divided into 36 commanderies, which were further subdivided into more than 1000 districts.[46] The states made by the emperor were assigned to officials dedicated to the task rather than placing the burden on people from the royal family. Zheng and his advisors also introduced new laws and practices that ended aristocratic rule in China, fully replacing it with a centralised, bureaucratic government. A supervisory system, the Censorate was introduced to monitor and check the powers of administrators and officials at each level of government.[47] The Qin instituted a permanent system of ranks and rewards, consisting of twenty ranks based on the number of enemies killed in battle or commanding victorious units. Ranks were not hereditary unless a soldier died heroically in battle, whereby the soldier's rank will be inherited by his family. Each rank was assigned a specific allotment of dwellings, slaves and land, and ranks could be used to remit judicial punishments.[48]

Instances of abuse were recorded. In one example from the Records of Officialdom, a commander named Hu ordered his men to attack peasants in an attempt to increase the number of "bandits" he had killed; his superiors, likely eager to inflate their records as well, allowed this.[49]

### Economy

[edit]

The Qin conception of political economy reflected the ideas of Shang Yang and Li Kui: labour was identified as the realm's primary resource, and commerce was understood in general to be "inherently sterile".[50] The merchant class that had emerged during the Warring States period was considered a direct threat to the state, due to merchants' incentives to pursue individual profits and self-aggrandisement. After unification, the imperial state targeted their wealth and political power; a 214 BC law allowed for merchants to be impressed into the military and deported for service on the realm's frontiers. Reinforced by its distinct legal status, the merchant profession became increasingly hereditary in nature.[51]

Qin-era banliang coin, with the obverse marked 半两 (bànliǎng)

During the 330s BC, the state of Qin began minting banliang coins, which were round, made mostly of bronze, and marked to indicate a nominal weight of around 8 g (5⁄16 oz) - though the actual weight varied in reality. After unification, banliang were given official status across the empire, replacing previous regional currencies like spade money and knife money to become the first standardised currency used throughout all of China.[52] Unlike the Han, who initially continued the use of banliang, the Qin did not allow additional coins to be minted by the private sector, and considered those that were to be counterfeit.[53]

### Construction projects

[edit]

Qin Shi Huang developed plans to fortify Qin's northern border, to protect against nomadic invasions. The resulting construction formed the base of what later became the Great Wall of China, which joined and strengthened the walls made by feudal lords. Another project built during his rule was the Terracotta Army, intended to protect the emperor after his death.[54] The Terracotta Army was inconspicuous due to its underground location, and was not discovered until 1974.[29]

### Registration system

[edit]

> 四境之內，丈夫女子皆有名於上
>  Everywhere within the borders, let all men and women be registered by name with the government

>  生者著，死者削
>  Those who are born shall be entered, and those who die, expunged

—The Book of Lord Shang[55]

During the 4th century BC, the state of Qin introduced a registration system for its population, which initially collated the names of individuals, and later began keeping track of entire households. The system, unique in its scope among Qin's contemporaries, is thought to have been established in 375 BC. It was expanded later in the century at the direction of Shang Yang, with passages of The Book of Lord Shang referencing the system likely reflecting the words of Shang Yang himself. The oldest lists to be discovered, excavated at Shuihudi in Hubei and Liye in Hunan, date to the late 3rd century BC.[56] Adapting a concept originally used within the military to society at-large, Qin households were organised into 'groups of five' (五; wǔ), wherein the heads of each household were made mutually responsible for reporting any wrongdoing committed by other members of the group.[57] Under the orders of King Ying Zheng, the state began recording the ages of adult men in 231 BC.[58]

### Writing reform

[edit]

"Qin" in seal script (top) and regular script (bottom) Chinese characters

The Zhou inherited the writing system of Chinese characters used by the preceding Shang dynasty (c. 1600 – c. 1056 BC) and first attested in oracle bone inscriptions c. 1250 BC. Writing was adopted throughout the Zhou cultural sphere during the first half of the 1st millennium BC, with the shapes and forms of characters in the script gradually evolving over time. With the Warring States period, distinct regional writing styles began to diverge from one another;[59] compared to that of other Zhou states, the script used in Qin generally changed the least during this time.[60] The standard writing style in the state of Qin was consolidated under Qin Shi Huang into what is known as small seal script.[61] While the Book of Han (111 AD) states that Li Si distributed detailed instructions for writing in small seal script to scribes in 221 BC, these instructions have been lost. However, many contemporary inscriptions on monuments meant to demonstrate small seal character forms have survived.[62] While the regional divergences across China were reduced considerably, the use of variant characters remained frequent among Qin scribes; the traditional idea of a strict standardisation of small seal script appears to be a later notion introduced by the Han.[63]

### Penal policy

[edit]

Qin law was primarily administrative,[64] and like most ancient societies, the early imperial Chinese state did not have separate structures of administration and jurisprudence.[65] Articulated alongside ritual practice,[66] Qin penal practice included concepts such as intent, defendant rights, judicial procedure, requests for retrials, and the distinction between common and statutory law.[67] Comparative model manuals guided penal legal procedures based on real-life situations, with publicly named wrongs linked to punishments.[68]

Shang Yang's code likely drew on Li Kui's Canon of Laws, which considered dealing with thieves and robbers the most urgent legal matter of its time. The Qin dynasty's penal code primarily focuses on theft, though there were certain statutes dealing specifically with infanticide and other unsanctioned harm against children.[69] However, in the period prior to unification, Qin laws had already diverged significantly from ideas espoused in The Book of Lord Shang.[70]

While retaining Shang Yang's reforms, the Qin abandoned his anti-Confucianism and strict, harsh penal policy, and ultimately his heavy emphasis on agriculture. After Shang Yang, the Lushi Chunqiu attests King Huiwen of Qin as having pardoned the death penalty in a case involving murder, based on Confucianistic ethics.[71][72] Anti-Confucianistic statements in the Book of Lord Shang are isolated to the early chapters 3, 4 and 11.[73] Though not completely eliminated, recovered Qin dynasty law does not emphasize group responsibility as was more common in Shang Yang's time. Mutilating group punishment was directed against more extreme cases of group robbery by policing officials themselves, while petty levels of theft committed by individual commoners was punished with a month's labor service.[74]

Sima Qian depicts Qin Shi Huang as emphasising law and order, praising himself as a "sage ruler of benevolence and righteousness ... who cares for and pities the common people".[75] While generally considered harsh by modern standards, Qin punishments were "not extraordinarily severe for their time".[76] Though including mutilating punishments, recovered Qin law only mentioned nose cutting or foot amputation three of four times.[clarification needed] Heavy punishment most frequently consisted of hard labour. Those sentenced to hard labour generally performed public works inside the country, mainly in road and canal construction.[77]

Punishment often went unenforced. Criminals were sometimes given amnesties, only incurring punishment upon recidivism, and were often pardoned in exchange for fines, labour, or a demotion in aristocratic rank, even for capital offences. While The Book of Lord Shang recommended harsh punishments, it also "laments" insufficient population for its territories, and the Qin attempted to limit emigration out of the country. Rather than physically punish criminals, they were frequently resettled in frontier colonies. Those sentenced to hard labour were sometimes sent to join frontier defences if given amnesty. Men in the colonies sentenced to death were then recruited for expeditionary armies.[78]

The Han-era writer Dong Zhongshu (179–104 BC) considered Qin officials and taxes severe, but did not characterise punishments as such; in fact, Dong criticised the Qin system for its inability to punish criminals;[79] though exile as a heavy punishment in China dates to at least the Spring and Autumn period.[80]

## Legacy

[edit]

The Qin, despite existing for only 14 years, are credited with inaugurating the Chinese imperial system, which would persist in some form throughout Chinese history until it was ultimately overthrown by the Xinhai Revolution in 1911.[81]

