Dearborn Public Schools |
---|
Wayne County, Michigan |
District details |
Superintendent: Glenn Maleyko |
# of school board members: 7 |
Website: Link |
Dearborn Public Schools is a school district in Michigan.
Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates. |
Glenn Maleyko is the superintendent of Dearborn Public Schools. Maleyko was appointed superintendent in 2015. Maleyko's previous career experience includes working in the district as the executive director of staff and student services, the director of human resources, and a teacher.[1]
The Dearborn Board of Education consists of seven members elected at large to six-year terms.[2]
Office | Name | Date assumed office |
---|---|---|
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Hussein Berry | 2017 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Patrick D'Ambrosio | January 1, 2021 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Roxanne McDonald | 2019 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Adel Mozip | April 15, 2019 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Mary K. Petlichkoff | 2014 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Jim Thorpe | 2017 |
Dearborn Board of Education At-large | Irene Watts | January 1, 2021 |
This officeholder information was last updated on March 30, 2022. Please contact us with any updates. |
Members of the Dearborn Board of Education are elected to six-year terms on a staggered basis. Each election is held in November of even-numbered years.[2]
A general election is scheduled for November 8, 2022.
The Dearborn Public Schools school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[2]
“ | Meeting comment forms
Dearborn Public Schools is offering the opportunity for the public to submit comments to the board without attending the Board meetings while current safeguards are still in place regarding COVID-19. Meetings will be shown live on our YouTube Channel and Cable channel. To allow the public to participate during the meetings, we have created Google Forms where people can submit comments. The forms are listed by meeting date below. Please note, forms will only be active on the day of the meeting starting at least an hour before the meeting is scheduled to start.[3] |
” |
From 1993 to 2013, the Dearborn school district had an average of $183,603,571 in revenue and $190,201,000 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $137,382,381 in outstanding debt. The district retired $13,742,762 of its debt and issued $19,780,190 in new debt each year on average.[4]
The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.
Revenue by Source | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total | |||||||
Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue |
Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $93,602,000 | 88.38% | $9,366,000 | 8.84% | $2,940,000 | 2.78% | $105,908,000 | ||||
1994 | $105,520,000 | 89.30% | $9,025,000 | 7.64% | $3,624,000 | 3.07% | $118,169,000 | ||||
1995 | $60,619,000 | 49.77% | $57,086,000 | 46.87% | $4,089,000 | 3.36% | $121,794,000 | ||||
1996 | $64,217,000 | 49.07% | $61,130,000 | 46.71% | $5,528,000 | 4.22% | $130,875,000 | ||||
1997 | $67,315,000 | 48.14% | $65,356,000 | 46.74% | $7,150,000 | 5.11% | $139,821,000 | ||||
1998 | $67,814,000 | 43.53% | $80,667,000 | 51.78% | $7,321,000 | 4.70% | $155,802,000 | ||||
1999 | $68,894,000 | 44.95% | $75,955,000 | 49.56% | $8,415,000 | 5.49% | $153,264,000 | ||||
2000 | $70,430,000 | 43.24% | $82,862,000 | 50.88% | $9,577,000 | 5.88% | $162,869,000 | ||||
2001 | $69,624,000 | 39.93% | $94,006,000 | 53.91% | $10,750,000 | 6.16% | $174,380,000 | ||||
2002 | $71,117,000 | 38.31% | $102,724,000 | 55.33% | $11,811,000 | 6.36% | $185,652,000 | ||||
2003 | $83,447,000 | 41.66% | $108,017,000 | 53.93% | $8,818,000 | 4.40% | $200,282,000 | ||||
2004 | $83,864,000 | 41.07% | $107,325,000 | 52.56% | $12,988,000 | 6.36% | $204,177,000 | ||||
2005 | $85,841,000 | 41.50% | $108,141,000 | 52.28% | $12,859,000 | 6.22% | $206,841,000 | ||||
2006 | $83,339,000 | 39.62% | $112,805,000 | 53.63% | $14,180,000 | 6.74% | $210,324,000 | ||||
2007 | $91,710,000 | 40.55% | $119,941,000 | 53.03% | $14,539,000 | 6.43% | $226,190,000 | ||||
2008 | $87,230,000 | 38.91% | $121,414,000 | 54.15% | $15,561,000 | 6.94% | $224,205,000 | ||||
2009 | $78,037,000 | 33.86% | $127,467,000 | 55.31% | $24,963,000 | 10.83% | $230,467,000 |
2010 | $76,802,000 | 33.79% | $122,461,000 | 53.88% | $28,015,000 | 12.33% | $227,278,000 |
2011 | $67,979,000 | 30.11% | $129,968,000 | 57.57% | $27,801,000 | 12.32% | $225,748,000 |
2012 | $75,737,000 | 33.20% | $132,396,000 | 58.04% | $19,980,000 | 8.76% | $228,113,000 |
2013 | $70,976,000 | 31.75% | $134,267,000 | 60.07% | $18,273,000 | 8.18% | $223,516,000 |
Avg. | $77,338,762 | 44.79% | $93,446,619 | 48.70% | $12,818,190 | 6.51% | $183,603,571 |
The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:
Expenditures by Category | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget Total | |||||
Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget |
Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $49,777,000 | 40.51% | $38,666,000 | 31.47% | $30,248,000 | 24.62% | $2,902,000 | 2.36% | $1,289,000 | 1.05% | $122,882,000 |
1994 | $59,004,000 | 43.72% | $41,834,000 | 31.00% | $28,764,000 | 21.31% | $2,977,000 | 2.21% | $2,379,000 | 1.76% | $134,958,000 |
1995 | $60,470,000 | 45.91% | $41,725,000 | 31.68% | $21,831,000 | 16.57% | $4,818,000 | 3.66% | $2,873,000 | 2.18% | $131,717,000 |
1996 | $65,647,000 | 46.76% | $43,687,000 | 31.12% | $24,990,000 | 17.80% | $5,069,000 | 3.61% | $1,000,000 | 0.71% | $140,393,000 |
1997 | $71,475,000 | 50.92% | $48,296,000 | 34.41% | $14,225,000 | 10.13% | $4,459,000 | 3.18% | $1,911,000 | 1.36% | $140,366,000 |
1998 | $74,927,000 | 52.10% | $48,557,000 | 33.76% | $11,635,000 | 8.09% | $6,802,000 | 4.73% | $1,891,000 | 1.31% | $143,812,000 |
1999 | $78,894,000 | 51.38% | $53,405,000 | 34.78% | $13,465,000 | 8.77% | $5,478,000 | 3.57% | $2,313,000 | 1.51% | $153,555,000 |
2000 | $85,752,000 | 53.42% | $59,418,000 | 37.01% | $9,515,000 | 5.93% | $4,694,000 | 2.92% | $1,148,000 | 0.72% | $160,527,000 |
2001 | $94,144,000 | 53.67% | $65,874,000 | 37.55% | $8,541,000 | 4.87% | $4,448,000 | 2.54% | $2,418,000 | 1.38% | $175,425,000 |
2002 | $100,823,000 | 53.47% | $67,856,000 | 35.98% | $14,317,000 | 7.59% | $2,713,000 | 1.44% | $2,868,000 | 1.52% | $188,577,000 |
2003 | $100,551,000 | 44.88% | $70,648,000 | 31.54% | $42,397,000 | 18.93% | $7,258,000 | 3.24% | $3,166,000 | 1.41% | $224,020,000 |
2004 | $100,434,000 | 40.48% | $75,099,000 | 30.27% | $60,847,000 | 24.52% | $9,275,000 | 3.74% | $2,476,000 | 1.00% | $248,131,000 |
2005 | $107,766,000 | 42.27% | $79,490,000 | 31.18% | $55,957,000 | 21.95% | $8,859,000 | 3.48% | $2,852,000 | 1.12% | $254,924,000 |
2006 | $113,527,000 | 51.07% | $80,935,000 | 36.41% | $17,842,000 | 8.03% | $7,744,000 | 3.48% | $2,244,000 | 1.01% | $222,292,000 |
2007 | $114,550,000 | 52.45% | $81,926,000 | 37.51% | $12,516,000 | 5.73% | $7,519,000 | 3.44% | $1,879,000 | 0.86% | $218,390,000 |
2008 | $118,603,000 | 53.40% | $85,276,000 | 38.39% | $8,162,000 | 3.67% | $7,699,000 | 3.47% | $2,372,000 | 1.07% | $222,112,000 |
2009 | $122,088,000 | 53.31% | $88,567,000 | 38.67% | $8,748,000 | 3.82% | $7,377,000 | 3.22% | $2,225,000 | 0.97% | $229,005,000 |
2010 | $122,073,000 | 54.67% | $85,692,000 | 38.38% | $6,098,000 | 2.73% | $7,198,000 | 3.22% | $2,238,000 | 1.00% | $223,299,000 |
2011 | $125,313,000 | 55.42% | $80,843,000 | 35.75% | $10,104,000 | 4.47% | $7,344,000 | 3.25% | $2,500,000 | 1.11% | $226,104,000 |
2012 | $119,672,000 | 54.90% | $80,855,000 | 37.10% | $7,783,000 | 3.57% | $7,039,000 | 3.23% | $2,616,000 | 1.20% | $217,965,000 |
2013 | $122,816,000 | 56.92% | $81,312,000 | 37.69% | $2,548,000 | 1.18% | $6,175,000 | 2.86% | $2,916,000 | 1.35% | $215,767,000 |
Avg. | $95,633,619 | 50.08% | $66,664,810 | 34.84% | $19,549,190 | 10.68% | $6,087,952 | 3.18% | $2,265,429 | 1.22% | $190,201,000 |
The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.
Debt | |||
---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Retired | Issued | Outstanding |
Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | |||
---|---|---|---|
1993 | $3,150,000 | $40,150,000 | $77,455,000 |
1994 | $32,030,000 | $48,800,000 | $86,725,000 |
1995 | $1,705,000 | $7,600,000 | $92,620,000 |
1996 | $2,195,000 | $0 | $90,425,000 |
1997 | $4,459,000 | $7,000,000 | $96,391,000 |
1998 | $14,415,000 | $11,585,000 | $95,570,000 |
1999 | $2,800,000 | $0 | $72,115,000 |
2000 | $4,270,000 | $0 | $89,095,000 |
2001 | $4,270,000 | $0 | $91,478,000 |
2002 | $3,515,000 | $103,451,000 | $161,311,000 |
2003 | $10,115,000 | $44,305,000 | $193,370,000 |
2004 | $10,060,000 | $8,385,000 | $191,695,000 |
2005 | $9,515,000 | $0 | $187,001,000 |
2006 | $10,203,000 | $0 | $177,702,000 |
2007 | $101,771,000 | $95,510,000 | $171,413,000 |
2008 | $12,328,000 | $18,590,000 | $195,005,000 |
2009 | $11,363,000 | $5,937,000 | $264,264,000 |
2010 | $11,484,000 | $14,839,000 | $167,328,000 |
2011 | $12,328,000 | $0 | $135,640,000 |
2012 | $13,751,000 | $0 | $121,614,000 |
2013 | $12,871,000 | $9,232,000 | $126,813,000 |
Avg. | $13,742,762 | $19,780,190 | $137,382,381 |
The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.
Year | Minimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|
2020-2021[5] | $43,153 | $92,860 |
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[6]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[7]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 40 | 60-64 | 26 | 30-34 | <50 | 21-39 | 40 |
2017-2018 | 32 | 40-44 | 18 | 30-34 | <50 | 21-39 | 33 |
2016-2017 | 37 | 55-59 | 18 | 25-29 | <50 | 21-39 | 37 |
2015-2016 | 38 | 45-49 | 20 | 30-34 | <50 | 21-39 | 39 |
2014-2015 | 44 | 50-54 | 22 | 35-39 | <50 | 40-59 | 45 |
2013-2014 | 44 | 50-54 | 22 | 30-34 | <50 | <50 | 46 |
2012-2013 | 41 | 45-49 | 22 | 25-29 | <50 | 21-39 | 42 |
2011-2012 | 39 | 45-49 | 22 | 20-24 | <50 | 21-39 | 40 |
2010-2011 | 82 | 90-94 | 71 | 75-79 | ≥50 | 60-79 | 82 |
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[7]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 47 | 60-64 | 42 | 55-59 | ≥50 | 40-59 | 47 |
2017-2018 | 36 | 45-49 | 30 | 35-39 | ≥50 | 21-39 | 36 |
2016-2017 | 44 | 55-59 | 41 | 45-49 | ≥50 | 40-59 | 44 |
2015-2016 | 47 | 55-59 | 41 | 50-54 | ≥50 | 40-59 | 47 |
2014-2015 | 57 | 60-64 | 46 | 60-64 | ≥50 | 60-79 | 57 |
2013-2014 | 60 | 80-84 | 55 | 60-64 | ≥50 | ≥50 | 60 |
2012-2013 | 59 | 65-69 | 55 | 60-64 | ≥50 | 60-79 | 59 |
2011-2012 | 56 | 60-64 | 46 | 50-54 | ≥50 | 40-59 | 56 |
2010-2011 | 76 | 85-89 | 73 | 75-79 | ≥50 | 60-79 | 77 |
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[7][8]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-2018 | 95 | ≥50 | 80-89 | ≥90 | PS | PS | 95 |
2016-2017 | 95 | ≥80 | 85-89 | ≥80 | PS | PS | 95 |
2015-2016 | 93 | ≥50 | 85-89 | ≥80 | PS | PS | 93 |
2014-2015 | 90 | ≥80 | 80-84 | 80-89 | PS | PS | 91 |
2013-2014 | 87 | ≥50 | 70-79 | 80-89 | PS | PS | 88 |
2012-2013 | 86 | ≥50 | 75-79 | 80-89 | PS | PS | 87 |
2011-2012 | 83 | ≥50 | 70-74 | 60-79 | PS | PS | 83 |
2010-2011 | 76 | ≥50 | 65-69 | 60-79 | PS | PS | 77 |
Year[9] | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 20,647 | -0.8 |
2017-2018 | 20,814 | 0.9 |
2016-2017 | 20,635 | 4.3 |
2015-2016 | 19,777 | 1.7 |
2014-2015 | 19,446 | 1.5 |
2013-2014 | 19,155 | 1.4 |
2012-2013 | 18,882 | 0.9 |
2011-2012 | 18,705 | 3.0 |
2010-2011 | 18,152 | -2.1 |
2009-2010 | 18,532 | 3.0 |
2008-2009 | 17,999 | 1.1 |
2007-2008 | 17,798 | -3.5 |
2006-2007 | 18,445 | 4.3 |
2005-2006 | 17,679 | 0.1 |
2004-2005 | 17,659 | -2.3 |
2003-2004 | 18,083 | 2.6 |
2002-2003 | 17,622 | -4.2 |
2001-2002 | 18,400 | 8.1 |
2000-2001 | 17,014 | 5.8 |
1999-2000 | 16,081 | -2.4 |
1998-1999 | 16,480 | 4.3 |
1997-1998 | 15,807 | 2.7 |
1996-1997 | 15,393 | 0.5 |
1995-1996 | 15,319 | 6.8 |
1994-1995 | 14,349 | 10.6 |
1993-1994 | 12,972 | -7.3 |
1992-1993 | 13,999 | 3.2 |
1991-1992 | 13,566 | 1.4 |
1990-1991 | 13,380 | 3.3 |
1989-1990 | 12,950 | 1.8 |
1988-1989 | 12,725 | 0.6 |
1987-1988 | 12,646 | 1.5 |
1986-1987 | 12,461 | - |
During the 2018-2019 school year, 75.8% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 47.3% were English language learners, and 8.5% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP).[11]
Racial Demographics, 2018-2019 | ||
---|---|---|
Race | Dearborn Public Schools (%) | Michigan K-12 students (%) |
American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.1 | 0.6 |
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 0.9 | 3.4 |
Black | 2.8 | 17.9 |
Hispanic | 1.8 | 8.1 |
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Two or More Races | 0.2 | 4.2 |
White | 94.1 | 65.8 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
Dearborn Public Schools
18700 Audette St.
Dearborn, MI 48124
Phone: 313-827-3000
Michigan | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
---|---|---|
|
State of Michigan Lansing (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2022 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |