This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
Healthcare policy in West Virginia | |
| |
State overview | |
State population: 1,832,500 | |
Percent uninsured: 13% | |
Total healthcare spending: $13,964,085,000 | |
Percent of gross state product: 23.4% | |
Total Medicaid spending: $2,789,587,443 | |
Total Medicare spending: $3,520,774,000 | |
Median annual income: $43,361 | |
Average family premium: $17,105 | |
Average employee contribution: $2,931 | |
Percent of income: 6.8% | |
State healthcare policy | |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming | |
Healthcare policy in the U.S. • Medicare • Medicaid • Obamacare overview | |
Years of data (most recent available as of August 2015): •2013: State population, percent uninsured, median annual income, average family premium, average employee contribution, and percent of income. •2012: Total Medicaid spending. •2009: Total healthcare spending, percent of gross state product, and total Medicare spending. |
Healthcare policy in West Virginia involves the creation and implementation of laws, rules, and regulations for managing the state's healthcare system. The healthcare system consists of services provided by medical professionals to diagnose, treat, and prevent mental and physical illness and injury. The system also encompasses a wide range of related sectors, such as insurance, pharmaceuticals and health information technology.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the 50 state legislatures collectively "make thousands of health policy decisions each year," not including the decisions made by local governments, which often oversee hospitals, and private bodies, such as insurers. These decisions can include budget appropriations, requirements for doctors obtaining their licenses, which services are covered by insurance, how personal health information is managed, and which immunizations children must receive, among many others.[1]
Healthcare policy affects not only the cost citizens must pay for care, but also their access to care and the quality of care received, which can influence their overall health. A top concern for policymakers is the rising cost of healthcare, which has placed an increasing strain on the disposable income of consumers as well as on state budgets.
Other issues in healthcare policy include
In the early years of the United States, healthcare was provided by wives and mothers in the home, with occasional home visits by doctors. Medical colleges were established starting in the late 1700s, providing formal scientific training and licensing to physicians. The role of doctors became more authoritative and pronounced with further advancements in science and the growth of cities, which presented health hazards due to overcrowding, poor sanitation and attendant disease.[2][3][4]
In 1846 a group of physicians formed the American Medical Association (AMA) with the early mission of (and achievement of) state regulation of pharmaceuticals. As medicine grew more professionalized, private health insurance pools were established, and employers and unions began offering some medical benefits to workers. The model of payment known as "fee-for-service," in which doctors are paid for each treatment, test and office visit, emerged.[2]
Though once housing primarily very poor, terminally ill patients, hospitals evolved to more closely resemble the institutions they are today. This was in part due to the development of antiseptics—allowing for more sanitary treatment conditions—and better education of physicians. It was also partly due to their role in the development of employer-sponsored insurance by offering plans for public school teachers, which allowed them to go to hospitals for more routine treatments. The employer-sponsored insurance model spread during World War II, when government wage controls prompted employers to offer health benefits rather than higher salaries in order to attract workers. This model grew more popular after the war when payments by employers toward employee health insurance were made tax-exempt.[2][5][6]
Throughout the mid-20th century, Congress established federal agencies dedicated to healthcare policy, including the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Health and Human Services. The federal government also enacted a number of pieces of healthcare legislation during the second half of the century:
Though there have been steady calls for a national health insurance program since the early 1900s, no such measure has been adopted in the United States.[2]
Today, the healthcare industry is an immense part of the nation's economy. Healthcare spending amounts to about one-sixth of the nation's gross domestic product and health expenditures account for about one-fourth to one-third of state budgets. Healthcare regulation and policy is complex, with nearly "every aspect of the field ... overseen by one regulatory body or another, and sometimes by several." Such regulations are enforced by federal, state and local governments, and even private organizations. The 2010 passage of Obamacare introduced experimentation and uncertainty into the industry, which will be watched closely over the next several years to gauge the lasting effects of its policies.[1][7][8][9]
Back to top↑ |
Terms and definitions | |
Hover over each term to display a definition. | |
Fee-for-service | |
Gross domestic product | |
Gross state product | |
Managed care | |
Medical durables | |
Medical nondurables | |
National health insurance | |
Premium | |
Scheduled drugs | |
The tables below compare demographic and economic statistics for West Virginia and surrounding states, since both factors significantly impact healthcare and healthcare policy. Also provided is general information on the insurance coverage of individuals in each state.
A major concern for the healthcare industry is the shifting demographic makeup of the nation and its states. Different groups of people tend to use different health services, like men and women, for example. In particular, persons aged 65 and older comprise an increasing share of the total population, with that share expected to reach 20.2 percent by 2050. This trend has had a part in the increase in demand for healthcare services and the related increase in costs. It will also influence the federal budget, as more and more seniors join Medicare.[10]
In 2013, West Virginia had a higher portion of residents that were age 55 and over than its neighboring states and a smaller portion that were children 18 and under.[11][12][13]
Age and gender demographics, 2013 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total residents | Children 0-18 | Adults 19-64 | 65+ | Male | Female | ||
West Virginia | 1,832,500 | 22% | 60% | 17% | 49% | 51% | ||
Kentucky | 4,371,300 | 24% | 63% | 14% | 49% | 51% | ||
Ohio | 11,477,300 | 24% | 60% | 16% | 49% | 51% | ||
Virginia | 8,180,700 | 24% | 62% | 14% | 49% | 51% | ||
United States | 313,395,400 | 25% | 61% | 14% | 49% | 51% | ||
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
Broadly defined, a healthy economy is typically one that has a "stable and strong rate of economic growth" (gross state product, in this case) and low unemployment, among many other factors. The economic health of a state can significantly affect its healthcare costs, insurance coverage, access to care, and the physical and mental health of its citizens. For instance, during economic downturns, employers may reduce insurance coverage for employees, while those who are laid off may lose coverage altogether. Individuals also tend to spend less on non-urgent care or postpone visits to the doctor when times are hard. These changes in turn may affect the decisions made by policymakers as they react to shifts in the industry. Additionally, a person's socioeconomic status has profound effects on their access to care and the quality of care received.[14][15][16]
The greatest portion of West Virginia's population earned annual incomes between 200 and 399 percent of the federal poverty level, with a median annual household income of $43,361, above only that of Kentucky. West Virginia was one of only five states nationwide whose unemployment rates rose between September 2013 and September 2014.[17][18][19][20]
Note: Gross state product (GSP) on its own is not necessarily an indicator of economic health; GSP may also be influenced by state population size. Many factors must be looked at together to assess state economic health.
Various economic indicators by state | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Distribution of population by FPL* (2013) | Median annual income† | Unemployment rate | Total GSP (2013)‡ | ||||
Under 100% | 100-199% | 200-399% | 400%+ | Sept. 2013 | Sept. 2014 | |||
West Virginia | 18% | 22% | 33% | 27% | $43,361 | 6.4% | 6.6% | $73,970 |
Kentucky | 20% | 22% | 30% | 28% | $42,260 | 8.3% | 6.7% | $183,373 |
Ohio | 14% | 21% | 33% | 32% | $46,672 | 7.4% | 5.6% | $565,272 |
Virginia | 11% | 15% | 26% | 48% | $65,635 | 5.5% | 5.5% | $452,585 |
United States | 15% | 19% | 30% | 36% | $52,047 | 7.2% | 5.9% | $16,701,415 |
* Federal Poverty Level. "The U.S. Census Bureau's poverty threshold for a family with two adults and one child was $18,751 in 2013. This is the official measurement of poverty used by the Federal Government." † Median annual household income, 2011-2013. ‡ In millions of current dollars. "Gross State Product is a measurement of a state's output; it is the sum of value added from all industries in the state." Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
In general, employers have been the dominant source of health insurance for individuals since the late 1940s and 1950s. This can be at least partially attributed to the income tax exemption granted to employers for payments made toward health insurance for employees. The second major sources of health insurance are the state and federal governments, which jointly provide Medicaid for low-income individuals while the federal government sponsors Medicare for the elderly and disabled.[21]
Compared to neighboring states, West Virginia had the smallest portion of residents covered by employer-sponsored insurance and the highest portions enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare in 2013. The state's uninsured rate was 13 percent, about on par with that of its neighbors and equal to the national rate.[22]
Health insurance coverage by source, 2013 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Employer | Other private | Medicaid | Medicare | Other public | Uninsured |
West Virginia | 44% | 4% | 19% | 20% | N/A | 13% |
Kentucky | 47% | 4% | 17% | 16% | 3% | 13% |
Ohio | 47% | 6% | 15% | 17% | 2% | 13% |
Virginia | 55% | 6% | 9% | 13% | 6% | 11% |
United States | 48% | 6% | 16% | 15% | 2% | 13% |
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
