Manteca Unified School District, California
From Ballotpedia - Reading time: 11 min
| Manteca Unified School District |
|---|
 |
| San Joaquin County, California |
| District details |
| Superintendent: Clark Burke |
| # of school board members: 7 |
| Website: Link |
Manteca Unified School District is a school district in California.
Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...
- Superintendent
- School board
- Elections
- Budget
- Teacher salaries
- Academic performance
- Student enrollment
- Demographics
- Contact information
Contents
Superintendent[edit]
 |
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates. |
Clark Burke is the superintendent of the Manteca Unified School District. Burke was appointed interim superintendent in May 2018 and full superintendent in June 2018.[1][2] Burke's previous career experience includes working as the district's deputy superintendent, a brigade staff officer in the United States Army, and the director of human resources of the Eureka Union School District.[3][4]
Past superintendents[edit]
- Jason Messer was the superintendent of the Manteca Unified School District from 2008 to 2018. Messer's previous career experience included working as a teacher, dean of students, and director of elementary instruction.[5]
School board elections[edit]
The Manteca Unified School District school board consists of seven members elected by district to four-year terms.[6]
| |
This officeholder information was last updated on June 9, 2021. Please contact us with any updates. | |
Election dates[edit]
Members of the Manteca Unified School District school board are elected to four-year terms. Three or four seats are up for election on a staggered basis every even-numbered year in November.
A general election was scheduled for November 3, 2020.
Public participation in board meetings[edit]
The Manteca Unified School District school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[7]
| “ |
Public Participation Members of the public are encouraged to attend Board meetings and to address the Board concerning any item on the agenda or within the Board's jurisdiction. So as not to inhibit public participation, persons attending Board meetings shall not be requested to sign in, complete a questionnaire, or otherwise provide their name or other information as a condition of attending the meeting. In order to conduct district business in an orderly and efficient manner, the Board requires that public presentations to the Board comply with the following procedures: 1. The Board shall give members of the public an opportunity to address the Board on any item of interest to the public that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, either before or during the Board's consideration of the item. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.3) 2. At a time so designated on the agenda at a regular meeting, members of the public may bring before the Board matters that are not listed on the agenda. The Board shall take no action or discussion on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except as authorized by law. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.2) 3. Without taking action, Board members or district staff members may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by the public about items not appearing on the agenda. Additionally, on their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the public, a Board or staff member may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his/her own activities. (Government Code 54954.2) Furthermore, the Board or a Board member may provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, ask staff to report back to the Board at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or take action directing staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (Government Code 54954.2) 4. The Board need not allow the public to speak on any item that has already been considered by a committee composed exclusively of Board members at a public meeting where the public had the opportunity to address the committee on that item. However, if the Board determines that the item has been substantially changed since the committee heard the item, the Board shall provide an opportunity for the public to speak. (Government Code 54954.3) 5. A person wishing to be heard by the Board shall first be recognized by the president and shall then proceed to comment as briefly as the subject permits. Individual speakers shall be allowed three (3) minutes to address the Board on each agenda item. Individual speakers shall be allowed five (5) minutes during public comment. The Board shall limit the total time for public input on each item to 20 minutes. With Board consent, the president may increase or decrease the time allowed for public presentation, depending on the topic and the number of persons wishing to be heard. The president may take a poll of speakers for or against a particular issue and may ask that additional persons speak only if they have something new to add. 6. The Board president may rule on the appropriateness of a topic. If the topic would be more suitably addressed at a later time, the president may indicate the time and place when it should be presented. The Board shall not prohibit public criticism of its policies, procedures, programs, services, acts, or omissions. (Government Code 54954.3) In addition, the Board may not prohibit public criticism of district employees. The Board president shall also encourage the complainant to file a complaint using the appropriate district complaint procedure. (cf. 1312.1 - Complaints Concerning District Employees) (cf. 9321 - Closed Session Purposes and Agendas) 7. The Board president shall not permit any disturbance or willful interruption of Board meetings. Persistent disruption by an individual or group shall be grounds for the president to terminate the privilege of addressing the Board. The Board may remove disruptive individuals and order the room cleared if necessary. In this case, members of the media not participating in the disturbance shall be allowed to remain, and individuals not participating in such disturbances may be allowed to remain at the discretion of the Board. When the room is ordered cleared due to a disturbance, further Board proceedings shall concern only matters appearing on the agenda. (Government Code 54957.9) When such disruptive conduct occurs, the Superintendent or designee shall contact local law enforcement.[8] |
” |
Budget[edit]
From 1993 to 2013, the Manteca Unified School District had an average of $152,799,190 in revenue and $153,541,619 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $38,249,095 in outstanding debt. The district retired $645,952 of its debt and issued $5,002,905 in new debt each year on average.[9]
Revenue[edit]
The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.
| Revenue by Source | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total | |||||||
| Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | ||||||
| Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $13,280,000 | 17.62% | $59,364,000 | 78.75% | $2,742,000 | 3.64% | $75,386,000 | ||||
| 1994 | $17,071,000 | 26.82% | $43,565,000 | 68.43% | $3,025,000 | 4.75% | $63,661,000 | ||||
| 1995 | $19,691,000 | 30.43% | $41,725,000 | 64.47% | $3,301,000 | 5.10% | $64,717,000 | ||||
| 1996 | $20,541,000 | 29.08% | $46,193,000 | 65.39% | $3,911,000 | 5.54% | $70,645,000 | ||||
| 1997 | $24,472,000 | 29.05% | $55,582,000 | 65.99% | $4,174,000 | 4.96% | $84,228,000 | ||||
| 1998 | $25,517,000 | 28.43% | $59,964,000 | 66.81% | $4,278,000 | 4.77% | $89,759,000 | ||||
| 1999 | $27,166,000 | 28.05% | $65,029,000 | 67.14% | $4,663,000 | 4.81% | $96,858,000 | ||||
| 2000 | $42,384,000 | 33.03% | $80,534,000 | 62.77% | $5,388,000 | 4.20% | $128,306,000 | ||||
| 2001 | $51,983,000 | 28.72% | $122,972,000 | 67.95% | $6,015,000 | 3.32% | $180,970,000 | ||||
| 2002 | $46,362,000 | 27.52% | $114,851,000 | 68.17% | $7,256,000 | 4.31% | $168,469,000 | ||||
| 2003 | $55,333,000 | 32.70% | $105,570,000 | 62.38% | $8,325,000 | 4.92% | $169,228,000 | ||||
| 2004 | $55,441,000 | 34.59% | $95,250,000 | 59.42% | $9,598,000 | 5.99% | $160,289,000 | ||||
| 2005 | $62,519,000 | 33.18% | $115,748,000 | 61.44% | $10,130,000 | 5.38% | $188,397,000 | ||||
| 2006 | $62,368,000 | 32.64% | $118,434,000 | 61.99% | $10,258,000 | 5.37% | $191,060,000 | ||||
| 2007 | $71,611,000 | 27.38% | $177,657,000 | 67.93% | $12,248,000 | 4.68% | $261,516,000 | ||||
| 2008 | $65,458,000 | 30.23% | $139,545,000 | 64.45% | $11,521,000 | 5.32% | $216,524,000 | ||||
| 2009 | $60,963,000 | 28.89% | $128,875,000 | 61.07% | $21,177,000 | 10.04% | $211,015,000 | ||||
| 2010 | $60,583,000 | 31.56% | $114,109,000 | 59.45% | $17,250,000 | 8.99% | $191,942,000 |
| 2011 | $58,180,000 | 29.02% | $122,105,000 | 60.91% | $20,178,000 | 10.07% | $200,463,000 |
| 2012 | $53,621,000 | 27.11% | $124,756,000 | 63.07% | $19,439,000 | 9.83% | $197,816,000 |
| 2013 | $57,644,000 | 29.18% | $122,382,000 | 61.95% | $17,508,000 | 8.86% | $197,534,000 |
| Avg. | $45,342,286 | 29.30% | $97,819,524 | 64.76% | $9,637,381 | 5.94% | $152,799,190 |
Expenditures[edit]
The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:
- Instruction: operation expenditures, state payments on behalf of the district for instruction and benefits, and retirement system transfers
- Support Services: support services, food services, and retirement system transfers for support service staff
- Capital Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
- Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on school system debt
- Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services
| Expenditures by Category | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget Total | |||||
| Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | ||
| Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $33,936,000 | 46.71% | $20,058,000 | 27.61% | $13,789,000 | 18.98% | $278,000 | 0.38% | $4,591,000 | 6.32% | $72,652,000 |
| 1994 | $35,497,000 | 51.44% | $20,373,000 | 29.52% | $10,246,000 | 14.85% | $378,000 | 0.55% | $2,511,000 | 3.64% | $69,005,000 |
| 1995 | $37,520,000 | 55.68% | $21,774,000 | 32.31% | $4,385,000 | 6.51% | $377,000 | 0.56% | $3,329,000 | 4.94% | $67,385,000 |
| 1996 | $39,001,000 | 57.06% | $21,677,000 | 31.72% | $4,234,000 | 6.19% | $246,000 | 0.36% | $3,190,000 | 4.67% | $68,348,000 |
| 1997 | $43,380,000 | 54.84% | $24,158,000 | 30.54% | $8,837,000 | 11.17% | $0 | 0.00% | $2,730,000 | 3.45% | $79,105,000 |
| 1998 | $47,629,000 | 53.46% | $27,959,000 | 31.38% | $10,529,000 | 11.82% | $6,000 | 0.01% | $2,977,000 | 3.34% | $89,100,000 |
| 1999 | $51,937,000 | 53.91% | $30,623,000 | 31.79% | $11,020,000 | 11.44% | $7,000 | 0.01% | $2,749,000 | 2.85% | $96,336,000 |
| 2000 | $66,111,000 | 53.19% | $34,263,000 | 27.57% | $21,622,000 | 17.40% | $15,000 | 0.01% | $2,278,000 | 1.83% | $124,289,000 |
| 2001 | $77,614,000 | 50.60% | $41,837,000 | 27.27% | $29,329,000 | 19.12% | $22,000 | 0.01% | $4,593,000 | 2.99% | $153,395,000 |
| 2002 | $82,788,000 | 54.71% | $47,270,000 | 31.24% | $18,073,000 | 11.94% | $945,000 | 0.62% | $2,247,000 | 1.48% | $151,323,000 |
| 2003 | $83,675,000 | 50.95% | $47,904,000 | 29.17% | $27,655,000 | 16.84% | $2,875,000 | 1.75% | $2,122,000 | 1.29% | $164,231,000 |
| 2004 | $86,327,000 | 45.78% | $49,228,000 | 26.10% | $48,467,000 | 25.70% | $2,167,000 | 1.15% | $2,392,000 | 1.27% | $188,581,000 |
| 2005 | $93,040,000 | 48.65% | $54,058,000 | 28.27% | $37,953,000 | 19.85% | $3,695,000 | 1.93% | $2,484,000 | 1.30% | $191,230,000 |
| 2006 | $101,088,000 | 46.51% | $61,190,000 | 28.16% | $47,584,000 | 21.89% | $5,203,000 | 2.39% | $2,264,000 | 1.04% | $217,329,000 |
| 2007 | $109,776,000 | 35.87% | $66,705,000 | 21.80% | $121,557,000 | 39.72% | $5,338,000 | 1.74% | $2,670,000 | 0.87% | $306,046,000 |
| 2008 | $116,189,000 | 48.42% | $74,434,000 | 31.02% | $41,052,000 | 17.11% | $5,425,000 | 2.26% | $2,846,000 | 1.19% | $239,946,000 |
| 2009 | $111,111,000 | 53.41% | $69,672,000 | 33.49% | $19,235,000 | 9.25% | $5,343,000 | 2.57% | $2,665,000 | 1.28% | $208,026,000 |
| 2010 | $102,138,000 | 56.74% | $59,408,000 | 33.00% | $10,110,000 | 5.62% | $6,111,000 | 3.39% | $2,239,000 | 1.24% | $180,006,000 |
| 2011 | $102,468,000 | 58.16% | $58,924,000 | 33.45% | $6,421,000 | 3.64% | $5,448,000 | 3.09% | $2,911,000 | 1.65% | $176,172,000 |
| 2012 | $104,218,000 | 57.96% | $61,341,000 | 34.11% | $6,138,000 | 3.41% | $4,862,000 | 2.70% | $3,251,000 | 1.81% | $179,810,000 |
| 2013 | $103,922,000 | 51.43% | $63,382,000 | 31.37% | $26,529,000 | 13.13% | $4,783,000 | 2.37% | $3,443,000 | 1.70% | $202,059,000 |
| Avg. | $77,588,810 | 51.69% | $45,535,143 | 30.04% | $24,988,810 | 14.55% | $2,548,762 | 1.33% | $2,880,095 | 2.39% | $153,541,619 |
Debt
The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.
| Debt | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Retired | Issued | Outstanding |
| Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1994 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1995 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1996 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1997 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1998 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1999 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 2000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 2001 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 2002 | $325,000 | $39,175,000 | $57,250,000 |
| 2003 | $325,000 | $0 | $56,925,000 |
| 2004 | $1,560,000 | $8,289,000 | $63,156,000 |
| 2005 | $235,000 | $0 | $53,106,000 |
| 2006 | $420,000 | $0 | $52,686,000 |
| 2007 | $1,525,000 | $25,597,000 | $76,758,000 |
| 2008 | $1,590,000 | $0 | $75,168,000 |
| 2009 | $1,865,000 | $0 | $73,303,000 |
| 2010 | $305,000 | $0 | $72,998,000 |
| 2011 | $1,806,000 | $0 | $71,192,000 |
| 2012 | $1,444,000 | $0 | $60,427,000 |
| 2013 | $2,165,000 | $32,000,000 | $90,262,000 |
| Avg. | $645,952 | $5,002,905 | $38,249,095 |
Teacher salaries[edit]
The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.