During the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, Han dynasty scholars began portraying the Qin as a monolithic, legalist tyranny, often invoked as an example of bad governance in contemporary debates about imperial policy.[82] In particular, purges in 213 and 212 BC collectively known as the burning of books and burying of scholars are frequently cited to this end; however, the earliest account of these events is contained in the Shiji (c. 91 BC), and its veracity is disputed by some modern scholars.[83] The Qin were deliberately contrasted with what was characterised as the virtuous rule of the Han.[84] However, the Han essentially inherited the administrative state built by the Qin, including the household registration system.[55] Owing to this continuity, medieval and modern historians have often grouped the Qin and Han together,[85] with the establishment of the Han treated "mainly as a change in ruling houses rather than a system or method of rule".[81]

### Etymology of China

[edit]

-210

GRECO
BACTRIANS

PAR-
THIA

Pazyryk
culture

SAKAS

Tagar
culture

Sagly
culture

Shule

Khotan

DONGHU

SABEANS

Ordos
culture

Dian
culture

JIN

YUEZHI

Subeshi

Wusun

SELEUCID
EMPIRE

MAURYA
EMPIRE

QIN
DYNASTY

XIONGNU

PTOLE-
MIES

MEROË

Scythians

Sarmatians

class=notpageimage|

Qin alongside the other major polities of Asia in 221 BC, with the capital Xianyang marked with a red dot[86]

Qin is the likeliest origin for the modern name China and its equivalents in many European languages. The term likely first appeared in the Indo-Aryan languages, attested in Sanskrit as both Cina and Sina, and subsequently entered Greek as Thinai or Sinai. From there it entered the vernacular languages of Europe, e.g. as China in English and Chine in French. This etymology is questioned by some scholars, who suggest that Sina appears in Sanskrit centuries before the Qin dynasty's founding. Other hypothesised origins include the Zhou-era state of Jin that existed prior to the 4th century BC,[87] and Jing (荆), another name for the state of Chu.[88]

## Sovereigns

[edit]

See also: Qin (state) § Rulers

An edict in bronze from the reign of Qin Er Shi No. | Posthumous name | Personal name | Reign

|
|
|

1  | Shi Huangdi | Zheng (政)  | 221–210 BC
2  | Er Shi Huangdi | Huhai (胡亥) | 210–207 BC
3  | —  | Ziying (子嬰)  | 207 BC

### Imperial family tree

[edit]

Qin dynasty

| | | | | See Family tree of Qin

|
|
|
|

| | | | | |
| | | | Zheng 政
259–210 BC

* * *

King of Qin 秦王
r. 247–221 BC

* * *

Qin Shi Huang 秦始皇
r. 221–210 BC
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
1| | | | | | 18 or 25 (disputed)
Fusu 扶蘇
d. 210 BC| | | | | | Huhai 胡亥
229–207 BC

* * *

Qin Er Shi 秦二世
r. 210–207 BC
| |
Ziying 子嬰
d. 206 BC

* * *

King of Qin
r. 207 BC

## Notes

[edit]

1. ^ Per Brian Lander: "While most maps of the Qin Empire depict the south as solidly Qin territory, in fact Qin only had administrative control over a few areas south of the Yangzi River, most notably the lowlands of the central Yangzi valley that it had conquered from Chu. Across the vast regions south of the Yangzi—most of which were hilly and densely forested—Qin controlled nothing more than a scattered network of garrisons connected by river and land routes. In retrospect, Qin's penetration of the far south was a key event in the Chinese colonization of what is now South China, but it was a minor concern of the Qin rulers."[1]
2. ^ The inscription reads: 海内皆臣、歲登成熟、道毋飢人.
3. ^ Qin Shi Huang stated that the dynasty would last 10,000 generations; it lasted less than 15 years.[29]

## References

[edit]

### Citations

[edit]

