The Communist Manifesto

1848 political pamphlet by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

The Communist Manifesto

* [[Karl+Marx]]
* [[Friedrich+Engels]]

&rft.date=21+February+1848&rft.place=United+Kingdom">

First edition in German

Author|

* Karl Marx
* Friedrich Engels

Language| German
Genre| Philosophy

Publication date

| 21 February 1848
Publication place| United Kingdom
Text| The Communist Manifesto at Wikisource
Part of a series on

Marxism
Outline

Theoretical works

* Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844
* The Condition of the Working Class in England
* The German Ideology
* Wage Labour and Capital
* The Communist Manifesto
* The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
* Grundrisse
* Capital
* Critique of the Gotha Programme
* Dialectics of Nature
* The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
* What Is to Be Done?
* The Accumulation of Capital
* Philosophical Notebooks
* Terrorism and Communism
* The State and Revolution
* Essays on Marx's Theory of Value
* History and Class Consciousness
* Prison Notebooks
* The Black Jacobins
* On Practice
* Dialectic of Enlightenment
* A Critique of Soviet Economics
* The Long Revolution
* Guerrilla Warfare
* The Wretched of the Earth
* Reading Capital
* The Society of the Spectacle
* Pedagogy of the Oppressed
* Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
* Ways of Seeing
* How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
* Social Justice and the City
* Women, Race and Class
* Marxism and the Oppression of Women
* Imagined Communities
* Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
* The Sublime Object of Ideology
* Time, Labor and Social Domination
* The Age of Extremes
* The Origin of Capitalism
* Empire
* Late Victorian Holocausts
* Change the World Without Taking Power
* Caliban and the Witch
* An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital
* Capitalist Realism
* Capital in the Anthropocene

Philosophy

* Alienation
* Dialectical materialism
* Ideology
* Philosophy of nature
* Philosophy in the Soviet Union
* Reification
* Marxist ethics

Critique of political economy

* Capital (accumulation)
* Crisis theory
* Commodity
* Concrete and abstract labor
* Factors of production
* Falling profit-rate tendency
* Means of production
* Mode of production
* Capitalist
* Socialist
* Productive forces
* Scientific socialism
* State monopoly capitalism
* Surplus product
* Socially necessary labour time
* Value-form
* Wage labour

Sociology

* Base and superstructure
* Bourgeoisie
* Class
* Class consciousness
* Classless society
* Commodity fetishism
* Communist society
* Critical theory
* Cultural hegemony
* Democracy
* Dictatorship of the proletariat
* Soviet
* Radical
* Democratic centralism
* Exploitation
* False consciousness
* Human nature
* Immiseration
* Imperialism
* Lumpenproletariat
* Metabolic rift
* Proletariat
* Private property
* Relations of production
* State theory
* Working class

History

* Class struggle
* Historical determinism
* Primitive accumulation
* Proletarian revolution
* World revolution
* Theory of historical trajectory

Aspects

* Aesthetics
* Archaeology
* Criminology
* Cultural Marxism
* Cultural Studies
* Ethics
* Film theory
* Geography
* Historiography
* Literary criticism
* Marxism and religion
* Sociology
* Philosophy

Common variants

|  Structural

* Autonomist
* Marxism–Leninism
* Guevarism
* Maoism
* Neo-Gramscianism
* Regulation school
* Third-worldist
* Titoism
* Trotskyism

Hegelian

* Budapest School
* Frankfurt School
* Humanist
* Neue Marx-Lektüre
* Open
* Praxis School

Both

* Black
* Classical
* Communization
* Feminist
* Leninism
* Neo
* Post
* Western

Other variants

* Analytical
* Austromarxism
* Hispanic marxism
* Centrist
* Eurocommunism
* Instrumental
* Marxism–Leninism–Maoism
* Nkrumaism
* Political
* Revisionist
* Situationist
* Socialism with Chinese characteristics
* Wertkritik

People

* Marx
* Engels
* Morris
* Lafargue
* Rubin
* Kautsky
* Plekhanov
* Du Bois
* Connolly
* Lenin
* Luxemburg
* Liebknecht
* Kollontai
* Stalin
* Trotsky
* Grossman
* Zinoviev
* Bloch
* Lukács
* Korsch
* Bukharin
* Ho
* Serge
* Gramsci
* Pashukanis
* Bordiga
* Benjamin
* Mao
* Basu
* Mariátegui
* Horkheimer
* Dutt
* Brecht
* Marcuse
* Kalecki
* Fromm
* Cox
* Lefebvre
* James
* Adorno
* Padmore
* Sartre
* Deutscher
* Beauvoir
* Sombart
* Nkrumah
* Sweezy
* Emmanuel
* Hill
* Bettelheim
* Draper
* Jones
* Hobsbawm
* Althusser
* Hinton
* Williams
* Freire
* Cunhal
* Lara
* Mandel
* Sivanandan
* Miliband
* Cabral
* Thompson
* Bauman
* Fanon
* Berger
* Castro
* Guevara
* Liebman
* Heller
* Guattari
* Mészáros
* O'Connor
* Wallerstein
* Mies
* Tronti
* Debord
* Amin
* Hall
* Nairn
* Parenti
* Negri
* Jameson
* Dussel
* Harvey
* Laclau
* Bahro
* Poulantzas
* Vattimo
* Badiou
* Harnecker
* Altvater
* Ismail
* Anderson
* Löwy
* Vogel
* Sison
* Easthope
* Rancière
* Berman
* Przeworski
* Cohen
* Therborn
* Losurdo
* Postone
* Rodney
* Bannerji
* Spivak
* Newton
* Wood
* Federici
* Wolff
* Balibar
* Eagleton
* Kurz
* Rowbotham
* Mouffe
* Geras
* Brenner
* Davis
* Massey
* Cleaver
* Bishop
* Haraway
* Panitch
* Clarke
* Jessop
* Davis
* Wright
* Fraser
* Burawoy
* Holloway
* Rose
* Screpanti
* Tamás
* Hampton
* Cano
* Žižek
* Berardi
* Sankara
* Hennessy
* McDonnell
* Douzinas
* Roediger
* Foster
* West
* Ghandy
* Marcos
* Heinrich
* Prashad
* Kelley
* Dean
* Lordon
* Linera
* Fisher
* Li
* Prestes
* Coulthard
* Malm
* Seymour
* Toscano
* Bhattacharya
* Moufawad-Paul
* Srnicek
* Horvat
* Hamza
* Saito

Journals

* Antipode
* Capital & Class
* Capitalism Nature Socialism
* Constellations
* Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory
* Historical Materialism
* Mediations
* Monthly Review
* New Left Review
* Race & Class
* Rethinking Marxism
* Science & Society
* Socialist Register

Related topics

* 21st-century communist theorists
* Anarchism
* Creative destruction
* Conflict theory
* Criticism of Marxism
* Communism
* Communalism
* Economic determinism
* History of communism
* Left-wing politics
* Marxian economics
* New Left
* Old Left
* Municipalism
* Political ecology
* Socialism
* Authoritarian
* Democratic
* Market
* Reformist
* Revolutionary
* Social
* Utopian
* Left-wing populism
* Universal class
* Vulgar Marxism
* Economism
* Worker cooperative
* Workers' council

* Communism portal
* Economics portal
* Philosophy portal
* Politics portal
* Socialism portal

* v
* t
* e

The Communist Manifesto (German: Das Kommunistische Manifest), originally the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei), is a political pamphlet written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It was commissioned by the Communist League and published in London in 1848. The text represents the first and most systematic attempt by the two founders of scientific socialism to codify for wide consumption the historical materialist idea, namely, that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles", in which social classes are defined by the relationship of people to the means of production. Published amid the Revolutions of 1848 in Europe, the manifesto remains one of the world's most influential political documents.

In the Manifesto, Marx and Engels combine philosophical materialism with the Hegelian dialectical method in order to analyze the development of European society through its modes of production, including primitive communism, antiquity, feudalism, and capitalism, noting the emergence of a new, dominant class at each stage. The text outlines the relationship between the means of production, relations of production, forces of production, and mode of production, and posits that changes in society's economic "base" affect changes in its "superstructure". The authors assert that capitalism is marked by the exploitation of the proletariat (working class of wage labourers) by the ruling bourgeoisie, which is "constantly revolutionising the instruments [and] relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society".[1] They argue that capital's need for a flexible labour force dissolves the old relations, and that its global expansion in search of new markets creates "a world after its own image".[2]

The Manifesto concludes that capitalism does not offer humanity the possibility of self-realization, instead ensuring that humans are perpetually stunted and alienated. It theorizes that capitalism will bring about its own destruction by polarizing and unifying the proletariat, and predicts that a revolution will lead to the emergence of communism, a classless society in which "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all".[3] Marx and Engels propose the following transitional policies: abolition of private property in land and inheritance; introduction of a progressive income tax; confiscation of emigrants' and rebels' property; nationalisation of credit, communication, and transport; expansion and integration of industry and agriculture; enforcement of universal obligation of labour; provision of universal education; and elimination of child labour.[4] The text ends with three rousing sentences, reworked and popularized into the famous slogan of working-class solidarity: "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains".

## Synopsis

[edit]

The Communist Manifesto is divided into a preamble and four sections. The preamble begins: "A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre of communism."[5][6] Pointing out that it was widespread for politicians—both those in government and those in the opposition—to label their opponents as communists, the authors infer that those in power acknowledge communism to be a power in itself. Subsequently, the preamble exhorts communists to openly publish their views and aims, which is the very function of the Manifesto.[5]

The first section of the document, "Bourgeois and Proletarians",[7] outlines historical materialism, and states that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles".[8] According to the authors, all societies in history had taken the form of an oppressed majority exploited by an oppressive minority. Marx and Engels claim that in their time under capitalism, the industrial working class, or "proletariat", is engaging in class struggle against the owners of the means of production, the "bourgeoisie".[9] The bourgeoisie, through the "constant revolutionising of production [and] uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions" had emerged by 1848 as the supreme class in society, displacing all the old powers of feudalism.[10] The bourgeoisie continuously exploits the proletariat for its labour power, creating profit for themselves and accumulating capital. In doing so, however, Marx and Engels argue that the bourgeois class is serving as "its own grave-diggers" because, in the view of the authors, proletarians will inevitably become conscious of their own potential and rise to power through revolution, overthrowing the bourgeoisie.

Section II, "Proletarians and Communists", starts by explaining the relationship of "conscious communists" (i.e., those who identify as communists) to the rest of the working class. The communists' party will not oppose other working-class parties, but unlike them, it will express the general will and defend the shared interests of the world's proletariat as a whole, independent of all nationalities. The authors go on to defend communism from various objections, including claims that it advocates communal prostitution or disincentivises people from working. Several pages into Section II, the authors surprisingly switch the narrative voice and address the reader directly:[11] "You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths."[12] The section ends by outlining a set of short-term demands—among them a progressive income tax; abolition of inheritances and private property; abolition of child labour; free public education; nationalisation of the means of transport and communication; centralisation of credit via a national bank; expansion of publicly owned land, etc.—the implementation of which, it is argued, would result in the precursor to a classless society.[13]

Section III, "Socialist and Communist Literature", distinguishes communism from other socialist doctrines prevalent at the time, which are categorised as Reactionary Socialism; Conservative or Bourgeois Socialism; and Critical-Utopian Socialism and Communism. The first category is subdivided into "Feudal Socialism", "Petty-Bourgeois Socialism", and "German or 'True' Socialism". While the degree of reproach varies toward these rival socialist perspectives, all are dismissed by Marx and Engels for advocating reformism and for failing to recognise the pre-eminent revolutionary role of the proletariat. The authors are least hostile toward the utopian socialists whose attacks on existing society "are full of the most valuable materials for the enlightenment of the working class."[14][15]

The fourth and concluding section, "Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Opposition Parties", briefly discusses the communist position on struggles in specific countries in the mid-19th century such as in France, Switzerland, Poland, and lastly Germany, which is said to be "on the eve of a bourgeois revolution" that is but "the prelude to an immediately following proletarian revolution" (a prediction later criticized as a fundamental error in the Manifesto).[16] The section ends by declaring an alliance with the democratic socialists, boldly supporting other communist revolutions, and calling for united international proletarian action: "Working Men of All Countries, Unite!"

