Aaron Persky recall, Santa Clara County, California (2018)

From Ballotpedia - Reading time: 35 min

Santa Clara Superior Court Judge recall
AaronPersky.jpg
Officeholders
Aaron Persky
Recall status
Recall approved
Recall election date
June 5, 2018
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2018
Recalls in California
California recall laws
Special district recalls
Recall reports

Santa Clara Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky was recalled on June 5, 2018. Cindy Seeley Hendrickson defeated Angela Storey to replace Persky.

Stanford University law professor Michele Dauber initiated the recall effort in June 2016 on the grounds that Persky was too lenient in his sentencing of Stanford student Brock Turner.

In a case that attracted national attention, Turner was arrested and charged with sexual assault in January 2015 after he was found lying on top of an unconscious woman on Stanford University's campus.[1] Turner was convicted of sexual assault, and Persky sentenced him to six months in jail, three years of probation, and registration as a sex offender. The maximum sentence for the charges was 14 years in person. The victim read an impact statement at his sentencing that was published by news outlets such as Buzzfeed and The Independent. Its publication was the catalyst for Persky's recall.

Recall supporters argued that Turner' sentence was too light and would negatively impact women's safety. Recall opponents argued that Persky acted appropriately during sentencing and that recalling a judge over one decision would violate judicial independence principles.

The recall election ballot had two parts: (1) a question about whether Persky should be recalled and (2) a list of nominees to succeed him.[2] Since a majority of voters voted to recall Persky, the nominee with the most votes, Hendrickson, was elected to the remainder of his term, which was slated to end in 2022.[3]

Persky and the campaign to recall him each submitted a statement to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters for inclusion on the ballot. Persky and Dauber also each formed a campaign committee: "Retain Judge Persky — No Recall" and the "Committee to Recall Judge Persky," respectively.[4]

The Persky recall election was the first judicial recall in any state to make the ballot since 1982, according to Joshua Spivak of The Recall Elections Blog. The last successful judicial recall in the country was in Wisconsin in 1977, and the last successful judicial recalls in California were in 1932.[5]

Click here to read more about the recall election's path to the ballot.

California voter? Here's what you need to know.
Recall ElectionJune 5, 2018
Candidate Filing DeadlineMarch 2, 2018
Registration DeadlineMay 21, 2018[6]
Absentee Application DeadlineMay 29, 2018[6]
Early Voting DeadlineAvailable from May 7, 2018, to June 5, 2018[7]
Polling locations: Go to this page to find early voting locations and your assigned precinct for election day.

Recall results[edit]

Aaron Persky recall, 2018
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Yes 61.6% 202,849
No 38.4% 126,459
Total Votes 329,308
Source: Santa Clara County elections


Aaron Persky recall (replacement candidate), 2018
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Cindy Seeley Hendrickson 68.0% 174,045
Angela Storey 32.0% 82,042
Total Votes 256,087
Source: Santa Clara County elections

Election updates[edit]

  • May 8, 2018: Persky holds a press conference to speak out against the recall effort.
  • May 1, 2018: The California Supreme Court rejects Persky's final appeal to stop the recall.[8]
  • March 26, 2018: The appellate court denies Persky's appeal to remove the recall election from the ballot.[9]
  • March 20, 2018: A state appellate court hears arguments in an appeal by Persky to remove the recall election from the June ballot.[10]
  • February 8, 2018: Attorney Angela Storey announces her candidacy for the recall election.[11]
  • February 6, 2018: The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approves the recall election for the June 5 ballot.[12]
  • October 2017: Attorney Cindy Seeley Hendrickson announces her candidacy for the recall election.[13]

Candidates[edit]

The following candidates filed to replace Persky.[14]

Cindy Seeley Hendrickson[edit]

Cindy Hendrickson.PNG

Twitter

Santa Clara County Assistant District Attorney Cindy Hendrickson ran to replace Persky by emphasizing her background in victim advocacy, experience as a prosecutor, and what she calls her sensitivity to implicit and explicit bias after growing up in a multiracial household.[15] She announced her campaign in October 2017.[13] Hendrickson donated to the Persky recall campaign and was endorsed by the recall effort's leader, Stanford law professor Michelle Dauber.[16]

Although she supported the recall, Hendrickson declined to express her views on the Brock Turner case or whether she believed that Persky erred in Turner's sentencing.[17] However, she did speak about her handling of sexual assault cases as a prosecutor, saying, "I felt like I really had an opportunity to make a difference not only in the lives of the victims but also in making the public more safe.”[15]

When asked about recalls in general, she said, " It's important that judges, who are making decisions about people's lives, that they reflect the values of the community they serve. If people in a community feel that a judge ceases or has never reflected those values, they have their right to use the tools of democracy."[16]

Hendrickson received her undergraduate degree from Stanford University and her J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles.[13]

Angela Storey[edit]

Angela Storey.PNG

Twitter

Attorney Angela Storey ran to replace Persky despite her opposition to his recall. She said her experience in civil and criminal law would make her a fair and qualified candidate to replace him if he was recalled. She announced her campaign in February 2018.[11] According to Persky ally LaDoris Cordell, recall opponents generally supported Storey.[16] Mercury News also endorsed her.[18]

Storey said she opposed the recall (despite being a victim of sexual assault in college) because of judicial independence principles and the possibility that judges would give harsher sentences to people of color if they feared recalls.[16]

"From my perspective, a judge's job is to make difficult choices and to make rulings that people aren't going to always agree with," she said. "We don't want our judges necessarily looking over their shoulders trying to gauge public opinion."[19] She said that Turner's sentence was within the law, but she declined to say whether she agreed with it. She also called the recall a “dangerous precedent” and said that voters should focus on changing laws when they disagree with outcomes rather than removing judges.[11]

Storey worked as a trial lawyer in the insurance, construction, and business law fields after being admitted to the California Bar in 2001. She joined her husband's practice, afterward known as Storey & Storey, in 2013 and practiced personal injury law. She received her undergraduate degree from the University of California, Los Angeles and her J.D. from Santa Clara Law School.[19]

Background[edit]

The case[edit]

Brock Turner was arrested on January 18, 2015, after two graduate students saw him lying on top of an unconscious and partially clothed woman behind a dumpster on the Stanford University campus.[20] Turner was found guilty of three felonies: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated woman, sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object, and sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object.[21]

