Skylab Rescue

Unflown spaceflight contingency plan

Skylab Rescue

Skylab Rescue Command Module Diagram

Mission type| Crew rescue
Operator| NASA
Spacecraft properties
Spacecraft| Apollo CSM-119
Manufacturer| North American Aviation
Crew
Crew size| 2 at launch
5 at landing
Members| Vance D. Brand
Don L. Lind
Start of mission
Launch date| On standby
August 1973 - February 1974
(Unlaunched)
Rocket| Saturn IB AS-208/209
Launch site| Kennedy LC-39B
Docking with Skylab
Docking port| Forward

Skylab rescue crew portrait (Left to right; Vance Brand and Don Lind)

The Skylab Rescue Mission (also SL-R)[1]: iii was an unflown rescue mission, planned as a contingency in the event of astronauts being stranded aboard the American Skylab space station.[2][3] If flown, it would have used a modified Apollo Command Module that could be launched with a crew of two and return a crew of five.[1]: 1–1 [4]

Astronauts Vance Brand and Don Lind were assigned as the rescue crew, in the event of the mission's necessity. A rescue mission was considered when the Skylab 3 Command/Service Module (CSM) developed problems in its reaction control system (RCS) thrusters while docked to the station. On the ground, space vehicles were assembled to fly rescue missions in support of both Skylab 3 and Skylab 4. However, no rescue mission ever proved necessary. All astronauts visiting Skylab returned safely to Earth in their original command modules.

## History

[edit]

Plans for outfitting an Apollo Command/Service Module (CSM) as a space rescue vehicle date back to November 1965 when North American Rockwell technicians conceived the possibility of a rescue mission for astronauts trapped in lunar orbit.[5][6] After a rescue mission in Earth orbit was depicted in the 1969 film Marooned, the company revived the concept in November 1970.[2] Marshall Space Flight Center issued a formal Mission Requirements document on 17 May 1972, with subsequent revisions.[1]: iii

Skylab 3 astronauts Alan Bean and Jack Lousma helped design the "field modification kit" to use a standard CSM for rescue, and would have flown the CSM for their mission to rescue Skylab 2 if necessary.[7] The standard Skylab Command Module accommodated a crew of three with storage lockers on the aft bulkhead for resupply of experiment film and other equipment, as well as the return of exposed film, data tapes and experiment samples. To convert the standard CSM to a rescue vehicle, the storage lockers were removed and replaced with two crew couches to seat a total of five crewmen.[4] The biggest risk in a rescue was the three upper seats "stroking" or collapsing onto the two lower seats in a rough landing, but no stroking occurred in previous missions.[7]

### AS 208

[edit]

Soon after Skylab 3's launch the crew's CSM developed a problem with Quad B, one of its four reaction control system thrusters. On August 2, 1973, six days later, a snowstorm-like effect outside the station startled the crew during breakfast. What appeared to be "a real blizzard" was fuel leaking from Quad D, opposite from Quad B.[7] The malfunctions left two available quads, and while the spacecraft could operate with just one, the leaks posed a possible risk to other systems.[8]: 208 The fuel for all quads and the main service propulsion system (SPS) engine were from the same batch; if the SPS fuel was contaminated, the CSM might not be able to deorbit.[7]

NASA considered bringing the crew home immediately,[3] but because the astronauts were safe on the station with ample supplies and because plans for a rescue flight existed,[8]: 209 the mission continued while the Saturn IB rocket AS 208 with CSM 119[4] was assembled in the Vehicle Assembly Building at Launch Complex 39 for possible use. It was at one point rolled out to LC-39B.

NASA announced on August 4 that Skylab 3 and Skylab 4 backup crewmen Vance Brand and Don Lind would fly any rescue mission; they had immediately begun training for the flight once the second quad had failed on August 2. After engineers found that the leaks would not disable the spacecraft, the two men used simulators to test reentry using two quads. If ground personnel worked 24 hours a day and skipped some tests, the mission could launch on September 10,[3][9]: 299 and would last no more than five days.[1]: 2–6 [8]: 208–209 The astronauts would attempt to prepare Skylab for further use but returning experimental data and diagnosing the cause of the problem were more important,[1]: 2–1 with Lind choosing what would be brought back.[8]: 211 [10] Human urine and feces samples and Apollo Telescope Mount and other film were the priorities.[7] Although Skylab had two docking ports the primary one would be used if possible, jettisoning the Skylab crew's CSM if necessary.[1]: 2–2, 3, 8

While many within NASA believed that the rescue mission would occur, within hours of the failure of the second quad the agency canceled the rescue mission. Beyond NASA's conclusion that the failed quads would not disable the Skylab 3 CSM and the SPS fuel was uncontaminated, Brand and Lind had already shown during their training as backup Skylab crewmen that a reentry with failed quads was safe. They also devised a method to deorbit with the command module's attitude control system. Later joking that they were "very efficient but perfectly stupid, because we have literally worked ourselves out of the mission", Brand and Lind continued to train for a rescue mission, as well as for their backup roles,[8]: 209–211 [10][7] but the Skylab 3 crew was able to complete its full 59-day mission on the station and safely return to Earth using the two functional RCS thruster quads,[11]: 103–4 using the SPS engine once instead of twice as precaution.[7]

### AS 209

[edit]

The Skylab Rescue CSM is removed from its Saturn IB Launch vehicle in the Vehicle Assembly Building, following the successful recovery of Skylab 4.

After the Skylab 4 launch, another rescue flight was assembled as a backup contingency. The Saturn IB rocket AS 209 was assembled in the Vehicle Assembly Building at Launch Complex 39 for possible use. It also used the CSM 119 Command Module that was to be launched with Brand and Lind.

There were also plans for a short 20-day Skylab 5 flight that would use this backup CSM. The crew, likely consisting of Brand, Lind, and Skylab backup Science Pilot William B. Lenoir, would have performed some scientific research and closed out the station until the Space Shuttle was operational. However, the extension of Skylab 4 from fifty-six to eighty-four days obviated the need for the additional mission.

AS 209 and CSM 119 were later used as a backup to the ASTP mission. Both are now on display at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex. CSM 119 is located in the Apollo/Saturn V Center. The Saturn IB booster for AS 209 is currently located in the Visitor Complex's Rocket Garden. It is displayed horizontally, mated to an Apollo FVV (Facilities Verification Vehicle) which was formerly displayed at the VAB's Visitor Complex circa October 1968.

In 2007, after sitting untouched for over 30 years, NASA engineers used the command module for studies on the spacecraft's life-support adapter assembly[12] – the projecting aerodynamic fairing that allows oxygen, water, and electricity to flow from the Service Module to the Command Module. This was in support of the design and construction of a similar system on the new Orion spacecraft, which resembles the Skylab Rescue configuration.

## Crew

[edit]

Position | Astronaut

|

Commander  | Vance D. Brand
Command Module Pilot  | Don L. Lind

Brand and Lind were assigned as the rescue mission's crew, had it proven necessary. Although the rescue contingency was not flown, both astronauts made later spaceflights. Brand flew in 1975 as the Command Module Pilot of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project before commanding three Space Shuttle missions: STS-5 in 1982, STS-41-B in 1984, and STS-35 in 1990. Lind would wait another decade before he flew as a mission specialist on STS-51-B in 1985.

* CSM 119 on display at the Apollo/Saturn V Center

* AS 209 on display at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex

## See also

[edit]

* STS-3xx
* Soyuz 32, Soyuz 33, and Soyuz 34. The crew of Soyuz 32 boarded the Soviet Salyut 6 space station, taking up residence. It was planned that the crew which launched aboard Soyuz 32 would return to Earth using the Soyuz 33 spacecraft, while the crew launching with Soyuz 33 would visit briefly and return using the older Soyuz 32 spacecraft, the latter nearing the end of its design life. However, Soyuz 33 was unable to dock, endangering the cosmonauts aboard the station. As a contingency, the Soyuz 34 spacecraft was launched to the station without a crew aboard. The crew which had docked with Salyut 6 aboard Soyuz 32 returned safely to Earth via the Soyuz 34 spacecraft.