## Writing

[edit]

In spring of 1847, Marx and Engels joined the League of the Just, which was soon convinced by the duo's ideas of "critical communism".[17] At its First Congress from 2–9 June, the League tasked Engels with drafting a "Creed" document outlining the League's programme, to be submitted for review at the end of the Congress.[18] Engels quickly produced the "Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith" in question-and-answer format, similar to a catechism, e.g.:

> Question 1: Are you a communist?
> Answer: Yes.
> Question 2: What is the aim of the communists?
> To organize society in such a way that each of its members can develop and utilize all his potentialities and powers in full freedom without jeopardizing the foundations of this society.[19]

In total, there were 22 questions, and the answers were relatively terse. In October, Engels arrived at the League's Paris branch to find that Moses Hess had written his own "Creed" document for the League (now called the League of Communists). Engels severely criticised this document (in Hess's absence), and convinced the rest of the League to entrust him with drafting a new one.[18] At the end of October, he wrote the Principles of Communism, again in the style of a catechism but now with 25 questions and more detailed, concrete answers than before.[20][21]

On 23 November, prior to the League of Communists' Second Congress (29 November – 8 December 1847), Engels sent a letter to Marx, expressing a desire to eschew the catechism format in favour of a manifesto, because he felt it must contain "a certain amount of history."[22][23] On 28 November, Marx and Engels met at Ostend in Belgium, and a few days later, gathered at the Soho, London headquarters of the German Workers' Education Association to attend the Congress. Over the next ten days, intense debate raged between League functionaries; Marx eventually dominated the others and, overcoming "stiff and prolonged opposition",[24] in Harold Laski's words, secured a majority for his programme. The League thus unanimously adopted a far more combative resolution than at the First Congress in June. Marx (especially) and Engels were commissioned to draw up a manifesto for the League.

Only surviving page from the first draft of the Manifesto, handwritten by Karl Marx

Upon returning to Brussels, Marx engaged in "ceaseless procrastination", according to his biographer Francis Wheen.[25] Working only intermittently on the Manifesto, Marx spent much of his time delivering lectures on political economy at the German Workers' Education Association, writing articles for the Deutsche-Brüsseler-Zeitung, and giving a long speech on free trade. Following this, he even spent a week (17–26 January 1848) in Ghent to establish a branch of the Democratic Association.[26] Having not heard from Marx for nearly two months, the Central Committee of the Communist League sent him an ultimatum on 24 or 26 January, demanding he submit the completed manuscript by 1 February. This imposition spurred Marx on, who struggled to work without the pressure of a deadline, and he seems to have rushed to finish the job in time. As evidence of the haste, historian Eric Hobsbawm points to the absence of any extant preliminary drafts; only one Manifesto draft page has ever been located.[27]

In all, the Manifesto was written over a span of 6–7 weeks. Although Engels is credited as co-author, the final version was penned exclusively by Marx. Laski infers from the January ultimatum letter that the Communist League considered Marx to be the principal draftsman and that Engels was merely their agent, imminently replaceable. Engels himself wrote in a preface to the 1883 German edition: "The basic thought running through the Manifesto [...] belongs solely and exclusively to Marx".[28] While Laski does not disagree, he suggests that Engels underplays his own contribution with characteristic modesty, and notes the "close resemblance between its substance and that of the [Principles of Communism]". Moreover, Laski says that while writing the Manifesto, Marx was borrowing from the "joint stock of ideas" he developed with Engels, "a kind of intellectual bank account upon which either could draw freely".[29] Anthony Arnove also believes that "the kernel of the Manifesto" can be found in the Principles of Communism, and that Marx's real task "was to translate this catechism into the form of a manifesto, with more historical narrative and greater rhetorical force."[30]

## Publication

[edit]

### Initial publication and obscurity, 1848–1872

[edit]

A scene from the German March 1848 Revolution in Berlin

In late February 1848, the Manifesto was anonymously published by the Communist Workers' Educational Association (Kommunistischer Arbeiterbildungsverein), based at 46 Liverpool Street, in the Bishopsgate Without area of the City of London.[31] Written in German, the 23-page pamphlet was titled Manifest der kommunistischen Partei and had a dark-green cover. It was reprinted three times and serialised in the Deutsche Londoner Zeitung, a newspaper for German émigrés. On 4 March, one day after the serialisation in the Zeitung began, Marx was expelled by Belgian police. Two weeks later, around 20 March, a thousand copies of the Manifesto reached Paris, and from there to Germany in early April. In April–May the text was corrected for printing and punctuation mistakes; Marx and Engels would use this 30-page version as the basis for future editions of the Manifesto.

Although the Manifesto's preamble announced that it was "to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages", the initial printings were only in German. Polish and Danish translations soon followed the German original in London, and by the end of 1848, a Swedish translation was published with a new title—The Voice of Communism: Declaration of the Communist Party. In November 1850, the Manifesto of the Communist Party had its first English publication when George Julian Harney serialised Helen Macfarlane's translation in his Chartist newspaper The Red Republican. Her version begins: "A frightful hobgoblin stalks throughout Europe. We are haunted by a ghost, the ghost of Communism".[32][33] For her translation, the Lancashire-based Macfarlane probably consulted Engels, who had abandoned his own English translation half way. Harney's introduction revealed the Manifesto's hitherto-anonymous authors' identities for the first time.

Immediately after the Cologne Communist Trial of late 1852, the Communist League disbanded itself.

A French translation of the Manifesto was published just before the June Days Uprising was crushed. Its influence in the Europe-wide Revolutions of 1848 was restricted to Germany, where the Cologne-based Communist League and its newspaper Neue Rheinische Zeitung, edited by Marx, played an important role. Within a year of its establishment, in May 1849, the Zeitung was suppressed; Marx was expelled from Germany and had to seek refuge in London. In 1851, members of the Communist League's central board were arrested by the Prussian Secret Police. At their trial in Cologne 18 months later in November 1852, they were sentenced to 3–6 years' imprisonment. For Engels, the revolution was "forced into the background by the reaction that began with the defeat of the Paris workers in June 1848, and was finally excommunicated 'by law' in the conviction of the Cologne Communists in November 1852".[34]

After the defeat of the 1848 revolutions, the Manifesto fell into obscurity, where it remained throughout the 1850s and 1860s. Hobsbawm says that by November 1850 the Manifesto "had become sufficiently scarce for Marx to think it worth reprinting section III [...] in the last issue" of his short-lived London newspaper, Neue Rheinische Zeitung.[35] Over the next two decades only a few new editions were published; these included an (unauthorised and occasionally inaccurate) 1869 Russian translation by Mikhail Bakunin in Geneva, and an 1866 edition in Berlin—the first time the Manifesto was published in Germany. According to Hobsbawm, "By the middle 1860s virtually nothing that Marx had written in the past was any longer in print".[36] However, John Cowell-Stepney did print an abridged version in the Social Economist in August/September 1869,[37] in time for the Basle Congress.

### Rise, 1872–1917

[edit]

In the early 1870s, the Manifesto and its authors experienced a revival in fortunes. Hobsbawm identifies three reasons for this. The first is the leadership role Marx played in the International Workingmen's Association (aka the First International). Second, Marx came into great prominence among socialists—and equal notoriety among the authorities—for his support of the Paris Commune of 1871, elucidated in The Civil War in France. Third, and perhaps most significantly was the treason trial of the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Germany (SDAP) leaders.[36] During the proceedings, prosecutors read the text of the Manifesto into the court record; this meant that the pamphlet could legally be published in Germany.[36] Thus in 1872 Marx and Engels rushed out a new German-language edition. In the preface, they acknowledged that while some of the document's details had become dated in the intervening quarter century, "the general principles laid down in the Manifesto are, on the whole, as correct today as ever."[38] This edition was the first time the title was shortened to The Communist Manifesto (Das Kommunistische Manifest), and it became the version the authors based future editions upon. Between 1871 and 1873, the Manifesto was published in over nine editions in six languages. On 30 December 1871, Woodhull & Claflin's Weekly published it in the U.S. for the first time; it was printed in English using the Helen Macfarlane translation.[39] By the mid-1870s, however, the Communist Manifesto remained Marx and Engels' only work to be even moderately well-known.

Over the next forty years, as social-democratic parties rose across Europe and parts of the world, so did the publication of the Manifesto alongside them, in hundreds of editions in thirty languages. Marx and Engels wrote a new preface for the 1882 Russian edition, translated by Georgi Plekhanov in Geneva. In it they wondered if Russia could directly become a communist society, or if she would become capitalist first like other European countries. After Marx's death in March 1883, Engels provided the prefaces for five editions between 1888 and 1893. Among these is the 1888 English edition, translated by Samuel Moore and approved by Engels, who also provided notes throughout the text. It has become the standard English-language edition ever since.[40]

The Manifesto's principal sphere of influence, as measured by the locations where editions were published, was in the "central belt of Europe", from Russia in the east to France in the west.[41] In comparison, the pamphlet had little impact on politics in southwest and southeast Europe, and moderate presence in the north. Outside Europe, Chinese and Japanese translations were published, as were Spanish editions in Latin America. The first Chinese edition of the book was translated by Zhu Zhixin after the 1905 Russian Revolution in a Tongmenghui newspaper along with articles on socialist movements in Europe, North America, and Japan.[42]

This uneven spread in the Manifesto's popularity reflected the uneven development of socialist movements, and of the adoption of Marxist socialism, in various geographical regions.[43] Also, there was not always a strong correlation between a social-democratic party's strength in a country and the Manifesto's popularity there. For instance, the German SPD printed only a few thousand copies of the Manifesto every year, but a few hundred thousand copies of the Erfurt Programme. The mass-based social-democratic parties of the Second International did not require their rank-and-file to be well-versed in theory; Marxist works such as the Manifesto or Das Kapital were read primarily by party theoreticians. On the other hand, small, dedicated militant parties and Marxist sects in the West took pride in knowing the Manifesto by heart. Hobsbawm writes, "This was the milieu in which 'the clearness of a comrade could be gauged invariably from the number of earmarks on his Manifesto'."[44]

### Ubiquity, 1917–present

[edit]

Following the 1917 October Revolution, Marx and Engels' classics like The Communist Manifesto were distributed far and wide.

Following the October Revolution of 1917 that swept the Vladimir Lenin-led Bolsheviks to power in Russia, the world's first socialist state was founded explicitly along Marxist lines. The Soviet Union, which Bolshevik Russia would become a part of, was a one-party state under the rule of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Unlike their mass-based counterparts of the Second International, the CPSU and other Leninist parties like it in the Third International expected their members to know the classic works of Marx, Engels and Lenin. Further, party leaders were expected to base their policy decisions on Marxist–Leninist ideology. Therefore, the Manifesto was required reading.[45]

Widespread dissemination of Marx and Engels' works became an important policy objective. Backed by a sovereign state, the CPSU had relatively inexhaustible resources for this purpose. Works by Marx, Engels, and Lenin were published on a very large scale, and cheap editions of their works were available in several languages across the world. These publications were either specific writings, or they were compendia such as the various editions of Marx and Engels' Selected Works, or their Collected Works. This affected the destiny of the Manifesto in several ways. Firstly, in terms of circulation; in 1932 the American and British Communist Parties printed several hundred thousand copies of a cheap edition for "probably the largest mass edition ever issued in English".[46] Secondly, the Manifesto entered political-science syllabi in universities. For its centenary in 1948, the Manifesto had moved beyond the exclusive domain of Marxists and academicians; general publishers also printed it in large numbers. "In short, it was no longer only a classic Marxist document", Hobsbawm noted, "it had become a political classic tout court."[47]

Total sales of the Manifesto have been estimated at 500 million, and it is one of the four best-selling books of all time.[48] In 1920, the Communist Manifesto was printed and distributed in Chinese.[49]: 104 Chen Wangdao is credited as translator of the first printing.[49]: 106

Even after the collapse of the Soviet Bloc in the 1990s, the Communist Manifesto has remained ubiquitous; Hobsbawm says that "In states without censorship, almost certainly anyone within reach of a good bookshop, and certainly anyone within reach of a good library, not to mention the internet, can have access to it".[47] The 150th anniversary once again brought a deluge of attention in the press and the academia, as well as new editions fronted by introductions to the text by academics. One of these, The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition by Verso, was touted by a critic in the London Review of Books as being a "stylish red-ribboned edition of the work. It is designed as a sweet keepsake, an exquisite collector's item. In Manhattan, a prominent Fifth Avenue store put copies of this choice new edition in the hands of shop-window mannequins, displayed in come-hither poses and fashionable décolletage".[50]

## Legacy

[edit]

> "With the clarity and brilliance of genius, this work outlines a new world-conception, consistent materialism, which also embraces the realm of social life; dialectics, as the most comprehensive and profound doctrine of development; the theory of the class struggle and of the world-historic revolutionary role of the proletariat—the creator of a new, communist society."

