Dallas Independent School District, Texas

This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates.

Office	Name	Date assumed office
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 1	Edwin Flores	2015
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 2	Dustin Marshall	2016
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 3	Dan Micciche	2012
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 4	Karla Garcia	June 27, 2019
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 5	Maxie Johnson	2019
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 6	Joyce Foreman	2014
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 7	Ben Mackey	2019
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 8	Joe Carreon	November 19, 2020
Dallas Independent School District Board of Trustees District 9	Justin Henry	2018

This officeholder information was last updated on October 11, 2021. Please contact us with any updates.

Revenue by Source
Fiscal Year	Local		State		Federal		Revenue Total
	Total	% of Revenue	Total	% of Revenue	Total	% of Revenue

Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years.
1993	$566,437,000	71.18%	$158,327,000	19.90%	$70,984,000	8.92%	$795,748,000
1994	$518,119,000	69.04%	$159,426,000	21.24%	$72,886,000	9.71%	$750,431,000
1995	$524,390,000	67.46%	$178,314,000	22.94%	$74,611,000	9.60%	$777,315,000
1996	$580,070,000	67.68%	$188,915,000	22.04%	$88,067,000	10.28%	$857,052,000
1997	$585,814,000	67.15%	$197,979,000	22.69%	$88,667,000	10.16%	$872,460,000
1998	$632,629,000	67.30%	$211,537,000	22.50%	$95,848,000	10.20%	$940,014,000
1999	$670,659,000	68.68%	$202,760,000	20.77%	$103,019,000	10.55%	$976,438,000
2000	$724,925,000	68.13%	$233,001,000	21.90%	$106,033,000	9.97%	$1,063,959,000
2001	$827,165,000	71.33%	$215,769,000	18.61%	$116,635,000	10.06%	$1,159,569,000
2002	$872,436,000	72.62%	$196,165,000	16.33%	$132,769,000	11.05%	$1,201,370,000
2003	$927,652,000	68.24%	$266,060,000	19.57%	$165,779,000	12.19%	$1,359,491,000
2004	$953,405,000	70.92%	$205,810,000	15.31%	$185,142,000	13.77%	$1,344,357,000
2005	$1,037,437,000	72.43%	$209,650,000	14.64%	$185,237,000	12.93%	$1,432,324,000
2006	$1,120,696,000	71.98%	$226,097,000	14.52%	$210,079,000	13.49%	$1,556,872,000
2007	$1,061,420,000	66.86%	$312,635,000	19.69%	$213,494,000	13.45%	$1,587,549,000
2008	$922,764,000	57.21%	$473,768,000	29.37%	$216,482,000	13.42%	$1,613,014,000
2009	$945,399,000	58.52%	$440,876,000	27.29%	$229,315,000	14.19%	$1,615,590,000

2010	$1,010,412,000	57.14%	$420,867,000	23.80%	$336,955,000	19.06%	$1,768,234,000
2011	$934,377,000	53.79%	$448,983,000	25.85%	$353,634,000	20.36%	$1,736,994,000
2012	$959,928,000	57.21%	$466,566,000	27.81%	$251,377,000	14.98%	$1,677,871,000
2013	$977,957,000	59.92%	$398,911,000	24.44%	$255,315,000	15.64%	$1,632,183,000
Avg.	$826,385,286	65.94%	$276,781,714	21.49%	$169,158,476	12.57%	$1,272,325,476

Expenditures[edit]

The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:

• Instruction: operation expenditures, state payments on behalf of the district for instruction and benefits, and retirement system transfers
• Support Services: support services, food services, and retirement system transfers for support service staff
• Capital Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
• Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on school system debt
• Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services

Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years.
1993	$365,854,000	55.22%	$247,732,000	37.39%	$26,343,000	3.98%	$16,092,000	2.43%	$6,537,000	0.99%	$662,558,000
1994	$412,715,000	53.89%	$291,600,000	38.08%	$39,853,000	5.20%	$16,448,000	2.15%	$5,161,000	0.67%	$765,777,000
1995	$441,168,000	52.65%	$303,278,000	36.20%	$66,468,000	7.93%	$17,512,000	2.09%	$9,442,000	1.13%	$837,868,000
1996	$447,427,000	47.19%	$318,506,000	33.59%	$144,971,000	15.29%	$25,648,000	2.71%	$11,558,000	1.22%	$948,110,000
1997	$484,936,000	49.71%	$309,708,000	31.75%	$137,644,000	14.11%	$29,834,000	3.06%	$13,480,000	1.38%	$975,602,000
1998	$502,762,000	54.46%	$333,021,000	36.07%	$50,508,000	5.47%	$22,618,000	2.45%	$14,282,000	1.55%	$923,191,000
1999	$512,171,000	54.22%	$354,189,000	37.49%	$39,055,000	4.13%	$22,567,000	2.39%	$16,675,000	1.77%	$944,657,000
2000	$575,903,000	56.54%	$377,793,000	37.09%	$27,773,000	2.73%	$20,969,000	2.06%	$16,195,000	1.59%	$1,018,633,000
2001	$647,152,000	57.34%	$413,381,000	36.63%	$27,507,000	2.44%	$20,084,000	1.78%	$20,529,000	1.82%	$1,128,653,000
2002	$659,143,000	55.40%	$428,266,000	36.00%	$58,730,000	4.94%	$18,630,000	1.57%	$24,935,000	2.10%	$1,189,704,000
2003	$760,360,000	56.35%	$452,929,000	33.57%	$73,986,000	5.48%	$36,643,000	2.72%	$25,383,000	1.88%	$1,349,301,000
2004	$730,295,000	49.21%	$467,639,000	31.51%	$222,934,000	15.02%	$33,429,000	2.25%	$29,645,000	2.00%	$1,483,942,000
2005	$739,599,000	40.33%	$474,901,000	25.90%	$536,148,000	29.24%	$49,844,000	2.72%	$33,212,000	1.81%	$1,833,704,000
2006	$767,180,000	41.96%	$492,657,000	26.95%	$472,624,000	25.85%	$62,872,000	3.44%	$32,841,000	1.80%	$1,828,174,000
2007	$802,339,000	48.44%	$535,655,000	32.34%	$215,993,000	13.04%	$72,978,000	4.41%	$29,422,000	1.78%	$1,656,387,000
2008	$900,426,000	53.10%	$555,649,000	32.77%	$137,918,000	8.13%	$72,345,000	4.27%	$29,379,000	1.73%	$1,695,717,000
2009	$888,360,000	54.87%	$562,005,000	34.71%	$55,975,000	3.46%	$88,911,000	5.49%	$23,881,000	1.47%	$1,619,132,000

2010	$864,098,000	51.10%	$560,116,000	33.12%	$153,232,000	9.06%	$93,871,000	5.55%	$19,719,000	1.17%	$1,691,036,000
2011	$880,849,000	43.16%	$620,404,000	30.40%	$437,620,000	21.44%	$84,744,000	4.15%	$17,471,000	0.86%	$2,041,088,000
2012	$792,087,000	41.68%	$556,348,000	29.27%	$386,544,000	20.34%	$152,173,000	8.01%	$13,349,000	0.70%	$1,900,501,000
2013	$767,652,000	43.50%	$555,769,000	31.49%	$293,336,000	16.62%	$131,349,000	7.44%	$16,648,000	0.94%	$1,764,754,000
Avg.	$663,927,429	50.49%	$438,645,048	33.44%	$171,674,381	11.14%	$51,883,857	3.48%	$19,511,619	1.44%	$1,345,642,333

Debt

The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.

Debt
Fiscal Year	Retired	Issued	Outstanding

Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years.
1993	$130,037,000	$250,571,000	$289,625,000
1994	$15,060,000	$13,049,000	$288,772,000
1995	$16,844,000	$17,468,000	$288,820,000
1996	$65,160,000	$210,220,000	$442,901,000
1997	$10,185,000	$10,000,000	$413,354,000
1998	$21,550,000	$0	$391,804,000
1999	$185,585,000	$165,460,000	$399,278,000
2000	$22,035,000	$0	$382,078,000
2001	$26,715,000	$0	$357,855,000
2002	$63,245,000	$372,774,000	$662,729,000
2003	$126,699,000	$157,785,000	$720,047,000
2004	$47,050,000	$300,000,000	$979,544,000
2005	$91,230,000	$444,135,000	$1,327,128,000
2006	$49,010,000	$290,205,000	$1,577,636,000
2007	$40,449,000	$0	$1,472,110,000
2008	$49,340,000	$0	$1,467,688,000
2009	$153,125,000	$514,085,000	$1,855,708,000

2010	$232,730,000	$156,730,000	$1,769,899,000
2011	$108,710,000	$1,020,380,000	$2,675,516,000
2012	$262,350,000	$197,935,000	$2,612,798,000
2013	$521,275,000	$437,060,000	$2,537,141,000
Avg.	$106,589,714	$217,040,810	$1,091,068,143

Teacher salaries[edit]

The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.

Year	Minimum	Maximum
2021[5]	$47,000	$114,973

Academic performance[edit]

Proficiency assessments[edit]

Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.^[6]

Mathematics[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:^[7]

School year	All (%)	Asian/Pacific Islander (%)	Black (%)	Hispanic (%)	Native American (%)	Two or More Races (%)	White (%)
2018-2019	47	65	34	49	40-44	54	69
2017-2018	44	56	30	46	40-44	50	66
2016-2017	71	75	60	73	70-74	75	83
2015-2016	66	71	54	69	65-69	76	83
2014-2015	62	66	48	65	65-69	69	81
2013-2014	65	69	54	68	65-69	69	83
2012-2013	68	75	59	70	70	76	84
2011-2012	74	71	64	77	75-79	82	87
2010-2011	77	65	68	79	76	N/A	85

Reading/language arts[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:^[7]

School year	All (%)	Asian/Pacific Islander (%)	Black (%)	Hispanic (%)	Native American (%)	Two or More Races (%)	White (%)
2018-2019	40	51	30	41	40-44	50	68
2017-2018	37	47	28	38	40-44	51	67
2016-2017	62	63	52	64	60-64	77	82
2015-2016	61	58	53	62	60-64	79	83
2014-2015	63	56	55	64	60-64	76	83
2013-2014	64	60	57	66	60-64	76	85
2012-2013	70	66	66	70	74	80	88
2011-2012	82	69	78	83	85-89	88	92
2010-2011	82	67	79	83	85	N/A	91

Graduation rates[edit]

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:^[7][8]

School year	All (%)	Asian/Pacific Islander (%)	Black (%)	Hispanic (%)	Native American (%)	Two or More Races (%)	White (%)
2017-2018	87	80-84	85	87	≥80	80-89	90
2016-2017	88	85-89	86	88	≥80	80-89	90
2015-2016	87	80-84	87	87	80-89	80-89	91
2014-2015	87	85-89	85	87	80-89	80-89	92
2013-2014	86	75-79	83	87	80-89	80-89	86
2012-2013	85	70-74	81	86	90-94	70-79	88
2011-2012	81	80-84	79	83	85-89	60-69	83
2010-2011	77	75-79	75	78	75-79	70-79	83

Student enrollment[edit]

Year[9]	Enrollment	Year-to-year change (%)
2018-2019	155,119	-1.1
2017-2018	156,832	-0.7
2016-2017	157,866	-0.5
2015-2016	158,586	-1.0
2014-2015	160,246	0.3
2013-2014	159,704	0.5
2012-2013	158,919	1.0
2011-2012	157,420	0.2
2010-2011	157,143	0.0
2009-2010	157,092	-0.2
2008-2009	157,332	-0.2
2007-2008	157,605	-0.8
2006-2007	158,814	-1.3
2005-2006	160,969	1.9
2004-2005	157,953	-1.5
2003-2004	160,400	-1.6
2002-2003	163,079	-0.3
2001-2002	163,562	1.2
2000-2001	161,548	0.7
1999-2000	160,477	0.4
1998-1999	159,908	1.5
1997-1998	157,622	1.8
1996-1997	154,847	4.0
1995-1996	148,839	2.6
1994-1995	145,019	1.7
1993-1994	142,652	2.1
1992-1993	139,711	1.5
1991-1992	137,686	1.7
1990-1991	135,320	2.3
1989-1990	132,256	1.0
1988-1989	130,904	0.0
1987-1988	130,885	-1.1
1986-1987	132,389	-

About the district[edit]

Dallas Independent School District is located in Dallas County, Texas. It is classified as a large city school district by the National Center for Education Statistics. The district served 155,119 students during the 2018-2019 school year and comprised 240 schools.^[10]

During the 2018-2019 school year, 86.2% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 40.7% were English language learners, and 8.9% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP)An IEP is a specific education plan that is tailored to the needs of a student with a disability. It describes how the student learns most effectively, formulates goals for the student and considers their ability in relation to general curriculum..^[11]

Racial Demographics, 2018-2019
Race	Dallas Independent School District (%)	Texas K-12 students (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native	0.5	0.4
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander	1.3	4.5
Black	22.0	12.6
Hispanic	69.6	52.5
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	0.1	0.2
Two or More Races	0.8	2.4
White	5.7	27.4

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Noteworthy events[edit]

2017: District designates schools as 'welcoming and protective' to all students[edit]

See also: Sanctuary policy preemption conflicts between the federal and local governments

Sanctuary policy conflicts

Dallas Independent School District was one of 15 districts tracked by Ballotpedia that debated sanctuary policies as of October 16, 2017. Learn more about these debates on Ballopedia's coverage of sanctuary jurisdictions »

The Dallas Independent board of trustees unanimously approved a resolution on February 23, 2017, that designated the district campus as "Welcoming and Protective of all its students and their families to the fullest extent of the law." The resolution also directed the superintendent to ensure students are aware of post-high school opportunities, such as scholarships and internships, regardless of their immigration status.^[12]

The approval of the resolution followed two days of student protests in response to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issuing guidance memos on the enforcement of immigration laws and President Donald Trump's executive orders on immigration. The memos called for more Border Patrol agents and prioritized the removal of individuals convicted or charged with a crime and reinforced prosecutorial discretion.^[13][14]

A total of 23,000 district students were also absent on February 16, 2017, due to the Day Without Immigrants protest. Though officials from DHS said that the guidance memos would not impact the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which protects minors brought to the U.S. without legal permission, teachers and students spoke about students' fears of deportation at the school board meeting on February 23, 2017.^[13][15]

Unlike other districts across the country, the resolution did not label the Dallas ISD a sanctuary district or safe zone.^[13] It also said that the resolution should not "be construed to require an employee or agent of Dallas Independent School District to take any action in violation of federal or state law."^[12]

2016: Choice schools[edit]

Four new "choice schools" in Dallas ISD began accepting applications in January 2016.^[16] According to the Dallas Observer, choice schools "operate a bit like DISD’s highly regarded magnets, in that they have specialized programs that draw students from throughout the district, but they lack the academic- and performance-based admissions requirements that keep most families out of the district’s top campuses."^[17]

According to supporters, these schools brought a new aspect of school choice into the picture because, unlike vouchers or charter schools, they aimed to keep students within public schools by providing more options for parents.^[17] The district stated it would provide transportation for attending students and that it intended to open 35 choice schools by 2020.^[16]

2015: Superintendent Mike Miles resigns[edit]

Mike Miles announced his resignation on June 23, 2015. Miles stated the move was due to family matters.^[18]

The board unanimously voted to hire Michael Hinojosa as interim superintendent after Miles resigned. Hinojosa previously served the district as superintendent from 2005 to 2011. At the time, he left to serve a school district in Georgia. In September 2015, the board appointed Hinojosa full superintendent.^[1]

Miles spoke of his impact in the district highlighting the district's updated teacher evaluation system and increase in early childhood education under his leadership. According to NBC 5, Miles stated that he had "made decisions that, while not always popular, were done with the best interests of children and the district in mind."^[18]

Miles joined the school district in 2012 after serving as the superintendent of Harrison School District Two in Colorado for six years. He previously worked as a foreign service officer with the U.S. State Department.^[19]

2015: Forced resignation attempts and a letter of concern[edit]

Following Superintendent Mike Miles' performance review at the board of trustee's meeting on May 1, 2015, the members adopted a letter of concern against Miles but did not fire him. The performance review came after board members Joyce Foreman, Elizabeth Jones and Bernadette Nutall sued the district when a performance review was not scheduled for Miles in a timely manner after they requested one. Dallas County District Judge Carl Ginsberg ruled in favor of the trustees, mandating a special meeting to review the superintendent on May 1, 2015.^[20]

At the meeting, Foreman called for a motion to force Miles to resign in December 2015. The motion failed 6-3, with Jones and Nutall voting with Foreman. Fellow trustee Eric Cowan said he was not satisfied with Miles' performance, but he believed making such a change would be "irresponsible."^[20]

The letter of concern with Miles was passed after the resignation motion failed. The letter was adopted with a vote of 7-2.^[21]

At the meeting, Foreman called Miles' hiring practices questionable, said he was a bad manager and blamed him for the district's high turnover rate. She also criticized an incident from October 2014, when Nutall was physically removed from the premises of Dade Middle School. After her removal from the school, Nutall said that Miles had accused her of trespassing and had ordered the school's officers to escort her out. She had arrived at the building shortly before a staff meeting that was only supposed to include staff members and district administrators. Nutall said she had not planned on attending the meeting, asserting that she had only gone to the school to encourage the teachers there. After the incident, both Nutall and Miles asked the other to apologize to the community.^[22]

In response to Foreman's criticisms, Miles told the board he had been hired to reform the district and that he knew it was not going to be an easy process.^[20][21]

2014-2015: Home-rule effort by Support Our Public Schools[edit]

Volunteers with a local group called Support Our Public Schools circulated petitions starting on March 4, 2014, to turn the Dallas Independent School District into a home-rule district. A state law passed in 1995 allowed local residents to replace their existing district structure with a home-rule charter. This charter could bypass some state regulations including minimum salary schedules for teachers, curriculum standards, and the number of days in a school year. On January 20, 2015, a home-rule commission voted 10-5 against granting Dallas a home-rule charter.^[23] Commission members had until June 2015 to develop a home-rule charter for the district. If approved by the Texas Commissioner of Education, voters would have approved or rejected the charter at the polls. State law required a simple majority and at least 25 percent of registered voters to cast ballots in the charter election.^[24]

Support Our Public Schools was a group funded by former hedge fund manager John Arnold and several anonymous donors through his nonprofit organization, the Action Now Initiative. Arnold worked with local officials, including board member Mike Morath, to form the group due to concerns about the district's record of academic performance. Morath supported Support Our Public Schools but did not serve on the group's board.^[25] The organization hoped to complete the entire process in time for the gubernatorial election on November 4, 2014. If successful, Dallas Independent School District would have been the first school district in Texas to use the home-rule charter process.^[24]

Support Our Public Schools submitted more than 48,000 petition signatures to the school district in May 2014. District officials certified that enough valid signatures were submitted to proceed to the next step in the process.^[26][27] The group had to gather at least 24,459 valid signatures, or five percent of registered voters in the district, to force the creation of a charter commission by the school board. School board members appointed 15 members to the charter commission during a meeting on June 19, 2014.^[28]

Two members of the commission were selected by the entire board, four educators were selected by an advisory panel, and each trustee selected one commission member. D. Marcus Ranger, the husband of former trustee Carla Ranger, and Lew Blackburn, Jr., the son of trustee Lew Blackburn Sr., were appointed to the commission. The state's home-rule charter law does not restrict spouses or relatives of current board members from serving on commissions. An article published following the failure of the home-rule effort noted that eight of the nine Dallas board members opposed the initiative, which Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings suggested resulted in anti-initiative appointees. Commission chairman Bob Weiss rejected this argument and stated, "I certainly respect the mayor’s point of view but will politely disagree with the inference that the process was doomed because the commission did not act in good faith. This commission was not responsible for the appointment process."^[23]

The following table details the charter commission, including how they were appointed:^[28]

Charter commission[28]
Member	Appointed by
Bob Weiss	Entire board
Stephanie Elizalde	Entire board
Melissa Malonson	District 1 trustee Elizabeth Jones
Edwin Flores	District 2 trustee Mike Morath
Jeff Veazey	District 3 trustee Dan Micciche
Ricardo Mendez	District 4 trustee Nancy Bingham
Lew Blackburn, Jr.	District 5 trustee Lew Blackburn Sr.
D. Marcus Ranger	District 6 trustee Carla Ranger
Jerome Garza	District 7 trustee Eric Cowan
Danae Gutierrez	District 8 trustee Miguel Solis
Shirley Ison-Newsome	District 9 trustee Bernadette Nutall
Isaac Freeman	Advisory panel
Ron Oliver	Advisory panel
Bonita Reece	Advisory panel
Julie Sandel	Advisory panel

Local officials and advocates debated the group's efforts during the petition drive. Mayor Rawlings supported the effort in order to bring change to the district while board members Lew Blackburn and Bernadette Nutall questioned the motivations of Support Our Public Schools. Superintendent Mike Miles neither endorsed nor rejected the movement but argued the home-rule effort was unnecessary since the district had already initiated reforms.^[29] Alliance-AFT president Rena Honea argued that this effort was "part of a plan to underfund our schools, declare them a failure, and contract out to private operators the control of our neighborhood schools, disenfranchising parents and community stakeholders and de-professionalizing teaching."^[24][30]

Mark Melton, a local attorney and charter supporter, published a seven-page constitution in May 2014 intended to guide the charter commission. This constitution developed by Melton and four colleagues would have left the district largely unchanged. The document proposed a three-term limit on all board members, a provision for recalling board members and an earlier start date for district schools. Melton's proposal would have allowed a recall election to take place if 15 percent of residents in a trustee district signed petitions. He offered the proposals as a reaction to the rancorous debate taking place between Support Our Public Schools volunteers and some district residents.^[27]

2013-2014: Investigation into superintendent legal bills[edit]

In late 2013, the Dallas ISD board of trustees solicited legal opinions regarding legal fees accrued by Superintendent Mike Miles during an investigation into a contract awarded earlier in the year. Miles was billed $18,143 by law firm Adams, Lynch and Loftin for representation during a hearing by arbitrator Paul Coggins in July 2013. The district paid the superintendent's legal fees due to a clause in his contract that covers fees for legal proceedings. The board heard legal opinions during a meeting on February 13, 2014, to determine if reimbursement was appropriate for an internal investigation. Coggins did not find any wrongdoing by Miles in awarding contracts but determined that Miles talked to witnesses throughout the investigation. The final report by Coggins also found that Miles helped write a resignation letter for a former district official that criticized the board of trustees. Miles was given a 90-day employee improvement period and a letter of reprimand after the hearing.^[31]

Contact information[edit]

Dallas Independent School District
9400 N. Central Expressway
Dallas, TX 75231
Phone: 972-925-3700

See also[edit]

Texas	School Board Elections	News and Analysis
List of school districts in Texas Public education in Texas	Texas school board elections, 2021	Analysis of spending in America's largest school districts United States school shootings, 1990-present

External links[edit]

• Search Google News for this topic
• Dallas Independent School District
• Texas Education Agency
• Texas Association of School Boards

Footnotes[edit]

	v • e State of Texas Austin (capital)
Elections	What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures
Government	Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy

v • e List of the largest school districts in Texas Abilene • Aldine • Alief • Allen • Alvin • Amarillo • Arlington • Austin • Bastrop • Beaumont • Belton • Birdville • Brazosport • Brownsville • Bryan • Burleson • Canyon • Carrollton-Farmers Branch • Clear Creek • Clint • College Station • Comal • Conroe • Coppell • Corpus Christi • Crowley • Cypress-Fairbanks • Dallas • Deer Park • Del Valle • Denton • Dickinson • Donna • Duncanville • Eagle Mountain-Saginaw • Eagle Pass • East Central • Ector County • Edgewood • Edinburg Consolidated • El Paso • Fort Bend • Fort Worth • Frisco • Galena Park • Garland • Georgetown • Goose Creek Consolidated • Grand Prairie • Grapevine-Colleyville • Harlandale • Harlingen Consolidated • Hays Consolidated • Houston • Humble • Hurst-Euless-Bedford • IDEA Public Schools • Irving • Judson • Katy • Keller • Killeen • Klein • La Joya • Lamar Consolidated • Laredo • Leander • Lewisville • Los Fresnos Consolidated • Lubbock • Magnolia • Mansfield • McAllen • McKinney • Mesquite • Midland • Mission Consolidated • New Caney • North East • Northside • Northwest • Pasadena • Pearland • Pflugerville • Pharr-San Juan-Alamo • Plano • Richardson • Rio Grande City Consolidated • Rockwall • Round Rock • San Angelo • San Antonio • San Benito Consolidated • San Felipe Del Rio Consolidated • Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City • Sharyland • Socorro • South San Antonio • Southwest • Spring Branch • Spring • Texas College Preparatory Academies • Tomball • Tyler • United • Victoria • Waco • Weslaco • Wichita Falls • Wylie • Ysleta

Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Original source: https://ballotpedia.org/Dallas_Independent_School_District,_Texas
Status: cached on November 18 2021 15:16:09