|
Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its election administration. |
Primary elections allow voters to determine which candidates compete in the general election and can be nonpartisan or partisan. In partisan primaries, voters choose the candidates they prefer for a political party to nominate in the general election.
The laws governing primary elections vary from state to state and can even vary within states by locality and political party. For example, only registered party members are allowed to vote in closed primaries, while registered party members and unaffiliated voters are allowed to vote in semi-closed primaries, and all voters are allowed to vote in open primaries.
Primary elections also vary by the way their outcomes are determined. Majority systems require the winning candidate to receive at least fifty percent of the votes cast, while plurality systems do not. In top-two primaries, top-four primaries, and blanket primaries, all candidates are listed on the same ballot, regardless of partisan affiliation.
See the sections below for general information on the use of primary elections in the United States and specific information on the types of primaries held in New Jersey:
In general, there are two broad criteria by which primary elections can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction:
For more complete information on these criteria, click "[Show more]" below.
The rules of participation in primary elections vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction (in some cases, different political parties may enforce different participation criteria within a single jurisdiction). In general, there are three basic primary election participation models used in the United States:
Methods for tallying votes to determine a primary election's outcome include the following:
In 20 states, at least one political party utilizes open primaries to nominate partisan candidates for congressional and state-level (e.g. state legislators, governors, etc.) offices. In 14 states, at least one party utilizes closed primaries to nominate partisan candidates for these offices. In 15 states, at least one party utilizes semi-closed primaries. In 5 states, top-two primaries or a variation are used.[6] These state primaries are a separate entity and are not included in the totals for open, closed, or semi-closed primaries.
New Jersey state law provides for semi-closed primaries, meaning that a voter generally must be registered as a party member in order to participate in that party's primary. A previously unaffiliated voter can participate in the primary of his or her choice by affiliating with that party at the polls on the day of the election. Otherwise, a voter must indicate his or her party preference (e.g., via an updated voter registration) no later than the 55th day preceding the primary in order to vote in that party's primary. Winners in primary elections are determined via plurality vote.[7][1][8][9]
The table below lists New Jersey offices for which parties must conduct primary elections to nominate their candidates.
Elective offices for which parties must conduct primaries to nominate general election candidates | |
---|---|
Office | Number of seats |
Governor of New Jersey | 1 |
United States Senators | 2 |
State legislators | 80 |
Local officials | Varies by municipality |
In New Jersey, county parties have the ability to select the placement of a candidate's name on the ballot in their respective counties. The selection of the candidate can be determined by a full vote of the county party committee or at the discretion of the county party chairperson. In counties that use the process, positions up for election are listed in rows with the candidates running for those positions listed in columns. Oftentimes, the candidate endorsed by the county party will appear in the leftmost column, known as the county line, with remaining candidates appearing in columns to the right.[10]
On February 26, 2024, three Democratic candidates for U.S. Congress sued in federal court to eliminate New Jersey's county line primary ballot design.[11] According to Politico: "The county line is New Jersey’s unique primary ballot design where party-backed candidates are placed in a single column or row from the highest office to the lowest. Candidates not endorsed by county parties are often placed less prominently on primary ballots. Candidates who are on the county line have been shown to have a significant electoral advantage."[12] Nineteen of New Jersey's 21 counties used the county line design at the time of the lawsuit.[12] Most jurisdictions in the United States use a ballot design that groups all candidates running for the same office in the same part of the ballot.
Among the plaintiffs in the challenge was Rep. Andy Kim (D) of New Jersey's 3rd Congressional District. At the time of the lawsuit, Kim was a candidate for the U.S. Senate seat held by Bob Menendez (D). Sarah Schoengood (D) and Carolyn Rush (D), each a candidate for a U.S. House seat in New Jersey, joined Kim in the challenge. The filing named the election clerk in all 19 counties that used the county line system as defendants.[13]
The suit alleged that the county line ballot design violated the First and 14th amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and said: "The system provides preferential ballot position for such candidates and displays them in a manner that nudges voters to select them, even when they otherwise might not."[13] A campaign spokesperson for Tammy Murphy (D), who was a candidate for U.S. Senate but later dropped out of the race, criticized the lawsuit, saying "Andy Kim doesn't have a problem with the county line system, he has a problem with the idea of losing county lines — as he is perfectly happy to participate in the process when he wins, and he has benefited from the lines in every other election he's run."[11] Defendants in the case argued that there was not time to modify and print ballots before the April 20 deadline to send mail ballots for the upcoming primary, and that the system helped voters identify party supported candidates.[14]
On March 29, U.S. District Judge Zahid Quraishi issued a preliminary injunction blocking the use of the county line in the June 4th Democratic Primary.[15] In the opinion, Quraishi wrote, "Mandatory injunctive relief is reserved only for the most unusual cases. Plaintiffs’ burden on this Motion is therefore particularly heavy. Nevertheless, the Court finds, based on this record, that Plaintiffs have met their burden and that this is the rare instance when mandatory relief is warranted.”[16] In a statement released on his campaign website, Kim said of the ruling that "(t)oday's decision is a victory for a fairer, more democratic politics in New Jersey. It's a victory built from the incredible grassroots work of activists across our state who saw an undemocratic system marginalizing the voices of voters, and worked tirelessly to fix it."[17] After the decision, clerks from three counties said they would not appeal the decision.[12]
Although the ruling did not apply to the Republican primary, the New Jersey County Republican Chairs Association submitted a brief defending the constitutionality of the county line ballot design.[12]
On April 3, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied the remaining defendants' request to block the lower court's decision.[12] By the next day, clerks in all but two counties included in the lawsuit said they would not appeal the ruling, however the Camden County Democratic Committee (CCDC) and several other party committees continued their appeal.[14][18]
On April 15, New Jersey Vicinage 3 Superior Court Judge John E. Harrington denied a request for an injunction to block the use of county line ballots in the state's June 2024 Republican primaries. Four Republican congressional candidates brought the challenge after the March 29 ruling by Judge Quraishi that barred the use of the ballot design for state's June Democratic primaries. Judge Harrington reasoned that there was not enough time between the challenge and the scheduled primaries to grant the injunction, saying "It’s too comprehensive a change for this court do this now."[19][20]
On April 17, the Third Circuit issued a unanimous ruling upholding the lower court's decision to bar the use of the county line ballot design in the June Democratic primaries. According to reporting from the New Jersey Globe, in oral arguments "CCDC lawyer Bill Tambussi contended that the county line allows parties to exercise their constitutionally protected rights to associate with their preferred candidates and assist voters in finding those candidates."[18] In the ruling, judge Kent Jordan wrote "Nothing in the preliminary injunction prohibits the CCDC from including county parties’ slogans on the ballot, endorsing candidates, communicating those endorsements, or associating by any other constitutional means. The injunction simply means that the CCDC does not get to bracket its preferred candidates together on the ballot... Any harm to the state’s or the CCDC’s interests is outweighed by the burdens on the Plaintiffs’ associational rights.”[21]
The table below lists bills related to primary elections that have been introduced during (or carried over to) the current legislative session in New Jersey. The following information is included for each bill:
Bills are organized alphabetically, first by state and then by bill number. The table displays up to 100 results by default. To view additional results, use the arrows in the upper-right corner of the table. For more information about a particular bill, click the bill number. This will open a separate page with additional information.
Since 2017, Ballotpedia has tracked no ballot measures relating to primary elections in New Jersey.
State election laws are changing. Keeping track of the latest developments in all 50 states can seem like an impossible job.
Here's the solution: Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker.
Ballotpedia's Election Administration Tracker sets the industry standard for ease of use, flexibility, and raw power. But that's just the beginning of what it can do:
The Ballot Bulletin is a weekly email that delivers the latest updates on election policy. The Ballot Bulletin tracks developments in election policy around the country, including legislative activity, big-picture trends, and recent news. Each email contains in-depth data from our Election Administration Legislation Tracker. You'll also be able to track relevant legislation, with links to and summaries of the bills themselves.
Click below to view recent issues of The Ballot Bulletin.
Enter your email address below to subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin.
<ref>
tag; name "ncslprimaries" defined multiple times with different content
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs named regis
|