By Geoff Pallay and Leslie Graves
There were 6,127 state legislative seats, in 46 states, up for election on November 2, 2010. We took a look at each of the 46 states to see how many state legislative incumbents chose to run for re-election in 2010.
Our main findings:
Comparing states:
The score that states received based on their ratio of open seats was one of 3 factors used in evaluating which states had the highest, and which had the lowest, overall competitiveness in the 2010 state legislative elections.
The state that was least competitive as defined by the percentage of its seats where the incumbent did not run for re-election in 2010 is defined as #46, while the state that was most competitive as defined by the percentage of its seats where the incumbent did not run for re-election is defined as #1; that is, 1 = "most competitive", 46 = "least competitive".
Open state legislative seats, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Senate | House | Total | Open seats rank | Overall competitiveness rank | |||||||||||||||||||
At stake | Open | % | At stake | Open | % | At stake | Open | % | ||||||||||||||||
Nationwide | 1,169 | 274 | 23.4% | 4,958 | 869 | 17.5% | 6,127 | 1,143 | 18.7% | |||||||||||||||
Alabama | 35 | 8 | 22.9% | 105 | 11 | 10.5% | 140 | 19 | 13.6% | 22 | 30 | |||||||||||||
Alaska | 10 | 1 | 10.0% | 40 | 4 | 10.0% | 50 | 5 | 10.0% | 33 | 36 | |||||||||||||
Arizona | 30 | 15 | 50.0% | 60 | 24 | 40.0% | 90 | 39 | 43.3% | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||
Arkansas | 17 | 13 | 76.5% | 100 | 40 | 40.0% | 117 | 53 | 45.3% | 3 | 32 | |||||||||||||
California | 20 | 10 | 50.0% | 80 | 28 | 35.0% | 100 | 38 | 38.0% | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||
Colorado | 19 | 6 | 31.6% | 65 | 14 | 21.5% | 84 | 20 | 23.8% | 12 | 16 | |||||||||||||
Connecticut | 36 | 4 | 11.1% | 151 | 15 | 9.9% | 187 | 19 | 10.2% | 32 | 26 | |||||||||||||
Delaware | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 41 | 4 | 9.8% | 52 | 4 | 7.7% | 43 | 28 | |||||||||||||
Florida | 23 | 12 | 52.2% | 120 | 34 | 28.3% | 143 | 46 | 32.2% | 9 | 21 | |||||||||||||
Georgia | 56 | 11 | 19.6% | 180 | 27 | 15.0% | 236 | 38 | 16.1% | 20 | 44 | |||||||||||||
Hawaii | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 51 | 5 | 9.8% | 66 | 8 | 12.1% | 26 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Idaho | 35 | 1 | 2.9% | 70 | 8 | 11.4% | 105 | 9 | 8.6% | 39 | 29 | |||||||||||||
Illinois | 21 | 1 | 4.8% | 118 | 11 | 9.3% | 139 | 12 | 8.6% | 39 | 33 | |||||||||||||
Indiana | 25 | 3 | 12.0% | 100 | 9 | 9.0% | 125 | 12 | 9.6% | 36 | 23 | |||||||||||||
Iowa | 25 | 3 | 12.0% | 100 | 14 | 14.0% | 125 | 17 | 13.6% | 22 | 27 | |||||||||||||
Kansas | No elections | 125 | 10 | 8.0% | 125 | 10 | 8.0% | 42 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Kentucky | 19 | 2 | 10.5% | 100 | 5 | 5.0% | 119 | 7 | 5.9% | 44 | 35 | |||||||||||||
Maine | 35 | 9 | 25.7% | 151 | 34 | 22.5% | 186 | 43 | 23.1% | 13 | 11 | |||||||||||||
Maryland | 47 | 3 | 6.4% | 141 | 23 | 16.3% | 188 | 26 | 13.8% | 21 | 5 | |||||||||||||
Massachusetts | 40 | 8 | 20.0% | 160 | 26 | 16.3% | 200 | 34 | 17.0% | 18 | 41 | |||||||||||||
Michigan | 38 | 29 | 76.3% | 110 | 51 | 46.4% | 148 | 80 | 54.1% | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Minnesota | 67 | 9 | 13.4% | 134 | 15 | 11.2% | 201 | 24 | 11.9% | 28 | 12 | |||||||||||||
Missouri | 17 | 10 | 58.8% | 163 | 65 | 39.9% | 180 | 75 | 41.7% | 5 | 14 | |||||||||||||
Montana | 26 | 17 | 65.4% | 100 | 34 | 34.0% | 126 | 51 | 40.5% | 6 | 8 | |||||||||||||
Nebraska | 24 | 3 | 12.5% | N/A[1] | 24 | 3 | 12.5% | 25 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Nevada | 11 | 8 | 72.7% | 42 | 19 | 45.2% | 53 | 27 | 50.9% | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||
New Hampshire | 24 | 5 | 20.8% | 400 | 97 | 24.3% | 424 | 102 | 24.1% | 11 | 4 | |||||||||||||
New Mexico | No elections | 70 | 3 | 4.3% | 70 | 3 | 4.3% | 46 | 43 | |||||||||||||||
New York | 62 | 6 | 9.7% | 150 | 19 | 12.7% | 212 | 25 | 11.8% | 29 | 17 | |||||||||||||
North Carolina | 50 | 8 | 16.0% | 120 | 10 | 8.3% | 170 | 18 | 10.6% | 31 | 20 | |||||||||||||
North Dakota | 24 | 4 | 16.7% | 48 | 11 | 22.9% | 72 | 15 | 20.8% | 14 | 25 | |||||||||||||
Ohio | 17 | 8 | 47.1% | 99 | 21 | 21.2% | 116 | 29 | 25.0% | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Oklahoma | 24 | 8 | 33.3% | 101 | 14 | 13.9% | 125 | 22 | 17.6% | 17 | 42 | |||||||||||||
Oregon | 16 | 2 | 12.5% | 60 | 5 | 8.3% | 76 | 7 | 9.2% | 37 | 13 | |||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 25 | 3 | 12.0% | 203 | 18 | 8.9% | 228 | 21 | 9.2% | 37 | 34 | |||||||||||||
Rhode Island | 38 | 5 | 13.2% | 75 | 10 | 13.3% | 113 | 15 | 13.3% | 24 | 15 | |||||||||||||
South Carolina | No elections | 124 | 12 | 9.7% | 124 | 12 | 9.7% | 35 | 45 | |||||||||||||||
South Dakota | 35 | 13 | 37.1% | 70 | 21 | 30.0% | 105 | 34 | 32.4% | 8 | 21 | |||||||||||||
Tennessee | 17 | 2 | 11.8% | 99 | 8 | 8.1% | 116 | 10 | 8.6% | 39 | 39 | |||||||||||||
Texas | 16 | 1 | 6.3% | 150 | 8 | 5.3% | 166 | 9 | 5.4% | 45 | 46 | |||||||||||||
Utah | 15 | 1 | 6.7% | 75 | 8 | 10.7% | 90 | 9 | 10.0% | 33 | 24 | |||||||||||||
Vermont | 30 | 5 | 16.7% | 150 | 16 | 10.7% | 180 | 21 | 11.7% | 30 | 40 | |||||||||||||
Washington | 25 | 4 | 16.0% | 98 | 16 | 16.3% | 123 | 20 | 16.3% | 19 | 19 | |||||||||||||
West Virginia | 17 | 3 | 17.6% | 100 | 11 | 11.0% | 117 | 14 | 12.0% | 27 | 8 | |||||||||||||
Wisconsin | 17 | 3 | 17.6% | 99 | 20 | 20.2% | 116 | 23 | 19.8% | 16 | 18 | |||||||||||||
Wyoming | 15 | 4 | 26.7% | 60 | 11 | 18.3% | 75 | 15 | 20.0% | 15 | 38 |
There are 15 term-limited states. Of those, only Louisiana did not hold elections in 2010. Of the 14 term-limited states that held elections, 35.13% of all seats were open. In non-term-limited states, that number fell to 12.90%.
The discrepancy was largest in the Senate. In term limited states, 48.81% of seats were open. However, that number fell to only 13.24% for states without term limits. That means 721 of the 831 Senators ran for re-election in states without term limits.
|
|