—Vladimir Lenin on the Manifesto, 1914[51]

A number of late-20th- and 21st-century writers have commented on the Communist Manifesto's continuing relevance. In a special issue of the Socialist Register commemorating the Manifesto's 150th anniversary, Peter Osborne argued that it was "the single most influential text written in the nineteenth century".[52] Academic John Raines in 2002 noted: "In our day this Capitalist Revolution has reached the farthest corners of the earth. The tool of money has produced the miracle of the new global market and the ubiquitous shopping mall. Read The Communist Manifesto, written more than one hundred and fifty years ago, and you will discover that Marx foresaw it all".[53] In 2003, English Marxist Chris Harman stated: "There is still a compulsive quality to its prose as it provides insight after insight into the society in which we live, where it comes from and where it's going to. It is still able to explain, as mainstream economists and sociologists cannot, today's world of recurrent wars and repeated economic crisis, of hunger for hundreds of millions on the one hand and 'overproduction' on the other. There are passages that could have come from the most recent writings on globalisation".[54] Alex Callinicos, editor of International Socialism, stated in 2010: "This is indeed a manifesto for the 21st century".[55] Writing in The London Evening Standard, Andrew Neather cited Verso Books' 2012 re-edition of The Communist Manifesto with an introduction by Eric Hobsbawm as part of a resurgence of left-wing-themed ideas which includes the publication of Owen Jones' book Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class and Jason Barker's documentary Marx Reloaded.[56]

Soviet Union stamp commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Manifesto

In contrast, critics such as revisionist Marxist and reformist socialist Eduard Bernstein distinguished between "immature" early Marxism—as exemplified by The Communist Manifesto written by Marx and Engels in their youth—that he opposed for its violent Blanquist tendencies and later "mature" Marxism that he supported.[57] This latter form refers to Marx in his later life seemingly claiming that socialism, under certain circumstances, could be achieved through peaceful means via legislative reform in capitalist societies with parliamentary systems.[58]

Bernstein declared that the massive and homogeneous working-class posited in the Communist Manifesto did not exist, and that contrary to predictions of a proletarian majority emerging, the middle-class was growing under capitalism and not disappearing as Marx had forecast. Marx himself later acknowledged that the Petite bourgeoisie was not disappearing, for example, in his 1863 work, Theories of Surplus Value. The obscurity of his later work means that Marx's acknowledgement of his error was not well known.[59] George Boyer described the Manifesto as "very much a period piece, a document of what was called the 'hungry' 1840s".[60] Hal Draper rejected Bernstein's arguments about the middle class, stating that the Manifesto actually notes that, although individual members of this class are being constantly proletarianized, the class 'limps on, in a more and more ruined state'.[61]

Foremost among the Manifesto's criticized predictions is that world revolution is imminent. Seymour Lipset wrote in 1981 that "Marx's fundamental premise has been totally refuted by history", i.e., that class conflicts in highly industrialized countries would soon result in workers overturning capitalism.[62] After asserting in a book review that the Manifesto has enduring relevance, Cory Doctorow added: "This despite its most glaring defect, because, of course, the Manifesto's chief prediction - the imminent downfall of capitalism - was dead wrong."[63]

Many have drawn attention to the passage in the Manifesto that seems to sneer at the stupidity of the rustic: "The bourgeoisie [...] draws all nations [...] into civilisation[.] [...] It has created enormous cities [...] and thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy [sic] of rural life".[64] However, as Eric Hobsbawm noted:

> [W]hile there is no doubt that Marx at this time shared the usual townsman's contempt for, as well as ignorance of, the peasant milieu, the actual and analytically more interesting German phrase ("dem Idiotismus des Landlebens entrissen") referred not to "stupidity" but to "the narrow horizons", or "the isolation from the wider society" in which people in the countryside lived. It echoed the original meaning of the Greek term idiotes from which the current meaning of "idiot" or "idiocy" is derived, namely "a person concerned only with his own private affairs and not with those of the wider community". In the course of the decades since the 1840s, and in movements whose members, unlike Marx, were not classically educated, the original sense was lost and was misread.[65]

In 2013, The Communist Manifesto was registered to UNESCO's Memory of the World Programme along with Marx's Capital, Volume I.[66]

## Influences

[edit]

Marx and Engels' political influences were wide-ranging, reacting to and taking inspiration from German idealist philosophy, French socialism, and English and Scottish political economy. The Communist Manifesto also takes influence from literature. In Jacques Derrida's work, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International, he uses William Shakespeare's Hamlet to frame a discussion of the history of the International, showing in the process the influence that Shakespeare's work had on Marx and Engels' writing.[67] In his essay, "Big Leagues: Specters of Milton and Republican International Justice between Shakespeare and Marx", Christopher Warren makes the case that English poet John Milton also had a substantial influence on Marx and Engels' work.[68] Historians of 19th-century reading habits have confirmed that Marx and Engels would have read these authors and it is known that Marx loved Shakespeare in particular.[69][70][71] Milton, Warren argues, also shows a notable influence on The Communist Manifesto, saying: "Looking back on Milton's era, Marx saw a historical dialectic founded on inspiration in which freedom of the press, republicanism, and revolution were closely joined".[68] Milton's republicanism, Warren continues, served as "a useful, if unlikely, bridge" as Marx and Engels sought to forge a revolutionary international coalition. The Manifesto also makes reference to the "revolutionary" antibourgeois social criticism of Thomas Carlyle, whom Engels had read as early as May 1843.[72][73][74]

## Editions

[edit]

* Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich (1977) [1848]. Manifesto of the Communist Party (2nd revised ed.). Moscow: Progress.
* Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich (2004) [1848]. Manifesto of the Communist Party (PDF). Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved 14 March 2015.

