Public-sector union policy in New Hampshire

This page is outside of Ballotpedia's current coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia.

On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (Janus v. AFSCME), a case concerning the constitutionality of public-sector labor union agency fees. In its 5-4 decision, the court ruled that being required to give any financial support to a union violates employees' rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. With Janus, the high court overturned the precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education that had permitted public-sector unions to collect agency fees to support non-political activities such as collective bargaining efforts and administrative work.^[1][2]

In anticipation of and in response to this ruling, bills relating to public-sector employee unions were introduced in state legislatures across the United States. This article provides general information on public-sector unions and relevant legislation in New Hampshire.

Background[edit]

Generally, members of an employee union pay fees to that union. These fees support the union's activities, which can include collective bargaining and contract administration, as well as political activities, such as lobbying. Some public-sector employees do not wish to join a union, and some are opposed to unions' political activities. In 1977, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled, in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, that employees cannot be required to give financial support to a union's political activities. However, the court found that it was not a violation of employees' rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to require them to pay fees to support union activities from which they benefit, such as collective bargaining. This ruling was overturned by Janus, which held that such fees are not constitutional.^[3]

Relevant legislation in New Hampshire[edit]

See also: Public-sector union policy in the United States, 2018-2023

This legislation tracking project has been archived. Click here to view public-sector union legislation introduced from 2018 to 2023.

See also[edit]

Select a state on the map below to read more about public-sector employee union legislation in that state.

• New Hampshire State Legislature
• Janus v. AFSCME
• Supreme Court of the United States

Footnotes[edit]

v • e Public-sector union policy in the United States Public-sector union policy in the United States Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming