National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | |
Basic facts | |
Location: | Washington, D.C. |
Type: | 501(c)(6) |
Top official: | Barry Pollack, President |
Year founded: | 1958 |
Website: | Official website |
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is a 501(c)(6) membership organization that aims to influence criminal justice policies and practice. According to SCOTUSblog, the group is a left-leaning organization; their focus on "defendants’ constitutional right to counsel" has allied them with traditionally right-leaning groups like the Cato Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, according to Reuters.[1][2]
According to its website, the NACDL has the following mission statement:[3]
“ | Ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime...
Foster the integrity, independence and expertise of the criminal defense profession... Promote the proper and fair administration of criminal justice.[4] |
” |
The NACDL was founded in 1958 as a professional bar association. According to the group's website they have "9,200 direct members in 28 countries - and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys -- include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, active U.S. military defense counsel, law professors and judges." The group's national headquarters are in Washington, D.C.[5]
The main work of the NACDL is to defend the constitutional rights of those accused of crimes. The group's primary objective is "preserving fairness within America's criminal justice system."[5] The group aims to ensure fairness for those who have been accused of crimes by advocating for reforms to forensic science in the courtroom, stronger protections for attorney-client privilege, guarantees of defendants' right to a fair trial, and providing counsel for those who cannot afford it.
In the area of forensics, the NACDL has called for a greater emphasis on science in the evidence collection and analysis processes. Barry Pollack, the group's president, told The Wall Street Journal in 2016 that forensic evidence in the courtroom "cries out for further independent analysis." He further suggested that "the jury should never hear from an expert who doesn’t have real science behind him."[6]
According to Reuters, one of the association's primary objectives is to provide legal counsel to those who are unable to afford quality representation. In 2014, Reuters reported, "Providing good lawyers for defendants who can’t afford counsel is a core mission for NACDL." The article went on to call the organization "a group dedicated to defending the downtrodden."[2]
The NACDL, through its Amicus curiae committee, files amicus curiae briefs in courts throughout the country. This committee aims "to provide amicus assistance on the federal and state level in those cases that present issues of importance to criminal defendants, criminal defense lawyers, and/or the criminal justice system as a whole, and to do so in a manner that is consistent with NACDL policy and complements NACDL’s public policy advocacy initiatives."[7]
In two separate reviews of amicus activity, SCOTUSblog found that the NACDL had filed the second-most amicus briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court. The first review was of briefs filed between May 2004 and August 2007; the second reviewed briefs from May 2009 to August 2012.[1][8]
The following are the U.S. Supreme Court cases for which the NACDL has filed amicus briefs from 2004 to 2016, according to the NACDL's website.
Amicus briefs filed by the NADCL in the U.S. Supreme Court, 2004-2016 | ||
---|---|---|
2004[9] | ||
| ||
2005[10] | ||
| ||
2006[11] | ||
| ||
2007[12] | ||
| ||
2008[13] | ||
| ||
2009[14] | ||
| ||
2010[15] | ||
| ||
2011[16] | ||
| ||
2012[17] | ||
| ||
2013[18] | ||
| ||
2014[19] | ||
| ||
2015[20] | ||
| ||
2016[21] | ||
|
Barry Pollack is the president of the NACDL, and Rick Jones is the president-elect.[22]
According to the NACDL's website, the following individuals were members of the board of directors as of September 2016:[23]
The following is a breakdown of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers's revenues and expenses as submitted to the IRS for the 2011 to 2013 fiscal years:
Annual revenue and expenses for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 2011–2013 | ||
Tax Year | Total Revenue | Total Expenses |
2013[24] | $6,842,002 | $6,231,557 |
2012[25] | $5,963,751 | $5,803,416 |
2011[26] | $5,219,063 | $5,867,099 |
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
|