Persky sentenced Turner to six months in county jail, three years of probation, and registration as a sex offender.[22] The maximum sentence for the charges of which Turner was convicted was 14 years in state prison. Prosecutors requested a sentence of six years in state prison, probation officers recommended six months in county jail, and Turner asked for four months in jail.[21]

Turner's victim, referred to as Emily Doe, read a victim impact statement at his sentencing. The statement was published by news outlets, including BuzzFeed News and the Independent, and was a catalyst for the recall campaign.[23][24][25]

Persky's career[edit]

Aaron Persky was appointed to the Superior Court of Santa Clara County by Democratic Gov. Gray Davis in September 2003. He was elected to a full term in 2004 and re-elected in 2010. He ran for re-election unopposed in 2016 and did not appear on the ballot.[26]

Similar cases to Turner decision[edit]

A central argument for the recall campaign was that Persky made five rulings similar to the Turner case where he showed bias toward white male athletes accused of assaulting women. Palo Alto Weekly, whose editorial board supported the recall, reviewed the five cases. The analysis can be read here.

The reporter conducting the analysis wrote:[27]

The five cases differ from the Turner case in that none went to a jury trial. All of the sentences except one were negotiated through plea bargains, meaning the district attorney's office and defense agreed to certain charges and punishments. In an interview with the Weekly, Persky described a judge's role in plea bargains as hands-off. It's rare for a judge to object to a plea deal on his or her own accord, he said.

The role of the probation department also differed across the cases. Some but not all of the cases had full probation reports, meaning the probation department interviewed the defendant and possibly the victim, conducted a risk assessment, reviewed the police report and made a formal sentencing recommendation to the judge. In two cases, Persky waived the referral to probation, meaning the report the department produced was limited. [28]

Timeline[edit]

  • January 18, 2015: Turner is arrested for sexual assault. He posts $150,000 bail and is released from jail later in the day.
  • January 28, 2015: Turner is charged and pleads not guilty to two counts of rape, two counts of penetration, and one count of assault with intent to rape.
  • October 7, 2015: The two rape charges are dismissed, and Turner is ordered to stand trial on the remaining charges in Santa Clara County Superior Court.
  • March 30, 2016: Turner is found guilty of the three remaining charges by a jury.
  • June 2, 2016: Persky sentences Turner to six months in jail and three years of probation and orders him to register as a sex offender.[29]
  • June 6, 2016: Dauber says she will start a recall campaign against Persky.[30]
  • June 9, 2016: Democratic political consultants Joe Trippi and John Shallman join the recall campaign team.
  • June 10, 2016: The California Legislative Women's Caucus announces that it will raise money for the recall campaign effort.[31]
  • September 2, 2016: Turner is released from jail, and the recall campaign holds a rally with 14 speakers, including Palo Alto Mayor Pat Burt, Senate Pro Tem Kevin De Leon, U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell, U.S. Rep. Jerry McNerney, U.S. Rep. Loretta Sanchez, California state Sen. James Beall Jr., and state Assembly member Nora Campos.[32]
  • December 19, 2016: Persky is cleared of misconduct by the California Commission on Judicial Performance, the state's judicial disciplinary agency.[33]
  • June 26, 2017: The recall campaign files a notice of intent to recall Persky.
  • August 9, 2017: The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters approves the recall petitions for signature gathering.
  • August 11, 2017: Judge Marjorie Laird Carter approves Persky's request for a temporary restraining order against the recall effort.
  • August 28, 2017: Judge Kay Tsenin lifts the temporary restraining order.
  • October 2017: Santa Clara County assistant district attorney Cindy Seeley Hendrickson announces her candidacy for the potential recall election and begins raising money for her campaign.[13]
  • January 11, 2018: The recall campaign submits its signatures to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters.[34]
  • January 23, 2018: The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters announces that it has verified enough signatures to qualify the recall for the June 5 ballot.[35]
  • February 6, 2018: The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approves the recall election for the June 5 ballot.[12]
  • February 8, 2018: Civil attorney Angela Storey announces her candidacy for the recall election.[11]
  • February 14, 2018: Dauber reports receiving an envelope containing white powder and a rape threat.[36]
  • March 1, 2018: Daniel Frisiello is arrested for sending white powder to Dauber, as well as to President Donald Trump's (R) son Donald Trump Jr., U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), actor and U.S. House candidate Antonio Sabato Jr. (R), and interim U.S. Attorney Nicola Hanna.[37]
  • March 20, 2018: A three-judge panel of California's 6th District Court of Appeal hears oral arguments in an appeal by Persky to remove the recall election from the June ballot.[10]
  • March 26, 2018: The appellate court rejects Persky's appeal to remove the recall from the ballot. According to the court, there was no "constitutional basis on which to delay the processing of the current recall petition."[9]
  • May 1, 2018: The California Supreme Court rejects Persky's final appeal to stop the recall.[8]
  • June 5, 2018: Recall election date[38]

Polls[edit]

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls

A KPIX/Survey USA poll released May 22, 2018, found that 49 percent of voters would vote to recall Persky, 36 percent were opposed to his recall, and 15 percent were undecided. Men supported Persky by a 3 percent margin, while women opposed him by a 26 percent margin. To replace Persky, 16 percent of voters favored Angela Storey, 15 percent favored Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, and 69 percent were undecided.[39]

An FM3 Research poll conducted from May 5-13, 2018, found that 46 percent of voters would vote to recall Persky, 33 percent were opposed to his recall, and 21 percent were undecided. Men supported Persky by a 7 percent margin, while women opposed him by a 30 percent margin. The poll surveyed 559 likely voters and had a margin of error of 4.1 percent.[40]

A KPIX/Survey USA poll released in March 2018 found that 56 percent of voters supported Persky's recall.[39]

A Sextant Strategies & Research poll found that 66 percent of respondents would vote to recall Persky. The poll, which surveyed 776 registered voters, was conducted from June 20-22, 2016.[41]

Campaign finance[edit]

As of May 5, 2018, the committee to recall Persky had raised more than $1 million. It raised $322,785.38 in 2016, $365,159.78 in 2017, $273,206.04 from January 2018 to April 21, 2018, and at least $232,000 in late April and early May 2018.

As of May 5, 2018, the committees to retain Persky, No Recall of Judge Persky and Retain Judge Persky — No Recall, had raised about $890,000 combined. No Recall of Judge Persky raised $188,735 from January 2018 to April 21, 2018. Retain Judge Persky — No Recall raised $254,291 from January 2018 to April 21, 2018 and $446,751.47 in 2017.[42]

Recall supporters[edit]

As of March 22, 2018, the following were listed on the Committee to Recall Judge Persky's website as supporters of the recall effort:[43]

Publications

  • Palo Alto Weekly Editorial Board
  • Verde Magazine of Palo Alto High School Editorial Board

Elected and appointed officials

  • Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
  • Rep. Karen Bass (D-CA)
  • Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA)
  • Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-CA)
  • Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA)
  • Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX)
  • Former Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA)
  • State Sen. Kevin de Leon (D)
  • State Sen. James Beall Jr. (D)
  • State Sen. Gerald Hill (D)
  • Assemblywoman Anna Caballero (D)
  • Assemblyman David Chiu (D)
  • Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes Eggman (D)
  • Assemblyman Tony Thurmond (D)
  • Former Assemblywoman Nora Campos (D)
  • California Board of Equalization Chairwoman Fiona Ma (D)
  • Santa Clara County Sheriff Laurie Smith
  • Santa Clara Valley Water District Board Director Barbara Keegan
  • Santa Clara Valley Water District Board Director Gary Kremen
  • West Valley Mission Community College District Trustee Adrienne Grey
  • West Valley Mission Community College District Trustee Randi Kinman
  • Santa Clara County Board of Education President Michael Chang
  • Santa Clara County Board of Education Vice President Rosemary Kamei
  • Santa Clara County Board of Education member Grace Mah
  • San Jose Vice Mayor Magdalena Carrasco
  • San Jose City Councillor Raul Peralez
  • San Jose City Councillor Donald Rocha
  • Gilroy City Councillor Peter Leroe-Munoz
  • Los Altos Hills Vice Mayor John Radford
  • Milpitas Mayor Rich Tran
  • Milpitas City Councillor Anthony Phan
  • Former Milpitas Mayor Bob Livengood
  • Monte Sereno City Councillor Curtis Rogers
  • Mountain View Mayor Lenny Siegel
  • Mountain View City Councillor Margaret Abe-Koga
  • Monte Sereno City Councillor Evert Wolsheimer
  • Palo Alto City Councillor Cory Wolbach
  • Former Palo Alto Mayor Patrick Burt
  • Saratoga City Councillor Rishi Kumar
  • Santa Clara City Councillor Dominic Caserta
  • Sunnyvale City Councillor Nancy Smith
  • Alum Rock Union Elementary School District Board Vice President Andres Quintero
  • Berryessa Union School District Board President Thelma Boac
  • Berryessa Union School District Board Vice President Hugo Jimenez
  • Campbell Union High School District Board Clerk and Trustee Stacey Brown
  • Campbell Union High School District Board member Kalen Gallagher
  • Cupertino Union School District Board member Liang-Fang Chao
  • Franklin-McKinley School District Board member Omar Torres
  • Former Franklin-McKinley School District Board member Maya Esparza
  • Los Altos School District Board member Bryan Johnson
  • Los Gatos Union School District Board member Daniel Snyder
  • Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District Board member Cynthia Chang
  • Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District Board Clerk and Trustee Katherine Tseng
  • Milpitas Unified School District Board President Daniel Bobay
  • Morgan Hill Unified School District Board member Gino Borgioli
  • Mountain View Whisman School District Board member Jose Gutierrez, Jr.
  • Orchard School District Board Clerk and Trustee Stephanie Hill
  • Palo Alto Unified School District Board member Todd Collins
  • Palo Alto Unified School District Board member Ken Dauber
  • Palo Alto Unified School District Board member Jennifer DiBrienza
  • Santa Clara Unified School District Board member Mark Richardson
  • Saratoga Union School District Board member Sophia Kao
  • Conejo Valley Unified School District Board member Betsy Connolly
  • Former Palo Alto Unified School District Board member Amado Padilla
  • Former Sacramento City Unified School District Board member Diana Rodriguez-Suruki
  • Former California State Board of Education member Allen Seid
  • Former state Sen. Jason Carter (D-GA)
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Chandra Brooks
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Shanta Franco-Clausen
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Suzanne E. Doty
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Jennifer Briscoe
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Teresa Fiss
  • Santa Clara County Commission on the Status of Women member Yan Zhou
  • Campbell Department of Parks and Recreation Chairwoman Celeste Walker
  • Los Altos Hills Planning Commissioner Kavita Tankha
  • Mountain View Parks and Recreation Commissioner Thida Cornes
  • Santa Monica Landmarks Commissioner Richard Brand
  • Santa Monica Commissioner Elena Christopoulos

Organizations and political activists

Community figures

  • XQ Superschool Project Chief Executive Officer Russlynn Ali
  • Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Marcella Alsan
  • University of California at San Francisco Medical School Professor Tamara Alliston
  • Y Combinator President Sam Altman
  • Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Ben Barres
  • Dartmouth College Professor Susan Brison
  • Carleton College Professor Anita Chikkatur
  • Lex Machina Chief Executive Officer Josh Becker
  • Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Richard Bland
  • Attorney Lisa Bloom
  • Film producer Nina Yang Bongiovi
  • U.S. House of Representatives candidate Bryan Caforio (D)
  • BlogHer co-founder Elisa Camahort
  • Thinkspace founder Peter Chee
  • Writer Adolpha Cole
  • Palo Alto community leader Gina Dalma
  • Film director Kirby Dick
  • Redpoint partner Satish Dharmaraj
  • Stanford University Professor Emerita Sandra Drake
  • Film producer Lena Dunham
  • Pixar photography director Danielle Feinberg
  • Comedian Nikki Glaser
  • Greylock investor Sarah Guo
  • U.S. House of Representatives candidate Josh Harder (D)
  • Peninsula Open Space Trust Board of Directors member Christy Holloway
  • Author John Hodgman
  • Greylock partner Reid Hoffman
  • Sense of Wonder co-founder Erin Hoffman-John
  • University of California at Berkeley Professor Victoria Kahn
  • Internet Law Center founder Bennett Kelley
  • Crowdpac founder Gisel Kordestani
  • Author Jon Krakauer
  • Television producer Stephanie Laing
  • LifeSite co-founder Crystal Lee
  • U.S. House of Representatives candidate Mike Levin (D)
  • Filmmaker Kamala Lopez
  • IVP general partner Jules Maltz
  • Musician Connie Lim
  • Elka Cholo Re host Paphia Nandy
  • Stanford University Professor David Palumbo-Liu
  • Wildlife Conservation Network Director Rebecca Patton
  • Clever Girls founder Stefania Pomponi
  • Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Marlene Rabinovitch
  • Writer Michaelene Risley
  • Writer Arnold Rudnick
  • Girls Who Code founder Reshma Saujani
  • Asian Americans for Community Involvement co-founder Mary Chan Seid
  • Filmmaker Jill Soloway
  • Vanderbilt University Professor Ronnie Steinberg
  • Actor Sharon Stone
  • Poet Amber Tamblyn
  • San Jose City Council candidate Omar Vasquez
  • State University of New York at Old Westbury Professor Judith Walsh
  • University of Southern California Professor Carol Wise
  • Parenting magazine founder Robin Wolaner
  • Women Donors Network member Wendy Wolf
  • Stanford University School of Medicine Professor Sophia Yen
  • Film producer Amy Ziering

Law professors

  • Harvard Law School Professor Howard E. Abrams
  • University of New Hampshire School of Law Professor Ann Bartow
  • Stanford Law School Professor G. Marcus Cole
  • Santa Clara University School of Law Professor Stephen F. Diamond
  • Stanford Law School Professor Michele Landis Dauber
  • Stanford Law School Professor Emeritus Ronald J. Gilson
  • Stanford Law School Professor William H. Neukom
  • University of Denver School of Law Professor Nancy Leong
  • Harvard Law School Professor Lawrence Lessig
  • Saint Louis University School of Law Professor Yvette Joy Liebesman
  • Yale Law School Professor Tracey L. Meares
  • Northwestern University Professor Laura Beth Nielsen
  • Rutgers Law School Professor Sarah E. Ricks
  • New York University Law School Professor Christopher Sprigman

Professor Michele Landis Dauber[edit]

Dauber was the leader of the recall campaign against Persky. She was a friend of the family of Turner's victim.[44]

Dauber told The Guardian that Persky's ruling made women at Stanford and across California less safe. "The judge bent over backwards in order to make an exception... and the message to women and students is 'you’re on your own,' and the message to potential perpetrators is, 'I’ve got your back,'" she said.[45]

Prameela Bartholomeusz[edit]

On May 2, Prameela Bartholomeusz, the co-chair of the committee to recall Persky, issued the following statement on the second-to-last judicial recall in California in 1913 and compared it to the Persky case:[46]

In 1913, businessman Albert Hendricks was caught trying to assault two 17-year-old girls, but he skipped town after San Francisco Judge Charles Weller reduced his bail from $3,000 to $1,000. Local women’s clubs led the effort to recall Judge Weller for “extending undue and unreasonable leniency to persons charged with the commission of heinous and vicious offenses.”

Weller’s was the first of only two successful judicial recalls in California’s history. Note that it did not lead to an onslaught of whimsical recalls, and it did not lead to substantial enough concerns about judicial independence for our constitutional right to recall judges to be revoked. It did, however, remove an elected official who had lost the faith of voters that he could fairly preside over sexual assault cases.

In that same vein, I will be voting to recall Judge Aaron Persky on June 5. I encourage my neighbors to do the same. [28]

Dolores Huerta[edit]

Dolores Huerta, the co-founder of United Farm Workers, was featured on a campaign mailer sent out by the recall campaign in May 2018.[47]

Ultraviolet[edit]

The women's advocacy group Ultraviolet submitted a petition to remove Persky to the California Commission on Judicial Performance on June 10.[48] The group also installed a digital billboard on the San Mateo Bridge that read "Protect Survivors, Not Rapists. Tell the California Commission on Judicial Performance that #PerskyMustGo."[49]

Palo Alto Weekly[edit]

The Palo Alto Weekly editorial board wrote the following in support of Persky's recall on May 11, 2018.[50]

Recall opponents[edit]

Persky's response[edit]

Persky filed his formal response to the recall on June 30, 2017. The response quotes former Judge LaDoris Cordell asking people not to sign the recall petition and notes that the judicial ethics commission investigated the Brock Turner sentence and found no bias. Below is an excerpt from Judge Persky's response:[51]

Judge Persky is a former prosecutor and advocate for battered women. As a judge, he has made thousands of decisions. It’s unfair to recall him over one controversial decision.


Judge Aaron Persky: 'As a prosecutor, I fought vigorously for victims. As a judge, my role is to consider both sides. California law requires every judge to consider rehabilitation and probation for first-time offenders. It’s not always popular, but it’s the law, and I took an oath to follow it without regard to public opinion or my opinions as a former prosecutor.'[28]

—Judge Aaron Persky[51]

May 8 press conference[edit]

Persky held a press conference on May 8 where he laid out his opposition to the recall. He said he had intended to remain silent about the recall but changed his mind after the pro-recall campaign began spreading what he called false claims about his record. He said judges should not have to think about public opinion when making decisions.

He also said the recall had negatively impacted his young children, who found negative flyers advocating his recall, and his wife, who he said was unsure which members of the community supported his recall and which did not.[52]

Interview with Palo Alto Daily Post[edit]

Persky and two of his supporters, retired Palo Alto Judge LaDoris Cordell and Santa Clara University law professor Ellen Kreitzberg, spoke with the Palo Alto Daily Post on May 2. Persky said the recall campaign threatened the "sanctuary" of the courtroom by bringing in public opinion. Cordell and Kreitzberg said this issue was more important than in 1932, the last time a California judge was recalled, because of the rise of social media and special interest groups.

“What we’re seeing in this election and in elections that are taking place in the last couple of years is, if you can put together some funding, you can engage in a campaign that can put out… completely false information,” Kreitzberg said. “It is out there in the universe and you can’t ever retrieve it. So I think it’s much more dangerous in these days about how quickly misinformation can spread, how pervasive it can become.”

