Note: Redistricting takes place every 10 years after completion of the United States Census. The information here pertains to the 2010 redistricting process. For information on more recent redistricting developments, see this article. |
Redistricting in Maine | |
General information | |
Partisan control: Republican | |
Process: Legislative with Advisory Committee | |
Deadline: September 30, 2011 (Congressional) | |
Total seats | |
Congress: 2 | |
State Senate: 35 | |
State House: 153 |
This article details the timeline of redistricting events in Maine following the 2010 census. It also provides contextual information about the redistricting process and census information.
The Maine Legislature was responsible for redistricting. The commission on redistricting officially only acted in an advisory role.
The Maine Constitution provided authority for the Legislature to establish an Apportionment Commission to develop a plan for redistricting the House, Senate, or both in Section 1A, Part Third of Article IV. The Legislature, as stated in Section 3, Part First of Article IV, could enact the Commission's plan or a plan of its own.
There was a 15 member Advisory Apportionment Commission in Maine. Members were selected as follows:[1]
With a court-order to complete redistricting before September 30, 2011, the commission was named in early July 2011. The following people served on the commission.[2]
|
|
On March 23, 2011, the Census Bureau shipped Maine's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders. This data guided redistricting for state and local offices. The data is publicly available for download.[3]
These tables show the change in population in the five largest cities and counties in Maine from 2000 to 2010.[4]
|
|
Criticism of prisoner populations and redistricting increased following the January 8, 2011 decision by Maine's Regional School Unit 13 to close a local school and move 8th graders to a regional school. Critics said supporters of closing the school only succeeded because of extra votes they should not have.
Each town received a weighed number of votes based on population. The population of the town of Thomaston was based on 2006 Census Bureau estimates, which included the non-resident population of a state prison which closed years before.[5]
There had been a movement in some states to change how prison populations were counted. In 2011, Delaware, Maryland, and New York altered how they counted their prison populations for redistricting purposes. For the first time, prisoners would be counted according to their last known addresses, rather than their prison address, which inflated the power of prison districts.[6]
In late January 2011, a member of the state's House of Representatives, Portland Democrat John Hinck, proposed LD 153, alternately HP 136, which would shrink both the House and the Maine State Senate. The two chambers, seating 151 and 35 members at the time, respectively, would be trimmed to 101 and 23, respectively.[7]
Before it could become law, LD 153 needed to receive a super majority in both chambers, at which point it would become a proposed Constitutional Amendment for voters to consider in November 2012. Upon its introduction, the bill was referred to the Committee for State and Local Government of both the Senate and the House. The Committee rejected this proposal and several other similar proposals that would have reduced the size of the State House and State Senate.[8]
Maine's law required that the state wait until 2013 to redraw Congressional maps. Two citizens filed suit, arguing against the law since the data were already available. A lawsuit filed for them in federal court, Desena v. State of Maine, sought to have the timetable pushed forward.[9][10]
Although the state's Constitution required that maps for the state's House and Senate be drawn in 2013, the law mandating that Congressional maps be done at the same time was only in statute.
Central to the complaint was information in the Census indicating Maine's two Congressional districts, which remained as they were for the 2012 election as things stood, were out of balance and could have led to vote dilation for southern Mainers. 2010 population counts showed the 1st District having 668,515 residents and the 2nd 659,846, a difference of 8,669.[11]
A panel of three federal judges said on April 27, 2011 that the lawsuit was on a fast track. Parties were given three weeks to submit written briefs, with oral arguments occurring in the second week in June. The Democratic Party, which opposed the suit, was granted intervenor status. They argued that the suit was an attempt by Republicans to gerrymander the two districts in order to put Reps. Chellie Pingree and Mike Michaud in the same district, forcing them to be in opposition to one another.[12]
The three-judge panel consisted of U.S. District Court Judges for Maine D. Brock Hornby and George Singal, with First Circuit Judge Bruce Selya acting as chairman. If the panel's ruling was appealed, it would have gone directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.[13]
State senator Debra Plowman (R) and State rep Kenneth Fredette (R) discuss the two proposed redistricting plans in August 2011. |
The first hearing was Thursday, June 9, 2011 in Portland. Although the plaintiffs contended that the delay was unconstitutional, the Maine Democratic Party joined the other side, describing the arrangement as one working too well to justify significant change.[14] The three judges handed down a swift decision, finding Maine's two seats disproportionate and ruling the redistricting had to occur before the 2012 elections.[15] Under the ruling, Maine had until the first day of 2012 to redistrict the state.
Parties were given until June 20, 2011 to suggest action going forward, and were warned the panel would take actual redistricting upon itself if no satisfactory plan were put forward.
After the judicial panel made its holding, the three parties involved in the case submitted proposals for how to complete redistricting in the allotted time.[16]
On June 22, 2011, Judge George Singal ordered the Maine State Legislature to finish redistricting by September 30, 2011. If it did not complete that task, then the Maine Supreme Court would have until November 15 to finish redrawing the two districts.[18]
Part 1 of the Maine Reapportionment commission meeting on August 15, 2011. |
Part 2 of the Maine Reapportionment commission meeting on August 15, 2011 |
On August 4, 2011, Governor Paul LePage (R) called a special session for legislators to deal with redistricting, starting on September 27. A bipartisan commission created a map and submitted it to legislators for a vote during the session.[21][22]
In August 2011, Democrats and Republicans each released a draft plan to redraw the two Congressional districts. The Democratic plan had very small differences from the then-current map. However, the Republican proposal moved several counties around and notably, would have moved Congresswoman Chellie Pingree out of the 1st Congressional district.[23] The following counties would be moved:
Both plans accomplished the task of making the districts' populations essentially the same.[24]
During the week of August 22, 2011, Democratic and Republican officials worked on a compromise plan. On August 24, the GOP withdrew an alternative map that was meant to address Democratic concerns. [25] On August 25, partisan leaders -- Democratic Senators Seth Goodall (D) and Debra Plowman (R) -- vowed to continue working together toward a map the legislature could support.[26]
The commission approved a map on August 30, 2011. The map is non-binding to the legislature. |
On August 30, 2011, the commission voted along party lines 8-7 to send the Democratic-proposed map to the legislature. The deciding vote was cast by independent Michael Friedman, who also served as commission chair. Cumberland, Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc, York, and part of Kennebec counties will be in the new 1st District.[27]
The approved map -- called Vassalboro-Gardiner -- shifted Gardiner, Vassalboro, Vienna, Rome, Oakland Wayne, and Unity townships in order to make the districts constitutional. About 20,000 voters were affected. The Republicans map was also sent along in the form of a minority report, according to State senator Debra Plowman (R).
Republicans had presented a last-minute compromise attempt before the August 30, 2011 meeting, but the commission opted for the Democratic map. [28]
In a special session on September 27, 2011, Maine state legislators approved a new Congressional map with nearly unanimous approval. The votes were 140-3 in the Maine House of Representatives and 35-0 in the Maine State Senate.[29]
The final plan made little structural changes to the map. The two districts were largely the same, except they had almost the same population. Only Kennebec County was affected by the new map, with Waterville and Winslow shifting from the 2nd to the 1st District. Also, 11 towns moved from the 1st to the 2nd District.[29]
On September 28, 2011, Governor Paul LePage (R) signed the bill into law.[30]
The Maine Supreme Court set a deadline of October 12 for any lawsuit regarding the passed Congressional map.[31]
The 15-member redistricting commission began the process of redrawing state House and Senate maps on February 1, 2013. The commission was led by Chairman Michael Friedman, an attorney who also led the congressional redistricting committee.
A redistricting plan was passed unanimously by the Maine Redistricting Commission on May 31, 2013.[32] The Senate unanimously approved the redistricting plan and the House followed by voting 133-11 to pass the plan. On June 14, 2013, Governor Paul LePage signed the redistricting plan, putting the plan in effect for candidates and voters participating in the June 10, 2014, primary election and November 4, 2014, general election..[33]
Maine's law required the state to wait until 2013 to redraw Congressional maps. Two citizens argued against this law since the data was already available. A lawsuit filed for them in federal court, Desena v. State of Maine, sought to have the timetable pushed forward.[34][35]
While the state's Constitution required that maps for the state's House and Senate be drawn in 2013, the law mandating that Congressional maps be done at the same time was only a statute.
Central to the complaint was information in the Census indicating Maine's two Congressional districts, based on the lines used in the 2010 elections that would have remained as they were for the 2012 election if the law stood, were out of balance and could under-represent southern Mainers.
On August 22, 2011, independent voter Mike Turcotte filed a lawsuit that alleged the political parties had too much control over the map-drawing process. The suit said the ratio of unenrolled voters to political parties on the redistricting commission was unequal to that of the voter registration in Maine, thereby violating equal representation. The commission was made up of 15 members -- 14 of which were registered Democratic or Republican.
Partisan registration and representation by congressional district, 2010 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Congressional district[36] | Republicans | Democrats | Other | District total | Party advantage* | 111th Congress | 112th Congress | ||
1 (Southwest Shore) | |||||||||
2 (remainder of the state) | |||||||||
State Totals | 272,871 | 322,848 | 378,136 | 973,855 | 18.32% Democratic | 2 D, 0 R | 2 D, 0 R | ||
*The partisan registration advantage was computed as the gap between the two major parties in registered voters. |
Prior to 1964, the Maine House of Representatives was apportioned by a complex process whereby each county was allotted the same proportion of the total 151 representatives as the county's population in relation to the state's total population. The House was responsible for redistricting itself, but this often led to inaction due to conflicts between rural and urban areas. This was partly reinforced by the state Constitution, which included provisions that benefited rural voters and the Republican Party.
Prior to 1966, the Maine State Senate was redistricted by counties, with each county considered a district. Seats were divided among the districts by population, with no district allotted more than five. The Senate had no constitutional requirement to reapportion and only did so when population growth led a county to earn a new seat. To that end, there were no changes in Senate districts from 1931-61.
In 1961, the legislature formed a constitutional commission in order to create a redistricting plan for both chambers. The commission made a series of recommendations, only to have them rejected by the legislature. However, a modified version of the plan for the House was approved by voters as a constitutional amendment in 1963. Among other things, the amendment brought districts closer in population and also stated that if the legislature failed to redistrict, the Supreme Judicial Court took over the task. The House used these rules to redistrict in 1964, leading to an increase in the competitiveness of elections and in the number of Democrats in office.
Similarly, voters in 1966 approved a constitutional referendum dealing with Senate redistricting. During that same year, a special commission on Senate reapportionment was created. However, due to conflicts with the legislature, they failed to approve a plan, and the job was taken up by the Supreme Judicial Court. Like the 1964 House plan, the 1967 Senate plan took undue advantage from rural sectors, effectively increasing the number of Democrats elected.
In 1969, voters approved another amendment that refined the Senate redistricting process. The Senate was scheduled to reapportion during the 1971 session, but the legislature was unable to agree on a plan, leaving it up to the Supreme Judicial Court. When it came time for the House in 1974, the legislature once again failed to pass a plan, and the Court had to step in.[37]
2000 population deviation[38] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Office | Percentage | ||||||
Congressional districts | 0.00% | ||||||
State House districts | 9.33% | ||||||
State Senate districts | 3.57% | ||||||
Under federal law, districts could vary from an Ideal District by up to 10%, though the lowest number achievable was preferred. Ideal Districts were computed through simple division of the number of seats for any office into the population at the time of the Census. |
The 2003 Apportionment Commission's plans for Congress, Senate, and House all ended up in the courts. The Commission's plan for congressional districts was not approved by the legislature, leaving the Supreme Judicial Court to draw the boundaries. The Court also drew the Senate districts, as the Commission failed to pass such a plan. The Commission's plan for the House was passed and signed by the governor, but challenged by various parties for compactness and contiguity issues. All challenges were rejected by the court.[39]
The following measures have appeared on the Maine ballot pertaining to redistricting.
|