United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758

1971 UN resolution recognizing the PRC as the representative of China

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

|

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

United Nations resolution adopted in 1971

UN General Assembly
Resolution 2758

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758

Date| 25 October 1971
Meeting no.| 1,976
Code| A/RES/2758(XXVI) (Document)
Subject| Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations

Voting summary

* 76 voted for
* 35 voted against
* 17 abstained

Result| Adopted
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758

Traditional Chinese| 聯合國大會第2758號決議
Simplified Chinese| 联合国大会第2758号决议
| Transcriptions

Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin| Liánhéguó Dàhuì 2758 hào juéyì
Wade–Giles| Lien2-ho2-kuo2 Ta4-hui4 2758 hao4 chueh2-yi4
Tongyong Pinyin| Lianheguo Dahuei 2758 hao jyueyi
Yale Romanization| Lyanhegwo Dahwei 2758 hau Jyweyi

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758

The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (also known as the Resolution on Admitting Peking) was passed in response to the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18[1] of the UN Charter. The resolution, passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" (referring to the Republic of China, whose central government had relocated to Taiwan from the mainland) from the United Nations.[2]

## Background[edit]

China was one of the original 51 member states of the United Nations, which was created in 1945. At that time, the Republic of China (ROC), led by the Kuomintang (Chinese Nationalist Party), governed both mainland China and Taiwan. The ROC army was engaged in a civil war with troops led by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). In 1949, the CCP proclaimed the People's Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing, and the remaining mainland ROC forces were forced to retreat to Taiwan, which Japan evacuated from in 1945 and renounced all right, title and claim to in the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951.[3] After January 1950, the PRC was in control of mainland China, but was unable to capture Taiwan, Penghu, Matsu and Kinmen, and thus these remained as ROC ruled lands.[citation needed]

The PRC claimed to be the successor government of the ROC, while the Kuomintang in Taiwan championed the continued existence of the Republic of China. Both claimed to be the only legitimate Chinese government, and each refused to maintain diplomatic relations with countries that have recognized the other. The ROC continued to represent China in the UN until Resolution 2758 was passed.[citation needed]

Article 3 of the UN Charter provides:

> The original Members of the United Nations shall be the states which, having participated in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco, or having previously signed the Declaration by United Nations of 1 January 1942, sign the present Charter and ratify it in accordance with Article 110.

Additionally, the ROC had signed and ratified the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations on 18 April 1961 and 19 December 1969 respectively.[citation needed]

## Proceedings at the United Nations[edit]

On 15 July 1971, 17 UN members: Albania, Algeria, the Congo, Cuba, Guinea, Iraq, Mali, Mauritania, North Yemen, Romania, Somalia, South Yemen, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Yugoslavia, and Zambia, requested that a question of the "Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations" be placed on the provisional agenda of the twenty-sixth session of the United Nations General Assembly.[4] In an explanatory memorandum accompanying their request, the 17 UN members observed that for years they had protested against what they considered were hostile and discriminatory policy followed by several governments with regard to the communist government of mainland China, which they considered to be the genuine representative of the Chinese people.[4] The existence of the People's Republic of China, they declared, was a reality which could "not be changed to suit the myth of a so called Republic of China, fabricated out of a portion of Chinese territory".[4] In the view of the 17 UN members, the ROC were unlawful authorities installed in the island of Taiwan which claimed to represent China, and they remained there only because of the permanent presence of United States Armed Forces.[4] No important international problems, they added, could be solved without the participation of the People's Republic of China. It was in the fundamental interests, they concluded, of the United Nations to "restore" promptly to the People's Republic of China its seat in the organization, thus putting an end to a "grave injustice" and "dangerous situation" which had been perpetuated in order to fulfill a policy that had been increasingly repudiated.[4] This meant the immediate expulsion of the representatives of the Chiang Kai-shek regime from the seat which it held in the United Nations.[4]

On 17 August 1971, the United States requested that a second item, "The representation of China in the United Nations" also be placed on the provisional agenda.[4] In the explanatory memorandum accompanying the U.S. request, the U.S. said that in dealing with the problem of the representation of China, the United Nations should take cognizance of the existence of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China; it should reflect that incontestable reality in the manner in which it made provision for China's representation.[4] The U.S. asserted that the UN should not be required to take a definitive position on the respective conflicting claims of the People's Republic of China or the Republic of China, pending a peaceful resolution of the matter as called for by the United Nations Charter.[4] Thus, the U.S. added, the People's Republic of China should be represented and at the same time provision should be made to ensure that the Republic of China was not deprived of its representation.[4]

On 22 September 1971, the United States proposed at the UN General Committee that the two items be combined into one item called "The Question of China".[4] The proposal was, however, rejected by 12 votes to 9 with 3 abstentions.[4]

On 25 September 1971, the first Albanian-backed draft resolution, A/L.630 and Add.1 and 2, was submitted by 23 states including 17 of the states which had joined in placing the question on the agenda, to: "...restore to the People's Republic of China all its rights and expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek."[5]

On 29 September 1971, a second draft resolution, A/L.632 and Add.1 and 2, sponsored by 22 members including the U.S., was proposed declaring that any proposal to deprive the Republic of China of representation was an important question under Article 18 of the UN Charter, and thus would require a two-thirds supermajority for approval.[6]

On 29 September 1971, a third draft resolution, A/L.633, sponsored by 19 members including the U.S., was proposed by which the Assembly would affirm the right of representation of the People's Republic of China and recommend that it be seated as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, while also affirming the continuing right of representation of the Republic of China.[7]

Adopted resolution 2758

On 15 October 1971 the representatives of 22 UN members requested the UN Secretary-General to distribute, as an official Assembly document, a statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China dated 20 August 1971.[4] In this statement, made in response to the U.S. letter of 17 August 1971 and its accompanying explanatory memorandum, the People's Republic of China declared that the U.S. proposal was a blatant exposure of the Nixon government's scheme of creating "two Chinas" in the United Nations. It added that there was only one China, the People's Republic of China.[4] Taiwan, it continued, was an inalienable part of Chinese territory and a province of China which had already been returned to the motherland after the Second World War.[4] It went on to state that the U.S. was plotting to separate Taiwan from China and was wildly attempting to force members of the UN to submit to its will.[4] The Chinese government declared that the Chinese people and government firmly opposed "two Chinas", "one China, one Taiwan", or any other similar arrangement, as well as the claim that "the status of Taiwan remains to be determined".[4] They declared they would have absolutely nothing to do with the UN in such scenarios.[4]

Discussion at the Assembly took place at 12 plenary meetings between 18 and 26 October 1971 with 73 member states taking part.[4] During the debates four more draft resolutions were submitted - three by Tunisia and one by Saudi Arabia. Broadly, each of these draft resolutions was a variation on the third draft resolution described above, backed by the U.S. Notably, the Saudi-proposed resolution would have held that the people of the island of Taiwan had a right to self-determination.[4] Similarly, the Tunisian resolution would have called for the Republic of China government to be represented in the United Nations under the name "Formosa".[4]

Algeria's representative in the debates submitted that to recognize that the government of the People's Republic of China was lawfully entitled to represent China did not imply the eviction of a member but the eviction of the representatives of a dissident minority regime.[4] The U.S., in its submission, took the opposite view; arguing that adoption of the resolution expelling the representatives sent from Taipei would imply the termination of the membership of a longstanding member. The spokesman of the Republic of China submitted that his country had earned its place in the United Nations by virtue of its contribution to peace and freedom during the Second World War.[4] He said the Chinese communist regime, which had never had the moral consent of the Chinese people, could in no way be regarded as the representative of the great Chinese nation.[4] Various members including two permanent members of the security council, the United Kingdom and the USSR, argued that requiring the matter to be subject to a supermajority vote was not appropriate because the adoption of the Albanian proposed resolution did not involve the admission or expulsion of a member. Rather it concerned only credentials and Taiwan had never been a member.[4] They argued there was only one Chinese state that was a member. Any other Chinese state would have to apply for membership in accordance with the Charter.[4]

On 25 October 1971, the voting took place. In the first vote held, the Assembly rejected the U.S. backed proposal that the matter would require a supermajority vote — the 'important question motion' [A/L.632 and Add.1 and 2].[8] The Assembly then voted on a separate U.S. proposal that the words "and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupied at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it" be removed from the draft resolution A/L.630 and Add.1 and 2. The U.S. representative suggested that this motion, if adopted, would "have the effect of welcoming the PRC to the General Assembly and the Security Council, while at the same time not affecting the representation of the ROC in this hall".[8] The motion was rejected by a vote of 61 to 51, with 16 abstentions.[8]

At this point the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the ROC, Chow Shu-Kai, stated "in view of the frenzied and irrational manners that have been exhibited in this hall, the delegation of the Republic of China has now decided not to take part in any further proceedings of this General Assembly."[8] He said the "ideals upon which the United Nations was founded and which the General Assembly has now been betrayed".[8]

The Assembly then adopted draft Albanian proposed resolution A/L.630 and Add.1 and 2, by a roll-call vote of 76 to 35, with 17 abstentions, as Resolution 2758.[2] The Beijing government began representing China at the UN from 15 November 1971 and its delegates were seated at the UN Security Council meeting held on 23 November 1971, the first such meeting where representatives of the Beijing government represented China.[4]

## Votes[edit]

Vote  | Tally  | States  | Percent of members  | Percent of votes

|
|
|
|

In favour  | 76  | Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Bhutan, Botswana, Bulgaria, Burma, Burundi, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Cameroon, Canada, Ceylon, Chile, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Kuwait, Kingdom of Laos, Libyan Arab Republic, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Nepal, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, People's Democratic Republic of Yemen, People's Republic of the Congo, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, Sudan, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia  | 59.37%  | 68.46%
Against  | 35  | Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo (Democratic Republic of), Costa Rica, Dahomey, Dominican Republic, EI Salvador, Gabon, Gambia, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Ivory Coast, Japan, Khmer Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malta, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Paraguay, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Swaziland, United States of America, Upper Volta, Uruguay, Venezuela  | 27.34%  | 31.53%
Abstain  | 17  | Argentina, Bahrain, Barbados, Colombia, Cyprus, Fiji, Greece, Indonesia, Jamaica, Jordan, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Panama, Qatar, Spain, Thailand  | 13.28%  | X
Total  | 128  |  | 100%  | 100%
Source: Resolution 2758 voting record[9]

## Later developments[edit]

On 21 September 2007, the UN General Assembly rejected Taiwan's membership bid to "join the UN under the name of Taiwan", citing Resolution 2758 as acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China.[10] The UN General Assembly and its General Committee's recommendations on the "Taiwan question" reflected long-standing UN policy and is mirrored in other documents promulgated by the United Nations.[11][12][13] For example, the UN's "Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties, Handbook" (2003) states:

> ...regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated in resolution 2758 (XXVI) of the General Assembly of 25 October 1971 on the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations. The General Assembly decided to recognize the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations. Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary.[14]

## Interpretation disagreements[edit]

### United States[edit]

Further information: Three Communiqués, Taiwan Relations Act, and Six Assurances

The US's official policy is to recognize the PRC government as "the sole legal government of China", and "it acknowledged the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China".[15] While keeping diplomatic relations with the PRC, the US expects that "the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means".[16][17] The US "would continue to maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan".[15] According to a 2014 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, the US administrations have not explicitly stated a position on the political status of Taiwan.[18]

In April 2024, US State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary Mark Lambert spoke at a German Marshall Fund (GMF) seminar, saying that "Resolution 2758 does not endorse, is not equivalent to, and does not reflect a consensus for the PRC's 'one China' principle".[19] Lambert added that the Chinese government "mischaracterizes the resolution by falsely conflating it with China’s ‘one China’ principle and wrongly asserts that it reflects an international consensus for its ‘one China’ principle."[20][21] In May 2024, State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said that the US's 'one China' policy "has not changed".[22]

According to some analysts at the GMF, Resolution 2758 solved the issue of "China's representation" in the United Nations—but it left the issue of Taiwan's representation unresolved.[23][19]

## See also[edit]

* China and the United Nations
* United Nations General Assembly resolution
* United Nations General Assembly Resolution 505

## References[edit]

1. ^ "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter IV: The General Assembly". Archived from the original on 28 November 2010. Retrieved 23 December 2010.
2. ^ a b UN General Assembly (1971). "Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations". Resolutions Adopted by the General Assembly During Its 26th Session, 21 September-22 December 1971: 2. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
3. ^ "Treaty of Peace with Japan" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa United Nations (31 December 1971). Yearbook of the United Nations 1971. United Nations. pp. 126–128, 136. ISBN 978-92-1-060198-6. Archived from the original on 26 November 2023. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
5. ^ Albania; Algeria; Ceylon; Cuba; Guinea, Equatorial; Guinea; Iraq; Mali; Mauritania; Nepal; Pakistan; People's Democratic Republic of Yemen; People's Republic of the Congo; Romania; Somalia (25 September 1971). "Restoration of the lawful rights of People's Republic of China in the United Nations: draft resolution / Albania, Algeria, Ceylon, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea, Iraq, Mali, Mauritania, Nepal, Pakistan, People's Democratic Republic of Yemen, People's Republic of the Congo, Romania, Somalia, Syrian Arab Republic, Sudan, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen, Yugoslavia and Zambia". United Nations. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
6. ^ Australia; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; El Salvador; Fiji; Gambia; Guatemala; Haiti; Honduras; Japan; Lesotho; Liberia; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Philippines; Swaziland; Thailand; United States; Uruguay (29 September 1971). "Restoration of the lawful rights of People's Republic of China in the United Nations: draft resolution /: Australia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Fiji, Gambia, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Japan, Lesotho, Liberia, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Philippines. Swaziland, Thailand, United States of America and Uruguay". United Nations. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2024.`{{cite journal}}`: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
7. ^ Australia; Chad; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; Fiji; Gambia; Haiti; Honduras; Japan; Lesotho; Liberia; New Zealand; Philippines; Swaziland; Thailand; United States; Uruguay (29 September 1971). "Restoration of the lawful rights of People's Republic of China in the United Nations: draft resolution /: Australia, Chad, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Gambia, Haiti, Honduras, Japan, Lesotho, Liberia, New Zealand, Philippines, Swaziland, Thailand, United States of America and Uruguay". United Nations. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2023.`{{cite journal}}`: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
8. ^ a b c d e United Nations (1974). General Assembly, 26th session: 1976th plenary meeting, Monday, 25 October 1971, New York. pp. 33–35, 40. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
9. ^ "General Assembly, 26th session : 1976th plenary meeting, Monday, 25 October 1971, New York (A/PV.1976)". United Nations Digital Library. 1974. p. 41\. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
10. ^ "GENERAL ASSEMBLY ADOPTS WORK PROGRAMME FOR SIXTY-SECOND SESSION, REJECTS BID TO INCLUDE AGENDA ITEM ON TAIWAN | UN Press". press.un.org. Archived from the original on 29 December 2023. Retrieved 29 December 2023.
11. ^ Tribunal, UN Administrative (21 November 1996). "Administrative Tribunal judgement no. 778 :: case no. 841, Chu against the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Board". United Nations. Archived from the original on 15 December 2023. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
12. ^ "Secretary-General's press conference | United Nations Secretary-General". www.un.org. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
13. ^ "Highlight 9 July 2008 | United Nations Secretary-General". www.un.org. Archived from the original on 24 May 2024. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
14. ^ ""Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties, Handbook", United Nations, 2003" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 March 2012. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
15. ^ a b Governments of United States of America and the People's Republic of China (17 August 1982). US–PRC Joint Communique, August 17, 1982 - via Wikisource.
16. ^ Congress of the United States (10 April 1979). Taiwan Relations Act - via Wikisource.
17. ^ Kan, Shirley A.; Morrison, Wayne M. (4 January 2013). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4\. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 December 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
18. ^ Kan, Shirley A. (10 October 2014). "China/Taiwan: Evolution of the "One China" Policy—Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 39\. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 April 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
19. ^ a b Glaser, Bonnie S.; deLisle, Jacques (30 April 2024). "Exposing the PRC's Distortion of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to Press its Claim Over Taiwan". German Marshall Fund. Archived from the original on 30 April 2024. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
20. ^ "US official raps China over UN Resolution 2758". Taipei Times. 1 May 2024. Archived from the original on 1 May 2024. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
21. ^ Ching, Nike (28 May 2024). "US refutes China's characterization of UN Resolution 2758". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 29 May 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
22. ^ Miller, Matthew (28 May 2024). "Department Press Briefing – May 28, 2024". United States Department of State. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
23. ^ Drun, Jessica; Glaser, Bonnie S. (24 March 2022). "The Distortion of UN Resolution 2758 and Limits on Taiwan's Access to the United Nations". German Marshall Fund. Archived from the original on 29 December 2022. Retrieved 29 December 2022.