1. ^ Lander 2021, p. 158.
2. ^ Taagepera 1979, p. 121.
3. ^ "Qin". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins.
4. ^ Li 2013, p. 6.
5. ^ a b Lewis 2007, p. 17.
6. ^ Li 2006, pp. 262–264, 273–276.
7. ^ Shen 2018, p. 117.
8. ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 17–18.
9. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 88.
10. ^ Morton 1995, p. 45.
11. ^ Lander 2021, p. 115.
12. ^ a b Kinney & Hardy 2005, p. 10.
13. ^ a b Lewis 2007, pp. 18–19.
14. ^ Morton 1995, pp. 26, 45.
15. ^ Bodde 1967, p. 3.
16. ^ Morton 1995, p. 25.
17. ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 38–39.
18. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 10.
19. ^ a b Bo 2008, pp. 134–135.
20. ^ a b Loewe 2007.
21. ^ a b Morton 1995, p. 47.
22. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 129.
23. ^ a b Lewis 2007, p. 5.
24. ^ Bodde 1986, p. 45.
25. ^ Sanft 2018, p. 155.
26. ^ a b Kinney & Hardy 2005, pp. 13–15.
27. ^ Sanft 2018, pp. 157–158.
28. ^ Bodde 1986, p. 84.
29. ^ a b Morton 1995, p. 49.
30. ^ Leung 2018, p. 163.
31. ^ Morton 1995, pp. 49–50.
32. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 128.
33. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 11.
34. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 102.
35. ^ von Falkenhausen 2022, p. 16.
36. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 15.
37. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 16.
38. ^ Sterckx 2018, pp. 306–308.
39. ^ Sterckx 2018, p. 301.
40. ^ Hara 2022, pp. 69–71.
41. ^ Guo 2018, p. 242.
42. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 186.
43. ^ Tavor 2018, p. 273.
44. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 181.
45. ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 53–54.
46. ^ Lewis 2007, p. 18.
47. ^ Xue & Qi 2019, p. 415.
48. ^ Hui 2005, p. 81.
49. ^ Chen & Wu 2007, pp. 180–181.
50. ^ von Glahn 2022, p. 182.
51. ^ von Glahn 2022, pp. 175, 182–183.
52. ^ Kakinuma 2022, pp. 132–133.
53. ^ Kakinuma 2022, p. 133.
54. ^ Li 2013, pp. 255–256.
55. ^ a b Sanft 2014, p. 127.
56. ^ Sanft 2014, pp. 127–128.
57. ^ Barbieri-Low & Yates 2015, pp. 111–112; Sanft 2014, pp. 127–129.
58. ^ Sanft 2014, p. 129.
59. ^ Qiu 1988, pp. 70–71.
60. ^ Qiu 1988, p. 78.
61. ^ Qiu 1988, p. 100.
62. ^ Bökset 2006, pp. 17, 19.
63. ^ Galambos 2004, pp. 181–182; Bökset 2006, pp. 18–19.
64. ^ Hulsewé 1986, p. 539; Bodde 1986, p. 60.
65. ^ Hulsewé 1986, p. 528.
66. ^ Cheng 2008, p. 208.
67. ^ Goldin 2005, pp. 5–6.
68. ^ Wilkinson 2015, p. 307; Cheng 2008, p. 208.
69. ^ Wang 2024, p. 588.
70. ^ Wilkinson 2015, p. 307.
71. ^ Pines 2023.
72. ^ Jiang 2021, p. 213; Hsiao 1979, p. 470.
73. ^ Pines 2024, p. 29.
74. ^ Bodde 1986, p. 50; Hansen 1992, p. 347, 350, 357–359, 369 sfnm error: no target: CITEREFHansen1992 (help).
75. ^ Watson 1962, p. 174.
76. ^ Goldin 2005, p. 5.
77. ^ Hulsewé 1986, p. 50,533.
78. ^ Pines 2014, pp. 21, 213; Hulsewé 1986, pp. 533–535.
79. ^ Loewe 2011, pp. 93–94.
80. ^ Lewis 1999, p. 19.
81. ^ a b Sanft 2018, p. 159.
82. ^ Xiong & Hammond 2019, p. 7; Pines 2014, p. 231.
83. ^ Korolkov 2022, p. 11; Sanft 2019, p. 21.
84. ^ Sanft 2019, p. 21; Pines 2014, pp. 231–232.
85. ^ Korolkov 2022, p. 170.
86. ^

* Coatsworth, John; Cole, Juan; Hanagan, Michael P.; Perdue, Peter C.; Tilly, Charles; Tilly, Louise (2015). Global Connections. Vol. 1, To 1500: Politics, Exchange, and Social Life in World History. Cambridge University Press. p. 138\. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139047913. ISBN 978-1-316-29777-3 - via Google Books.
* O'Brien, Patrick Karl; et al., eds. (2007) [2002]. Atlas of World History (concise ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 51\. ISBN 978-0-19-521921-0. OL 3671170M.
* Van den Bosch, Jeroen; Fauve, Adrien; De Cordier, B. J., eds. (2021). European Handbook of Central Asian Studies. Ibidem. p. 403\. ISBN 978-3-8382-1518-1 - via Google Books.

87. ^ Keay 2009, p. 98.
88. ^ Wade 2009, p. 19: "This thesis also helps explain the existence of Cīna in the Indic Laws of Manu and the Mahabharata, likely dating well before Qin Shihuangdi".

### Works cited

[edit]

* Barbieri-Low, Anthony J.; Yates, Robin D. S. (2015). Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 126\. Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004300538. ISBN 978-90-04-30053-8.
* Bo, Yang (2008). 中国帝王皇后亲王公主世系录 [Records of the Genealogy of Chinese Emperors, Empresses, and Their Descendants] (in Chinese). Vol. 1\. Taiyuan: Zhongguo youyi chubangongsi.
* Bodde, Derk (1967) [1938]. China's First Unifier: A Study of the Chʻin Dynasty as Seen in the Life of Li Ssŭ 李斯 280?–208 B.C. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 3\. Brill. OL 5588381M.
* Translated from Sima Qian; Sima Tan (1739) [90s BC]. "44: hereditary house of Wei". Shiji 史記 [Records of the Grand Historian] (in Literary Chinese) (punctuated ed.). Beijing: Imperial Household Department.

* Bökset, Roar (2006). Long Story of Short Forms: The Evolution of Simplified Chinese Characters (PDF). Stockholm East Asian Monographs. Vol. 11\. Stockholm University. ISBN 978-91-628-6832-1.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
* Chen, Guidi; Wu, Chuntao (2007). Will the Boat Sink the Water?: The Life of China's Peasants. Translated by Zhu, Hong. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-441-5 - via Google Books.
* Cheng, Chung-ying (2008). "The Yi-jing and Yin-Yang way of thinking". In Mou, Bo (ed.). The Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-24937-4.
* Galambos, Imre (2004). "The Myth of the Qin Unification of Writing in Han Sources" (PDF). Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 57 (2): 181–203\. doi:10.1556/AOrient.57.2004.2.2. ISSN 0001-6446. JSTOR 23658631.
* Goldin, Paul R. (2005). After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. University of Hawaiʻi Press. doi:10.26530/oapen_625891. ISBN 978-0-8248-2842-4.
* 

, ed. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Early Chinese History. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-77591-6.
* Guo, Jue. "The spirit world". In Goldin (2018), pp. 229–260.
* Leung, Vincent S. "The former Han empire". In Goldin (2018), pp. 160–179.
* Sanft, Charles. "The Qin dynasty". In Goldin (2018), pp. 146–159.
* Shen, Chen. "The age of territorial lords". In Goldin (2018), pp. 108–145.
* Tavor, Ori. "Religious thought". In Goldin (2018), pp. 261–279.
* Sterckx, Roel. "Food and agriculture". In Goldin (2018), pp. 300–318.
* Hsiao, Kung-chuan (1979). A History of Chinese Political Thought. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-691-61289-8.
* Hui, Victoria Tin-bor (2005). War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614545.002. ISBN 978-1-139-44356-2.
* Jiang, Tao (2021). Origins of Moral-political Philosophy in Early China. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-760347-5 - via Google Books.
* Keay, John (2009). China: A History. Harper. ISBN 978-0-00-722178-3.
* Kinney, Anne Behnke; Hardy, Grant (2005). The Establishment of the Han Empire and Imperial China. Westport, CT: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-32588-5.
* Korolkov, Maxim (2022). The Imperial Network in Ancient China: The Foundation of Sinitic Empire in Southern East Asia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-367-65428-3.
* Lander, Brian (2021). The King's Harvest: A Political Ecology of China from the First Farmers to the First Empire. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-25508-9.
* Lewis, Mark Edward (1999). Writing and Authority in Early China. State University of New York Press. doi:10.1353/pew.2001.0006. ISBN 978-0-7914-4114-5.
* 

 (2007). The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. London: Belknap. ISBN 978-0-674-02477-9.
* Li, Feng (2006). "The eastward migration: reconfiguring the Western Zhou state". Landscape and Power in Early China: The Crisis and Fall of the Western Zhou 1045–771 BC. Cambridge University Press. pp. 233–278\. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489655.010. ISBN 978-0-521-85272-2.
* 

 (2013). Early China: A Social and Cultural History. New Approaches to Asian History. Vol. 12\. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139034395. ISBN 978-0-521-89552-1.
* Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L., eds. (1999). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8.
* ———. "The heritage left to the empires". In Loewe & Shaughnessy (1999), pp. 967–1032. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521470308.016
* 

 (9 September 2007). "China's First Empire". History Today. Vol. 57, no. 9\. ISSN 0018-2753. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
* 

 (2011). Dong Zhongshu, a 'Confucian' Heritage and the Chunqiu fanlu. China Studies. Vol. 20\. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004194656.i-370.15. ISBN 978-90-04-21486-6.
* Ma, Debin; von Glahn, Richard, eds. (2022). The Cambridge Economic History of China. Vol. 1: To 1800. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108587334. ISBN 978-1-108-42557-5.
* Hara, Motoko. "Agriculture and its environmental impact". In Ma & von Glahn (2022), pp. 52–91.
* Kakinuma, Yōhei. "Money, markets, and merchants". In Ma & von Glahn (2022), pp. 131–165.
* von Falkenhausen, Lothar. "The economy of late pre-imperial China". In Ma & von Glahn (2022), pp. 15–51.
* von Glahn, Richard. "Economic philosophy and political economy". In Ma & von Glahn (2022), pp. 166–202.
* Morton, W. Scott (1995). China: Its History and Culture (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-043424-0. OL 9250588M.
* Pines, Yuri; Shelach-Lavi, Gideon; Falkenhausen, Lothar von; Yates, Robin D. S., eds. (2014). Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited. New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society. Vol. 5\. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-28974-1 - via eScholarship.`{{cite book}}`: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
* 

 (Summer 2023). "Legalism in Chinese Philosophy". In Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
* 

, ed. (2024). Dao Companion to China's fa Tradition. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy. Vol. 19\. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-53629-8. ISSN 2211-0275.
* Wang, Pei. "Laozi, Huang-Lao and the fa tradition: thinking through the term xingming 刑名". In Pines (2024), pp. 575–594.
* Qiu, Xigui (2000) [1988]. Chinese Writing. Early China Special Monograph Series. Vol. 4\. Translated by Mattos, Gilbert L.; Norman, Jerry. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China, University of California. ISBN 978-1-55729-071-7.
* Sanft, Charles (2014) [2013]. Communication and Cooperation in Early Imperial China: Publicizing the Qin Dynasty. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-5037-7.
* Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 121. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959.
* Twitchett, Dennis; Loewe, Michael, eds. (1986). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 1: The Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 BC–AD 220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243278. ISBN 978-0-521-24327-8.
* Bodde, Derk. "The state and empire of Chʻin". In Cambridge History of China (1986), pp. 20–102.
* Hulsewé, A. F. P. "Chʻin and Han law". In Cambridge History of China (1986), pp. 520–544.
* Wade, Geoff (May 2009). "The Polity of Yelang (夜郎) and the Origin of the Name 'China'" (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers. 188. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2011. Retrieved 4 October 2011.
* Wilkinson, Endymion, ed. (2015). Chinese History A New Manual. Harvard. ISBN 978-0-674-08846-7.
* Xiong, Victor Cunrui; Hammond, Kenneth James, eds. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Imperial Chinese History. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-84728-6.
* Sanft, Charles. "The Qin dynasty (221–206 BCE)". In Xiong & Hammond (2019), pp. 12–24.
* Watson, Burton (1962). Early Chinese Literature. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-08671-4. `{{cite book}}`: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
* Xue, Deshu; Qi, Xiuqian (May 2019). "Research on Supervision System in Ancient China and Its Contemporary Reference". Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 319 (79): 414–419\. doi:10.2991/ichssr-19.2019.79. ISSN 2352-5398.

## Further reading

[edit]

* Ivanhoe, Philip J.; Van Norden, Bryan W., eds. (2005). Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Hackett. ISBN 978-0-87220-780-6 - via Google Books.
* Pines, Yuri (2009). Envisioning Eternal Empire. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3275-9.
* 

 (2017). "Confucius' Elitism: The Concepts of junzi and xiaoren Revisited". In Goldin, Paul R. (ed.). A Concise Companion to Confucius. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Vol. 65\. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 164–184\. doi:10.1002/9781118783863.ch8. ISBN 978-1-118-78387-0.

## External links

[edit]

* Media related to Qin Dynasty at Wikimedia Commons

Preceded by

Zhou dynasty

|  Dynasties in Chinese history
221–207 BC  | Succeeded by

Han dynasty

|
|

* v
* t
* e

Qin dynasty topics

History|

* Qin Shi Huang
* Qin's wars of unification
* Qin's campaign against the Xiongnu
* Qin's campaign against the Yue tribes
* Burning of books and burying of scholars
* Chen Sheng and Wu Guang uprising
* Battle of Julu

See also|

* Epang Palace
* The Faults of Qin
* Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang
* The Acrobats
* Terracotta Army
* Mr. He's jade
* Shuihudi Qin bamboo texts
* Twelve Metal Colossi
* Xianyang

* v
* t
* e

Empires

Ancient
(colonies)|

* Akkadian
* Armenian
* Urartu
* Orontid
* Ancient
* Assyrian
* Middle Assyrian
* Neo-Assyrian
* Babylonian
* Old Babylonian
* Kassite
* Neo-Babylonian
* Chinese
* Qin
* Han
* Jin
* Dʿmt
* Egyptian
* Old Kingdom
* Middle Kingdom
* New Kingdom
* Goguryeo
* Harsha
* Hellenistic
* Macedonian
* Seleucid
* Ptolemaic
* Bactrian
* Indo-Greek
* Hittite
* Hunnic
* White
* Xiongnu
* Iranian
* Median
* Achaemenid
* Parthian
* Sasanian
* Kush
* Kushan
* Magadha
* Haryanka
* Shaishunaga
* Nanda
* Maurya
* Shunga
* Gupta
* Phoenician
* Carthaginian
* Roman
* Western
* Eastern
* Satavahana
* Neo-Sumerian
* Xianbei
* Rouran

Post-classical|

* Angevin
* Aragonese
* Armenian
* Bagratid
* Vaspurakan
* Artsakh
* Cilician
* Zakarid
* Ayyubid
* Aztec
* Benin
* Bornu
* Bruneian
* Bulgarian
* First
* Second
* Burmese
* First
* Calakmul
* Caliphate
* Rashidun
* Umayyad
* Abbasid
* Fatimid
* Chalukya
* Western
* Eastern
* Chinese
* Sui
* Tang
* Liao
* Song
* Jīn
* Yuan
* Chola
* Ethiopian
* Aksum
* Zagwe
* Solomonic
* Genoese
* Georgian
* Huetar
* Inca
* Kannauj
* Pala
* Gurjara-Pratihara
* Rashtrakuta
* Iranian
* Tahirid
* Saffarid
* Samanid
* Buyid
* Japanese
* Yamato
* Kamakura
* Muromachi
* Edo
* Kanem
* Khmer
* Latin
* Lithuanian
* Grand Duchy
* Commonwealth
* Majapahit
* Mali
* Mongol
* Yuan
* Golden Horde
* Chagatai Khanate
* Ilkhanate
* Berber
* Almoravid
* Almohad
* Norwegian
* North Sea
* Oyo
* Polish
* Kingdom
* Commonwealth
* Roman
* Byzantine
* Nicaea
* Thessalonica
* Trebizond
* Epirus
* Morea
* Romano-Germanic
* Carolingian
* Holy Roman
* Serbian
* Singhasari
* Songhai
* Srivijaya
* Tibetan
* Tikal
* Tiwanaku
* Toltec
* Turco-Persian
* Ghaznavid
* Great Seljuk
* Khwarezmian
* Timurid
* Turkic
* First
* Western
* Eastern
* Second
* Türgesh
* Uighur
* Kyrgyz
* Venetian
* Vietnamese
* Dinh
* Early Le
* Ly
* Tran
* Ho
* Later Tran
* Later Le
* Vijayanagara
* Wagadou
* Wari

Modern|

* Afghan
* Ashanti
* Austro-Hungarian
* Brazilian
* Burmese
* Second
* Third
* Central African
* Chinese
* Ming
* Qing
* China
* Manchukuo
* Contemporary
* Ethiopian
* Haitian
* First
* Second
* French
* First
* Second
* German
* German Empire
* Nazi Germany
* Indian
* Indo-Persian
* Mughal
* Sikh
* Iranian
* Safavid
* Afsharid
* Zand
* Qajar
* Pahlavi
* Japanese
* Korean
* Maratha
* Mexican
* First
* Second
* Mongol
* Oirat
* Khoshut
* Dzungar
* Kalmyk
* Bogd
* Moroccan
* Saadi
* 'Alawi
* Polish
* Russian
* Tsarist
* Imperial
* Contemporary
* Sokoto
* Somali
* Isaaq
* Warsengeli
* Ajuran
* Geledi
* Swedish
* Tongan
* Vietnamese
* Mạc
* Revival Lê
* Tay Sơn
* Dainam
* Vietnam

| Colonial|

* American
* Austrian
* attempts
* Belgian
* British
* English
* Scottish
* Chinese
* Danish
* Dutch
* French
* German
* attempts
* Italian
* Venetian
* Genoese
* Maltese
* attempts
* Japanese
* Mongol
* Norwegian
* Omani
* Ottoman
* Polish–Lithuanian
* Couronian
* attempts
* Portuguese
* Russian
* Spanish
* Catalan-Aragonese
* Basque
* Swedish

|

Lists|

* Empires
* largest
* Ancient great powers
* Medieval great powers
* Modern great powers
* European colonialism
* African empires

Miscellaneous|

* Academic
* Anti-imperialism
* Cultural
* Ecological
* Green
* Media
* Liberal
* Linguistic
* Social
* Soviet
* Theories
* U.S.

Portals:

* China
* History

Authority control databases

International|

* VIAF

National|

* Germany
* United States
* Israel

Other|

* Yale LUX

*[c.]: circa
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template