Persky added: “The people who need an independent judge are everybody who walks into a courtroom. The last thing that a litigant wants to worry about when they enter that courtroom and see that person up there in the black robe, which suggests complete neutrality, … ‘Is this judge even a little bit worried about what people think about what he or she is about to do? What social media thinks? How is it going to play on Facebook? How is it going to play on Twitter?”[53]

Interview with Mercury News[edit]

Persky spoke to the editorial board of Mercury News on April 19, the first time he extensively discussed the recall. He said he supported efforts to change how sexual assault victims go through the criminal justice system, but that recalling him would not improve things.

He did not regret his sentencing of Turner, saying, " When the case came out and there’s the social media outrage, my personal opinion was that I can take the heat, I signed on to this job, I promised to essentially ignore public opinion.”

He also said that he was prevented from fully defending himself by ethics rules that prohibit him from discussing pending cases.

He worried about the implications of the recall, saying, “If the recall is successful, what does it mean for individual litigants? Is this judge going to be worried about what the Twitterverse thinks about what he or she does? The collateral damage here is to the individual future litigants and to public confidence in the judiciary.”[54]

Comments by Persky attorney Jim McManis[edit]

On May 25, 2018, Persky's attorney, Jim McManis, told Vogue magazine that the victim in the Turner case had not been attacked and mentioned that she had been drinking before the incident took place.

McManis also said he had a report that the statement from the victim was “written by a professional battered women’s advocate from the YWCA.” He said he had not verified the report.

In response, Michele Dauber that McManis was “rank victim blaming,” and that the claim that the victim did not write her statement was “untrue and completely inappropriate.”[55]

Members of Congress[edit]

U.S. Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D) and Anna Eshoo (D) released a joint statement in May 2018 where they endorsed Perky and argued that judges should not be influenced by political pressure.[47]

Santa Clara County Public Defender's Office[edit]

Several defense attorneys from the Santa Clara County Public Defender's Office, including head Molly O'Neal, have spoken in support of Persky. "The sentence was totally fair, not out of line, given his [Turner's] lack of a criminal record," O'Neal said. She denounced threats made against Persky and said it was wrong to recall a judge based on one ruling.[56] A group led by public defender Sajid A. Khan started a petition in support of Persky on Change.org.[57]

Group of Stanford law graduates[edit]

Fifty-three of the 180 students in Stanford Law School's graduating class sent an open letter to Dauber expressing their disagreement with her effort to recall Persky. Below is an excerpt from the letter:

We have deep reservations about the idea of a judge — any judge — being fired over sentencing decisions that the public perceives as too lenient.


As we’ve learned during our time at the law school, judicial independence is a cornerstone of due process and an essential prerequisite of a fair criminal justice system… After decades of mass incarceration driven by mandatory minimums and other punitive sentencing regimes, we believe that judicial leniency is already too scarce, even though we strongly disagree with how it was applied to Turner. And in a world where judges believe they are one unpopular sentencing decision away from an abrupt pink slip, it will only grow scarcer.[58][28]

Group of retired judges[edit]

Eighteen retired Santa Clara Superior Court judges signed a letter opposing the recall effort. The letter did not indicate whether the former judges considered the sentence appropriate, but it said removing Persky from his position based on this ruling would threaten judicial independence. Below is an excerpt from the letter:

We acknowledge and respect the deeply held views of those who disagree with Judge Persky’s sentencing decision in the Turner case. At the same time, the full record in the case shows that Judge Persky made his decision after considering all the evidence presented at trial, the statements of the victim and the defendant, and a detailed report from an experienced probation officer.[59][28]

Group of law professors[edit]

Forty-six law professors from California universities wrote a letter opposing the recall. They said that Persky had followed the advice of the probation report and that an independent review of his sentences did not reveal a pattern of bias. Below is an excerpt from the letter:

Rather than take on the difficult democratic work of seeking to change the law that confers sentencing discretion upon judges, or filing a complaint with the independent state agency charged with investigating and punishing judicial misconduct, the recall movement seeks to make Judge Persky and all other California judges fear the wrath of voters if they exercise their lawful discretion in favor of lenience.


This poses a serious threat to the rule of law. Naked political pressure of this kind risks undermining the very foundation of dispassionate, independent judgment upon which all criminal convictions and sentences depend for their legitimacy.[60][28]

San Francisco Chronicle[edit]

The editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle opposed the recall in an editorial opinion published on February 9, 2018.[61]

One of the most sacred principles of a system guided by rule of law is that the judiciary must be insulated from the dictates of authoritarian leaders or even the passions of the populace, no matter how intense or justified. Judges must retain the independence to follow the law without fear of losing their jobs...

Again, we would not propose to defend a six-month sentence for a young man convicted of sexual assault on an intoxicated and unconscious woman behind a dumpster on campus. We, too, were moved by the account of the 23-year-old victim, known in court records as “Emily Doe,” who told Turner at sentencing: “You took away my worth, my privacy, my energy, my time, my intimacy, my confidence, my own voice, until today.”

The furor over the verdict led California legislators to move quickly to toughen the sentencing laws on sex crimes, including an expansion of the definition of rape to include all forms of non-consensual assault, not just “an act of sexual intercourse.” Gov. Jerry Brown signed those bills in September 2016.

This is the way the system should work. Don’t blame judges for following their discretion within the law. This recall effort is ill-advised and dangerous. Neither justice for defendants nor the concept of judicial independence is served if judges are guided by their anticipation of public reaction instead of the letter of the law.[28]

Palo Alto Daily Post[edit]

After initially calling for Persky's removal from the office on June 6, 2016, over the Turner decision, the Palo Alto Daily Post came out against the recall on May 10, 2018.[62][63]

Debates[edit]

Several debates were held for supporters and opponents of the recall to argue their respective points of view. Summaries of debates are included in this section. It is not comprehensive.

April 25 debate[edit]

Stanford Law Professor Mark Lemley, a recall supporter, and Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley’s law school and a recall opponent, debated the recall at Stanford's law school.[44][64]

Arguments made by Lemley

  • Persky has made at least five decisions in favor of male athletes alleged to have committed acts of violence against women. “Persky has repeatedly favored privileged men, especially college athletes, over women of color,” he said. He said the bias could be due to Persky's background as a lacrosse player at Stanford.
  • Only 64 Persky cases involved violence against women, making the five instances of bias more notable than if viewing all 2,000 Persky cases.
  • Recalls are very rare and they are not likely to increase if the one against Persky is successful.
  • Judges' behavior will not be affected by the recall because they will know that it was prompted by Persky's pattern of decision-making rather than just one decision.