| Year | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|
| 2019[10] | $54,455 | $104,246 |
Academic performance[edit]
Proficiency assessments[edit]
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[11]
Mathematics[edit]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[12]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 29 | 42 | 18 | 23 | ≤10 | 38 | 38 |
| 2017-2018 | 28 | 41 | 17 | 23 | 20-29 | 40 | 36 |
| 2016-2017 | 25 | 39 | 16 | 19 | 11-19 | 32 | 31 |
| 2015-2016 | 25 | 39 | 14 | 20 | 11-19 | 29 | 30 |
| 2014-2015 | 24 | 38 | 15 | 20 | 15-19 | 28 | 30 |
| 2013-2014 | 56 | 65-69 | 35-39 | 51 | 40-59 | 40-59 | 63 |
| 2012-2013 | 50 | 64 | 36 | 44 | 45-49 | 50-54 | 57 |
| 2011-2012 | 50 | 63 | 34 | 45 | 50-54 | 45-49 | 56 |
| 2010-2011 | 49 | 63 | 36 | 44 | 50-54 | 55-59 | 55 |
Reading/language arts[edit]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[12]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 48 | 60 | 34 | 43 | 30-39 | 55 | 55 |
| 2017-2018 | 46 | 60 | 31 | 40 | 30-39 | 55 | 53 |
| 2016-2017 | 41 | 57 | 28 | 36 | 30-39 | 48 | 49 |
| 2015-2016 | 39 | 56 | 27 | 34 | 30-39 | 41 | 45 |
| 2014-2015 | 35 | 49 | 26 | 30 | 35-39 | 37 | 42 |
| 2013-2014 | 48 | 55-59 | 40-44 | 43 | 40-59 | 40-59 | 57 |
| 2012-2013 | 48 | 60 | 41 | 42 | 45-49 | 45-49 | 57 |
| 2011-2012 | 49 | 61 | 39 | 43 | 45-49 | 50-54 | 59 |
| 2010-2011 | 49 | 62 | 42 | 42 | 50-54 | 45-49 | 57 |
Graduation rates[edit]
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[12][13]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-2018 | 93 | 96 | 90-94 | 94 | ≥50 | ≥80 | 93 |
| 2016-2017 | 93 | ≥95 | 85-89 | 93 | ≥50 | ≥80 | 94 |
| 2015-2016 | 93 | ≥95 | 80-84 | 93 | ≥80 | ≥80 | 94 |
| 2014-2015 | 92 | ≥95 | 90-94 | 93 | ≥80 | ≥80 | 92 |
| 2013-2014 | 93 | ≥95 | 90-94 | 92 | ≥80 | ≥50 | 94 |
| 2012-2013 | 92 | ≥95 | 85-89 | 92 | ≥80 | 60-79 | 92 |
| 2011-2012 | 89 | 90-94 | 80-84 | 87 | ≥80 | ≥50 | 92 |
| 2010-2011 | 88 | 90-94 | 80-84 | 86 | ≥80 | ≥50 | 91 |
Student enrollment[edit]
| Year[14] | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 23,588 | -0.6 |
| 2017-2018 | 23,722 | 1.4 |
| 2016-2017 | 23,406 | 1.0 |
| 2015-2016 | 23,169 | 0.1 |
| 2014-2015 | 23,156 | 0.5 |
| 2013-2014 | 23,052 | -0.7 |
| 2012-2013 | 23,210 | -0.3 |
| 2011-2012 | 23,282 | -0.4 |
| 2010-2011 | 23,376 | 0.4 |
| 2009-2010 | 23,292 | 1.0 |
| 2008-2009 | 23,054 | -2.1 |
| 2007-2008 | 23,560 | -0.4 |
| 2006-2007 | 23,643 | -0.6 |
| 2005-2006 | 23,781 | 0.4 |
| 2004-2005 | 23,693 | 4.7 |
| 2003-2004 | 22,627 | 7.5 |
| 2002-2003 | 21,052 | -1.2 |
| 2001-2002 | 21,309 | 7.9 |
| 2000-2001 | 19,746 | 7.7 |
| 1999-2000 | 18,332 | 10.0 |
| 1998-1999 | 16,666 | 2.1 |
| 1997-1998 | 16,329 | 3.1 |
| 1996-1997 | 15,841 | 4.9 |
| 1995-1996 | 15,094 | 3.1 |
| 1994-1995 | 14,642 | 2.5 |
| 1993-1994 | 14,290 | 3.0 |
| 1992-1993 | 13,877 | 0.9 |
| 1991-1992 | 13,760 | 3.0 |
| 1990-1991 | 13,356 | 1.4 |
| 1989-1990 | 13,177 | 5.2 |
| 1988-1989 | 12,523 | 5.8 |
| 1987-1988 | 11,842 | 3.1 |
| 1986-1987 | 11,485 | - |
About the district[edit]
Manteca Unified School District is located in San Joaquin County, California. It is classified as a small suburban school district by the National Center for Education Statistics. The district served 23,588 students during the 2018-2019 school year and comprised 30 schools.[15]
During the 2018-2019 school year, 59.8% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 23.1% were English language learners, and 15.4% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP).[16]
| Racial Demographics, 2018-2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Race | Manteca Unified School District (%) | California K-12 students (%) |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 14.3 | 11.7 |
| Black | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| Hispanic | 56.3 | 54.6 |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Two or More Races | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| White | 18.4 | 22.9 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
Noteworthy events[edit]
2016: Failed recall attempt[edit]
Efforts to recall Alexander Bronson, Ashley Drain, and Sam Fant from their respective positions as representatives of Areas 6, 2, and 1 on the Manteca Unified School District Board of Trustees did not make it to the ballot. Both Bronson and Drain resigned before the efforts could move forward. The recall effort against Fant continued after their resignations, but recall supporters were unable to gather enough signatures to get it on the ballot.[17]
Bronson and Drain faced criminal election fraud charges over accusations that they lied about their addresses on election forms.[18] While Bronson resigned from the board on May 12, 2015, the accusations continued for Drain and Fant.[19] Both were named in the San Joaquin County Civil Grand Jury's report that outlined inappropriate behavior by board members. Fant and Drain were accused of using “perceived power to inappropriately achieve their ends.” On August 11, 2015, the board voted to accept the report.[20][21]
Drain resigned from her Area 2 position effective August 25, 2015. According to the district's administrative assistant Chelo de Leon, Drain gave no reason for her resignation.[22]
In September 2015, leaders of the recall effort said they would continue their push to recall Fant, but that effort ended when they did not turn in enough signatures by December 24, 2015.[17][23] In 2018, Drain was sentenced to 15 months of home detention for election fraud.[24]
Contact information[edit]
Manteca Unified School District
2271 W. Louise Ave.
Manteca, CA 95337
Phone: 209-825-3200
See also[edit]
| California | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
External links[edit]
- Search Google News for this topic
- Manteca Unified School District
- Manteca Educators' Association
- California Department of Education
- California School Boards Association
Footnotes[edit]
- ↑ Manteca Bulletin, "Burke picked as interim MUSD leader," May 31, 2018
- ↑ Recordnet.com, "Manteca Unified promotes interim chief to top job." June 13, 2018
- ↑ LinkedIn, "Clark Burke Ed.D.," accessed November 6, 2019
- ↑ Manteca Unified School District, "Superintendent / Dr. Clark Burke," accessed November 6, 2019
- ↑ Manteca Unified School District, "Superintendent," accessed December 3, 2014
- ↑ Manteca Unified School District, "Board and Superintendent," accessed June 25, 2016
- ↑ Manteca Unified School District, "Board Bylaws: Meeting Conduct," accessed June 9, 2021
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, "Public School System Finances: Historical Data," accessed December 1, 2015
- ↑ Manteca Unified School District, "Certificated Salary Schedule - 2019," accessed June 9, 2021
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 To protect student privacy, percentages were reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (5) or fewer students were included in a data set, the data was replaced by "PS."
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Year 2017-18 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "ElSi tableGenerator," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Search for Public School Districts," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Recordnet.com, "Recall effort against Fant fails," January 22, 2016
- ↑ ABC 10, "Manteca school board members charged with election fraud," April 25, 2015
- ↑ ABC 10, "Manteca school trustee resigns, another facing recall," May 13, 2015
- ↑ Recordnet.com, "Fear and loathing in Manteca Unified," June 3, 2015
- ↑ Manteca Bulletin, "Manteca board accepts scathing Grand Jury report," August 12, 2015
- ↑ Recordnet.com, "Trustee Drain resigns," August 25, 2015
- ↑ Manteca Bulletin, "Recall effort against Fant will continue," September 15, 2015
- ↑ Manteca Bulletin, "Drain gets 15 months home detention for election fraud," September 5, 2018
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
EncycloReader
is supported by the 
KSF