Sponge city

Urban flood management concept

Sponge city

Simplified Chinese| 海绵城市
Traditional Chinese| 海綿城市
| Transcriptions

Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin| Hǎimián chéngshì
Gwoyeu Romatzyh| Haemian cherngshyh
Wade–Giles| Hai3-mien2 chʻêng2-shih4
Hakka
Romanization| Hói-mièn sàng-sṳ
Yue: Cantonese
Yale Romanization| Hóimìhn sìhngsíh
Jyutping| Hoi2min4 sing4si5

A sponge city (Chinese: 海绵城市) is a new urban planning model in China that emphasizes flood management via strengthening green infrastructures instead of purely relying on drainage systems, proposed by Chinese researchers in early 2000 and accepted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the State Council as nationwide urban construction policy in 2014.[1][2][3] The concept of sponge cities is that urban flooding, water shortage, and heat island effect can be alleviated by having more urban parks, gardens, green spaces, wetlands, nature strips, and permeable pavings, which will both improve ecological biodiversity for urban wildlife and reduce flash floods by serving as reservoirs for capturing, retaining, and absorbing excess storm water. Harvested rainwater can be repurposed for irrigation and treated for home use if needed. It is a form of a sustainable drainage system on an urban scale and beyond.

Sponge city policies are a set of nature-based solutions that use natural landscapes to catch, store and clean water; the concept has been inspired by ancient wisdom of adaptation to climate challenges, particularly in the monsoon regions in southeastern China.[4][5][6] According to Chinese authorities, "Sponge cities are part of a worldwide movement that goes by various names: 'green infrastructure' in Europe, 'low-impact development' in the United States, 'water-sensitive urban design' in Australia, 'natural infrastructure' in Peru, 'nature-based solutions' in Canada. In contrast to industrial management, in which people confine water with levees, channels and asphalt and rush it off the land as quickly as possible, these newer approaches seek to restore water's natural tendency to linger in places like wetlands and floodplains."[7]

## History

[edit]

The People's Republic of China adopted the Sponge City initiative, largely motivated by the failure of the conventional grey infrastructure of flood control and stormwater management systems, due to the persistent efforts by Chinese ecological urbanists through letters and proposals sent to high level Chinese authorities since early 2000.[8][9][10][11] Though the concept had been published and practiced since early 2000, it was the Beijing flood on July 21, 2012 which caused 79 deaths that prompted the top Chinese authorities to accept the Sponge City concept and make it a nationwide policy.[10][12][7] In 2015, China was reported to have initiated a pilot initiative in 16 districts.[13][14][15] This initiative presents an alternative to solve Asia's flood problems. China seeks to curb its flood with the initiative. The country plans for 80 percent of its urban cities to harvest and reuse 70 percent of rainwater. Building sponge cities does not necessary require huge investments. But such a fact has been widely misunderstood due to misleading media and the fact that the "sponge city" has been more than often misused by local government and contractors, as well as unprofessional designers as a fashionable brand and slogan which has actually nothing to do with this nature based solution.[16][17] The major obstacles of implementing the nature-based sponge city are the business-as-usual mentality of grey infrastructure engineering, ornamental gardening and conventional urban planning, as well as the code systems that have been established to defend these obsolete urbanism practices.[18] However, funding sponge cities has also been a challenge.[19][20]

After achieving success in China, the sponge city model has attracted over-exposed climate zones such as Dhaka and Kenya, as well as major cities like Berlin and Los Angeles.[21][22][23][24]

## Background

[edit]

People biking on flooded pavement in Foshan

Urbanization encourages the construction of city infrastructure. However, excessive utilization and development of water infrastructure can lead to water shortages, pollution, and overall degradation of water ecosystem services. Unscientific architectural planning also creates a large number of buildings, simultaneously limiting cities' green space, drainage, and rainwater collection ability. Consequently, rain discharge cannot meet modern cities' requirements, causing cities lots of problems regarding water ecology and aquatic environments.[25]

Meanwhile, high-intensity artificial constructions, such as buildings, roads, and public squares, lead to the lower pad's excessive hardening, changing the original natural foundation and hydrological characteristics. Because of this, surface flow increases from 10% to 60%, while infiltration is drastically reduced, even to zero.[26] According to an investigation that the Ministry of Housing and Urban‑Rural Development conducted in 2010, 62% of 351 cities across the country faced flooding between 2008 and 2010; 137 cities flooded more than three times during this time period. This frequent urban flooding makes more and more people recognize the importance of water ecosystems and urban ecological infrastructure. The simple concept of fast discharge, a traditional gray water management model, is no longer helpful in addressing the rainwater dilemma during rapid urbanization. To cope with such extensive urban water issues, China is increasingly attaching importance to urban flood management and water ecological-system services and vigorously promoting the idea of Sponge City.

## Policy

[edit]

In his speech at the Urbanization Work Conference on December 12, 2013, CCP general secretary Xi Jinping said "When upgrading the urban drainage system, priority should be given to retaining limited rainwater and using the power of nature to drain water. Build a sponge city with natural retention, natural penetration, and natural purification."[27][28][29] To this end, in October 2014, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued "Technical Guidelines for Sponge City Construction", emphasizing the importance of the top-level design of urban rainwater management, as well as planning to guide urban construction with ecological priority as the basic principle.

In August 2015, the "Sponge City Construction Performance Evaluation Method" clarified requirements for the use of central fiscal funds and provided guidelines for the construction effectiveness of pilot demonstration cities. According to the guidelines and related standards and specifications, the China Building Standard Design and Research Institute has initially established a "sponge city construction standard design system", including newly built, expanded, and rebuilt sponge buildings and communities, roads and squares, parks, green spaces, and urban water systems.

The General Office of the State Council Guideline to promote building sponge cities (Guobanfa [2015] No. 75) pointed out that the construction of sponge cities occurs through strengthening the management of urban planning and construction, giving full play to the impact of buildings, roads, green spaces, and water systems on rainwater. Under the guideline, cities in China will collect and utilize 70 percent of the rainwater, with 20 percent of urban areas meeting the target by 2020, and the proportion will increase to 80 percent by 2030.[30]

In 2015 and 2016, pilot projects for sponge cities were organized with the support of national policies. Sixteen cities, including Zhenjiang, Jiaxing, and Xiamen, were selected as the first batch of pilot cities, and 14 cities, including Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing, were selected as the second batch of pilot cities to carry out the construction of sponge cities in an orderly manner. In addition, the Central Ministry of Finance introduced a public-private partnership (PPP) model to increase financial policy support.

However, this set-up may threaten local government's ability to fund these programs, which are estimated to require $230 billion by 2030 in order to meet their goals.[31] The national government is only planning to subsidize one-fifth of the costs of implementing Sponge City policies, and the flooding of over half of pilot cities – such as Ningbo – since the program started has the potential to worry private investors.[31]

China's central government mandates that by 2030, 80% of China's urban space must include sponge city adaptations and must recycle at least 70% of rainfall.[32]

## Design principles

[edit]

Wuhan Optics Valley Modern Tram was built using green track, which reduces surface run-off and provides other environmental benefits.

The Sponge City philosophy is to distribute and retain water at its source, slow down water as it flows away from its source, clean water naturally and be adaptive to water at the sink when water accumulates - this is in stark contrast to the conventional solution of grey infrastructure, which is to centralize and accumulate water using big reservoirs, speed up the flow by pipes and channelized drains, and fight against water at the end by higher and stronger flood walls and dams.[25][33][34] The theory of Sponge City emphasizes the basic principles of 'based on nature', 'source control', 'local adaption', protecting nature, learning from nature, preserving urban ecological space as much as possible, restoring biodiversity, and creating a beautiful landscape environment. All of this can be realized by achieving natural absorption, natural infiltration, and natural purification.[25][35] These principles come from long-standing wisdom and strategies practiced across China for thousands of years, when water had to be worked with and around instead of combatted with gray infrastructure.[2][5] The infiltration effects of the natural ecological background (such as topography and landforms), the purification effect of vegetation and wetlands on water quality, and the combination of natural and artificial means allow the city to absorb and release rainwater. Urban green spaces and urban bodies of water —constructed wetlands, rain gardens, green roofs, recessed green spaces, grass ditches, and ecological parks—are the central "sponge bodies."[35][36]

There are three main facets to developing such systems: protecting the original urban ecosystem, ecological restoration, and low-impact development.

* Protection focuses on the city's original ecologically sensitive areas, such as rivers, lakes, and ditches. Natural vegetation, soil, and microorganisms are used to gradually treat the aquatic environment and restore the damaged urban ecosystem.
* Restoration measures include identifying ecological patches, constructing ecological corridors, strengthening the connections between the patches, forming a network, and delineating the blue and green lines to restore the aquatic ecological environment.
* Mandatory measures apply to urban roads, urban green spaces, urban water systems, residential areas, and specific buildings to protect ecological patches, maintain their storage capacity, strengthen source control, and form ecological sponges of different scales.[37]

Sponge city policies have been more frequently implemented in new construction than in retrofitted developments from the past few decades of rapid urbanization. Xiamen's Yangfang residential area and Shanghai's Langang Park are two new developments indicative of this trend.[38][39] Shougang park, the former site of a steel mill which was redeveloped into a park which includes the 2022 Winter Olympics venue Big Air Shougang, incorporates sponge city design concepts.[40]: 49–51

## Pilot projects

[edit]

### First round (2015)[41]

[edit]

* Baicheng[42]
* Qian’an[43]
* Jinan[44]
* Hebi[citation needed]
* Xixian New Area[45]
* Zhenjiang[46]
* Jiaxing
* Chizhou
* Wuhan[47][48]
* Changde[49]
* Chongqing[50]
* Suining
* Gui’an New Area[51]
* Nanning[52]
* Pingxiang[53]
* Xiamen[54]

### Second round (2016)[41]

[edit]

* Beijing[55]
* Tianjin
* Dalian[56]
* Qingyang
* Guyuan[57]
* Xining
* Shanghai[58]
* Ningbo[59]
* Fuzhou
* Shenzhen[60][61]
* Zhuhai[62]
* Yuxi
* Sanya[63]

## Advantages

[edit]

* Improves overall water quality.
* Rainwater is captured and can be reused.
* Reduces chance of flooding.
* Reduces the railway problems.
* Reduces urban heat island intensity.[64]
* Can shorten instances of flash flooding by leading rainwater to a canal.
* Can deal with prolonged periods of rain.

## See also

[edit]

* Green infrastructure for stormwater management/Low-impact development (North America)
* Nature-based solutions (European Union)
* Water-sensitive urban design (Australia)

## References

[edit]

1. ^ "Sponge Cities: What is it all about?". World Future Council. 20 January 2016.
2. ^ a b Wong, Tessa (11 November 2021). "The man turning cities into giant sponges to embrace floods". BBC News.
3. ^ Gies, Erica (December 2018). "Sponge Cities Can Limit Urban Floods and Droughts". Scientific American. December 2018: 80–85.
4. ^ Frontiers (14 June 2021). "Kongjian Yu | Nature-based solutions for ecological "sponge cities"". YouTube.
5. ^ a b Delaney, Brigid (21 March 2018). "Turning cities into sponges: how Chinese ancient wisdom is taking on climate change". The Guardian.
6. ^ Campbell, Maeve (15 November 2021). "China's sponge cities are a 'revolutionary rethink' to prevent flooding".
7. ^ a b Gies, Erica. "The architect making friends with flooding". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
8. ^ Yu, Kongian (2018). Letters to the Leaders of China: Kongjian Yu and the Future of the Chinese City. New York: Terreform. pp. 54, 111, 124–126. ISBN 978-0-9960041-8-3. "with contributions by Michael Sorkin, Peter Rowe, Thomas. J. Campanella, A. Weiwei, Z. Lin, X. Ren, P.G. Rowe, M. Sorkin, D. Sui, J. Sze, and K. Yu"
9. ^ Yu, Kongjian (2012). "ASLA Award of Excellence: A Green Sponge for A Water Resilient City". American Society of Landscape Architects.
10. ^ a b 俞孔坚及团队的海绵城市理论与实践. "Kongjian Yu and Sponge City Theory and Practice with His Team".
11. ^ "土人设计网 - 北京土人城市规划设计股份有限公司 (城市设计、建筑设计、环境设计、城市与区域规划、风景旅游地规划、城市与区域生态基础设施规划)" [Turen Design Network - Beijing Turen Urban Planning and Design Co., Ltd. (urban design, architectural design, environmental design, urban and regional planning, scenic tourism destination planning, urban and regional ecological infrastructure planning)]. www.turenscape.com. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
12. ^ Hermaputi, Roosmayri Lovina; Hua, Chen (27 February 2017). "Creating Urban Water Resilience: Review of China's Development Strategies " Sponge City " Concept and Practices". The Indonesian Journal of Plannnig and Development. 2 (1): 1–10. doi:10.14710/ijpd.2.1.1-10.
13. ^ Harris, Mark (1 October 2015). "China's sponge cities: soaking up water to reduce flood risks". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
14. ^ "What is a Sponge City?". Simplicable. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
15. ^ Biswas, Asit K.; Hartley, Kris (5 September 2017). "China's 'sponge cities' aim to re-use 70% of rainwater – here's how". The Conversation. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
16. ^ Green, Jared (4 August 2021). "Kongjian Yu Defends His Sponge City Campaign". The Dirt.
17. ^ "Readers write: Defending 'sponge cities' after Zhengzhou floods". Christian Science Monitor. 11 September 2021. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
18. ^ "Meet the Architect Whose Revolutionary "Sponge Cities" are Helping Combat Climate Change". RADII | Stories from the center of China’s youth culture. 28 May 2020. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
19. ^ Harris, Mark (1 October 2015). "China's sponge cities: soaking up water to reduce flood risks". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 August 2019.
20. ^ simoncox (31 May 2016). "Sponge Cities". Hydro International. Archived from the original on 22 July 2021. Retrieved 25 August 2019.
21. ^ Kazi Khaleed Ashraf (14 December 2020). "Imagining a Dhaka for 2035". The Daily Star.
22. ^ "Should Los Angeles Transform Itself Into a Sponge City?". 27 January 2016.
23. ^ "Berlin & China Creating "Sponge Cities" — Landscape Architects Help Cities Absorb Water, Cool Down". 4 December 2017.
24. ^ ""Sponge cities": between Myth and Reality". 5 March 2019.
25. ^ a b c Yu, K. J.; Li, D. H.; Yuan, H.; Fu, W.; Qiao, Q.; Wang, S. S. (2015). "'Sponge City': Theory and practice" (PDF). City Planning Review. 39 (6): 26–36. Retrieved 2020-12-15.
26. ^ Wu, Ye Gang (2016). Sponge City Design: Concept, Technology & Case Study. Jiangsu: Phoenix Science Press.
27. ^ "中国为什么要建设"海绵城市"？--时政--人民网". politics.people.com.cn. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
28. ^ Yu, Kongjian (2021). Sponge City and the Practice of Turenscape, in: deCoding Asian Urbanism. A+D Museum at Los Angeles, and the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute at Harvard University. pp. 196–215. ISBN 978-1-85946-9651.
29. ^ Yu, Kongjian (November 2021). "The Sponge City: Planning, Design and Political Design". African Journal of Landscape Architecture. 2.
30. ^ "Guideline to promote building sponge cities". State Council, People’s Republic of China. Archived from the original on November 6, 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
31. ^ a b Griffiths, James; Chan, Faith Ka Shun; Shao, Michelle; Zhu, Fangfang; Higgitt, David Laurence (3 April 2020). "Interpretation and application of Sponge City guidelines in China". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 378 (2168): 20190222. Bibcode:2020RSPTA.37890222G. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0222. PMC 7061963. PMID 32063173.
32. ^ Curtis, Simon; Klaus, Ian (2024). The Belt and Road City: Geopolitics, Urbanization, and China's Search for a New International Order. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. p. 173\. doi:10.2307/jj.11589102. ISBN 9780300266900. JSTOR jj.11589102.
33. ^ "China's sponge city concept". 29 November 2021.
34. ^ Yu, Kongjian (2017). "Green Infrastructure through the Revival of Ancient Wisdom". American Academy of Arts and Sciences Bulletin. Summer 2017, Vol. LXX, No.4: 35–39.
35. ^ a b 俞孔坚 (2016). 海绵城市——理论与实践（上、下册）. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社. ISBN 9787112194896.
36. ^ "土人设计网 - 北京土人城市规划设计股份有限公司 (城市设计、建筑设计、环境设计、城市与区域规划、风景旅游地规划、城市与区域生态基础设施规划)". www.turenscape.com. Retrieved 2021-12-28.
37. ^ 仇, 保兴 (2015). "海绵城市(LID)的内涵、途径与展望". 中国勘察设计 (7): 30–41. ISSN 1006-9607. Archived from the original on 2021-07-22. Retrieved 2020-12-15.
38. ^ "Xiamen: Adapting to Climate Change with Sponge City Construction – Sino-German Cooperation on Climate Change, Environment, and Natural Resources". 7 July 2020. Retrieved 2021-12-07.
39. ^ 李雯蕊. "'Sponge city'". global.chinadaily.com.cn. Retrieved 2021-12-08.
40. ^ Hu, Richard (2023). Reinventing the Chinese City. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-21101-7.
41. ^ a b Li, Hui; Ding, Liuqian; Ren, Minglei; Li, Changzhi; Wang, Hong (September 2017). "Sponge City Construction in China: A Survey of the Challenges and Opportunities". Water. 9 (9): 594. doi:10.3390/w9090594.
42. ^ Wang, Sisi; Palazzo, Elisa (1 May 2021). "Sponge City and social equity: Impact assessment of urban stormwater management in Baicheng City, China". Urban Climate. 37: 100829. Bibcode:2021UrbCl..3700829W. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100829. ISSN 2212-0955. S2CID 234845468.
43. ^ "North China city Qian'an makes efforts in "sponge city construction" - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
44. ^ Chou, Yi-Ting; Fettes, Anthony. "Expressing a Regional Identity through China's Sponge City Initiative". Sasaki. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
45. ^ Li, Jiake; Ma, Menghua; Li, Yajiao; Deng, Chenning; Pan, Baozhu (16 January 2020). "Evaluating Hydrological and Environmental Effects for Low-Impact Development of a Sponge City". Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 29 (2): 1205–1218. doi:10.15244/pjoes/109308. ISSN 1230-1485. S2CID 209727178.
46. ^ "Zhenjiang Sponge City Infrastructure Planning". Herrera. 15 May 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
47. ^ "Wuhan Sponge City". www.arcadis.com. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
48. ^ Wuhan, Li Jing in (23 January 2019). "Inside China's leading 'sponge city': Wuhan's war with water". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
49. ^ "Changde, China". UrbanLab. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
50. ^ "'Sponge cities' absorb China's flooding woes". China Daily hk. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
51. ^ Qi, Yunfei; Chan, Faith Ka Shun; O'Donnell, Emily C.; Feng, Meili; Sang, Yanfang; Thorne, Colin R.; Griffiths, James; Liu, Lingyun; Liu, Sitong; Zhang, Chunqian; Li, Lei (2021). "Exploring the Development of the Sponge City Program (SCP): The Case of Gui'an New District, Southwest China". Frontiers in Water. 3: 41. doi:10.3389/frwa.2021.676965. ISSN 2624-9375.
52. ^ "Across China: "Sponge city" program bears fruit - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
53. ^ "Xinhua Headlines: Pingxiang, the making of a Chinese "sponge city" - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on August 1, 2019. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
54. ^ "Xiamen: Adapting to Climate Change with Sponge City Construction – Sino-German Cooperation on Climate Change, Environment, and Natural Resources". 7 July 2020. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
55. ^ Zhang, Shuhan; Li, Yongkun; Ma, Meihong; Song, Ting; Song, Ruining (August 2018). "Storm Water Management and Flood Control in Sponge City Construction of Beijing". Water. 10 (8): 1040. doi:10.3390/w10081040.
56. ^ "Sponge City Planning of Dalian based on Functional Division of Natural Ecological Environment" (PDF). Ekoloji.
57. ^ Jia, Lu; Xu, Guoce; Huang, Miansong; Li, Zhanbin; Li, Peng; Zhang, Zhenxi; Wang, Bin; Zhang, Yixin; Zhang, Jiaxin; Cheng, Yuting (2020). "Effects of Sponge City Development on Soil Moisture and Water Quality in a Typical City in the Loess Plateau in China". Frontiers in Earth Science. 8: 125. Bibcode:2020FrEaS...8..125J. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.00125. ISSN 2296-6463.
58. ^ "China's 'sponge cities' are turning streets green to combat flooding". The Guardian. 28 December 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
59. ^ "Is the Sponge City Program (SCP) transforming Chinese cities?". Blue-Green Futures. 16 March 2020. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
60. ^ "Shenzhen". International Water Association. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
61. ^ Cai, Hongru (2017). Decoding Sponge City in Shenzhen : resilience program or growth policy? (Thesis thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. hdl:1721.1/111261.
62. ^ Fu, Yang; Zhang, Xiaoling (1 November 2018). "Two faces of an eco-city? Sustainability transition and territorial rescaling of a new town in Zhuhai". Land Use Policy. 78: 627–636. Bibcode:2018LUPol..78..627F. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.007. ISSN 0264-8377. S2CID 158405949.
63. ^ "土人设计网 - 北京土人城市规划设计股份有限公司 (城市设计、建筑设计、环境设计、城市与区域规划、风景旅游地规划、城市与区域生态基础设施规划)". www.turenscape.com. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
64. ^ He, Bao-Jie; Zhu, Jin; Zhao, Dong-Xue; Gou, Zhong-Hua; Qi, Jin-Da; Wang, Junsong (July 2019). "He, B. J., Zhu, J., Zhao, D. X., Gou, Z. H., Qi, J. D., & Wang, J. (2019). Co-benefits approach: Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation. Land use policy, 86, 147-157". Land Use Policy. 86: 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.003.