## External links[edit]

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758

* Original text of Resolution 2758 (XXVI)
* Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations signed and ratified by Republic of China
* Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations (continued)

* v
* t
* e

United Nations

* Secretary-General: António Guterres
* Deputy Secretary-General: Amina J. Mohammed
* General Assembly President:  Dennis Francis

UN System|

| Charter|

* Preamble

|

Principal organs|

* Secretariat
* Secretary-General (selections)
* Deputy Secretary-General
* Under-Secretary-General
* General Assembly
* President
* International Court of Justice
* Statute
* Security Council
* Elections
* Members
* President
* Economic and Social Council
* President
* Trusteeship Council

Funds, programmes,
and other bodies

* Culture of Peace
* ITC
* IPCC
* IAEA
* MINURSO
* UNAIDS
* SCSL
* UNCTAD
* UNCITRAL
* UNCDF
* UNDGC
* UNDP
* UNDPO
* peacekeeping
* UNEP
* OzonAction
* UNEP/GRID-Arendal
* UNEP-WCMC
* UNFPA
* UN-HABITAT
* OHCHR
* UNHCR
* UNHRC
* UNICEF
* UNICRI
* UNIDIR
* UNITAR
* UN-Oceans
* UNODC
* UNOPS
* UNOSAT
* UNRISD
* UNRWA
* UNSDG
* UNSSC
* UNU
* UNU-OP
* UNU-CRIS
* UNV
* UN Women
* WFP

Specialized agencies

* FAO
* ICAO
* IFAD
* ILO
* IMF
* IMO
* IOM
* ITU
* UNESCO
* UNIDO
* UN Tourism
* UPU
* WFEO
* WHO
* WIPO
* WMO
* World Bank Group
* IBRD
* IDA
* IFC

Secretariat offices
and departments|

* Headquarters
* Secretariat Building
* Conference Building
* General Assembly Building
* Envoy on Youth
* Spokesperson for the Secretary-General
* Geneva
* Palace of Nations
* Nairobi
* Vienna
* Economic and Social Affairs
* Political and Peacebuilding Affairs
* Dag Hammarskjöld Library
* Safety and Security
* Palestinian Rights
* Peace Operations
* Internal Oversight
* Legal Affairs
* Developing Countries
* Sport for Development and Peace
* Disarmament Affairs
* Outer Space Affairs
* Partnerships
* Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
* UN organizations by location
* Sexual Violence in Conflict

Members
and observers|

* Full members
* Founding members
* Security Council Permanent members
* Permanent representatives to the UN
* list
* General Assembly Observers
* European Union

History|

| Preceding years|

* International Telegraph Union
* Universal Postal Union
* International Peace Conference
* Permanent Court of Arbitration
* Office international d'hygiène publique
* League of Nations
* archives
* charter
* organization
* members

|

Preparatory years|

* London Declaration (1941)
* Atlantic Charter (1941)
* Declaration by United Nations (1942)
* Moscow Conference (1943)
* Tehran Conference (1943)
* Dumbarton Oaks Conference (1944)
* Yalta Conference (1945)
* Conference on International Organization (1945)

Activities|

* Peacekeeping
* missions
* timeline
* governed territories
* UNPOL
* Universal Declaration of Human Rights
* drafting
* Human Rights Day
* Enlargement
* Convention on the Rights of the Child
* committee
* Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
* World Heritage Convention

Resolutions|

* Security Council vetoes
* General Assembly
* 66th
* 67th
* Security Council
* Cyprus
* Iran
* Iraq
* Israel
* Lebanon
* Nagorno-Karabakh
* North Korea
* Palestine
* Syria
* Western Sahara
* Yemen

Elections|

* Secretary-General
* 2021
* 2016
* International Court of Justice
* 2023
* 2022
* 2021
* 2020
* 2017
* 2014
* 2011
* General Assembly President (2016)
* Security Council (2016)

Related|

* Bretton Woods system
* CCISUA
* Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
* Criticism
* Delivering as One
* Drug control treaties
* Expulsion from the United Nations
* FICSA
* Flag
* Honour Flag
* Four Nations Initiative
* Genocide Convention
* UN Global Compact
* International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
* International Criminal Court
* International Narcotics Control Board
* International Day of Peace
* International Decade for a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence for the Children of the World
* International Years
* Interpreters
* UN laissez-passer
* Military Staff Committee
* Official languages
* Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
* Peacekeeping
* Canada
* Ralph Bunche Park
* SDG Publishers Compact
* Sustainable Development Goals
* United Nations Postal Administration
* UN Block By Block
* Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice
* Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Mandela Rules)
* Treaty Series
* Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
* Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
* UN Advisory Committee of Local Authorities
* UN Day
* Millennium Declaration
* Millennium Summit
* Security Council veto power
* UN reform
* Security Council reform
* UN Art Collection
* Security Council mural
* UN Federal Credit Union
* UN International School
* Hanoi
* UN Mandate
* UN Memorial Cemetery Korea
* UN Sacco
* University for Peace
* Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action
* Woodrow Wilson Memorial
* World Federation of United Nations Associations

Other|

* Outline
* United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights
* United Nations Medal
* United Nations Radio
* UN television film series (1964–1966)
* UN Special magazine
* Ex Tempore magazine
* United Nations in popular culture
* UNICEF club
* Model UN
* Withdrawal from the United Nations
* Women in peacekeeping

World portal

* v
* t
* e

Cross-Strait relations

Diplomatic posts|

* Hong Kong Economic, Trade and Cultural Office (Taiwan)
* Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Hong Kong
* Macau Economic and Cultural Office (Taiwan)
* Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Macau

Diplomacy|

* Opening of the South-North route
* Restoration of Taiwan strait shipping
* Kinmen Agreement
* Wang–Koo summit
* Cross-Strait charter
* 2004 Taiwanese cross-Strait relations referendum
* May 17 Statement
* 2005 Pan–Blue visits to mainland China
* Cross-Strait high-level talks
* First Chen–Chiang summit
* Second Chen–Chiang summit
* Fourth Chen–Chiang summit
* Fifth Chen–Chiang summit
* Sixth Chen–Chiang summit
* Seventh Chen–Chiang summit
* Tuan Tuan and Yuan Yuan
* Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement
* Cross-Strait CEO Summit
* Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement
* Jinjiang–Kinmen Pipeline
* 2014 Wang–Zhang meetings
* 2015 Xi–Chu meeting
* Ma–Xi meeting
* Straits Forum
* Shanghai-Taipei City Forum
* Second Ma–Xi meeting

Conflicts|

* Chinese Civil War
* Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War
* Retreat of the government of the Republic of China to Taiwan
* Guanbi policy
* First Taiwan Strait Crisis
* Second Taiwan Strait Crisis
* Third Taiwan Strait Crisis
* Senkaku Islands
* Dispute

Incidents|

* Capture of the Tuapse
* Kashmir Princess
* Battle of Dong-Yin
* United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758
* Project National Glory
* Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations
* CAAC Flight 296
* China Airlines Flight 334
* 1987 Lieyu massacre
* Min Ping Yu No. 5540 incident
* Min Ping Yu No. 5202
* 1990 Guangzhou Baiyun airport collisions
* Qiandao Lake incident
* China Airlines Flight 611
* Sunflower Student Movement
* Braga incident
* Anti-Black Box Curriculum Movement
* Wang Liqiang
* Freedom pineapples
* 2021 Solomon Islands unrest
* 2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan
* 2023 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan
* 2024 Kinmen Chinese motorboat capsizing incident

Legislation|

* Cross-Strait Act
* Proposed National Unification Promotion Law
* Anti-Secession Law
* Anti-Infiltration Act

Organizations|

* All-China Federation of Taiwan Compatriots
* Alumni Association of Huangpu Military Academy
* Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits
* Association for Tourism Exchange Across the Taiwan Straits
* Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs
* China Council for the Promotion of Peaceful National Reunification
* Cross-Straits Common Market Foundation
* Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Culture Forum
* Cross-Strait Peace Forum
* Grand Alliance for China's Reunification under the Three Principles of the People
* Lienchiang Cross-Strait Matters Forum
* Mainland Affairs Council
* National Unification Council
* Straits Exchange Foundation
* Taiwan Affairs Office
* Taiwan Competitiveness Forum
* Taiwan Strait Tourism Association

Concepts|

* 1992 Consensus
* China Circle
* Chinese unification
* Chinese nationalism
* Chinese irredentism
* Chinese Taipei
* Cross-Strait Economic Zone
* Dang Guo
* Four Noes and One Without
* Greater China
* Han chauvinism
* One China
* One-China policy
* One Country on Each Side
* One country, two systems
* Propaganda in China
* Cross-Strait propaganda
* Republic of China on Taiwan
* Self-determination
* Socialist ideology of the Kuomintang
* Socialism with Chinese characteristics
* Special non-state-to-state relations
* Six Assurances
* Taiwan, China
* Two Chinas
* Three Noes
* Three Links
* Taiwan consensus
* Taiwan independence movement
* Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan
* United front in Taiwan
* Under the Roof of One China
* Xi Jinping Thought
* Zhonghua minzu

Related|

* Fujian–Taiwan relationship
* Hong Kong–Taiwan relations
* Hong Kong–Taiwan Economic and Cultural Co-operation and Promotion Council
* Taiwan–Hong Kong Economic and Cultural Co-operation Council
* Hong Kong and Kowloon Trades Union Council
* Pro-ROC camp
* Chinese Travel Document
* Exit & Entry Permit
* Mainland Travel Permit for Taiwan Residents
* Cross-strait language database
* ECFA Debate
* HMS Aurora (12)
* China and the United Nations
* China and the World Bank
* Chinese intelligence activity abroad
* Chinese information operations and information warfare
* Chinese Soviet Republic
* Freedom of religion in China
* Foreign relations of China
* Timeline of diplomatic relations with China
* Political status of Taiwan
* Foreign relations of Taiwan
* Opinion polling on Taiwanese identity
* Timeline of diplomatic relations with Taiwan
* Geostrategy in Taiwan
* Anti-Communist Hero
* Milk Tea Alliance
* Taishang
* G3 Beijing–Taipei Expressway
* G99 Taiwan Ring Expressway
* China National Highway 228 (Taiwan)
* Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission
* Tibet Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama
* The World Turned Upside Down
* Go and Reclaim the Mainland

Category:Cross-Strait relations
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template