Water on terrestrial planets of the Solar System

The presence of water on the terrestrial planets of the Solar System (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, and the closely related Earth's Moon) varies with each planetary body, with the exact origins remaining unclear. Additionally, the terrestrial dwarf planet Ceres is known to have water ice on its surface.

## Water inventories

[edit]

### Mercury

[edit]

Main article: Geology of Mercury § High-albedo polar patches and possible presence of ice

Due to its proximity to the Sun and lack of visible water on its surface, the planet Mercury had been thought of as a non-volatile planet. Data retrieved from the Mariner 10 mission found evidence of hydrogen (H), helium (He), and oxygen (O) in Mercury's exosphere.[1] Volatiles have also been found near the polar regions.[2] MESSENGER, however, sent back data from multiple on-board instruments that led scientists to the conclusion that Mercury was volatile rich.[3][4][5] Mercury is rich in potassium (K) which has been suggested as a proxy for volatile depletion on the planetary body. This leads to assumption that Mercury could have accreted water on its surface, relative to that of Earth if its proximity had not been so near that of the Sun.[6]

### Venus

[edit]

See also: Atmosphere of Venus

The current Venusian atmosphere has only ~200 mg/kg H2O(g) in its atmosphere and the pressure and temperature regime makes water unstable on its surface. Nevertheless, assuming that early Venus's H2O had a ratio between deuterium (heavy hydrogen, 2H) and hydrogen (1H) similar to Earth's Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW) of 1.6×10−4,[7] the current D/H ratio in the Venusian atmosphere of 1.9×10−2, at nearly ×120 of Earth's, may indicate that Venus had a much larger H2O inventory.[8] While the large disparity between terrestrial and Venusian D/H ratios makes any estimation of Venus's geologically ancient water budget difficult,[9] its mass may have been at least 0.3% of Earth's hydrosphere.[8] Estimates based on Venus's levels of deuterium suggest that the planet has lost anywhere from 4 metres (13 ft) of surface water up to "an Earth's ocean's worth".[10]

### Earth

[edit]

See also: Water distribution on Earth

Earth's hydrosphere contains ~1.46×1021 kg (3.22×1021 lb) of H2O and sedimentary rocks contain ~0.21×1021 kg (4.6×1020 lb), for a total crustal inventory of ~1.67×1021 kg (3.68×1021 lb) of H2O. The mantle inventory is poorly constrained in the range of 0.5×1021–4×1021 kg (1.1×1021–8.8×1021 lb). Therefore, the bulk inventory of H2O on Earth can be conservatively estimated as 0.04% of Earth's mass (~2.3×1021 kg (5.1×1021 lb)).

#### Earth's Moon

[edit]

Main article: Lunar water

Recent observation made by a number of spacecraft confirmed significant amounts of lunar water. The secondary ion mass spectrometer (SIMS) measured H2O as well as other possible volatiles in lunar volcanic glass bubbles. In these volcanic glasses, 4-46 ppm by weight (wt) of H2O was found and then modeled to have been 260-745 ppm wt prior to the lunar volcanic eruptions.[11] SIMS also found lunar water in the rock samples the Apollo astronauts returned to Earth. These rock samples were tested in three different ways and all came to the same conclusion that the Moon contains water.[12][13][14][15]

There are three main data sets for water abundance on the lunar surface: highland samples, KREEP samples, and pyroclastic glass samples. Highlands samples were estimated for the lunar magma ocean at 1320-5000 ppm wt of H2O in the beginning.[16] The urKREEP sample estimates a 130-240 ppm wt of H2O, which is similar to the findings in the current Highland samples (before modeling).[17] Pyroclastic glass sample beads were used to estimate the water content in the mantle source and the bulk silicate Moon. The mantle source was estimated at 110 ppm wt of H2O and the bulk silicate Moon contained 100-300 ppm wt of H2O.[18][17]

### Mars

[edit]

Main article: Water on Mars

A significant amount of surface hydrogen has been observed globally by the Mars Odyssey GRS.[19] Stoichiometrically estimated water mass fractions indicate that—when free of carbon dioxide—the near surface at the poles consists almost entirely of water covered by a thin veneer of fine material.[19] This is reinforced by MARSIS observations, with an estimated 1.6×106 km3 (3.8×105 cu mi) of water at the southern polar region with Water Equivalent to a Global layer (WEG) 11 metres (36 ft) deep.[20] Additional observations at both poles suggest the total WEG to be 30 m (98 ft), while the Mars Odyssey NS observations places the lower bound at ~14 cm (5.5 in) depth.[21] Geomorphic evidence favors significantly larger quantities of surface water over geologic history, with WEG as deep as 500 m (1,600 ft).[21] The current atmospheric reservoir of water, though important as a conduit, is insignificant in volume with the WEG no more than 10 μm (0.00039 in).[21] Since the typical surface pressure of the current atmosphere (~6 hPa (0.087 psi)[22]) is less than the triple point of H2O, liquid water is unstable on the surface unless present in sufficiently large volumes. Furthermore, the average global temperature is ~220 K (−53 °C; −64 °F), even below the eutectic freezing point of most brines.[22] For comparison, the highest diurnal surface temperatures at the two MER sites have been ~290 K (17 °C; 62 °F).[23]

## Accretion of water by Earth and Mars

[edit]

Main article: Origin of water on Earth

The D/H isotopic ratio is a primary constraint on the source of H2O of terrestrial planets. Comparison of the planetary D/H ratios with those of carbonaceous chondrites and comets enables a tentative determination of the source of H2O. The best constraints for accreted H2O are determined from non-atmospheric H2O, as the D/H ratio of the atmospheric component may be subject to rapid alteration by the preferential loss of H [22] unless it is in isotopic equilibrium with surface H2O. Earth's VSMOW D/H ratio of 1.6×10−4[7] and modeling of impacts suggest that the cometary contribution to crustal water was less than 10%. However, much of the water could be derived from Mercury-sized planetary embryos that formed in the asteroid belt beyond 2.5 AU.[24] Mars's original D/H ratio as estimated by deconvolving the atmospheric and magmatic D/H components in Martian meteorites (e.g., QUE 94201), is ×(1.9+/-0.25) the VSMOW value.[24] The higher D/H and impact modeling (significantly different from Earth due to Mars's smaller mass) favor a model where Mars accreted a total of 6% to 27% the mass of the current Earth hydrosphere, corresponding respectively to an original D/H between ×1.6 and ×1.2 the SMOW value.[24] The former enhancement is consistent with roughly equal asteroidal and cometary contributions, while the latter would indicate mostly asteroidal contributions.[24] The corresponding WEG would be 0.6–2.7 km (0.37–1.68 mi), consistent with a 50% outgassing efficiency to yield ~500 m (1,600 ft) WEG of surface water.[24] Comparing the current atmospheric D/H ratio of ×5.5 SMOW ratio with the primordial ×1.6 SMOW ratio suggests that ~50 m (160 ft) of has been lost to space via solar wind stripping.[24]

The cometary and asteroidal delivery of water to accreting Earth and Mars has significant caveats, even though it is favored by D/H isotopic ratios.[9] Key issues include:[9]

1. The higher D/H ratios in Martian meteorites could be a consequence of biased sampling since Mars may have never had an effective crustal recycling process
2. Earth's Primitive upper mantle estimate of the 187Os/188Os isotopic ratio exceeds 0.129, significantly greater than that of carbonaceous chondrites, but similar to anhydrous ordinary chondrites. This makes it unlikely that planetary embryos compositionally similar to carbonaceous chondrites supplied water to Earth
3. Earth's atmospheric content of Ne is significantly higher than would be expected had all the rare gases and H2O been accreted from planetary embryos with carbonaceous chondritic compositions.[25]

An alternative to the cometary and asteroidal delivery of H2O would be the accretion via physisorption during the formation of the terrestrial planets in the solar nebula. This would be consistent with the thermodynamic estimate of around two Earth masses of water vapor within 3AU of the solar accretionary disk, which would exceed by a factor of 40 the mass of water needed to accrete the equivalent of 50 Earth hydrospheres (the most extreme estimate of Earth's bulk H2O content) per terrestrial planet.[9] Even though much of the nebular H2O(g) may be lost due to the high temperature environment of the accretionary disk, it is possible for physisorption of H2O on accreting grains to retain nearly three Earth hydrospheres of H2O at 500 K (227 °C; 440 °F) temperatures.[9] This adsorption model would effectively avoid the 187Os/188Os isotopic ratio disparity issue of distally-sourced H2O. However, the current best estimate of the nebular D/H ratio spectroscopically estimated with Jovian and Saturnian atmospheric CH4 is only 2.1×10−5, a factor of 8 lower than Earth's VSMOW ratio.[9] It is unclear how such a difference could exist, if physisorption were indeed the dominant form of H2O accretion for Earth in particular and the terrestrial planets in general.

## See also

[edit]

* Extraterrestrial liquid water § Liquid water in the Solar System
* Ocean world

## References

[edit]

1. ^ Broadfoot, A. L.; Shemansky, D. E.; Kumar, S. (1976). "Mariner 10: Mercury atmosphere". Geophysical Research Letters. 3 (10): 577–580. Bibcode:1976GeoRL...3..577B. doi:10.1029/gl003i010p00577. ISSN 0094-8276.
2. ^ Slade, M. A.; Butler, B. J.; Muhleman, D. O. (1992-10-23). "Mercury Radar Imaging: Evidence for Polar Ice". Science. 258 (5082): 635–640. Bibcode:1992Sci...258..635S. doi:10.1126/science.258.5082.635. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17748898. S2CID 34009087.
3. ^ Evans, Larry G.; Peplowski, Patrick N.; Rhodes, Edgar A.; Lawrence, David J.; McCoy, Timothy J.; Nittler, Larry R.; Solomon, Sean C.; Sprague, Ann L.; Stockstill-Cahill, Karen R.; Starr, Richard D.; Weider, Shoshana Z. (2012-11-02). "Major-element abundances on the surface of Mercury: Results from the MESSENGER Gamma-Ray Spectrometer". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 117 (E12): n/a. Bibcode:2012JGRE..117.0L07E. doi:10.1029/2012je004178. ISSN 0148-0227.
4. ^ Peplowski, Patrick N.; Lawrence, David J.; Evans, Larry G.; Klima, Rachel L.; Blewett, David T.; Goldsten, John O.; Murchie, Scott L.; McCoy, Timothy J.; Nittler, Larry R.; Solomon, Sean C.; Starr, Richard D. (2015). "Constraints on the abundance of carbon in near-surface materials on Mercury: Results from the MESSENGER Gamma-Ray Spectrometer". Planetary and Space Science. 108: 98–107. Bibcode:2015P&SS..108...98P. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.01.008. ISSN 0032-0633.
5. ^ Peplowski, Patrick N.; Klima, Rachel L.; Lawrence, David J.; Ernst, Carolyn M.; Denevi, Brett W.; Frank, Elizabeth A.; Goldsten, John O.; Murchie, Scott L.; Nittler, Larry R.; Solomon, Sean C. (2016-03-07). "Remote sensing evidence for an ancient carbon-bearing crust on Mercury". Nature Geoscience. 9 (4): 273–276. Bibcode:2016NatGe...9..273P. doi:10.1038/ngeo2669. ISSN 1752-0894.
6. ^ Greenwood, James P.; Karato, Shun-ichiro; Vander Kaaden, Kathleen E.; Pahlevan, Kaveh; Usui, Tomohiro (2018-07-26). "Water and Volatile Inventories of Mercury, Venus, the Moon, and Mars". Space Science Reviews. 214 (5): 92. Bibcode:2018SSRv..214...92G. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0526-1. ISSN 0038-6308. S2CID 125706287.
7. ^ a b National Institute of Standards and Technology (2005), Report of Investigation
8. ^ a b Kulikov, Yu. N.; Lammer, H.; Lichtenegger, H. I. M.; Terada, N.; Ribas, I.; Kolb, C.; Langmayr, D.; Lundin, R.; Guinan, E. F.; Barabash, S.; Biernat, H. K. (2006). "Atmospheric and water loss from early Venus". Planetary and Space Science. 54 (13–14): 1425–1444. Bibcode:2006P&SS...54.1425K. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.538.9059. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2006.04.021.
9. ^ a b c d e f Drake, M. J. (2005). "Origin of water in the terrestrial planets". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 40 (4): 519–527. Bibcode:2005M&PS...40..519D. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00960.x.
10. ^ Owen, (2007), news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/11/071128-venus-earth_2.html
11. ^ Saal, Alberto E.; Hauri, Erik H.; Cascio, Mauro L.; Van Orman, James A.; Rutherford, Malcolm C.; Cooper, Reid F. (2008). "Volatile content of lunar volcanic glasses and the presence of water in the Moon's interior". Nature. 454 (7201): 192–195. Bibcode:2008Natur.454..192S. doi:10.1038/nature07047. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 18615079. S2CID 4394004.
12. ^ Boyce, Jeremy W.; Liu, Yang; Rossman, George R.; Guan, Yunbin; Eiler, John M.; Stolper, Edward M.; Taylor, Lawrence A. (2010). "Lunar apatite with terrestrial volatile abundances" (PDF). Nature. 466 (7305): 466–469. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..466B. doi:10.1038/nature09274. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 20651686. S2CID 4405054.
13. ^ Greenwood, James P.; Itoh, Shoichi; Sakamoto, Naoya; Warren, Paul; Taylor, Lawrence; Yurimoto, Hisayoshi (2011-01-09). "Hydrogen isotope ratios in lunar rocks indicate delivery of cometary water to the Moon". Nature Geoscience. 4 (2): 79–82. Bibcode:2011NatGe...4...79G. doi:10.1038/ngeo1050. hdl:2115/46873. ISSN 1752-0894.
14. ^ McCubbin, Francis M.; Vander Kaaden, Kathleen E.; Tartèse, Romain; Klima, Rachel L.; Liu, Yang; Mortimer, James; Barnes, Jessica J.; Shearer, Charles K.; Treiman, Allan H.; Lawrence, David J.; Elardo, Stephen M. (2015a). "Magmatic volatiles (H, C, N, F, S, Cl) in the lunar mantle, crust, and regolith: Abundances, distributions, processes, and reservoirs". American Mineralogist. 100 (8–9): 1668–1707. Bibcode:2015AmMin.100.1668M. doi:10.2138/am-2015-4934ccbyncnd. ISSN 0003-004X.
15. ^ McCubbin, Francis M.; Vander Kaaden, Kathleen E.; Tartèse, Romain; Boyce, Jeremy W.; Mikhail, Sami; Whitson, Eric S.; Bell, Aaron S.; Anand, Mahesh; Franchi, Ian A.; Wang, Jianhua; Hauri, Erik H. (2015b). "Experimental investigation of F, Cl, and OH partitioning between apatite and Fe-rich basaltic melt at 1.0–1.2 GPa and 950–1000 °C". American Mineralogist. 100 (8–9): 1790–1802. Bibcode:2015AmMin.100.1790M. doi:10.2138/am-2015-5233. ISSN 0003-004X. S2CID 100688307.
16. ^ Hui, Hejiu; Guan, Yunbin; Chen, Yang; Peslier, Anne H.; Zhang, Youxue; Liu, Yang; Flemming, Roberta L.; Rossman, George R.; Eiler, John M.; Neal, Clive R.; Osinski, Gordon R. (2017-09-01). "A heterogeneous lunar interior for hydrogen isotopes as revealed by the lunar highlands samples". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 473: 14–23. Bibcode:2017E&PSL.473...14H. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.029. ISSN 0012-821X.
17. ^ a b Hauri, Erik H.; Saal, Alberto E.; Rutherford, Malcolm J.; Van Orman, James A. (2015). "Water in the Moon's interior: Truth and consequences". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 409: 252–264. Bibcode:2015E&PSL.409..252H. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.053. ISSN 0012-821X.
18. ^ Chen, Yang; Zhang, Youxue; Liu, Yang; Guan, Yunbin; Eiler, John; Stolper, Edward M. (2015). "Water, fluorine, and sulfur concentrations in the lunar mantle" (PDF). Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 427: 37–46. Bibcode:2015E&PSL.427...37C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.046. ISSN 0012-821X.
19. ^ a b Boynton, W. V.; et al. (2007). "Concentration of H, Si, Cl, K, Fe, and Th in the low- and mid-latitude regions of Mars". Journal of Geophysical Research. 112 (E12): E12S99. Bibcode:2007JGRE..11212S99B. doi:10.1029/2007JE002887.
20. ^ Plaut, J. J.; et al. (2007). "Subsurface Radar Sounding of the South Polar Layered Deposits of Mars". Science. 316 (5821): 92–95. Bibcode:2007Sci...316...92P. doi:10.1126/science.1139672. PMID 17363628. S2CID 23336149.
21. ^ a b c Feldman, W. C. (2004). "Global distribution of near-surface hydrogen on Mars". Journal of Geophysical Research. 109 (E9): E09006. Bibcode:2004JGRE..109.9006F. doi:10.1029/2003JE002160.
22. ^ a b c Jakosky, B. M.; Phillips, R. J. (2001). "Mars' volatile and climate history". Nature. 412 (6843): 237–244. Bibcode:2001Natur.412..237J. doi:10.1038/35084184. PMID 11449285.
23. ^ Spanovich, N.; Smith, M. D.; Smith, P. H.; Wolff, M. J.; Christensen, P. R.; Squyres, S. W. (2006). "Surface and near-surface atmospheric temperatures for the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites". Icarus. 180 (2): 314–320. Bibcode:2006Icar..180..314S. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.09.014.
24. ^ a b c d e f Lunine, Jonathan I.; Chambers, J.; Morbidelli, A.; Leshin, L. A. (2003). "The origin of water on Mars". Icarus. 165 (1): 1–8. Bibcode:2003Icar..165....1L. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00172-6.
25. ^ Morbidelli, A.; Chambers, J.; Lunine, Jonathan I.; Petit, J. M.; Robert, F.; Valsecchi, G. B.; Cyr, K. E. (2000). "Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the Earth". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 35 (6): 1309–1320. Bibcode:2000M&PS...35.1309M. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x.

* v
* t
* e

Solar System

* Sun
* Mercury
* Venus
* Earth
* Mars
* Ceres
* Jupiter
* Saturn
* Uranus
* Neptune
* Orcus
* Pluto
* Haumea
* Quaoar
* Makemake
* Gonggong
* Eris
* Sedna

| Planets and
dwarfs|

* Terrestrials
* Mercury
* Venus
* Earth
* Mars
* Giants
* Gas
* Jupiter
* Saturn
* Ice
* Uranus
* Neptune
* Dwarfs
* Ceres
* Orcus
* Pluto
* Haumea
* Quaoar
* Makemake
* Gonggong
* Eris
* Sedna

|

Moons|

* Earth
* Moon
* other near-Earth objects
* Mars
* Phobos
* Deimos
* Jupiter
* Ganymede
* Callisto
* Io
* Europa
* all 95
* Saturn
* Titan
* Rhea
* Iapetus
* Dione
* Tethys
* Enceladus
* Mimas
* Hyperion
* Phoebe
* all 146
* Uranus
* Titania
* Oberon
* Umbriel
* Ariel
* Miranda
* all 28
* Neptune
* Triton
* Proteus
* Nereid
* all 16
* Orcus
* Vanth
* Pluto
* Charon
* Nix
* Hydra
* Kerberos
* Styx
* Haumea
* Hiʻiaka
* Namaka
* Quaoar
* Weywot
* Makemake
* S/2015 (136472) 1
* Gonggong
* Xiangliu
* Eris
* Dysnomia

Rings|

* Jovian
* Saturnian (Rhean?)
* Charikloan
* Chironean
* Uranian
* Neptunian
* Haumean
* Quaoarian

Small
Solar
System
bodies|

* Comets
* Damocloids
* Meteoroids
* Minor planets
* names and meanings
* moons
* Planetesimal
* Planetary orbit-crossing minor planets
* Mercury
* Venus
* Earth
* Mars
* Jupiter
* Saturn
* Uranus
* Neptune
* Trojans
* Venus
* Earth
* Mars
* Jupiter
* Trojan camp
* Greek camp
* Saturn Moons
* Uranus
* Neptune
* Near-Earth objects
* Asteroid belt
* Asteroids
* Ceres
* Vesta
* Pallas
* Hygiea
* active
* first 1000
* families
* PHA
* exceptional
* Kirkwood gap
* Centaurs
* Neptune trojans
* Trans-Neptunian objects
* Kuiper belt
* Cubewanos
* Plutinos
* Detached objects
* Sednoids
* Scattered disc
* Oort cloud
* Hills cloud

| Hypothetical
objects|

* Fifth giant
* Nemesis
* Phaeton
* Planet Nine
* Planet V
* Planet X
* Subsatellites
* Theia
* Tyche
* Vulcan
* Vulcanoids

|

Exploration
(outline)|

* Colonization
* Discovery
* astronomy
* historical models
* timeline
* Space probes
* timeline
* list
* Human spaceflight
* space stations
* list
* programs
* Mercury
* Venus
* Moon
* mining
* Mars
* Ceres
* Asteroids
* mining
* Comets
* Jupiter
* Saturn
* Uranus
* Neptune
* Pluto
* Deep space

Formation
and
evolution|

* Star formation
* Accretion
* Accretion disk
* Excretion disk
* Circumplanetary disk
* Circumstellar disc
* Circumstellar envelope
* Coatlicue
* Cosmic dust
* Debris disk
* Detached object
* EXCEDE
* Exozodiacal dust
* Extraterrestrial materials
* Sample curation
* Sample-return mission
* Frost/Ice/Snow line
* Giant-impact hypothesis
* Gravitational collapse
* Hills cloud
* Hill sphere
* Interplanetary dust cloud
* Interplanetary medium/space
* Interstellar cloud
* Interstellar medium
* Interstellar space
* Kuiper belt
* Kuiper cliff
* Molecular cloud
* Nebular hypothesis
* Oort cloud
* Outer space
* Planet
* Disrupted
* Migration
* System
* Planetesimal
* Formation
* Merging stars
* Protoplanetary disk
* Ring system
* Roche limit
* vs. Hill sphere
* Rubble pile
* Scattered disc

Lists|

* Comets
* Possible dwarf planets
* Gravitationally rounded objects
* Minor planets
* Natural satellites
* Solar System models
* Solar System objects
* by size
* by discovery date
* Interstellar and circumstellar molecules

Related|

* Double planet
* Lagrangian points
* Moonlets
* Syzygy
* Tidal locking

* Outline of the Solar System
* Solar System portal
* Astronomy portal
* Earth sciences portal

Solar System → Local Interstellar Cloud → Local Bubble → Gould Belt → Orion Arm → Milky Way → Milky Way subgroup → Local Group → Local Sheet → Virgo Supercluster → Laniakea Supercluster → Local Hole → Observable universe → Universe
Each arrow (→) may be read as "within" or "part of".
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template