## Footnotes

[edit]

1. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, pp. 38–9.
2. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 40.
3. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 60.
4. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 59.
5. ^ a b Marx & Engels 1977, p. 34.
6. ^ "Letters". London Review of Books. Vol. 45, no. 14\. 13 July 2023. Later scholarship revealed that the phrase, "das Gespenst des Kommunismus" ("the spectre of communism"), was not coined by Marx. It had been used several times in the 1840s, e.g., by Moses Hess in a November 1847 article that Marx would have been familiar with.
7. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, pp. 35–48.
8. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 35.
9. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 36.
10. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 39.
11. ^ Miéville 2022, p. 50.
12. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 52.
13. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, pp. 59–60: "If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organise itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class."
14. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 71.
15. ^ Miéville 2022, p. 63.
16. ^ Marx & Engels 1977, p. 74.
17. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 101.
18. ^ a b Laski 1948, p. 24.
19. ^ Struik 1971, p. 163.
20. ^ Struik 1971, p. 162.
21. ^ Miéville 2022, p. 30.
22. ^ Miéville 2022, p. 30: Excerpt from Engels letter to Marx: "I believe that the best thing is to do away with the catechism form and give the thing the title: Communist Manifesto. We have to bring in a certain amount of history, and the present form does not lend itself to this very well."
23. ^ Torr, Dona, ed. (1942). "Engels to Marx: Paris, 23–24 November, 1847". Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Selected Correspondence, 1846–1895, with explanatory notes. Marxist Library, Volume XXIX. New York: International Publishers. p. 20\. LCCN 43011421.
24. ^ Laski, Harold (1948). "Introduction". Communist Manifesto: Socialist Landmark. George Allen and Unwin. p. 22 - via Internet Archive.
25. ^ Wheen, Francis (2000). Karl Marx: A Life. W. W. Norton & Co. p. 118\. ISBN 978-0393049237.
26. ^ Wheen 2000, p. 118.
27. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 102.
28. ^ Engels, Friedrich (28 June 1883). "The 1883 German Edition - Preface". Marxists Internet Archive.
29. ^ Laski 1948, p. 26.
30. ^ Arnove, Anthony (21 September 2007). "The Communist Manifesto". SocialistWorker.org.
31. ^ Bosmajian, Haig A. "A RHETORICAL APPROACH TO THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO" (PDF). dalspace.library.dal.ca. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
32. ^ Yeoman, Louise. "Helen McFarlane – the radical feminist admired by Karl Marx Archived 2 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine". BBC Scotland. 25 November 2012.
33. ^ Usher, Robert J. (1910). "The Bibliography of The Communist Manifesto". Papers. 5: 109–114\. JSTOR 24306239.
34. ^ Engels, Friedrich (1 May 1890). "The 1890 German Edition - Preface". Marxists Internet Archive.
35. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, pp. 102–03.
36. ^ a b c Hobsbawm 2011, p. 103.
37. ^ Leopold, David (2015). "Marx Engels and Other Socialisms". In Carver, Terrell; Farr, James (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to The Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. ^ Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich (24 June 1872). "The 1872 German Edition - Preface". Marxists Internet Archive.
39. ^ "German Communism—Manifesto of the German Communist Party" (PDF). Woodhull & Claflin's Weekly. Vol. 04, no. 7\. 30 December 1871. pp. 3–7, 12–13 - via IAPSOP.com.
40. ^ Ford, Thomas H. (July 2021). "Atmospheric Late Romanticism: Babbage, Marx, Ruskin". Romanticism. 27 (2): 187–200\. doi:10.3366/rom.2021.0508 - via Edinburgh University Press. "...and which Samuel Moore, the translator of the now standard anglophone edition of The Communist Manifesto..."
41. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 104.
42. ^ Pons, Silvio; Smith, Stephen A., eds. (2017). The Cambridge History of Communism: Volume 1: World Revolution and Socialism in One Country 1917–1941. Vol. 1\. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316137024. ISBN 978-1107092846.
43. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, pp. 104–105.
44. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 105.
45. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, pp. 105–106.
46. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 106.
47. ^ a b Hobsbawm 2011, p. 107.
48. ^ "Seven facts about Karl Marx". www.deutschland.de. 27 April 2018.
49. ^ a b Li, Ying (2024). Red Ink: A History of Printing and Politics in China. Royal Collins Press. ISBN 978-1487812737.
50. ^ Holmes, Stephen (29 October 1998). "The End of Idiocy on a Planetary Scale". London Review of Books. Vol. 20, no. 21.
51. ^ Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 6, p. xxvi.
52. ^ Osborne, Peter. 1998. "Remember the Future? The Communist Manifesto as Historical and Cultural Form" in Panitch, Leo and Colin Leys, Eds., The Communist Manifesto Now: Socialist Register, 1998 London: Merlin Press, p. 170. Available online from the Socialist Register Archived 20 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine archives. Retrieved November 2015.
53. ^ Raines, John, ed. (2002). "Introduction". Marx on Religion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. p. 5\. ISBN 978-1566399395.
54. ^ Harman, Chris (2010). "The Manifesto and the World of 1848". The Communist Manifesto (Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich). Bloomsbury, London: Bookmarks. p. 3.
55. ^ Callinicos, Alex (2010). "The Manifesto and the Crisis Today". The Communist Manifesto (Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich). Bloomsbury, London: Bookmarks. p. 8.
56. ^ "The Marx effect". The London Evening Standard. 23 April 2012. Archived from the original on 14 January 2013. Retrieved 8 May 2012.
57. ^ Steger, Manfred B. The Quest for Evolutionary Socialism: Eduard Bernstein And Social Democracy. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. pp. 236–37.
58. ^ Ishay, Micheline R.. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008. p. 148. ISBN 978-0520256415
59. ^ Harrington, Michael. Socialism: Past and Future. Reprint edition of original published in 1989. New York: Arcade Publishing, 2011. pp. 249–250. OCLC 759166335
60. ^ Boyer 1998, p. 151.
61. ^ Draper, Hal (1978). "Special Note F. The Alleged Theory of the Disappearance of the Middle Classes". Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution (Volume 2): The Politics of Social Classes New York: Monthly Review Press. p. 618. ISBN 978-0853455660
62. ^ Lipset, Seymour (June 1981). "Whatever Happened to the Proletariat? An Historic Mission Unfulfilled". Encounter. Vol. 56, no. 6\. pp. 18–34.
63. ^ Doctorow, Cory (31 October 2022). "Why The Communist Manifesto Still Matters". New York Times Book Review.
64. ^ The [sic!] is that of Joseph Schumpeter; see Schumpeter 1997, p. 8 n2.
65. ^ Hobsbawm 2011, p. 108.
66. ^ "Schriften von Karl Marx: "Das Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei" (1948) und "Das Kapital", ernster Band (1867)" Archived 22 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine. UNESCO.
67. ^ Derrida, Jacques. "What is Ideology? Archived 10 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine" in Specters of Marx, the state of the debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International, translated by Peggy Kamuf, Routledge 1994.
68. ^ a b Warren, Christopher N. (2016). "Big Leagues: Specters of Milton and Republican International Justice between Shakespeare and Marx". Humanity. 7 (3): 365–389\. doi:10.17613/M6VW8W. Archived from the original on 24 September 2020.
69. ^ Rose, Jonathan (2001). The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes Archived 28 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine. pp. 26, 36–37, 122–125, 187.
70. ^ Taylor, Antony (2002). "Shakespeare and Radicalism: The Uses and Abuses of Shakespeare in Nineteenth-Century Popular Politics." Historical Journal 45, no. 2. pp. 357–379.
71. ^ Marx, Karl (1844). "On the Jewish Question".
72. ^ Demetz, Peter (1967). "Economics and Intellect: Thomas Carlyle". Marx, Engels, and the Poets: Origins of Marxist Literary Criticism. Translated by Sammons, Jeffrey L. (Revised ed.). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. p. 37.
73. ^ Zenzinger, Peter (2004). "Engels, Friedrich". In Cumming, Mark (ed.). The Carlyle Encyclopedia. Madison and Teaneck, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 149–150\. ISBN 978-0838637920.
74. ^ Zenzinger, Peter (2004). "Marx, Karl". In Cumming, Mark (ed.). The Carlyle Encyclopedia. Madison and Teaneck, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 310\. ISBN 978-0838637920.

## References

[edit]

* Adoratsky, V. (1938). The History of the Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels. New York: International Publishers. LCCN 41-4536.
* Boyer, George R. (1998). "The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 12 (4): 151–174\. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.673.9426. doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.151. JSTOR 2646899.
* Hobsbawm, Eric (2011). "On the Communist Manifesto". How To Change The World: Reflections on Marx and Marxism (PDF). Yale University Press. pp. 101–120\. ISBN 978-0300176162 - via Online University of the Left. This chapter originally appeared as Hobsbawm's Introduction to The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition (Verso, 1998, ISBN 978-1859848982), a book published on the Manifesto's 150th anniversary.
* Hunt, Tristram (2009). Marx's General: The Revolutionary Life of Friedrich Engels. Metropolitan Books.
* Miéville, China (2022). A Spectre, Haunting: On The Communist Manifesto. Haymarket Books. ISBN 978-1642598919.
* Schumpeter, Joseph (1997) [1952]. Ten Great Economists: From Marx to Keynes. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415110792.
* Struik, Dirk J., ed. (1971). Birth of the Communist Manifesto. New York: International Publishers. ISBN 0717802884.

## Further reading

[edit]

* Black, David (2004). "The Translation of The Communist Manifesto". Helen Macfarlane: A Feminist, Revolutionary Journalist, and Philosopher in Mid-nineteenth-century England. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0739108635.
* Draper, Hal (2020) [1994]. The Adventures of the Communist Manifesto. Chicago: Haymarket Books. ISBN 978-1642590388.
* Gasper, Phil, ed. (2005). The Communist Manifesto: A Road Map to History's Most Important Political Document. Chicago: Haymarket Books. ISBN 978-1931859257.
* Schumpeter, Joseph A. (June 1949). "The Communist Manifesto in Sociology and Economics". Journal of Political Economy. 57 (3): 199–212\. doi:10.1086/256806. JSTOR 1826126. S2CID 144457532.

## External links

[edit]

English Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Manifesto of the Communist Party

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Communist Manifesto.

Wikiquote has quotations related to The Communist Manifesto.

* Communism portal

* The Communist Manifesto at Standard Ebooks
* The Communist Manifesto at the Marxists Internet Archive
* Manifesto of the Communist Party, an English-language translation by Progress Publishers, in PDF format
* The Communist Manifesto in 80 world languages
* Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei : veröffentlicht im Februar 1848 Original 1848 edition in full colour scan
* The Communist Manifesto public domain audiobook at LibriVox
* Democracy and the Communist Manifesto
* On the Communist Manifesto - In English Archived 4 November 2016 at the Wayback Machine at modkraft.dk (a collection of links to bibliographical and historical materials, and contemporary analyses)
*   * The Communist Manifesto at Project Gutenberg

* v
* t
* e

Works by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

Marx|

| Das Kapital|

* Das Kapital, Volume I (1867)
* Das Kapital, Volume II (1885, posthumous)
* Das Kapital, Volume III (1894, posthumous)

|

Other works|

* Scorpion and Felix (1837)
* Oulanem (1839)
* The Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature (1841)
* "The Philosophical Manifesto of the Historical School of Law" (1842)
* Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843, published 1927)
* "On the Jewish Question" (1843)
* "Notes on James Mill" (1844)
* Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (1844, published 1932)
* "Theses on Feuerbach" (1845, published 1888)
* The Poverty of Philosophy (1847)
* "Wage Labour and Capital" (1847)
* The Class Struggles in France, 1848–1850 (1850)
* The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852)
* Grundrisse (1857, published 1939)
* A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)
* Theories of Surplus Value (three volumes, 1862)
* "Value, Price and Profit" (1865)
* "The Belgian Massacres" (1869)
* "The Civil War in France" (1871)
* Critique of the Gotha Programme (1875)
* Mathematical manuscripts (1968)
* Notebooks on the history of technology

Marx and
Engels|

* The Holy Family (1844)
* The German Ideology (1845, published 1932)
* The Communist Manifesto (1848)
* The Civil War in the United States (1861)

Engels|

* The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845)
* Principles of Communism (1847)
* The Peasant War in Germany (1850)
* "The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man" (1876)
* Anti-Dühring (1878)
* Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880)
* Dialectics of Nature (1883)
* The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884)
* Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (1886)
* A Contribution to the History of Primitive Christianity (1894)
* Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Germany (1896, posthumous)

Collections|

* Marx/Engels Collected Works (1975–2004)
* Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (1975–today)
* Karl Marx Library (1971–1977)

* v
* t
* e

Political philosophy

Terms|

* Authority
* Citizenship‎
* Duty
* Elite
* Emancipation
* Freedom
* Government
* Hegemony
* Hierarchy
* Justice
* Law
* Legitimacy
* Liberty
* Monopoly
* Nation
* Obedience
* Peace
* People
* Pluralism
* Power
* Progress
* Propaganda
* Property
* Regime
* Revolution
* Rights
* Ruling class
* Society
* Sovereignty‎
* State
* Utopia
* War

Government|

* Aristocracy
* Oligarchy
* Autocracy
* Bureaucracy
* Dictatorship
* Democracy
* Ochlocracy
* Gerontocracy
* Meritocracy
* Monarchy
* Tyranny
* Plutocracy
* Technocracy
* Theocracy

Ideologies|

* Agrarianism
* Anarchism
* Capitalism
* Christian democracy
* Colonialism
* Communism
* Communitarianism
* Confucianism
* Conservatism
* Corporatism
* Distributism
* Environmentalism
* Fascism
* Feminism
* Feudalism
* Imperialism
* Islamism
* Liberalism
* Libertarianism
* Localism
* Marxism
* Monarchism
* Multiculturalism
* Nationalism
* Nazism
* Populism
* Republicanism
* Social Darwinism
* Social democracy
* Socialism
* Third Way

Concepts|

* Balance of power
* Bellum omnium contra omnes
* Body politic
* Clash of civilizations
* Common good
* Consent of the governed
* Divine right of kings
* Family as a model for the state
* Monopoly on violence
* Natural law
* Negative and positive rights
* Night-watchman state
* Noble lie
* Noblesse oblige
* Open society
* Ordered liberty
* Original position
* Overton window
* Separation of powers
* Social contract
* State of nature
* Statolatry
* Supermajority
* Tyranny of the majority

Philosophers|

| Antiquity|

* Aristotle
* Chanakya
* Cicero
* Confucius
* Han Fei
* Lactantius
* Mencius
* Mozi
* Plato
* political philosophy
* Polybius
* Shang
* Sun Tzu
* Thucydides
* Xenophon

|

Middle Ages|

* Al-Farabi
* Aquinas
* Averroes
* Bruni
* Dante
* Gelasius
* al-Ghazali
* Ibn Khaldun
* Marsilius
* Muhammad
* Nizam al-Mulk
* Ockham
* Plethon
* Wang

Early modern
period|

* Boétie
* Bodin
* Bossuet
* Calvin
* Campanella
* Filmer
* Grotius
* Guicciardini
* Hobbes
* political philosophy
* James
* Leibniz
* Locke
* Luther
* Machiavelli
* Milton
* More
* Müntzer
* Pufendorf
* Spinoza
* Suárez

18th and 19th
centuries|

* Bakunin
* Bastiat
* Beccaria
* Bentham
* Bolingbroke
* Bonald
* Burke
* Carlyle
* Comte
* Condorcet
* Constant
* Cortés
* Engels
* Fichte
* Fourier
* Franklin
* Godwin
* Haller
* Hegel
* Herder
* Hume
* Iqbal
* Jefferson
* Kant
* political philosophy
* Le Bon
* Le Play
* Madison
* Maistre
* Marx
* Mazzini
* Mill
* Montesquieu
* Nietzsche
* Owen
* Paine
* Renan
* Rousseau
* Sade
* Saint-Simon
* Smith
* Spencer
* de Staël
* Stirner
* Taine
* Thoreau
* Tocqueville
* Tucker
* Voltaire

20th and 21st
centuries|

* Agamben
* Ambedkar
* Arendt
* Aron
* Badiou
* Bauman
* Benoist
* Berlin
* Bernstein
* Burnham
* Chomsky
* Dmowski
* Du Bois
* Dugin
* Dworkin
* Evola
* Foucault
* Fromm
* Fukuyama
* Gandhi
* Gentile
* Gramsci
* Guénon
* Habermas
* Hayek
* Hoppe
* Huntington
* Kautsky
* Khomeini
* Kirk
* Kropotkin
* Laclau
* Lenin
* Luxemburg
* Mansfield
* Mao
* Marcuse
* Maurras
* Michels
* Mises
* Mosca
* Mouffe
* Negri
* Nozick
* Nussbaum
* Oakeshott
* Ortega
* Pareto
* Popper
* Qutb
* Rand
* Rawls
* Röpke
* Rothbard
* Russell
* Sartre
* Schmitt
* Scruton
* Shariati
* Sorel
* Spann
* Spengler
* Strauss
* Sun
* Taylor
* Voegelin
* Walzer
* Weber

Works|

* Republic (c. 375 BC)
* Politics (c. 350 BC)
* On the Republic (51 BC)
* Treatise on Law (c. 1274)
* Monarchy (1313)
* The Prince (1532)
* Leviathan (1651)
* Two Treatises of Government (1689)
* The Spirit of Law (1748)
* The Social Contract (1762)
* Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
* Rights of Man (1791)
* Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)
* Democracy in America (1835–1840)
* The Communist Manifesto (1848)
* On Liberty (1859)
* The Revolt of the Masses (1929)
* The Road to Serfdom (1944)
* The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)
* The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951)
* A Theory of Justice (1971)
* The End of History and the Last Man (1992)

Related|

* Authoritarianism
* Collectivism and individualism
* Conflict theories
* Contractualism
* Critique of political economy
* Egalitarianism
* Elite theory
* Elitism
* History of political thought
* Institutional discrimination
* Jurisprudence
* Justification for the state
* Political ethics
* Political spectrum
* Left-wing politics
* Centrism
* Right-wing politics
* Political theology
* Political violence
* Separation of church and state
* Separatism
* Social justice
* Statism
* Totalitarianism

* Category:Political philosophy

Authority control databases

International|

* VIAF

National|

* Germany
* United States
* France
* BnF data
* Japan
* Australia
* Croatia
* Sweden
* Israel

Other|

* IdRef
* Yale LUX

*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template