## References

[edit]

1. ^ a b c d e f " Mission Requirements, Skylab Rescue Mission, SL-R" NASA, 24 August 1973.
2. ^ a b Wade, Mark. "Skylab Rescue Archived 2005-09-06 at the Wayback Machine". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 2009-04-10.
3. ^ a b c "Skylab's New Crisis: A Rescue Mission?" TIME, August 13, 1973. Retrieved April 10, 2009.
4. ^ a b c Wade, Mark. "Apollo Rescue CSM Archived 2009-03-17 at the Wayback Machine". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved April 10, 2009.
5. ^ "4-Man Apollo Rescue Mission" Nasa Technical Reports Server. Retrieved April 18, 2011
6. ^ Portree, David S.F. (October 6, 2012). "Beyond Apollo: Apollo Lunar Orbit Rescue (1965)". Retrieved January 12, 2013.
7. ^ a b c d e f g Evans, Ben (2012-08-12). "Launch Minus Nine Days: The Space Rescue That Never Was". AmericaSpace. Retrieved 2020-07-09.
8. ^ a b c d e Shayler, David J. (2001). Skylab: America's Space Station. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 1-85233-407-X.
9. ^ Benson, Charles Dunlap and William David Compton. Living and Working in Space: A History of Skylab. NASA publication SP-4208.
10. ^ a b Don L. Lind oral history transcript, NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project, May 27, 2005.
11. ^ Belew, Leland. F. (editor) Skylab, Our First Space Station NASA publication SP-400.
12. ^ " Using History to Design the Future" NASA, retrieved March 9, 2011

## External links

[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Skylab Rescue.

* Skylab Rescue Space Vehicle Countdown
* Skylab Rescue Space Vehicle flight readiness test
* Skylab Rescue Space Vehicle OAT no. 1 plugs in test
* Launch vehicle test and checkout plan – Volume 2: Saturn 1B launch vehicle Skylab R (rescue) and AS-208 flow plan and listings
* Skylab hardware evaluation CSM rescue
* Structural analysis Skylab spacecraft. Addendum A: Rescue vehicle

* v
* t
* e

Skylab

Flights|

* Skylab 1 (uncrewed)
* Skylab 2
* Skylab 3
* Skylab 4

Astronauts|

| Skylab 2|

* Pete Conrad (Commander)
* Joseph Kerwin (Science Pilot)
* Paul Weitz (Pilot)

|

Skylab 3|

* Alan Bean (Commander)
* Owen Garriott (Science Pilot)
* Jack Lousma (Pilot)

Skylab 4|

* Gerald Carr (Commander)
* Edward Gibson (Science Pilot)
* William Pogue (Pilot)

Contingencies|

* Skylab B
* Teleoperator Retrieval System
* Skylab Rescue (not flown)
* Skylab 5

Skylab Rescue|

* Vance D. Brand (Commander)
* Don L. Lind (Pilot)

People|

* William C. Schneider (Program director)
* Jack Kinzler (Parasol fix designer)
* Raymond Loewy (Habitability consultant)

Related|

* Apollo Applications Program
* Apollo command and service module
* Apollo/Skylab spacesuit
* Beta cloth
* Thermal Micrometeoroid Garment
* Apollo Telescope Mount
* Crawler-transporter
* Manned Space Flight Network
* Skylab 4 human factors
* Skylab Medical Experiment Altitude Test (SMEAT)
* Wet workshop
* Searching for Skylab (2019 documentary)

* v
* t
* e

NASA

Policy and history|

| History
(creation)|

* NACA (1915)
* National Aeronautics and Space Act (1958)
* Space Task Group (1958)
* Paine (1986)
* Rogers (1986)
* Ride (1987)
* Space Exploration Initiative (1989)
* Augustine (1990)
* U.S. National Space Policy (1996)
* CFUSAI (2002)
* CAIB (2003)
* Vision for Space Exploration (2004)
* Aldridge (2004)
* Augustine (2009)

|

General|

* Space Race
* Administrator and Deputy Administrator
* Chief Scientist
* Astronaut Corps
* Ranks and positions
* Chief
* Budget
* NASA research
* spinoff technologies
* NASA+
* NASA TV
* NASA Social
* Launch Services Program
* Mercury Control Center
* Manned Space Flight Network
* Kennedy Space Center
* Vehicle Assembly Building
* Launch Complex 39
* Launch Complex 48
* Launch Control Center
* Operations and Checkout Building
* Johnson Space Center
* Mission Control
* Lunar Sample Laboratory
* Science Mission Directorate