Arguments made by Chemerinsky

  • In the cases where Persky was alleged to show bias toward athletes accused of crimes against women, he always followed the probation department's recommendation.
  • Citing five out of 2,000 Persky cases is not enough to prove systemic bias.
  • Changing the laws governing sentencing is preferable to recalling judges.
  • Judges should not be punished for following the recommendation of the district attorney and the probation department. If a district attorney thinks the sentence was lenient, they can appeal it.
  • Recalling Persky will send a message to judges that they need to impose harsher sentences. This will primarily lead to harsher sentences for black and Latino men.

April 20 debate[edit]

Recall leader and Stanford Law professor Michele Dauber debated Santa Clara University law professor Ellen Kreitzberg, a recall opponent, at Hayes Street Grill in San Francisco.[65]

Arguments made by Kreitzberg

  • Judges swear an oath to disregard public opinion when making decisions. This recall is already causing judges to give out harsher sentences than they would have previously.
  • Judges who engage in unethical conduct should be dealt with by the state’s Commission on Judicial Performance (which cleared Persky), not the recall process.

Responses by Dauber

  • Those who think judges will be intimidated by the recall have “a dim view of judicial intelligence and judicial integrity.”
  • The Commission on Judicial Performance's review of the Persky case was biased and only addressed one side of the issue.

April 18 debate[edit]

Recall leader and Stanford Law professor Michele Dauber was set to debate Palo Alto Judge LaDoris Cordell, a recall opponent, at an event hosted by the South Peninsula Area Republican Coalition. Dauber did not attend and sent Stanford professor G. Marcus Cole in her place.[66]

Arguments made by Cordell

  • Attempts to show that Persky had a history of giving lenient sentences was limited. He said, “In their desperate attempt to paint a picture of Judge Persky as a biased judge and overall bad person, and after combing through thousands of records, the recall campaign came up with five cases. Think about it, five cases out of 2,000. That’s 0.25%, or one-quarter of 1%, of Judge Persky’s cases. Common sense tells you that’s not a pattern.”
  • The Turner case was the first time Persky was accused of bias. He is married to a woman of color and has two biracial children. He previously received awards for his pro bono work and addressed hate crimes, sex crimes, and domestic violence as a prosecutor.
  • If proponents want to remove Persky, they could run against him in his next election. A recall is inappropriate and intended to address misconduct, not controversial decisions.

Arguments made by Cole

  • Superior court judges are more powerful than lifetime appointed judges due to their six-year terms and, because of this, judicial independence and judicial accountability should be balanced. He said, “This is why California law and the California Constitution, as well as 26 other states, balance judicial independence with judicial accountability. The sweeping powers of state court judges requires that they be exercised with the public trust. That trust was breached by Judge Persky in the Brock Turner case.”
  • During the 18 months Persky heard cases at the Palo Alto courthouse, he gave lenient sentences to persons convicted of child pornography and domestic violence charges. He also allowed jury members in a rape case to see revealing pictures of the victim, suggesting that the victim invited the assault.
  • Public outrage against Persky is high enough to justify the recall. His presence in the office might discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward.

Path to the ballot[edit]

See also: Laws governing recall in California

According to Section 14 of Article II of the California Constitution, petitioners must submit signatures equal to 20 percent of the votes cast for a judge in the last election to qualify a judicial recall for the ballot. For county superior court judges who did not appear on the ballot in the last election, such as Persky, the requirement is signatures equal to 20 percent of the votes cast for the countywide office that received the least number of votes in the last election. Recall supporters had to collect 58,634 valid signatures in a 160-day period to get the Persky recall on the ballot.

On June 26, 2017, recall proponents filed a notice of intent to recall Persky.[67] The recall was authorized for signature gathering by the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters on August 9, 2017.[68]

Two days later, retired Superior Court Judge Marjorie Laird Carter approved Persky's request for a temporary restraining order against the recall. Persky argued that the recall should have gone through the state secretary of state rather than the county office because he was a state official. Carter scheduled a hearing for August 23, 2017, and recall proponents were barred from collecting signatures in the meantime. If the judge had ruled in favor of Persky's argument, the recall application would have had to be refiled with the secretary of state.[69]

The recall campaign moved to disqualify Carter from the case. "Unfortunately, the fact that Judge Carter would issue a prior restraint of protected First Amendment speech without any finding of a compelling government interest, and indeed without even letting us discuss the question, demonstrates that she does not have a sufficient appreciation for or does not fully understand the important First Amendment issues at stake in this case," Dauber said in requesting Carter's disqualification.[70]

Retired Judge Kay Tsenin took over the case, and the hearing was postponed until August 28, 2017. Tsenin ruled in favor of the recall campaign, lifting the restraining order.[71] Persky appealed, but the California Sixth District Court of Appeal rejected his request to end the recall process.[72]

On January 11, 2018, the recall campaign submitted signatures to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters. They reported collecting 95,000 signatures.[73] The county registrar of voters announced on January 23, 2018, that it had verified a sufficient number of signatures to place the recall on the June 5 ballot.[35] On February 6, 2018, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors officially approved the recall election for the ballot.[12]

State overview[edit]

Partisan control[edit]

This section details the partisan control of federal and state positions in California heading into the 2018 elections.

Congressional delegation[edit]

State executives[edit]

  • As of May 2018, Democrats held seven of 10 state executive positions and the remaining three positions were officially nonpartisan.
  • The governor of California was Democrat Jerry Brown.

State legislature[edit]

  • Democrats controlled both chambers of the California State Legislature. They had a 55-25 majority in the state Assembly and a 27-13 majority in the state Senate.

Trifecta status[edit]

  • California was a state government trifecta, meaning that Democrats held the governorship and majorities in the state house and state senate.

2018 elections[edit]

See also: California elections, 2018

California held elections for the following positions in 2018:

Demographics[edit]

Demographic data for California
 CaliforniaU.S.
Total population:38,993,940316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):155,7793,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:61.8%73.6%
Black/African American:5.9%12.6%
Asian:13.7%5.1%
Native American:0.7%0.8%
Pacific Islander:0.4%0.2%
Two or more:4.5%3%
Hispanic/Latino:38.4%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:81.8%86.7%
College graduation rate:31.4%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$61,818$53,889
Persons below poverty level:18.2%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in California.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

As of July 2016, California had a population of approximately 39,000,000 people, with its three largest cities being Los Angeles (pop. est. 4.0 million), San Diego (pop. est. 1.4 million), and San Jose (pop. est. 1 million).[74][75]

State election history[edit]

This section provides an overview of federal and state elections in California from 2000 to 2016. All data comes from the California Secretary of State.

Historical elections[edit]

Presidential elections, 2000-2016[edit]

This chart shows the results of the presidential election in California every year from 2000 to 2016.

Election results (President of the United States), California 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2016 Democratic Party Hillary Clinton 61.7% Republican Party Donald Trump 31.6% 30.1%
2012 Democratic Party Barack Obama 60.2% Republican Party Mitt Romney 37.1% 23.1%
2008 Democratic Party Barack Obama 61.1% Republican Party John McCain 37% 24.1%
2004 Democratic Party John Kerry 54.4% Republican Party George W. Bush 44.4% 10%
2000 Democratic Party Al Gore 53.5% Republican Party George W. Bush 41.7% 11.8%

U.S. Senate elections, 2000-2016[edit]

This chart shows the results of U.S. Senate races in California from 2000 to 2016. Every state has two Senate seats, and each seat goes up for election every six years. The terms of the seats are staggered so that roughly one-third of the seats are up every two years.

Election results (U.S. Senator), California 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2016 Democratic Party Kamala Harris 61.6% Democratic Party Loretta Sanchez 38.4% 23.2%
2012 Democratic Party Dianne Feinstein 62.5% Republican Party Elizabeth Emken 37.5% 25%
2010 Democratic Party Barbara Boxer 52.2% Republican Party Carly Fiorina 42.2% 10%
2006 Democratic Party Dianne Feinstein 59.5% Republican Party Richard Mountjoy 35.1% 24.4%
2004 Democratic Party Barbara Boxer 57.8% Republican Party Bill Jones 37.8% 20%
2000 Democratic Party Dianne Feinstein 55.9% Republican Party Tom Campbell 36.6% 19.3%

Gubernatorial elections, 2000-2016[edit]

This chart shows the results of the four gubernatorial elections held between 2000 and 2016. Gubernatorial elections are held every four years in California.

Election results (Governor), California 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2014 Democratic Party Jerry Brown 60% Republican Party Neel Kashkari 40% 20%
2010 Democratic Party Jerry Brown 53.8% Republican Party Meg Whitman 40.9% 12.9%
2006 Republican Party Arnold Schwarzenegger 55.9% Democratic Party Phil Angelides 39.0% 16.9%
2002 Democratic Party Gray Davis 47.3% Republican Party Bill Simon 42.4% 4.9%

Congressional delegation, 2000-2016[edit]

This chart shows the number of Democrats and Republicans who were elected to represent California in the U.S. House from 2000 to 2016. Elections for U.S. House seats are held every two years.

Congressional delegation, California 2000-2016
Year Democrats Democrats (%) Republicans Republicans (%) Balance of power
2016 Democratic Party 39 73.5% Republican Party 14 26.4% D+25
2014 Democratic Party 39 73.5% Republican Party 14 26.4% D+25
2012 Democratic Party 38 71.7% Republican Party 15 28.3% D+23
2010 Democratic Party 34 64.1% Republican Party 19 35.8% D+15
2008 Democratic Party 34 64.1% Republican Party 19 35.8% D+15
2006 Democratic Party 34 64.1% Republican Party 19 35.8% D+15
2004 Democratic Party 33 62.3% Republican Party 20 37.7% D+13
2002 Democratic Party 33 62.3% Republican Party 20 37.7% D+13
2000 Democratic Party 32 61.5% Republican Party 20 38.5% D+12

Trifectas, 1992-2017[edit]

A state government trifecta occurs when one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's office.

California Party Control: 1992-2024
Nineteen years of Democratic trifectas  •  No Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.

Year 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Governor R R R R R R R D D D D D R R R R R R R D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
Senate D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
Assembly D D D S R D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D


See also[edit]

External links[edit]

Additional reading[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ABC News, "Judge in Brock Turner assault case to face vote for removal in June," January 24, 2018
  2. California Constitution, "Final steps in the recall: Ballots," accessed February 12, 2018
  3. California Constitution, "Final steps in the recall: Recall elections," accessed February 12, 2018
  4. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner case: Judge launches fight against recall," August 29, 2016
  5. The Recall Elections Blog, "California: Petitioners hand in 95,000 signatures against Santa Clara Judge Aaron Persky; Likely to be first recall of a judge since 1982," January 11, 2018
  6. 6.0 6.1 California Secretary of State, "Election dates and resources," accessed January 31, 2018
  7. Ballotpedia staff, "Phone call with the California Secretary of State's Office," January 31, 2018
  8. 8.0 8.1 Mercury News, "California’s top court deals fatal blow to Brock Turner judge’s bid to stop recall," May 1, 2018
  9. 9.0 9.1 The Stanford Daily, "Following appeal denial, Persky recall measure remains on June ballot," March 26, 2018
  10. 10.0 10.1 Mountain View Voice, "Appellate court justices to decide if Persky recall stays on June 5 ballot," March 20, 2018
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 The Mercury News, "Persky recall opponent joins race to replace embattled judge," February 8, 2018
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 CBS News, "Santa Clara County supes vote to add Persky recall to June ballot," February 6, 2018
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Mountain View Voice, "Persky opponent launches fundraising campaign," October 21, 2017
  14. Santa Clara County Elections, "Contest/candidate proof list," accessed March 5, 2018
  15. 15.0 15.1 Newsweek, "REMEMBER THE JUDGE IN THE BROCK TURNER CASE? HE COULD BE REMOVED WITH THE HELP OF THESE WOMEN," October 17, 2017
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Palo Alto Weekly, "Candidates for Persky's seat steer clear of Turner case," May 11, 2018
  17. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Two lawyers vie to replace Judge Persky," April 22, 2018
  18. Mercury News, "Storey is Best Replacement if Persky is Recalled," May 22, 2018
  19. 19.0 19.1 Palo Alto Online, "San Jose lawyer enters recall race," February 16, 2018
  20. The Guardian, "Ex-Stanford swimmer gets six months in jail and probation for sexual assault," June 2, 2016
  21. 21.0 21.1 The Mercury News, "Stanford sex assault: Will Brock Turner get years in prison for attack on unconscious woman?" June 1, 2016
  22. The Washington Post, "Stanford sex offender Brock Turner is appealing his conviction," December 2, 2017
  23. BuzzFeed News, "Here is the powerful letter the Stanford victim read aloud to her attacker," June 3, 2016
  24. Independent, "Stanford rape case: Read the impact statement of Brock Turner's victim," September 2, 2016
  25. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner case: Campaign turns in nearly 95,000 signatures to put judge's recall on June ballot," January 11, 2018
  26. Santa Clara County Elections, "2016 Candidate List," accessed June 14, 2016
  27. Palo Alto Weekly, "Analysis of Judge Persky's 'pattern' cases," May 11, 2018
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  29. The Mercury News, "Timeline of significant dates in the life of Brock Turner," June 11, 2016
  30. The Guardian, "Judge in Stanford sexual assault case faces recall effort over light sentence," June 6, 2016
  31. Los Angeles Times, "California political heavyweights join effort to oust Stanford rape case judge," June 10, 2016
  32. Palo Alto Online, "Following Turner's release, recall-campaign organizers rally," September 2, 2016
  33. New York Times, "Judge in Stanford sexual assault case is cleared of misconduct," December 19, 2016
  34. CBS News, "Committee to Recall Judge Persky submits signatures for ballot," January 11, 2018
  35. 35.0 35.1 Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, "Judge Aaron Persky recall petition qualifies for ballot," January 23, 2018
  36. The Spokesman-Review, "Stanford professor in recall effort receives rape threat," February 14, 2018
  37. The Mercury News, "White powder mailer targeted Persky recall leader, Trump Jr., authorities say," March 1, 2018
  38. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner sexual assault case: Judge Persky’s possible recall postponed," March 15, 2017
  39. 39.0 39.1 CBS SF Bay Area, "Poll Shows Effort To Recall Judge Persky Could Be Waning," May 22, 2018
  40. Mercury News, "Judge Persky: Effort to recall judge in Stanford sexual assault leads by double digits, poll finds," May 17, 2018
  41. Mountain View Voice, "Survey of voters reveals support for recall of Brock Turner judge," June 28, 2016
  42. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Recall Persky campaign raises more than $1 million," May 27, 2018
  43. '"Recall Judge Aaron Persky, "Endorsers and Supporters," accessed March 22, 2018
  44. 44.0 44.1 Stanford Daily, "Law School hosts debate on Persky Recall," April 25, 2018
  45. TIME, "Judge who gave Stanford sex offender a lenient sentence faces recall campaign," June 6, 2016
  46. Mercury News, "Letter: Judge recalls do not threaten judicial independence," May 2, 2018
  47. 47.0 47.1 Mercury News, "Judge Aaron Persky: Dolores Huerta, women’s right to choose invoked in recall battle," May 23, 2018
  48. U.S. News & World Report, "The Latest: Activists file petitions in judge recall effort," June 10, 2016
  49. WAFB, "Group calls for recall of Stanford rape case judge," June 22, 2016
  50. Palo Alto Weekly, "Editorial: Recall Judge Persky," May 11, 2018
  51. 51.0 51.1 The Mercury News, "Judge Persky speaks out in anti-recall statement filed with registrar," June 30, 2017
  52. ABC 7 News, "Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky breaks silence amid recall effort," May 8, 2018
  53. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Judge facing recall speaks out for judicial independence," May 3, 2018
  54. Mercury News, "Judge Aaron Persky breaks silence, speaks out against recall effort as campaign hits stretch run," April 19, 2018
  55. Vogue, "Rape Culture Is on the Ballot ​i​n California," May 23, 2018
  56. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner case: Q&A on sexual assault sentence, possible appeal and more," June 8, 2016
  57. NBC Bay Area, "Bay area legal professionals oppose efforts to recall Judge Aaron Persky," June 21, 2016
  58. The College Fix, "Stanford law grads rebuke professor leading recall against Brock Turner judge," June 23, 2016
  59. KRON 4, "Letter by retired judges addresses efforts to remove judge Aaron Persky for sentence on ex-Stanford swimmer Brock Turner," July 6, 2016
  60. East Bay Times, "Brock Turner: Leading law school professors issue letter opposing judge's recall," July 28, 2016
  61. San Francisco Chronicle, "Editorial: The case against the recall of Judge Persky," February 9, 2018
  62. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Judge Aaron Persky should be fired," June 6, 2016
  63. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Editorial: Vote ‘no’ on recall of Judge Persky," May 10, 2018
  64. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Other judges are watching the Persky recall campaign, law school dean says," April 26, 2018
  65. SFGate, "Foes, backers of Judge Persky recall effort face off in debate," April 20, 2018
  66. Palo Alto Daily Post, "Dauber pulls out of recall debate, sends law school colleague to go up against Cordell," April 19, 2018
  67. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner sex assault case: Recall backers take 1st step toward ousting judge," June 26, 2017
  68. The Recorder, "Court ices Persky recall effort," August 11, 2017
  69. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner case: Judge orders Persky recall campaign to stop collecting signatures for at least 12 days," August 11, 2017
  70. The Mercury News, "Persky recall campaign dumps judge who blocked petition drive," August 21, 2017
  71. The Mercury News, "Retired judge agrees to handle legal battle over Persky recall," August 22, 2017
  72. The Mercury News, "Appeals court denies Judge Persky’s request to stop recall petition drive," December 2, 2017
  73. The Mercury News, "Brock Turner case: Campaign turns in nearly 95,000 signatures to put judge’s recall on June ballot," January 11, 2018
  74. California Demographics, "California Cities by Population," accessed April 2, 2018
  75. U.S. Census Bureau, "Quickfacts California," accessed April 2, 2018

Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Original source: https://ballotpedia.org/Aaron_Persky_recall,_Santa_Clara_County,_California_(2018)
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF