Internet Law

|  This page may qualify for speedy deletion because: almost nothing to learn from here; abandoned since 2020
If you disagree or intend to fix it, and you have not contributed to it before, you may remove this notice. If you have contributed before and disagree, please explain why on the discussion page, after adding {{hangon}} to the top of the . This will alert curators and custodians to your intention, and may permit you the time to write your explanation.

* * *

Before deleting check the discussion page, what links here, history (last edit), the page log, and Wikiversity:Deletions.

Link to any subpages this page might have

|

The study of Internet Law, also known as Cyberlaw, sits at the intersection of law, policy, internet and society. It is, and remains, a comparatively young field, albeit one which has rapidly matured. In the late 1990s, Internet law was accused of being the Law of the Horse — the sale of horses, regulation of animal welfare, accidents occuring to riders, their use as criminal getaway vehicles, and more, all concerned the law, but that did not (according to Judge Frank Easterbrook) mean that we needed a law of it.[1]

This Wiki is initially a project of the undergraduate class at the University College London Faculty of Laws.

## Core Topics in Internet Law

[edit | edit source]

## Core Internet Law Cases

[edit | edit source]

These should be created with roughly the same approach as existing Wikiversity Law Reports, with each titled 'Wikiversity Law Reports/Name of Parties'.

## References

[edit | edit source]

1. ↑ Lawrence Lessig, ‘The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review 501.