Human spaceflight
programs|

| Past|

* X-15 (suborbital)
* Mercury
* Gemini
* Apollo
* Skylab
* Apollo–Soyuz (with the Soviet space program)
* Space Shuttle
* Shuttle–Mir (with Roscosmos State Corporation)
* Constellation

|

Current|

* International Space Station
* Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
* Commercial Crew
* Orion
* Artemis
* Lunar Gateway

Robotic programs|

| Past|

* Hitchhiker
* Mariner
* Mariner Mark II
* MESUR
* Mars Surveyor '98
* New Millennium
* Lunar Orbiter
* Pioneer
* Planetary Observer
* Ranger
* Surveyor
* Viking
* Project Prometheus
* Mars Exploration
* Mars Exploration Rover

|

Current|

* Living With a Star
* Lunar Precursor Robotic Program
* Earth Observing System
* Great Observatories program
* Explorers
* Voyager
* Discovery
* New Frontiers
* Solar Terrestrial Probes
* Commercial Lunar Payload Services
* SIMPLEx

Individual featured
missions
(human and robotic)|

| Past|

* Apollo 11
* COBE
* Mercury 3
* Mercury-Atlas 6
* Magellan
* Pioneer 10
* Pioneer 11
* Galileo
* timeline
* GALEX
* GRAIL
* WMAP
* Space Shuttle
* Spitzer Space Telescope
* Sojourner rover
* Spirit rover
* LADEE
* MESSENGER
* Aquarius
* Cassini
* Dawn
* Kepler space telescope
* Opportunity rover
* timeline
* observed
* RHESSI
* InSight
* Ingenuity helicopter
* flights

|

Currently
operating|

* Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
* 2001 Mars Odyssey
* New Horizons
* International Space Station
* Hubble Space Telescope
* Swift
* THEMIS
* Mars Exploration Rover
* Curiosity rover
* timeline
* GOES 14
* Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
* GOES 15
* Van Allen Probes
* Solar Dynamics Observatory
* Juno
* Mars Science Laboratory
* timeline
* NuSTAR
* Voyager 1
* Voyager 2
* WISE
* MAVEN
* MMS
* OSIRIS-REx
* Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
* Mars 2020
* Perseverance rover
* timeline
* James Webb Space Telescope
* timeline
* PACE

Future|

* Joint Polar Satellite System
* NISAR
* Europa Clipper
* Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

Communications
and navigation|

* Near Earth Network
* Space Network
* Deep Space Network (Goldstone
* Madrid
* Canberra
* Space Flight Operations Facility)
* Deep Space Atomic Clock

NASA lists|

* Astronauts
* by name
* by year
* Gemini astronauts
* Apollo astronauts
* Space Shuttle crews
* NASA aircraft
* NASA missions
* uncrewed missions
* Apollo missions
* Space Shuttle missions
* United States rockets
* NASA cancellations
* NASA cameras on spacecraft

NASA images
and artwork|

* Earthrise
* The Blue Marble
* Family Portrait
* Pale Blue Dot
* Pillars of Creation
* Mystic Mountain
* Solar System Family Portrait
* The Day the Earth Smiled
* Fallen Astronaut
* Deep fields
* Lunar plaques
* Pioneer plaques
* Voyager Golden Record
* Apollo 11 goodwill messages
* NASA insignia
* Gemini and Apollo medallions
* Mission patches
* Hubble Space Telescope anniversary images

Related|

* "We choose to go to the Moon"
* Apollo 8 Genesis reading
* Apollo 15 postal covers incident
* Space Mirror Memorial
* The Astronaut Monument
* Lunar sample displays
* Moon rocks
* stolen or missing
* U.S. Astronaut Hall of Fame
* Space program on U.S. stamps
* Apollo 17 Moon mice
* Moon tree
* Other primates in space
* NASA International Space Apps Challenge
* Astronauts Day
* National Astronaut Day
* Nikon NASA F4

* Category
* Commons

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template