The 1980s saw a peak in the percentage of people who were receiving health coverage through their employers, with a continuous decline in the rate thereafter. A study by researchers at the University of Minnesota’s State Health Access Data Assistance Center, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, found that, despite the tax exemption, fewer employers are choosing to offer health coverage to their employees, and when it is offered, fewer employees are enrolling.[21][23]
Among its neighboring states, West Virginia saw the smallest rates of change in insurance coverage between 2000 and 2012, with the exception of the decrease in employer-sponsored insurance. The portion of residents covered by their employers fell by 8.2 percentage points, which was slightly greater than that in Virginia. Click 'show' on the table below to view more comparisons.[24]
Change in health insurance coverage by source, 2000-2012 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
State | Change (in percentage points) | |||
Medicaid enrollment | Employer-sponsored insurance | Medicare enrollment | Uninsured rate | |
West Virginia | 2.9 | -8.2 | 1.5 | 1 |
Kentucky | 3.3 | -10.8 | 2.9 | 3 |
Ohio | 7.5 | -13.6 | 3.7 | 2.5 |
Virginia | 3.2 | -8.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 |
United States | 5.8 | -10 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "State Health Care Spending on Medicaid" |
Back to top↑ |
Healthcare spending and costs have become a top priority for both state and federal legislators amid growing concern from consumers and employers. Healthcare spending as a percentage of the national gross domestic product (GDP) increased from 5 percent in 1960 to reach 17.4 percent in 2009, or over one-sixth of the nation's economy, where it remained steady through 2013. Total healthcare spending in both the public and private sectors amounted to $2.9 trillion in 2013. Federal, state and local governments were responsible for about 43 percent of that spending. Projections have shown that if healthcare spending continues to increase at its current rate, it will reach 19.3 percent of GDP in 2023.[25][26][27][28]
The rise in spending has been attributed partially to increased demand, but in large part to the increased price of delivering and receiving care.
“ |
Between January 1988 and January 2009, the consumer price index (CPI) rose 82 percent, while the medical component of CPI rose 175 percent.[29] |
” |
—National Conference of State Legislatures |
Such costs mean less disposable income for consumers, greater expenses to hire new employees for employers and difficulty writing budgets for lawmakers.[30][31]
In 2009, the most recent year for which state-level data are available, total healthcare spending nationwide was $2.5 trillion. In West Virginia, total healthcare spending amounted to nearly $14 billion, 23.4 percent of gross state product (GSP), the highest percentage among neighboring states. Per person, spending figures equaled about $7,667.[32][33][34]
Total healthcare spending*, 2009 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total health spending (in millions) | Percent of GSP | Health spending per capita | Avg. annual percent growth† |
West Virginia | $13,964 | 23.4% | $7,667 | 6.3% |
Kentucky | $28,443 | 18.7% | $6,596 | 6.7% |
Ohio | $81,598 | 18.1% | $7,076 | 5.8% |
Virginia | $49,427 | 12.2% | $6,286 | 6.9% |
United States‡ | $2,505,800 | 17.4% | $8,175 | 6.8% |
* "Total Health Spending includes spending for all privately and publicly funded personal health care services and products (hospital care, physician services, nursing home care, prescription drugs, etc.) by state of residence. Hospital spending is included and reflects the total net revenue (gross charges less contractual adjustments, bad debts, and charity care)." † 1991–2009 ‡ Data come directly from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "NHE Summary including share of GDP, CY 1960-2013" Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
The portion of spending on hospital care in West Virginia was 4 percentage points larger than the nationwide figure. Hospital care, physician and professional services, and prescription drugs and other medical nondurables accounted for the bulk of healthcare spending in the state.[35]
Back to top↑ |
During fiscal year 2012, combined federal and state spending for Medicaid, a government health insurance program primarily for low-income and disabled persons, was lower in West Virginia than in its neighboring states, totaling about $2.8 billion. However, spending per enrollee was the highest at $7,642. The federal government contributed more funding to the program than the state government, 73 percent of the total amount. The portion of the state's budget dedicated to Medicaid was smaller in West Virginia when compared to its neighboring states.[36][37][38][39][40]
Medicaid spending, fiscal year 2012 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total spending*† | Per enrollee*† | Total growth‡ | Compound annual growth rate‡ | Federal share* | State share* | Percent of state budget |
West Virginia | $2,789,587,443 | $7,642 | 59% | 3.9% | 73% | 27% | 12.7% |
Kentucky | $5,701,684,085 | $7,138 | 43% | 3% | 71% | 29% | 22.5% |
Ohio | $16,352,195,540 | $7,508 | 69% | 4.4% | 64% | 36% | 24.4% |
Virginia | $6,906,432,609 | $7,452 | 92% | 5.6% | 50% | 50% | 16.2% |
United States | $415,154,234,831 | $6,833 | 63% | 4.1% | 57% | 43% | N/A |
* "Expenditures do not include administrative costs, accounting adjustments, or the U.S. Territories." † Includes both state and federal expenditures. ‡ 2000–2012. Includes payments for services, administrative expenses, and DSH payments. |
Acute care services are those that are typically provided within a short time frame, such as inpatient hospital stays, lab tests and prescription drugs. Long-term care services, on the other hand, are those provided over a long period of time, such as home care and mental health treatment. Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments are funds given to hospitals that tend to serve more low-income and uninsured patients than other hospitals. Compared to its neighboring states, acute care accounted for a smaller portion of total Medicaid spending in West Virginia. Long-term care services accounted for 44 percent, with the remaining 2.7 percent spent on payments to DSHs.[41]
In 2010, there were 416,858 West Virginia residents enrolled in Medicaid. The majority of spending, 72 percent, was on the elderly and disabled, who made up 38 percent of Medicaid enrollees. This is typical of most states, since this group of enrollees is "more likely to have complex health care needs that require costly acute and long-term care services," according to the Pew Charitable Trusts. The proportion of these individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid is taken into consideration when lawmakers make appropriations for the program each year.[42]
Distribution of Medicaid enrollment and payments, 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Enrollment rates | Payment for services | ||||
Total | Elderly and disabled individuals | Parents and children | Total (in billions) | Elderly and disabled individuals | Parents and children | |
West Virginia | 416,858 | 38% | 62% | $2.5 | 72% | 28% |
Kentucky | 919,864 | 36% | 64% | $5.5 | 63% | 37% |
Ohio | 2,308,999 | 25% | 75% | $14.5 | 72% | 28% |
Virginia | 1,027,075 | 28% | 72% | $6.1 | 64% | 36% |
United States | 66,390,642 | 24% | 76% | $369.3 | 64% | 36% |
Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "State Health Care Spending on Medicaid" |
Medicare is a federal health insurance program for elderly persons over age 65 and younger individuals with certain disabilities. Medicare accounted for 14 percent of the federal budget in 2013. In 2009, the most recent year for which state spending data is available, total federal Medicare spending for enrollees in West Virginia amounted to $3.5 billion. Total spending increased at the same rate in West Virginia as in Ohio and at a slower rate than in Kentucky and Virginia. Per enrollee spending amounted to $9,333 and grew at a similar rate to West Virginia's neighboring states.[43][44][45][46]
Medicare spending and growth, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total (in millions) | Average annual growth rate* | Per enrollee | Average annual growth rate* | ||
West Virginia | $3,521 | 7.6% | $9,333 | 6.5% | ||
Kentucky | $7,162 | 8.3% | $9,634 | 6.4% | ||
Ohio | $19,263 | 7.6% | $10,300 | 6.5% | ||
Virginia | $9,736 | 8.5% | $8,772 | 6.1% | ||
United States | $471,260 | 8.0% | $10,362 | 6.4% | ||
* 1991–2009 Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
In 2012, there were 392,021 individuals in West Virginia enrolled in Medicare, or 21.1 percent of the state population, the highest portion compared to neighboring states. Aged beneficiaries made up 72.9 percent of the total number, while 27.1 percent were disabled.[47][48][49]
Medicare beneficiaries, 2012 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Number | Percent of population | Eligibility category | ||
Aged | Disabled | ||||
West Virginia | 392,021 | 21.1% | 72.9% | 27.1% | |
Kentucky | 793,271 | 18.2% | 71.9% | 28.1% | |
Ohio | 1,971,260 | 17.1% | 81.5% | 18.5% | |
Virginia | 1,203,462 | 14.9% | 81.6% | 18.4% | |
United States | 49,435,610 | 16.0% | 81.4% | 18.6% | |
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
Some individuals, such as low-income seniors, are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid; these individuals are known as dual-eligible beneficiaries. For those enrolled in Medicare who are eligible, enrolling in Medicaid may provide some benefits not covered by Medicare, such as stays longer than 100 days at nursing facilities, prescription drugs, eyeglasses, and hearing aids. Medicaid may also be used to help pay for Medicare premiums. Total Medicaid spending for dual eligibles in West Virginia amounted to over $1 billion. Most payments were made toward long-term care.[50][51]
Medicaid spending for dual eligibles by service, fiscal year 2011 (in millions) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Medicare premiums | Acute care | Prescribed drugs | Long-term care | Total | |
West Virginia | $107 | $107 | $12 | $812 | $1,037 | |
Kentucky | $212 | $325 | $40 | $1,241 | $1,817 | |
Ohio | $383 | $1,119 | $120 | $4,779 | $6,400 | |
Virginia | $223 | $387 | $16 | $1,700 | $2,325 | |
United States | $13,489 | $40,190 | $1,462 | $91,765 | $146,906 | |
Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
Back to top↑ |
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court ruled that adequate healthcare for prisoners is a constitutional right and that the refusal to provide them with such is a violation of the Eighth Amendment prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. As such, state budget allocations for correctional facilities, like other healthcare expenditures, have continued to grow, especially as the prison population ages. Correctional healthcare spending nationwide totaled $7.7 billion in 2011, or $6,047 per inmate, which The Pew Charitable Trusts estimated to be about one-fifth of total prison spending. This was up from 2007, but down from a peak in 2009 as the average daily prison population decreased. States have experienced fiscal pressure to manage prison healthcare costs without compromising prisoners' right to quality care.[52]
“ |
The manner in which states manage prison health care services that meet these legal requirements affects not only inmates' health, but also the public's health and safety and taxpayers' total corrections bill.[29] |
” |
—The Pew Charitable Trusts |
Between 2007 and 2011, West Virginia experienced the largest jump in the portion of inmates age 55 and over of its neighboring states and also had the highest percentage of inmates who were seniors in 2011 at 13.2 percent. The average daily prison population increased by 15 percent while total prison healthcare spending increased by 9 percent, which may have contributed to a decrease in per inmate spending of 5 percent.[52]
State spending on prison healthcare | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Category | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Percent change |
West Virginia | Total spending* | $21,291 | $20,669 | $25,074 | $24,931 | $23,150 | 9% |
Daily prison population | 4,448 | 4,917 | 4,940 | 5,052 | 5,093 | 15% | |
Per inmate spending | $4,787 | $4,204 | $5,076 | $4,935 | $4,545 | -5% | |
Percent of inmates age 55+ | 9.3% | 10.9% | 11.1% | 11.6% | 13.2% | 42% | |
Kentucky | Total spending* | $49,933 | $59,279 | $61,226 | $65,587 | $62,972 | 26% |
Daily prison population | 12,154 | 12,205 | 12,101 | 12,234 | 11,684 | -4% | |
Per inmate spending | $4,108 | $4,857 | $5,060 | $5,361 | $5,390 | 31% | |
Percent of inmates age 55+ | 5.3% | 5.5% | 5.8% | 6.4% | 6.3% | 19% | |
Ohio | Total spending* | $287,087 | $281,926 | $303,040 | $301,032 | $279,716 | -3% |
Daily prison population | 46,187 | 47,683 | 48,726 | 48,796 | 48,602 | 5% | |
Per inmate spending | $6,216 | $5,913 | $6,219 | $6,169 | $5,755 | -7% | |
Percent of inmates age 55+ | 5.9% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 6.8% | 7.5% | 28% | |
Virginia | Total spending* | $130,003 | $142,427 | $143,099 | $149,298 | $149,850 | 15% |
Daily prison population | 30,286 | 32,060 | 32,078 | 30,337 | 30,772 | 2% | |
Per inmate spending | $4,293 | $4,443 | $4,461 | $4,921 | $4,870 | 13% | |
Percent of inmates age 55+ | 6.1% | 6.5% | 7.1% | 8% | 8.6% | 41% | |
* In thousands. Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "State Prison Health Care Spending" |
State employee health insurance accounts for the second-largest portion of state healthcare spending, behind only Medicaid. The total cost of insurance for state workers was $30.7 billion nationwide in 2013, with $25.1 billion paid for by the states. Premium costs varied widely, with higher premiums found in states such as New Hampshire and Vermont compared to those in states like Arkansas and Mississippi. Part of this variation is due to demographic factors and provider prices, and part may be attributed to differences in health plan "richness," or the cost sharing between the insurer and health plan enrollees, such as deductibles and copayments.[53]
“ |
State health plans were generally "rich," paying on average 92 percent of the typical enrollees’ health care costs. By way of context, these plans would be designated "platinum" plans within the new health insurance marketplaces.[29] |
” |
—The Pew Charitable Trusts |
Several states are experimenting with various cost-containment methods. "Pooled public employee health benefit programs" are one such strategy, which are mergers between state employee health plans and those of other, smaller public employers, such as city governments and school districts. The idea is to save on administrative costs for insurers and leverage the larger pool to negotiate lower premium rates. Evidence of cost savings is mixed, with the smaller public employers reaping most of the benefits. Programs for pooling public employee health plans have been implemented in 31 states; as of December 2014, West Virginia was one of them. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the state allows city, town and county governments, universities and colleges, and public school districts to join its health plan.[54]
West Virginia is one of 46 states that "self-fund at least one of their employee health care plans," meaning that rather than purchasing insurance, the state pays health insurance claims with state and employee out-of-pocket insurance contributions while an insurer administers the benefits. As of 2013, there were 24 states offering plans with a $0 deductible; West Virginia was not one of these states.[53][54][55]
Net state employee health plan expenditures in West Virginia totaled nearly $217 million in 2013. Among neighboring states, West Virginia tied with Virginia for the largest percent decrease in state health plan expenditures between 2011 and 2013.[53]
Note: Due to such variations as demographics, plan richness and provider rates, "higher spending is not necessarily an indication of waste, and lower spending is not necessarily a sign of efficiency."[53]
State employee health plan spending (in thousands) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total state expenditures (gross) | Change | Total state expenditures (net) | Change | |||
2011 | 2013 | 2011 | 2013 | ||||
West Virginia | $305,171 | $303,365 | -1% | $223,082 | $216,775 | -3% | |
Kentucky | $320,842 | $325,409 | 1% | $245,138 | $247,361 | 1% | |
Ohio | $552,207 | $558,156 | 1% | $460,642 | $470,481 | 2% | |
Virginia | $910,886 | $899,135 | -1% | $813,062 | $788,561 | -3% | |
United States | $30,311,259 | $30,692,147 | 1% | $25,263,863 | $25,071,413 | -1% | |
Note: "Gross expenditures include employer and employee premium contributions. Net expenditures include only employer premium contributions. All spending figures are in 2013 dollars." Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "State Employee Health Plan Spending" |
In West Virginia, average premiums for single coverage were second lowest among neighboring states, while those for family coverage were lowest. The state paid on average 71 percent of the premiums, a lower percentage than any neighboring state.[53]
Average state employee health plan monthly premiums, 2013 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Single | Family | Employer contribution percentage | Employee contribution percentage | ||||
Total premium | Employer contribution | Employee contribution | Total premium | Employer contribution | Employee contribution | |||
West Virginia | $473 | $368 | $106 | $980 | $683 | $297 | 71% | 29% |
Kentucky | $653 | $577 | $76 | $1,258 | $815 | $443 | 76% | 24% |
Ohio | $478 | $406 | $72 | $1,325 | $1,115 | $210 | 84% | 16% |
Virginia | $504 | $450 | $54 | $1,166 | $1,017 | $150 | 88% | 12% |
United States | $570 | $502 | $68 | $1,233 | $1,004 | $230 | 84% | 16% |
Note: "Due to rounding, the sum of employer and employee contributions may differ from total premium." Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "State Employee Health Plan Spending" |
Back to top↑ |
For private insurance, consumers typically either receive coverage through their employer or buy it on their own through the individual market. As healthcare costs have increased, so have insurance premiums. Between 2000 and 2014, insurance premiums for employer-sponsored plans, including state and local government plans, increased 144 percent for single coverage and 161 percent for family coverage. However, the rate of increase has slowed in more recent years. Between 2000 and 2007, premiums grew by 81 percent for single coverage and 88 percent for family coverage. Between 2007 and 2014, the rates of increase were 34.5 percent and 39 percent, respectively.[56]
Employers have reacted to these costs in a number of ways, one of which has been to shift more responsibility for premium contributions to their employees. The portion of premiums paid by employees for single coverage has increased by four percentage points, from 14 percent to 18 percent, since 2000, and by three percentage points, from 26 percent to 29 percent, for family coverage. Average deductibles for employees have also risen, doubling from $584 to $1,135 between 2006 and 2013.[56][57]
In West Virginia's private, employer-based insurance market, average premiums for employer-sponsored coverage amounted to $5,940 for single coverage and $17,105 for family coverage. These figures were above national averages and total premiums in neighboring states. Employees contributed about $1,052 per year for single coverage and $2,931 for family coverage. As shown in the bar chart above, premiums in West Virginia's individual market were higher than in neighboring states, averaging about $275 per month, or $3,300 per year.[58][59][60]
Average annual premiums for private employer-based insurance, 2013 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Single | Family | |||||
Employee contribution | Employer contribution | Total | Employee contribution | Employer contribution | Total | ||
West Virginia | $1,052 | $4,888 | $5,940 | $2,931 | $14,174 | $17,105 | |
Kentucky | $1,215 | $4,042 | $5,257 | $3,898 | $11,565 | $15,463 | |
Ohio | $1,053 | $4,626 | $5,679 | $3,631 | $12,324 | $15,955 | |
Virginia | $1,244 | $4,164 | $5,408 | $4,889 | $11,028 | $15,917 | |
United States | $1,170 | $4,401 | $5,571 | $4,421 | $11,608 | $16,029 | |
Note: "Figures may not sum exactly due to rounding." Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
In 2013, private sector employers in West Virginia contributed on average 82.3 percent to single coverage premiums and 82.9 percent to family coverage premiums, higher portions than in neighboring states. Click on the table below to view further details and state comparisons.[61][62]
Average annual premiums for private employer-based insurance, 2013 (percents) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Single | Family | |||||
Employee contribution | Employer contribution | Total | Employee contribution | Employer contribution | Total | ||
West Virginia | 17.7% | 82.3% | 100% | 17.1% | 82.9% | 100% | |
Kentucky | 23.1% | 76.9% | 100% | 25.2% | 74.8% | 100% | |
Ohio | 18.5% | 81.5% | 100% | 22.8% | 77.2% | 100% | |
Virginia | 23% | 77% | 100% | 30.7% | 69.3% | 100% | |
United States | 21% | 79% | 100% | 27.6% | 72.4% | 100% | |
Note: Percentages calculated by Ballotpedia. Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation measured the competitiveness of the private health insurance market in 2013, using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) as an indicator. The HHI takes into account how much of a market is controlled by each of the companies competing within it (market share) and is expressed in a value between zero and 10,000. The lower the number, the more competitive the market. The analysis was divided into individual, small group and large group insurance markets. The data also includes information on the market share of the largest insurer in each state, as well as the number of insurers with a market share of greater than five percent.[63][64][65][66]
Compared to neighboring states, the large group and small group insurance markets were the least competitive in West Virginia. The largest large-group insurer controlled 84 percent of the market, while the largest small group insurer controlled 70 percent. The individual insurance market's competitiveness fell in the middle, with the largest insurer controlling 62 percent of the market.[63][64][65]
Health insurance market competition, 2013 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Individual | Small group | Large group | ||||||
HHI* | Market share of largest insurer | Insurers with >5% market share | HHI* | Market share of largest insurer | Insurers with >5% market share | HHI* | Market share of largest insurer | Insurers with >5% market share | |
West Virginia | 4,347 | 62% | 3 | 5,498 | 70% | 2 | 7,196 | 84% | 3 |
Kentucky | 6,455 | 79% | 2 | 5,021 | 67% | 3 | 4,696 | 66% | 4 |
Ohio | 2,623 | 35% | 3 | 2,468 | 38% | 5 | 2,293 | 39% | 4 |
Virginia | 5,672 | 74% | 3 | 2,759 | 45% | 5 | 2,539 | 44% | 6 |
United States | 3,888 | 55% | 3 | 3,841 | 57% | 4 | 4,038 | 57% | 4 |
* "The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a measure of how evenly market share is distributed across insurers in the market. HHI values range from 0 to 10,000, with an HHI closer to zero indicating a more competitive market and closer to 10,000 indicating a less competitive market. An HHI index below 1,000 generally indicates a highly competitive market; an HHI between 1,000 and 1,500 indicates an unconcentrated market; a score between 1,500 and 2,500 indicates moderate concentration; and a value above 2,500 indicates a highly concentrated (uncompetitive) market." Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
Back to top↑ |
In the United States, there are more than 10,000 FDA-approved medicines available for doctors to prescribe or individuals to purchase over-the-counter. A major target of state healthcare cost-containment efforts is the price of these medicines. Prescription drugs generated a total of $259 billion in sales at retail pharmacies nationwide in 2014. Since generic drugs tend to be significantly less expensive than their brand name equivalents, all states allow pharmacists to dispense generics in place of brand name drugs for prescriptions. This practice is required in 13 states, except when a brand name drug is specifically ordered by a physician; this group of states includes West Virginia.[67]
Additionally, state Medicaid programs typically take a number of steps to control spending on pharmaceuticals. Most common are establishing preferred drug lists, which are prescription drugs that are automatically covered by the program, and negotiating rebates with manufacturers for both brand name and generic drugs. West Virginia's Medicaid program utilizes both of these strategies and is also a part of a multi-state pool to enhance its buying power.[68]
In 2014, retail sales of prescription drugs at pharmacies in West Virginia amounted to nearly $2.4 billion, with about 39.6 million drugs sold. On average, women and individuals over age 65 bought more prescription drugs than men and those under age 65. These totals do not include medications sold over-the-counter.[69][70][71][72]
Prescription drugs filled at retail pharmacies, 2014 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total sales for retail Rx drugs | Total number retail Rx drugs | Number per capita by age | Number per capita by gender | ||||
Ages 0-18 | Ages 19-64 | Ages 65+ | Male | Female | ||||
West Virginia | $2,381,998,964 | 39,623,231 | 6 | 21.8 | 38.9 | 17.4 | 25.2 | |
Kentucky | $4,887,411,119 | 93,941,118 | 6.8 | 22.3 | 42.5 | 17.5 | 25.2 | |
Ohio | $10,125,964,465 | 184,814,413 | 4.8 | 16.6 | 31.3 | 12.9 | 18.9 | |
Virginia | $6,067,364,675 | 97,240,370 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 27 | 9.7 | 14.1 | |
United States | $259,092,876,285 | 4,002,661,750 | 4.1 | 12.6 | 27.9 | 10.4 | 14.9 | |
Note: "These totals include prescriptions filled at pharmacies only and a small portion of over-the-counter medications and repackagers and exclude those filled by mail order." Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts" |
States are also focusing on curbing prescription drug abuse and fraud as a method to contain costs.[73]
“ |
According to the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, prescription drug misuse, abuse and fraud cost private health insurers almost $25 billion a year.[29] |
” |
—National Conference of State Legislatures |
Between 2004 and 2009, there was a documented increase of 98.4 percent in emergency room visits caused by such abuse and misuse of prescription drugs. As an effort to combat the rise in prescription drug abuse and fraud, all but two states have authorized the development of prescription drug databases that can monitor the dispensing of certain controlled substances. These programs have been bolstered by federal grants encouraging their implementation.[73]
West Virginia has an operational prescription drug monitoring program that monitors the dispensing of Schedule II, Schedule III, Schedule IV and Schedule V drugs. Information must be reported daily by healthcare providers and pharmacies, as well as by veterinarians. These requirements exclude drugs directly administered to inpatients.[74]
Under the current model, access to experimental drugs by terminally ill patients is controlled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which must give its approval after it receives a form from a patient's physician. What are known as "right to try" laws aim to allow such patients to gain access to experimental drugs without the permission of the FDA. As of March 2016, 27 states in total had adopted right-to-try legislation. West Virginia enacted a right-to-try law in March 2016.[75][76]
The HHS on the HIPAA Privacy Rule |
Health information technology (IT) refers to electronic systems that manage, store and transmit health information, such as patient records. The adoption of modernized health IT has been promoted by the federal government as a way to increase quality while decreasing costs. For instance, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 required most health providers to adopt electronic health records by 2015. However, the digitization of health data raises concerns about the privacy of such data, which could be vulnerable to a breach if not properly secured. Since 1996, health IT privacy and security has been governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which required and set national standards for the confidentiality of patient information "when it is transferred, received, handled, or shared."[77][78][79]
All-payer claims databases are one form of health IT that a growing number of states are implementing to track healthcare costs. All-payer claims databases are state systems for collecting data from public and private health insurance claims on demographics, types of services and total charges. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, "the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services plans to build a nationwide all-payer claims database consisting of a representative sample of the population." All-payer claims databases exist in 17 states, while another 17 have demonstrated a "strong interest" in creating one. To view the status of such a program in West Virginia, click here.[80][81][82][83]
Back to top↑ |
Each year, the United Health Foundation releases a report titled "America's Health Rankings," which measures the overall health of the citizens in each state. The United Health Foundation is a nonprofit organization that "provides helpful information to support decisions that lead to better health outcomes and healthier communities." Factors taken into account for the report include the percentage of the state population that smokes tobacco, incidents of infectious diseases such as Salmonella, percent of the population uninsured, the number of primary care physicians, and the rate of infant mortality, among others.[84][85]
In its 2014 report, West Virginia ranked 44th in the nation, up from 46th in 2013 and 47th in 2012. Although the rate of drug deaths increased and there was a high prevalence of smoking in the state, the immunization coverage of adolescents increased and there was a low rate of binge drinking.[84]
Compared to neighboring states, West Virginia ranked lower than Virginia (21st) and Ohio (40th), but higher than Kentucky (47th). To read the full report, click here.[84]
The following is a list of recent healthcare policy bills that have been introduced in or passed by the West Virginia state legislature. To learn more about each of these bills, click the bill title. This information is provided by BillTrack50 and LegiScan.
Note: Due to the nature of the sorting process used to generate this list, some results may not be relevant to the topic. If no bills are displayed below, then no legislation pertaining to this topic has been introduced in the legislature recently.
Ballotpedia has tracked no ballot measures relating to healthcare matters in West Virginia.
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms West Virginia healthcare. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
Back to top↑ |