A "yes" vote would have upheld AB 1309, which was designed to limit certain third-party claimant lawsuits.

A "no" vote would have repealed AB 1309, which was designed to limit certain third-party claimant lawsuits.

No

Insurance Claims Practices. Civil Remedy Amendments. Referendum.

• Limit conditions under which injured party may sue another person's insurer for damages resulting from insurer's unfair claims settlement practices;

• Limit emotional distress claims;

• Limit property damage claims to those caused by motor vehicle incident;

• Exempt professional liability insurers from unfair claims settlement practices suit if professional's consent is required for settlement and professional withholds consent;

• Provide that an insurer requesting arbitration is presumed to act in good faith;

• Add requirement that state auditor report on effect of Proposition 30, as amended.

• If the voters approve Proposition 30, this proposition would slightly reduce the fiscal impact that Proposition 30 would have on state revenues and have an unknown impact on state court costs.
• If the voters disapprove Proposition 30, this measure would have no fiscal impact on state and local governments.

^[1]